Plant Growth and Water Purification of Porous Vegetation Concrete Formed of Blast Furnace Slag, Natural Jute Fiber and Styrene Butadiene Latex

The purpose of this study is to investigate porous vegetation concrete formed using the industrial by-products blast furnace slag powder and blast furnace slag aggregates. We investigated the void ratio, compressive strength, freeze–thaw resistance, plant growth and water purification properties using concretes containing these by-products, natural jute fiber and latex. The target performance was a compressive strength of ě12 MPa, a void ratio of ě25% and a residual compressive strength of ě80% following 100 freeze–thaw cycles. Using these target performance metrics and test results for plant growth and water purification, an optimal mixing ratio was identified. The study characterized the physical and mechanical properties of the optimal mix, and found that the compressive strength decreased compared with the default mix, but that the void ratio and the freeze–thaw resistance increased. When latex was used, the compressive strength, void ratio and freeze–thaw resistance all improved, satisfying the target performance metrics. Vegetation growth tests showed that plant growth was more active when the blast furnace slag aggregate was used. Furthermore, the use of latex was also found to promote vegetation growth, which is attributed to the latex forming a film coating that suppresses leaching of toxic components from the cement. Water purification tests showed no so significant differences between different mixing ratios; however, a comparison of mixes with and without vegetation indicated improved water purification in terms of the total phosphorus content when vegetation had been allowed to grow.


Introduction
Ecosystem restoration has received growing attention in recent years, and there have been many and diverse investigations of the properties of concretes, including porous vegetation concrete [1][2][3][4].Plant growth is inhibited in concrete because of the limited space for rooting and sprouting, the low water permeability and retentivity, and the low nutrient content [5][6][7][8].Porous vegetation concrete allows water and nutrients to be supplied, enabling plant growth [9][10][11].Also, CO 2 emissions are becoming an increasingly pressing concern because of the threat of global warming [5,12,13].The concrete industry is seeking measures to reduce CO 2 emissions, as CO 2 emissions from cement manufacturing contribute to about 5%-15% of global CO 2 emissions [12][13][14].Therefore, a significant reduction in cement use would be an effective way to reduce CO 2 global emissions [13].The CO 2 emissions associated with the production of 1 ton of cement are approximately 870 kg, and methods to reduce the use of cement in concrete are urgently required [5,13].If cement could be replaced with blast furnace slag cement, it would be particularly effective in reducing global CO 2 emissions [13,14].
Crushed stones are widely used as aggregates in the production of concrete; however, there are a number of environmental problems (destruction of natural rock, rock mountain, and forest resources, etc.) associated with this technique, and other aggregates are being sought [11,15].Blast furnace slag aggregates are a by-product of the steel industry; if they could be used as a substitute for crushed stone, they would be particularly effective for resource-recycling.
There have been a number of investigations of the use of porous vegetation concrete for river revetments, obtaining a vegetation effect as well as a water purifying effect [6][7][8]16,17].Here, blast furnace slag powder was used, with a mixing ratio of up to 60% of the mass of cement.This study investigated the effects on the physical and mechanical properties of porous concrete, as well as the water purification performance.This study also investigated the addition of styrene butadiene (SB) latex and natural jute fiber, as well as the substitution of crushed aggregates with coarse blast furnace slag aggregates.

Materials
The blast furnace slag cement used in this study had a 60% substitution rate of blast furnace slag; its physical properties are listed in Table 1.The blast furnace slag aggregates exhibited a grain size in the range 8-25 mm, as shown in Figure 1, and the physical properties of the blast furnace slag aggregate are listed in Table 2.During steel production, blast furnace slag aggregates is formed at temperatures in excess of 1500 ˝C.Also, Blast furnace slag aggregates does not include harmful heavy metals such as Cr or Pb [18].When industrial waste contaminates either underground water aquifers or surface water, serious environmental problems may result, including soil and water contamination.Therefore, it is important to carry out environmental analyses.Here, this study carried out heavy metal elution tests on the blast furnace slag aggregates according to the standard of waste process test [19], as listed in Table 3.None of the items listed in Table 3 were detected except for oil; the oily component was <0.1%, which satisfies the standard (of ď5%).The oil is contained in the blast furnace aggregate by the machine in the course of crushing the blast-furnace slag.The crushed aggregates had a maximum size of 25 mm, and the physical properties are listed in Table 2. Natural jute fiber is a natural material formed mostly of cellulose.When it is used as a reinforcing agent in cement, unlike artificial fibers it generates little static electricity, reduces fiber aggregation because of its excellent dispersive nature, and increases the adherence of materials because of its roughness.Furthermore, it has been reported that the application of natural jute fibers to the porous vegetation concrete increases the void ratio and the strength [4][5][6], which was attributed to the hydrophilic nature of jute fiber.Also, this was attributed to stronger hydrogen-bonding between the hydrophilic jute fiber and the cement paste, which increased the bonding strength between the cement paste and the blast furnace aggregate.Figure 2 shows the shape of the jute fiber used herein, and Table 4 lists its physical properties.SB latex was also used in this study.SB latex is a milky semitransparent liquid containing surfactant-coated organic polymer particles (Figure 3).The latex particles form a film during cement hydration.A semi-continuous film forms on the surface of the aggregate and thereby fills the voids.As a result, both the bond and tensile strengths increase.The properties of latex are given in Table 5.

Mix Proportions
The default mixing ratio was determined from a literature survey and analysis of previous studies on vegetation concrete blocks.The substitution ratio of blast furnace slag aggregate was 40%.Also, jute fibers were added 0.1% (Vol, %) and the latex was added in a quantity of about 0.02% of the blast slag cement weight.The mixing ratio was determined based on the addition of latex and natural jute fiber, as listed in Table 6.The main purpose of this study is to develop porous vegetation concrete with structural stability, in which plant growth was facilitated.The EL245 environmental declaration for water-permeable concrete products, issued by the Korean Ministry of Environment, lists the following standards for porous vegetation concrete: a compressive strength of ě12 MPa, void ratio of ě25% and residual compressive strength following repeated freeze-thaw cycles of ě80% [20].This study aimed to comply with these standards.Porous vegetation concrete has pores that enable plant growth.The void ratio is a particularly important factor: a low void ratio typically leads to high strength, but does not facilitate plant growth; however, a high void ratio may lead to low strength.Therefore, it is critically important to control the void ratio.Here we investigated how the void ratio of porous vegetation concrete is affected by the addition of blast furnace slag aggregate, natural jute fibers and latex.This study investigated the void ratio using conical specimens that were 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height using the volumetric method provided by the Eco-Concrete Research Commission of the Japan Concrete Industrial Association.The void ratio is given by where W 1 and W 2 are the underwater and oven-dried weights of the specimen after 28 days, respectively, and V is the volume of the specimen.
To characterize the void ratio, the conical specimens were cured for 24 h following production at 23 ˘2 ˝C and 58% relative humidity.The specimens were prepared such that the pores were saturated with water as much as possible (Figure 4a).After water curing for 1 day before the test, the specimens were measured based on their dry weight after measuring the weight of the water (Figure 4b).The void ratio test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportion.

Compressive Strength
The compressive strength was characterized according to ASTM C39/C39M-15a [21].Specimens of 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height were cured for 24 h at 23 ± 2 °C and 58% relative humidity.The samples were removed from the mold and cured in water for 28 days at 23 ± 2 °C.The compressive strength test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportion.

Compressive Strength
The compressive strength was characterized according to ASTM C39/C39M-15a [21].Specimens of 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height were cured for 24 h at 23 ˘2 ˝C and 58% relative humidity.The samples were removed from the mold and cured in water for 28 days at 23 ˘2 ˝C.The compressive strength test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportion.Figure 5 shows the compressive strength test.

Compressive Strength
The compressive strength was characterized according to ASTM C39/C39M-15a [21].Specimens of 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height were cured for 24 h at 23 ± 2 °C and 58% relative humidity.The samples were removed from the mold and cured in water for 28 days at 23 ± 2 °C.The compressive strength test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportion.Figure 5 shows the compressive strength test.

Freeze-Thaw Cycles
Repeated freezing and thawing tests were carried out according to the ASTM C666/C666M-15 standard [22].The freeze-thaw experiment was conducted by cooling the sample from 4 °C to −18 °C (4 h) then raising the temperature to 4 °C (4 h), for 100 cycles.A compressive strength test was then conducted to measure the residual compressive strength.The compressive strength test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportions.

Freeze-Thaw Cycles
Repeated freezing and thawing tests were carried out according to the ASTM C666/C666M-15 standard [22].The freeze-thaw experiment was conducted by cooling the sample from 4 ˝C to ´18 ˝C (4 h) then raising the temperature to 4 ˝C (4 h), for 100 cycles.A compressive strength test was then conducted to measure the residual compressive strength.The compressive strength test was performed on the six specimens from each mix proportions.

Plant Growth
With porous vegetation concrete, it is important that seeds can sprout and that plants adhere to the concrete.To analyze the vegetation capacity of the concrete, comparative tests were carried out using 200 mm (width) ˆ200 mm (length) ˆ100 mm (height) cubic specimens [6,9,23], as shown in Figure 6.To analyze of vegetation capacity, sprouting and the length of perennial ryegrass shoots (which thrive in cold and wet environments) were monitored.Then, 20 g of ryegrass seeds were sowed on each block while it was submerged underwater, as shown in Figure 7.
With porous vegetation concrete, it is important that seeds can sprout and that plants adhere to the concrete.To analyze the vegetation capacity of the concrete, comparative tests were carried out using 200 mm (width) × 200 mm (length) × 100 mm (height) cubic specimens [6,9,23], as shown in Figure 6.To analyze of vegetation capacity, sprouting and the length of perennial ryegrass shoots (which thrive in cold and wet environments) were monitored.Then, 20 g of ryegrass seeds were sowed on each block while it was submerged underwater, as shown in Figure 7.

Water Purification
The 200 mm × 200 mm × 100 mm specimens that had been used for the vegetation analyses were subsequently used in the water purification analysis.This study analyzed the water quality before and after vegetation using a standard water pollution process test [24].An acrylic port was formed, and the residence time was 10 min.Water with known concentrations of dissolved ammonia-nitrogen, phosphorate-phosphorus, total nitrogen and total phosphorus was produced With porous vegetation concrete, it is important that seeds can sprout and that plants adhere to the concrete.To analyze the vegetation capacity of the concrete, comparative tests were carried out using 200 mm (width) × 200 mm (length) × 100 mm (height) cubic specimens [6,9,23], as shown in Figure 6.To analyze of vegetation capacity, sprouting and the length of perennial ryegrass shoots (which thrive in cold and wet environments) were monitored.Then, 20 g of ryegrass seeds were sowed on each block while it was submerged underwater, as shown in Figure 7.

Water Purification
The 200 mm × 200 mm × 100 mm specimens that had been used for the vegetation analyses were subsequently used in the water purification analysis.This study analyzed the water quality before and after vegetation using a standard water pollution process test [24].An acrylic port was formed, and the residence time was 10 min.Water with known concentrations of dissolved ammonia-nitrogen, phosphorate-phosphorus, total nitrogen and total phosphorus was produced

Water Purification
The 200 mm ˆ200 mm ˆ100 mm specimens that had been used for the vegetation analyses were subsequently used in the water purification analysis.This study analyzed the water quality before and after vegetation using a standard water pollution process test [24].An acrylic port was formed, and the residence time was 10 min.Water with known concentrations of dissolved ammonia-nitrogen, phosphorate-phosphorus, total nitrogen and total phosphorus was produced using reagents in the same manner as with the blast furnace slag aggregate water purification test.Figure 8 shows a photograph before vegetation, and Figure 9 shows a photograph after vegetation.
using reagents in the same manner as with the blast furnace slag aggregate water purification test.Figure 8 shows a photograph before vegetation, and Figure 9 shows a photograph after vegetation.

Void Ratio
Figure 10 shows the void ratio for the four different mixes; i.e., the default mix, as well as porous vegetation concrete with added blast furnace slag aggregate, with natural jute fibers and with latex.The inclusion of blast furnace slag aggregate resulted in a larger void ratio than with crushed aggregate.The larger void ratio is attributed to the blast furnace slag aggregates being more porous than crushed aggregates.The mix with natural jute fiber exhibited the largest void ratio.The specimen with added latex also exhibited an increased void ratio.The target void ratio of using reagents in the same manner as with the blast furnace slag aggregate water purification test.
Figure 8 shows a photograph before vegetation, and Figure 9 shows a photograph after vegetation.

