Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Usage and Users
3.1. Usage Patterns
3.2. User Characteristics
4. Health Impacts
4.1. Injuries
4.2. Perceived Safety
4.3. Physical Activity
5. Environmental Impacts
5.1. Comparison with Other Transport Modes
5.2. Impact Drivers and Possible Improvements
6. Policy Issues
6.1. Legal Framework
6.2. Safety
6.3. Parking and Street Design
6.4. Data Sharing and Privacy
7. Key Findings and Avenues for Future Research
7.1. Key Findings
7.2. Avenues for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bloom, M.B.; Noorzad, A.; Lin, C.; Little, M.; Lee, E.Y.; Margulies, D.R.; Torbati, S.S. Standing electric scooter injuries: Impact on a community. Am. J. Surg. 2021, 221, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitt, H.; Curl, A. The early days of shared micromobility: A social practices approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 86, 102779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, J.; Schellong, D. How E-Scooters Can Win a Place in Urban Transport. BCG Global. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/e-scooters-can-win-place-in-urban-transport (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Shibayama, T.; Emberger, G. New mobility services: Taxonomy, innovation and the role of ICTs. Transp. Policy 2020, 98, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Boennec, R.; Nicolaï, I.; Da Costa, P. Assessing 50 innovative mobility offers in low-density areas: A French application using a two-step decision-aid method. Transp. Policy 2019, 83, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santacreu, A.; Yannis, G.; de Saint Leon, O.; Crist, P. Safe Micromobility. 2020. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/1696177 (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- McQueen, M.; Abou-Zeid, G.; MacArthur, J.; Clifton, K. Transportation Transformation: Is Micromobility Making a Macro Impact on Sustainability? J. Plan. Lit. 2020, 36, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campisi, T.; Akgün, N.; Tesoriere, G. An ordered logit model for predicting the willingness of renting micro mobility in urban shared streets: A case study in Palermo, Italy. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 796–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A. Shared Micromoblity Policy Toolkit: Docked and Dockless Bike and Scooter Sharing. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley. 2019. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00k897b5 (accessed on 10 June 2020).
- Hall, M. Bird Scooters Flying Around Town. Santa Monica Daily Press. Available online: https://www.smdp.com/bird-scooters-flying-around-town/162647 (accessed on 11 May 2020).
- Clewlow, R. The Micro-Mobility Revolution: The Introduction and Adoption of Electric Scooters in the United States. Populus. 2018. Available online: https://www.populus.ai/micro-mobility-2018-july (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- NACTO. Shared Micromobility in the U.S. 2018. 2019. Available online: https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NACTO_Shared-Micromobility-in-2018_Web.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2020).
- de Bortoli, A.; Christoforou, Z. Consequential LCA for territorial and multimodal transportation policies: Method and application to the free-floating e-scooter disruption in Paris. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laa, B.; Leth, U. Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 89, 102874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreau, H.; Meux, L.D.J.D.; Zeller, V.; D’Ans, P.; Ruwet, C.; Achten, W.M. Dockless E-Scooter: A Green Solution for Mobility? Comparative Case Study between Dockless E-Scooters, Displaced Transport, and Personal E-Scooters. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mitchell, G.; Tsao, H.; Randell, T.; Marks, J.; Mackay, P. Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2019, 31, 930–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, R.; Zhang, X.; Kondor, D.; Santi, P.; Ratti, C. Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020, 81, 101483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toll, M. Bien Venidos to Lime Electric Scooters as They Expand into Latin America. Electrek. Available online: https://electrek.co/2019/06/26/lime-electric-scooters-expand-latin-america/ (accessed on 12 February 2020).
- NUMO. Micromobility Map. Available online: https://www.numo.global/new-mobility-atlas (accessed on 12 July 2020).
- NACTO. Shared Micromobility in the U.S. 2019. 2020. Available online: https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020bikesharesnapshot.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2020).
- Gössling, S. Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 79, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Button, K.; Frye, H.; Reaves, D. Economic regulation and E-scooter networks in the USA. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 84, 100973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schellong, D.; Sadek, P.; Schaetzberger, C.; Barrack, T. The Promise and Pitfalls of E-Scooter Sharing. BCG Global. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/promise-pitfalls-e-scooter-sharing (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Laa, B.; Emberger, G. Bike sharing: Regulatory options for conflicting interests—Case study Vienna. Transp. Policy 2020, 98, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milakis, D.; Gedhardt, L.; Ehebrecht, D.; Lenz, B. Is micro-mobility sustainable? An overview of implications for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity and subjective wellbeing. In Handbook of Sustainable Transport; Curtis, C., Ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; pp. 180–189. Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781789900460/9781789900460.00030.xml (accessed on 22 February 2021).
