Ecosystem-Based MSP for Enhanced Fisheries Sustainability: An Example from the Northern Adriatic (Chioggia—Venice and Rovigo, Italy)

: Human pressures on marine ecosystems signiﬁcantly increased during last decades. Among the intense anthropic activities, industrial ﬁsheries have caused the alteration of habitats, the reduction of biodiversity and the main ﬁsh stocks. The aim of this research, carried out in the Adriatic Sea, was to test a repeatable Marine Spatial Planning framework aimed at enhancing ﬁsheries sustainability through the application of Decision Support Tools and the composition of a catalog of possible measures. The use of these tools proved very useful to identify possible criticalities and facilitate an effective exchange with ﬁsheries stakeholders, local authorities, and ﬁshermen, whose involvement was an indispensable step in the process. Tool-based analyses allowed to assess the spatial footprint of a range of anthropogenic pressures from human activities (e.g., ﬁsheries, maritime trafﬁc, and aquaculture). Within this multi-pressure scenario, special attention was paid to ﬁshing-related disturbances and potential conﬂicts across different ﬁshing m é tier and with other sectors. Speciﬁcally, results highlighted the spatial features of the major ﬁshing pressures (e.g., abrasion from trawling) affecting essential ﬁsh habitats, marine mammals and turtles in the study area. A portfolio of possible management measures is identiﬁed for the study area. It provides clear evidence that, in order to mitigate emerging conﬂicts and cumulative impacts, it is necessary to combine and integrate different types of measures: spatial measures modulated over time, monitoring and control, actions to ﬁll knowledge gaps, concertation—involvement—co-management actions, improvement of governance systems, actions to support innovation in the sector, etc. Given the complex set of measures discussed, this work can provide a useful contribution to the management of ﬁsheries both at local and regional level, fostering the transition to sustainable ﬁsheries.


Introduction
The Mediterranean Sea has been a vital source of food for human communities for centuries. During the last decades, however, the seas have experienced a significant increase in seafood demand at global scale, while the technological progress have enabled rapid industrialization of the fishing sector [1], leading to the overexploitation of fish stocks and long-term changes in coastal and marine ecosystems [2,3]. Indeed, fishing is one of the main sources of ecological disturbance [4] in the marine environment. Its geographical spread, intensity, historical, and current persistence make it one of the most relevant causes Sustainability 2021, 13, 1211 2 of 28 of biodiversity loss worldwide [5]. The extent of the cumulative effects of fishing and other relevant sources of pressures (e.g., marine pollution, alien species invasion, acidification, climate change, etc.) induced the United Nations to include the preservation of the oceans as one of the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, "Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development" (UN- SDG 14). In the last decade, progress towards reaching fishing sustainability has been achieved in some areas such as the greater North Sea while in others, as in the case of the Mediterranean Sea, no substantial improvement has been recorded [6]. In particular, the Adriatic Sea represents an area of further concern, being this sea-basin the most exploited globally, at least considering benthic impacting gears [7], while still hosting rich biodiversity and several endemisms [8]. Fisheries affect and are affected by the natural, economic, and social environment on which they are based, and their management is inherently complex. In consequence, fisheries managers should address the impacts on the natural habitats, fish stocks, profitability of the fishing industry, together with sociocultural impacts on local communities, and political considerations [9].
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has promoted a range of positive measures to alleviate the pressure of fisheries, such as the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, the adoption of the ecosystem approach to both fisheries and aquaculture, as well as the Blue Growth Initiative. Although these measures are contributing to significant successes concerning fish protein supplies, it is also clear that the sustainability of fisheries can no longer be considered in isolation from the set of human activities sharing the marine resources and space. Therefore, to ensure long-term sustainability for all activities, it has become increasingly necessary to manage marine areas throughout proper marine spatial planning [10].
In Europe, fisheries policy is an exclusive competence of the European Union. The environmental dimension of fisheries-related measures has grown over time through the continuous revision of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and its alignment with other EU environmental pillars like the Birds and Habitats Directives, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, and the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The aim is to create a framework for ensuring high long term fishing yields while protecting marine ecosystems. However, the EU's CFP also gives Member States the possibility e to play an active role (through the so-called "regionalization"), by submitting joint recommendations as regards the fisheries conservation measures deemed necessary to achieve those environmental objectives. The management of fisheries in a context of increasing human activities, hence, requires e systematic assessment frameworks [11] in order to put in place effective and targeted measures and reach a sounder protection of coastal and marine ecosystems [12,13].
Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is being developed and implemented worldwide [14] and is conceived to spatially allocate and manage maritime human activities while maintaining marine ecosystems in good environmental status [15]. MSP is also designed to enhance existing management measures addressing the marine environment [16] through a proper Ecosystem Based management (EBM), that can be defined as "an interdisciplinary approach that balances ecological, social and governance principles at appropriate temporal and spatial scales in a distinct geographical area to achieve sustainable resource use" [17]. The inclusion of fisheries in the MSP process is gaining increasing attention and scientific consensus. However, MSP approaches have rarely been used for managing fisheries so far (i.e., within the Swedish Marine spatial plans for Gulf of Bothnia, Baltic Sea, and Skagerrak/Kattegat, 2019), and extensive and broad knowledge is still necessary for an effective integration of fisheries into MSP [18]. This may include quantitative knowledge on habitats, communities, and ecosystems functioning, the biology (e.g., life cycles, behavior, reproduction, interactions, and metabolism) of selected fish species at different life stages, together with frameworks and analytical approaches that allow the assessment of the spatial interactions between fisheries, other human activities, and ecosystem components [19][20][21][22]. Analytical approaches and decision support tools (DSTs) are diffusely used to synthesize the complex information in order to assist the decision-making process, with systematic and objective assessments of the relationships between human uses and environmental components [23,24]. The results from data models may strongly support fisheries management [25,26] and planning [27], i.e., identifying areas with the highest level of cumulative impact [28] and assessing how human activities interact, fostering strategic choices and highlighting management priorities [29].
The reliability of these outputs is however largely dependent on the available knowledge. In particular, the knowledge on the spatial distribution of fishing activities, and the related pressures to environmental components and fisheries resources can be scarce; this restricts the availability of accurate quantitative data at proper scales limiting the provision of spatially explicit knowledge for the MSP processes [18,30].
Technological improvements may reverse such condition. For instance, the spread adoption of reporting technologies and remote sensing systems, such as vessel monitoring system (VMS) and automatic identification system (AIS), are generating an overwhelming amount of reliable, spatio-temporal and geographically distributed data related to large-size vessels and their movements, which could enhance the maritime knowledge if analyzed and modeled [31][32][33][34].
The extraction of spatially-explicit information from these data, especially in connection with machine learning techniques, is thus a key element to offer operational authorities, policy-makers, and scientists a better picture of what is happening at sea [35][36][37]. Moreover, the use of these layers of information to feed DSTs provides a substantial opportunity for planners to develop long-term strategies and support sustainable growth in the maritime sectors as a whole [38][39][40].
In this context, this research aimed to test a complete and repeatable MSP assessment framework with a specific focus on fishing activities, fish resources and protected species and habitats. In line with the EBM approach, the assessment framework proposed in this research considers the analysis of a complex system of multiple anthropogenic pressures derived from the uses of the sea and the coast in the Chioggia compartment. The conflicts among the various uses of the sea space (including the different segments of fisheries) were evaluated and the ecological impact of sea uses on key environmental receptors (benthic ecosystems, cetaceans and marine turtles, spawning and nursery areas) were assessed. The assessment framework includes (i) the reconstruction of a complete knowledge framework for the case study area; (ii) the analysis of the interactions between fishing and other uses of the sea and the impacts on environmental components; (iii) the identification of the main issues to be addressed. The results from this analyses were used to identify a portfolio of management measures focused on fisheries, aimed at minimizing environmental impacts and enhancing synergies with other coastal and maritime uses. Particular focus was given to the support offered by the application of existing DSTs to the whole process. The whole process was also developed engaging fishermen and stakeholders through specific activities. Within the research, strictly connected to the ongoing elaboration of the maritime spatial plans in the Italian seas, we discussed the needs of complex measures scenarios in order to maintain/improve the fisheries system while reducing its pressures on habitats, species and ecosystem within the context of the overall system of human uses in the area.

