Quantitative Assessment of Riverbed Planform Adjustments, Channelization, and Associated Land Use/Land Cover Changes: The Ingauna Alluvial-Coastal Plain Case (Liguria, Italy)

The active-channel planform adjustments that have occurred along the Centa, lower Arroscia and lower Neva rivers since 1930, along with the riverbed channelization processes and the land-use and land-cover changes in disconnected riverine areas, were investigated through a multitemporal analysis based on remote sensing and geographical information systems (GIS). These watercourses flow through the largest Ligurian alluvial-coastal plain in a completely anthropogenic landscape. This research is based on the integrated use of consolidated and innovative metrics for riverbed planform analysis. Specific indices were introduced to assess active-channel lateral migration in relation to the active-channel area abandonment and formation processes. The Arroscia and Neva riverbeds experienced narrowing, progressive stabilization, and braiding phenomena disappearance from 1930 to the early 1970s, and then slight narrowing up to the late 1980s. Subsequently, generalized stability was observed. Conversely, the Centa was not affected by relevant planform changes. Recently, all rivers underwent a slight to very slight width increase triggered by the November 2016 high-magnitude flood. The active-channel adjustments outlined in this paper reflect the relevant role in conditioning the river morphology and dynamics played by channelization works built from the 1920s to the early 1970s. They (i) narrowed, straightened, and stabilized the riverbed and (ii) reduced the floodable surface over the valley-floor. Thus, large disconnected riverine areas were occupied by human activities and infrastructures, resulting in a progressive increase in vulnerable elements exposed to hydrogeomorphic hazards. The outlined morphological dynamics (i) display significant differences in terms of chronology, type, and magnitude of active-channel planform adjustments with respect to the medium- and short-term morphological evolution of most Italian rivers and (ii) reflect the widespread urbanization of Ligurian major valley floors that occurred over the 20th century. The outcomes from this study represent an essential knowledge base from a river management perspective; the novel metrics enlarge the spectrum of available GIS tools for active-channel planform analysis.

The medium-and short-term [11] morphological evolution of Ligurian rivers has been scarcely investigated [56]. Recent works focused on the Entella [57][58][59] and Bisagno [60][61][62] rivers, close to Genova, whereas a preliminary overview of the recent morphological evolution of the floodplain-riverbed system in some Ligurian Tyrrhenian catchments was provided by Luino et al. [63]. Previous studies considered the Vara [16,64] and Magra rivers [55,65,66], located at the border between the Liguria and Toscana regions. Liguria is a mountainous region with mostly confined riverbeds along with small, narrow, and elongated alluvial or alluvial-coastal plains generally located in the downstream-most reach of major watercourses. In this setting, the lack of wide flat areas suitable for urban sprawl resulted in the progressive urbanization of major valley floors, which have been intensely modified, particularly since the 19th century [59][60][61]63,[67][68][69][70][71]. Accordingly, during the 20th century, the Ligurian rivers in the major valley floors experienced narrowing, stabilization, and landform simplification, as they were channelized, rectified, and sometimes covered; simultaneously, their adjacent areas were modified to obtain usable land [56,59,61,63,67]. Furthermore, riverbed degradation and shoreline retreat, mainly associated with in-channel sediment quarrying, have been documented [58,72]. Thus, the Ligurian rivers of the major valley floors were incorporated into continuous urban fabric, and their morphological evolution did not follow the aforementioned Italian river general trends. Considering the high proneness to floods of this region due to its physiographical and climatic settings, these landscape changes resulted in serious issues in terms of management of hydrogeomorphic hazards and risks [62,69,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82].
From a river management perspective, multitemporal analysis of river dynamics at the "management scale" [83] (p. 36), which is over the last 100-150 years, is widely known to be a fundamental tool to yield valuable information to understand ongoing dynamics and potential future evolutionary trends [11,[84][85][86][87]. Earth observation based on remote sensing (RS) and geographical information systems (GIS) are essential for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of riverbed planform adjustments as well as land use and land cover (LULC) changes over time [88].
However, the use of RS data (i.e., aerial or satellite images) is strictly limited by the spatial resolution of available imagery with respect to the dimension of elements investigated, the time span covered by image availability, and the prohibitive cost of purchasing each high-spatial resolution scene [97,100,101,106,111,112]. UAV photographs address some of these issues, but their use is generally limited to small areas [102,[113][114][115].
Several studies based on a multitemporal analysis of RS data were performed to investigate LULC changes over time with different purposes [70,105,[116][117][118][119][120][121]. However, these investigations rarely focused in detail on the LULC evolution of both areas of fluvial pertinence and former riverbed zones [27,52,53].
Last, GIS analysis of riverbed planform dynamics over time has usually considered well-established morphometric indices and parameters mainly focusing on channel width, sinuosity, and braiding e.g., [9,13,15,34,41,53,122,123]. Less attention has been given to channel shifting [42,45,98,103,106,107], and very few studies have investigated bank migration in relation to both active-channel dimension change and active-channel horizontal displacement [45,98,107].
In this paper, easily available and often ready-to-use data consisting of historical maps, aerial photographs and Google Earth images were used to outline in detail the active-channel planform adjustments that have occurred along the Centa River and the Arroscia and Neva Rivers floodplain reach (Albenga, NW, Italy) since 1930. Furthermore, the associated bank-stabilization process and LULC changes were investigated. These watercourses flow through the largest Ligurian alluvial-coastal plain in a completely humanmodified landscape and have never been investigated from a geomorphological point of view. Motivated by the need to assess riverbed horizontal migration as a function of channel area formation and abandonment processes, two indices were developed to analyse these planform morphological adjustments. The aims of this study are to (i) provide new insights concerning GIS parameters for active-channel planform analysis based on FOSS GIS, (ii) present a case study of highly channelized riverbed morphological evolution in an anthropogenic landscape, (iii) increase the knowledge about Ligurian and Italian rivers, and (iv) provide useful information for river and land management under a riverrelated risk mitigation and environment restoration perspective.

