Next Article in Journal
Social and Ecological Dimensions of Urban Conservation Grasslands and Their Management through Prescribed Burning and Woody Vegetation Removal
Next Article in Special Issue
Clay-Based Products Sustainable Development: Some Applications
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Academic Achievement School-Age Children from Southern Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Performance Evaluation of a Desiccant Air Handling System to Maximize Solar Thermal Energy Use in a Hot and Humid Climate
Article

Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(8), 3460; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083460
Received: 14 March 2020 / Revised: 14 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 23 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Application of Renewable Energy in Sustainable Architecture)
Energy consumption in public buildings increased drastically over the last decade. Significant policy actions towards the promotion of energy efficiency in the building sector have been developed involving sustainable low-CO2-emission technologies. This paper presents the results of an economic–environmental valuation of a standard energy retrofit project for a public building in a Mediterranean area, integrating a life-cycle assessment (LCA) into the traditional economic–financial evaluation pattern. The study results show that simple retrofit of sustainable low-CO2-emission strategies such as wooden double-glazed windows, organic external wall insulation systems, and green roofs can reduce energy needs for heating and cooling by 58.5% and 33.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the implementation of an LCA highlights that the use of sustainable materials reduces the building’s carbon footprint index by 54.1% after retrofit compared to standard materials, thus providing an additional increase in the socio-environmental–economic–financial results of 18%. Some proposals are made about the accounting of the replacement costs and the residual value as requested in the logic of life-cycle cost (that is the economic extension of the LCA), namely concerning the method to take into account the replacement costs and the residual value. The economic calculation highlights the fundamental role played by tax benefits supporting the building energy retrofit, also in temperate climate zones, thus allowing the creation of environmental benefits in addition to remarkable cost savings. View Full-Text
Keywords: envelope energy efficiency; life-cycle assessment; green public procurement; minimum environmental criteria; CO2 emission reduction; cost-effectiveness analysis; financial sustainability envelope energy efficiency; life-cycle assessment; green public procurement; minimum environmental criteria; CO2 emission reduction; cost-effectiveness analysis; financial sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Trovato, M.R.; Nocera, F.; Giuffrida, S. Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083460

AMA Style

Trovato MR, Nocera F, Giuffrida S. Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trovato, Maria R., Francesco Nocera, and Salvatore Giuffrida. 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings" Sustainability 12, no. 8: 3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083460

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop