Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Analyze Purchase Intention Determinants of Sustainable Argan Oil Among Moroccan Consumers
Abstract
1. Introduction
- To assess how attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence Moroccan consumers’ intention to purchase ecological argan oil.
- To examine the role of willingness to pay in translating pro-environmental drivers into purchase intention.
- To evaluate the influence of ecological literacy and environmental concern on consumers’ attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and purchase intentions.
2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Attitude Towards Purchasing Green Products
2.2. Subjective Norm
2.3. Perceived Behavioral Control
2.4. Willingness to Pay
2.5. Ecological Literacy
2.6. Ecological Concern
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
3.2. Measures
3.3. Tools for Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Testing of Reliability and Validity of the Measurement Model
4.2. Testing of the Structural Equation Model
5. Discussion
5.1. Core TPB Relationships
5.2. Role of Ecological Literacy
5.3. Role of Environmental
6. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cadario, R.; Chandon, P. Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges. Food Policy 2019, 85, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Pontrandolfo, P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1608–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolnicar, S.; Grün, B.; Leisch, F. Market Segmentation Analysis: Understanding It, Doing It, and Making It Useful; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, A.N.; Sharaf, S. The Impact of Green Advertising Practices Dimensions on Consumer Green Purchasing Behavior in Food Sector of Afghanistan. Integr. J. Res. Arts Humanit. 2023, 3, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hervey, M.; Patricia, M.L.; Caroline Castano, M.N.; Patricia Zamuco, M.L. Consumer Behavior and Practices towards Green Marketing of Food Enterprises. J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2022, 4, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aomari, A. The responsible consumption: Factor of the development of environmental responsibility in Morocco. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. 2014, 2, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morocco Foodex. Rapport Annuel des Exportations Agroalimentaires; Morocco Foodex: Agadir, Morocco, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- ANDZOA. Rapport Annuel sur la Forêt D’arganier et les Initiatives de Valorisation; ANDZOA: Agadir, Morocco, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Lybbert, T.J.; Aboudrare, A.; Chaloud, D.; Magnan, N.; Nash, M. Booming markets for Moroccan argan oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic argan forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 13963–13968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fielding, K.S.; Hornsey, M.J. A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manaktola, K.; Jauhari, V. Exploring consumer attitude and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2007, 19, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, R.E.; Blanchard, C.M.; Matheson, D.H. A multicomponent model of the theory of planned behaviour. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2006, 11, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Peng, N. Green hotel knowledge and tourists’ staying behavior. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 2211–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Kim, Y. An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.B.; Chai, L.T. Attitude towards the Environment and Green Products: Consumers’ Perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanner, C.; Kast, S.W. Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 883–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude—Behavioral intention” gap. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2006, 19, 169–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grankvist, G.; Biel, A. The impact of environmental information on professional purchasers’ choice of products. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2007, 16, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padel, S.; Foster, C. Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 606–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J.; Ölander, F. Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maichum, K.; Parichatnon, S.; Peng, K.C. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A.; Homaid, A.; Alaswadi, W. Factors influencing green purchase behaviour among young consumers in Saudi Arabia. Transnatl. Mark. J. 2020, 8, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auza, K.A.; Mouloudj, K. Using the theory of planned behavior to explore green food purchase intentions. Univ. South Fla. M3 Cent. Publ. 2021, 5, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.; Ploeger, A. Explaining consumers’ intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Appetite 2019, 133, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 11, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.S. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Commun. Stud. 2000, 51, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivis, A.; Sheeran, P.; Armitage, C.J. Expanding the Affective and Normative Components of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Anticipated Affect and Moral Norms. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 39, 2985–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S.; Lam, T.; Hsu, C.H.C. Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication Intention: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2006, 30, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ham, M.; Jeger, M.; Ivković, A.F. The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraz. 2015, 28, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Shen, G.Q.; Choi, S. Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention. J. Environ. Psychol. 2017, 50, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, B.; Enkawa, T.; Schvaneveldt, S.J. The role of individualism vs. collectivism in the formation of repurchase intent: A cross-industry comparison of the effects of cultural and personal values. J. Econ. Psychol. 2015, 51, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede Insights. Country Comparison: Morocco. Available online: https://www.theculturefactor.com (accessed on 12 February 2024).