Study Area
The study area covers the lower part of the Centa River basin, which is located in the western portion of the Liguria region (northwestern Italy) (Figure 1a). The whole catchment belongs geologically to a segment of the Ligurian Alps, and it shows a total area of approximately 435 km 2 . The basin largely develops in the territory of the Liguria region, except for very small northern portions situated close to the main watershed, which encompass the Piemonte region. To the west and north, the basin is bounded by elevations exceeding 1000 m a.s.l., with the highest peaks reached by Mt. Fronté (2151 m) and Mt. Galero (1708 m); to the east and south, the catchment is limited by peaks ranging between approximately 500 and 1000 m a.s.l., while gentle reliefs (i.e., lower than 200 m a.s.l.) occur towards the basin outlet ( Figure 1a). Throughout the upper-middle sector of the basin, sedimentary rocks (e.g., limestones, marls, sandstones, siltstones, dolomites, shales, breccias, and radiolarites) and subordinately metamorphic rocks (e.g., quartzites, schists, and gneiss) crop out [124], while the lower part is characterized by soft rocks (i.e., marly clays and conglomerates) and alluvial deposits [125]. The tectonic uplift that occurred during the Plio-Quaternary strongly influenced the hydrographic network, controlling its orientation and arrangement [126,127]. The catchment is drained by three main watercourses: the Arroscia River, the Neva River, and the Centa River (Figure 1a). The Arroscia River, nearly east-west oriented, has a length of approximately 40 km, and it flows eastwards, receiving two main tributaries from the right side (i.e., the Giara di Rezzo and the Lerrone streams). The Neva River is approximately 19 km long and receives one principal right tributary (i.e., Pennavaire stream) along its almost NW-SE trending path. The Centa River originates from the confluence of the Arroscia and Neva rivers, and after a short stretch of approximately 3.3 km crossing the town of Albenga, it directly flows into the Ligurian Sea (Figure 1a). According to archive information and literature data [128,129], the average daily discharge is approximately 10, 3.7 and 2.6 m 3 /s for the Centa River, the Arroscia River, and the Neva River, respectively. In general, the morphology of the basin is prevalently mountainous-hilly. The upstream parts of the basin show small and deeply incised valleys predominantly covered by woods, meadows, and pastures and secondarily by sparse agricultural lands, prevalently olive groves, and vineyards, along with small settlements. Approximately down-stream of the Ortovero and Cisano sul Neva villages, the valley floors widen progressively, marking the beginning of the alluvial-coastal plain. This plain, locally known as the "Ingauna" plain, consists of recent and Quaternary alluvial deposits, showing different orders of fluvial terraces [127]. In terms of land use, it is currently intensively cultivated and covered by extensive urban areas that become increasingly widespread towards the mouth, where the main town centre of Albenga is located [130]. The climate setting of the basin is of the Mediterranean type, albeit some microclimate differences can be observed along the basin depending on local factors, such as the altitude and the distance from the sea. Both the average annual temperature and mean annual rainfall increase moving from the coastal zone (approximately 15 °C and 760 mm, respectively) to the hinterland (approximately 12 °C and 1170 mm, respectively) [131]. The highest rainfall levels are usually recorded in the autumn period (November is the wettest month) when intense rainfall events can frequently cause severe floods [132]. In the last thirty years, five main floods were documented (i.e., November 1994, October/November 2000, September 2006, October/November 2014, and November 2016) to have caused significant damage to infrastructure, economic activities, and settlements [81,130], especially in the town centre of Albenga [133].
The study presented here focused on the Centa River and the alluvial-coastal plain reaches of the Arroscia and Neva rivers ( Figure 1b). The entire course of the Centa River up to its outlet (3.3 km) was investigated. The selected Arroscia reach (7.7 km) goes from approximately Ortovero village up to confluence with the Neva River, whose reach considered (4.4 km) stretches from downstream of the Cisano sul Neva village to the aforementioned confluence. Along these reaches, riverbed sediments are dominated by cobbles and pebbles and subordinately by finer fractions. The active channel is single-thread or transitional, quite narrow, and heavily channelized. Throughout the 20th century, it experienced widespread anthropic interventions mainly related to the construction of bank protections and levees, urban sprawl, land reclamation for agricultural purposes, and quarrying activities [72,81,134]. The riverine area is generally characterized by tight and discontinuous strips of stable land classifiable as recent terrace, active floodplain, or bench [135], located between channelization structures and the active channel.

Materials and Methods
This research is based on a multitemporal analysis of historical maps, aerial photographs and Google Earth images carried out in a GIS environment using the free and open-source software QGIS [136]. Field surveys were conducted to support and validate the photointerpretation operations related to the active channel, bank protection, and LULC digitizing. Moreover, archival data collection and review were carried out to gain further historical information about the river evolution and to support and validate historical feature mapping. Figure 2 shows a general scheme of the methodological framework.

Data Sources
A set of eleven different data sources spanning the period 1930-2020 was considered to assess the active-channel planform changes over time ( Table 1). The first three data sequences (i.e., 1930, 1954, and 1973) were georeferenced by applying a second-order polynomial transformation, the nearest neighbour as resampling method, and by using the 2010 orthophoto series as a base map for coregistration. Ground control points were located around the riverbed to obtain a better accuracy close to the feature of interest [42,45,137]. The analysis focused on floodplain reaches; thus, an orthorectification procedure was not necessary [14,138,139]. The orthophotos dated back to 1988 to 2016 were retrieved from public geoportals through the web map service function with guaranteed positional accuracy. The Google Earth images were imported by means of the Quick Map Service plug in and visualized at a fixed scale to constantly use the same images whose date was checked directly in Google Earth. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) for 1930 maps, as well as for 1954 and 1973 aerial photographs, were provided by the QGIS Georeferencer. Since each single image with the same date had its own RMSE, the highest value was assigned to all the images of a specific date. Furthermore, the differences in the positions of a series of control points selected on the 2010 orthophotos as a base and on Google Earth images were used to compute the RMSE of these data [11,45].  According to previous investigations [42,140], RMSEs were multiplied by 1.7308 to estimate positional accuracy (Table 1). Hence, the maximum positional error was estimated to be approximately 27 m for the 1930 map, 12 m for the 1954 aerial images, and approximately between 7 and 3 m for the other data, in compliance with previous similar studies [9,11,15,137,141].

Active Channel Mapping
The active channel was manually mapped as a polygon on each dataset (Table 1), including wetted channels and bare or partially vegetated bars (Figure 3a,b) [9,11,14,135,[142][143][144]. This spatial unit reflects ongoing geomorphic processes independent of flow conditions at the time of the survey [45,138]. To maintain accuracy, digitizing was performed at a constant scale of 1:2500, and a single operator performed the whole process [103]. The active channel in 2016 was mapped first, as it refers to the most recent orthophoto available; then digitizing consisted of modifying polygons close in time. This approach was possible thanks to the high spatial accuracy and detailed overlay of images and allowed us to avoid introducing errors in riverbed migration assessment resulting from imprecision in active-channel identification. The active-channel centerline, namely, the line of points equidistant from the banks, was automatically generated by means of polygon skeletonization and line smoothing GIS tools [14,45,138].
The selected segments of the Centa, Arroscia and Neva rivers were divided into homogeneous reaches in terms of geomorphological features, thus considering channel patterns, channel width variations, confinement discontinuities, tributary confluences, and in-channel structures [145,146]. The 2020 banks were extracted and distinguished as "confined" or "not-confined" by natural factors such as slopes, landslide deposits, alluvial fans and ancient river terraces to define the reach-scale confinement degree [52,146].

Bank Protection Assessment
To assess the extent of channelization structures over time, bank protections located along banks and close to them (i.e., no more distant than approximately 50 m) were digitized on images from 1954 onwards, following the procedure implemented for active-chan-nel mapping. Thus, in this study, all defence structures for the prevention of active-channel lateral erosion located in the riverine corridor were considered and referred to as bank protections.
Gabionades, ripraps, and walls were classified as longitudinal bank protections, whereas groynes were classified as cross bank protections. Both were quantified at reach scale: the former as percentage length referred to double the active channel length, and the latter as number of structures per kilometre. The extent of longitudinal bank protection was referred to as very low (≤5%), low (>5% and ≤33%), moderate (>33% and ≤50%), high (>50% and ≤80%), and very high (>80%), according to indicator A6 of the Morphological Quality Index [146][147][148].
Considering the bank protection setting over the last two decades, the macrochannel was mapped (Figure 3a,b). This element was defined as the sum of the active channel and the surface located between banks and channelization works, which is generally a recent terrace, modern floodplain, or bench [135]. It is delimited by longitudinal bank protections or the straight line joining the outermost extremities of adjacent groynes ( Figure 3b). Thus, the macrochannel was identifiable in reaches characterized by continuous or almost continuous longitudinal bank protections or numerous groynes.

Active Channel Planform Changes Analysis
At the reach scale, a number of traditional parameters were computed: (i) active channel length (CL); (ii) active channel area (CA); (iii) active channel width (CW), which is defined as the ratio between the CA and CL [42,144,149]; (iv) braiding index (BI) [150,151]; and (i) sinuosity index (SI), defined as the ratio between CL and the length of the straight line merging the active channel centerline endpoints [44,152]. Furthermore, the active channel width changes were measured with respect to the 1930 and 1954 active channel widths using the channel width variation index (ΔW) [15,53] to compare different reaches. This parameter is defined as follows: where CWref is the CW at the reference time; namely, in 1930 and 1954 in this case. Active-channel planform migration was assessed through specific indices focusing on the analysis of the active-channel location ( Figure 4). The superimposition of two active-channel polygons referred to different times, hereafter called time 1 (t1) and time 2 (t2), allowed for the identification of stable active-channel areas (SACAs; Figure 4a,b). These planform elements were investigated at the reach scale by introducing the active channel abandonment index (CAI), which indicates the amount of abandoned active channel area referred to the oldest active-channel, and the active channel formation index (CFI), which reveals the extent of acquired active channel area referred to the most recent active-channel. These parameters were computed using the following equations: and where CAt1 and CAt2 are the active channel areas at t1 and t2, respectively, while SACA is the area of the stable active channel within the considered period. The CAI and CFI range between 0 and −100% and between 0 and 100%, respectively. The former (latter) is expressed through negative (positive) values to highlight that it denotes a surface loss (acquisition). CFI is an indicator of channel stability, namely, the lowest its value, the widest the active channel at t2 corresponding to the active channel at t1. To facilitate the assessment of computed values, ΔW, CAI in terms of absolute values, and CFI were referred to as very low (≤15%), low (>15% and ≤35%), moderate (>35% and ≤50%), high (>50% and ≤75%), and very high (>75%), considering intervals from the indicator CA2 of the Morphological Quality Index (146)(147)(148) and previous studies [15,153]. CAI and CFI classes were put into relation by means of a matrix, by which four different classes of active-channel planform migration were established: I: intense; M: moderate; S: slight; N: no/very slight (Table 2). Therefore, based on the quantitative assessment of both active channel area formation and abandonment processes, this classification scheme allowed the riverbed horizontal migration magnitude to be qualitatively outlined and possibly associated with a prevalent planform process (i.e., riverbed formation or abandonment). Finally, the abandoned active channel areas (AACAs) and the newly formed active channel areas (NACAs) were identified by superimposing two active channel polygons at t1 and t2 (Figure 4a,b). This was done by considering all available periods and the entire intervals 1930-2020 and 1954-2020. AACAs and NACAs included within the macrochannel were quantitatively assessed through a superimposition procedure to investigate their location with respect to it. VL I ** M ** S ** N N * (**) The active-channel migration process is mainly associated with the formation (abandonment) of active-channel area and does not correspond to an overall active-channel displacement.

LULC Change Analysis
The 2020 active channel was superimposed on each of the 1930, 1954, and 1973 active channels, and the abandoned areas, namely, the surfaces converted from riverbed to floodplain, were extracted. The current LULC of these surfaces was mapped through visual interpretation, following the approach adopted for active-channel mapping. The Google Earth image dated back to 2020 was used as a base. Eight LULC classes were considered: (i) urban area (U); (ii) industrial area (I); (iii) transport area (T), including roads, rail networks, and airports; (iv) quarry area (Q), including construction sites, active and abandoned quarries; (v) abandoned man-made area (M), representing periurban areas, abandoned agricultural areas, degraded areas, and partly worked surfaces; (vi) agricultural area (A), including every type of agricultural surface both outdoors and under greenhouses; (vii) natural and seminatural area (N); and (viii) sea (S). Thus, the extent of each LULC class referring to the overall abandoned area in each year considered and the extent of each LULC class included within the macrochannel were computed. The LULC classes were defined according to the local setting, and with the specific aim of assessing the anthropogenic use of riverine areas, the periods for comparison were chosen to investigate the LULC changes associated with the active-channel major planform adjustments.

