Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Asian Fawn Lily (Erythronium japonicum) Extract on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Depressive-Like Behavior in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
The Donkey Milk in Infant Nutrition
Previous Article in Journal
Translating Evidence-Based Guidelines into Practice—Are We Getting It Right? A Multi-Centre Prospective International Audit of Nutrition Care in Patients with Foregut Tumors (INFORM)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The “Fortilat” Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Auxological Outcome at 18 Months of Age
Article

The “Fortilat” Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 18 Months of Age

1
Department of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
2
Italian Association of Human Milk Banks, Via Libero Temolo 4, 20126 Milan, Italy
3
Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
4
Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(12), 3807; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123807
Received: 22 November 2020 / Revised: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 9 December 2020 / Published: 11 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Donkey Milk and Infant Nutrition)
Adequate nutrition is fundamental to neonatal survival and short-term outcomes, but it also has long-term consequences on quality of life and neurologic development of preterm infants. Donkey milk has been suggested as a valid alternative for children allergic to cows’ milk proteins, due to its biochemical similarity to human milk; we, hence, hypothesized that donkey milk could be a suitable basis for developing an innovative human milk fortifier for feeding preterm infants. The aim of the current study was to extend the findings and to evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of corrected age of the infants enrolled in the clinical trial named “Fortilat”. Infants born ≤1500 g and <32 weeks of gestational age were randomized to receive either a combination of bovine milk-based multicomponent fortifier and protein supplement or a combination of a novel multicomponent fortifier and protein supplement derived from donkey milk. The followed fortification protocol was the same for the two groups and the two diets were designed to be isoproteic and isocaloric. All infants enrolled were included in a developmental assessment program. The neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at 18 ± 6 months of corrected age. Minor and major neurodevelopmental impairment and General Quotient (GQ) at the Griffiths-II Mental Development Scale were considered. The GQ was considered both in continuous and as two classes: lower than and higher than (or equal to) a defined cutoff (GQcl). The difference in GQ and GQcl between the two arms was estimated using Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test or Fischer exact test, respectively, on the assumption of casual loss at follow-up. A further analysis was performed using generalized linear models. There were 103 children (bovine milk-derived fortifier arm = 54, donkey milk-derived fortifier arm = 49) included for the neurodevelopmental follow-up. All observations were included in the interval of 18 ± 6 months of corrected age. No significant difference was observed between the two arms in the incidence of neurologic sequelae and the GQs were similar in the two arms. Our results demonstrated no difference for the donkey milk-derived fortifier compared to standard bovine-derived fortifier regarding long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. View Full-Text
Keywords: human milk; human milk fortifier; donkey milk; adjustable fortification; VLBW infants; preterm infants; neurodevelopment outcome; GQ human milk; human milk fortifier; donkey milk; adjustable fortification; VLBW infants; preterm infants; neurodevelopment outcome; GQ
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Peila, C.; Spada, E.; Deantoni, S.; Iuliano, E.; Moro, G.E.; Giribaldi, M.; Cavallarin, L.; Cresi, F.; Coscia, A. The “Fortilat” Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 18 Months of Age. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3807. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123807

AMA Style

Peila C, Spada E, Deantoni S, Iuliano E, Moro GE, Giribaldi M, Cavallarin L, Cresi F, Coscia A. The “Fortilat” Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 18 Months of Age. Nutrients. 2020; 12(12):3807. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peila, Chiara, Elena Spada, Sonia Deantoni, Ester Iuliano, Guido E. Moro, Marzia Giribaldi, Laura Cavallarin, Francesco Cresi, and Alessandra Coscia. 2020. "The “Fortilat” Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 18 Months of Age" Nutrients 12, no. 12: 3807. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123807

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop