Next Article in Journal
A Model for Managing Packaging in the Product Life Cycle in the Automotive Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Recyclability Potential of Induction-Healable Porous Asphalt Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Harnessing Remote Sensing Derived Sea Level Rise Models to Assess Cultural Heritage Vulnerability: A Case Study from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interpretation of the Magnetic Field Signals Emitted by Encoded Asphalt Pavement Materials
Review

A Critical Review of Sensors for the Continuous Monitoring of Smart and Sustainable Railway Infrastructures

Laboratory of Construction Engineering, University of Granada, C/Severo Ochoa s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9428; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229428
Received: 8 October 2020 / Revised: 4 November 2020 / Accepted: 9 November 2020 / Published: 12 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Solutions for Sustainable Transport Infrastructure)
Real-time and continuous monitoring through smart sensors is considered to be the evolution of traditional track testing, enabling the earlier detection of the main failure modes that degrade railway tracks. Through carrying out preventive maintenance operations, infrastructure resources may be optimized, leading to smarter and more sustainable infrastructure. For this reason, under the larger goal of creating a synergy with various types of sensors for railway tracks, this article presents a critical review on the different, currently available sensors for smart and continuous monitoring. Specifically, the most appropriate monitoring technologies for each of the main railway track failure modes have been assessed and identified, thus deriving the advantages and capacities of each solution. Furthermore, this review presents some of the main experiences carried out to date in literature by using sensor technologies, such as strain gauges, piezoelectric sensors, fiber-optics, geophones and accelerometers. These technologies have proven to offer appropriate characteristics and accuracy for the continuous monitoring of a railway track’s structural state, being capable of measuring different parameters, such as deflections, deformations, stresses or accelerations that would permit the technical tracking of various forms of degradation. View Full-Text
Keywords: real-time monitoring; rail track sensor; smart infrastructure; structural health monitoring; review real-time monitoring; rail track sensor; smart infrastructure; structural health monitoring; review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Castillo-Mingorance, J.M.; Sol-Sánchez, M.; Moreno-Navarro, F.; Rubio-Gámez, M.C. A Critical Review of Sensors for the Continuous Monitoring of Smart and Sustainable Railway Infrastructures. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229428

AMA Style

Castillo-Mingorance JM, Sol-Sánchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez MC. A Critical Review of Sensors for the Continuous Monitoring of Smart and Sustainable Railway Infrastructures. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22):9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castillo-Mingorance, Juan M., Miguel Sol-Sánchez, Fernando Moreno-Navarro, and María C. Rubio-Gámez 2020. "A Critical Review of Sensors for the Continuous Monitoring of Smart and Sustainable Railway Infrastructures" Sustainability 12, no. 22: 9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229428

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop