Next Article in Journal
Environmental Determinants of a Country’s Food Security in Short-Term and Long-Term Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
A Spatially Explicit Decision Support System for Assessment of Tree Stump Harvest Using Biodiversity and Economic Criteria
Previous Article in Journal
Advancing Applied Research in High Volume Transport in Low-Income Countries in Africa and South Asia
Article

Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services

1
Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden
2
Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(10), 4089; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089
Received: 21 April 2020 / Revised: 13 May 2020 / Accepted: 14 May 2020 / Published: 16 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Forest Bioenergy Options)
Bioenergy is expected to contribute to mitigating climate change. One major source for bioenergy is woody biomass from forests, including logging residues, stumps, and whole trees from young dense stands. However, at increased extraction rates of woody biomass, the forest ecosystem, its biodiversity, and its ability to contribute to fundamental ecosystem services will be affected. We used simulation and optimization techniques to assess the impact of different management strategies on the supply of bioenergy and the trade-offs between wood fuel harvesting, biodiversity, and three other ecosystem services—reindeer husbandry, carbon storage, and recreation. The projections covered 100 years and a forest area of 3 million ha in northern Sweden. We found that the development of novel and cost-effective management systems for biomass outtake from young dense stands may provide options for a significant supply of bioenergy to the emerging bioeconomy, while at the same time securing biodiversity and important ecosystem values in future stand developments. In addition, there is potential to increase the extraction of harvest residues and stumps while simultaneously improving conditions for biodiversity and the amount of carbon stored in forest ecosystems compared to current levels. However, the projected continuing trend of increased forest density (in terms of basal area) has a negative impact on the potential for reindeer husbandry and recreation, which calls for researching new management strategies on landscape levels. View Full-Text
Keywords: decision support; trade-off; woody biofuels; harvest residues; forest management decision support; trade-off; woody biofuels; harvest residues; forest management
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Eggers, J.; Melin, Y.; Lundström, J.; Bergström, D.; Öhman, K. Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089

AMA Style

Eggers J, Melin Y, Lundström J, Bergström D, Öhman K. Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services. Sustainability. 2020; 12(10):4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eggers, Jeannette, Ylva Melin, Johanna Lundström, Dan Bergström, and Karin Öhman. 2020. "Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services" Sustainability 12, no. 10: 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop