Mapping Building Construction Year from Landsat in Data-Scarce, Cloud-Prone Regions: A Parsimonious Spatial Triage Tool for Physical Vulnerability Screening
Highlights
- A parsimonious framework is developed for building construction year mapping in cloud-prone regions, leveraging annual Landsat NDVI and open footprints via TTM algorithm.
- Validated across two heavily cloud-contaminated metros (Shenzhen, Hanoi), it delivers high accuracy and nearly 1.8-fold improvement over monthly LandTrendr in Shenzhen.
- Coarser but consistent annual composites outperform finer-grained alternatives for built-up change detection under persistent cloud cover.
- This scalable spatial triage tool supports physical vulnerability screening, seismic risk modeling, and resilient planning in resource-constrained, fast-growing regions.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Data
2.1.1. Study Areas
2.1.2. Satellite Data
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Preprocessing: Generation of Robust Annual NDVI Composites
2.2.2. Temporal Template Matching (TTM) for Construction Year Detection
2.2.3. Aggregation and Validation
3. Results
3.1. Quantitative Accuracy Assessment
3.2. Qualitative Validation
3.3. Comparative Analysis with Existing Approaches
3.3.1. Qualitative Comparison with BATSCCD
3.3.2. Quantitative Comparison with Monthly NDVI-Based Approach
4. Discussion
4.1. A Robust Framework for Mapping the Foundational Layer of Physical Vulnerability
4.2. Policy Implications for Resilient Urban Planning
4.3. Methodological Considerations and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Saja, A.A.; Teo, M.; Goonetilleke, A.; Ziyath, A.M. A critical review of social resilience properties and pathways in disaster management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 2021, 12, 790–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ner, N.T.; Okyere, S.A.; Abunyewah, M.; Kita, M. Integrating resilience attributes into local disaster management plans in Metro Manila: Strengths, weaknesses, and gaps. Prog. Disaster Sci. 2022, 16, 100249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, S.Z. 100 Resilient Cities program and the role of the Sendai framework and disaster risk reduction for resilient cities. Prog. Disaster Sci. 2021, 11, 100189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greiving, S.; Schödl, L.; Gaudry, K.-H.; Quintana Miralles, I.K.; Prado Larraín, B.; Fleischhauer, M.; Jácome Guerra, M.M.; Tobar, J. Multi-risk assessment and management—A comparative study of the current state of affairs in Chile and Ecuador. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quesada-Román, A. Disaster risk assessment of informal settlements in the Global South. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petzold, J.; Scheffran, J. Climate change and human security in coastal regions. Camb. Prism. Coast. Futures 2024, 2, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hussainzad, E.A.; Gou, Z. Climate risk and vulnerability assessment in informal settlements of the global south: A critical review. Land 2024, 13, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodman, D.; Hayward, B.; Pelling, M.; Castán Broto, V.; Chow, W.; Chu, E.; Dawson, R.; Khirfan, L.; McPhearson, T.; Prakash, A.; et al. Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Elqudah, S.M.; Vigh, L.G. Coexisting with Disasters: A State-of-the-art Review of Resilience Assessment of Steel Structures under Extreme Hazards. Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 2025, 69, 1187–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyers-Angulo, J.E.; Martinez-Cuevas, S.; Gaspar-Escribano, J.M. Classifying buildings according to seismic vulnerability using Cluster-ANN techniques: Application to the city of Murcia, Spain. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2023, 21, 3581–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Wu, T.; Ma, Q.; Xiao, J.; Huang, X.; Guo, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, D. Extraction of Building Construction Time Using the LandTrendr Model with Monthly Landsat Time Series Data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2024, 17, 18335–18350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiavos, A.; Amrein, P.; Bender, N.; Stojadinovic, B. Compliance-based estimation of seismic collapse risk of an existing reinforced concrete frame building. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2021, 19, 6027–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dilena, M.; Dell’Oste, M.F.; Gubana, A.; Morassi, A.; Polentarutti, F.; Puntel, E. Structural survey of old reinforced concrete elevated water tanks in an earthquake-prone area. Eng. Struct. 