Geosites Inventory in Liguria Region (Northern Italy): A Tool for Regional Geoconservation and Environmental Management

: The Liguria Region in Northern Italy is characterized by a wide geological and geomorphological variety, encompassing an important and valuable geoheritage. The Ligurian regional law (L.R. 39/2009) protects and enhances geodiversity and geosites, establishing the Regional Inventory of Geosites; however, an approved ofﬁcial inventory is still lacking. In this work, a ﬁrst reasoned inventory of 120 geosites is proposed for the Liguria Region on the basis of ﬁeld surveys and literature review. A quantitative assessment of the value and the degradation risk of geosites has been carried out: the value assessment takes into account scientiﬁc, additional and potential-for-use values; the degradation risk assessment considers geosites’ fragility and vulnerability. The results, providing knowledge on the Ligurian geoheritage, can serve as the basis for the Regional Inventory of Geosites and can be useful tools for the implementation of any regional geoconservation strategy or environmental management plan. scientiﬁc interests, representativeness and spatial distribution; (ii) quantitative assessment of geosites; (iii) geosites’


Introduction
Geodiversity, geoheritage and geosite studies have seen growing relevance in recent times, e.g., [1][2][3][4] and reference therein. Geodiversity, defined as the diversity within abiotic nature [5,6], is an important resource that can help the economic growth of a territory, for example, through the promotion of geotourism [7]. Geoheritage includes sites or areas, i.e., geosites, worthy of being protected and transmitted to future generations due to their special role in the reconstruction of Earth's history. The systematic collection and management of information about geodiversity and geoheritage of an area is a fundamental activity for the development of effective protection, conservation and enhancement strategies [1,8].
The definition of geosites and the inseparable issue of their value have been much debated within the scientific community [37,38] and references therein. The prevalent approach defines geosites as in situ geodiversity elements that have a certain value due to human perception and exploitation. According to this broad definition, the attributes that may confer value to geosite are scientific, scenic, socioeconomic, cultural, educational, the potential-for-use value. A more restrictive definition has been proposed by Brilha [8], according to which geosites are in situ elements with high scientific value. The Ligurian climate is of the Mediterranean type, with several microclimates. According to the classification by Köppen [52], the coastal strip has a hot temperate climate, the southern side of the Alpine-Apennine mountain chain has a sub-coastal temperate climate, and the northern side has a subcontinental temperate climate [53]. The mountain areas higher than 1000 m a.s.l. are classified in the cool temperate climate.
The geological setting of the Liguria Region is complex, this region being the knot between two different orogenic systems: Alps and Apennines [54]. Three principal groups of tectonic units can be found, belonging to different palaeogeographic domains: the Palaeo-European continental units (Dauphinois-Provençal domain, Briançonnais domain and Pre-Piedmont domain), the oceanic units (Ligurian and Ligurian-Piedmont domains) and the Palaeo-African or Adriatic continental units (Tuscan domain) [55]. In the western part of the region, the tectonic units are affected by alpine HP-LT metamorphism, peaking The Ligurian climate is of the Mediterranean type, with several microclimates. According to the classification by Köppen [52], the coastal strip has a hot temperate climate, the southern side of the Alpine-Apennine mountain chain has a sub-coastal temperate climate, and the northern side has a subcontinental temperate climate [53]. The mountain areas higher than 1000 m a.s.l. are classified in the cool temperate climate.
The geological setting of the Liguria Region is complex, this region being the knot between two different orogenic systems: Alps and Apennines [54]. Three principal groups of tectonic units can be found, belonging to different palaeogeographic domains: the Palaeo-European continental units (Dauphinois-Provençal domain, Briançonnais domain and Pre-Piedmont domain), the oceanic units (Ligurian and Ligurian-Piedmont domains) and the Palaeo-African or Adriatic continental units (Tuscan domain) [55]. In the western part of the region, the tectonic units are affected by alpine HP-LT metamorphism, peaking in blue-schist or eclogite facies. The eastern units are non-metamorphic or affected by very low-grade metamorphism. A fault system named the Sestri-Voltaggio Line marks the separation between metamorphic and non-metamorphic units, and because of this, it has long been considered the Alps-Apennines boundary. Now there is scientific consensus that the Alps-Apennines junction occurs within a wide area, corresponding with the central Liguria Region, where the two orogenic systems have interfered [56,57]. In general, marly limestone flysch is the most abundant lithology, outcropping from Ventimiglia to Albenga and from Genoa to Chiavari. Sandstone flysch outcrops in the Vara valley and near Ventimiglia. Metamorphic ophiolites are found in the central part of the region, from Savona to Genoa (Voltri Massif), while non-metamorphic ophiolites outcrop in various places of the Ligurian Apennines, both as complete ophiolitic sequences and as blocks within sedimentary mélanges. Sandstones and conglomerates occur in the Scrivia, Orba and Bormida valleys and in Portofino. Limestones and dolomites are found mostly in western Liguria: in the Savona province and at the border between Liguria and France; in eastern Liguria, an important limestone outcrop is located around the city of La Spezia. Gneiss and amphibolites outcrop in the Province of Savona, forming the so-called Savona and Calizzano Massifs (Figure 2). tary mélanges. Sandstones and conglomerates occur in the Scrivia, Orba and Bormida valleys and in Portofino. Limestones and dolomites are found mostly in western Liguria: in the Savona province and at the border between Liguria and France; in eastern Liguria, an important limestone outcrop is located around the city of La Spezia. Gneiss and amphibolites outcrop in the Province of Savona, forming the so-called Savona and Calizzano Massifs ( Figure 2). The main tectonic lineations influence the hydrographic network: most watercourses show directions perpendicular or parallel to the main watershed [58]. Many watercourses show signs of recent tectonic activity, such as fluvial captures, entrenched meanders (Figure 3a). The main rivers form small flood plains next to their outlet, the most important being the Albenga plain (Centa River) in the west and the Magra plain in the east.
In the Region, as many as 13,500 landslides have been cataloged [59]. The most frequent landslides are complex landslides, translational and rotational slides. Deep-seated gravitational deformations (DSGD; Figure 3b) and related landforms are widespread, especially in the eastern Ligurian Apennines [60]. The main limestone and dolomite outcrops are characterized by karst landforms; the most important karst areas lie in the Savona Province, where the main cave complexes are located (Mt. Carmo, Finale Ligure; Figure 3c) [61]. Many mountain areas, like the Beigua massif and the Trebbia and Aveto valleys, show signs of periglacial processes, such as blockfields and block streams ( Figure  3d), wetlands, ponds and small lakes [62]. Poorly conserved relict glacial cirques can be The main tectonic lineations influence the hydrographic network: most watercourses show directions perpendicular or parallel to the main watershed [58]. Many watercourses show signs of recent tectonic activity, such as fluvial captures, entrenched meanders ( Figure 3a). The main rivers form small flood plains next to their outlet, the most important being the Albenga plain (Centa River) in the west and the Magra plain in the east. observed in the Mt. Saccarello massif. The Ligurian coast is 350 km long and is mostly rocky, alternating promontories with high cliffs ( Figure 3e) and bays with pocket beaches [63,64]. The small coastal plains are characterized by sandy beaches. By the main cities, long coastal sectors have been completely modified by human actions [65]. In the entire regional territory, anthropogenic landforms are frequent: urban areas, ports, airports, mines, quarries (Figure 3f), dumps, etc. The most widespread anthropic landforms in the inland are stone wall terraces, built for agricultural purposes [66].

Materials and Methods
In order to fulfill the needs and requirements of effective conservation and governance strategies of the geoheritage of a region, the systematic collection and management of information about the geosites are considered a crucial step [8].
In the scientific literature of geoheritage, a number of methodologies for geosites inventory, e.g., [15,[67][68][69] and assessment, e.g., [8,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81], with a great variety of purposes In the Region, as many as 13,500 landslides have been cataloged [59]. The most frequent landslides are complex landslides, translational and rotational slides. Deep-seated gravitational deformations (DSGD; Figure 3b) and related landforms are widespread, especially in the eastern Ligurian Apennines [60]. The main limestone and dolomite outcrops are characterized by karst landforms; the most important karst areas lie in the Savona Province, where the main cave complexes are located (Mt. Carmo, Finale Ligure; Figure 3c) [61]. Many mountain areas, like the Beigua massif and the Trebbia and Aveto valleys, show signs of periglacial processes, such as blockfields and block streams (Figure 3d), wetlands, ponds and small lakes [62]. Poorly conserved relict glacial cirques can be observed in the Mt. Saccarello massif. The Ligurian coast is 350 km long and is mostly rocky, alternating promontories with high cliffs (Figure 3e) and bays with pocket beaches [63,64]. The small coastal plains are characterized by sandy beaches. By the main cities, long coastal sectors have been completely modified by human actions [65]. In the entire regional territory, anthropogenic landforms are frequent: urban areas, ports, airports, mines, quarries (Figure 3f), dumps, etc. The most widespread anthropic landforms in the inland are stone wall terraces, built for agricultural purposes [66].

Materials and Methods
In order to fulfill the needs and requirements of effective conservation and governance strategies of the geoheritage of a region, the systematic collection and management of information about the geosites are considered a crucial step [8].
Based on these premises, a research program for the Ligurian geosites inventory and assessment of their value and degradation risk has been developed. The methodological approach adopted comprises the following operational phases ( Figure 4): (i) recognition and selection of geosites based on three criteria: scientific interests, representativeness and spatial distribution; (ii) quantitative assessment of geosites; (iii) geosites' degradation risk assessment.

Recognition and Selection of Geosites
The recognition and selection of geosites in the Liguria Region have followed three methodological steps ( Figure 4): (i) literature review and field surveys; (ii) compilation of a list of "potential geosites"; (iii) selection of the most interesting sites (i.e., geosites), that make up the final inventory.
The first phase took advantage of numerous works concerning the geology and geomorphology of the region and previous scientific and technical reports about geosites carried out by the Liguria Region, e.g., [51,82] and references therein and by Ligurian provinces, municipalities and natural parks [13,49,83]. Collecting all the data of previous field surveying and literature review, a database of "potential geosites" was compiled. From this large database, on the basis of the three following criteria, sites were selected to form the inventory of geosites: • Scientific interests: the selected geosites must be well distributed by primary and sec-

Recognition and Selection of Geosites
The recognition and selection of geosites in the Liguria Region have followed three methodological steps ( Figure 4): (i) literature review and field surveys; (ii) compilation of a list of "potential geosites"; (iii) selection of the most interesting sites (i.e., geosites), that make up the final inventory.
The first phase took advantage of numerous works concerning the geology and geomorphology of the region and previous scientific and technical reports about geosites carried out by the Liguria Region, e.g., [51,82] and references therein and by Ligurian provinces, municipalities and natural parks [13,49,83]. Collecting all the data of previous field surveying and literature review, a database of "potential geosites" was compiled. From this large database, on the basis of the three following criteria, sites were selected to form the inventory of geosites: • Scientific interests: the selected geosites must be well distributed by primary and secondary scientific interests in order to represent the wide diversity of the geological and geomorphological features of the region. Geosites with multiple interests were privileged; • Representativeness: the selected geosites must have good representativeness of a geological and/or geomorphological process; • Geographical distribution: given the aforementioned criteria, an attempt was made to give a good geographical distribution of the chosen geosites in order to range throughout the entire regional territory without overrepresenting some areas and underrepresenting others.
Detailed field surveys were performed in order to collect site-specific updated data relevant for the completion of the inventory's descriptive cards according to the guidelines by ISPRA for the inclusion of the sites in the Italian National Inventory [48].

Quantitative Assessment of Geosites
Quantitative assessment numerically evaluates the values of geosites through indicators, reducing the inevitable subjectivity associated with any evaluation procedure and making the results comparable. Since the pioneering methods developed in Europe in the late 1990 , a number of methods were published for nearly 30 years, but as of now, there is no generally accepted method cf. [37,38] and references therein. Many quantitative methods are based on sets of parameters and indicators that generally refer to different values of the geosites: (i) the scientific value; (ii) the additional value (ii) the potential-foruse. A score is given to each parameter, and then the individual scores are combined to obtain a final score, or Q value [70,84]. Other methods do not calculate a final score but separately consider each set of parameters because the criteria considered are independent of each other and because the independent numerical evaluation of each criterion enables the individual analysis of each geosite.
In the present study, the selected geosites were quantitatively assessed by applying a methodology that was specifically set up on the basis of previous works [8,12,13,15,85].
The geosite value assessment is based on the following value, and corresponding criteria were set up (Tables 1-3): (i) scientific value; (ii) additional value; (iii) potential-foruse value.

No secondary interests
One secondary interest of poor relevance One or more secondary interests of fair relevance One or more secondary interests of good relevance One or more secondary interests of great relevance  The scientific value is based on the four criteria: integrity (INT), representativeness (REP), rareness (RAR) and secondary interests (SEC). The additional value takes into account the esthetical (EST) and cultural (CULT) values. The potential-for-use is based on accessibility (ACC) and interpretative potential (PIN).
The esthetic value is the most subjective one, as it depends on the individual sensibility and preference of researchers and visitors. In the scientific literature, there has been extensive discussion on esthetic judgment [86] and references therein, and some methodologies have been set up to define the criteria for a quantitative esthetic value assessment, e.g., [84,[87][88][89]. In this work, four criteria (naturalness, panoramic quality, color diversity and vertical development) were considered to assess the esthetic value, according to Reynard et al. [84] and Coratza et al. [89].
A score between 1 and 5 was attributed to each parameter, then the total scientific/ additional/potential-for-use value is the average of each set of parameters. The Q value was then calculated with the weighted average of the three total values, as shown in Equation (1).
where Sv is the scientific value, Av is the additional value, and Pu is the potential-for-use.

Degradation Risk Assessment of Geosites
According to [90][91][92][93], the risk of degradation is the probability of a geosite being damaged or destroyed, i.e., losing any of the features that make it valuable as a geosite. It follows that assessment of geosites degradation risk assessment is of paramount importance in any geoconservation strategy, especially in setting an effective plan for the correct management and enhancement of geosites. The inclusion of degradation risk aspects in geoheritage, especially its assessment, is a relatively recent initiative. Despite some methods for the quantitative assessment of the degradation risk are described in the literature ( [38] and references therein); however, a standard methodology that supports the recognition and prevention of threats affecting geosites is still missing.
In the present study, a first tentative methodology is proposed to evaluate the degradation risk for the Ligurian geosites. This methodology is based on the definitions of Fuertes-Gutiérrez and Fernández-Martínez [67,93], according to which the degradation risk is given by the combination of fragility-defined as the "degradation risk under present natural conditions, i.e., without the intervention of Man" [93] (p. 1) and vulnerability -defined as the "risk of destruction due to human activity [93] (p. 61). The fragility depends on the intrinsic characteristics of the geosite (e.g., type of geosite, extension, rock mass strength) and on its sensitivity to the action of natural processes (e.g., erosion, the intensity of erosive agents, slope stability). It is important to note that, in many cases, the same morphogenetic process that gave rise to a geosite is also an important risk factor for natural degradation. Vulnerability depends on numerous factors [38], such as the population density of the area surrounding the geosite, the difficulty of access, the presence of access controls or restrictions, protected areas or other territorial constraints, the proximity to anthropogenic elements that can cause degradation (mining activities, urban areas, industrial areas, etc.).
The methodology developed and applied in this study for the degradation risk assessment (Table 4) is based on the following three criteria: (i) fragility due to the same natural processes that created the geosite (Fa); (ii) fragility due to other natural processes (Fb); (iii) vulnerability due to anthropic actions (V). For each criterion, a score was given between 1 and 4. The total score was calculated with the weighted average of the three criteria. The heavier weight was assigned to V because from a management perspective; it is easier to intervene in anthropogenic actions. It was decided to assign a lower weight to Fa than to Fb. The condition described for Fa is common in geomorphosites, in which the same process that has shaped the site slowly leads to its degradation or destruction. In these cases, the interest in the geosite is due more to the morphogenetic process itself than to the resulting landform.

Recognition and Selection of Geosites
Collecting all the data of previous works, field surveying and literature review, a database of 520 "potential geosites" was compiled. From this large database, 120 sites were selected to form the inventory of geosites (Table S1A, Figure 5a) and the data collected were stored in a GIS database. The most represented category (Figure 5c) is that of geosites of geomorphological interest, which make up about half of the inventory (61), then there are geosites of geological latu sensu (s.l.) interest (14), engineering geology (12), structural geology (10), mineropetrographic (10), stratigraphic (7), paleontological (4), pedological (3) and hydrogeological interest (2).
Among geomorphosites, there is a good distribution between the principal morphogenetic processes that are or have been active in the Liguria Region (Figure 5d).

Quantitative Assessment of Geosites
The selected geosites were evaluated considering their scientific, additional and potential-for-use value. The scores associated with each of these values were combined to The inventoried geosites were classified according to their typology [93][94][95] and references therein (Figure 5b). Following the national guidelines by ISPRA, three typologies were considered: areal, linear and point geosites. Ninety-four geosites were classified as areal (78.3%), 18 sites as point geosites (15%) and 8 sites as linear (6.7%). Most sites are areal due to the survey scale (1:10.000). There are many different types of areal geosites: cliffs, karst plateaus, sinkholes, lakes, mines, quarries, landslides, rock outcrops, etc. Point geosites are mainly: sites with underground development (caves and mines); springs, isolated spires; pedological sites. Linear geosites are of two main types: fluvial geomorphosites (e.g., gorges) or stratigraphic sequences, usually outcropping in road cuts.
Regarding the main scientific interest, 9 different main interests were identified: geology s.l., engineering geology, structural geology, geomorphology, hydrogeology, paleontology, pedology, petrography-mineralogy and stratigraphy. The "geology s.l." category includes geosites of geological interest in a broad sense, in which relevant aspects of regional, structural and stratigraphic geology coexist.
Among geomorphosites, there is a good distribution between the principal morphogenetic processes that are or have been active in the Liguria Region (Figure 5d).

Quantitative Assessment of Geosites
The selected geosites were evaluated considering their scientific, additional and potential-for-use value. The scores associated with each of these values were combined to obtain a total score (Q value) (Table S1B). In Figure 6, geosites are divided into six Q classes. Class 4 is the most represented, containing 34 geosites. In class 6, representing the highest Q value, there are 9 geosites. The lowest score class (class 1) is the least abundant, with only 5 geosites.   Figure 7 shows the multivariate representation of the scores assigned in the value assessment. By observing the forms assumed by the diagrams, it is possible to make a quick comparison between the different geosites and identify those that have similar characteristics. The geosites were grouped on the basis of primary interest, which in the diagrams are shown in different colors.  Figure 7 shows the multivariate representation of the scores assigned in the value assessment. By observing the forms assumed by the diagrams, it is possible to make a quick comparison between the different geosites and identify those that have similar characteristics. The geosites were grouped on the basis of primary interest, which in the diagrams are shown in different colors.
In general, regardless of the type and main scientific interest, the geosites assessed show high integrity and medium to high representativeness. There are 12 geosites rare on a national scale and 73 rare on a regional scale. The scores assigned to the secondary interests are high as this parameter was taken into account in the first selection to set up the inventory of geosites.
The multivariate representation ( Figure S1a) can be useful for identifying similarities between geosites with the same primary interest. The most represented categories (geology s.l. and geomorphology) have rather variable diagrams. The diagrams concerning geosites of engineering geology often have a round shape due to the fact that no parameters take on particularly low scores. Geosites of hydrogeological interest show average scientific value, rather low esthetic and cultural values, but high potential-for-use. The geosites of paleontological interest have a high or medium-high scientific value, medium-high use potential, medium-high esthetic value but low cultural value. The geosites of pedological interest show a similar situation, with medium-high scientific value and low additional and potential-for-use values. A similar situation occurs for geosites of petrographical interest.  Figure 7 shows the multivariate representation of the scores assigned in the value assessment. By observing the forms assumed by the diagrams, it is possible to make a quick comparison between the different geosites and identify those that have similar characteristics. The geosites were grouped on the basis of primary interest, which in the diagrams are shown in different colors. In general, regardless of the type and main scientific interest, the geosites assessed show high integrity and medium to high representativeness. There are 12 geosites rare on a national scale and 73 rare on a regional scale. The scores assigned to the secondary interests are high as this parameter was taken into account in the first selection to set up the inventory of geosites.
The multivariate representation ( Figure S1a) can be useful for identifying similarities between geosites with the same primary interest. The most represented categories (geology s.l. and geomorphology) have rather variable diagrams. The diagrams concerning geosites of engineering geology often have a round shape due to the fact that no parameters take on particularly low scores. Geosites of hydrogeological interest show average scientific value, rather low esthetic and cultural values, but high potential-for-use. The geosites of paleontological interest have a high or medium-high scientific value, medium-high use potential, medium-high esthetic value but low cultural value. The geosites of pedological

Degradation Risk Assessment of Geosites
The degradation risk of geosites was evaluated considering three parameters concerning geosites fragility and vulnerability. The scores associated with each of these values were combined to obtain a total score (Table S1C).
In Figure 8, the total values were divided into four classes (low, medium, moderate and high degradation risk). Most geosites (61) are located in class 2, corresponding to a medium degradation risk. Only 7 geosites show low vulnerability; 40 geosites are of medium vulnerability, as many as 59 geosites (about half of the total) are of moderate vulnerability, and 14 geosites are highly vulnerable. interest show a similar situation, with medium-high scientific value and low additional and potential-for-use values. A similar situation occurs for geosites of petrographical interest.

Degradation Risk Assessment of Geosites
The degradation risk of geosites was evaluated considering three parameters concerning geosites fragility and vulnerability. The scores associated with each of these values were combined to obtain a total score (Table S1C).
In Figure 8, the total values were divided into four classes (low, medium, moderate and high degradation risk). Most geosites (61) are located in class 2, corresponding to a medium degradation risk. Only 7 geosites show low vulnerability; 40 geosites are of medium vulnerability, as many as 59 geosites (about half of the total) are of moderate vulnerability, and 14 geosites are highly vulnerable.
The parameter Fa, linked to the intrinsic fragility of the geosite and to the natural processes that shaped it, tends to be relatively high only for geomorphosites or for sites with strong geomorphological connotations.
The multivariate representation shows the scores assigned to the parameters of the degradation risk assessment ( Figure S1b). The aforementioned differences can be seen: the diagrams concerning geosites of geomorphological interest assume rather variable forms; to a lesser extent, the variability is also present in geosites with primary geological s.l. structural and engineering geology interests. The diagrams relating to geosites of pedological, petrographic and paleontological interest have shapes very similar to a flattened triangle due to the fact that Fa assumes the minimum score, while Fb and V assume medium-high values.

Discussion
This research carried out through field surveys, and the review of scientific literature and technical reports has shown the great number of geosites in the Liguria Region, which reflect its particular geographical, geological and geomorphological features.
It is no coincidence that Liguria hosts one of the most active UNESCO Global Geoparks (Beigua Geopark), and the main regional protected areas have Earth Science features as the main point of interest: ophiolites in the case of the Beigua and Aveto natural parks; conglomerates and coastal landforms in the Portofino park; flysch and limestones The parameter Fa, linked to the intrinsic fragility of the geosite and to the natural processes that shaped it, tends to be relatively high only for geomorphosites or for sites with strong geomorphological connotations.
The multivariate representation shows the scores assigned to the parameters of the degradation risk assessment ( Figure S1b). The aforementioned differences can be seen: the diagrams concerning geosites of geomorphological interest assume rather variable forms; to a lesser extent, the variability is also present in geosites with primary geological s.l. structural and engineering geology interests. The diagrams relating to geosites of pedological, petrographic and paleontological interest have shapes very similar to a flattened triangle due to the fact that Fa assumes the minimum score, while Fb and V assume medium-high values.

