The Efficiency of LED Irradiation for Cultivating High-Quality Tomato Seedlings

Light qualities are considered to affect many plant physiological processes during growth and development. To investigate how light qualities make an influence on tomato seedlings under greenhouse conditions, the growth and morphological parameters of tomato seedlings (Fortizia F1RC hybrid) were studied under three supplemental light irradiations such as light-emitting diodes with nanoparticle coating (LED 1—Red light-emitting diodes); Blue, Green, Yellow, Red light-emitting diodes (LED 2), and traditional high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps with different photosynthetic photon flux density and the same irradiation time for 33 days. Morphological appearances of three groups of tomato seedlings were different between light treatments, that is, the plants under LED1 and LED-2 were shorter than those under HPS, while stem diameter, leaf area, dry and fresh weights, and health indices of tomato seedlings grown under alternative light sources were higher than of those cultivated under traditional HPS lights. However, the higher plant height was in plants containing traditional high-pressure sodium lamps treatment. Photosynthetic pigments were shown to have a significant difference under respective light irradiations of LEDs. The levels of photosynthetic pigments were higher in the leaves of seedlings under LED 1 and LED 2, and lower in those that underwent HPS control treatment. Based on the data of morphological and statistical analysis, LEDs with nanoparticle coating proved to be beneficial factors for the growth of tomato seedlings under greenhouse conditions.


Introduction
Proper growing conditions in the greenhouse are crucial to providing high-quality tomato seedlings and further tomato fruits yield. The development and physiology of plants are highly influenced by the light spectrum of the greenhouse environment. Light is known as the most important source of energy for plant photosynthesis and is an important signal of its growth and development. Light, its intensity, quality, and duration are the fundamental factors that affect the process of photosynthesis and plant growth. Light also affects the content of primary and secondary metabolites in plants [1]. Under artificial growing conditions, a lighting system can determine the cost and nutrient quality of plants [2,3]. Light qualities are known to control morphogenesis, growth, and differentiation of plant cells, tissue and organ cultures [4]. the suitable light intensity for the two cultivations of Fortizia F1RCtomato under local greenhouse conditions. Morphological characters, stem diameter, leaf area, and dry weight of plants have been determined after exposure to different supplemental light sources.

Plant Material and Growing Conditions
The experiment took place in the greenhouse of Led System Medial LLP located in Nur-Sultan city, Kazakhstan. The tomato seedlings were subject to supplemental lighting of LED with nanoparticle coating (Figure 1) and traditional high-pressure sodium lamps (HPS). The experimental facility air temperature was automatically maintained at +23-24 • C with the help of an air conditioning system, and the relative humidity was maintained at 60-70%. The microclimate was controlled using a multifunctional meteorological station model Terasea (Luxembourg, Germany).
has been observed to be of a significant effect in many other scientific fields [14].
The objectives of this study were to examine how LEDs with nanoparticle coating manufactured by LED System LLP affect plant growth and transplant quality and to find the suitable light intensity for the two cultivations of Fortizia F1RCtomato under local greenhouse conditions. Morphological characters, stem diameter, leaf area, and dry weight of plants have been determined after exposure to different supplemental light sources.

