Sustainability of the Artisanal Fishery in Northern Chile: A Case Study of Caleta Pisagua

The Humboldt Current, one of the most productive waters in the world, flows along the Chilean coast with high primary production level. However, living marine resources in these waters are declining due to overexploitation and other anthropogenic and environmental factors. It has been reported that deploying artificial reefs in coastal waters can improve the production of benthic resources. To ensure the sustainability of coastal fisheries in northern Chile this study aims to investigate fishermen’s perceptions on deploying artificial reefs and propose future management measures using Caleta Pisagua as a case study. Interviews of artisanal fishermen regarding four aspects: fishermen profile, fishing activity, resources, and artificial reefs were conducted. Results showed that most fishermen favored the implementation of artificial reefs within the Areas of Management and Exploitation of Benthic Resources (AMERBs). In addition, deploying artificial reefs appears to be socio-economically necessary for the artisanal fishermen whose livelihood is being affected by the overexploitation of coastal fish and because hard substrates essential for benthic resources are in short supply within this administration area. It is recommended that criteria for the deployment of artificial reefs as well as specific management plans for main and secondary species should be developed.


Introduction
The Chilean fishery system comprises two sectors: 1.the industrial or large-scale fishery sector, and, 2. the artisanal or small-scale fishery sector. The former includes fishing vessels larger than 18 m in length that by law must operate outside the first five nautical miles from the coast. The latter includes fishing vessels of up to 15 m in length that operate within five nautical miles of coastal waters. The latter includes various types of artisanal fishermen and some of them exploit marine resources for which they have annual quotas approved by the Under-Secretariat for Fisheries and Aquaculture; and others (the minority) with licenses to act on different marine resources [1]. Artisanal fishermen are organized regionally (a scheme applied for most of the economic activities of Chile) and are entitled to operate only in the one particular region in which they have registered. In addition, benthic fishery regulations include quotas by region and species, which are allocated among the groups included in the Artisanal Fisheries Register [2].
The HCLME off the Chilean coast is one of the most productive ecosystems in the world with high primary production levels [24][25][26]. These natural conditions are particularly ideal for the implementation and development of a system that could capture this rich environmental organic carbon and transform it into marine animal biomass for human consumption. Given this scenario, the implementation of ad hoc ARs within the HCLME is an excellent marine development option to increase the production of benthic resources along the Chilean coastal waters. ARs could allow for the replenishment of the local benthic (sea-bottom) life by providing new substrate to larvae and adults of epi-benthos (hard-bottom loving organisms, both macro-algae, and invertebrates), and associated demersal fish [27].
Many definitions exist about ARs depending on their use or purpose [28,29]; Goldschmid and Yip [30] summarized the pros and cons of ARs. The pros include (1) providing shelter, calm waters, and influencing water currents so that fish save energy while swimming against the current; (2) attracting smaller organisms, which are vital sources of food for different marine species; (3) serving as visual reference points for fish that forage away from the reef and increase over the entire reef area, which can host a larger number of reef fish; (4) enhancing existing rough bottom habitat and developing quality fishing grounds close to accessible areas by properly constructed and buoyed ARs; and (5) increasing fisher populations in the harbor due to AR construction leads to an increase in fish harvesting [31].
Although ARs built upon modern concepts usually do not have many negative impacts, problems may occur if they are poorly designed and deployed. Nevertheless, the cons are summarized as follows: (1) presence of pollutants in the building material and/or substrate, (2) interference with fishing activity if AR areas are not properly marked, and (3) artificial reefs would have to be built on a case-by-case basis due to the degree of difference in the bottom condition (Yozzo et al. [32] in Friend and Cummins [31]).
There has been a pilot project on AR deployment in Caleta Pisagua in 2012 and 2013, which concluded that the AR deployment can increase the production and biodiversity of benthic resources (https://www. conicyt.cl/wp-content/themes/fondef/encuentra_proyectos/PROYECTO/07/I/D07I1032.html). However, fishermen's perceptions on such deployment have never been studied. Thus, to ensure the future sustainability of artisanal fishery on benthic resources, this study aims to learn fishermen's opinions on deploying ARs in northern Chile Caleta Pisagua AMERB, using artisanal fisherman interviews.

Data Collection
Literature reviews and artisanal fishermen interviews were used in this study to investigate the fishermen's opinions on AR deployment in the Caleta Pisagua AMERB. Literature reviews addressed two main subjects: (1) the collection of information on social and fishery-related aspects of Caleta Pisagua and the Pisagua AMERB, and (2) collecting information on the implementation of ARs. Official yearly reports (National Fishery Service), fishery research project reports, and scientific literature were used to extract needed data on species and species-specific landing data. Intensive search in books, scientific journals, workshop reports, and expert presentations was conducted to summarize the legislation and implementation of ARs and on the pros and cons of AR deployment.

Interviews of Caleta Pisagua Fishermen
Artisanal fishermen in this area include boat fishermen, shellfish divers, shore collectors, and sailor helpers, all of whom are organized into a union and entitled to an AMERB with an area of 155.4 ha where approximately 61% of this area consists of soft (sandy) substrate. All fishery statistics related to Caleta Pisagua are included in the total harvest of all AMERBs, and both are included in the Tarapacá Region landings [33]. There are 23 AMERBs in this region with a combined area of 1665.5 ha; 9.3% of this area is included in the Pisagua management area.
The survey was conducted using personal interviews with 30 out of 35 artisanal fishermen from the Caleta Pisagua area between July and August 2016. The questionnaire consisted of four main parts. The first part included age, activity, fishing experience, and other information; the second part included the activity, transit time to the fishing zone, type of fishing gear used, time, and diving depth; the third part was the resource profile that includes the main species, the secondary species, and species seldom to be harvested; and the fourth part was related to the personal position with respect to artificial reef technology (Interview questionnaire can be found in Appendix A).
The questionnaire was designed to collect the information necessary for further analyses based on examples from the bibliography such as those made by the National Statistics Institute (INE) of Chile [34]. The responses to questionnaires from the artisanal fishermen of the Caleta Pisagua were analyzed by using SPSS [35]. A Chi-Square test was used to examine the homogeneity of distribution among groups.

Results
The landings of marine fisheries in Chile from 1950 to 2016 peaked in 1994 at 7,558,571 tons, and decreased thereafter to the lowest value of 1,886,474 tons in 2014. However, mollusk landings and other species have increased due to the development of aquaculture in southern Chile [36].

Catch Composition in Caleta Pisagua
There were 60 species caught by the fisheries in the Chilean AMERBs [37]; 54 of these species (90%) were found within the boundaries of Caleta Pisagua, including the AMERB. Of these 54 species, 82% correspond to benthic species that require hard substrate as refuge in one or more of their life stages (Table 1) [38].There were six main target benthic resources in Caleta Pisagua: the "locate" snail (Thais chocolata), the northern octopus (Octopus mimus), the crab (Romaleon polyodon), the sea urchin (Loxechinus albus), the Chinese hat limpet (Fissurella sp.), the "loco" snail (Concholepas concholepas), and various species of macro-algae. However, annual landings of these species fluctuated largely from 2003 to 2016 ( Figure 1) [39]. Since all of these species have high value and great market potential, each species has its own regulation and quota established according to the management plan proposed by special expert groups and instituted by the Sub-Secretariat of Fisheries. Secondary resources are Pyura chilensis ("piure"), Austromegabalanus pssitacus ("picoroco"), mussels ("cholga") (Aulacomya atra, Mytilus chilensis), and "choro" (Choromytilus chorus) ( Table 1).