Active Channel Planform Adjustments
An overall CW reduction was documented from 1930 to 2020, except for reach C2 (Figure 5a). The highest CW variation occurred in reaches A2 and A3, where the CW ranges were 170 and 241 m, respectively. Lower ranges were observed along the other reaches: 99 m in N2, 81 m in C1, 70 m in A1, 36 m in C2, and 35 m in N1. Five of seven reaches showed the highest CW in 1930, and six of seven reaches showed the highest CW in 1930 or 1954. All reaches of the Arroscia experienced narrowing up to 1988. Subsequently, a discontinuous and very slight widening occurred in A2 and A3, while in A1, CW substantially did not change up to 2016. Similarly, N2 showed a CW reduction up to 1988, and no changes were documented up to 2016. In C1, the main narrowing occurred between 1930 and 1973, whereas after that, low fluctuations were observed. Fairly different trends were noticed in reaches N1 and C2. The former experienced very slight changes in CW consisting of widening from 1930 to 1954 and of narrowing up to 1973; then, CW remained overall stable. The latter did not experience changes in CW up to 1997 and then showed a stepped tendency towards widening. Channel widening was observed in all reaches from 2016 to 2018 and thereafter continued in A3 and C1 up to 2020, whereas CW remained constant in other reaches.
Similar ΔWs in terms of both values and temporal trends characterize the Arroscia reaches (Figure 5b,c). In contrast, differences in trends and values exist between N1 and N2 and between C1 and C2. For reaches A1, A2, and A3, the comparison between ΔWs  , 1930 and 1954), the former mainly assumed high values, whereas the latter low values. In reach N1, 1930-and 1954-referred ΔWs were mainly low and moderate, respectively, because widening occurred between 1930 and 1954. Such changes were not observed in reaches N2, C1, and C2, as no relevant active channel width variations occurred before 1954.
In general, high and moderate ΔWs were noticed after 1954 in reaches N2 and C1, respectively, and very low values were observed overall in reach C2 up to 1997. Positive and generally low ΔWs were documented in reach C2 after 1997. In 2020, every reach showed a negative value of ΔW with reference to both 1930 and 1954 active channel widths, except for reach C2, which showed low (29.2%) and moderate (36.9%) increases in channel width, respectively. These negative ΔWs referred to 1930 ranged between −62.3% (reach A3) and −29.7% (reach C1), indicating high active channel width variations in three of seven reaches, moderate variations in one of seven reaches, and low variations in two of seven reaches. With respect to 1954, they range between −57.2% (N2) and −12% (A1), denoting high CW variations in one of seven reaches, moderate variations in two of seven reaches, low variations in three of seven reaches, and very low variations in one of seven reaches.  The 2020 CL was longer than the 1930 CL in reaches A1, A2, and N2 by no more than 3.2%. In contrast, CL reductions ranging between 1.6 and 4.3%, referred to the same period, were observed in reaches A3, N2, C1, and C2.
The main direction of reaches did not change over the considered period, and the outlined CL variations were extremely low and did not result in significant SI changes (Figure 6b). Indeed, SI remained constant and equal or very close to one in essentially all reaches during the examined period. Interestingly, large differences among reaches were documented in terms of BI temporal trends (Figure 6c). This parameter significantly decreased in all Arroscia reaches up to 1973; thereafter, low fluctuations were documented in A1 and A2, while in A3, it remained constant and recently displayed a slight increase. Thus, comparing 1930 and 2020, BI reductions of 0.38 in A1, 0.96 in A2, and 0.49 in A3 were observed. Very low BIs, equal or very close to one, were measured along the Neva and the Centa.
Considering SI and BI, the channel pattern in each investigated year was outlined ( Figure 6d). The main changes occurred along the Arroscia before 1973. In particular, in reaches A2 and A3 at the turn of the mid-20th century, a general change between noncontiguous channel patterns occurred: in the period 1930-1954, the braided active channel became wandering, whereas between 1954 and 1973, it changed from wandering into sinuous with alternate bars. The other variations were between contiguous patterns. A1 changed from wandering to sinuous with alternate bars in the period 1930-1954; N2 was always sinuous with alternate bars except in 1954, when it was wandering; N2 changed from sinuous with alternate bars to straight between 1973 and 1988. In summary, these outcomes revealed that intense channel-pattern variations affected the Arroscia before 1973, limited changes were observed along the Neva before 1988, and no changes occurred along the Centa.
Between 1930 and 1954 the Arroscia reaches showed high and moderate CAIs, as, on average, −48.8% of the active channel was abandoned (Figure 7). Lower values, on average of −15.7% and −29.0%, were noticed in the Neva and Centa reaches, respectively. Referring to the same period, the newly formed area of the 1954 active channel was low in reaches A1, N1, N2, and C2 and very low in A2, A3, and C1. In the period 1954-1973, CAI was high in A2 and moderate in all Neva reaches, A3, and C1. Low and very low values were observed in A1 and C2, respectively. CFI was never higher than 12.3% (very low), except for A2, in which 27.1% (low) was registered (Figure 7). From 1973 to 1988, low CAIs, ranging between −17.5% and −34.9%, were documented in all Arroscia reaches and in N2, very low in the others; CFI was generally very low, usually with values < 10%, except for a low value (24.5%) observed in C1.
Excluding reach C1, which presented a low CAI in the period 1988-1997, all other reaches experienced very low (rarely >10%) active-channel abandonment from 1988 onwards. A similar result was documented for CFI even if some low values more were noticed. These values of CAI and CFI indicated the substantial lack of relevant active-channel adjustments, in terms of both changes in channel area and horizontal displacements, over the last decades. In the 2016-2018 and 2018-2020 periods, a clear and generalized prevalence of very low/low active-channel area acquisition (CFI between 1 and 17%), associated with the lack of migration (i.e., no abandonment, CAI overall <1%), was noticed.
By examining the long-term active-channel comparison, in the period 1930-2020, high CAIs (−56.9% in A1, −59.1% in A2, and −65.1% in A3) and very low/low CFIs (16.5% in A1, 6.1% in A2, and 6.1% in A3) were documented along the Arroscia. Similar trends were observed along the Neva, with moderate (−41.1% in N1) and high (−64% in N2) CAIs and very low CFIs (12% N1 and 9% N2). Moderate (−35.4% in C1) and low (−15.5% in C2) CAIs and very low (6.1% in C1) and low (31.7% in C2) CFIs characterized the Centa. In the span 1954-2020, the Arroscia reaches showed lower CAIs with respect to the previous period (25% in A1, 50.2% in A2, and 35.5% in A3) and very low (13.9% in A1, 9.2% in A3) and low (31.8% in A2) CFIs. The Neva reaches presented moderate (44.5% in N1) and high (58.9% in N2) CAIs and very low (2.3% in N1 e 0% in N2) CFIs, similar to the 1930-2020 period. The Centa reaches were characterized by low (32.4% in C1) and very low (4.5% in C2) CAIs and low (32.7% in C2) and very low (10.7% in C1) CFIs. Referring to the period 1930-2020, the CAI was high in four of seven reaches, moderate in two of seven reaches, and low in one of seven reaches. In 1954-2020, this parameter was high in two of seven reaches, moderate in two of seven, low in two of seven and very low in one of seven. The CFI was low in two of seven reaches and very low in five of seven reaches in both the aforementioned periods. In general, CFI was always low and very low, never >27.1% in each of subsequent periods nor >32.7% in periods 1930-2020 and 1954-2020 (Figure 7). In terms of absolute values, the highest CAIs were 56.2% referring to the former periods and 65.1% referring to the latter.
The reach-scale active-channel planform migration based on the combination of CAI and CFI is shown in Table 4. All classes different from no/very slight migration, namely, moderate and slight, were registered up to 1973 and reflected the occurrence of migration processes associated with the abandonment of active-channel area. In the period 1930-2020, four of seven reaches showed moderate planform migration, two of seven showed slight planform migration, and one of seven showed no/very slight planform migration. Considering the period 1954-2020, these values changed into two of seven reaches experiencing moderate planform migration, two of seven reaches experiencing slight planform migration, and three of seven reaches experiencing no/very slight planform migration. Table 4. Reach-scale active-channel planform migration based on the combination of CAI and CFI. M: moderate; S: slight; N: no/very slight ( Table 2). Referring to reaches A2, A3, N2, C1, and C2, most of the active-channel horizontal displacements occurred within the macrochannel (Figure 8). From 1930 to 1973 and 1988, N2 and the Arroscia reaches, respectively, showed the greatest variability in AACA and NACA, suggesting that large active channel portions were abandoned out of the macrochannel and that most of the newly formed surfaces were within it. Null AACA values correspond to no AACA both within the macrochannel and outside it, except for N2 in 1930-1954 in which 20.7% of the active channel was abandoned (Figure 7), but only 0.1% of the AACA was within it. Planform dynamics remained totally enclosed within the macrochannel from 1988 onwards, except for A3.
With reference to the overall long-term periods 1930-2020 and 1954-2020, it is evident that the Centa planform adjustments occurred almost completely within the macrochannel and that NACA is totally included within it in almost all reaches. The only exception is represented by N2 in the period 1954-2020, in which no NACA both within and out of the macrochannel was observed.

Channelization Works
The longitudinal bank protection extent ranged between 8% and 29% in reach A1, 10% and 81% in reach A2, and 74% and 99% in reach A3 (Figure 9a). From 1954 to 1988, an increase was evident along the Arroscia, especially in reach A2, where a marked variation from 10% to 78% occurred. After 1988, overall stability was documented, except for the period 1999-2007, when a slight increment affected all reaches of the Arroscia. Moreover, in A1 and A3, a very low reduction in longitudinal defences was noticed from 2016 to 2018 and from 2016 to 2020, respectively. In reach N1, a relevant increase (i.e., from 67% to 88%) was documented only between 1973 and 1997. Similarly, reach N2 experienced an increase from 67% to 100% in the period 1954-1973, after which there were no changes. The Centa banks were completely covered by protections in 1954, and nothing had yet changed. Currently, five of seven reaches are affected by very high (>87%, in three reaches =100%) percentages of longitudinal bank protections, while they are high (80%) and low (24%) in reaches A2 and A1, respectively.
The highest values of groyne density were noticed in reaches A2, A3, N2, and C1 (Figure 9b). In all Arroscia reaches, an increment was observed from 1954 to 1973. In this period, the number of groynes per km changed from 0 to 11.1 and from 0.3 to 6.1 km −1 in reaches A2 and A3, respectively. Fluctuations were observed after 1973 in reaches A2 and A3, where a slight decreasing trend was observable after 2000. Conversely, no changes were documented in A1. No groynes affected reach N1, except in 1973. In reach N2, the groyne density changed from 0 to 7.4 km −1 , between 1954 and 1988 and then it remained rather constant. C1 is the only reach already affected by a certain number of groynes in 1954 (4.5 km −1 ). Subsequently, an increment occurred up to 1988, while a decrease (i.e., from 8.6 to 7 km −1 ) was registered between 1988 and 2010. After 2010 no changes were observed. C2 was never affected by groynes between 1954 and 2020. In 2020, the highest groyne density was observed in reaches A2 (11.9 km −1 ), N2 (7.8 km −1 ), C1 (6.9 km −1 ), and A3 (5.6 km −1 ), whereas the lowest values were documented in reaches A1 (1.9 km −1 ), N1 (0 km −1 ), and C2 (0 km −1 ).