Discussion
This research carried out through field surveys, and the review of scientific literature and technical reports has shown the great number of geosites in the Liguria Region, which reflect its particular geographical, geological and geomorphological features.
It is no coincidence that Liguria hosts one of the most active UNESCO Global Geoparks (Beigua Geopark), and the main regional protected areas have Earth Science features as the main point of interest: ophiolites in the case of the Beigua and Aveto natural parks; conglomerates and coastal landforms in the Portofino park; flysch and limestones in the Alpi Liguri park; flysch and conglomerates in the Antola park. Some other protected areas were established to protect and promote sites of significant geological interest: Tana dell'Orpe cave in the Bric Tana natural park, the "mushroom", and the badlands in the Piana Crixia natural park; the fossils of Rio Torsero natural park.
There is a correspondence between areas with a high concentration of geosites and the main protected areas of Liguria (Figure 5a). Especially the natural parks of the Ligurian Alps, Beigua, Aveto and Portovenere show a high concentration of geosites. The Beigua Natural Park, part of the UNESCO Global Geopark Network, hosts by far the largest number of geosites among the Ligurian parks (8 in the natural park area, 16 in the entire geopark area). The only area with a high concentration of geosites that does not correspond to a park area is the territory of Finale Ligure (SV). The project to make it a natural park, born in the 1980s and also promoted by the reorganization of regional protected areas in 1995, never took off and is still under debate.
The quantitative value assessment has shown that the inventoried geosites have a generally high Q, varying from 2.90 to 4.33. The nine geosites with the highest Q ( Figure 9) are among the best-known geosites of the Liguria Region. All of them are already exploited for tourism: the Gambatesa Mine has become a mining museum, and most of the other geosites are reached by well-known hiking trails.
The highest esthetic value is obtained by imposing features on the landscape, i.e., cliffs, pinnacles, islands, etc.: some of the best known are the aforementioned Palmaria and Tino Islands, the Portovenere cliffs, the Castell'Ermo dolomitic towers. High cultural value can be due to historical importance (Castello della Pietra) or archaeological importance (Balzi Rossi caves, Arma delle Manie). The latter geosites show important links between the archaeological and geological-geomorphological features and can therefore be considered archaeogeosites sensu [31].
The risk of degradation associated with a geosite is another index of paramount importance, which must be taken into account in the preparation and implementation of a management plan [38]. The assessment of the degradation risk was performed with a quantitative method that considered three parameters: fragility due to the natural processes that generated the geosite, fragility linked to natural processes not connected with the geosite's genesis, and vulnerability to anthropic impact. The final score was calculated with the weighted average of these three parameters.
In general, the total degradation risk of the geosites is on average (51% of the inventory) or moderate (36%) values. One geosite, the Libiola Mine, falls into a high-risk category. The Libiola Mine is an abandoned copper mine, known for its environmental problems due to acid mine drainage processes [96,97].
There is a connection between the degradation risk and the dimensions of a geosite, e.g., [93][94][95]. Figure 10 shows the number of points, linear and areal geosites per class of degradation risk. The count of geosites by type is expressed as a percentage in order to

Conclusions
This research has led to the identification of 120 geosites in the Liguria region (N ern Italy), whose value and degradation risk was quantitatively assessed. The quantit value assessment allows pinpointing the most suitable sites for geotourism promo the most important geosites from a scientific, esthetic or cultural point of view. The radation risk assessment carried out for the first time in Liguria has shown the more ile and vulnerable geosites, supporting the regional administration concerning whic oconservation and management actions should be implemented.

Conclusions
This research has led to the identification of 120 geosites in the Liguria region (Northern Italy), whose value and degradation risk was quantitatively assessed. The quantitative value assessment allows pinpointing the most suitable sites for geotourism promotion, the most important geosites from a scientific, esthetic or cultural point of view. The degradation risk assessment carried out for the first time in Liguria has shown the more fragile and vulnerable geosites, supporting the regional administration concerning which geoconservation and management actions should be implemented. The results obtained in this study are in line with the results of research carried out in different Italian regions for the geosites inventory (e.g., Friuli Venezia Giulia [98], Emilia-Romagna [99], Puglia [100] that testify the great Italian geodiversity and the great abundance of geomorphosites.