Interview Results
The results of interviews of the Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen are summarized as follows: The age of the Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen ranged from 18 to over 60 years old; this age structure was biased (Chi-Square test, p < 0.05) as 30% of the fishermen were between ages of 50 and

Interview Results
The results of interviews of the Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen are summarized as follows:

Fishermen Profile
The age of the Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen ranged from 18 to over 60 years old; this age structure was biased (Chi-Square test, p < 0.05) as 30% of the fishermen were between ages of 50 and 59, 26.7% were older than age 60, 23.3% were between ages 40 and 49, and only 13.3% were between ages 30 and 39 and 6.7% were between ages 18 and 29.
Forty percent of the interviewees had more than 30 years of fishing experience, 26.7% of them had 25-30 years of experience, 26.7% had 15-24 years of experience, and only 6.6% had 5-14 years of experience.

Activity Profile
With regard to the type of job, five groups were identified, namely, divers (50%), shore collectors and seafood pickers (10%), helpers (13.3%), and fish catchers (23.3%). Regarding to the worker type, only 13.3% work alone and 86.7% of the interviewees do not work alone. Those who work alone corresponded to actual fish catchers.
Three sets of working hours were categorized for the interviewees: between 3 and 6 h (23.3%), 6 and 9 h (46.7%) and 9 and 12 h (30%). The artisanal fishermen in Caleta Pisagua did not have fixed schedules for fishing and their activities were mainly dependent on the weather conditions.
Regarding product sales, 90% of the interviewees deliver their products to a single beach auctioneer, 6.7% to the national market, and 3.3% to the international market. For the final buyer, 83.3% of interviewees responded that processing plants are the final buyers, and 16.7% mentioned that the buyers are private persons.
With respect to the impacts of climate events such as El Niño in marine resources, 90% of the interviewees agreed that climate events have effects, 6.7% stated that they had no effects, and 3.3% did not know. With regard to the type of job, five groups were identified, namely, divers (50%), shore collectors and seafood pickers (10%), helpers (13.3%), and fish catchers (23.3%). Regarding to the worker type, only 13.3% work alone and 86.7% of the interviewees do not work alone. Those who work alone corresponded to actual fish catchers.
Three sets of working hours were categorized for the interviewees: between 3 and 6 h (23.3%), 6 and 9 h (46.7%) and 9 and 12 h (30%). The artisanal fishermen in Caleta Pisagua did not have fixed schedules for fishing and their activities were mainly dependent on the weather conditions.
Regarding product sales, 90% of the interviewees deliver their products to a single beach auctioneer, 6.7% to the national market, and 3.3% to the international market. For the final buyer, 83.3% of interviewees responded that processing plants are the final buyers, and 16.7% mentioned that the buyers are private persons.
With respect to the impacts of climate events such as El Niño in marine resources, 90% of the interviewees agreed that climate events have effects, 6.7% stated that they had no effects, and 3.3% did not know.

Artificial Reef Profile
With regard to the acceptance of ARs as an alternative for improving the production of benthic marine resources, 83.3% of the interviewees accepted the AR technology, while 16.7% of the interviewees rejected it. A Chi-Square test indicated that the acceptance rate was significantly higher than 50% (p < 0.05) and the acceptance rate had no significant association with the age group of fishermen (p > 0.05) As for the reason for preferring AR technology, 40% of the interviewees responded "more income", 30% mentioned "more income and catch", 16.7% did not like this technology, 6.7% preferred the technology because they could have more buyers, and 3.3% preferred more access to resources. A total of 53.3% of the interviewees preferred both (natural and artificial) substrates, 26.7% preferred natural, and 20% preferred an artificial substrate.