- Fishman, E.; Cherry, C. E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transp. Rev. 2015, 36, 72–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, J.F.; Silva, C.; e Sá, F.M. Empirical evidence on the impacts of bikesharing: A literature review. Transp. Rev. 2020, 41, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Hern, S.; Estgfaeller, N. A scientometric review of powered micromobility. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şengül, B.; Mostofi, H. Impacts of E-Micromobility on the Sustainability of Urban Transportation—A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, O.; Swiderski, J.; Hicks, J.; Teoman, D.; Buehler, R. Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Wee, B.; Banister, D. How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transp. Rev. 2016, 36, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Denscombe, M. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 2nd ed.; Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Degele, J.; Gorr, A.; Haas, K.; Kormann, D.; Krauss, S.; Lipinski, P.; Tenbih, M.; Koppenhoefer, C.; Fauser, J.; Hertweck, D. Identifying e-scooter sharing customer segments using clustering. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany, 17–20 June 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, G. Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020, 79, 101418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Z.; Younes, H.; Erdoğan, S.; Wu, J. Exploratory Analysis of Real-Time E-Scooter Trip Data in Washington, D.C. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2020, 2674, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siman-Tov, M.; Radomislensky, I.; Israel Trauma Group; Peleg, K. The casualties from electric bike and motorized scooter road accidents. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2017, 18, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikka, N.; Vila, C.; Stratton, M.; Ghassemi, M.; Pourmand, A. Sharing the sidewalk: A case of E-scooter related pedestrian injury. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1807.e5–1807.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Civity Management Consultants. E-scooters in Germany. A Data-Driven Contribution to the Ongoing Debate. 2019. Available online: https://scooters.civity.de/en (accessed on 12 June 2020).
- 6t-Bureau De Recherche. Uses and Users of Free-Floating Electric Scooters in France. Available online: https://6-t.co/en/free-floating-escooters-france/ (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Bai, S.; Jiao, J. Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments: A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behav. Soc. 2020, 20, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, T. Micromobility Potential in the US, UK and Germany. 2019. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/1650977 (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Mathew, J.; Liu, M.; Seeder, S.; Li, H.; Bullock, D. Analysis of e-scooter trips and their temporal usage patterns. Inst. Transp. Eng. 2019, 89, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Noland, R.B. Trip patterns and revenue of shared e-scooters in Louisville, Kentucky. Transp. Find. 2019, 7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinoza, W.; Howard, M.; Lane, J.; Van Hentenryck, P. Shared e-scooters: Business, pleasure, or transit? arXiv 2019, arXiv:1910.05807. [Google Scholar]
- McKenzie, G. Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019, 78, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, G. Shared micro-mobility patterns as measures of city similarity: Position paper. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computing with Multifaceted Movement Data—MOVE’19, Chicago, IL, USA, 5 November 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caspi, O.; Smart, M.J.; Noland, R.B. Spatial associations of dockless shared e-scooter usage. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 86, 102396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curl, A.; Fitt, H. Same same, but different? Cycling and e-scootering in a rapidly changing urban transport landscape. N. Z. Geogr. 2020, 76, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, R.L.; Branion-Calles, M.; Nelson, T.A. To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pr. 2020, 139, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bieliński, T.; Agnieszka, W. Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, N.; Blazejewski, L.; Sherriff, G. The rise of micromobilities at tourism destinations. J. Tour. Futur. 2020, 6, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Chow, J.Y.J.; Yoon, G.; He, B.Y. Forecasting e-scooter competition with direct and access trips by mode and distance in New York City. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1908.08127. [Google Scholar]
- Alwani, M.; Jones, A.J.; Sandelski, M.; Bandali, E.; Lancaster, B.; Sim, M.W.; Shipchandler, T.; Ting, J. Facing Facts: Facial Injuries from Stand-up Electric Scooters. Cureus 2020, 12, e6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Badeau, A.; Carman, C.; Newman, M.; Steenblik, J.; Carlson, M.; Madsen, T. Emergency department visits for electric scooter-related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1531–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, L.M.; Williams, E.; Brown, C.V.; Emigh, B.J.; Bansal, V.; Badiee, J.; Checchi, K.D.; Castillo, E.M.; Doucet, J. The e-merging e-pidemic of e-scooters. Trauma Surg. Acute Care Open 2019, 4, e000337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trivedi, T.K.; Liu, C.; Antonio, A.L.M.; Wheaton, N.; Kreger, V.; Yap, A.; Schriger, D.; Elmore, J.G. Injuries Associated with Standing Electric Scooter Use. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e187381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipovsky, C. Free-floating electric scooters: Representation in French mainstream media. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haworth, N.L.; Schramm, A. Illegal and risky riding of electric scooters in Brisbane. Med. J. Aust. 2019, 211, 412–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allem, J.-P.; Majmundar, A. Are electric scooters promoted on social media with safety in mind? A case study on Bird’s Instagram. Prev. Med. Rep. 2019, 13, 62–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayhew, L.J.; Bergin, C.; Schaetzberger, C.; Hill, J. Impact of e-scooter injuries on emergency department imaging. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 63, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berge, S.H. Kickstarting Micromobility—A Pilot Study on E-Scooters (1721/2019, 4763); Institute of Transport Economics: Oslo, Norway, 2019; Available online: https://www.toi.no/getfile.php/1350932/Publikasjoner/TØI%20rapporter/2019/1721-2019/1721-2019-elektronisk.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Tice, P.C. Micromobility and the Built Environment. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2019, 63, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardt, C.; Bogenberger, K. Usage of e-Scooters in Urban Environments. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 37, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, D.; Mintrom, C.; Robinson, K.; Thomas, R. Shared micromobility: The influence of regulation on travel mode choice. N. Z. Geogr. 2020, 76, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glenn, J.; Bluth, M.; Christianson, M.; Pressley, J.; Taylor, A.; Macfarlane, G.S.; Chaney, R.A. Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tillemann, L.; Feasley, L. Let’s Count the Ways E-Scooters Could Save the City. Wired. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/e-scooter-micromobility-infographics-cost-emissions/ (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Neven, A.; Verstrael, A.; Janssen, A.; Dendale, P. Transport as a new avenue for CV prevention in city dwellers: How to kill two birds with one stone? Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 816–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollingsworth, J.; Copeland, B.; Johnson, J. Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 084031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lime. Year-End Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.li.me/hubfs/Lime_Year-End%20Report_2018.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2020).
- Martinez-Navarro, A.; Cloquell-Ballester, V.-A.; Segui-Chilet, S. Photovoltaic Electric Scooter Charger Dock for the Development of Sustainable Mobility in Urban Environments. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 169486–169495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finck, M.; Lamping, M.; Moscon, V.; Richter, H. Smart Urban Mobility as a Regulatory Challenge. In Smart Urban Mobility: Law, Regulation, and Policy; Finck, M., Lamping, M., Moscon, V., Richter, H., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartling, H. Urban mobilities and local regulation: Transportation challenges and promise of the sharing economy. In Handbook of the Sharing Economy; Belk, R.W., Eckhardt, G.M., Bardhi, F., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; pp. 230–241. Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788110532/9781788110532.00027.xml (accessed on 19 February 2021).
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A.; Zohdy, I. Shared mobility resources: Helping to understand emerging shifts in transportation. Policy Briefs 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turoń, K.; Czech, P. The concept of rules and recommendations for riding shared and private e-scooters in the road network in the light of global problems. In Modern Traffic Engineering in the System Approach to the Development of Traffic Networks; Macioszek, E., Sierpiński, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giles, C. When Can I Ride n E-Scooter Legally? BBC News. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48106617 (accessed on 4 January 2021).
- Florek-Klęsk, D. Electric Scooters and the Safety of Road Users—Selected Legal Aspects. Mod. Manag. Rev. 2019, 24, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.; Klein, N.J.; Thigpen, C.; Williams, N. Impeding access: The frequency and characteristics of improper scooter, bike, and car parking. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 4, 100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Transportation for America. Shared Micromobility Playbook. 2018. Available online: https://playbook.t4america.org/ (accessed on 5 January 2021).
- Ruhrort, L. Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility? Sustainability 2020, 12, 8253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noussan, M.; Hafner, M.; Tagliapietra, S. The Future of Transport Between Digitalization and Decarbonization: Trends, Strategies and Effects on Energy Consumption; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riggs, W.; Kawashima, M. Exploring Best Practice for Municipal E-Scooter Policy in the United States. 2020. Available online: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3512725 (accessed on 25 November 2020).
- Laker, L. Welcome, Watch or Ban: How Should Cities Deal with Electric Scooters? The Guardian. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/jun/18/welcome-watch-or-ban-how-should-cities-deal-with-electric-scooters (accessed on 9 October 2020).