Case Study: Environmental Features, Human Activities, Existing Environmental, and Resources Protection Measures
The Adriatic Sea is a semi-enclosed basin; its northernmost part is characterized, on the western side, by the presence of a system of deltas and lagoons (between the Rivers Po and Isonzo) which formed 6000 years ago, whereas the Eastern coast is high and rocky [41]. In the western area, the shallow depth (mean depth of 33.5 m) and the presence of incoherent sediments (muddy to sandy), make the Northern Adriatic Sea a vast trawlable area. Given the abundance of fisheries resources associated with the high productivity (triggered by the Po river discharge), there is a strong fishing tradition in this area [42]. The Northern Adriatic Sea is also characterized by the occurrence of species of high conservation interest, like the sea turtle Caretta caretta and the cetacean Tursiops truncatus. A few rocky outcrops (locally named tegnùe in the Venetian dialect) [43] with high biodiversity value and sensitivities are also present. The coastal areas, and the system of deltas and lagoons, are nursery areas with a relevant role for the essential fish habitat of several target species (e.g., red mullet, seabass, sea bream, and cuttlefish) [44].
The coastal city of Chioggia hosts the largest Italian fishing fleet and the fisheries resources (both benthic and pelagic stocks) are severely overexploited in the whole Adriatic Sea basin [45]. Aquaculture is also a relevant activity, with the presence of mussel farms along the Italian coastal area. The study area ( Figure 1) is close to the industrial site of Porto Marghera and the commercial port of Venice, which generate intense marine traffic. The city of Venice itself, and the coastal areas, are particularly relevant in terms of tourist activities, including marine yachting. The study area hosts two Natura 2000 sites, the "Tegnue di Chioggia" and the "Adriatico Settentrionale Veneto-Delta del Po". Other neighboring Natura 2000 sites were established to protect coastal lagoons and deltas. Typical measures established to limit fishing pressures include the permanent exclusion of bottom and pelagic trawling from the coast towards three nautical miles (according to the so-called Mediterranean Regulation, Reg. CE 1967/2006), and the establishment of a summer trawling fishing ban lasting around 45 days aimed at protecting recruits. incoherent sediments (muddy to sandy), make the Northern Adriatic Sea a vast trawlable area. Given the abundance of fisheries resources associated with the high productivity (triggered by the Po river discharge), there is a strong fishing tradition in this area [42]. The Northern Adriatic Sea is also characterized by the occurrence of species of high conservation interest, like the sea turtle Caretta caretta and the cetacean Tursiops truncatus. A few rocky outcrops (locally named tegnùe in the Venetian dialect) [43] with high biodiversity value and sensitivities are also present. The coastal areas, and the system of deltas and lagoons, are nursery areas with a relevant role for the essential fish habitat of several target species (e.g., red mullet, seabass, sea bream, and cuttlefish) [44]. The coastal city of Chioggia hosts the largest Italian fishing fleet and the fisheries resources (both benthic and pelagic stocks) are severely overexploited in the whole Adriatic Sea basin [45]. Aquaculture is also a relevant activity, with the presence of mussel farms along the Italian coastal area. The study area ( Figure 1) is close to the industrial site of Porto Marghera and the commercial port of Venice, which generate intense marine traffic. The city of Venice itself, and the coastal areas, are particularly relevant in terms of tourist activities, including marine yachting. The study area hosts two Natura 2000 sites, the "Tegnue di Chioggia" and the "Adriatico Settentrionale Veneto-Delta del Po". Other neighboring Natura 2000 sites were established to protect coastal lagoons and deltas. Typical measures established to limit fishing pressures include the permanent exclusion of bottom and pelagic trawling from the coast towards three nautical miles (according to the so-called Mediterranean Regulation, Reg. CE 1967/2006), and the establishment of a summer trawling fishing ban lasting around 45 days aimed at protecting recruits. Considering a broader scale, the Northern-Central Adriatic coastline hosts other major industrial ports and sites (e.g., Trieste, Ravenna, Ancona, Koper, and Rijeka), that along with touristic pressure (and fishing) makes the basin the most affected by cumulative human pressures in the Mediterranean Sea [46]. Considering a broader scale, the Northern-Central Adriatic coastline hosts other major industrial ports and sites (e.g., Trieste, Ravenna, Ancona, Koper, and Rijeka), that along with touristic pressure (and fishing) makes the basin the most affected by cumulative human pressures in the Mediterranean Sea [46]. AIS data at 5-min resolution were first filtered to identify vessels likely to be fishing within the study area at least once during 2015. After a preliminary data inspection, AIS data were processed as follow ( Figure 2):