Artificial Reef Profile
With regard to the acceptance of ARs as an alternative for improving the production of benthic marine resources, 83.3% of the interviewees accepted the AR technology, while 16.7% of the interviewees rejected it. A Chi-Square test indicated that the acceptance rate was significantly higher than 50% (p < 0.05) and the acceptance rate had no significant association with the age group of fishermen (p > 0.05).
As for the reason for preferring AR technology, 40% of the interviewees responded "more income", 30% mentioned "more income and catch", 16.7% did not like this technology, 6.7% preferred the technology because they could have more buyers, and 3.3% preferred more access to resources. A total of 53.3% of the interviewees preferred both (natural and artificial) substrates, 26.7% preferred natural, and 20% preferred an artificial substrate.
Regarding the place for the deployment of AR, 33.3% of the interviewees favored near the shore, 16.7% preferred far from the shore, while 40% preferred both places (depending on the resources). Regarding the depth, 70% of the interviewees answered installation at depths of 11 to 20 m, while 23.3% preferred depths of 21 to 30 m. Regarding the preference in building AR, 90% of the interviewees preferred self-build, 6.7% preferred self-build or purchase, and 3.3% did not agree to building.

Discussion
Spanier et al. [7] indicated that 54 of the 60 exploitable resource species found in all Chilean AMERBs occur within the boundaries of the Caleta Pisagua AMERB. Eighty percent of these species are sedentary resources that require hard substrate (Table 1) as their habitat or refuge in one or more of their life stages, suggesting that the full utilization of these resources depends on the availability of substrate. Both main and secondary benthic resources exploited by the Caleta Pisagua fishermen need the supply of hard substrate as their habitats. Therefore, deploying AR may result in the socioeconomic improvement of local artisanal fishermen with the increase in typical benthic resources (shellfish, fish, and algae) due to the consistency of high levels of primary production from the HCLME. This is a quite unique case since most relevant fishery-related use of ARs elsewhere in the world has been reported mainly as fish-gathering devices [40]. Based on the mean density of "loco" (0.217 kg/m 2 ) in Tacna area, Peru (150 km in straight line north of Pisagua) [41], the estimated biomass of "loco" was 37 tons if 100 ARs (17 m 2 for each) were deployed in the AMERB of Caleta Pisagua. Even only 10% of the biomass was harvested in the 1700 m 2 area, the estimated catch of 3.7 tons was larger than the landing of 1.8 tons for the entire AMERB (153.8 hectares) in 2012.
In relation to the legal issue, the analysis of Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen as a function of the Chilean application of AR is relevant to the official need of information to develop the Official Legal Guidelines to be later published in the Official Gazette, as required by law. The implementation of AR in Chile will require further marine policy development, since there are currently no applicable regulations, except perhaps those related to marine pollution and legal size and/or reproductive status of several marine species. The present legal text of the 2015 Act on Fishery and Aquaculture allows the use of ARs in artisanal fisheries reserved areas. However, the general Act's Official Guidelines have not been yet published in the Official Government Gazette. It is conceived that basic oceanographic, biological, ecological, and practically-derived knowledge shall be taken into account.
The interviews of Caleta Pisagua fishermen rendered useful information for the implementation of the AR technique in Pisagua. First, while the concept of AR is positively understood and well taken by the artisanal fishermen who are members of the syndicate that have the rights over the Caleta Pisagua AMERB, some of them find it important to have continued access to the natural settings outside the AMERB. Many older members suggested that an immediate innovation in the way fishermen exploit the resources-the surplus of naturally available, hard bottom species for the epi-biota-is urgent.
Moreover, the interviewees expressed that the central and regional governments should invest in infrastructure. In particular, a municipal water treatment plant is an urgent need of construction. This is a long overdue element that will even be critical with the greater AR output of fisheries resources requiring initial processing in situ. It is hoped that infrastructure development can be made after installation of ARs when full production of benthic resources is achieved. Currently, without AR, the socioeconomic advantages of harvesting target species growing within the AMERBs on naturally derived hard substrates, have met with mixed problems, despite officially approved regulations and periodically evaluated management plans [17].
Regarding the fishermen profile, the age structure data show a mature population of artisanal fishermen where the majority are older than 50 years and only 10% are young, indicating that present activity in the site is heavily relied on aged people and fundamental socioeconomic changes are not carried out to retain young people. Most interesting is that with reference to the type of activity, the main one is diving with divers conforming half of the surveyed group, which together with their assistants or helpers, make up 63% of the total surveyed artisanal fishermen. This group is obviously benefitted from the implementation of the AR within their AMERB because they are the ones that normally work directly on the hard bottom resources. Actual fishermen who will also be benefitted with the increase in demersal fish attracted by ARs for various purposes [42].
Regarding fishermen's working practices, the majority of the interviewees in Caleta Pisagua carry out their work in teams, a fact that is vital for the implementation of the system of ARs both in relation with their management and the fair and ordered utilization of the resources. In relation with the same point, Caleta Pisagua fishermen already have experience in the administration of their AMERB which was established in 2000. It is also important to mention that for 70% of the Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen, fishing is their only activity; there are no other work opportunities that would come handy in times of resource bans or rough seas. These factors continue maintaining the village population in the limits of vulnerable poverty, conditions that make the implementation of technological alternatives that could improve their livelihood urgent. The productive limitations of the present AMERB system require that fishermen must also move farther away from the cove to search for hard bottom resources in areas of free access.
All Caleta Pisagua artisanal fishermen have no fixed working hours or fixed agendas. The working hours fully depend on the weather conditions. This will lead to idle time when weather conditions do not allow fishermen to work at sea. Installing AR should reduce the working hours and the danger of shipwrecking far from the coast, and improve their quality of life. Under certain weather conditions, they would even be able to work within the bay.
The majority of Caleta Pisagua fishermen harvest more than one marine resource, depending on the established regulations for each species. Besides increasing the biomass of resources that have been traditionally harvested, ARs could increase the biomass of secondary species, 73% of which require hard substrate for their development. With proper management, these secondary species could be the solution when any management measure-such as banning fishing-affects the access to the main resources.
With reference to the main question "Do you like the artificial reef technology?", the majority of fishermen had positive answers (83.3%). Fishermen learned from their experience that an increase in the required substrate will result in an increase in biomass of both of their principal target species as well as of secondary resources. They further appreciated that with proper management, a constant extractive activity could be maintained, and their annual income could be increased. This is important for those fishermen that sell their harvest to the village and neighbor villages, and the city's restaurants, because the fishing activity in Caleta Pisagua is directly related to the summer tourist activity.
The major reasons that fishermen favor the installation of AR are the increase in income and catch, easy access, easy supervision, less time involved, and lower level of hardship in terms of general activity. A good degree of a sense of team work was also revealed, which is most favorable for the success of their AMERB enterprise, once it is implemented by ARs.
The distance at which the ARs could be installed will depend on the main target species, although the majority of fishermen expressed that the ARs should be installed near inshore so that harvest could even be performed in bad weather. Although the fishermen accepted the AR, they considered that their fishing effort should be efficient to combine both harvests on the AR resource and on the neighboring natural hard substrates. For fishermen interested in the diverse species of shellfish, main and secondary resources (bottom settlers and fish), snails, limpets, crab, sea-squirt, mussel, barnacles, octopi, anemones, and macro-algae, coincided in that the depth of ARs installation should not exceed 30 m, with the majority coinciding with the range between 11 and 20 m deep. These depths are considered ideal both by divers and net and hook fishermen, and coincide with the depth at which both the main and secondary resources occur and the maximum allowed diving depth. The experience of Caleta Pisagua AMERB fishermen indicates that the highest landings of two of the most important resources (the "loco" snail and the edible sea urchin), are obtained at depths between 5 and 15 m [37].
It is important to mention that approximately 98% of the snail "loco" landings in the Pisagua area (~27 ton) were harvested from Caleta Pisagua AMERB in 2009 [43]. This resource was under a national extractive ban from 2012 to 2017, but the ban did not apply to AMERBs, marine reserves or protected areas of multiple uses with a valid management plan. In this manner, AR could help recover the natural population and improve landings, reducing the effect of official restrictive measures.
Taking into account the levels of photosynthetic fixed carbon C and extensive eutrophic bottoms, it is proposed that for all Chilean management areas, primary food availability should not be a limiting factor for the improvement of landings [44][45][46][47]. Thus, the surface area allotted to AR during a primary phase should not be larger than the amount considered for the development of aquaculture within the AMERBs, which corresponds to 20% of its total area [43]. One of the main environmental problems that the introducing of AR could face in Caleta Pisagua relates to the impact of the sporadic, warm El Niño events accompanied more or less by strong sea surface temperature anomalies which directly affect the settled populations, disturbing their reproduction, larval development and settling; mobile species (fish, crabs, prawns, octopi) would probably migrate south or in deeper waters. According to the fishermen of Caleta Pisagua, during the last El Niño event of 2015-16, the structure of the neritic community changed along with the arrival of a previously unknown fish species of important economic value.
As a collateral social effect, AR would allow natural resources to benefit the whole community by providing a stable, more predictable output; this stability is necessary for a healthy, active, and progressive human organization [48,49]. In this context, isolated and remote human communities-far from larger cities such as Caleta Pisagua but with great potential to generate economic returns-should be supported by the central and local governments with the initial basic infrastructure needed to process and add value to its products. In the particular case of Caleta Pisagua, our research uncovered that the artisanal fisherman union has the elements of a processing plant in store which paradoxically cannot be utilized because the municipality lacks a sewage treatment plant, and thus, it cannot obtain the sanitary permits to elaborate their marine resources. This vicious circle continues to persist, making it impossible for the union to opt for a seal of origin for its products. It is hoped that by the time the AR gets its place in Caleta Pisagua, this limitation would already be eliminated.
The implementation of AR in Caleta Pisagua could further develop into a microscale example of the provisions needed to reach the sustainable goals proposed by the United Nations as challenges for the year 2030. The main objectives that could be attained by ARs are those related to reducing poverty, hunger, promoting gender equality, decent work, and economic growth through the development of industry and implement of innovative infrastructure to mitigate the impact of climate change. It is hoped that the Caleta Pisagua example can be applied to other fishing villages in Northern Chile that have similar situations.

