Cascade Biocatalysis Designed for the Allylic Oxidation of α-Pinene

A biocatalytic cascade system using a cocktail of oxidoreductase enzymes (2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase) was designed for the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene into value-added products (e.g., verbenol and verbenone). The oxidative transformation involved a two-step process as follows: (+)-α-pinene was (i) oxidized on the allylic position with H2O2 mainly assisted by 2-1B peroxidase leading to verbenol as the principal reaction product, and (ii) directed to verbenone in the presence of M120 laccase responsible for further oxidation of verbenol to verbenone. The reaction environment was ensured by the acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH = 5). Optimum values for the experimental parameters (e.g., concentration of 2-1B peroxidase, M120 laccase, and H2O2) were set up. The biocatalytic cascade process was monitored for 24 h in order to evaluate the process pathway. Maximum performance under optimum conditions was reached after 5 h incubation time (e.g., 80% (+)-α-pinene conversion and 70% yield in verbenol). Therefore, the developed biocatalytic cascade system offered promising perspectives for (+)-α-pinene valorization.


Introduction
Currently, terpenes, especially monoterpenes, represent one of the most chemically approached class of natural compounds with extensive therapeutic properties and, generally, many examples of involvement in industrial applications. Therefore, monoterpenes have been brought into the spotlight due to their role in the prevention or therapy of many diseases [1,2]; in insecticidal and antimicrobial activity, as being useful in preserving crops and soil cultures [3]; or in the mass production of valuable natural precursors, flavors, and fragrances [4]. α-Pinene is one of these monoterpenoid compounds that can be found in turpentine resin together with β-pinene, limonene, 3-carene, myrcene, camphene, and p-cymene [5]. More than 160,000 tons per year of α-pinene accumulate as a basic component of turpentine from wood and citrus oil processing [6]. Additionally, the pulp and paper industry offers generous turpentine waste with a high content of α-pinene [7]. Thus, the valorization of the industrial residues of α-pinene, which have demonstrated good volatility and organoleptic properties, is a real requirement of today's industry.
Oxidative functionalization of α-pinene leading to chemical products capitalized on the natural derivatives useful as flavors and fragrances is considered an alternative with high potential in industrial applications [8]. Oxidative transformations of α-pinene can take the following two competitive routes: (1) epoxidation of the double bond of the cycle leading to pinene epoxide and further to varied monoterpenoid derivatives and (2) allylic oxidation of α-pinene by the production of verbenol-verbenone and myrtenolmyrtenal mixtures [9] (Scheme 1). Both pathways could be achieved based on conventional catalysis [8,10,11]. However, the drawbacks of a catalytic process, such as technological and environmental problems resulting from the (re)generation of the catalyst and the use of a large number of effluents [12], launch the challenge of developing new alternatives. [8,10,11]. However, the drawbacks of a catalytic process, such as technological and environmental problems resulting from the (re)generation of the catalyst and the use of a large number of effluents [12], launch the challenge of developing new alternatives. In this context, biocatalysis is a valuable solution offering a green alternative for α-pinene oxidation and leading to (oxi)derivatives valuable for the flavors and fragrances industry. Taking into account the allylic oxidation based on biocatalytic transformation, the reported systems are mainly based on a whole-cell biocatalyst [5,7,[13][14][15][16]. An intergeneric hybrid produced by the protoplastic fusion of Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Penicillium digitatum (P. digitatum) biotransformed (−)-α-pinene into (−)-verbenol, with an overall yield of 60%, compared to the strains of the parental cells (10% and 15% yield in (−)-verbenol for A. niger and P. digitatum, respectively) [13]. In plant cell cultures, Penicillium brachyceras showed substrate specificity for (−)-α-pinene, oxidizing it to verbenone with a conversion of 81%, while Rauwolfia sellowii was capable of 38% conversion of both α-pinene enantiomers [14]. Bacteria formed by the degradation of citrus fruits with a strain coming from Gluconobacter japonicus proved the ability to convert 96% of (+)-α-pinene into verbenone during eight days of incubation [7]. Additionally, both enantiomers of α-pinene and their racemic mixture allowed to sequentially produce verbenol by treatment with Picea abies cell suspension (35% substrate conversion). The prolongation of the reaction time led to verbenone as the main product (68% substrate conversion) [15]. Interestingly, Picea abies-immobilized cells tend to preferably produce pinocarveol and α-terpineol over verbenol [5]. Allylic hydroxylation of triterpenes was achieved by incubating the substrate with bacterial culture of Bacillus megaterium (considering P450s monooxygenase activity). Erythrodiol, uvaol, and hederagenin as substrates allowed to produce the corresponding hydroxy derivatives with yields ranging between 10% and 30% [16]. Therefore, there is a great diversity of microorganisms that contribute to the biotransformation of terpenes (e.g., α-pinene) into natural flavoring compounds. However, several shortcomings (e.g., the cytotoxicity of precursors and products, the difference in hydrophobicity between organic compounds and the growth medium, etc., [17]) have been also noticed as limiting the applicability of microorganism-based biocatalysis.