AIS Data Processing
• Raw Data Cleaning: identifying and editing/deleting outliers, such as pings in land and/or far away from preceding and following transmissions; • Fishing trip identification: partitioning strings of consecutive AIS records for each unique Maritime Mobile Service Identity (MMSI) into individual trips, from the time vessels leave a port to the time they return to a port. An ad-hoc algorithm was developed in Matlab software to identify individual trips, requiring a number of nuanced steps to fix data issues, such as missing AIS transmissions in close proximity to ports and vessels steaming near the coast. Fishing trips were stored in the spatial database along with inherited geographical attributes (ports, countries, and GSAs of departure and landing) and additional trip metrics were computed such as duration and percentage of data gaps due either to intentional switch off by fishermen or transmission issues (i.e., in regions with high maritime traffic or missing terrestrial receivers along the coastlines). • Assignment of the fishing gear: a rule-based machine learning was used to characterize single trips and to identify the type of fishing, based on GPS values and profiles of speed and course and additional gear-specific movement patterns (e.g., duration of the fishing trip and operations, course values during the hauling, and time gap between subsequent hauls). A set of algorithms were developed using Matlab software environment to incorporate prior domain knowledge for different gear types and executed in sequence to label single trips according to predefined gear classes: bottom otter trawl, beam trawl, pelagic trawl, purse seine, longline, and "other" fishing (including nets and traps).

•
The algorithms were designed for each of the predefined gear classes and then a rule-based decision was taken to uniquely assign a gear type to each month on the basis of single answers (given by algorithms for each trip). Decisions were taken on a monthly basis and weighting only "stable" fishing trips that were more robustly classified, such as those with at least 30 transmissions and with a percentage of data gaps non-exceeding 90%. Given the above, the current rule-based system was able to question trip-level outliers (i.e., erroneous gear detection due to a poor data coverage), impose the predominant monthly gear type in use and/or validate real changes in fishing behavior, such as when vessels rotate fishing gears. • Fishing segment identification: once trips had been labeled according to the gear type, hauls were extracted when fishing vessels were likely engaging in fishing operations. Extracted fishing segments were stored in the single spatial database and ready to be aggregated and binned into grid cells. Segments were stored along with their attributes (MMSI, number of pings, speed class, distances, and duration) and related parent tables (trip ID and raw pings). • Finally, the intensity of fishing operations was mapped on a monthly and yearly basis and the output was represented on 1 km × 1 km grid cells, and populated with different metrics of fishing effort (i.e., fishing time and swept length). Annual/monthly fishing effort estimates were quantified in each grid cell spatial joining overlapping portions of hauls, and summing relative durations and lengths.

Data Collection and Preparation for DST
The geospatial dataset implemented for the study is composed of multi-source geospatial information from different regional (e.g., Veneto Region) and EU level data providers (i.e., EMODnet, Tools4MSP; [47][48][49]). The dataset includes 13 human uses (U) and 4 environmental components (E).
Tables 1 and 2 present a detailed overview of the geospatial dataset involved in the analysis. All datasets have been rasterized in a regular grid with cell resolution of 250 m × 250 m. The units of the spatial indicators U and E are presence/absence (i.e., aquaculture), weighted dummy (i.e., land-based activities) and intensity indicators (i.e., maritime traffic). Intensity indicators were transformed using log[x + 1] to avoid an over-dominance of extreme values and all datasets rescaled from 0 to 1 to allow direct comparison on a single, unit-less scale [46,50].

Data Collection and Preparation for DST
The geospatial dataset implemented for the study is composed of multi-source geospatial information from different regional (e.g., Veneto Region) and EU level data providers (i.e., EMODnet, Tools4MSP; [47][48][49]). The dataset includes 13 human uses (U) and 4 environmental components (E).
Tables 1 and 2 present a detailed overview of the geospatial dataset involved in the analysis. All datasets have been rasterized in a regular grid with cell resolution of 250 m × 250 m. The units of the spatial indicators U and E are presence/absence (i.e., aquaculture), weighted dummy (i.e., land-based activities) and intensity indicators (i.e., maritime traffic). Intensity indicators were transformed using log[x + 1] to avoid an over-dominance of extreme values and all datasets rescaled from 0 to 1 to allow direct comparison on a single, unit-less scale [46,50].  Density (nr of animals/100 km 2 ) categories [51] According to the MSFD Annex III (2017/845/EU), a total 15 anthropogenic pressures were investigated. The pressures' propagation from the sources followed various modeling approaches. Land based pressures (i.e., inputs of fertilizers and other nitrogen and phosphorus-rich substances, inputs of organic matter, and introduction of non-synthetic substances and compounds and other substances) from coastal anthropized areas were modeled using the open-source 3-D hydrodynamic model SHYFEM (Shallow water Hydrodynamic Finite Model) [53], reproducing the dynamics of substances from catchment basins into the Adriatic Sea [54]. In absence of specific and robust knowledge on the pressure propagation, we adopted an isotropic convolution function [21]. Detailed description of the pressure indicators and propagation models can be found in Menegon et al. [50] and Farella et al. [55].

Maritime Use Conflict (MUC) Analysis
Maritime use conflict analysis (MUC) was performed in order to analyze current interactions between human uses and to locate conflict areas, guiding in the structuring of planning processes that can support sustainable ocean zoning [56]. Tools4MSP MUC methodology is developed within the Tools4MSP Modelling Framework [57], an MSP-oriented open source software suite for geospatial analysis, which provides a multiobjective tool-set for MSP, and enables the identification of current/potential human uses and assesses their interaction in terms of conflicts. The MUC score on a single grid of analysis is calculated summing the potential conflict score between each combination of uses which are present in that cell (Equation (1)).
where c i,j = potential conflict score between U i and U j . It can vary from 0 (no conflict) to 6 (very high conflict score).
p(U i ) = presence (1) or absence (0) of the i-th human use in the cell. p(U j ) = presence (1) or absence (0) of the j-th human use in the cell. For a more detailed description of the MUC assessment we refer to Depellegrin et al. [54] and Menegon et al. [50].

Cumulative Effect (CEA) Analysis
The cumulative effects assessment (CEA) model applied in this research is based on the Tools4MSP Modelling Framework [57]. CEA is defined as a systematic procedure for identifying and evaluating the significance of effects from multiple pressures and/or activities on single or multiple receptors [58]. The algorithm is described in Equations (2) and (3) as follows: where eff is the effect of pressure P over the environmental component E and it is defined as follows: whereas U i defines the human uses active in the study area (Table 1); E k defines the environmental components of the study area (Table 2); d(E k ) defines intensity or presence/absence of the k-th environmental component; P j defines the 15 MSFD pressures exerted by human activities according to (EC, 2017, Annex III, Table 2); w i,j refer to the use-specific pressure weight [55]; s(P j ; E k ) is the sensitivity of the k-th environmental component to the j-th pressure [55], defined as the combination of the direct and indirect impact of a pressure, the degree of disturbance generated on the key ecological features and the recovery time of environmental components exposed [54]; i(U i , M(U i , P j , E k )) distance model propagating j-th pressure caused by i-th activity over the k-th environmental component; M(U i , P j ) 2D gaussian kernel function used for convolution (buffer distances at 1 km, 5 km, 10 km, 20 km, and 50 km) [57]; rfunc j,k defines the response function of the k-th environmental component to a j-th pressure. Identity function has been adopted for all j,k combination.

Stakeholder Engagement
Being fundamental for any planning process (according to MSP Directive 2014/89 EU, art. 21) [59][60][61], fishing operators and other relevant stakeholders were involved to analyze the issues relevant to the Compartment and identify possible measures. To this end, participatory workshops were organized. Three meetings (July 2018, November 2018, and May 2019) were held with fishing operators and invitations were extended to a selection of other stakeholders (municipalities, port authorities, aquaculture and tourism operators, recreational fishing groups, researchers, and NGOs). During these meetings the objectives and results of the study were illustrated and feedback from the participants was noted in real time, so as to make it immediately visible to all [62].
In addition, questionnaires were used to collect stakeholders' input. They were distributed during the meetings, and the participants were asked to fill them in on the spot. In this way, a more personal and private space for participation was offered, aiming to collect those ideas that might not be expressed because of existing tensions and conflicts between the categories of participants.

Management Framework Proposal
The study focused on the sustainability of fishing activities within the overall framework of the present coastal and marine human uses. The pivotal objective was the definition of a set of management proposals, responding to the following criteria: (i) maintaining/increasing the environmental sustainability of fisheries; (ii) preserving fisheries profitability and, possibly, stimulate the growth and development of the sector; (iii) reducing conflicts among marine uses and between different fishing sectors; and (iv) exploiting/leveraging potential synergies. The overarching vision was to ensure that fishing activities in the case study (CS) area do not compromise the marine environment and its resources, fostering a sustainable and balanced development of the sea space.
The specific planning objectives took into account the governance system (e.g., national waters within the 12 nm, and international waters and national continental shelf offshore the 12 nm), and the already established and proposed conservation measures (from Biological Protection Zones to Natura 2000 sites).
In line with the EU legal framework, in particular with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD, CE/2008/58) GES prescriptions for Descriptors 1 (Biodiversity), 3 (Commercial Fish and shellfish) and 6 (Sea-floor integrity) (2017/848/EU), specific environmental management measures were designed taking into account the safeguard of protected species and habitats, also including the Essential Fish Habitats (EFHs) of species of high commercial value, defined as areas where recruits/adults concentrate (i.e., nursery/potential spawning areas), within of the overall strategy addressing biodiversity conservation.
The priority issues for local fisheries were identified taking into account the conflicts and potential multiple impacts by analyzing the distribution of (1) CEA and (2) MUC scores. The MUC analysis highlighted the fishing sectors characterized by the highest conflicts (across fishing activities and with other uses of the sea) while CEA permitted to identify those whose effect was deemed to be more pervasive on specific environmental components. Through these analyses, it was possible to identify priority measures whose application could result in the reduction of conflicts and impacts in the case study area.
The range of measures considered was extended considering both expert-based knowledge in the area, and through the engagement of fisheries stakeholders in public meetings (see Section 2.2.5).

Fishing Activity from AIS Data
AIS allowed capturing large trawler's activities (170 fishing vessels, trawling at least once in 2015 within the compartment of Chioggia), while fishing activity with passive gears was underrepresented. This is because this fishery, based on the use of set nets and traps, is mostly carried out with small fishing vessels not adopting AIS. This fraction represents 68% of the whole registered fleet.
With regards to vessels equipped with AIS, bottom trawlers were dominant in the studied area, followed by beam and pelagic trawlers (79, 50 and 48 trawlers, respectively). Only three "other" vessels were identified and consisted of one dredge and two vessels supporting mussel farming sites.
Bottom and beam trawling footprints revealed to be habitat-dependent, with highly impacted grounds which leave well-known spatial patterns of benthic assemblages' distributions uncovered [63] (Figure 3a,b). By contrast, AIS detected pelagic trawlers' activities throughout the whole district (Figure 3c), and purse seiners only fishing outside its southern borders. Most vessels were found to be registered in the Chioggia compartment itself or in vicinity of its border, while only a very small number of trawlers (mostly beam trawling (TBB)) were tracked while leaving and/or returning ports further away from the case study area (e.g., ports of Venice, Pesaro, and Ancona).
The high spatial resolution of the AIS data allowed to assess the partial compliance to regulations, including the summer fishing ban (Ministerial Decree 03/07/2015; Figure 3d), and the measures banning all the activities in close proximity of offshore structures (i.e., Adriatic Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal) and managing fishery in specific areas (SAC/BPA). Indeed, AIS data confirmed the propensity of trawlers to concentrate close to the regulated areas, actual entering/fishing within 3 nm from the coast or inside the BPA Tenue Chioggia.   The higher scores are linked to the interactions between different trawling fleets (TBB, PTM, and OTB), contributing to over 50% of the total MUC score. Following, the interaction between maritime traffic and trawl fisheries (28%) exerted along the borders of the extensive no trawling zones (due to environmental protection and fishery management and other human activities such as LNG and aquaculture) and trawl fisheries (9%). Other relevant potential conflicts are those between coastal and maritime tourism with maritime transport, coastal and maritime tourism with small-scale fisheries, and between trawl and small-scale fisheries (Figure 4b).
3.1.3. Cumulative Effect (CEA) Analysis The higher scores are linked to the interactions between different trawling fleets (TBB, PTM, and OTB), contributing to over 50% of the total MUC score. Following, the interaction between maritime traffic and trawl fisheries (28%) exerted along the borders of the extensive no trawling zones (due to environmental protection and fishery management and other human activities such as LNG and aquaculture) and trawl fisheries (9%). Other relevant potential conflicts are those between coastal and maritime tourism with maritime transport, coastal and maritime tourism with small-scale fisheries, and between trawl and small-scale fisheries (Figure 4b).

Cumulative Effect (CEA) Analysis
The spatial explicit outputs of the CEA application are shown in Figure 5a. Highest scores (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) are located in the whole case study area, where intense maritime traffic areas, highly trawled fishing grounds and hot spots of species (i.e., marine turtles and mammals) and habitats (e.g., the circalittoral bio-constructions called tegnùe) of conservation interest occur: between 3 and 10 nm offshore, in a relatively small area in International waters (approximately 20 nm offshore) and close to the port of Chioggia. Areas showing mediumhigh scores (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) are widely spread along the area, mainly due to maritime traffic and trawling activities, while coastal areas far from ports and marinas and within the 3 nm, where trawl fisheries are banned with the significant exception of the areas subject to fishing with hydraulic dredges, feature lower CEA scores (<10). The spatial explicit outputs of the CEA application are shown in Figure 5a. Highest scores (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) are located in the whole case study area, where intense maritime traffic areas, highly trawled fishing grounds and hot spots of species (i.e., marine turtles and mammals) and habitats (e.g., the circalittoral bio-constructions called tegnùe) of conservation interest occur: between 3 and 10 nm offshore, in a relatively small area in International waters (approximately 20 nm offshore) and close to the port of Chioggia. Areas showing medium-high scores (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) are widely spread along the area, mainly due to maritime traffic and trawling activities, while coastal areas far from ports and marinas and within the 3 nm, where trawl fisheries are banned with the significant exception of the areas subject to fishing with hydraulic dredges, feature lower CEA scores (<10).  In the CS area, the full set of trawling activities causes the higher total CEA score (50%). In particular, bottom otter trawlers (OTB) generate the 19% of the total CEA score, while both "rapido" beam trawlers (TBB) and mid-water pelagic (PTM) exert pressures for a contribution to the total CEA score of the 18% and 11%, respectively (Figure 5b). On the other side, small-scale fisheries exerts less than the 2% of total CEA score while they are present in the 12% of the area (mainly within the 3 nm).
The complex system of maritime traffic is the most widespread human use, covering almost 100% of the CS cells, and represent the second main source of human pressures (40% of the total CEA score), while port activities in the area are concentrated close to the city of Chioggia, exerting low CEA scores (0.3% of the total).
The LNG plant, while contributing less than the 1% to the overall CEA score for the entire area, determine the highest single-cell CEA score value, generating related pressures mainly due to the introduction of substances into the sea (i.e., chlorinated waters) and underwater noise that spread from the source for a radius of about five km.
Land sourced anthropogenic pressures are strongly related to riverine inputs (e.g., Po river) and have a significant contribution to the overall CEA score (>6%), with higher scores within the 6 nm offshore. Spatial extent and/or intensities of other important human activities (e.g., coastal and maritime tourism, hydraulic dredges fisheries, and aquaculture) are lower, with lesser contributions to the total CEA score (<2%), even if high absolute scores may be found in their proximity.
Nursery and spawning areas of species of commercial interest for fisheries (EFHs) are widespread in the whole area and represent the environmental components more exposed to anthropogenic pressures (e.g., abrasion, pollution, and marine litter; 31.1% of the total CEA score). The whole set of human activities (especially trawling and traffic) generate a high cumulative effect score (13.6%) on C. caretta, present in the whole CS area with high seasonal variations. Marine mammals are similarly affected even though to a lower extent (9.7%) due to both lower densities and sensitivities to specific pressures (Figure 5c).
Both muddy (represented in the 64% of the CS area) and sandy (36%) seabeds are also highly exposed to the analyzed pressures (e.g., abrasion, pollution, and marine litter) in the area (23.1% of the total CEA score).
The rocky bottoms and coralligenous communities are also influenced by numerous pressures that propagate from various activities but show low CEA scores due to the protection and trawling bans of the tegnùe area.

Priorities for Long-Term Sustainable Fisheries in the Area
Environmental protection and lasting socio-economic development combine to define a model of sustainable management of fishing activities that preserves fish resources in the long term, protects the good state of marine species and ecosystems, guarantees the livelihood of operators, and allows conservation of practices, knowledge, and crafts for the benefit of coastal communities.
On the basis of the results derived from available knowledge (literature analysis and collected data) and from the application of the analysis tools, as well as from the interaction with fishing operators and with other stakeholders, a series of issues considered as priorities for the sustainable management of fishing activities have been identified, as reported in Table 3.  Techniques and practices can be developed and tested, also with the contribution of operators, to minimize the negative effects of fishing on some species in particular (e.g., bottlenose dolphins, turtles, and non-target fish species), on habitats (e.g., bioconstructions, bottom communities) or ecosystems.

