Recovery for Resilience: The Mediating Role of Work–Life Balance on the Quality of Life of Women Employees

: Employees often have to cope with unprecedented challenges in their working and living conditions—caused by organizational and socioeconomic changes and/or crises—by showing re-sourcefulness and adaptability. Especially working women who bear a heavier burden strive harder to achieve balance between their work and family lives, and build resilience to maintain their quality of life. It is, therefore, important to develop a better understanding of the mechanisms women employ to strengthen their resilience by combining different roles without compromising their quality of life. This survey research examines which coping strategies and after-work experiences contribute to women’s quality of life by improving their sense of work–life balance (WLB). Data collected from 654 women employees in Greece conﬁrmed the positive effect of WLB on quality of life. Furthermore, being able to choose among after-work experiences, learning or doing challenging things, work disengagement, and problem solving positively inﬂuence WLB. In contrast, continuing work at home, relaxation, and avoidance coping negatively affect WLB. It appears that taking time to relax and avoidance coping come into conﬂict with women’s socially acceptable behavior at home. The importance of social relationships is also highlighted by the positive inﬂuence that support seeking, as a coping mechanism, has on women’s quality of life.


Introduction
Employees often have to cope with unprecedented challenges in their working and living conditions-caused by organizational and socioeconomic changes and/or crises-by showing resourcefulness and adaptability.It is, therefore, important to develop a better understanding of the mechanisms employees employ to strengthen their resilience by combining different roles without compromising their quality of life.Achieving this can be even more challenging for working women, who are often burdened with more duties and responsibilities in their family lives, especially childcare and household chores [1,2].
Work-life balance is more complex than a simple conflict between different spheres of life, and it is more than just an aspect of employees' well-being.WLB is a matter related to human rights, gender equality, and the sustainable development of our communities [3][4][5].Sustainability is the central driver of societal growth, ensuring better living standards for people and a better future for generations to come.The UN has established 17 sustainable development goals linked to improving all aspects of quality of life.To achieve at least 3 of these goals (SDG03, good health and well-being; SDG05, gender equality; and SDG08, decent work and economic growth), we need to tackle WLB issues.
The importance of recognizing the social dimension of WLB is stressed by [6].According to the authors, some conceptualizations of work-life balance focus on self-reports from individuals (e.g., their self-reported satisfaction with work and family), as if the experience of WLB is idiosyncratic and the phenomenon solely psychological.In this context, employees are thought to take the primary responsibility of finding a way to reconcile work and life challenges.However, as WLB has a social dimension that should be taken under consideration, Grzywacz and Carlson [6] (p. 458) define it as the "accomplishment of role-related expectations that are negotiated and shared between an individual and his/her role-related partners in the work and family domains".
This study aims to explore how different after-work experiences and coping strategies influence quality of life through the mediating role of work-life balance.The study adds to the corpus of quantitative research on the relationship between WLB and quality of life, as well as on the field research regarding the impact of after-work experiences and copying strategies, as resilience mechanisms, on the quality of life, suggesting that work-life balance mediates this relationship.

Literature Review 2.1. Work-Life Balance and Quality of Life
Work-life balance (WLB) has been generally defined as the capacity of harmonizing or equilibrating work with other aspects of life, such as personal or family life (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12]).The term has also been used to describe the level of engagement in employee and family roles, as well as the corresponding sense of satisfaction with involvement in these roles (e.g., [13][14][15][16]).Reconciling employment with life outside of work, ranging from childcare and housework to leisure and self-development, has been shown to have a tremendous impact on employees' quality of life (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21]).
"Quality of life" is a multidimensional concept connected to the subjective perception of well-being.According to the World Health Organization [22] (p.5), quality of life refers to "individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns".Four basic domains of quality of life have been identified: "physical health", "psychological health", "social relationships", and "environment".In broad terms, "physical health" refers to activities of daily living, work capacity, and physical and medical condition.The "psychological" domain of quality of life is related to feelings, mental processes, self-image, personal beliefs, etc. "Social relationships" refer to personal relationships, social support, and sexual activity.Finally, "environment" is related to a wide variety of facets affecting peoples' lives, such as financial resources, safety, accessibility in social care, opportunities for learning and recreation, and environmental conditions [23].
Quality of life and work are very closely related.Employment has been strongly related to better living conditions.Apart from an adequate wage, which is necessary to ensure a decent living, employment is also important for psychological and social wellbeing.Employment is related among others to social inclusion and integration, personal development, self-esteem, self-worth, and social status (e.g., [24][25][26]).
As more women have entered the labor market and the dual-earner family model is expanding [27], more people are juggling between a paid employment and other life activities.Reconciling work and private life concerns both men and women.However, women are still considered mainly responsible for taking care of "traditional" family duties and tasks (raising children, running the household, organizing family life, caring for older family members, etc.) [28][29][30][31].Although there is considerable progress in addressing gender inequalities, there are still significant differences in the time women spend in unpaid duties and tasks [32].This condition has been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic [28][29][30].In this context, it is even more difficult for women than men to achieve work-life balance.Regarding women's work-life balance, there is a contradiction that we need to consider, to the extent that both spheres involve work, duties, and responsibilities [33].From a feminist perspective, the issue of "double burden" or "double shift" of women has been raised for decades (e.g., [1,2,34]) and remains relevant [3][4][5][6].

Work-Life Balance and After-Work Activities and Experiences
The shift of focus from an individual to a social perspective, which puts emphasis on understanding behavior under a role-related perspective, opens new avenues in the study of WLB.What a person actually does (not his/her ideas, introspections, or attitudes) constitutes the observable signals for role partners (e.g., a spouse, a colleague, or a supervisor) to evaluate his/her performance in terms of how (s)he carries out his/her job, and if (s)he manages to balance the many facets of his/her life.This conceptualization implies that WLB assessment should consider intersubjective appraisals on the accomplishment of role-related expectations, reflecting the complexity and dynamic character of realities people confront in their daily lives.
The assumption that work-related and non-work-related activities and experiences, while away from work, have an impact on WLB leaves room for new research directions.Brough et al. [35] identify three main topics for future research on WLB: technology, mindfulness, and resilience.The WLB and resilience relationship has been discussed in the light of the restorative potential after-work activities can have on individuals.A variety of activities have been found to help employees to rebound from work demands with benefits for their health, quality of life, and work performance [36,37].
According to Sonnentag [38], three categories of leisure time activities have been found to help employees recover from work.The first category refers to "low-effort activities", such as watching TV; the second refers to "social activities", such as meeting or calling a friend; and the third refers to "physical activities", such as exercise or dancing.Apart from activities per se that can help employees to spring back from workload and work stress, Sonnentag and Fritz [39] argue that underlying psychological experiences play a vital role.All employees can recover from work by doing something different, but there are some generic experiences related to recovery from work, such as "relaxation", "control", "mastery", and "psychological detachment".These underlying work recovery experiences refer to activities individuals are engaged in to ". ..unwind and recuperate from work during leisure time" [39] (p.204).Recovery activities can occur on evenings, on weekends, or on vacations [40].
Based on Parkinson and Totterdell's [41] categorization of mood regulation strategies, Sonnentag and Fritz [42] identify "detachment" and "relaxation" as two distraction strategies because they lead to the interruption of whatever a person is doing or thinking in relation to his/her everyday work tasks."Psychological detachment" refers to a sense of being away from work, not only physically but also mentally [43]."Relaxation" refers to free-time activities with no specific demands, of low physical or mental effort, that generate positive feelings, such as listening to music, being in a beautiful natural environment, or loosening up."Mastery experiences" are linked to learning something new and developing skills and competencies.These experiences help individuals feel competent, proficient, confident, and rejuvenated."Control experiences" refer to "the degree to which a person can decide which activity to pursue during leisure time, as well as when and how to pursue this activity" [44] (p.207).
Recovery from work is mainly understood through the prism of two theories: the effortrecovery theory [45] and the conservation of recovery theory [46].These two theories are complementary and assume that recovery is achieved either by abstaining from demands and activities that strain depleted resources or by acquiring new internal resources that provide energy and help the renewal of resources.However, the everyday reality of working women, where there are a lot of demands from multiple roles and exposure to various stressors, may not leave room to relax or recover by being disengaged from work issues.Due to flexible work arrangements or work-life interference and spillover, it may be impossible to become physically, mentally, and emotionally disengaged from work.To deal with work issues, after-work hours may help to be better prepared for the following day or be less worried.
Moreover, in the work-life balance literature, the positive effects of work-to-life spillover under certain conditions have been highlighted (e.g., [47][48][49][50]).Thinking about work during free time is not by definition harmful [36,51].The implications of being cognitively attached to work during nonwork hours depend on the nature of the work-related thoughts one has [39].
In the same vein, Bennett et al. [52] broaden the spectrum of recovery activities by taking into account an additional after-work activity: problem-solving pondering.Reflecting on work-related issues and events after work may have a positive or a negative orientation [53].Employees may not always be able to switch off after work.Some employees tend to reflect on things they have not finished, others consider a problem that needs fixing, and others ponder issues with their coworkers or unpleasant workplace incidents.Employees do not just reflect on past events or problems; they also consider future demands, problems, and occurrences they may anticipate at work [54].Therefore, ruminating after work may not prevent recovery, but in a broader context, it may ultimately help recovery when it targets a solution and becomes a creative process [53,55].
Considering the wide range of after-work experiences, it is important to explore which ones can help employees to spring back, balancing different spheres of their lives and consequently enjoying a better quality of life.Approaching after-work experiences as a resilience mechanism that helps employees cope with workplace adversity can advance work-life balance research, and help us better understand why some employees thrive while others fail to balance personal and work life, feeling drained and exhausted.Particularly for women employees, who are more vulnerable to stress-inducing situations and susceptible to risk factors (e.g., unemployment, underpaid work, single-parent family, "double burden", or "second shift") due to gender inequalities, it is significant to explore all these after-work mechanisms to recover and bounce back (see e.g., [56]).The study of resilient after-work activities and experiences offers excellent potential to support women's rights and gender equality, promoting the well-being of women.

Coping Strategies and Work-Life Balance
People adopt various coping strategies to deal with internal or external situations that they perceive as potentially threatening or stressful.Coping is a two-stage process of a reaction involving cognitive and behavioral mechanisms.First, the situation and the potential harm are evaluated, and then the individual adopts the response behavior to deal with the situation [57].According to the coping theory, there are problem-focused strategies aimed at managing the stressor and emotion-focused strategies aimed at regulating emotions aroused [57,58].Another core distinction is the approach-avoidance distinction.These fundamentally different modes of dealing with stressful situations reflect the tendency of an individual to orient emotionally and cognitively towards or away from the perceived threat [59].
Amirkhan [60], trying to combine the above dichotomies, identified three generic coping strategies: problem solving, seeking support, and avoidance.The problem-solving strategy focuses on managing the stressor through action planning, searching for the best solution, examining alternatives, and setting goals to solve the problems successfully.Seeking support involves utilizing social connections and networks to deal with the stressor, recognizing and expressing one's emotions, talking with others about the issue, and looking for consolation, understanding, and guidance.The avoidance strategy refers to a subset of emotional responses associated with behaviors of ignoring or denying the problem, as well as withdrawing from the stressful situation, by selecting to be left alone or to be absorbed in daydreaming or in other peoples' lives through reading and watching TV.This approach distinguishes the avoidance strategy, emphasizing that both problem orientation and social networks' orientation to address stressful situations reflect an active coping mechanism.
Coping strategies have also been differentiated according to whether they are constructive or destructive.Like active tactics, constructive coping techniques focus on maintaining a positive outlook while actively addressing the stressor.On the contrary, destructive strategies entail stressor avoidance or self-blame, and connect to unhealthy habits, such as substance use and aggressive behaviors [61][62][63].Another classification of coping mechanisms separates passive and active coping, each associated with distinct behavioral characteristics.When faced with stressful conditions, passive coping is classified as maladaptive tactics, such as negative self-targeting and avoidance, whereas active coping is typically connected with a more adaptive adjustment, promoting resilience [64].
Active and positive coping strategies are found to be related to resilience in different professional fields and occupations.For example, police personnel who adopt negative coping strategies report lower job satisfaction and are more likely to experience chronic stress, eventually leading to demotivation, burnout, and resignation, affecting their overall well-being [61,65].Another study found that frontline nurses who use positive coping strategies also exhibit better levels of resilience [66].Generally, research on the relationship of resilience with coping strategies in the workplace highlights the significance of being aware of stressors, accepting and actively coping, keeping a positive attitude, and seeking social support [63,67].The effort to deal with the stressor is positively related to resilience, personal well-being, and growth.On the contrary, adopting avoidance strategies is negatively associated with positive psychological outcomes [63,68].A positive and active view towards life and the adoption of corresponding coping mechanisms increase people's capacity to obtain WLB and, consequently, help them improve their health, well-being, and quality of life in general [69].
Women's multiple roles-as moms, wives, employees, housekeepers, daughters, etc.make it difficult for them to manage everything at no cost.Women often experience a lot of stress and psychological symptoms.The unequal sharing of tasks and responsibilities between men and women gives risks and vulnerability a gendered dimension [70].Therefore, adopting coping strategies that will help women build their resilience is critical.There is evidence that active coping can serve as a protective factor against psychological symptoms emerging from the multiple contexts women are engaged in [71].Although women employees experience inequalities, gender stereotypes, and other obstacles, research has shown that they can adopt various resilient coping mechanisms to succeed, even in male-dominated workplaces [72].Thus, it is paramount to explore how generic coping strategies are related to WLB to promote women employees' quality of life.
Based on the above, the following research questions were formulated: Research question 1: Does work-life balance play a mediating role in the relationship between after-work experiences and quality of life among employed women?
Research question 2: Does work-life balance play a mediating role in the relationship between coping strategies and quality of life among employed women?
The conceptual framework for the study is schematically presented in Figure 1.
such as substance use and aggressive behaviors [61][62][63].Another classification of coping mechanisms separates passive and active coping, each associated with distinct behavioral characteristics.When faced with stressful conditions, passive coping is classified as maladaptive tactics, such as negative self-targeting and avoidance, whereas active coping is typically connected with a more adaptive adjustment, promoting resilience [64].
Active and positive coping strategies are found to be related to resilience in different professional fields and occupations.For example, police personnel who adopt negative coping strategies report lower job satisfaction and are more likely to experience chronic stress, eventually leading to demotivation, burnout, and resignation, affecting their overall well-being [61,65].Another study found that frontline nurses who use positive coping strategies also exhibit better levels of resilience [66].Generally, research on the relationship of resilience with coping strategies in the workplace highlights the significance of being aware of stressors, accepting and actively coping, keeping a positive attitude, and seeking social support [63,67].The effort to deal with the stressor is positively related to resilience, personal well-being, and growth.On the contrary, adopting avoidance strategies is negatively associated with positive psychological outcomes [63,68].A positive and active view towards life and the adoption of corresponding coping mechanisms increase people's capacity to obtain WLB and, consequently, help them improve their health, wellbeing, and quality of life in general [69].
Women's multiple roles-as moms, wives, employees, housekeepers, daughters, etc.-make it difficult for them to manage everything at no cost.Women often experience a lot of stress and psychological symptoms.The unequal sharing of tasks and responsibilities between men and women gives risks and vulnerability a gendered dimension [70].Therefore, adopting coping strategies that will help women build their resilience is critical.There is evidence that active coping can serve as a protective factor against psychological symptoms emerging from the multiple contexts women are engaged in [71].Although women employees experience inequalities, gender stereotypes, and other obstacles, research has shown that they can adopt various resilient coping mechanisms to succeed, even in male-dominated workplaces [72].Thus, it is paramount to explore how generic coping strategies are related to WLB to promote women employees' quality of life.
Based on the above, the following research questions were formulated: Research question 1: Does work-life balance play a mediating role in the relationship between after-work experiences and quality of life among employed women?
Research question 2: Does work-life balance play a mediating role in the relationship between coping strategies and quality of life among employed women?
The conceptual framework for the study is schematically presented in Figure 1.

Sampling and Measurement
The survey research approach was adopted to investigate which after-work experiences and general coping mechanisms enhance women's quality of life by strengthening their work-life balance.The target population comprises female employees working in private and public organizations mainly in the services sector (financial, education, healthcare, social services, etc.) located in the metropolitan area of the Attica prefecture of Greece.A nonprobability sampling methodology was utilized for the study (i.e., snowball and convenience), and oral informed consent was obtained by all participants.
For primary data collection, a structured questionnaire was developed and delivered in paper-and-pencil and electronic format in 2019.No statistically significant differences were detected for the variables under investigation between the early and late respondents and between the two questionnaire formats (paper and pencil and electronic).
All scales used to measure questionnaire constructs were adopted from previous studies (see Table 1) and measured using a 7-point Likert-type scale.Items (see Table A1) were translated into Greek, and the back translation method was utilized to ensure that all items accurately reflected the content of the original scales.Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess internal validity.The results of the analysis, presented in Table 1, indicate that all constructs are above the 0.6 cut-off value proposed by Hair et al. [73], except for relaxation, which is marginally below and was thus not removed from the analysis.Discriminant validity (Table 2) was also assessed by calculating the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE) of each construct, which should be greater than the correlations shared by that construct and the remainder in the model [74].Finally, common method bias was statistically assessed using Harman's single-factor test and the correlation analysis proposed by Bagozzi and colleagues [75].All tests indicated the absence of common method bias.The final sample comprises 654 women employees, working in both the private and public sectors and in various industries and occupations (e.g., large corporations and SME, secondary education and university faculty, nurses and doctors, and civil servants).Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 65 years (mean: 42.7; SD: 9.1).With respect to family status, most respondents were married, while 70% had one or more dependent children; children's ages ranged from infant to adult (mean: 1.9, SD: 1.7).Concerning their educational level, 40% of the research participants had a bachelor's degree, and 17% held a master's degree.Finally, the majority of the respondents belonged to the 11-to 20-year tenure group, while 38% of the participants were frontline employees.The complete profile of the sample is presented in Table 3.