Enzyme biocatalysis could be a solution for avoiding the drawbacks of microorganism-based biocatalysis presented previously. Cytochrome hem-monooxygenase P450cam from Pseudomonas putida has been reported in the literature for the specific oxidation of αpinene. The major product was verbenol (86% selectivity in verbenol with only 5% selectivity in verbenone) [18]. Our research group reported previously the biocatalytic activity of the modified unspecific peroxidase (PaDa-I as unspecific peroxidase variant expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, characterized by the intermediate catalytic behavior between P450 monooxygenase and hem-peroxidase) [19] for the allylic oxidation of α-pinene [20]. Taking into account the allylic oxidation based on biocatalytic transformation, the reported systems are mainly based on a whole-cell biocatalyst [5,7,[13][14][15][16]. An intergeneric hybrid produced by the protoplastic fusion of Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Penicillium digitatum (P. digitatum) biotransformed (−)-α-pinene into (−)-verbenol, with an overall yield of 60%, compared to the strains of the parental cells (10% and 15% yield in (−)verbenol for A. niger and P. digitatum, respectively) [13]. In plant cell cultures, Penicillium brachyceras showed substrate specificity for (−)-α-pinene, oxidizing it to verbenone with a conversion of 81%, while Rauwolfia sellowii was capable of 38% conversion of both αpinene enantiomers [14]. Bacteria formed by the degradation of citrus fruits with a strain coming from Gluconobacter japonicus proved the ability to convert 96% of (+)-α-pinene into verbenone during eight days of incubation [7]. Additionally, both enantiomers of α-pinene and their racemic mixture allowed to sequentially produce verbenol by treatment with Picea abies cell suspension (35% substrate conversion). The prolongation of the reaction time led to verbenone as the main product (68% substrate conversion) [15]. Interestingly, Picea abies-immobilized cells tend to preferably produce pinocarveol and α-terpineol over verbenol [5]. Allylic hydroxylation of triterpenes was achieved by incubating the substrate with bacterial culture of Bacillus megaterium (considering P450s monooxygenase activity). Erythrodiol, uvaol, and hederagenin as substrates allowed to produce the corresponding hydroxy derivatives with yields ranging between 10% and 30% [16]. Therefore, there is a great diversity of microorganisms that contribute to the biotransformation of terpenes (e.g., α-pinene) into natural flavoring compounds. However, several shortcomings (e.g., the cytotoxicity of precursors and products, the difference in hydrophobicity between organic compounds and the growth medium, etc., [17]) have been also noticed as limiting the applicability of microorganism-based biocatalysis.
Enzyme biocatalysis could be a solution for avoiding the drawbacks of microorganismbased biocatalysis presented previously. Cytochrome hem-monooxygenase P450 cam from Pseudomonas putida has been reported in the literature for the specific oxidation of αpinene. The major product was verbenol (86% selectivity in verbenol with only 5% selectivity in verbenone) [18]. Our research group reported previously the biocatalytic activity of the modified unspecific peroxidase (PaDa-I as unspecific peroxidase variant expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, characterized by the intermediate catalytic behavior between P450 monooxygenase and hem-peroxidase) [19] for the allylic oxidation of α-pinene [20]. The biocatalytic oxidation was performed in a biphasic system in order to avoid the inconvenience of low solubility of the substrate or products in aqueous phase. System performance reached maximum 68% α-pinene conversion and 44% yield in verbenol [20].
Recently, a two-step biocatalytic process of allylic oxidation based on the cascading action of modified P450 monooxygenase and alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has been reported [21]. Isophorone substrate as one valuable monooxygenated terpenoid was transformed into ketoisophorone, useful as a building block in vitamin synthesis. The P450 mutant successfully contributes to the formation of 4-hydroxy-α-isophorone (99% catalytic performance expressed in total turnover numbers), further oxidized by alcohol dehydrogenase to the corresponding keto derivative (maximum 92% conversion of substrate) [21].
In this study, we report the development of a linear bi-enzymatic cascade process based on the synergistic communication between versatile peroxidase (2-1B peroxidase) and laccase (M120 laccase) enzymes for the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene leading predominantly to verbenol. The oxidative process involves the following two steps: (i) the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene mainly assisted by 2-1B peroxidase to verbenol as the principal reaction product and (ii) the oxidation of verbenol directed to verbenone in the presence of M120 laccase. H 2 O 2 was added as oxidation reagent for the peroxidase enzyme, while dissolved O 2 in the reaction phase was required by the laccase enzyme. The 2-1B peroxidase mutant is an extracellular versatile peroxidase found in Pleurotus eryngii, expressed in Saccharomices cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) as a stable and highly reactive enzyme, requiring stoichiometric concentrations of H 2 O 2 . 2-1B peroxidase was prepared by the modification of the hydrophobic core of the putative peptide, contributing to the improvement of the catalytic efficiency for peroxidative reactions and oxygen transfer [22]. The ability to retain its catalytic activity even at higher concentrations of H 2 O 2 was improved due to the implied structural modifications [19]. Furthermore, the introduced mutations increased enzyme thermostability and oxidation activity even in alkaline conditions. Maximum activity for the 2-1B peroxidase variant was reported at pH 5 and was taken as reference value. Additionally, a residual activity was noticed up to pH 9 [23].
In contrast, laccases represent a particular group of blue copper oxidative enzymes. They are glycoproteins, ubiquitous in nature, found in plants and in almost every type of fungus. Laccase-catalyzed reactions are carried out through the mono-electronic oxidation of a substrate molecule (aromatic or aliphatic phenols/amines) to a corresponding reactive radical [24]. The redox process is performed by assisting the cluster of four copper atoms, which forms the catalytic core of the enzyme. However, frequently, the substrate of interest cannot be oxidized directly by laccases, either because the substrate is too large to be integrated into the active site of this enzyme, or because the enzyme has high redox potential. These limitations might be corrected by mediators, while the oxidized radical state will be able to interact with the enzyme with high redox potential. Specifically, laccases may be used in connection with peroxidases, to produce mild oxidation reactions with the formation of alcohol or aldehyde/ketone products [25].
In the present study, the use of a cascade process catalyzed by the enzymatic mixture (1-2B peroxidase and M120 laccase) was strongly related to the idea of improving the catalytic activity of the peroxidase enzyme in oxidative conditions with the support of the laccase enzyme. Experimental approaches on setting up the cascade system were performed for the oxidative biotransformation of (+)-α-pinene directed preponderantly to the verbenol product and further oxidized to verbenone. Besides these, myrtenol and myrtenal were also considered as secondary products of the process. Optimization of the biocatalytic process was performed considering the enzymatic (peroxidase and laccase) biocatalyst and oxidant (H 2 O 2 ) concentrations. Additionally, monitoring in time of the (+)-α-pinene biotransformation was achieved.

Results and Discussion
Cascade biocatalysis was set up and evaluated for (+)-α-pinene oxidation. The biocatalytic system contained an enzyme cocktail of 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase used as bi-enzyme biocatalyst and H 2 O 2 as oxidation reagent specific for the peroxidase enzyme. Additionally, 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH = 5) guaranteed the acidic environment suitable for optimum catalytic activity of 2-1B peroxidase. Kinetic measurements were performed for both enzymes separately and in mixture. Kinetic/catalytic constants (K m , k cat and k cat /K m ) were calculated in order to evaluate the activity of both enzymes (Table 1). 2-1B peroxidase exhibited higher catalytic efficiency (k cat /K m ) than M120 laccase (5.30 ± 0.92 and 0.91 ± 0.09 s −1 mM −1 of 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase, respectively). Noticeably, the catalytic efficiency of 2-1B peroxidase was improved when M120 laccase was added to the reaction mixture.

Influence of 2-1B Peroxidase on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
Different concentrations of 2-1B peroxidase were tested in the proposed biocatalytic system. The experimental results are presented in Figure 1. An upward trend was observed for substrate conversion when the concentration of 2-1B peroxidase increased from 0 to 1.29 U/mL (12.97 U/mL of stock solution of 2-1B peroxidase). A higher concentration than 1.29 U/mL (2.59 U/mL) did not substantially affect the substrate conversion. The content in verbenol remained constant (~70% selectivity in verbenol) up to 0.65 U/mL of 2-1B peroxidase. Then, the formation of verbenol decreased up to 2.59 U/mL 2-1B peroxidase concentration. Over the same time, the production of verbenone and the other oxidative derivatives, such as myrtenol and myrtenal, was favored for high concentrations of the peroxidase enzyme (>0.65 U/mL). However, secondary oxidation products (e.g., myrtenol and myrtenal) cumulated no more than 10-15% abundance in the products' mixture. All the reaction products were identified based on GC-MS (gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection) analysis and quantified using HPLC-DAD (high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection) analysis. It can be seen that the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene depended directly on the 2-1B peroxidase concentration (i.e., the total number of peroxidase catalytic sites). In this context, 1.29 U/mL was considered the optimal concentration of 2-1B peroxidase as a compromise between (+)-α-pinene conversion and verbenol production (80% (+)-α-pinene conversion and 68% selectivity in verbenol, as the favored product). This peroxidase concentration was used for the next experiments. It must be noted that, for 0 U/mL 2-1B peroxidase, only 6% of substrate was transformed. Therefore, M120 laccase (216 POU/mL) exhibited low catalytic capacity for the oxidation of (+)-α-pinene in the absence of the peroxidase enzyme.

Influence of M120 Laccase on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
The biocatalytic cascade process was performed varying the concentration of laccase in the range of 0-216 POU/mL. The results are shown in Figure 2. Low concentrations of M120 laccase (<43 POU/mL M120 laccase) did not exhibit any effects on the (+)-αpinene transformation. High laccase concentrations (43-216 POU/mL) led to the strong improvement of (+)-α-pinene oxidation. Therefore, the conversion of (+)-α-pinene was improved from 51% to 80% (+)-α-pinene when the M120 laccase concentration varied in the range of 43-216 POU/mL. No visible modification was observed in terms of verbenol production (~70% selectivity in verbenol for all the cases). However, a slight increase in selectivity in myrtenol and myrtenal was observed for the variation of M120 laccase concentration. In the absence of M120 laccase, 52% (+)-α-pinene was converted with the preferential formation of verbenol, indicating the capacity of the 2-1B peroxidase to catalyze the (+)-α-pinene oxidation ( Figure 2).

Influence of M120 Laccase on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
The biocatalytic cascade process was performed varying the concentration of laccase in the range of 0-216 POU/mL. The results are shown in Figure 2. Low concentrations of M120 laccase (<43 POU/mL M120 laccase) did not exhibit any effects on the (+)-α-pinene transformation. High laccase concentrations (43-216 POU/mL) led to the strong improvement of (+)-α-pinene oxidation. Therefore, the conversion of (+)-α-pinene was improved from 51% to 80% (+)-α-pinene when the M120 laccase concentration varied in the range of 43-216 POU/mL. No visible modification was observed in terms of verbenol production (~70% selectivity in verbenol for all the cases). However, a slight increase in selectivity in myrtenol and myrtenal was observed for the variation of M120 laccase concentration. In the absence of M120 laccase, 52% (+)-α-pinene was converted with the preferential formation of verbenol, indicating the capacity of the 2-1B peroxidase to catalyze the (+)-αpinene oxidation (Figure 2).
The use of M120 laccase for (+)-α-pinene oxidative biotransformation allowed a significant improvement in the substrate conversion (maximum to 80% (+)-α-pinene conversion), preserving the preferred product as verbenol (around 70% selectivity in verbenol for 216 POU/mL M120 laccase activity). This means that M120 laccase supported the peroxidase activity. Additionally, the evaluation of the catalytic efficiency of 2-1B peroxidase in the presence and absence of M120 laccase confirms the laccase contribution (Table 1). Based on the experimental results, we presumed that the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene to verbenol was catalyzed predominantly by 2-1B peroxidase, whereas M120 laccase favoring the oxidation of verbenol to verbenone allowed the equilibrium of the allylic oxidation to move to a greater substrate consumption. Similarly, the myrtenol conversion into myrtenal could also have aninfluence on this process, but with a small contribution since the myrtenol-myrtenal transformation was achieved with low efficiency.

Influence of H2O2 on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
H2O2 concentration was also varied in the biocatalytic system. The experimental results in terms of (+)-α-pinene conversion and verbenol/verbenone formation were considered. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 3. When H2O2 concentration was raised from 0.13 to 1.28 M, the (+)-α-pinene conversion exhibited an ascending trend varying from 52% to 80%, respectively. Additionally, an increase in the selectivity for verbenol was achieved, whereas the selectivity in verbenone decreased. The ratio between verbenol and verbenone indicated that the peroxidase step gained in the presence of laccase when H2O2 concentration was raised to 1.28 M. No visible variation of selectivity in myrtenol/myrtenal (<10% selectivity in myrtenol/myrtenal) was noted for all the cases.
2-1B peroxidase used H2O2 as the source of OH• radicals in order to insert the OH group onto the substrate structure in the proximity of the carbon double bound (allylic oxidation). It is already known that high concentrations of H2O2 can usually inhibit the catalytic activity of the common peroxidase enzyme. However, 2-1B peroxidase is a mutant of versatile peroxidase that involves structural modifications in order to suppress the enzyme inhibition at high concentrations of H2O2 [19]. Consequently, 2-1B peroxidase preserved its catalytic activity for H2O2 concentrations up to 1.28 M. Stability tests confirmed the resistance of 2-1B peroxidase at high H2O2 concentrations ( Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). It should be mentioned that H2O2 is also a competitive inhibitor of M120 lac- The use of M120 laccase for (+)-α-pinene oxidative biotransformation allowed a significant improvement in the substrate conversion (maximum to 80% (+)-α-pinene conversion), preserving the preferred product as verbenol (around 70% selectivity in verbenol for 216 POU/mL M120 laccase activity). This means that M120 laccase supported the peroxidase activity. Additionally, the evaluation of the catalytic efficiency of 2-1B peroxidase in the presence and absence of M120 laccase confirms the laccase contribution (Table 1). Based on the experimental results, we presumed that the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene to verbenol was catalyzed predominantly by 2-1B peroxidase, whereas M120 laccase favoring the oxidation of verbenol to verbenone allowed the equilibrium of the allylic oxidation to move to a greater substrate consumption. Similarly, the myrtenol conversion into myrtenal could also have an influence on this process, but with a small contribution since the myrtenol-myrtenal transformation was achieved with low efficiency.

Influence of H 2 O 2 on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
H 2 O 2 concentration was also varied in the biocatalytic system. The experimental results in terms of (+)-α-pinene conversion and verbenol/verbenone formation were considered. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 3. When H 2 O 2 concentration was raised from 0.13 to 1.28 M, the (+)-α-pinene conversion exhibited an ascending trend varying from 62% to 80%, respectively. Additionally, an increase in the selectivity for verbenol was achieved, whereas the selectivity in verbenone decreased. The ratio between verbenol and verbenone indicated that the peroxidase step gained in the presence of laccase when H 2 O 2 concentration was raised to 1.28 M. No visible variation of selectivity in myrtenol/myrtenal (<10% selectivity in myrtenol/myrtenal) was noted for all the cases.
2-1B peroxidase used H 2 O 2 as the source of OH• radicals in order to insert the OH group onto the substrate structure in the proximity of the carbon double bound (allylic oxidation). It is already known that high concentrations of H 2 O 2 can usually inhibit the catalytic activity of the common peroxidase enzyme. However, 2-1B peroxidase is a mutant of versatile peroxidase that involves structural modifications in order to suppress the enzyme inhibition at high concentrations of H 2 O 2 [19]. Consequently, 2-1B peroxidase preserved its catalytic activity for H 2 O 2 concentrations up to 1.28 M. Stability tests confirmed the resistance of 2-1B peroxidase at high H 2 O 2 concentrations ( Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). It should be mentioned that H 2 O 2 is also a competitive inhibitor of M120 laccase. However, M120 laccase exhibited appreciable catalytic efficiency at high H 2 O 2 concentrations. Consequently, the enzymatic cooperativity of both enzymes was observed, leading to the promising degree of (+)-α-pinene biotransformation (80% (+)-αpinene conversion, and 68% and 20% selectivity in verbenol and verbenone, respectively).

Influence of Reaction Time on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
To evaluate the global performance of the biocatalytic cascade process, 10 reaction mixtures with the same composition were prepared and incubated under similar experimental conditions. The samples were analyzed at different moments over 24 h. Figure 4 presents the corresponding results. For the first hour of reaction, no visible modifications in the (+)-α-pinene conversion and product yield were noticed. Subsequently, a rapid increase in (+)-α-pinene conversion was registered for the next 4 h. Therefore, the maximum transformation of (+)-α-pinene (around 80% (+)-α-pinene conversion) was achieved in 5 h incubation time. An increase in verbenol production was also noticed up to 67% yield. Simultaneously, the same ascending trend was observed for verbenone, myrtenol, and myrtenal. Subsequently, the substrate conversion remained constant followed by a slight increase in verbenol (up to 70% yield in verbenol) during the next 19 h. It should be noted that verbenol was the favored product from the first hour of the reaction time. These are clear indications that the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene dominated the cascade process from the beginning. The 2-1B peroxidase enzyme was mainly responsible for this behav-

Influence of Reaction Time on the Biocatalytic Cascade System
To evaluate the global performance of the biocatalytic cascade process, 10 reaction mixtures with the same composition were prepared and incubated under similar experimental conditions. The samples were analyzed at different moments over 24 h. Figure 4 presents the corresponding results. For the first hour of reaction, no visible modifications in the (+)-α-pinene conversion and product yield were noticed. Subsequently, a rapid increase in (+)-α-pinene conversion was registered for the next 4 h. Therefore, the maximum transformation of (+)-α-pinene (around 80% (+)-α-pinene conversion) was achieved in 5 h incubation time. An increase in verbenol production was also noticed up to 67% yield. Simultaneously, the same ascending trend was observed for verbenone, myrtenol, and myrtenal. Subsequently, the substrate conversion remained constant followed by a slight increase in verbenol (up to 70% yield in verbenol) during the next 19 h. It should be noted that verbenol was the favored product from the first hour of the reaction time. These are clear indications that the allylic oxidation of (+)-α-pinene dominated the cascade process from the beginning. The 2-1B peroxidase enzyme was mainly responsible for this behavior. Additionally, the cascade established the reactions' equilibrium after 5 h. Therefore, 5 h were enough to efficiently yield verbenol from (+)-α-pinene (around 70% yield of verbenol). Noticeably, both enzymes preserved their catalytic activity under the system conditions (88% and 95% recovery of the catalytic activity for 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase after 5 h incubation in the cascade system) ( Figure S1, Supplementary Materials).  Based on the experimental results presented in Figure 4, the mechanism of the developed process was proposed (Scheme 2). The setup system is a typical biocatalytic cascade design (as "domino" reactions [26]) with a bi-enzymatic biocatalyst (2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase). The mechanism involves the linking of individual stages of the entire chemical transformation process of (+)-α-pinene oxidation. (+)-α-Pinene, H2O2, and the enzymes were added at the beginning, leading to the formation of the verbenol product, and continuing the biocatalytic process further to verbenone formation. Moreover, myrtenol and myrtenal were produced, but with low selectivity (<10%).
The hypothetical mechanism involving the electron exchange steps is also detailed in Scheme 2. The catalytic site of 2-1B versatile peroxidase, which is essentially provided with a trivalent porphyrinic Fe III , transforms into the radical Fe IV complex after H2O2 contribution and captures the substrate susceptible to oxidation, (+)-α-pinene [27]. M120 laccase focuses on the freshly formed verbenol with a proton and electron transfer mechanism supported by acid pH 5 and the rearrangement onto the energy levels drives to the formation of verbenone [28]. Therefore, the presence of M120 laccase allowed an apparent enhancement of 2-1B peroxidase activity by favoring the substrate consumption. The conclusion is supported by both experimental sets for 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and (+)-α-pinene substrates.  Based on the experimental results presented in Figure 4, the mechanism of the developed process was proposed (Scheme 2). The setup system is a typical biocatalytic cascade design (as "domino" reactions [26]) with a bi-enzymatic biocatalyst (2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase). The mechanism involves the linking of individual stages of the entire chemical transformation process of (+)-α-pinene oxidation. (+)-α-Pinene, H 2 O 2 , and the enzymes were added at the beginning, leading to the formation of the verbenol product, and continuing the biocatalytic process further to verbenone formation. Moreover, myrtenol and myrtenal were produced, but with low selectivity (<10%).
The hypothetical mechanism involving the electron exchange steps is also detailed in Scheme 2. The catalytic site of 2-1B versatile peroxidase, which is essentially provided with a trivalent porphyrinic Fe III , transforms into the radical Fe IV complex after H 2 O 2 contribution and captures the substrate susceptible to oxidation, (+)-α-pinene [27]. M120 laccase focuses on the freshly formed verbenol with a proton and electron transfer mechanism supported by acid pH 5 and the rearrangement onto the energy levels drives to the formation of verbenone [28]. Therefore, the presence of M120 laccase allowed an apparent enhancement of 2-1B peroxidase activity by favoring the substrate consumption. The conclusion is supported by both experimental sets for 2,2 -azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and (+)-α-pinene substrates. Scheme 2. Proposed biocatalytic route of the (+)-α-pinene biotransformation leading to verbenol as principal product and verbenone as favored by-product in the bi-enzymatic cascade system; the hypothetical mechanism of the cascade process is also indicated.

Chemicals and Solutions
The reagents used in the experiments were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany: (+)-α-pinene (ρ = 0.86g/cm 3 ), H2O2 (30%), acetonitrile (99.8% purity for HPLC), sodium acetate, and glacial acetic acid for the preparation of the acetate buffer solution. The enzyme mixture contains 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase. 2-1B peroxidase was kindly offered by Dr. Miguel Alcalde from the Biocatalysis Department affiliated with the Catalysis Institute of CSIC, Madrid, Spain. 2-1B peroxidase was prepared as a mutant of versatile peroxidase from Pleurotus eryngii expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. It was obtained synthetically by modifying the hydrophobic part around the catalytic zone of the putative peroxidase enzyme. The enzymatic activity was estimated at 12.97 U/mL. M120 laccase (thermostable, extracted from the Trametes sp. fungal family) was offered by Dr. Fumiaki Ito from Amano EnzymeEurope Limited (Oxfordshire, UK). The enzyme activity indicated by the provider was 108,000 POU/g. Acetate buffer was prepared by dissolving 1.36 g of sodium acetate in 100 mL deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 5 by adding glacial acetic acid.