2021, 234, 111947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulqader, D.N.; Atrushi, D.S. Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Design Codes and Standards for Building Construction. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2022, 10, 106–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulas, M.G.; Stroffolini, L.; Martinelli, P. Vulnerability and retrofitting of torsionally deformable RC buildings: A case study. Structures 2021, 32, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woldemichael, A.; Maduako, I. Satellite-Based Census of Residential Buildings: Application for Climate Risk Assessment; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Biljecki, F.; Chow, Y.S.; Lee, K. Quality of crowdsourced geospatial building information: A global assessment of OpenStreetMap attributes. Build. Environ. 2023, 237, 110295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Wu, L.; Xie, Z.; Chen, Z. Building extraction in very high resolution remote sensing imagery using deep learning and guided filters. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bittner, K.; Adam, F.; Cui, S.; Körner, M.; Reinartz, P. Building footprint extraction from VHR remote sensing images combined with normalized DSMs using fused fully convolutional networks. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2018, 11, 2615–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frantz, D.; Schug, F.; Okujeni, A.; Navacchi, C.; Wagner, W.; van der Linden, S.; Hostert, P. National-scale mapping of building height using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 252, 112128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhuo, L.; Huang, R.; Liao, C.; Tao, H.; Zang, Y. BATSCCD: A new change detection method for mapping building age in rapidly changing urban areas using Landsat time series data. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2024, 17, 2358859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasquarella, V.J.; Arévalo, P.; Bratley, K.H.; Bullock, E.L.; Gorelick, N.; Yang, Z.; Kennedy, R.E. Demystifying LandTrendr and CCDC temporal segmentation. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 110, 102806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennedy, R.E.; Yang, Z.; Cohen, W.B. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr—Temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2897–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbesselt, J.; Hyndman, R.; Newnham, G.; Culvenor, D. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, H.; Xu, H.; Cheng, X. Identifying where and when urban renewal occurs: A continuous change detection-based framework using two decades’ worth of Landsat data. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2025, 18, 2510573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, M.C.; Stehman, S.V.; Potapov, P.V.; Loveland, T.R.; Townshend, J.R.; DeFries, R.S.; Pittman, K.W.; Arunarwati, B.; Stolle, F.; Steininger, M.K. Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9439–9444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Liang, L.; Yu, B.; Cao, W. Mapping annual urban dynamics (1985–2015) using time series of Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 216, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 144, 152–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Q. Monitoring the spatio-temporal dynamics of shale oil/gas development with Landsat time series: Case studies in the USA. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Goward, S.N.; Masek, J.G.; Irons, J.R.; Herold, M.; Cohen, W.B.; Loveland, T.R.; Woodcock, C.E. Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 955–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potere, D. Horizontal positional accuracy of Google Earth’s high-resolution imagery archive. Sensors 2008, 8, 7973–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.L.; Yuan, J.; Lunga, D.; Laverdiere, M.; Rose, A.; Bhaduri, B. Building extraction at scale using convolutional neural network: Mapping of the united states. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2018, 11, 2600–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirko, W.; Kashubin, S.; Ritter, M.; Annkah, A.; Bouchareb, Y.S.E.; Dauphin, Y.; Keysers, D.; Neumann, M.; Cisse, M.; Quinn, J. Continental-scale building detection from high resolution satellite imagery. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2107.12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chander, G.; Markham, B.L.; Helder, D.L. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Runge, A.; Grosse, G. Mosaicking Landsat and Sentinel-2 Data to Enhance LandTrendr Time Series Analysis in Northern High Latitude Permafrost Regions. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Thau, D.; Moore, R. Building a better urban picture: Combining day and night remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 11887–11913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, D.; Xiang, B. Spatiotemporal dynamics of impervious surface areas across China during the early 21st century. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 1691–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, R.; Faloutsos, C.; Swami, A. Efficient similarity search in sequence databases. In Proceedings of the Foundations of Data Organization and Algorithms: 4th International Conference, FODO’93, Chicago, IL, USA, 13–15 October 1993; Proceedings 4. pp. 69–84. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, C.; Goward, S.N.; Masek, J.G.; Thomas, N.; Zhu, Z.; Vogelmann, J.E. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, J. The principles of majority and proportionality. Br. J. Political Sci. 1971, 1, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Data Set | Data Name | Spatial Resolution | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landsat | Landsat-7/ETM+ | 30 m | 11 January 2000–16 November 2021 | GEE 1 |
| Landsat-8/OLI | 30 m | 15 January 2014–10 December 2021 | GEE | |
| High-resolution data | DigitalGlobe Imagery | 0.6–1.0 m (2000–2010) 0.3–0.5 m (2011–2020) | 2000–2020 | Google Earth |
| Building Footprints | Google Open Buildings (v3) | / | 2021–Present | Google Research |
| Year | Shenzhen (PA %) | Shenzhen (UA %) | Hanoi (PA %) | Hanoi (UA %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 92.59 | 83.33 | 96.15 | 83.33 |
| 2002 | 83.15 | 78.72 | 89.41 | 84.44 |
| 2003 | 82.02 | 81.11 | 92.68 | 84.44 |
| 2004 | 85.23 | 83.33 | 88.64 | 86.67 |
| 2005 | 88.24 | 83.33 | 90.59 | 84.62 |
| 2006 | 90 | 80 | 90.7 | 86.67 |
| 2007 | 89.16 | 82.22 | 90.8 | 87.78 |
| 2008 | 86.05 | 82.22 | 90.24 | 82.22 |
| 2009 | 91.57 | 84.44 | 83.16 | 88.76 |
| 2010 | 94.05 | 87.78 | 91.36 | 80.43 |
| 2011 | 86.05 | 86.05 | 89.77 | 83.16 |
| 2012 | 83.33 | 83.33 | 87.64 | 84.78 |
| 2013 | 87.36 | 84.44 | 88.64 | 87.64 |
| 2014 | 83.33 | 77.78 | 92.77 | 85.56 |
| 2015 | 85.71 | 80 | 90.59 | 85.56 |
| 2016 | 85.54 | 78.89 | 94.05 | 87.78 |
| 2017 | 87.21 | 83.33 | 96.34 | 87.78 |
| 2018 | 82.35 | 77.78 | 90.36 | 83.33 |
| 2019 | 85.88 | 81.11 | 92.77 | 85.56 |
| 2020 | 92.77 | 85.56 | 96.34 | 87.78 |
| City | Overall Accuracy | Mean Absolute Error | Root Mean Squared Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shenzhen | 81.61% | 0.22 years | 0.58 years |
| Hanoi | 85.06% | 0.17 years | 0.51 years |
| Overall Target Number of Small Regions | Number of Successful Predictions in This Model | Hu et al. Model Successfully Predicts Results |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | 39 | 16 |
| PA | 0.83 | 0.34 |
| Overall Target Number | Number of Successful Predictions in This Model | Hu et al. Model Successfully Predicts Results |
|---|---|---|
| 285 | 238 | 133 |
| PA | 0.84 | 0.47 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Mo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q. Mapping Building Construction Year from Landsat in Data-Scarce, Cloud-Prone Regions: A Parsimonious Spatial Triage Tool for Physical Vulnerability Screening. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18132135
Liu Y, Zhang X, Mo Z, Wang Z, Zhang Q. Mapping Building Construction Year from Landsat in Data-Scarce, Cloud-Prone Regions: A Parsimonious Spatial Triage Tool for Physical Vulnerability Screening. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(13):2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18132135
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Yang, Xuan Zhang, Zewen Mo, Zhipang Wang, and Qingling Zhang. 2026. "Mapping Building Construction Year from Landsat in Data-Scarce, Cloud-Prone Regions: A Parsimonious Spatial Triage Tool for Physical Vulnerability Screening" Remote Sensing 18, no. 13: 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18132135
APA StyleLiu, Y., Zhang, X., Mo, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2026). Mapping Building Construction Year from Landsat in Data-Scarce, Cloud-Prone Regions: A Parsimonious Spatial Triage Tool for Physical Vulnerability Screening. Remote Sensing, 18(13), 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18132135

