Next Article in Journal
Reversal of Prediabetes in Saudi Adults: Results from an 18 Month Lifestyle Intervention
Previous Article in Journal
Commiphora myrrha Resin Alcoholic Extract Ameliorates High Fat Diet Induced Obesity via Regulation of UCP1 and Adiponectin Proteins Expression in Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/nu12030798
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples in Chinese Adults: Can Spot Urine Substitute 24-Hour Urine Samples?

by
Jianwei Xu
1,
Jiyu Zhang
2,
Min Liu
1,
Yamin Bai
1,
Xiaolei Guo
2,
Jing Dong
2,
Aiqiang Xu
2 and
Jing Wu
1,*
1
National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
2
Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(3), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030798
Submission received: 24 February 2020 / Revised: 13 March 2020 / Accepted: 17 March 2020 / Published: 18 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Several estimating equations for predicting 24-h urinary sodium (24-hUNa) excretion using spot urine (SU) samples have been developed, but have not been readily available to Chinese populations. We aimed to compare and validate the six existing methods at population level and individual level. We extracted 1671 adults eligible for both 24-h urine and SU sample collection. Mean biases (95% CI) of predicting 24-hUNa excretion using six formulas were 58.6 (54.7, 62.5) mmol for Kawasaki, −2.7 (−6.2, 0.9) mmol for Tanaka, −24.5 (−28.0, −21.0) mmol for the International Cooperative Study on Salt, Other Factors, and Blood Pressure (INTERSALT) with potassium, –26.8 (−30.1, −23.3) mmol for INTERSALT without potassium, 5.9 (2.3, 9.6) mmol for Toft, and −24.2 (−27.7, −20.6) mmol for Whitton. The proportions of relative difference >40% with the six methods were nearly a third, and the proportions of absolute difference >51.3 mmol/24-h (3 g/day salt) were more than 40%. The misclassification rate were all >55% for the six methods at the individual level. Although the Tanaka method could offer a plausible estimation for surveillance of the population sodium excretion in Shandong province, caution remains when using the Tanaka formula for other provincial populations in China. However, these predictive methods were inadequate to evaluate individual sodium excretion.

1. Introduction

The association of high salt intake with blood pressure (BP) has been widely accepted. Excessive salt intake can increase the risk of stroke and cardiovascular disease [1,2]. A diet high in sodium was one of the top three risk factors for both deaths and disability-adjusted life-years in China [3]. Mean population salt intake in China was 12–14 g/day [4], which is more than twice the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended salt intake (<5.0 g/day). Hence, salt reduction is a critical public health priority to prevent hypertension in China. WHO has recommended a 30% relative reduction in mean population salt intake by 2025. The Chinese central government targets 20% relative reduction in mean population salt intake by 2030, which is one of the key targets of Healthy China 2030. It is essential that the mean population sodium intake can be continuously monitored and tracked to meet the salt reduction target. Therefore, accurate measurements of salt intake is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of salt reduction.
There are several different methods commonly used to estimate salt intake, including food frequency questionnaires, 24-h dietary recall, and 24-h urinary sodium (24-hUNa) excretion. [5]. Until now, 24-hUNa excretion has been the most accurate method for estimating salt intake [6]. However, urine collection over a 24-h period is troublesome for participants to adhere to and researchers to conduct in epidemiological surveys. Low response rates and incomplete 24-h urine collection often occur in large-scale population surveys [7,8]. In order to solve these practical problems, some researchers have developed several formulas that may estimate 24-hUNa excretion using spot urine (SU) samples. SU sample was easier and better accepted by participants. These methods include the Kawasaki formula [9], Tanaka formula [10], INTERSALT with potassium formula (INTERSALT1) [11], INTERSALT without potassium formula (INTERSALT2) [11], Toft formula [12], and the Whitton formula [13]. These equations based on SU samples have many advantages and give hope for estimating population salt intake. This is particularly important for China, which is implementing country-level salt reduction strategies. Unfortunately, recent validation studies in the Chinese population remains controversial because the results of different studies are inconsistent. To date, whether these formulas based on SU samples may be a reasonable estimated method for Chinese population remains a key unresolved issue. Consequently, suitability and accuracy of estimation formulas need more research in the larger Chinese population.
This study aims to explore whether SU samples can perform well to estimate sodium intake both at population level and at individual level in China, with a view to evaluate whether SU samples can substitute 24-h urine samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

The article utilized participants from the final evaluation survey of the Shandong–Ministry of Health Action on Salt and Hypertension project (SMASH). The methods and preliminary results for the SMASH project have been previously published [14,15]. The final survey was conducted in Shandong province in 2016. In included 2184 subjects aged 18–69 years were invited and asked to collect SU samples and 24-h urine samples. Finally, 2043 participants completed 24-h urine samples with a participation rate at 93.5%. We excluded 368 ineligible 24-h urine samples and 4 participants missing SU samples. The eligibility of the 24-h urine samples was judged with reference to US National Institutes of Health GenSalt’s salt sensitivity-related standards. If the collection time was less than 22-h, more than two urine samples were not collected, a participant recall regarding timing or missed collections was uncertain, the urine volume was <500 mL, or urinary creatinine was not within ±2 standard deviation of the gender-specific mean, then 24-h urine samples were deemed ineligible [15]. The final analysis sample included 1671 participants.
All participants provided written informed consent. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines, and any procedures involving human subjects were approved by the ethics committee of the National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

2.2. Urine Collection and Laboratory Testing

Each respondent was provided with a plastic bottle with a cap for 24-h urine sample collection, which contained around 1.0 g of boric acid. Each respondent was given a urine collection cup and a storing SU sample tube. Participants had the procedure explained verbally and in writing for handling the SU and 24-h urine samples. One clean midstream SU sample was collected in the morning at home. Next, participants came to the investigation site with the SU sample. The 24-h urine collection began after participants emptied their bladders at the investigation site. Subsequently, participants collected all urine samples over the next 24-h. Each participant had to return to the investigation site at the same time the second day. The last urine had to be collected into the bottle. The starting and ending time of the 24-h urine collection were recorded by a supervising health professional. A questionnaire assessing the completeness of urine collection was verbally asked to each respondent after participants completed urine collection.
The 24-h urine samples from each participant were carefully stirred and the total volume was measured. A 20 mL aliquots of urine was frozen at −20 °C. All urine samples were transported frozen to the ADICON Clinical Laboratory Inc., Jinan, China, and were analyzed. The 24-hUNa and urinary potassium tests were performed with the ion-selective electrode method using the Olympus AU 680 autoanalyzer (Beckman Coulter k.k., Tokyo, Japan). Urine creatinine was tested with the enzyme method using the Olympus AU 640 analyzer (Beckman Coulter k.k., Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Other Measurements

Other measurements included height, weight and BP. Participants were advised to wear light indoor clothing without shoes before the height and weight examination. The body-mass index (BMI) was calculated according to the formula: weight (kg)/height (m)2. BP was measured using a certified automated device (HEM-7071, Omron Corporation, Dalian, China). Three readings were recorded at one-minute intervals. The average of the three measurements was used.

2.4. Estimation of 24-hUNa Excretion

24-hUNa excretion was predicted from SU samples using six existing estimation methods: Kawasaki, Tanaka, INTERSALT1, INTERSALT2, Toft, and Whitton. These formulas estimate 24-hUNa excretion based on age, height, weight, and urinary sodium and creatinine (and potassium for INTERSALT1) in SU samples. The formulas are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Participant characteristics were presented by gender, and differences between male and female subjects were tested by independent samples T-test. At population level, we firstly calculated estimated values of 24-hUNa excretion for each of the six formulas. Next, the mean bias were calculated by predicted values minus measured values of 24-hUNa excretion. Differences between predicted and measured values of 24-hUNa excretion were tested with paired samples T-test. Pearson’s r, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and scatter plots were used to assess the relation between estimated 24-hUNa from six estimation formulas and measured 24-hUNa excretion. The Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measured and estimated 24-hUNa excretion.
At individual level, the relative differences were calculated by the following formula: (predicted value-measured value/measured value). Absolute differences were analyzed according to the formula: (absolute of (predicted value-measured value)). Salt intake was calculated from estimated and measured 24-hUNa and classified into 4 categories (<9, 9–11.99, 12–14.99, and ≥15 g/day), which were easy to compare with other studies. Next, we calculated the misclassification rates. All data were analyzed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Tests for differences were two-sided and p < 0.05 was set as the significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Characteristics

A total of 1671 participants were included in this final analysis. The mean age of the subjects was 43.8±12.4 years and subjects were 50% male. Mean 24-h urine volume was 1545.2 mL. The measured mean 24-hUNa excretion was 176.4 ± 79.1 mmol/24-h, corresponding to a calculated salt intake of 10.3 ± 4.6 g/day. The characteristics of the participants are presented by gender in Table 1.

3.2. Measured Versus Estimated 24-hUNa at Population Level

The mean bias between predicted and measured 24-hUNa excretion were showed in Table 2. The mean bias for Tanaka formula was −2.7 mmol (95% CI: −6.2, 0.9 mmol), and was the smallest difference among the six predicted formulas. The largest mean bias were 58.6 mmol for Kawasaki. Using the Tanaka formula, mean estimated 24-hUNa excretion was not significantly different compared to measured values (t = −1.47, p = 0.1421). However, using the other five methods, mean predicted 24-hUNa excretion was significantly different compared to measured values (all p < 0.01).
Correlation analysis indicated that predicted 24-hUNa excretion using six methods were moderate positive correlations with measured 24-hUNa excretion. Pearson’s r between measured and estimated 24-hUNa excretion were moderate correlation (all p < 0.01). The highest Pearson’s r was 0.410 for INTERSALT1 and the lowest Pearson’s r was 0.374 for Toft. For scatter plots, see supplementary material Figure S1. ICC were also moderate (all p < 0.01). The highest ICC was 0.58 for Kawasaki, and the lowest ICC was 0.47 for Tanaka and INTERSALT2.
Bland–Altman plots showed that the Tanaka formula performed relatively accurately among the six formulas (Figure 1), which also showed that an overestimation of 24-hUNa excretion occurred at low levels of sodium excretion, whereas an underestimation occurred at high levels of sodium excretion. Compared with other formula, this trend was relatively inconspicuous in the Kawasaki formula.

3.3. Measured Versus Estimated 24-hUNa at Individual Level

The measured 24-hUNa excretion was used as the reference. The highest proportions of relative differences within ±10% were 20.6% for Tanaka, and the proportions were less than 20% for the other five formulas (Figure 2). The proportions of relative differences beyond ±40% were all >30%, and the highest proportion was 51.0% for Kawasaki. The proportions of absolute difference within 17.1 mmol/24-h (1 g/day salt) for the six formulas were 13.5%, 20.7%, 20.7%, 20.2%, 19.2%, and 20.0%, respectively. Moreover, the proportions of absolute difference beyond 51.3 mmol/24-h (3 g/day salt) for six methods were 64.2%, 44.6%, 43.2%, 43.0%, 47.8%, and 45.0%, respectively (Figure 3).
After dividing the estimated and measured 24-hUNa excretion into four groups (<9 g/day, 9–11.99 g/day, 12-14.99 g/day, ≥15 g/day), the rates of individual misclassification of salt intake groups were all >50%, with 71.8% for Kawasaki, 60.4% for Tanaka, 56.3% for INTERSALT1, 57.0% for INTERSALT2, 60.9% for Toft, and 56.7% for Whitton (Table 3).
Additional analysis was performed. Salt intake was classified into another four categories: <7 g/day, 7–9.99 g/day, 10–12.99 g/day, and ≥13 g/day. The rates of individual misclassification of salt intake groups were all >60% (see supplementary material Table S2).