Void Ratio
Figure 10 shows the void ratio for the four different mixes; i.e., the default mix, as well as porous vegetation concrete with added blast furnace slag aggregate, with natural jute fibers and with latex.The inclusion of blast furnace slag aggregate resulted in a larger void ratio than with crushed aggregate.The larger void ratio is attributed to the blast furnace slag aggregates being more porous than crushed aggregates.The mix with natural jute fiber exhibited the largest void ratio.The specimen with added latex also exhibited an increased void ratio.The target void ratio of

Void Ratio
Figure 10 shows the void ratio for the four different mixes; i.e., the default mix, as well as porous vegetation concrete with added blast furnace slag aggregate, with natural jute fibers and with latex.The inclusion of blast furnace slag aggregate resulted in a larger void ratio than with crushed aggregate.The larger void ratio is attributed to the blast furnace slag aggregates being more porous than crushed aggregates.The mix with natural jute fiber exhibited the largest void ratio.The specimen with added latex also exhibited an increased void ratio.The target void ratio of ě25% was satisfied by all mixtures except plain.Therefore, this study concludes that it is necessary to add natural jute fiber or latex or blast furnace slag aggregates to satisfy the target void ratio.≥25% was satisfied by all mixtures except plain.Therefore, this study concludes that it is necessary to add natural jute fiber or latex or blast furnace slag aggregates to satisfy the target void ratio.

Compressive Strength
Figure 11 shows the results of the compressive strength tests.The compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete increased when blast furnace slag aggregate was used.This is attributed to the similar pozolanic reaction of the blast furnace slag aggregate.In previous research, blast furnace slag aggregate have been shown to have the tendancy to increase strength of concrete [25].The addition of natural jute fiber resulted in a decrease in the compressive strength.Generally, the addition of jute fiber improves the tensile and flexural strengths of porous vegetation concrete, rather than the compressive strength.This is because the fiber enhances the bond strength between materials when concrete is subjected to flexural or tensile loading [26,27].Also, this is attributed to the low slump of the relatively dry mixture, as the porous concrete may have insufficient fluidity so that the fibers partake in balling [11].Therefore, the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete is decreased [11].The addition of latex increased the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete, which is attributed to an increase in the early fluidity, promoting the coating of the binder around the aggregates and hence the adherence of the aggregates.The target compressive strength of ≥12 MPa was satisfied by all mixtures except those containing natural jute fibers.

Compressive Strength
Figure 11 shows the results of the compressive strength tests.The compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete increased when blast furnace slag aggregate was used.This is attributed to the similar pozolanic reaction of the blast furnace slag aggregate.In previous research, blast furnace slag aggregate have been shown to have the tendancy to increase strength of concrete [25].The addition of natural jute fiber resulted in a decrease in the compressive strength.Generally, the addition of jute fiber improves the tensile and flexural strengths of porous vegetation concrete, rather than the compressive strength.This is because the fiber enhances the bond strength between materials when concrete is subjected to flexural or tensile loading [26,27].Also, this is attributed to the low slump of the relatively dry mixture, as the porous concrete may have insufficient fluidity so that the fibers partake in balling [11].Therefore, the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete is decreased [11].The addition of latex increased the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete, which is attributed to an increase in the early fluidity, promoting the coating of the binder around the aggregates and hence the adherence of the aggregates.The target compressive strength of ě12 MPa was satisfied by all mixtures except those containing natural jute fibers.≥25% was satisfied by all mixtures except plain.Therefore, this study concludes that it is necessary to add natural jute fiber or latex or blast furnace slag aggregates to satisfy the target void ratio.

Compressive Strength
Figure 11 shows the results of the compressive strength tests.The compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete increased when blast furnace slag aggregate was used.This is attributed to the similar pozolanic reaction of the blast furnace slag aggregate.In previous research, blast furnace slag aggregate have been shown to have the tendancy to increase strength of concrete [25].The addition of natural jute fiber resulted in a decrease in the compressive strength.Generally, the addition of jute fiber improves the tensile and flexural strengths of porous vegetation concrete, rather than the compressive strength.This is because the fiber enhances the bond strength between materials when concrete is subjected to flexural or tensile loading [26,27].Also, this is attributed to the low slump of the relatively dry mixture, as the porous concrete may have insufficient fluidity so that the fibers partake in balling [11].Therefore, the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete is decreased [11].The addition of latex increased the compressive strength of the porous vegetation concrete, which is attributed to an increase in the early fluidity, promoting the coating of the binder around the aggregates and hence the adherence of the aggregates.The target compressive strength of ≥12 MPa was satisfied by all mixtures except those containing natural jute fibers.

Repeated Freezing-Thawing Cycles
Following 28 days of curing, cyclic freeze-thaw tests were carried out (100 cycles), and the compressive strength was determined.The compressive strength decreased following the freeze-thaw cycles for all mixes, as shown in Figure 12.The decrease was particularly large for the porous concretes with a large void ratio.However, the addition of natural jute fiber suppressed the generation and growth of cracks between aggregates following repeated freeze-thaw cycles.The hydrophilic nature of jute fiber improved the water purification properties and increased the adherence at the surface due to increased hydrogen bonding; it also appeared to increase the freeze-thaw resistance.The freeze-thaw resistance tests with added latex exhibited a decreased compressive strength following the repeated freeze-thaw cycles.The use of latex increased the early fluidity of the porous concrete to promote coating of the binder onto the surface of the aggregates, thereby strengthening this interface and improving the adherence of aggregates into the matrix.Because of this, the decrease in the compressive strength following the freeze-thaw tests was relatively small.Following 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the target of ě80% residual compressive strength was achieved by all mixtures containing blast furnace slag, natural jute fiber and latex, but not by the default mixture.Therefore, to provide freeze-thaw resistance, we should consider the use of blast furnace slag aggregate, natural jute fiber and latex.

Repeated Freezing-Thawing Cycles
Following 28 days of curing, cyclic freeze-thaw tests were carried out (100 cycles), and the compressive strength was determined.The compressive strength decreased following the freezethaw cycles for all mixes, as shown in Figure 12.The decrease was particularly large for the porous concretes with a large void ratio.However, the addition of natural jute fiber suppressed the generation and growth of cracks between aggregates following repeated freeze-thaw cycles.The hydrophilic nature of jute fiber improved the water purification properties and increased the adherence at the surface due to increased hydrogen bonding; it also appeared to increase the freeze-thaw resistance.The freeze-thaw resistance tests with added latex exhibited a decreased compressive strength following the repeated freeze-thaw cycles.The use of latex increased the early fluidity of the porous concrete to promote coating of the binder onto the surface of the aggregates, thereby strengthening this interface and improving the adherence of aggregates into the matrix.Because of this, the decrease in the compressive strength following the freeze-thaw tests was relatively small.Following 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the target of ≥80% residual compressive strength was achieved by all mixtures containing blast furnace slag, natural jute fiber and latex, but not by the default mixture.Therefore, to provide freeze-thaw resistance, we should consider the use of blast furnace slag aggregate, natural jute fiber and latex.

Plant Growth
Figure 13 shows the temperature and relative humidity as a function of time in the test chamber that was used to monitor vegetation.The average temperature was 25.4 °C and the average relative humidity was 48.8%.The daily maximum temperature was 30 °C, and the daily minimum temperature was 24 °C.Two days after sowing, seeds began to sprout, as shown in Figure 14. Figure 15 shows the results of vegetation monitoring, and Figure 16 shows photographs of the grass shoots for the different samples at various times.On the third day, the length of the grass shoots was 12-13 mm.After 9 days, the length began to differ among the specimens.After 11 days, the mixture with latex exhibited the longest grass shoots (91 mm), while the default mixture had the shortest shoots (80 mm).After 25 days, the mixture with latex exhibited the longest grass (152 mm), which was 28 mm longer than that of the default mixture.The mixtures with blast furnace slag aggregate and natural jute fiber exhibited similar length grass shoots, which were approximately 10 mm longer than those of the default mixture.When blast furnace slag aggregate was used, the vegetation growth was more active.Furthermore, the use of latex promoted plant growth.This is attributed to the latex forming a coating to prevent toxic components from leaching out of the cement.