E Fragmentation of the sector
Fragmentation in the sector impairs innovation and the diversification capacities, makes it less representative in decision-making contexts, and increases internal conflicts.

F Lack of common rules
The study area is used not only by local fisheries but also by fisheries from neighboring fishing ports, such as Rimini and Cesenatico (Emilia-Romagna Region) and Ancona (Marche Region). Furthermore, there is competition for resources and shared markets with foreign fisheries, in particular with the Croatian one. When the space-time regulations in place are different, disadvantages-and consequently conflicts-may arise for one or the other part.

G Synergies between fishing, aquaculture and other uses of the sea
In a context of lower and lower profitability in the sector, developing innovative activities, complementary to fishing, represents an opportunity for integration of income. The environmental, historical and cultural richness of the case study area creates a favorable context for the development of synergies between the fishing sector and other uses of the sea such as tourism and recreation.

H Need to increase the whole product value chain
The current organization of product distribution-including competition from abroad-determines the race for lower and lower prices. With higher value of product, catches could be reduced because fishermen could get the same income with a lower number of fishing days.

Measure Typologies
Priorities to be tackled to ensure long-term sustainable fisheries in the area are numerous and heterogeneous. For this reason, they require the implementation of a wide and diversified range of measures, belonging to different conceptual typologies (Table 4). Aimed at increasing knowledge on the characteristics of the sea and marine ecosystems in the study area, on fishing practices and their effects, on other coastal and maritime activities that interact with fishing 6 Monitoring, control and surveillance Aimed at measuring the trend of parameters relating to fishing activities and the characteristics of marine ecosystems; and monitoring compliance with rules and regulations relating to fishing activities in force in the study area.

7
Multi-level governance Measures aimed at improving the organization and management of fishing activities; Economic and financial measures Measures dealing with economic aspects (including taxation) and aimed to identify financial resources to support the performance and the start-up of activities, including innovative ones (e.g., incentives, financing, and indemnities) 10 Entrepreneurial development and marketing Measures aimed at increasing the entrepreneurial capacity of operators, including organizational and representative aspects, and the ability to commercialize the product 11 Training and engagement of operators Measures aimed at training of fishing operators on specific technical topics and encouraging the active participation in decision-making and management processes 12 Education and awareness raising of the public Measures aimed at informing consumers about fishing activities and their products, with particular reference to the seasonality of species, lesser known species, the need to prefer local products, and fished with sustainable techniques.

Possible Management Measures
A catalog of 78 measures (Appendix A, Figure 6) has been composed, belonging to one of the 12 typologies and targeting one or more of the priorities, with a predominance of those targeting Theme D-(environmental) impacts (24 measures identified). The measures concerning the training and involvement of fishermen (Type 11) represent the most numerous, followed by initiatives to improve the governance and management system of fisheries (Type 7), by initiatives aimed at increasing the entrepreneurial capacity of operators (Type 10) and by cognitive measures (Type 5). Measures aimed at informing consumers about fishing activities and their products, with particular reference to the seasonality of species, lesser known species, the need to prefer local products, and fished with sustainable techniques.

Possible Management Measures
A catalog of 78 measures (Appendix A, Figure 6) has been composed, belonging to one of the 12 typologies and targeting one or more of the priorities, with a predominance of those targeting Theme D-(environmental) impacts (24 measures identified). The measures concerning the training and involvement of fishermen (Type 11) represent the most numerous, followed by initiatives to improve the governance and management system of fisheries (Type 7), by initiatives aimed at increasing the entrepreneurial capacity of operators (Type 10) and by cognitive measures (Type 5).