4. Discussion

In the current study, we aimed to validate the six predictive equations in estimating 24-hUNa excretion using first-morning SU samples at both population and individual levels. We found that the Tanaka formula showed the best performance in estimating population mean 24-hUNa excretion. INTERSALT1, INTERSALT2, and Whitton methods significantly underestimated population mean 24-hUNa excretion. By contrast, Kawasaki and Toft equations significantly overestimated. However, all these six methods performed poorly at individual levels. The misclassification rates at individual level were all high in the six methods.
Overall, of the six equations examined, Tanaka formula performed best and had most agreement with measured 24-hUNa excretion (mean bias: −2.7 mmol/24-h, 95%; Cl: −6.2, 0.9 mmol/24-h) at population level. In contrast, using the other five methods, the estimated population mean 24-hUNa excretion had significant biases (all p < 0.01). Two previous studies reported that Tanaka performed well to predict mean population 24-hUNa excretion in both Chinese adults [16] and young adolescents [17], which was in conformance with our study. Nevertheless, other previous studies in Chinese adults found that the Kawasaki formula showed the lowest bias compared to Tanaka and INTERSALT formulas in both general [18,19,20,21] and hypertensive populations [22]. However, the Kawasaki formula performed worst among the six equations in our study. It is possible that the reason could be explained because all six methods were not developed from the Chinese population. For instance, the Kawasaki formula was developed from the Japanese population and the Toft formula was developed from the Danish population. In addition, we used the first-morning SU to assess 24-hUNa excretion, rather than the second morning urine for the Kawasaki formula.
Although the Tanaka formula performed best in predicting 24-hUNa excretion at population level among these six methods, the correlation coefficient of this method was also moderate (0.378). All the correlation of the six equations were moderate (r = 0.374–0.410, all p < 0.01; ICC = 0.47–0.58, all p < 0.01) in our study. Correlation coefficients in the present results were better compared with previous studies in Chinese adults. Bland–Altman plots of the six methods showed that these equations may overestimate a lower sodium intake and underestimate a higher level of sodium intake, which was consistent with a study conducted by Zhang et al. [16]. A meta-analysis also found similar trends [23]. Recently, a cohort study suggested that estimating salt intake using SU samples may observe change in salt intake at population level over time in Australian adults [24]. Therefore, further study into larger and different populations is warranted.
Our study found that all these six methods performed poorly at individual levels in the current population. The proportion of relative differences beyond ±40% was quite large for all six methods. Similarly, the proportions of absolute difference beyond 3 g/day salt was quite large. Although the Tanaka formula showed the best performance in predicting 24-hUNa excretion at population level, the misclassification rates at individual level were more than 60%. These results were consistent with previous studies conducted in Chinese [17,20] and in US adults with chronic kidney disease [25]. It indicated that these six formulas might be inappropriate to estimate 24-hUNa excretion at individual level.
The WHO has set voluntary targets for mean population intake to reduce by a 30% relative reduction by 2025. Because of high salt intake in China, it is very difficult for China to achieve this goal. Therefore, China has set a target for mean population salt intake by a 20% relative reduction for 2030, which is one of the key targets of Healthy China 2030. In 2019, Healthy China Action (2019–2030) was issued, which is a new guideline to promote people’s health through taking targeted measures and implementing 15 specific programs. Salt reduction action is an important initiative. We need to monitor change in Chinese population salt intake over time to evaluate the effectiveness of salt reduction programs. However, obtaining complete 24-h urine samples to estimate salt intake is challenging. Our study result showed SU samples may be a plausible method to substitute 24-h urine collection for surveillance population salt intake, although it is unacceptable for estimating individual salt intake. However, these formulas have inconsistent results in the Chinese population. The salt intake and dietary habits of people living in different regions of China vary widely [26], and this affects the accuracy of these formulas. Therefore, it might be difficult to establish a unified formula to estimate population mean salt intake in China.