Plant Material and Growing Conditions
The experiment took place in the greenhouse of Led System Medial LLP located in Nur-Sultan city, Kazakhstan. The tomato seedlings were subject to supplemental lighting of LED with nanoparticle coating (Figure 1) and traditional high-pressure sodium lamps (HPS). The experimental facility air temperature was automatically maintained at +23-24 °C with the help of an air conditioning system, and the relative humidity was maintained at 60-70%. The microclimate was controlled using a multifunctional meteorological station model Terasea (Luxembourg, Germany).
Plant material: Fortizia F1RC hybrid tomato seedlings, in total 80 pieces. The seeds were planted in seed starter trays on 15 February 2021. Only calibrated and treated seeds were sewn. The quality of seeds corresponded to the 1st class seeds Seeds were planted in rock wool cubes moistened to 100%. Seeds were planted in excess by 10% in the case of rejection or replacing the fallen ones. Seeds planting was done by hand. Seeds were sprinkled on top with vermiculite. Before planting seeds, rock wool cubes were saturated with the nutrient solution with 1.8 concentrations, pH-5.5. For optimal vegetative growth, the nutrient solution with high calcium content and ammoniafree fertilizers were used. Plant material: Fortizia F1RC hybrid tomato seedlings, in total 80 pieces. The seeds were planted in seed starter trays on 15 February 2021. Only calibrated and treated seeds were sewn. The quality of seeds corresponded to the 1st class seeds.
Seeds were planted in rock wool cubes moistened to 100%. Seeds were planted in excess by 10% in the case of rejection or replacing the fallen ones. Seeds planting was done by hand. Seeds were sprinkled on top with vermiculite. Before planting seeds, rock wool cubes were saturated with the nutrient solution with 1.8 concentrations, pH-5.5. For optimal vegetative growth, the nutrient solution with high calcium content and ammonia-free fertilizers were used.
Germinated seeds (after 2-3 days) were transferred under a light source for 24 h supplemental lighting (illuminance was 8 kilolux) for 3 days. The other 12 days the treatment with supplemental lighting was carried out for 17 h a day. At the two and Sustainability 2021, 13, 9426 4 of 11 three-leave stage seedlings were pricked out into mineral wool cubes. The number of seedlings transplanted per 1 m 2 was 25 pieces. After pricking out, the number of seedlings per 1 m 2 was maintained at 20 pieces. The conductivity of the nutrient solution was maintained at EC = 1.3-1.7 µS/cm. The growing of seedlings was completed by the 45th day after germination. After the experiment, we examined the growth and quality of tomato seedlings. Biometrical and phenological observations were taken according to the State methodology of crop variety testing [15].
The study of the pigments of the leaf of tomato seedlings was carried out in accordance with the generally accepted method for determining the content of the main pigments, using spectrophotometric analysis [16].

Experimental Facility
The experiment was carried out in the specialized experimental facility designed and manufactured for research of tomato seedlings' growth under supplemental lighting and traditional HPS lights (control).
Experimental LED lights of domestic origin (hereinafter, LED lights) were used as a photosynthetically active radiation source (PAR). Lights in the experimental facility were in the form of closed shelves designed for tomato seedlings growing. Experimental facilities for growing tomato seedlings consist of an LED irradiation system and a nutrient solution supply system. The brightness of the irradiation system can be adjusted in the range of 50-100%. The LED lighting system of each shelf has its spectral compositions (Table 1). LED lighting system turns on and turns off automatically. The photoperiod was 17 h a day. Germinated seeds (after 2-3 days) were transferred under a light source for 24 h supplemental lighting (illuminance was 8 kilolux) for 3 days. The other 12 days the treatment with supplemental lighting was carried out for 17 h a day. At the two and three-leave stage seedlings were pricked out into mineral wool cubes. The number of seedlings transplanted per 1 m 2 was 25 pieces. After pricking out, the number of seedlings per 1 m 2 was maintained at 20 pieces. The conductivity of the nutrient solution was maintained at EC = 1.3-1.7 µS/cm. The growing of seedlings was completed by the 45th day after germination. After the experiment, we examined the growth and quality of tomato seedlings. Biometrical and phenological observations were taken according to the State methodology of crop variety testing [15].
The study of the pigments of the leaf of tomato seedlings was carried out in accordance with the generally accepted method for determining the content of the main pigments, using spectrophotometric analysis [16].

Experimental Facility
The experiment was carried out in the specialized experimental facility designed and manufactured for research of tomato seedlings' growth under supplemental lighting and traditional HPS lights (control).
Experimental LED lights of domestic origin (hereinafter, LED lights) were used as a photosynthetically active radiation source (PAR). Lights in the experimental facility were in the form of closed shelves designed for tomato seedlings growing. Experimental facilities for growing tomato seedlings consist of an LED irradiation system and a nutrient solution supply system. The brightness of the irradiation system can be adjusted in the range of 50-100%. The LED lighting system of each shelf has its spectral compositions (Table 1). LED lighting system turns on and turns off automatically. The photoperiod was 17 h a day. Germinated seeds (after 2-3 days) were transferred under a light source for 24 h supplemental lighting (illuminance was 8 kilolux) for 3 days. The other 12 days the treatment with supplemental lighting was carried out for 17 h a day. At the two and three-leave stage seedlings were pricked out into mineral wool cubes. The number of seedlings transplanted per 1 m 2 was 25 pieces. After pricking out, the number of seedlings per 1 m 2 was maintained at 20 pieces. The conductivity of the nutrient solution was maintained at EC = 1.3-1.7 µS/cm. The growing of seedlings was completed by the 45th day after germination. After the experiment, we examined the growth and quality of tomato seedlings. Biometrical and phenological observations were taken according to the State methodology of crop variety testing [15].
The study of the pigments of the leaf of tomato seedlings was carried out in accordance with the generally accepted method for determining the content of the main pigments, using spectrophotometric analysis [16].