- Armitage, C.J.; Conner, M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 40, 471–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vazifehdoust, H.; Taleghani, M.; Esmaeilpour, F.; Nazari, K.; Khadang, M. Purchasing green to become greener: Factors influence consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2013, 3, 2489–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartono, D.; Harahap, B.N. Willingness to Pay for Drinking Water and Sanitation Availability in Indonesia. Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS). 2007. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/unp/wpaper/200712.html (accessed on 12 February 2024).
- Anderson, E.W. Customer satisfaction and price tolerance. Mark Lett. 1996, 7, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.L.; Chang, C.Y.; Yansritakul, C. Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 34, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P.; Zaltman, G. Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. J Mark. 1971, 35, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laroche, M.; Bergeron, J.; Barbaro-Forleo, G. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consum. Mark. 2001, 18, 503–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, C. Consumers’ purchase intention of green products: An investigation of the drivers and moderating variable. Elixir Mark. Manag. 2013, 1, 14503–14509. [Google Scholar]
- Ng, M.; Law, M.; Zhang, S. Predicting purchase intention of electric vehicles in Hong Kong. Australas. Mark. J. 2018, 26, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, N. Global Consumers Are Willing to Put Their Money Where Their Heart Is When It Comes to Goods and Services from Companies Committed to Social Responsibility; Nielsen: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Gilg, A.; Barr, S.; Ford, N. Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures 2005, 37, 481–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, N.; Choi, Y.J.; Youn, C.; Lee, Y. Does Green Fashion Retailing Make Consumers More Eco-friendly? The influence of green fashion products and campaigns on green consciousness and behavior. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2012, 30, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahesh, N. Influence of Consumers’ Socio-Economic Characteristics and Attitude on Purchase Intention of Green Products. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 4, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, M.M. Antecedents of Egyptian consumers’ green purchase intentions: A hierarchical multivariate regression model. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2006, 19, 97–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.T. Consumer characteristics and social influence factors on green purchasing intentions. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2014, 32, 738–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aman, A.H.L.; Amran, H.; dan Zuhal, H. The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Concern on Green Purchase Intention the Role of Attitude as a Mediating Variable. Br. J. Arts Soc. Sci. 2012, 7, 145–167. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, J.C.; Waliczek, T.M.; Zajicek, J.M. Relationship Between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude of High School Students. J. Environ. Educ. 2010, 30, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorman, C.; Diehl, K.; Brinberg, D.; Kidwell, B. Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice. J. Consum. Res. 2004, 31, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.J.; Kahlor, L.A. What, Me Worry? The Role of Affect in Information Seeking and Avoidance. Sci. Commun. 2013, 35, 189–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Yun, S.; Lee, J. Can Companies Induce Sustainable Consumption? The Impact of Knowledge and Social Embeddedness on Airline Sustainability Programs in the U.S. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3338–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamantopoulos, A.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Sinkovics, R.R.; Bohlen, G.M. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res. 2003, 56, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Bohlen, G.M.; Diamantopoulos, A. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. Eur. J. Mark. 1996, 30, 35–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alibeli, M.; White, N. The effects of country, gender, social class, and education on college students’ concern about the environment in five arab countries. Crime Punishm. Law 2009, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Davies, A.; Titterington, A.J.; Cochrane, C. Who buys organic food? A profile of the purchasers of organicfood in Northern Ireland. Br. Food J. 1995, 97, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutchins, R.K.; Greenhalgh, L.A. Organic confusion: Sustaining competitive advantage. Nutr. Food Sci. 1995, 95, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, C.B. Environmental concern, attitude toward green corporate practices, and green consumer behavior in the United States and Canada. ASBBS e-J. 2013, 9, 62. [Google Scholar]
- Bamberg, S. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, P.; Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.F.; Tung, P.J. Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 36, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunlap, R.E.; Xiao, C.; McCright, A.M. Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environ. Polit. 2001, 10, 23–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, S.H. The role of Islamic values on green purchase intention. J. Islam. Mark. 2014, 5, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taufique, K.M.R.; Vaithianathan, S. A fresh look at understanding Green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2011; 427p, Available online: https://books.google.com/books/about/Principles_and_Practice_of_Structural_Eq.html?hl=fr&id=mGf3Ex59AX0C (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; 785p, Available online: https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=JlRaAAAAYAAJ&pgis=1 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- Croasmun, J.T.; Ostrom, L. Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. J. Adult Educ. 2011, 40, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Joshi, A.; Kale, S.; Chandel, S.; Pal, D.K. Likert scale: Explored and explained. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeVellis, R.F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, R.; Lau, M.M.; Lam, A.Y.C. Factors affecting consumer attitude towards organic food: An empirical study in Hong Kong. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2015, 25, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, H.Y.; Janda, S. Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.I.; Chen, Y.J. The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on Purchase Intention for Green Products. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2014, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afroz, R.; Masud, M.M.; Akhtar, R.; Islam, M.A.; Duasa, J.B. Consumer purchase intention towards environmentally friendly vehicles: An empirical investigation in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 16153–16163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I. Elements of statistical description and estimation. Psychom. Theory 1994, 3, 158. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, H.W.; Hocevar, D. Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept. First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97, 562–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mufidah, I.; Jiang, B.C.; Lin, S.C.; Chin, J.; Rachmaniati, Y.P.; Persada, S.F. Understanding the Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Ecolabel Product through Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model in Developing and Developed Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarkiainen, A.; Sundqvist, S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleki, R.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J. Factor affecting consumer’s intention to purchase organic food: Empirical study from Malaysian context. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2020, 23, 168–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giao, K.H.N.; Ngan, N.T.K.; Phuc, N.P.H.; Tuan, H.Q.; Hong, H.K.; Anh, H.D.T.; Nhu, D.T.H.; Lan, N. How destination image factors affect domestic tourists revisit intention to Ba Ria-Vung Tau province, Vietnam. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuk, F.A. Consumers’ willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness. Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, M.L.; McCluskey, J.J.; Mittelhammer, R.C. Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-labeled Apples? J. Consum. Aff. 2002, 36, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, B. Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach to Understand the Purchasing Behaviour for Environmentally Sustainable Products. Doctoral Dissertation, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, A.; Thyagaraj, K.S. Consumer’s Intention to Purchase Green Brands: The Roles of Environmental Concern, Environmental Knowledge and Self Expressive Benefits. Curr. World Environ. 2015, 10, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chekima, B. Consumer values and green products consumption in malaysia: A structural equation modelling approach. In Green Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 206–231. [Google Scholar]
- Eze, U.C.; Ndubisi, N.O. Green Buyer Behavior: Evidence from Asia Consumers. J. Asian Afr. Stud. 2013, 48, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amyx, D.A.; DeJong, P.F.; Lin, X.; Chakraborty, G.; Wiener, J.L. Influencers of Purchase Intentions for Ecologically Safe Products: An Exploratory Study. In Marketing Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the 1994 American Marketing Association Winter Educators Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 19–22 February 1994; AMA Chicago: Chicago, IL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, Y.T.H.; Nguyen, H.V. An alternative view of the millennial green product purchase: The roles of online product review and self-image congruence. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2021, 33, 231–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S. Consumers’ Value, Environmental Consciousness, and Willingness to Pay more toward Green-Apparel Products. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2011, 2, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Variable | Grouped Sample (881) | Online Survey (761) | Direct Interview (120) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 382 | 43.4 | 327 | 43.0 | 55 | 45.8 |
| Female | 499 | 56.6 | 434 | 57.0 | 65 | 54.2 |
| Age | ||||||
| 46 or over | 67 | 7.6 | 59 | 7.8 | 8 | 6.7 |
| 36–45 years old | 137 | 15.6 | 121 | 15.9 | 16 | 13.3 |
| 26–35 years old | 395 | 44.8 | 338 | 44.4 | 57 | 47.5 |
| 18–25 years old | 282 | 32.0 | 243 | 31.9 | 39 | 32.5 |
| Academic level | ||||||
| Doctorate or higher | 162 | 18.4 | 153 | 20.1 | 9 | 7.5 |
| Bac + 5 | 540 | 61.3 | 461 | 60.6 | 79 | 65.8 |
| Bac + 3 | 124 | 14.1 | 106 | 13.9 | 18 | 15.0 |
| Bac + 2 | 51 | 5.8 | 38 | 5.0 | 13 | 10.8 |
| Baccalaureate | 4 | 0.5 | 3 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.8 |
| Household size | ||||||
| More than 10 pers | 3 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 to 10 people | 48 | 5.4 | 42 | 5.5 | 6 | 5.0 |
| 4 to 6 persons | 406 | 46.1 | 342 | 44.9 | 64 | 53.3 |
| Less than 4 pers | 424 | 48.1 | 374 | 49.1 | 50 | 41.7 |
| Net annual income | ||||||
| More than 360,001 | 20 | 2.3 | 18 | 2.4 | 2 | 1.7 |
| 240,001–360,000 | 39 | 4.4 | 33 | 4.3 | 4 | 3.3 |
| 180,001–240,000 | 38 | 4.3 | 34 | 4.5 | 14 | 11.7 |
| 130,001–180,000 | 111 | 12.6 | 97 | 12.7 | 13 | 10.8 |
| 110,001–130,000 | 105 | 11.9 | 92 | 12.1 | 11 | 9.2 |
| 90,001–110,000 | 98 | 11.1 | 87 | 11.4 | 7 | 5.8 |
| 70,001–90,000 | 48 | 5.4 | 41 | 5.4 | 14 | 11.7 |
| 50,001–70,000 | 71 | 8.1 | 57 | 7.5 | 4 | 3.3 |
| 30,001–50,000 | 40 | 4.5 | 36 | 4.7 | 11 | 9.2 |
| 0–30,000 dirhams | 311 | 35.3 | 266 | 35.0 | 45 | 37.5 |
| Variables | Mean | Standard Deviation | Factor Saturation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological literacy [23,49] | ||||