Our study has two major strengths. To our knowledge, this is a reasonably large sample size and high participation rate of Chinese adults to validate the six methods in estimating 24-hUNa excretion using SU samples. In addition, we conducted strict quality controls in the 24-h urine collection step, and participants with incomplete or suspected incomplete urine collections were excluded during statistical analysis. However, there are several limitations to this study. Firstly, a single 24-hUNa excretion was not sufficient to evaluate the day-to-day variation in sodium excretion. Multiple consecutive 24-h collections were required in order to truly evaluate usual salt consumption [27]. In addition, 24-h urine samples with one occasional missing collection were eligible, and the duration of urine collection between 22 to 24 h were acceptable in the study, without any other adjustment. Secondly, we only collected the first morning spot urine to estimate 24-hUNa excretion, but the first morning urine has lower sodium and potassium concentrations compared with spot urine samples from other times [28]. Moreover, the Kawasaki equation was developed with second morning SU samples. Thirdly, our study just included one province in China to predict 24-hUNa excretion using SU samples, thus limiting the generalizability of our result. Therefore, more validating research in other provinces in China were needed.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we found the Tanaka formula could offer a plausible estimation for surveillance of the population’s sodium excretion in Shandong province. However, caution remains when using the Tanaka formula for other provincial populations in China, and further research into different populations is needed. These predictive methods were inadequate to evaluate 24-hUNa excretion at individual levels, and the 24-h urine collection remains the gold standard for individual salt intake.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/3/798/s1: Table S1. Equations used in the estimation of 24-h sodium excretion from spot urine. Figure S1. Scatter plots measured 24-hUNa excretion vs. Kawasaki (a), Tanaka (b), INTERSALT1 (c), INTERSALT2 (d), Toft (e), and Whitton (f) formulas estimated 24-hUNa excretion. The real line was the liner regression line of the scatters. Table S2. Misclassification of the six predicted formulas at individual level, n (%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.X. and J.W.; Formal analysis, J.X.; Investigation, J.Z., M.L., Y.B., X.G., and J.D.; Methodology, J.X.; Project administration, A.X. and J.W.; Writing—original draft, J.X.; Writing—review and editing, J.W. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Young Scholar Scientific Research Foundation of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant No. 2018A203), and the Provincial Technical Development Plan Grant (2012GSF11828).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the investigators and participants to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, F.J.; Macgregor, G.A. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: From evidence to implementation. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010, 52, 363–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cook, N.R.; Cutler, J.A.; Obarzanek, E.; Buring, J.E.; Rexrode, K.M.; Kumanyika, S.K.; Appel, L.J.; Whelton, P.K. Long term effects of dietary sodium reduction on cardiovascular disease outcomes: Observational follow-up of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP). BMJ 2007, 334, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhou, M.G.; Wang, H.D.; Zeng, X.Y.; Yin, P.; Zhu, J.; Chen, W.Q.; Li, X.H.; Wang, L.J.; Wang, L.M.; Liu, Y.N.; et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 362, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. He, F.J.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; MacGregor, G.A. Action on Salt China. Lancet 2018, 392, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McLean, R.M.; Farmer, V.L.; Nettleton, A.; Cameron, C.M.; Cook, N.R.; Woodward, M.; Campbell, N.R.C. TRUE Consortium (in Ternational Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt). Twenty-Four-Hour Diet recall and Diet records compared with 24-hour urinary excretion to predict an individual’s sodium consumption: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 2018, 20, 1360–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ji, C.; Sykes, L.; Paul, C.; Dary, O.; Legetic, B.; Campbell, N.R.; Cappuccio, F.P. Sub-Group for Research and Surveillance of the PAHO–WHO Regional Expert Group for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Population-wide Dietary Salt Reduction. Systematic review of studies comparing 24-hour and spot urine collections for estimating population salt intake. Rev. Panam. Salud. Publica 2012, 32, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cogswell, M.E.; Maalouf, J.; Elliott, P.; Loria, C.M.; Patel, S.; Bowman, B.A. Use of urine biomarkers to assess sodium intake: Challenges and opportunities. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015, 35, 349–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. McLean, R.M. Measuring population sodium intake: A review of methods. Nutrients 2014, 6, 4651–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kawasaki, T.; Itoh, K.; Uezono, K.; Sasaki, H. A simple method for estimating 24 h urinary sodium and potassium excretion from second morning voiding urine specimen in adults. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1993, 20, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tanaka, T.; Okamura, T.; Miura, K.; Kadowaki, T.; Ueshima, H.; Nakagawa, H.; Hashimoto, T. A simple method to estimate populational 24-h urinary sodium and potassium excretion using a casual urine specimen. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2002, 16, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Brown, I.J.; Dyer, A.R.; Chan, Q.; Cogswell, M.E.; Ueshima, H.; Stamler, J.; Elliott, P. INTERSALT Co-Operative Research Group. Estimating 24-hour urinary sodium excretion from casual urinary sodium concentrations in Western populations: The INTERSALT study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 177, 1180–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Toft, U.; Cerqueira, C.; Andreasen, A.H.; Thuesen, B.H.; Laurberg, P.; Ovesen, L.; Perrild, H.; Jørgensen, T. Estimating salt intake in a Caucasian population: Can spot urine substitute 24-hour urine samples? Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Whitton, C.; Gay, G.M.; Lim, R.B.; Tan, L.W.; Lim, W.Y.; van Dam, R.M. Evaluation of Equations for Predicting 24-Hour Urinary Sodium Excretion from Casual Urine Samples in Asian Adults. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1609–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bi, Z.Q.; Liang, X.F.; Xu, A.Q.; Wang, L.H.; Shi, X.M.; Zhao, W.H.; Ma, J.X.; Guo, X.L.; Zhang, X.F.; Zhang, J.Y.; et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control and sodium intake in Shandong Province, China: Baseline results from Shandong—Ministry of Health Action on salt reduction and hypertension (SAMSH), 2011. Prev. Chronic. Disc. 2014, 11, E88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, J.Y.; Yan, L.X.; Tang, J.L.; Ma, J.X.; Guo, X.L.; Zhao, W.H.; Zhang, X.F.; Li, J.H.; Chu, J.; Bi, Z.Q. Estimating daily salt intake based on 24 h urinary sodium excretion in adults aged 18–69 years in Shandong, China. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e005089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Li, K.; Peng, X. Assessing whether a spot urine specimen can predict 24-h urinary sodium excretion accurately: A validation study. J. Hypertens. 2019, 37, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, J.; Yan, Y.; Fan, H.; Zhao, X.; Mi, J. Accuracy validation of 8 equations to estimate 24-hour sodium by spot urine in young adolescents. Am. J. Hypertens. 