LULC Changes
The assessment of LULC variation in the 1930 active-channel abandoned areas highlighted relevant differences at the reach scale (Figure 10a). By grouping M, Q, T, I, and U LULC classes in a single category, the entire artificial area can be considered. This was quite low in reaches A1 (7.6%), C1 (4.9%), and C2 (10.2%), while in the other reaches, it ranged between 44.3% (N2) and 64.6% (A3), with an average value of 53.6%. The activechannel abandoned areas turned into agricultural areas, especially in reaches A1 (44.2%) and N2 (37.1%). In contrast, this change was not documented along the Centa reaches. Natural and seminatural areas were prevalent in reaches C1 (95.1%) and C2 (77.3%).
In the 1973-2020 period (Figure 10c) much more homogeneous data were documented, as the abandoned active channel prevalently changed into natural and seminatural areas. The N class was >80% in six of seven reaches and >88% in five of seven reaches. The overall artificial area was zero or close to zero in all reaches except for A2 (18.3%) and A3 (46.8%). The agricultural area was registered only in A1 (11.4%) and N1 (10.6%). The comparison of the average values of LULC classes identified in each reach and referring to every selected period highlighted a progressive reduction in LULC classes. In fact, they decreased from 4.9 for the 1930-2020 period, to 2.7 for the 1973-2020 period.  Figure 10c) active channels. In all considered periods, the N class presented the highest values, generally never <72.6%. In particular, it was never <97.9% in N2, and it ranged between 97.9% and 100.0% in the Centa reaches. These results indicated that most of the N class was included within the macrochannel. In general, the other classes presented very low or null values, namely, they were not included within the macrochannel. Some exceptions were represented by the T class in C2 (22.1%) in the 1930-2020 period, the class A in A2 (43.2%) and U in C1 (100%) in the 1954-2020 period, and the class M in A2 (9.2%) in the 1973-2020 period. The S class areas, when existing, were necessarily located totally within the macrochannel. Table 5. Area (%) of each LULC class of the abandoned areas of 1930, 1954, and 1973 active channels ( Figure 10) that is included within the macrochannel. Reaches A1 and N1 were not considered as they do not display the macrochannel. Zero indicates that the active-channel abandoned areas showing the LULC class which this value refers to are not included within the macrochannel; the absence of value indicates that no active-channel abandoned areas showing the LULC class which the null value refers to were mapped in the whole reach.

Data and Metrics for the Analysis of Active-Channel Planform Adjustments
In this study, the traditional approach adopted to obtain the input data, namely, the manual digitizing of the active-channel polygon on maps and remote sensing images in a GIS environment, allowed us to investigate a large area with a high level of accuracy and substantially no costs for data acquisition and processes. On the one hand, this consolidated method was the most suitable and effective. On the other hand, it was the only possible approach to quantitatively assess the medium-and short-term active-channel planform adjustments [11] of the Arroscia, Neva, and Centa rivers for the following reasons: (i) the active channel was too narrow to be investigated by means of freely available satellite imagery whose use is conditioned by the low resolution with respect to the considered object; (ii) the assessment of the medium-term morphological changes implied the need to consider a long time series of data; (iii) this research aimed to perform a low-cost analysis based mostly on freely available data retrieved from public geoportals and free and open source GIS software to be largely replicable; and (iv) the high artificialization of both the alluvial-coastal plain and riverbed along with the need for highly accurate data made the operator-driven photograph interpretation essential to map active channels, bank protections and LULC classes.
Along with traditional metrics that provided a snapshot of the active channel at a specific time (i.e., CL, CA, CW, SI, and BI), ΔW was considered to quantify the variations that occurred with respect to a reference condition; this is particularly useful to make changes more tangible, to compare width changes among different reaches and to implement methods developed for river management purposes [147]. These parameters focus on active-channel planform features and do not consider riverbed horizontal displacements over time. Other metrics are available to investigate active channel shifts, such as migration rate [26,42,44,[154][155][156][157][158], migration distance [87,155,156,[159][160][161], and cumulative migration [42,44,138,155,162]. They express the horizontal displacement of a linear element, generally the active-channel centerline [42,138] and rarely the bank [45], in absolute terms, thus providing the extent of the occurred shift as a rate or a distance. However, active-channel planform migration may occur in either stable or changing active-channelwidth conditions. In the former case, the active-channel centerline migration follows banks migration, reflecting effective active-channel displacement (Figure 11a). Conversely, in the latter case, the active-channel centerline migration conveys the influence of active-channel narrowing or widening; therefore, the measured horizontal displacement could derive from width changes of a substantially stationary riverbed rather than represent proper active-channel lateral migration processes (Figure 11b).
The channel activity and the net channel change [144] are indicators of channel stability and they furtherly express the rate of channel migration and the planform prevalent process, respectively. They indicate the sum of and the difference between, respectively, the area of erosion (formation) and deposition (abandonment) of the active channel per year per unit of longitudinal distance [144]. Although they consider the overall areal variation of the active channel, thus combining both active-channel dimension change and migration, they do not explicitly provide the extent of surfaces involved in the aforementioned processes (i.e., active-channel formation and abandonment). Null or close-to-zero values of net channel change, namely, no prevalence of one of the two processes, could correspond to either no AC area formation and abandonment (i.e., no migration) or large areas of the same extent involved in both processes (i.e., migration). Thus, this parameter must be interpreted considering the channel activity jointly. This issue, along with the unit of measurement, overall makes the use and comprehension of channel activity and net channel change quite complex for nonexperts, particularly from a river management perspective. Figure 11. Active-channel planform migration in (a) stable and (b) changing active-channel width conditions, referring to the period t1-t2. Black arrows indicate the active-channel centerline horizontal displacement.
In this light, CAI and CFI are introduced because they provide information about the amount of abandoned and formed active channels in a given period at the reach scale. These metrics do not consider time; hence, the comparison of CAI and CFI values of different reaches is appropriate provided that referred to a specific period. Accordingly, it is not completely suitable to compare data among periods of different durations. However, this does not mean that comparison is not possible but that this limit must be considered to avoid misinterpretation. In contrast, these novel metrics are quite easy to understand in terms of meaning and unit of measurement, and the definition of qualitative classes makes their potential for use even broader.
Finally, the combination of CAI and CFI led to the assessment of active-channel planform migration based on active-channel area formation and abandonment. In particular, the proposed classification scheme allowed us to qualitatively define the degree of migration, as well as the potential prevalent planform process in terms of either active-channel area formation or abandonment, at the reach scale and over a specific time span. The integrated use of CAI and CFI along with active-channel width data enabled us to obtain an overall knowledge frame concerning variations in active-channel dimension and location.
The overall method implemented in this study, including metrics, is not limited to specific geographical areas and can be applied to all channel patterns, except in the case of anabranching channels and, in general, in the case the active channel presents islands, namely, the active-channel polygon presents holes. In these cases, CAI and CFI can be considered, but the migration matrix based on their combination (Table 2) cannot as it does not consider in detail island planform dynamics. Moreover, BI should be accompanied by anabranching index [83,148] and total CA and CW, namely, including islands, can be computed [9]. No need for large founding and specific instruments and the comprehensibility of the results represent evident advantages of the method and parameters applied. Furthermore, the outcomes are essential for river management, as they outline the medium-and short-term river morphological evolution. Its knowledge allows ongoing morphological dynamics to be understood and put in perspective, future trends to be predicted, and thus appropriate management measures to be developed [84][85][86]145]. In contrast, (i) the manual digitizing process is rather time-consuming, (ii) riverbeds that are too narrow and densely-covered do not allow digitizing to be performed, and (iii) remotesensing data availability, in terms of spatiotemporal coverage and adequate resolution, strictly limits the analysis [112,161]. Historical documents and field surveys allow validation of photointerpretation operations and can provide relevant information.