- Janssen, C.; Barbour, W.; Hafkenschiel, E.; Abkowitz, M.; Philip, C.; Work, D.B. City-to-City and Temporal Assessment of Peer City Scooter Policy. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2020, 2674, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Lee, K.Y.; Yang, S.-B.; Chang, L.Y. Linking Privacy Concerns for Traceable Information and Information Privacy Protective Responses on Electric Scooter Sharing Platforms. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oeschger, G.; Carroll, P.; Caulfield, B. Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 89, 102628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseinzadeh, A.; Algomaiah, M.; Kluger, R.; Li, Z. E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 66, 102624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, S. Some Gender Equality and Equity Planning Cases in Urban Planning in Malmö, or How I Became a Transport Feminist. In Gendering Smart Mobilities; Priya, U.T., Christensen, H.R., Levin, L., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A.; Chan, N.; Bansal, A. Sharing Strategies: Carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera, A.; Cacciari, J. Living with fewer cars: Review and challenges on household demotorization. Transp. Rev. 2020, 40, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hensher, D.; Mulley, C.; Ho, C.; Wong, Y.; Smith, G.; Nelson, J. Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Past, Present and Future; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, A.Y.; Miranda-Moreno, L.; Clewlow, R.; Sun, L. Trend or Fad? Deciphering the Enablers of Micromobility in the U.S. SAE International. 2019. Available online: https://www.sae.org/binaries/content/assets/cm/content/topics/micromobility/sae-micromobility-trend-or-fad-report.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2020).
- The Economist. Lessons from the Fall of China’s Bike-Sharing Pioneer. Available online: https://www.economist.com/business/2019/01/26/lessons-from-the-fall-of-chinas-bike-sharing-pioneer (accessed on 11 January 2021).
Topic | Source Type | North America | Europe | Oceania | Asia | Global |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uses and users | Peer-reviewed | Bai and Jiao, 2020; Caspi et al., 2020; James et al., 2019; Mathew et al., 2019; McKenzie, 2019a, 2020, 2019b; Noland, 2019; Sanders et al., 2020; Zou et al., 2020 | Hardt and Bogenberger, 2019; Laa and Leth, 2020; Ruhrort, 2020 | Curl and Fitt, 2020; Fitt and Curl, 2020 | Zhu et al., 2020 | Davies et al., 2020 |
Not peer-reviewed | Chang et al., 2019; Clewlow, 2018; Espinoza et al., 2019; Hall, 2017; Lee et al., 2019; NACTO, 2019, 2020 | 6t-bureau de recherche, 2019; Berge, 2019; Civity Management Consultants, 2019; Giles, 2020 | NUMO, 2020; Lime, 2018; Tillemann and Feasley, 2018 | |||
Health impacts | Peer-reviewed | Allem and Majmundar, 2019; Alwani et al., 2020; Badeau et al., 2019; Bloom et al., 2020; Glenn et al., 2020; James et al., 2019; Kobayashi et al., 2019; Sikka et al., 2019; Trivedi et al., 2019 | Fitt and Curl, 2020; Haworth and Schramm, 2019; Mayhew et al., 2019; Mitchell et al., 2019 | Neven et al., 2020; Santacreu et al., 2020 | ||
Not peer-reviewed | ||||||
Environmental impacts | Peer-reviewed | Hollingsworth et al., 2019 | de Bortoli and Christoforou, 2020; Martínez-Navarro et al., 2020; Moreau et al., 2020 | |||
Not peer-reviewed | Berge, 2019 | Rose and Schellong, 2020 | ||||
Policy issues | Peer-reviewed | Bartling, 2019; Brown et al., 2020; Button et al., 2020; Hollingsworth et al., 2019; James et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2020; Noussan et al., 2020; Riggs and Kawashima, 2020; Zou et al., 2020 | de Bortoli and Christoforou, 2020; Florek-Klęsk, 2019; Lipovsky, 2020 | Haworth and Schramm, 2019; Lo et al., 2020 | Zhu et al., 2020 | Gössling, 2020; Li et al., 2020; Santacreu et al., 2020; Shaheen et al., 2017; Shaheen et al., 2020; Shaheen and Cohen, 2019 Tice, 2019; Turoń and Czech, 2020 |
Not peer-reviewed | NACTO, 2020; Transportation for America, 2018 | Laker, 2019; Reed, 2019; Schellong et al., 2019 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bozzi, A.D.; Aguilera, A. Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168676
Bozzi AD, Aguilera A. Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):8676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168676
Chicago/Turabian StyleBozzi, Alberica Domitilla, and Anne Aguilera. 2021. "Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service" Sustainability 13, no. 16: 8676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168676
APA StyleBozzi, A. D., & Aguilera, A. (2021). Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service. Sustainability, 13(16), 8676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168676