Experimental Facility
The experiment was carried out in the specialized experimental facility designed and manufactured for research of tomato seedlings' growth under supplemental lighting and traditional HPS lights (control).
Experimental LED lights of domestic origin (hereinafter, LED lights) were used as a photosynthetically active radiation source (PAR). Lights in the experimental facility were in the form of closed shelves designed for tomato seedlings growing. Experimental facilities for growing tomato seedlings consist of an LED irradiation system and a nutrient solution supply system. The brightness of the irradiation system can be adjusted in the range of 50-100%. The LED lighting system of each shelf has its spectral compositions (Table 1). LED lighting system turns on and turns off automatically. The photoperiod was 17 h a day. Germinated seeds (after 2-3 days) were transferred under a light source for 24 h supplemental lighting (illuminance was 8 kilolux) for 3 days. The other 12 days the treatment with supplemental lighting was carried out for 17 h a day. At the two and three-leave stage seedlings were pricked out into mineral wool cubes. The number of seedlings transplanted per 1 m 2 was 25 pieces. After pricking out, the number of seedlings per 1 m 2 was maintained at 20 pieces. The conductivity of the nutrient solution was maintained at EC = 1.3-1.7 µS/cm. The growing of seedlings was completed by the 45th day after germination. After the experiment, we examined the growth and quality of tomato seedlings. Biometrical and phenological observations were taken according to the State methodology of crop variety testing [15].
The study of the pigments of the leaf of tomato seedlings was carried out in accordance with the generally accepted method for determining the content of the main pigments, using spectrophotometric analysis [16].

Experimental Facility
The experiment was carried out in the specialized experimental facility designed and manufactured for research of tomato seedlings' growth under supplemental lighting and traditional HPS lights (control).
Experimental LED lights of domestic origin (hereinafter, LED lights) were used as a photosynthetically active radiation source (PAR). Lights in the experimental facility were in the form of closed shelves designed for tomato seedlings growing. Experimental facilities for growing tomato seedlings consist of an LED irradiation system and a nutrient solution supply system. The brightness of the irradiation system can be adjusted in the range of 50-100%. The LED lighting system of each shelf has its spectral compositions (Table 1). LED lighting system turns on and turns off automatically. The photoperiod was 17 h a day.

Analysis of Growth Parameters and Biomass of Plants
Biometrical and phenological observations of tomato seedlings were taken according to the State methodology of crop variety testing. As a result of phenological measurements, the following dates were recorded: planting date, single and mass germination dates. Once Sustainability 2021, 13, 9426 5 of 11 a week we carried the measurement of the following indicators, such as the height of the main stem (cm), stem diameter (mm), and leaf area (cm 2 ). The height of plants was measured from the main stem base up to the plant's top with the help of a ruler. The measurement of stem diameter was performed with electronic Vernier calipers. Leaf area of single leaves (cm 2 ) was measured using the ImageJ leaf disc method [17].
The most significant indicator for cultivation is the biological productivity of plants identified by the dry mass yield. The growth of a plant can be measured by its dry weight and fresh weight. The increase in dry weight directly relates to the rate of photosynthesis [18,19].

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS 21.0) for Windows as well as using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), while the differences among the means were calculated using Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Environmental Conditions during the Experiment
One of the most important microclimate parameters affecting tomato production and quality is air temperature [20]. Jun et al. [21] reported that the best temperature regime for net photosynthesis on greenhouse-grown tomatoes is 28/20 • C (day/night), while higher or lower temperatures can negatively affect fruit sets [22]. In this research, minimum and maximum average air temperatures inside the greenhouse were maintained between +20 • C and +22 • C, and the relative humidity was maintained at 60-70%.