Discussion
Human pressures on Mediterranean coastal and marine ecosystems have significantly increased in number and intensity during the last decades, generating the degradation of habitats of high ecological and socioeconomic value [46,64]. Among the intense human activities carried out in the Adriatic Sea, fisheries are those that more than others embed an added value, not only economical, but also social and historical-cultural for the entire region. Many Adriatic coastal communities have fishing and aquaculture as their primary economic activity. However, even if fishing activities have influenced the abundance of marine resources in the Adriatic for centuries [42], their recent mechanization and intensification, with a growing direct and indirect exploitation of resources [2], has increased the overall alteration of habitats and species, the reduction of biodiversity and of the main fish stocks of commercial interest [65]. In particular, numerous studies have highlighted how the fishery resources and ecosystems in the Adriatic Sea are highly vulnerable to trawling fisheries [66]. Trawling has well-documented impacts on benthic biodiversity [67], sensitive habitats, and species [68].
In this context, this study explored the potential opportunities and difficulties of applying the consolidated framework of ecosystem based maritime spatial planning (EB-MSP) [14], focusing on the fishing sector in a context of multiple sea uses, such as that of the Chioggia compartment. A general long-term vision of the Adriatic Sea in a good environmental, healthy and productive status, requires proper implementation of EBM through an appropriate planning process, aimed at long-term sustainable management in order to promote conservation strategies, ensure profitability to the fishing sector, and enhance synergies with other coastal and maritime uses.
In this study, the spatially explicit analyses developed according to EB-MSP approach were able to quantitatively integrate the effect from multiple anthropogenic pressure and highlight how the whole set of human activities interacts and exerts multiple relevant biological, physical and energy related pressures to the environment.
In particular, the Cumulative Effects Assessment analysis was performed in order to inform on the propagation of pressures generated by the system of multiple anthropogenic uses and to assess the spatial distribution (i.e., footprint) of impacts exerted on environmental receptors.
Results from the tool-based analysis confirmed the general understanding available for the area about the most relevant impacting activities, but also provide, as added value, the spatial distribution of the effects on the various environmental receptors considered, and an assessment of the relative quantitative contribution of the different uses to the overall impact.
Maritime transport exerts a broad set of pressures on the case study area, mainly due to the extensive presence of shipping activities and cruise ports in the Northern-Central Adriatic (e.g., ports of Koper, Trieste, Venice, Ravenna, and Ancona). Due to this characteristics, the maritime transport issues cannot be locally managed. Indeed, those wider influences have basin-scale features that need to be addressed in framing management measures for the overall sustainability of the maritime transport in the Adriatic-Ionian region.
Tool-based analyses allowed to spatially highlight the footprint of trawling-related disturbances in the area, that resulted in being the most important source of anthropogenic pressures and generate potential conflicts with other sectors. On the other hand, small scale fishing, representing the most relevant fishing activity in the study area in terms of average number of active vessels and employment rates, even if it extends over a limited portion of the study area, generates almost irrelevant impacts if compared to the towed gears, whose spatial footprint is spatially readily wider.
Patterns of scores detected at local scale highlight that Essential Fish Habitats (EFHs) and soft-bottom communities are the most affected by anthropogenic activities, especially those that generate mechanical damage to the seabed, extraction of species, and marine litter introduction. Seabed habitats in the Adriatic Sea host high biodiverse communities [69], as well as important recruitment and reproduction areas of valuable fish species [38,70], urging the need to protect the hot-spot of EFHs from the long-term effects of pressures (i.e., from bottom trawling) through the adoption of effective, area-based, and adaptive conservation measures.
Results also highlight how human activities in the case study area may affect marine turtles and bottlenose dolphins [71,72], potentially determining a wide set of effects on species, from direct mortality [73] to behavioral changes [74].
Such evidences require the adoption of management and conservation measures able to reduce the impacts of fishing on the Adriatic ecosystems, while guaranteeing its economic, productive and occupational perspectives [55]. Conservation measures should effectively address trawling-related pressures [75], aiming at a long-term maintenance of fish stocks [76] and the conservation of pelagic species in the area (especially C. caretta) [77].
Environmental protection measures imposing permanent bans or restrictions on the use of fishing techniques causing abrasion to the seabed are already in force within the case study boundaries. Towed gears are banned within a distance of 3 nm from the coast and inside the Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) "Tegnùe di Chioggia" (N2K IT3250047). Our results highlight however how trawling bans, in order to generate conservation benefits to fish assemblages and habitats, should be included within an adequate spatial planning framework, i.e., according to hot-spot of trawling-related pressures exerted to specific habitats and species, and accompanied by enforcement of effective control measures [35,78]. According to the fishing fleet registers of Chioggia, only 150 vessels (out of a total of 482 registered vessels) were indeed above 15 m in overall length (LOA), making AIS coverage for the whole fleet weak. Other specific fishing activities (e.g., hydraulic dredging), might determine significant pressures per unit of surface, but their overall contribution was not fully represented due to lack of AIS coverage. Nevertheless, vessel tracking data had proven uniquely insightful, presenting a valuable quantitative and open opportunity to well characterize fishing footprints and understand the dynamics of the fisheries sector, while fostering the need for the development of a publicly accessible registration system for fishing activities through transparent management of AIS data for all the fishing vessels. This may also improve fishermen's compliance with existing rules, entrusting the responsibility for some monitoring and control actions to stakeholders, as part of co-management schemes.
Conservation objectives in the area may be also enhanced by the introduction of other trawling restricted zones (e.g., safety regulations within 500 m from LNG plan, pipelines, aquaculture facilities), which could exert a synergistic effect with the existing conservation measures, being able to determine conservation benefits as "Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures" (OECM) [79].
The policies, strategies and regulatory framework of the European Union for the seas support the protection of marine ecosystems while promoting sustainable, planned and synergistic management of economic activities.
In example, the newly established pSCI/SAC (Habitat Directive, 92/43/EEC) site for the protection of turtles and bottlenose dolphins concerning the hot-spot area [51,74] in territorial waters facing the mouth of the River Po (Resolution No 1135 of the Veneto Regional Executive, 6 August 2020) can be a first step towards the conservation needs of the two species, especially if it will be included, together with the adjacent one in Emilia-Romagna waters (Resolution No 1572 of the Emilia-Romagna Regional Executive, 9 November 2020), in a wider protection framework in the whole Adriatic area [51]. The management of these new protection areas require a thorough application of systematic monitoring, also taking into account the seasonal variations of the Adriatic populations and accordingly applying adaptive management measures. The measures to be adopted for the fishing sector should aim at reducing the risks of interaction between fishing activities and the protected species/habitats, through spatial [80] and operational [81] limitations and specific technological improvements, such as Bycatch Reduction Devices (BRDs) [82,83], even on a seasonal basis. The new N2K site should also be appropriately managed through participatory governance between administrations and stakeholders, with awarenessraising and ad hoc training activities, also including research and monitoring activities.
The use of modeling tools in the analysis of fishing activities footprint [31] and of the interactions (conflicts and synergies) between fishing and other uses of the sea and of the impacts on environmental components, has proved very useful not only for the identification of possible criticalities but also to support an effective exchange with stakeholders and local authorities [55,84].
The involvement of fishermen and other key stakeholders proved to be an indispensable, but not trivial, step in the process. These activities highlighted the need to undertaking appropriate consultations within the process, in order to build trust between stakeholders and decision makers, to share objectives and management, to encourage voluntary adherence to rules and regulations, and to generate new options and solutions through the inclusion of information from diversified sources (e.g., local ecological knowledge and traditions). Once accepted as working instruments in the co-management process, toolderived results can provide objective contribution to the discussion about the elaboration of alternative management scenarios.
Conscious management choices that allow the transition to a multi-use system that gives more space to renewable resources are needed, as well as sustainable and economically advantageous activities for coastal communities (e.g., fishing tourism, initiatives to shorten the fish distribution chain, sustainable tourism, etc.). Choices that not only aim at reducing conflicts between uses and the impacts on environmental components but that are also an opportunity to develop unexpressed potential. As an example, potential conflicts between trawling and other activities, highlighted by MUC analyses, could be overtaken by policies in favor of small-scale fisheries and aquaculture, accompanying the decommissioning of the heavy trawler fleets, fostering synergies through the development of complementary activities such environmental/cultural tourism [85]. The portfolio of possible measures that can be adopted provides clear evidence that to respond to the priorities identified, it is necessary to combine and integrate different types of measures: spatial measures modulated over time, monitoring and control, actions to fill knowledge gaps, concertation-involvement-co-management actions, improvement of governance systems, actions to support innovation in the sector, etc. The identification of the main problems to be addressed in order to favor the maintenance and development of fishing activities within the framework of socio-economic and environmental sustainability has focused on identifying trends and needs and on understanding how to correctly implement the proposed measures. However, a thorough definition of measures' implications, with particular regards to their socio-economic feasibility, costs and benefits, is compelling. Economic and financial measures, together with targeted financing opportunities within the European funds for Regional Development, should be carefully considered within the composition of one or more management scenarios for fisheries, aiming to define a complete, feasible and verifiable plan of actions.
These overall needs are urgent especially considering the risks associated with the potential effects of climate change [86,87]. Complex phenomena such warming of waters, alteration of geological and oceanographic dynamics, increasingly frequent extreme meteorological phenomena, risks on the geomorphology of the delta [88], and altered hydrological dynamics of the Po river and, as a cascade, their ecological consequences on species (e.g., behavioral and life-cycles changes), habitats and ecosystems, with unpredictable effects on fish stocks [89] and on the target species of environmental protection, require to support the development and application of the best scientific knowledge with a precautionary [90], adaptive, and dynamic management.

Conclusions
The results of this research show how the use of conceptual, scientific and legal MSP processes for the management of fishing activities in the Chioggia compartment allows to enhance the coexistence with the other uses of the sea and with all the existing area-based conservation measures (e.g., Natura 2000 Sites), at the same time favoring the achievement of Good Environmental Status targets and the safeguarding of the fishing traditions of local communities.
The drafting of the Italian national Maritime Space Plans underway pursuant to Directive 89/2014/EU by the Technical Committee coordinated by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport (MSP Competent Authority) offers an opportunity in this sense, provided that this opportunity is seized and managed by the territories, with the involvement of stakeholders, and not practiced as a mere bureaucratic fulfillment.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Spatial-Temporal measure
Measure B2a-Time extension of the biological rest period for towed gears (also on a voluntary basis).
3. Behavioral measures Measure B3a-Adoption of good practices on board to reduce all the accessory impacts of fishing activities (e.g., waste management).
4. Technical and technological improvements Measure B4a-Research and introduction of technical measures aimed at reducing the impacts of all fishing techniques.
Measure B4b-Increase in the mesh of gillnets (e.g., minimum 72 mm stretched mesh size).
5. Knowledge measures Measure B5a-Study of the spatial-temporal evolution of the fishing effort through a pilot system for recording fishing activities (Fishing vessel tracking system) in order to evaluate the sustainable effort in the area.
6. Monitoring, control and surveillance Measure B6a-Development of a pilot registration system for fishing activities (Fishing vessel tracking system) through transparent management and live use of AIS data for all the fishing vessels with LOA > 12 m in order to enforce surveillance.
8. Regulations and administrative measures Measure B8a-Administrative simplification of the licensing system, which allows the planning and application of management measures.
11. Training and engagement of operators Measure B11a-Preparation of "living lab" initiatives and co-participatory activities, in collaboration with the Region. Appendix A.3. Issue C. Rules Enforcement

Monitoring, control and surveillance
Measure C6a-Improvement of control systems for all fishing activities, including recreational ones and compliance with existing rules; where possible, participation and co-management of these systems.
Measure C6b-Entrusting the responsibility for some monitoring and control actions to stakeholders, as part of co-management schemes.
7. Multi-level governance Measure C7a-Introduction of co-management schemes through a participatory approach and with the involvement of all the stakeholders.
Measure C7b-Creation of an operations center for verifying the adoption of space-time measures with the direct involvement of all the fisheries operators.
8. Regulations and administrative measures Measure C8a-Definition of an administrative and regulatory process that allows the delegation from the directors to the stakeholders, in the face of increased responsibilities and in a logic of co-management. 9. Economic and financial measures Measure C9a-Actions to support the development of co-management plans. 11. Training and engagement of operators Measure C11a-Involvement of operators and stakeholders in participatory and co-management paths, including monitoring and control activities.
Measure C11b -Promote the adoption of best practices by creating a participatory process for the definition of management measures/rules. Measure C11c-Training of operators in order to increase knowledge and compliance with the rules.
12. Education and awareness raising of the public Measure C12a-Public meetings with operators in order to increase knowledge and compliance with the rules.
Measure D11b-Training of fishermen for the correct management, eventual release and care of accidentally captured animals (mainly C. caretta).
Measure D11c-Direct participation of fishing operators in the management of any new protected areas.
12. Education and awareness raising of the public Measure D12a-Implementation of awareness campaigns on the meaning, value, benefits of the environmental measures adopted.
Appendix A.5. Issue E. Fragmentation of the Sector

Multi-level governance
Measure E7a-Establishment of a fisheries observatory (also for joint consultation and lobbying).
Measure E7b-Promotion of the establishment or strengthening of compartmental consortia.
Measure E7c-Verification and integration of regional institutional mechanisms, in order to guarantee the recognition of sector organizations and their involvement in all activities involving the development of the sector.
Measure E7d-Promotion of the identification of one representative per fishing sector, with periodic renewal of the position, who actively participates in the management tables.
10. Entrepreneurial development and marketing Measure E10a-Promotion of clusters, consortia, or other associations in the sector. Measure E10b-Promotion of the development of integrated systems for the management, transformation and enhancement of the fishing products.
11. Training and engagement of operators Measure E11a-Promotion of the aggregation of the sector through its involvement in processes relevant to the territory (MSP, infrastructural interventions, use of the coast by other sectors).
Measure E11b-Creation of training opportunities on the possible different associative modalities, providing examples of good and fruitful practices.