Active-Channel Morphological Evolution
Considering the spatial distribution, magnitude, and chronology of the documented active-channel planform adjustments, both common trends and notable differences in the morphological evolution of the rivers investigated were noticed. Therefore, different evolutionary phases for each water course were identified ( Figure 12).
Phases 1 and 2 of the Neva morphological evolution are overall in compliance with those of Arroscia, except for some differences noticed in subphase features and chronology between 1930 and 1988 (phase 1). From 1930 to 1954 (subphase 1a), no homogeneous trends were documented at the reach scale, apart from the absence of planform migration. N1 experienced slight widening and pattern change from sinuous with alternate bars to wandering, whereas N2 experienced slight narrowing and no change in channel pattern. Between 1954 and 1973 (subphase 1b), the most relevant adjustments were documented. Pattern changes characterized by the disappearance of braiding phenomena and straightening occurred in reaches N1 and N2, respectively, and slight migration associated with narrowing was noticed. The active channel width decreased especially in N2. In the period 1973-1988 (subphase 1c), no active-channel adjustments were documented, except for a further slight narrowing that affected N2.
Conversely, the Centa experienced a much more stable morphological evolution, namely, no large active-channel planform changes were substantially observed from 1930 onwards. Major active-channel planform adjustments most likely occurred before 1930. For C1, after channel planform stability from 1930 to 1954 (subphase 2a), in the period 1954-1999 (subphase 2b) a notable narrowing up to 1973 was observed and slight widening and narrowing, both supposed to be associated with in-channel bulldozer interventions, were noticed from 1973 to 1988 and from 1988 to 1999, respectively. From 1999 to 2016 (subphase 2c), overall morphological stability was documented again. The two small widening stages registered in C2 just before 2000 and between 2007 and 2010 are both related to anthropogenic works for active-channel enlargement and in-channel bulldozer interventions.
A common morphological trend characterized by riverbed widening was displayed by all reaches from 2016 onwards (phase 3).

Figure 12.
Time chart of reach-scale active channel morphological adjustments and related magnitudes. The terms "contiguous" and "noncontiguous" pattern refer to [52,148]. The active-channel planform migration magnitude was defined according to the combined analysis of CAI and CFI (see Table 2).
A long history of channelization and riverbed anthropogenic variations characterizes the Centa River close to Albenga, as this area has been inhabited since the pre-Roman period [163][164][165]. For the period investigated, some structures are well recognizable on the 1930 map in reaches A3 (Figure 13a), N2 (Figure 13b), and C2. Most likely, discontinuous and localized defences already existed along all reaches for a long time.
According to archival documents and the outcomes from this study, the largest, most generalized, and substantially irreversible channelization works were realized in the 1920s and 1930s, in reaches A3, N2, C1, and C2, and between 1954 and 1973 in reaches A1, A2, A3, N1, and N2. These structures generally had the double function of both erosion and flood prevention; therefore, on the one hand, they narrowed, straightened, and stabilized the riverbed, and on the other hand, they reduced the floodable surface over the valley floor (Figure 13c-h). The Centa appeared completely channelized in 1954, when reaches A3 and N2 presented approximately 70% protected banks, and most likely, some defences already existed in reaches A1 and N1. Between 1954 and 1973, several longitudi-nal bank protections were built in reaches A2, A3 and N2, and many groynes were realized in all reaches. In N1, eight bed sills, along a stretch approximately 1350 m long, were executed between 1973 and 1988. Moreover, two bed sills were built in the aforementioned period and between 1988 and 1997 in A3. In this context, the major cause of active-channel low mobility and narrowing was overall identified into the constraints exerted by channelization works for decades [27,[166][167][168][169][170][171]. Furthermore, in reaches A1 and N1, low mobility was associated with the proximity of valley sides and terraces [172].
As a result of channelization, large active-channel surfaces remained behind bank protections and were thus excluded from channel dynamics, especially in reach A3 (period 1930-1954) and in reaches A2, A3, and N2 (period 1954-1973). Accordingly, many riverine areas were anthropogenically reshaped.
From the 1930s to the late 1980s, especially after the 1954, the defence-disconnected active channel was progressively occupied mainly by (i) agricultural areas in A1 ( Figure  13c), (ii) airports, cultivated fields, and urban fabrics in A2, (iii) agricultural areas, road infrastructures, industrial sheds, and quarries in A3 (Figure 14), and (iv) agricultural and industrial areas in N1 and N2 (Figure 13g). Currently, some areas already allocated to human activities are abandoned and degraded. Over the considered period, the long-term defence-induced stability of the Centa River resulted in substantially scarce active-channel abandoned areas outside the macrochannel, which became transport and urban areas.
The urban sprawl of Albenga that occurred during the second half of the 20th century led to the urbanization of most of the floodplain adjacent to reaches C1 and C2.
Urbanization that affected the Arroscia-Neva-Centa alluvial-coastal plain resulted in a progressive increase in vulnerable elements exposed to hydrogeomorphic hazards, particularly in reaches A2, A3, N2, C1, and C2 ( Figure 14). The active-channel planform dynamics characterizing phases 1b of reaches A2 and A3, 1c of N2, and phase 2 of all rivers investigated took place entirely within the macrochannel, where narrow and discontinuous strips of stable land, assimilable to bench, active floodplain, and recent terrace [135], and corresponding to natural and seminatural areas, were cyclically formed and eroded. Thus, although it seemed that large active-channel abandoned areas turned into natural and seminatural areas (Figure 10), these last areas were mostly included within the macrochannel, particularly since the 1970s (Table 5). This outcome highlighted that, at present, there are substantially no natural and seminatural areas outside the macrochannel.
The generalized active-channel slight-to-very-slight widening process that characterized phase 3 was triggered by the November 24th, 2016, high-magnitude flood, which caused damage to bank protections, prevalently groynes, and promoted lateral erosion processes. Bank retreat, mainly associated with undercut bank protection collapses, was widespread in reach A1, in which it involved natural and seminatural areas located on the recent terrace. In N1, minor effects were documented, and the active channel substantially reshaped narrow strips of recently formed or incipient active floodplains and benches. In the other reaches, channel widening occurred completely within the macrochannel, thus involving the aforementioned natural and seminatural areas developed between bank protections. The localized lateral erosion process in A3, resulting from the collapse of erosion-and flood-defence structures that affected former quarries and caused the flooding of a large area, is the only exception ( Figure 14d).
Floods occurred after 2016, especially the 2-3 October 2020 extreme event, exacerbated these processes and highlighted the vulnerability of the floodplain system, where there are substantially no rooms for river dynamics left.
Changes in length in reach C2 revealed that the river-mouth front moved within a 100-m-wide belt defined by the 1930 and 1954 shoreline locations. The marked retrogradation measured from 1930 to 1954 was most likely mainly triggered by in-channel sediment quarrying activity [72,173]. Hereafter, slighter fluctuations towards overall progradation occurred. The advance of the Centa mouth observed in the period 2016-2018 is most likely associated with the occurrence of the November 2016 high-magnitude flood.
The outlined morphological evolutionary phases related to the active-channel planform adjustments correspond to the common medium-and short-term morphological evolution of Italian rivers only partially [9,15,34,53]. This last presents two phases of channel degradation that lasted approximately from the late 19th century to the 1950s and from the 1950s to the 1990s. They were characterized by multi-to single-thread channel pattern variation and slight (the former) and severe (the latter) active-channel narrowing. These phases resulted substantially reversed along the Arroscia and Neva and were not documented along the Centa. Furthermore, an inversion of the channel-degradation tendency consisting of active channel widening was documented along several Italian rivers after the most intense narrowing phase, namely, on average, at the end of the 1990s [9,14,15,34,45]. Conversely, all the Arroscia, Neva, and Centa reaches underwent a period of marked planform stability from the late 1980s to 2016. After 2016, channel widening, triggered and fostered by the occurrence of high-magnitude floods, became the dominant process, as documented in other cases [14,34,41,42,44]. Further investigations will be necessary to define whether the current processes represent either a new long-lasting morphological phase or a temporary condition associated with impulsive events. Moreover, future assessment of bed-level changes over time and analysis of natural and anthropogenic controlling factors will lead to display the complete frame concerning the mediumand short-term morphological evolution of the Arroscia, Neva, and Centa rivers.

Conclusions
This research outlined the active-channel planform adjustments that occurred along the Centa, the lower Arroscia and the lower Neva rivers since 1930 in terms of activechannel dimension, pattern, and migration, along with the spatiotemporal distribution of channelization works and LULC changes of abandoned active-channel areas over time.
The outcomes revealed that Arroscia and Neva experienced the most relevant activechannel planform adjustments consisting of narrowing, progressive stabilization, and braiding-phenomena disappearance from 1930 to the early 1970s and slight narrowing up to the late 1980s. Between the late 1980s and 2016, generalized active-channel stability was noticed. Conversely, the Centa River was not affected by relevant active channel width changes and substantially did not experience either significant channel pattern changes or lateral migration. All reaches experienced a slight-to-very-slight width increase after 2016. This process was (i) mainly associated with the reacquisition of former active channel areas almost completely included within the macrochannel, (ii) triggered by the November 2016 high-magnitude flood, and (iii) fostered by subsequent events. Further assessments will be necessary to define whether the ongoing widening trend represents either a new long-lasting morphological phase or a temporary condition associated with impulsive events.
The active-channel adjustments outlined reflect the relevant role in conditioning the river morphology and dynamics played by channelization works built in the 1920s and 1930s along the Centa and the Arroscia and Neva at their confluence with the Centa and between the early 1950s and the early 1970s along the Arroscia and the Neva. They narrowed, straightened, and stabilized the riverbed and reduced the floodable surface over the valley floor. As a result, large riverine areas disconnected from the active channel were progressively occupied by human activities and infrastructures from the 1930s to the late 1980s, largely after the early 1950s. The urbanization process that affected the Arroscia-Neva-Centa alluvial-coastal plain resulted in a progressive increase in vulnerable elements exposed to hydrogeomorphic hazards.
The outlined morphological dynamics (i) show significant differences in terms of chronology, type, and magnitude of active-channel planform adjustments with respect to the medium-and short-term morphological evolution of most Italian rivers and (ii) reflect the widespread urbanization of Ligurian major valley floors and the associated riverbed channelization that occurred over the 20th century.
Further analyses focusing on historical and recent bed level changes and on catchment-and reach-scale controlling factors would be appropriate to define the complete frame concerning the medium-and short-term morphological evolution of the Arroscia, Neva, and Centa rivers and predict future morphological dynamics according to different scenarios of management.
The synergistic use of consolidated and innovative metrics allowed the active-channel planform adjustments to be quantitatively assessed in detail. The novel CAI and CFI provided readily comprehensible information on the amount of abandoned and formed active channels in a given period at the reach scale. Additionally, their combination allowed the riverbed horizontal migration magnitude to be outlined and associated with the prevalent planform process in terms of either active channel area formation or abandonment. The introduction of these metrics enlarged the spectrum of available GIS tools for active-channel planform analysis. Furthermore, this research highlighted the great relevance of high-resolution freely available aerial and satellite images and free and open source software to perform repeatable, low-cost, and highly accurate hydrogeomorphic investigations based on long-term remote sensing data. Limitations of this research and the procedure proposed, including metrics, are essentially related to data availability, time-consuming manual digitizing phase, and riverbed morphology suitability. Furthermore, the approach that was adopted for active-channel planform change analysis investigates changes between the dates considered but, necessarily, can only assume a linear transition in the channel position and appearance in the intervening period, even if abrupt changes or reversions of trend could have happened one or more times [161].
The outcomes from this study represent an essential knowledge base for the assessment of hydrogeomorphic hazards and risks and for planning effective and sustainable river management measures to recover the fluvial environment and mitigate river-related risks.
Funding: This research received no external funding.