Conclusions
This research has led to the identification of 120 geosites in the Liguria region (Northern Italy), whose value and degradation risk was quantitatively assessed. The quantitative value assessment allows pinpointing the most suitable sites for geotourism promotion, the most important geosites from a scientific, esthetic or cultural point of view. The degradation risk assessment carried out for the first time in Liguria has shown the more fragile and vulnerable geosites, supporting the regional administration concerning which geoconservation and management actions should be implemented.
Tourism plays a major role in the Ligurian economy: accommodation facilities have recorded an average of 15 million attendances per year in the last five years [101]. However, tourism and recreational activities focus mainly on the seaside (78.4% of tourists) and on cultural heritage (e.g., historical cities and towns; 75.7%). Only in recent years, the Ligurian geoheritage has seen growing attention, with the institution of the Beigua Geopark, the Gambatesa and Masso mining museums and geoscience-related activities being undertaken in other protected areas.
This research demonstrates that, despite its small geographical scale, the Liguria region is characterized by a rich and valuable geoheritage. Geosite evaluation provides useful information, allowing for effective management strategies and geotourism enhancement. Geological and geomorphological features can be relevant in developing slow and sustainable tourism fruition, thanks to a better understanding of geological and geomorphological context and processes. The connection of geoheritage features with landscape and cultural (i.e., artistic, historical, archaeological, etc.) features should lead to the creation of a network of thematic routes, stimulating tourists to discover lesser-known areas of great interest, thus diminishing anthropic pressure on very crowded coastal areas. Geotourism, therefore, represents an important tool that can lead to significant economic benefits.
The occurrence of many different processes, landforms and landscapes in a small space and the high-density of the population make Liguria a fragile and vulnerable region. Because of this, the evaluation of the degradation risk, carried for the first time on Ligurian geosites, provides fundamental information for environmental management planning and geoconservation. Geosites' conservation is a complex issue that should take into account both natural active processes and anthropic action. Fragility evaluation helps to individuate active geosites: dynamic sites, susceptible to changes depending on the intensity, the speed and the frequency of the process that shaped them. Landforms and processes may be monitored by means of photographic and topographic surveys, shedding light on the evolution of active geosites. In some cases, active processes represent actual threats to visitors (e.g., rock falls from a cliff), requiring more complex intervention to reduce the risk factors.
Vulnerability evaluation helps to pinpoint the most susceptible sites to human action. While actions against natural processes are often very difficult or even useless, anthropic pressure is easier to control. In this respect, it can be useful to monitor public affluence to vulnerable sites, to identify any impact on their integrity and consequently take action. Geosites' size plays a major role in this case, with small sites (e.g., point geosites) being able to stand lower anthropic pressure than large areal sites.
From the 1990s onwards, numerous studies and reports about geosites in the Liguria region have been carried out, e.g., [13,[49][50][51], sometimes only in limited portions of the regional territory. Despite the great abundance of data to start from, however, many of these studies did not follow a systematic and common inventory methodology neither a quantitative assessment method. This has led to a delay in the definition of a Regional inventory of geosites, which to date has not been approved yet by the regional and national authorities. This study, whose methodological approach was shared with the Regional authority and with ISPRA, which manages the national inventory, also has allowed systematizing and purifying all the data and reports from previous activities, completing, where necessary, the accompanying documentation.
The results of this research will serve as the basis for the approval of the Regional Inventory of Geosites and, after appropriate reviews, for the update of the National Inventory of Geosites managed by ISPRA. Moreover, the data collected will provide the necessary knowledge for decision-makers to guide actions regarding (i) effective conservation of the rich regional geological heritage through its inclusion in territorial planning strategies; (ii) inclusion of selected geosites in geotourism and educational activities, using geological contexts or peculiarities as key elements to develop safe and eco-compatible tourism also in less-familiar areas.