Morphological Analysis and Biometrical Parameters
The results revealed that light qualities had significant effects on tomato seedlings' morphogenesis ( Table 2). The morphology of tomato seedlings was significantly different under different light intensities ( Table 3). As can be seen in Table 2, HPS (control) light's effect was the lowest, particularly, stem diameter, dry weight, leaf area, and health index. LED-1 demonstrated better results in such indices as dry weight (g), fresh weight (g), height (cm), and health index, while LED-2 was more efficient in tomato seedlings' stem diameter (cm) and leaf area (cm 2 ). To analyze the growth dynamics, we measured the height of tomato seedlings. Plant height is one of the most important indices. As shown in Figure 2A during the first 12 days under all treatments were statistically at par, while the measurements on the 26th and 33rd days after planting in HPS control were higher, than in LED 1 and LED 2.
height is one of the most important indices. As shown in Figure 2A during the first 12 days under all treatments were statistically at par, while the measurements on the 26th and 33rd days after planting in HPS control were higher, than in LED 1 and LED 2.
Illumination of plants in the HPS variant (control) led to the elongation of the stem thereby leading to the elongation of the stem of the control plants. Such plants become less resistant to adverse external influences (Table 3). When the organs of plants are pulled out, their cells from a horizontal position take a vertical one. They become larger, with thin shells, but their number remains the same. Such cells become less resistant to adverse exter nal influences, are more often affected by diseases, and are damaged by pests. The reason that gives rise to the phenomenon of stretching can be a significant lack of illumination. The stem diameter is an important parameter describing the growth of the tomato plant during the vegetative period [23]. The stem plays a key role in the transportation o water and the translocation of carbohydrates [24]. The stem diameter is an important pa rameter describing the growth of crop plants under abiotic stress during the vegetative growth stage. Therefore, it is important to improve the stem diameter growth model to predict the response of stem diameter variations (SDV) to environmental changes and plant growth under different conditions. Figure 2B demonstrates the effect of experi mental LED lights and HPS lighting on the tomato seedlings' stem diameter. Supple mental lighting increased hypocotyl diameter, epicotyl length, shoot dry weight, lea number, and leaf expansion relative to the control, whereas hypocotyl elongation de creased when SL was applied. For all cultivars tested, the combination of red and blue in SL typically increased the growth of tomato seedlings [25]. Morphological appearances o seedlings were significantly different between light treatments, that is, the plants under RB and RBG were shorter and stronger than those under C, while those under O, G, and R were higher and weaker [26]. Light irradiations with LEDs had significant effects on the morphological appearances of cherry tomato seedlings (Table 2 and Figure 2). Compared  (Table 3). When the organs of plants are pulled out, their cells from a horizontal position take a vertical one. They become larger, with thin shells, but their number remains the same. Such cells become less resistant to adverse external influences, are more often affected by diseases, and are damaged by pests. The reason that gives rise to the phenomenon of stretching can be a significant lack of illumination.
The stem diameter is an important parameter describing the growth of the tomato plant during the vegetative period [23]. The stem plays a key role in the transportation of water and the translocation of carbohydrates [24]. The stem diameter is an important parameter describing the growth of crop plants under abiotic stress during the vegetative growth stage. Therefore, it is important to improve the stem diameter growth model to predict the response of stem diameter variations (SDV) to environmental changes and plant growth under different conditions. Figure 2B demonstrates the effect of experimental LED lights and HPS lighting on the tomato seedlings' stem diameter. Supplemental lighting increased hypocotyl diameter, epicotyl length, shoot dry weight, leaf number, and leaf expansion relative to the control, whereas hypocotyl elongation decreased when SL was applied. For all cultivars tested, the combination of red and blue in SL typically increased the growth of tomato seedlings [25]. Morphological appearances of seedlings were significantly different between light treatments, that is, the plants under RB and RBG were shorter and stronger than those under C, while those under O, G, and R were higher and weaker [26]. Light irradiations with LEDs had significant effects on the morphological appearances of cherry tomato seedlings (Table 2 and Figure 2). Compared with the C treatment, the plants of R, O, and G treatment were significantly weaker and higher, while the plants of B, RB, and RBG treatments were stronger and lower. Stem diameter did not show significant differences among all light treatments. Leaf area of plants irradiated with C was significantly larger than those under the other LEDs and there was shown to be no significant difference among those under the irradiations of the other LEDs. The dry weight and fresh weight of the plants with B were significantly higher than that with respective irradiations of the R, O, G LED and that with RB, and RBG followed. The content of water in plants had no significant difference among all light treatments. Specific leaf area (SLA) under O and G treatments was greater than that under the other respective irradiations of LEDs, while that of RB treatment showed the lowest SLA [27].
The dry weight of the plant under LED-1 and LED-2 supplemental lightings increased Table 2 in comparison with HPS lights. This increase in plant dry weight was mainly related to differences in light absorption, which in turn were mainly due to differences in leaf area Figure 2C rather than other morphological parameters. The combination of B and R LED lighting increased total dry matter [27], photosynthetic pigment content, stomata number, and reasonable photosynthate distribution in cherry tomato seedlings [28].
The results support the finding that decreased photosynthesis in infected tissues is in part due to decreased levels of chlorophyll [29]. The contents of Chl and carotenoid in leaves of plants under different irradiations of LEDs were shown to have no significant differences (Table 3). Compared with HPS control treatment, the contents of Chla, Chlb, Chl (a + b), and carotenoids in leaves of plants with LED-1 and LED-2 treatments showed a tendency to be barely higher than those with the other irradiations of LEDs (Figure 3). The contents in the leaves of the HPS control treatment were shown to be lower. Chla/b showed a tendency to have no significant difference in the order of the light irradiations of all treatments. Carotenoid contents statistically differ between the treatments. The leaf color of the plants grown under the irradiations of LED-1 and LED-2 was dark green, while that grown under the irradiations of HPS control was bright green (Figure 3). In experiments with fodder cabbage and sugar beet, the influences were tested which restrict the finding of a uniform linear dependence between the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate [30]. The results of our experiment also confirm the above conclusions. Not significantly, but still, a higher content of Chla and Chl b was found in the leaves of tomato seedlings irradiated with LED-1 and LED-2 ( Table 3). The contents of Chl and carotenoid in leaves of plants under different irradiations of LEDs were shown to have no significant differences (Table 2). Compared with C treatment, the contents of Chla, Chlb, Chl (a + b), and carotenoids in leaves of plants with RBG showed a tendency to be barely higher than those with the other irradiations of LEDs. The contents in the leaves of R and O treatments were shown to be lower. Chla/b showed a tendency to have a significant difference in the order of the light irradiations of RB, R, G, B, C, RBG and O. Leaf color of the plants grown under the irradiations of C, B, RB, and RBG was dark green, while that grown under the irradiations of R, O and G was yellowish-green [31].
Carotenoid is the auxiliary pigment of antenna Chls in chloroplasts and can help Chl to receive light energy [32]. The carotenoid content in leaves of lettuce plants under different light irradiations showed to be high in the order of white, yellow, blue, and red [33]. In the present study, the carotenoid content of cherry tomato leaves under RBG was the highest, and that under RB, B, G and C showed no significant difference, while that under O and R was the lowest ( Table 3). The difference between the result and Table 3 may be due to qualitative and quantitative differences between various spectral irradiations and plant species [34].
Many experiments have been carried out in recent years. Scientists from different countries have studied the effect of light spectra on the growth, productivity, and physiology of tomato plants. The results were conflicting, but all researchers confirm that tomatoes need a combination of R and B light [35]. Light qualities regulate plant growth and development via various photoreceptors that stimulate signal transduction systems to change plant morphology. In this study, the morphological and photosynthetic characteristics of tomato seedlings grown in the greenhouse were significantly affected by light qualities. The results showed that plants grown under LED lights with nanoparticle coating had better characteristics and improved plant growth parameters.
In this study, we also found that plant height reached a maximum under LED lights irradiation than under HPS lamps. This might account for a certain level of decline in the tomato leaf photosynthetic rate, which resulted in a reduced accumulation of photosynthetic products. The difference in orientation of illumination used in previous studies and the present study should also be considered, and it would require further detailed research.
The larger and wider leaf allowed more light interception, which may have led to a significant increase in biomass. The results showed that plants are grown under LED-1 and LED-2 irradiation had a higher photosynthetic rate and improved plant growth parameters. We also assume that responses of plant growth to light qualities might not only be related to species of tomato but also the growth period and light intensity. This needs to be further studied. The larger leaf allowed greater light interception, which may have led to a certain increase in biomass.
Starch is the basic carbohydrate reserve that accumulates in the chloroplasts of photosynthesizing leaves. Thus, further study of starch content in tomato seedlings grown under LEDs irradiation is required. Due to the limitations in special laboratory equipment, we couldn't determine the sucrose cleavage of samples. Further studies are needed to describe the effects of selected LED light qualities in tomato fruit qualities during storage and transportation, and they are under progress.

Conclusions
Current greenhouse crop-production systems rely heavily on supplemental electric lighting to improve the light environment and to promote plant growth, especially at northern latitudes. High-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps have been widely used to provide supplemental photosynthetic lighting in greenhouses. HPS lamps emit primarily a yel- Light qualities regulate plant growth and development via various photoreceptors that stimulate signal transduction systems to change plant morphology. In this study, the morphological and photosynthetic characteristics of tomato seedlings grown in the greenhouse were significantly affected by light qualities. The results showed that plants grown under LED lights with nanoparticle coating had better characteristics and improved plant growth parameters.
In this study, we also found that plant height reached a maximum under LED lights irradiation than under HPS lamps. This might account for a certain level of decline in the tomato leaf photosynthetic rate, which resulted in a reduced accumulation of photosynthetic products. The difference in orientation of illumination used in previous studies and the present study should also be considered, and it would require further detailed research.
The larger and wider leaf allowed more light interception, which may have led to a significant increase in biomass. The results showed that plants are grown under LED-1 and LED-2 irradiation had a higher photosynthetic rate and improved plant growth parameters. We also assume that responses of plant growth to light qualities might not only be related to species of tomato but also the growth period and light intensity. This needs to be further studied. The larger leaf allowed greater light interception, which may have led to a certain increase in biomass.
Starch is the basic carbohydrate reserve that accumulates in the chloroplasts of photosynthesizing leaves. Thus, further study of starch content in tomato seedlings grown under LEDs irradiation is required. Due to the limitations in special laboratory equipment, we couldn't determine the sucrose cleavage of samples. Further studies are needed to describe the effects of selected LED light qualities in tomato fruit qualities during storage and transportation, and they are under progress.