2019, 32, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Bo, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, L. Validation and assessment of three methods to estimate 24-h urinary sodium excretion from spot urine samples in Chinese adults. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, W.; Yin, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, F.; Yang, D.; Fan, Y.; Rong, J.; Tian, M.; Yu, Y. Validation and assessment of three methods to estimate 24-h urinary sodium excretion from spot urine samples in high-risk elder patients of stroke from the rural areas of Shaanxi province. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhou, L.; Tian, Y.; Fu, J.J.; Jiang, Y.Y.; Bai, Y.M.; Zhang, Z.H.; Hu, X.H.; Lian, H.W.; Guo, M.; Yang, Z.X.; et al. Validation of spot urine in predicting 24-h sodium excretion at the individual level. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 1291–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, J.W.; Du, X.F.; Bai, Y.M.; Fang, L.; Liu, M.; Ji, N.; Zhong, J.M.; Yu, M.; Wu, J. Assessment and validation of spot urine in estimating the 24-h urinary sodium, potassium, and sodium/potassium ratio in Chinese adults. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2020, 34, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Han, W.; Sun, N.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Xi, Y.; Ma, Z. Validation of the Spot Urine in Evaluating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion in Chinese Hypertension Patients. Am. J. Hypertens. 2015, 28, 1368–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Huang, L.; Crino, M.; Wu, J.H.; Woodward, M.; Barzi, F.; Land, M.A.; McLean, R.; Webster, J.; Enkhtungalag, B.; Neal, B. Mean population salt intake estimated from 24-h urine samples and spot urine samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Petersen, K.S.; Wu, J.H.Y.; Webster, J.; Grimes, C.; Woodward, M.; Nowson, C.A.; Neal, B. Estimating mean change in population salt intake using spot urine samples. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1542–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dougher, C.E.; Rifkin, D.E.; Anderson, C.A.; Smits, G.; Persky, M.S.; Block, G.A.; Ix, J.H. Spot urine sodium measurements do not accurately estimate dietary sodium intake in chronic kidney disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tan, M.; He, F.J.; Wang, C.; MacGregor, G.A. Twenty-four-hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e012923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, K.; Cooper, R.; McKeever, J.; McKeever, P.; Byington, R.; Soltero, I.; Stamler, R.; Gosch, F.; Stevens, E.; Stamler, J. Assessment of the association between habitual salt intake and high blood pressure: Methodological problems. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1979, 110, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, C.Y.; Cogswell, M.E.; Loria, C.M.; Chen, T.C.; Pfeiffer, C.M.; Swanson, C.A.; Caldwell, K.L.; Perrine, C.G.; Carriquiry, A.L.; Liu, K.; et al. Urinary excretion of sodium, potassium, and chloride, but not iodine, varies by timing of collection in a 24-hour calibration study. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 12 00798 g001 550
Figure 1. Bland–Altman plots comparing measured vs. estimated 24-hUNa excretion. (a) Kawasaki; (b) Tanaka; (c) INTERSALT1; (d) INTERSALT2; (e) Toft; (f) Whitton. The mid-dashed line was the mean bias. The dash-point line were 95% limits of agreement calculated by mean bias±1.96 standard deviation.
Figure 1. Bland–Altman plots comparing measured vs. estimated 24-hUNa excretion. (a) Kawasaki; (b) Tanaka; (c) INTERSALT1; (d) INTERSALT2; (e) Toft; (f) Whitton. The mid-dashed line was the mean bias. The dash-point line were 95% limits of agreement calculated by mean bias±1.96 standard deviation.
Nutrients 12 00798 g001
Nutrients 12 00798 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative difference distributions of measured and predicted 24-hUNa excretion.
Figure 2. Relative difference distributions of measured and predicted 24-hUNa excretion.
Nutrients 12 00798 g002
Nutrients 12 00798 g003 550
Figure 3. Absolute difference distributions of measured and predicted 24-hUNa excretion.
Figure 3. Absolute difference distributions of measured and predicted 24-hUNa excretion.
Nutrients 12 00798 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the 1671 participants according to gender, mean, and standard deviation.
Table 1. Characteristics of the 1671 participants according to gender, mean, and standard deviation.
All (n = 1671)Male (n = 836)Female (n = 835)p-Value 1
Age (years)43.8 ± 12.442.6 ± 12.644.9 ± 12.10.0001
Weight (kg)68.1 ± 13.673.3 ± 13.862.9 ± 11.2<0.0001
Height (cm)163.3 ± 8.6169.2 ± 6.6157.4 ± 5.8<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)25.5 ± 4.225.6 ± 4.225.4 ± 4.20.4244
Systolic BP (mm Hg)121.8 ± 17.9124.8 ± 15.8118.8 ± 19.3<0.0001
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)77.7 ± 11.779.2 ± 11.276.2 ± 12.1<0.0001
Spot urine
Sodium concentration (mmol/L)135.5 ± 60.8144.8 ± 61.2126.3 ± 58.9<0.0001
Potassium concentration (mmol/L)32.0 ± 22.232.5 ± 21.931.6 ± 22.60.4385
Creatinine concentration (mmol/L)9.2 ± 5.810.8 ± 6.17.7 ± 5.0<0.0001
24-h urine
24-h urine volume (mL)1545.2 ± 599.91559.3 ± 614.31531.1 ± 585.20.3377
sodium excretion (mmol/24-h)176.4 ± 79.1190.3 ± 85.9162.5 ± 69.0<0.0001
potassium excretion (mmol/24-h)47.3 ± 21.847.0 ± 23.247.5 ± 20.40.6196
Creatinine excretion (mmol/24-h)10.5 ± 3.612.1 ± 3.68.9 ± 2.7<0.0001
Body-mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), 1 Differences between male and female were tested by independent samples T-test.
Table
Table 2. Comparison between measured 24-hUNa excretion, predicted using six formulas (n = 1671).
Table 2. Comparison between measured 24-hUNa excretion, predicted using six formulas (n = 1671).
24-hUNa (mmol/24-h)Mean Bias (mmol/24-h, 95% CI)p-Value of Mean BiasPerson’s r 1ICC (95%CI) 2
Estimated176.4 ± 79.1
Kawasaki235.0 ± 70.758.6 (54.7, 62.5)<0.00010.4070.58 (0.53, 0.62)
Tanaka173.8 ± 41.1−2.7 (−6.2, 0.9)0.14210.3780.47 (0.42, 0.52)
INTERSALT1152.0 ± 36.5−24.5 (−28.0, −21.0)<0.00010.4100.48 (0.42,0.52)
INTERSALT2149.7 ± 36.0−26.8 (−30.1, −23.3)<0.00010.4090.47 (0.42,0.52)
Toft182.4 ± 50.25.9 (2.3, 9.6)0.00150.3740.51 (0.46,0.55)
Whitton152.3 ± 44.8−24.2 (−27.7, −20.6)<0.00010.3930.50 (0.45,0.55)
24-h urinary sodium (24-hUNa), Person correlation coefficient (Person’s r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), INTERSALT with potassium formula (INTERSALT1), INTERSALT without potassium formula (INTERSALT2), 1 Person correlation all p < 0.0001, 2 The value of single measures were used (all p < 0.01).
Table
Table 3. Misclassification of the six predicted formulas at individual level, n (%).
Table 3. Misclassification of the six predicted formulas at individual level, n (%).
Conversion of Salt Intake by 24-hUNa ExcretionTotal (n = 1671)
<9 g/day (n = 743)9–11.99 g/day (n = 429)12-14.99 g/day (n = 249)≥15 g/day (n = 250)
Kawasaki613 (82.5)302 (70.4)184 (73.9)101 (40.4)1200 (71.8)
Tanaka393 (52.9)203 (47.3)186 (74.7)227 (90.8)1009 (60.4)
INTERSALT1209 (28.1)269 (62.7)227 (91.2)245 (98.0)941 (56.3)
INTERSALT2196 (26.4)281 (65.5)230 (92.4)245 (98.0)952 (57.0)
Toft365 (49.1)287 (66.9)186 (74.7)180 (72.0)1018 (60.9)
Whitton228 (30.7)263 (61.3)219 (87.9)238 (95.2)948 (56.7)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.; Bai, Y.; Guo, X.; Dong, J.; Xu, A.; Wu, J. Estimating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples in Chinese Adults: Can Spot Urine Substitute 24-Hour Urine Samples? Nutrients 2020, 12, 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030798

AMA Style

Xu J, Zhang J, Liu M, Bai Y, Guo X, Dong J, Xu A, Wu J. Estimating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples in Chinese Adults: Can Spot Urine Substitute 24-Hour Urine Samples? Nutrients. 2020; 12(3):798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Jianwei, Jiyu Zhang, Min Liu, Yamin Bai, Xiaolei Guo, Jing Dong, Aiqiang Xu, and Jing Wu. 2020. "Estimating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples in Chinese Adults: Can Spot Urine Substitute 24-Hour Urine Samples?" Nutrients 12, no. 3: 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030798

APA Style

Xu, J., Zhang, J., Liu, M., Bai, Y., Guo, X., Dong, J., Xu, A., & Wu, J. (2020). Estimating 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples in Chinese Adults: Can Spot Urine Substitute 24-Hour Urine Samples? Nutrients, 12(3), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop