MnS-Nanoparticles-Decorated Three-Dimensional Graphene Hybrid as Highly E ﬃ cient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Oxygen Reduction Reaction

: The search for renewable energy resources has attracted considerable research interests in electrochemical reactions of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) that are essential for fuel cells. Earth-abundant, eco-friendly and cost-e ﬀ ective transition metal compounds are emerging candidates as electrocatalysts in these reactions. Herein, we report the growth of manganese sulﬁde nanoparticles on three-dimensional graphene, through an easy, progressive successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method, where manganese sulﬁde nanoparticles (MnS-NPs), diameter of 4–5 nm are homogeneously decorated on the 3D graphene matrix. The formed hybrid shows improved HER activity in 0.1 M KOH when compared to bulk MnS. Moreover, MnS-NPs@3DG is also active in catalyzing ORR, qualifying it as a new type of bifunctional electrocatalyst in alkaline media.


Introduction
The ongoing depletion of fossil fuels has demanded an urgent development in more sustainable renewable energy sources. In particular, molecular hydrogen is short-listed as an eco-friendly energy conveyer to potentially meet the over-expanding energy needs [1,2]. The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is pivotal to electrochemical splitting of water into H 2 and O 2 as an inexpensive and viable route to subsequent hydrogen fuels [3][4][5][6]. Normally, catalysts are required to reduce the overpotential (η) to drive HER at a relatively low potential with an appreciable rate. To date, Pt remains as the most efficient HER electrocatalyst, but the price and scarcity of Pt seriously limit its practical applications [7][8][9][10]. Therefore, finding alternative cost-effective electrocatalysts from earth-abundant elements is of the utmost importance [11]. Recently, transition metals and their compounds including borides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides, oxides, sulfides and selenides emerged as efficient electrocatalysts for HER [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In particular, Mn-based compounds have attracted considerable interests owing to their low cost and relatively high abundance. Generally, electrocatalytic activities can be manipulated on two aspects, i.e., chemical compositional tuning by doping and morphology control for a judiciously designed nanostructurized electrode [19][20][21][22][23]. For example, Li et al. solvothermally synthesized hexagram

Results and Discussion
The morphology of the resulted MnS-NPs@3DG was viewed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM image in Figure 1a reveals the interconnecting cross-linked feature of graphene sheets into a three-dimensional monolith, which was rich in pores of different sizes ranging from sub-micrometer to several micrometers. For nanoparticle loading by the SILAR process, the time of dipping/drying and the number of SILAR cycles were strictly controlled to ensure even distribution of nanoparticles on the graphene foam. As presented in Figure 1b, the surface of the 3D graphene framework became rougher after the deposition of MnS-NPs, and element mapping in Figure 1c endorses the subsistence of carbon, manganese, sulfur and oxygen in the as-prepared nanocomposite. MnS-NPs were further characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Figure 1d). Owing to the transparent nature of thin graphene sheets in the composite, MnS-NPs can be well resolved on surface of graphene. The HRTEM images in Figure 1e revealed that the size of nanoparticles was around 4-5 nm with 0.299 nm d-spacing paralleled to (101) plane of MnS [35]. In order to optimize the catalytic activity of the hybrid catalyst, SILAR cycles of 1, 3, 5 and 10 were applied to yield samples denoted as SILSR-1, SILAR-3, SILAR-5 and SILAR-10. It is found that the number of SILAR cycles is a crucial parameter to control aggregation of MnS-NPs on the 3DG network, and formation of MnS-NPs aggregates on the surface of the graphene framework may block pores of the graphene foam ( Figure S1). Therefore, the number of SILAR cycles was optimized as 5, where sufficient MnS-NPs could be anchored on the 3DG network without interfering electron transport or electrolyte diffusion through the nanocomposite toward efficiently catalyzing the HER [36].
The structure of the MnS-NPs@3DG was probed by the x-ray diffraction technique. Figure 2a compares XRD configurations of the as-prepared composite with the 3DG. A typical diffraction peak at 2θ of~26 • was observed in the 3DG, corresponding to the diffraction between the (002) plane of the graphene. In addition, the MnS-NPs@3DG also shows other characteristic peaks at 2θ of 27.6 • , 29.4 • , 45.7 • , 49.5 • and 54.1 • , confirming the formation of γ-MnS (JPCD: . XPS was further carried out to evaluate the bonding characteristics of MnS-NPs@3DG. The atomic ratio of Mn to S is 1.02: 1 (Figure 2b), well matching the stoichiometric ratio of MnS. Additionally, the high-resolution S spectrum in Figure 2c shows distinctive S2p 3/2 peak at the binding energy of 163.6 eV, which originated from the sulfur in MnS [37] and high-resolution Mn spectrum exhibits two main peaks of Mn2p 3/2 and Mn2p 1/2 at 641.8 eV and 653.7 eV, respectively, with a satellite feature of Mn 2+ situated at 647 eV in Figure 2d [38,39]. Furthermore, N 2 adsorption and desorption experiments were conducted (Figure 2e) and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area of MnS-NP@3DG was determined as 134.3 m 2 g −1 , which was significantly larger than that of the bulk MnS (32.5 m 2 g −1 ) due to the benefit of porous 3D support to improve the specific surface area. Meanwhile, MnS-NPs@3DG has a pore size of 4 nm (Figure 2f), which may cause an easy flow of electrolytic species during the HER process. The structure of the MnS-NPs@3DG was probed by the x-ray diffraction technique. Figure 2a compares XRD configurations of the as-prepared composite with the 3DG. A typical diffraction peak at 2θ of ~26° was observed in the 3DG, corresponding to the diffraction between the (002) plane of the graphene. In addition, the MnS-NPs@3DG also shows other characteristic peaks at 2θ of 27.6°, 29.4°, 45.7°, 49.5° and 54.1°, confirming the formation of γ-MnS (JPCD: 40-1289). XPS was further carried out to evaluate the bonding characteristics of MnS-NPs@3DG. The atomic ratio of Mn to S is 1.02: 1 (Figure 2b), well matching the stoichiometric ratio of MnS. Additionally, the high-resolution S spectrum in Figure 2c shows distinctive S2p3/2 peak at the binding energy of 163.6 eV, which originated from the sulfur in MnS [37] and high-resolution Mn spectrum exhibits two main peaks of Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2 at 641.8 eV and 653.7 eV, respectively, with a satellite feature of Mn 2+ situated at 647 eV in Figure 2d [38,39]. Furthermore, N2 adsorption and desorption experiments were conducted ( Figure 2e) and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area of MnS-NP@3DG was determined as 134.3 m 2 g −1 , which was significantly larger than that of the bulk MnS (32.5 m 2 g −1 ) due to the benefit of porous 3D support to improve the specific surface area. Meanwhile, MnS-NPs@3DG The electrocatalytic HER activity of catalysts was conducted in alkaline solution (0.1 M KOH) with a typical three-electrode system. SEM images in Figure 3a−d reveal that the morphology of the catalyst changed from slightly rough to large aggregates with the increased number of SILAR cycles, and such a morphological change significantly influenced the catalytic performance in HER. As shown in Figure 3e, as the loading amount of electrocatalytically active MnS-NPs increased, the value of the electrocatalytic current density (J cat ) dramatically improved until SILAR cycles reached 5. Interestingly, a poor catalytic current was observed in SILAR-10, and this could be attributed to the excessive stackings of the highly resistive MnS-NPs that impede electron flow across the electrode to the catalyst/electrolyte interface. While the number of SILAR cycles was optimized as 5, the effect of mass loading was further studied in Figure S2, and an optimal catalyst loading of~0.28 mg cm −2 was obtained. The observed inferior performance with a larger catalytic loading may be attributed to impeded electron transport through a thicker catalyst layer and/or agglomeration of catalytic mesopores with inefficient electrolytic flow through the catalyst on the electrode surface.
Catalysts 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 14 has a pore size of 4 nm (Figure 2f), which may cause an easy flow of electrolytic species during the HER process. Figure 4a plots comparative polarization curves for bulk MnS, 3DG and MnS-NPs@3DG, respectively. The current density for bulk MnS was 8.8 mA cm −2 at an over-potential of 800 mV, and its poor HER catalytic activity may be attributed to lack of catalytic surface area and conductivity. In comparison, cathodic catalytic current for MnS-NPs@3DG initiated at −230 mV ( Figure S3), and after this potential, J cat sharply increased to about 142 mA cm −2 at an overpotential of 490 mV. Such an improvement in catalytic activity is a result of electrical coupling of catalytic active sites with 3D interconnected graphene sheets, thus enlarging the catalyst/electrolyte interface to promote HER and avoiding electron transport directly through intrinsically less-conductive MnS to the electrode [40]. The kinetics of the catalyzed HER were analyzed by measuring Tafel plots. As shown in Figure 4b, the calculated Tafel slope of MnS-NPs@3DG was 100 mV dec −1 approximately, while higher Tafel slopes were found for 3DG (107 mV dec −1 ) and bulk MnS (150 mV dec −1 ), implying that the effective use of a large interfacial surface area and rapid electron transportation were responsible for the better HER observed in the MnS-NPs@3DG. Meanwhile, as Tafel slope is associated with the rate-limiting step in HER, the measured Tafel slope value (100 mVdec −1 ) for MnS-NPs@3DG suggested a Volmer-Heyrosky mechanism [41]. In general, an over-potential of 274 mV was required to achieve a benchmark J cat of 10 mA cm −2 . In contrast, much higher overpotentials of 684 and 807 mV were required for 3DG and bulk MnS to generate a current density of 10 mA cm −2 (Figure 4c). Catalytic durability is another indispensable factor for effective practical usage of non-precious electrocatalysts for long-duration hydrogen production. All samples were measured by continuous cyclic voltammetric (CV) sweeps with a scan rate of 50 mV s −1 for 10,000 cycles at a selected potential range of 0.1 and −0.6 V. Figure 4d shows that the polarization curves of the MnS-NP@3DG in Cycle 1 and Cycle 10,000 were almost identical, confirming its excellent stability in catalyzing HER. Furthermore, double layer capacitance (C dl ) was estimated for bulk MnS, 3DG and MnS-NPs@3DG ( Figure 4e) [42], and a potential range was selected as 0.15 to −0.25 V due to the presence of non-faradaic current [43]. In comparison to both 3DG (3.7 mF cm −2 ) and bulk MnS (0.05 mF cm −2 ), a larger C dl (10 mF cm −2 ) was found for the MnS-NPs@3DG, proving that it exposed more active sites for electrocatalytic activity in HER. Additionally, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results in Figure 4f reveal that MnS-NPs@3DG possessed smaller faradaic impedance than bulk MnS, implying that the existence of the graphene support enhanced the interfacial surface area for rapid charge transfer in HER.
Catalysts 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 14 and such a morphological change significantly influenced the catalytic performance in HER. As shown in Figure 3e, as the loading amount of electrocatalytically active MnS-NPs increased, the value of the electrocatalytic current density (Jcat) dramatically improved until SILAR cycles reached 5. Interestingly, a poor catalytic current was observed in SILAR-10, and this could be attributed to the excessive stackings of the highly resistive MnS-NPs that impede electron flow across the electrode to the catalyst/electrolyte interface. While the number of SILAR cycles was optimized as 5, the effect of mass loading was further studied in Figure S2, and an optimal catalyst loading of ~0.28 mg cm −2 was obtained. The observed inferior performance with a larger catalytic loading may be attributed to impeded electron transport through a thicker catalyst layer and/or agglomeration of catalytic mesopores with inefficient electrolytic flow through the catalyst on the electrode surface. Figure 4a plots comparative polarization curves for bulk MnS, 3DG and MnS-NPs@3DG, respectively. The current density for bulk MnS was 8.8 mA cm −2 at an over-potential of 800 mV, and its poor HER catalytic activity may be attributed to lack of catalytic surface area and conductivity. In comparison, cathodic catalytic current for MnS-NPs@3DG initiated at −230 mV ( Figure S3), and after this potential, Jcat sharply increased to about 142 mA cm −2 at an overpotential of 490 mV. Such an improvement in catalytic activity is a result of electrical coupling of catalytic active sites with 3D interconnected graphene sheets, thus enlarging the catalyst/electrolyte interface to promote HER and avoiding electron transport directly through intrinsically less-conductive MnS to the electrode [40]. The kinetics of the catalyzed HER were analyzed by measuring Tafel plots. As shown in Figure 4b, the calculated Tafel slope of MnS-NPs@3DG was 100 mV dec −1 approximately, while higher Tafel slopes were found for 3DG (107 mV dec −1 ) and bulk MnS (150 mV dec −1 ), implying that the effective use of a large interfacial surface area and rapid electron transportation were responsible for the better HER observed in the MnS-NPs@3DG. Meanwhile, as Tafel slope is associated with the rate-limiting step in HER, the measured Tafel slope value (100 mVdec −1 ) for MnS-NPs@3DG suggested a Volmer-Heyrosky mechanism [41]. In general, an over-potential of 274 mV was required to achieve a benchmark Jcat of 10 mA cm −2 . In contrast, much higher overpotentials of 684 and 807 mV were required for 3DG and bulk MnS to generate a current density of 10 mA cm −2 (Figure 4c). Catalytic durability is another indispensable factor for effective practical usage of non-precious electrocatalysts for long-duration hydrogen production. All samples were measured by continuous cyclic voltammetric (CV) sweeps with a scan rate of 50 mV s −1 for 10,000 cycles at a selected potential range of 0.1 and −0.6 V. Figure 4d shows that the polarization curves of the MnS-NP@3DG in Cycle 1 and Cycle 10,000 were almost identical, confirming its excellent stability in catalyzing HER. Furthermore, double layer capacitance (Cdl) was estimated for bulk MnS, 3DG and MnS-NPs@3DG (Figure 4e) [42], The prepared hybrid was also active for catalyzing ORR in 0.1 M KOH solution. As depicted in Figure 5a, featureless CV response of MnS-NP@3DG was noticed in nitrogen saturated electrolyte, while a strong cathodic reductive peak appeared in oxygen saturated electrolyte, indicating that the as-prepared hybrid has potential for electrocatalytic reduction in oxygen. ORR for MnS-NPs@3DG started at~0.9 V, with well resolved reductive loop bulging at~0.75 V. In contrast, bulk MnS showed inferior ORR activity as compared to Mn-NPs@3DG, which again suggests the improved ORR catalytic activity of the as-prepared hybrid originated from good compatibility between MnS-NPs and the underlying 3DG network. For further confirmation, ORR kinetics of MnS-NP@3DG was also noted in oxygen saturated alkaline solution (0.1 M KOH) by using the rotating disk electrode (RDE) system as presented in Figure 5b. At various potentials, Koutecky−Levich (K-L) plots possessed good linearity which imply a similar electron transfer number for ORR (Figure 5c). For ORR phenomena, the slope of Koutecky-Levich plots was used to obtain the number of electrons (n) required to reduce one O 2 molecule. A value of n = 2 was calculated for MnS-NPs@3DG within the potential range of 0.2-0.5 V, signifying a specific two-electron transfer ORR process. Moreover, the MnS-NPs@3DG nanohybrid catalyst exhibited the most positive ORR onset potential of 0.9 V and a current density of 2.5 mA cm −2 at 1600 rpm (Figure 5d). The methanol crossover effect was tested in oxygen saturated alkaline solution (0.1 M KOH) to investigate the methanol tolerance of the resulting MnS-NPs@3DG catalyst. No apparent changes were observed for as-prepared MnS-NPs@3DG after adding methanol (10 vol%) showing its good methanol tolerance potential (Figure 5e). In contrast, the Pt/C catalyst showed an obvious oxidation peak under the same condition (inset of Figure 5e), further proving that the MnS-NPs@3DG nanohybrid exhibited superior methanol tolerance compared to a standard platinum-based catalyst. The CV measurements were further conducted to investigate the durability of the electrocatalyst in alkaline solution at a 50 mV s −1 scan rate. As shown in Figure 5f, polarization curves after 10,000 cycles negatively shifted 5 and 40 mV for Mns-NPs@3DG and Pt/C, respectively, highlighting the durability of the MnS-NPs@3DG catalyst in the ORR.
Catalysts 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 14 and a potential range was selected as 0.15 to −0.25 V due to the presence of non-faradaic current [43]. In comparison to both 3DG (3.7 mF cm −2 ) and bulk MnS (0.05 mF cm −2 ), a larger Cdl (10 mF cm −2 ) was found for the MnS-NPs@3DG, proving that it exposed more active sites for electrocatalytic activity in HER. Additionally, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results in Figure 4f reveal that MnS-NPs@3DG possessed smaller faradaic impedance than bulk MnS, implying that the existence of the graphene support enhanced the interfacial surface area for rapid charge transfer in HER.   Performance-based comparative study for various Mn-based catalysts have been narrated in Figure 6a,b. Owing to bifunctional electrocatalysts (HER, ORR), the tailored nanocomposite was  Figure 6a,b. Owing to bifunctional electrocatalysts (HER, ORR), the tailored nanocomposite was proven to excel over other Mn-based catalysts (Figure 6; Tables S1 and S2 Supplementary Materials). In a nut shell, well-tailored nanocomposite (MnS-NPs@3DG) showed impressive (HER, ORR) functionalities that though not comparable to Pt-based expensive catalysts yet, may helpful to curtail the expense of such an expensive metal-based catalyst as alternatives for the same purposes.

Performance-based comparative study for various Mn-based catalysts have been narrated in
Catalysts 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 14 proven to excel over other Mn-based catalysts ( Figure 6; Tables S1 and S2 Supplementary Materials). In a nut shell, well-tailored nanocomposite (MnS-NPs@3DG) showed impressive (HER, ORR) functionalities that though not comparable to Pt-based expensive catalysts yet, may helpful to curtail the expense of such an expensive metal-based catalyst as alternatives for the same purposes.

Synthesis of GO
The modified Hummer's method was adopted to synthesize graphene oxide (GO) by oxidation leading exfoliation of natural graphite flakes [44].

Synthesis of 3DG
Our previously reported method was adopted for synthesis of 3DG. In nut shell, 3 mL 6 mg mL −1 GO aqueous solution with 0.25 mL 100 mg mL −1 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) aqueous solution homogenized in a 20 mL propylene isotopic vial (internal diameter 22) at 3000 rpm stirring rate for 60s. Then, in this pre-homogenized solution, 0.4 mL Nonidet P-40 (NP-40 in 10% octylphenoxypolyethanol in aqueous media, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was added. Then, direct quenching in liquid N2 for almost 30 min was required to solidify this solution then subjected to freeze-drying for several hours to obtain GO foam (GOF) with subsequent calcination on 1000 °C for 2h in inert (Ar) environment with 5 °C/min heating rate.

Synthesis of MnS-NPs@3DG
In the present work, MnS-NPs were formed in-situ on the 3D graphene network via the SILAR method. Briefly, for the deposition of MnS-NPs, 0.1 M MnCl2·4H2O solution (pH=5.5) was used as a cationic precursor, and 0.05 M Na2S·9H2O solution (pH = 12) was used as an anionic precursor. After

Synthesis of GO
The modified Hummer's method was adopted to synthesize graphene oxide (GO) by oxidation leading exfoliation of natural graphite flakes [44].

Synthesis of 3DG
Our previously reported method was adopted for synthesis of 3DG. In nut shell, 3 mL 6 mg mL −1 GO aqueous solution with 0.25 mL 100 mg mL −1 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) aqueous solution homogenized in a 20 mL propylene isotopic vial (internal diameter 22) at 3000 rpm stirring rate for 60s. Then, in this pre-homogenized solution, 0.4 mL Nonidet P-40 (NP-40 in 10% octylphenoxypolyethanol in aqueous media, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was added. Then, direct quenching in liquid N 2 for almost 30 min was required to solidify this solution then subjected to freeze-drying for several hours to obtain GO foam (GOF) with subsequent calcination on 1000 • C for 2h in inert (Ar) environment with 5 • C/min heating rate.

Synthesis of MnS-NPs@3DG
In the present work, MnS-NPs were formed in-situ on the 3D graphene network via the SILAR method. Briefly, for the deposition of MnS-NPs, 0.1 M MnCl 2 ·4H 2 O solution (pH = 5.5) was used as a cationic precursor, and 0.05 M Na 2 S·9H 2 O solution (pH = 12) was used as an anionic precursor. After cleaning by using ethanol-water (1:1 by volume), graphene foam was desiccated in an inert environment at 60 • C for several hours. After graphene foam became completely dried, MnS-NPs were loaded as depicted in Scheme 1 by the SILAR cycle. Here, the SILAR cycle was completed successfully for the required outcomes in four steps: (1) Mn 2+ uptake: the 3DG substrate was immersed into the MnCl 2 ·4H 2 O solution for 30 s for Mn 2+ ions adsorption. (2) 1st washing: washing of substrate for 50 s was required to remove detached Mn 2+ . (3) S 2− uptake: 30 s complete immersion of substrate in Na 2 S·9H 2 O solution for ionic attachment of S 2− with ante-adsorbed Mn 2+ ions to form MnS-NPs. (4) 2nd washing: washing of substrate for 50 s was required to drench as well as to remove unreacted S 2− ions on the surface of Mn 2+ embellished 3DG. Lastly, before characterization of the sample, the as-formed samples were desiccated at 60 • C for 3 h. For comparison, the SILAR process was repeated 1, 3, 5 and 10 times to yield control samples of SILAR-1, SILAR-3, SILAR-5 and SILAR-10, respectively, to optimize the size of MnS-NPs and the catalytic activity of the electrocatalyst.

Material Characterization
Scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7500F, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, 7650B, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) were applied in order to confirm morphology of the as-formed product. For X-ray analysis, Rigaku Smart Lab, X-ray Diffractometer, Tokyo, Japan was used to record data. While for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), an ESCALab220i-XL electron spectrometer (VG Scientific, Waltham, USA) using 300 W Al Ka radiations was used to record data.

Electrochemical Characterization
For electrochemical characterization of the as-formed nanohybrid, standard three-electrode setup (glassy carbon, graphite rod and Ag/AgCl) was used with potentiostat (CHI 760D working station). To prepare catalytic ink of MnS-NP@3DG as a working electrode, a 20 mg sample with 3.6 mL solvent mixture (ethanol-isopropanol 3:1 by volume) and 0.4 mL nafion solution (5 wt%) was subjected to ultrasonic treatment till homogeneous ink formation. The catalyst ink (4 µl) was deposited on 3mm diametric glassy carbon electrode (GCE) (loading quantity ≈ 0.283 mg cm −2 ). Alkaline electrolyte (0.1 M KOH) was used for linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). Moreover, all data Scheme 1. Synthetic procedure for MnS-NPs@3DG by the SILAR method.

Material Characterization
Scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7500F, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, 7650B, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) were applied in order to confirm morphology of the as-formed product. For X-ray analysis, Rigaku Smart Lab, X-ray Diffractometer, Tokyo, Japan was used to record data. While for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), an ESCALab220i-XL electron spectrometer (VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using 300 W Al Ka radiations was used to record data.

Electrochemical Characterization
For electrochemical characterization of the as-formed nanohybrid, standard three-electrode set-up (glassy carbon, graphite rod and Ag/AgCl) was used with potentiostat (CHI 760D working station). To prepare catalytic ink of MnS-NP@3DG as a working electrode, a 20 mg sample with 3.6 mL solvent mixture (ethanol-isopropanol 3:1 by volume) and 0.4 mL nafion solution (5 wt%) was subjected to ultrasonic treatment till homogeneous ink formation. The catalyst ink (4 µL) was deposited on 3 mm diametric glassy carbon electrode (GCE) (loading quantity ≈ 0.283 mg cm −2 ). Alkaline electrolyte (0.1 M KOH) was used for linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). Moreover, all data were in a reversed hydrogen electrode, and IR drop corrected polarization curves were recorded. Catalytic resistance was measured within the frequency range 0.1-100 kHz by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). By using the following Equation (1), the potential was converted to the RHE scale, where E RHE is the potential vs. RHE, while E Ag/AgCl is the potential referring to Ag/AgCl. The overpotential (η) was attained by the intersection of the tangents of LSV current and the polarization curve baseline.
In order to test our as-formed catalyst for ORR, 5 µL catalytic ink was deposited onto another GCE (loading quantity ≈ 0.1 mg cm −2 ). The CV measurements were recorded in alkaline solution at 10 mV s −1 , and RDE measurements were pursued at different rotating speeds (0-2500 rpm). For comparative view, the standard Pt based catalyst was also studied. The transferred electron number (n) was calculated from the Koutecky-Levich (K-L) equation [45,46].
Mathematically, relation between current and electrode rotating speed is as follows: Where j k is the kinetic current, ω rotation rate speed of the electrode and B is the Levich slope, which is given by: Here, n describes the electron number for the reduction in one O 2 molecule, F is the Faraday constant (F = 96,485 C mol −1 ), Do 2 is the diffusion coefficient of O 2 in 0.1 M KOH (Do 2 = 1.9 × 10 −5 cm 2 s −1 ), ν is the kinematics viscosity (v = 0.01 cm 2 s −1 ) and Co 2 is O 2 concentration in solution (Co 2 = 1.2 × 10 −6 mol cm −3 ). When the rotating speed of the electrode is expressed in rpm, the constant 0.2 has been used.

Conclusions
In summary, MnS nanoparticles were synthesized and loaded on 3D graphene foam in one step by a cost-effective and eco-friendly SILAR method for catalyzing HER and ORR. Taking advantage of the three-dimensional structure of graphene as a superior current acquirer and catalyst carrier, the MnS-NPs@3D graphene featured much lower overpotential than analogues of bulk MnS. Additionally, its ORR activity was well proved, enabling it as a new kind of bifunctional catalyst. The current work may pave a new way for other metal chalcogenide-based low-cost bifunctional catalyst alternatives to noble metal compounds for electrochemical applications.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.