Conclusions
Current greenhouse crop-production systems rely heavily on supplemental electric lighting to improve the light environment and to promote plant growth, especially at northern latitudes. High-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps have been widely used to provide supplemental photosynthetic lighting in greenhouses. HPS lamps emit primarily a yellowto-orange-biased emission spectrum and are typically positioned high above the canopy to reduce the impact of radiant heat emission.
Light quality is known to be an important factor that regulates the morphogenesis and photosynthetic characteristics of plants. In greenhouse tomato production, supple-Sustainability 2021, 13, 9426 9 of 11 mental lighting can be used to provide sufficient light energy for plants. In greenhouse tomato production, the quantity of light reaching the lower canopy is less than the top with the permeation of light, and the lower canopy of tomato plantsis often shaded by the neighbouring plants. It is therefore not surprising that light is becoming a main limiting environmental factor in greenhouse tomato production, as it affects photosynthesis, yield, and quality of plants. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are considered suitable supplementary lighting to improve the yield and quality of plants. In our study, tomato seedlings grown under greenhouse conditions demonstrated strong morphological plasticity when exposed to different LED light qualities. We studied the effect of LED lights with nanoparticle coating, which consists of an LED irradiation system and nutrient solution supply system on the growth and quality of tomato seedlings cultivated in the greenhouse. The results of our study suggested that proper light quality effectively regulated photosynthetic capacity and plant growth. Tomato seedlings grown under the experimental supplemental lighting were shorter than those of traditional HPS lights. Although stem diameters of plants cultivated under three different supplemental lightings were at the same level on the 12th day, but from the 19th day till the end of the experiment (33rd day) LED-1 and LED-2 demonstrated a better effect on stem diameter than HPS light. Morphological parameters such as dry weight, fresh weight, leaf area, and health index of tomato seedlings grown under the experimental alternative light sources (LED-1 and LED-2) were also higher than that of those cultivated under the traditional HPS lights. The interactive effects of light quality and temperature on plant morphology and growth are hardly known. Further study is needed to identify the dependence of thermo-sensitivity of plant height on light quality. However, the study indicated that stem elongation is related to root growth and photosynthetic pigments. The energy of a photon depends on light wavelength, and blue photons have more energy but drive the photosynthetic reaction less efficiently than red photons because their high energy is not fully utilized [33]. The current results suggested that higher temperature combined with LED-1 and LED-2 creates indisputable optimal regimes for tomato seedling growth, but a combination of lower temperature and LED light regime requires further attention in plant production. Light-induced biomass allocation changed between vegetative and reproductive structures during plant growth and development. Based on the data obtained as a result of the comparative and statistical analysis, we can conclude that LED lights with nanoparticle coating can be applied in greenhouses as a source of supplemental lighting: leaf area can improve light absorption, and stem diameter can improve the growth of tomato seedling and further crop productivity. We conclude that light spectral properties affect biomass allocation, and such responses involve morphological and physiological changes in tomato plants.