Plant Growth
Figure 13 shows the temperature and relative humidity as a function of time in the test chamber that was used to monitor vegetation.The average temperature was 25.4 ˝C and the average relative humidity was 48.8%.The daily maximum temperature was 30 ˝C, and the daily minimum temperature was 24 ˝C.Two days after sowing, seeds began to sprout, as shown in Figure 14. Figure 15 shows the results of vegetation monitoring, and Figure 16 shows photographs of the grass shoots for the different samples at various times.On the third day, the length of the grass shoots was 12-13 mm.After 9 days, the length began to differ among the specimens.After 11 days, the mixture with latex exhibited the longest grass shoots (91 mm), while the default mixture had the shortest shoots (80 mm).After 25 days, the mixture with latex exhibited the longest grass (152 mm), which was 28 mm longer than that of the default mixture.The mixtures with blast furnace slag aggregate and natural jute fiber exhibited similar length grass shoots, which were approximately 10 mm longer than those of the default mixture.When blast furnace slag aggregate was used, the vegetation growth was more active.Furthermore, the use of latex promoted plant growth.This is attributed to the latex forming a coating to prevent toxic components from leaching out of the cement.

Water Purification
Figures [17][18][19][20] show the results of the water purification tests.Following vegetation, the density of ammonia-nitrogen in the inflow water was 19.89 mg/L and that in the outflow water was in the range 17.73-18.42mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 7.38%-10.85%.Following vegetation, the density of total nitrogen in the inflow water was 20.26 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 18.36-19.02mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 6.14%-9.40%.The treatment efficiencies before and after vegetation were similar, and did not differ significantly among the mixtures.Following vegetation, the density of phosphorate-phosphorus in the inflow water was 1.96 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 1.74-1.79mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 9.57%-11.24%.The phosphorate-phosphorus treatment efficiency before vegetation was in the range 18.00%-31.00%,which is significantly greater than that after vegetation.Following vegetation, the density of total phosphorus in the inflow water was 2.34 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 2.06-2.26mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 6.36%-11.78%.Prior to vegetation, the total phosphorus treatment efficiency was in the range 12.66%-24.45%,which is significantly greater than that after vegetation.It appears that the residence time (10 min) was too short to obtain a significant water purification effect due to the vegetation.Furthermore, as the phosphorus materials (which are usually removed by precipitation and water purification) accumulated in the specimen during the tests without vegetation, the effects of vegetation on water purification were limited.Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that residual materials were used as nutrient sources following sprouting of the seeds.The difference in treatment efficiency among the mixtures was not

Water Purification
Figures 17-20 show the results of the water purification tests.Following vegetation, the density of ammonia-nitrogen in the inflow water was 19.89 mg/L and that in the outflow water was in the range 17.73-18.42mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 7.38%-10.85%.Following vegetation, the density of total nitrogen in the inflow water was 20.26 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 18.36-19.02mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 6.14%-9.40%.The treatment efficiencies before and after vegetation were similar, and did not differ significantly among the mixtures.Following vegetation, the density of phosphorate-phosphorus in the inflow water was 1.96 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 1.74-1.79mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 9.57%-11.24%.The phosphorate-phosphorus treatment efficiency before vegetation was in the range 18.00%-31.00%,which is significantly greater than that after vegetation.Following vegetation, the density of total phosphorus in the inflow water was 2.34 mg/L, and that in the outflow water was in the range 2.06-2.26mg/L, which corresponds to a treatment efficiency of 6.36%-11.78%.Prior to vegetation, the total phosphorus treatment efficiency was in the range 12.66%-24.45%,which is significantly greater than that after vegetation.It appears that the residence time (10 min) was too short to obtain a significant water purification effect due to the vegetation.Furthermore, as the phosphorus materials (which are usually removed by precipitation and water purification) accumulated in the specimen during the tests without vegetation, the effects of vegetation on water purification were limited.Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that residual materials were used as nutrient sources following sprouting of the seeds.The difference in treatment efficiency among the mixtures was not significant.The porous vegetation concrete formed using the blast furnace slag aggregates exhibited the greatest water purification effect for phosphorate-phosphorus and total phosphorus.significant.The porous vegetation concrete formed using the blast furnace slag aggregates exhibited the greatest water purification effect for phosphorate-phosphorus and total phosphorus.significant.The porous vegetation concrete formed using the blast furnace slag aggregates exhibited the greatest water purification effect for phosphorate-phosphorus and total phosphorus.

Optimum Mix
The porous vegetation concrete with latex exhibited increased compressive strength, a larger void ratio and improved freeze-thaw resistance compared with the default mix.With almost all the mixtures that included latex, the target specifications were satisfied.In terms of the vegetation capacity in particular, the use of latex provided highly favorable results.Therefore, considering the mechanical properties of porous vegetation concrete, as well as the freeze-thaw resistance, vegetation capacity and water purification capacity, the mix with latex and blast furnace slag aggregate was selected as the optimum mixture (see Table 7).The compressive strength of the

Optimum Mix
The porous vegetation concrete with latex exhibited increased compressive strength, a larger void ratio and improved freeze-thaw resistance compared with the default mix.With almost all the mixtures that included latex, the target specifications were satisfied.In terms of the vegetation capacity in particular, the use of latex provided highly favorable results.Therefore, considering the mechanical properties of porous vegetation concrete, as well as the freeze-thaw resistance, vegetation capacity and water purification capacity, the mix with latex and blast furnace slag aggregate was selected as the optimum mixture (see Table 7).The compressive strength of the resulting optimum mixture was 13.46 MPa, the void ratio was 27.41%, and the residual compressive strength following 100 freeze-thaw cycles was 87.38%.

Conclusions
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the porous vegetation concrete.Target performance metrics of the porous vegetation concrete were a compressive strength of ě12 MPa, a void ratio of ě25%, and residual compressive strength of ě80% following 100 freeze-thaw cycles.Vegetation capacity tests and water purification tests were carried out to identify the optimal mixing ratio.The results of this study can be summarized as follows.
(1) Characterization of the physical and mechanical properties of the porous vegetation concrete showed that mixtures that contained latex exhibited favorable compressive strength, void ratio and freeze-thaw resistance.(2) Vegetation growth tests showed that plant growth was more active when blast furnace slag aggregate was used.The use of latex was also found to promote plant growth, which is attributed to the latex forming a film coating that prevents toxic compounds from being leached from the cement.
(3) A water purification test revealed no clear differences among the mixtures.Comparisons of mixes with and without vegetation showed greater water purification effects on phosphorate-phosphorus and total phosphorus with vegetation.(4) The mix containing blast furnace slag aggregate and latex satisfied all of the target performance metrics; i.e., compressive strength of ě12MPa, a void ratio of ě25%, and residual compressive strength following 100 freeze-thaw cycles of 80%, as well as excellent plant growth and water purification properties.For these reasons, this mix was identified as the optimal mixture.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Void ratio result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Compressive strength result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Void ratio result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Void ratio result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Compressive strength result of porous vegetation concrete.Figure 11.Compressive strength result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Compressive strength result of porous vegetation concrete.Figure 11.Compressive strength result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Repeated freezing and thawing test results result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Repeated freezing and thawing test results result of porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Graph of temperature and humidity.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Photo of plants germination on porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Photo of plants germination on porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Photo of plants germination on porous vegetation concrete.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.Figure 15.Graph of plants growth in laboratory.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.Photo of plants length research in laboratory.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.Photo of plants length research in laboratory.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.Ion adsorption test results of Plain mix.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Ion adsorption test results of BFS mix.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.Ion adsorption test results of Plain mix.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.Ion adsorption test results of Plain mix.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Ion adsorption test results of BFS mix.

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.Ion adsorption test results of BFS-fiber mix.

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.Ion adsorption test results of BFS-fiber mix.

Figure 20 .
Figure 20.Ion adsorption test results of BFS-latex mix.

Figure 20 .
Figure 20.Ion adsorption test results of BFS-latex mix.

Table 1 .
Physical properties of blast furnace slag cement.

Table 2 .
Physical properties of coarse aggregate.

Table 3 .
Test result of heavy metals extraction for blast furnace slag aggregate.
N/A: Non-Analysis.

Table 4 .
Properties of natural jute fibers.

Table 6 .
Mixture design of porous vegetation concrete.