Statistical Analysis Methodology
To empirically test the relationships between the variables of our conceptual framework (see Figure 1), the multivariate statistical analysis technique was used, via structural equation modeling (SEM).SEM enables the modeling of theoretical relationships that goes beyond connections between the different measurements used [79].In particular, the testing of relations in the research model is performed through path analysis, which "involves the estimation of presumed causal relations among observed variables" [80] (p.93).This kind of analysis helps the estimation of both the direct and indirect effects, as well as the total effects, of the independent (or exogenous) constructs on the dependent (or endogenous) construct(s).Indirect or mediator effects "involve one or more intervening variables presumed to "transmit" some of the causal effects of prior variables into subsequent variables" [80] (p.98).Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29 and SPSS Amos 29.

Results
To assess the impact of after-work experiences and coping strategies (independent variables) on quality of life (dependent variable) via work-life balance (mediating variable), two separate structural models were tested.Structural Model 1 (represented in the text with two figures, Figure 2a,b, for clarity) examines the "after-work experiences" multidimensional construct as a WLB antecedent, and Structural Model 2 (Figure 3) the "coping strategies".Both models include the four dimensions of the "quality of life" hyperconstruct, namely, physical and psychological health, social relationships, and environment.In both cases, data fitted the model well (see Table 4).As for their explanatory power, Structural Models 1 and 2 explain 11% and 15% of the variance in the "work-life balance", 14% and 6% of the variance in the "physical health", 17% and 9% of the variance in the "physiological health", 23% and 13% of the variance in the "social relationships", and 15% and 11% of the variance in the "environment" dimensions of quality of life, respectively.

Research Question 1
Of the seven after-work experiences, five were indicated by the analysis to pose a statistically significant impact on WLB (see Figure 2a).More specifically, control (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), mastery (β = 0.13, p < 0.01), and psychological detachment (β = 0.12, p < 0.01) positively affect WLB, while after-work experiences related to engaging in work activities at home has a weak but statistically significant negative influence on WLB (β = −0.07,p < 0.1).Interestingly, relaxation was also found to negatively affect WLB (β = −0.11,p < 0.05).Moreover, WLB has a positive impact on all four "quality of life" dimensions.
As regards nonmediated effects, "quality of life" dimensions were found to be directly affected by several of the after-work experiences included in the model (see Figure 1b).In more detail, social interactions have a statistically significant positive impact on social relationships (β = 0.30, p < 0.001) and on the environment facet of the quality-of-life construct (β = 0.24, p < 0.001) and an equally strong effect on physical and psychological health (β = 0.19, p < 0.001).This finding denotes the centrality of social support for the participants' physical and psychological well-being.
Moreover, relaxation was found to have a statistically significant positive impact on the "physical health" and "environment" dimensions of the quality-of-life construct (β = 0.15 and β = 0.09, p < 0.01, respectively).At the same time, mastery has a positive effect on psychological health (β = 0.18, p < 0.01) and social relationships (β = 0.11, p < 0.01).Finally, experiences related to engaging in work activities at home has a weak but statistically significant negative effect on physical health (β = −0.07,p < 0.1), while experiences of rumination negatively impact the "environment" dimension of quality of life (β = −0.06,p < 0.1).
Overall, the results regarding after-work experiences suggest that some of them are fairly aiding to achieve balance between personal/family and work lives and can be beneficial to one's quality of life.As previously noted, engaging in social interactions to recuperate from work seems to be particularly benign to participants' quality-of-life perceptions.