| LE1 | You prefer to check eco-labels and certifications on green products before you buy. | 5.14 | 1.77 | 0.57 |
| LE2 | You prefer to get information about green products before you buy them. | 5.7 | 1.62 | 0.52 |
| LE3 | Your environmental knowledge helps you buy eco-friendly products and packaging. | 4.99 | 1.93 | 0.55 |
| LE4 | You know about biodegradable products and packaging. | 4.68 | 2.04 | 0.61 |
| Environmental concerns [73] | ||||
| PE1 | You prefer to check eco-labels and certifications on green products before buying them. | 5.51 | 1.86 | 0.59 |
| PE2 | You prefer to obtain information on green products before buying them. | 5.94 | 1.73 | 0.65 |
| PE3 | Your environmental knowledge helps you buy eco-friendly products and packaging. | 5.97 | 1.72 | 0.65 |
| PE4 | You know about biodegradable products and packaging. | 5.9 | 1.78 | 0.61 |
| Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products [23,74] | ||||
| APRE1 | Protecting the natural ecosystem is important to you when you decide to buy a product. | 5.2 | 1.85 | 0.52 |
| APRE2 | Would you prefer an ecological product to a conventional one? | 5.98 | 1.42 | 0.55 |
| APRE3 | The adoption of environmentally friendly techniques is necessary for the preservation of the natural ecosystem. | 6.35 | 1.08 | 0.56 |
| APRE4 | You think that buying ecological products is a positive step. | 6.1 | 1.24 | 0.52 |
| Subjective norms [75] | ||||
| NS1 | Does your family share your eco-friendly attitude? | 4.94 | 1.66 | 0.54 |
| NS2 | Do your friends share your respect for the environment? | 4.41 | 1.60 | 0.55 |
| NS3 | Your family shares your decision to buy ecological products. | 4.93 | 1.76 | 0.50 |
| NS4 | Your friends share your decision to buy eco-friendly products. | 4.48 | 1.72 | 0.53 |
| Perceived behavioral control [23] | ||||
| CCP1 | You think you’ll be able to buy eco-friendly products in the future. | 4.68 | 1.78 | 0.51 |
| CCP2 | You have the financial resources to buy eco-friendly products. | 4.56 | 1.86 | 0.56 |
| CCP3 | You have the will to buy eco-friendly argan products. | 4.23 | 1.79 | 0.58 |
| CCP4 | You are likely to have many opportunities to buy eco-friendly argan products. | 4.38 | 1.78 | 0.58 |
| Willingness to pay for sustainable argan oil “For sustainable argan oil, I am willing to pay a premium price higher than the conventional argan oil price of:” | ||||
| CAP1 | Between 0 and 10 dirhams | 3.51 | 1.55 | 0.55 |
| CAP2 | Between 10 and 20 dirhams | 3.43 | 1.47 | 0.52 |
| CAP3 | Between 20 and 30 dirhams | 3.31 | 1.45 | 0.61 |
| CAP4 | Between 30 and 40 dirhams | 2.77 | 1.38 | 0.67 |
| CAP5 | Between 40 and 50 dirhams | 2.46 | 1.32 | 0.62 |
| CAP6 | Between 50 and 100 dirhams | 2.17 | 1.26 | 0.54 |
| CAP7 | Between 100 and 200 dirhams | 1.93 | 1.17 | 0.57 |
| Purchase intention for sustainable argan oil [76] | ||||
| INT1 | You are likely to buy eco-friendly argan oil rather than conventional argan oil. | 4.44 | 1.90 | 0.62 |
| INT2 | You plan to buy eco-friendly argan oil the next time you need argan oil. | 5.02 | 1.87 | 0.65 |
| INT3 | You would actively look for eco-friendly argan oil when shopping. | 4.88 | 1.72 | 0.72 |
| INT4 | You will choose eco-friendly argan oil when it is available. | 4.86 | 1.64 | 0.74 |
| INT5 | You intend to purchase eco-friendly argan oil in the near future. | 4.93 | 1.65 | 0.79 |
| Question Item | Cronbach’s α | Standardized Factor Loading | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude towards purchasing green products (APRE) | APRE1 | 0.729 | 0.592 | 0.75 | 0.43 |
| APRE2 | 0.818 | ||||
| APRE3 | 0.544 | ||||
| APRE4 | 0.651 | ||||
| Perceived behavioral control (CCP) | CCP1 | 0.805 | 0.502 | 0.79 | 0.51 |
| CCP2 | 0.429 | ||||
| CCP3 | 0.881 | ||||
| CCP4 | 0.905 | ||||
| Subjective norm (NS) | NS1 | 0.833 | 0.764 | 0.88 | 0.64 |
| NS2 | 0.755 | ||||
| NS3 | 0.72 | ||||
| NS4 | 0.947 | ||||
| Eco-literacy (LE) | LE1 | 0.701 | 0.717 | 0.73 | 0.48 |
| LE2 | 0.736 | ||||
| LE3 | 0.609 | ||||
| Environmental concern (PE) | PE1 | 0.951 | 0.783 | 0.95 | 0.83 |
| PE2 | 0.942 | ||||
| PE3 | 0.987 | ||||
| PE4 | 0.926 | ||||
| Willingness to pay for sustainable argan’s oil (CAP) | CAP1 | 0.896 | 0.346 | 0.88 | 0.53 |
| CAP2 | 0.469 | ||||
| CAP3 | 0.644 | ||||
| CAP4 | 0.851 | ||||
| CAP5 | 0.979 | ||||
| CAP6 | 0.871 | ||||
| CAP7 | 0.704 | ||||
| Intention to buy sustainable argan’s oil | INT 1 | 0.893 | 0.646 | 0.80 | 0.65 |
| INT 2 | 0.673 | ||||
| INT 3 | 0.853 | ||||
| INT 4 | 0.894 | ||||
| INT 5 | 0.916 |
| CAP | PE | LE | NS | CCP | APRE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAP | — | |||||
| PE | 0.112 | — | ||||
| LE | 0.052 | 0.291 | — | |||
| NS | 0.129 | 0.037 | 0.307 | — | ||
| CCP | 0.125 | 0.022 | 0.366 | 0.170 | — | |
| APRE | 0.169 | 0.216 | 0.592 | 0.453 | 0.259 | — |
| Fit Indices | Criteria | Indicators | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chi-square | p > 0.05 | 1210.989 | [68] |
| Chi-square/df | <5.00 | 4.485 | |
| Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) | >0.90 | 0.905 | |
| Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) | >0.90 | 0.876 | |
| Relative Fit Index (RFI) | >0.90 | 0.914 | |
| Normed Fit Index (NFI) | >0.90 | 0.928 | |
| Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | >0.90 | 0.943 | |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | <0.08 | 0.063 | |
| Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) | <0.08 | 0.0812 |
| Fit Indices | Criteria | Indicators | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chi-square | p > 0.05 | 1802.531 | [68] |
| Chi-square/df | <5.00 | 4.462 | |
| Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) | >0.90 | 0.884 | |
| Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) | >0.90 | 0.857 | |
| Relative Fit Index (RFI) | >0.90 | 0.900 | |
| Normed Fit Index (NFI) | >0.90 | 0.913 | |
| Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | >0.90 | 0.931 | |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | <0.08 | 0.063 | |
| Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) | <0.08 | 0.090 |
| Hypotheses | Constructs Relationships | Standardized Estimation (β) | Proposed Effect | Significance (p) | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 (+) | APRE → INT | 0.695 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H2 (+) | NS → INT | −0.025 | Negative | 0.334 | Rejected |
| H3 (+) | CCP → INT | 0.171 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H4 (+) | CAP → INT | 0.173 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H5 (+) | LE → INT | −0.02 | Negative | 0.743 | Rejected |
| H6 (+) | PE → INT | −0.046 | Negative | 0.126 | Rejected |
| H7 (+) | LE → APRE | 0.678 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H8 (+) | PE → APRE | 0.029 | Positive | 0.444 | Rejected |
| H9 (+) | LE → NS | 0.367 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H10 (+) | PE → NS | −0.07 | Negative | * | Rejected |
| H11 (+) | LE → CCP | 0.441 | Positive | *** | Accepted |
| H12 (+) | PE → CCP | −0.108 | Negative | ** | Rejected |
| H13 (+) | LE → CAP | 0.101 | Positive | ** | Accepted |
| H14 (+) | PE → CAP | 0.094 | Positive | * | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Noureddine, I.; Majid, B.; Mohammed, D.; Fayçal, B. Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Analyze Purchase Intention Determinants of Sustainable Argan Oil Among Moroccan Consumers. Sustainability 2026, 18, 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020637
Noureddine I, Majid B, Mohammed D, Fayçal B. Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Analyze Purchase Intention Determinants of Sustainable Argan Oil Among Moroccan Consumers. Sustainability. 2026; 18(2):637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020637
Chicago/Turabian StyleNoureddine, Ibnezzyn, Benabdellah Majid, Dehhaoui Mohammed, and Benchekroun Fayçal. 2026. "Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Analyze Purchase Intention Determinants of Sustainable Argan Oil Among Moroccan Consumers" Sustainability 18, no. 2: 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020637
APA StyleNoureddine, I., Majid, B., Mohammed, D., & Fayçal, B. (2026). Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Analyze Purchase Intention Determinants of Sustainable Argan Oil Among Moroccan Consumers. Sustainability, 18(2), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020637