Chemicals and Solutions
The reagents used in the experiments were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany: (+)-α-pinene (ρ = 0.86g/cm 3 ), H 2 O 2 (30%), acetonitrile (99.8% purity for HPLC), sodium acetate, and glacial acetic acid for the preparation of the acetate buffer solution. The enzyme mixture contains 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase. 2-1B peroxidase was kindly offered by Dr. Miguel Alcalde from the Biocatalysis Department affiliated with the Catalysis Institute of CSIC, Madrid, Spain. 2-1B peroxidase was prepared as a mutant of versatile peroxidase from Pleurotus eryngii expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. It was obtained synthetically by modifying the hydrophobic part around the catalytic zone of the putative peroxidase enzyme. The enzymatic activity was estimated at 12.97 U/mL. M120 laccase (thermostable, extracted from the Trametes sp. fungal family) was offered by Dr. Fumiaki Ito from Amano Enzyme Europe Limited (Oxfordshire, UK). The enzyme activity indicated by the provider was 108,000 POU/g. Acetate buffer was prepared by dissolving 1.36 g of sodium acetate in 100 mL deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 5 by adding glacial acetic acid.

Enzyme Activity
Kinetic constants of both enzymes (2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase) were determined spectrophotometrically using ABTS (2,2 -azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6sulfonic acid) diammonium salt) as substrate according to the standard method [29]. The activity assays were carried out in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH = 5) for substrate concentrations in the range of 10-600 µM and 8 mM H 2 O 2 (for 2-1B peroxidase). The absorbance was recorded at 420 nm (ε = 36,000 M −1 cm −1 ). Kinetic constants (K m ) for both 2-1B peroxidase and M120 laccase (Table 1) were calculated assuming that a one-side saturation ligand was binding to the active site of the enzyme. For the mixture of both enzymes, an apparent kinetic constant of 2-1B peroxidase was calculated using the ABTS-based protocol as in the previous cases and mimicking the conditions of the biocatalytic cascade system in terms of the 2-1B peroxidase/M120 laccase ratio. Furthermore, k cat and k cat /K m were calculated using the results of the ABTS analysis (Table 1). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Preparation of the Reaction Mixture
The reaction sample was prepared by mixing the reactants and biocatalysts at certain amounts in the solution of 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH = 5), leading to a composition of 0.63 M (+)-α-pinene, 0-2.59 U/mL 2-1B peroxidase, 0.13-1.28 M H 2 O 2 , and 0-216 POU/mL M120 laccase. The total volume of the reaction mixture was 500 µL. All experiments were performed in duplicate (relative standard deviation (RDS) < 20%).
The reaction mixture was incubated at 40 • C for a maximum of 24 h under stirring (1000 rpm) conditions. After the reaction, the sample was cooled to room temperature. Before high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis, the sample was treated with 250 µL acetonitrile to precipitate the enzymes and achieve the proper phase compatible with the mobile phase of the HPLC system. Then, the obtained mixture was vortexed for 10 min. The enzymes precipitated in the presence of the organic solvent. The centrifugation step allowed to remove the precipitate and to collect the supernatant for HPLC analysis. Moreover, the supernatant was passed through 0.2 µm porosity microfilters just before analysis in order to ensure a homogeneous sample phase.
Stability tests of both enzymes separately and in mixture were performed in order to evaluate the recovery of the enzyme activity. The enzyme(s) and H 2 O 2 were added to the acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH = 5) at the same ratio as for the reaction mixture and incubated for 24 h. Aliquots were collected from time to time and analyzed using the ABTS protocol. Recovered activity of the enzymes was calculated as the ratio between detected activity at the specific time and the initial activity.