Research Question 2
Regarding coping strategies, analysis indicated that two of the three strategies in the model (see Figure 3) have a statistically significant effect on work-life balance.In particular, "problem-solving" has a positive direct impact on women's sense of WLB (β = 0.37, p < 0.001), while "avoidance" a negative direct impact (β = −0.11,p < 0.01).Conversely, the "seeking support" dimension does not pose any statistically significant impact on WLB.These results suggest that the achievement of balance between personal and work life can be achieved when people actively seek to solve everyday problems, while passive responses can have a detrimental effect of WLB.
However, "seeking support" and "avoidance" were indicated by the analysis to directly impact quality of life.More specifically, the first was found to be positively associated with the "social relationships" (β = 0.15, p < 0.001) and "environment" (β = 0.08, p < 0.01) dimensions of the "quality of life" construct.On the other hand, avoidance negatively affects both psychological health and social relationships (β = −0.16 and β = −0.11,p < 0.01, respectively).Finally, regarding work-life balance outcomes, analysis replicated the positive influence on all four quality-of-life dimensions, as was the case with Structural Model 1 (see Figure 1a).

Discussion
To assess the effect of work recovery experiences and coping strategies on WLB and the subsequent effect of WLB on the quality of life of women employees, two separate structural models were tested.Structural Model 1 examined the "work recovery experiences" multidimensional construct as a WLB antecedent, and Structural Model 2 examined "coping strategies" as a WLB antecedent.Of the seven after-work experiences included in the study, being able to choose in which work activity to be engaged ("control"), learning new things or doing challenging things ("mastery experiences"), and mental and physical disengagement from work ("psychological detachment") were found to positively influence women's sense of work-life balance.Prior research on training interventions for work-family conflict reduction has also indicated that techniques such as mental blocking or engaging in some kind of activity, e.g., exercise, playing music, and meeting with friends, can enhance positive mood and mind states and relieve stress, preventing work from negatively impacting life at home [86,87].Predictably enough, experiences related to engaging in work activities while not at work were found to negatively affect WLB.However, the findings indicate that relaxation also has a negative impact on women employees' WLB.This finding may at least partially be explained by the guilty feeling women, especially mothers, have in their attempt to fulfill their socially prescribed roles.As Douglas and Michaels [88] explain, one of the three essential features of a good mother as required by the "good mother ideology"-what they call "the new momism"-is having to psychologically, physically, intellectually, and emotionally dedicate themselves to their children.In other words, "good mothers" ". ..are expected to approach motherhood joyfully and completely, while sacrificing themselves to the demands of motherhood" [44] (p.314).In that sense, taking time for oneself just to relax comes into conflict with women's socially acceptable behavior, which demands putting others first.As Guendouzi [89] (p.907) points out, "society still expects that mothers should be with their children for lengthy periods of time and that spending quality time with their families on weekends is a prerequisite to good family dynamics".
The importance placed on social relationships by the women in this study is highlighted by the positive influence that "support seeking", as a coping mechanism, has on their assessment of their quality of life.The value of social networks and support from other people represents employees' social resources or capital, which has been found to reduce the adverse effects of stress and work-family conflict and to promote work and life fulfillment and satisfaction, organizational engagement, and career development (e.g., [90][91][92]).Work-family conflict among women employees has been found to decrease the more they feel that they receive support from their spouse and supervisor [93].These two kinds of support seem to play the most critical role in balancing work and home roles, since they directly affect everyday allocations, arrangements, and time management.National contextual factors may have contributed to the heightened importance of support seeking as a coping mechanism for quality of life among Greek female employees [94].Traditionally, in the welfare regime of Greece (as of other Mediterranean countries), employees turn to family members as their primary source of welfare [95][96][97].Furthermore, the impact of the great recession between 2009 and 2019, a period during which Greece's GDP fell by around 23%, heightened the need for seeking social support as a defense mechanism against increased workload for those still in employment, which resulted from massive jobs losses and acute job insecurity.For women to claim support to combine family and work life, they should feel entitled to ask for support and that they have equal rights to craft their work-life balance according to their needs.Legislative interventions that promote gender equality and the right of mothers to return to work (e.g., paternity leave) are in the right direction.However, more steps are needed for women's emancipation, aiming to change deeply entrenched social perceptions and attitudes about gender roles, from which even women find it difficult to break free.

Summary and Implications
Reconciling employment with life outside of work, ranging from childcare and housework to leisure and self-development, has been shown to have a tremendous impact on women's quality of life.After-work experiences may be considered as a resilience mechanism that helps employees cope with workplace adversity.Particularly for women employees, who are more vulnerable to stress-inducing situations and susceptible to risk factors such as underpaid work and "second shift" due to gender inequalities, it is significant to explore what kinds of after-work experiences and coping strategies help them recover and bounce back.This study aimed to explore what kinds of coping strategies and after-work experiences contribute to women's quality of life by improving their work-=life balance.For this purpose, a survey research was conducted involving 654 women employees working in private and public organizations in the Attica prefecture of Greece.The majority were married and had at least one dependent child.
The empowerment of women is also reflected in our research on the positive relationship between work-life balance and coping strategies.Balance between work and family life increases by taking action (problem-solving coping strategies) instead of avoiding dealing with difficulties.Therefore, women employees need to be supported to seek effective after-work experiences and adopt positive coping mechanisms that will boost their resilience and help them to ensure a better quality of life by achieving a better work-life balance.Policymakers in public and private sector organizations, companies, institution, etc., should elaborate more on establishing policies, arrangements, and programs that will provide practical and psychological support to women in their effort to effectively balance their parental and work roles.This is particularly critical irrespective of the national context given that recent crises that have a global impact, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, seem to have a disproportionate adverse impact on all aspects of women's quality of life (working conditions, living conditions, economic difficulties, job insecurity, etc.) [98][99][100][101].In such times that the standards of living and working conditions are adversely affected, safeguarding women's quality of life becomes crucial.In this context, this study contributes to the WLB literature by stressing the mediating role of balance in the relationship between resilience strategies (after-work experiences and coping strategies) and the quality of life of women employees (e.g., [12,35,67]).

Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
The current study has some limitations.First, the study focused exclusively on the Attica prefecture; thereafter, findings may not be generalizable to women in other geographic contexts in Greece (e.g., smaller urban or rural areas).Generalizability is also limited by the nonprobability sampling methodology used and the fact that participation was voluntary.Regarding measurement, the study utilized a set of predetermined coping strategies and after-work experiences to assess resilience mechanisms, excluding other potential dimensions that may contribute to individuals' quality of life, such as emotional regulation, time management, mindfulness, and emotional expression.Finally, the study solely examined women's experiences, excluding men or other gender identities; it does not explore potential gender-related interactions.
Concerning future research, it would be interesting to explore how workplace policies (paid parental leaves, flexible work arrangements, remote and part-time working, childcare support, eldercare assistance, etc.), support mechanisms, and networks (e.g., supervisor, peer, and team support) affect the development of resilience and coping and their subsequent impact on quality of life.The effect of resilience-building strategies on workplace outcomes, such as job satisfaction, contextual and noncontextual performance, and career trajectories, would also be providing valuable practical insights for managers

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic representation of the conceptual framework.Figure 1.Schematic representation of the conceptual framework.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Schematic representation of the conceptual framework.Figure 1.Schematic representation of the conceptual framework.

Table 1 .
Questionnaire constructs: reliability and descriptive statistics.

Table 2 .
Correlations and square root of AVE.Bold numbers in the diagonal row are square root of AVE.

Table 4 .
Overall fit of structural models.

Table 4 .
Overall fit of structural models.