Conclusion and Recommendations
The results derived from this study indicated that ARs could play an important role in the socioeconomic development of the artisanal fishermen of northern Chile. The fundamental factors to the development of AR are as follows: oceanographic conditions of high productivity, the decrease that fisheries have generally exhibited, the present conservation-oriented coastal territorial management (AMERBs), the highly organized artisanal fishermen, the diversity and high reproductive capacity of hard bottom-associated species, and the high acceptance rate of the use of ARs among the Caleta Pisagua fishermen.
Two general recommendations for the implementation of the artificial reef system in Chile are as follows:

1.
A specific management plan for ARs should be developed for both main and secondary species with systematic and direct evaluations. Furthermore, an exploitation program for each species that considers annual quotas, seasonal closure, minimum size limit, and annual reports on the stock status must be applied.

2.
Criteria for deploying AR should be implemented considering four stages: (1) site survey and selection, (2) material selection and reef design, (3) reef construction and deployment, and (4) evaluation of effectiveness. The carrying capacity of site, currents, bathymetry, and geomorphology should be developed before AR installation. The next marine policy step with respect to AR in Chile is suggested to be the formulation of official guidelines that regulate this activity and promote its development.

16.
What According to your field observations, which substrate is best for fixing organisms? ___ Natural ___ ART ___ Both ___ No know 27.
What is better, build or buy AR? ___ to buy ___ to build ___ Both 28.
Preference for installation in distance ___ Near to shore ___ Far to shore ___ Both ___ none 29.
Do you recommend this technology? ___ Yes ___No