Cognitive Training for the Treatment of Addictions Mediated by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The work presents a novel approach in the study of addictions. In general, the work is adequate and interesting, despite which some minor aspects to improve are discussed below.
In line 58 mention is made of smoking behavior, I recommend not reducing only to that type of behavior.
In spite of the theoretical mentions regarding addiction, mainly from a neurobiological point of view, it would be interesting to mention the social aspects present in addictions as important elements both in the development and in the evolution of the disease, as well as its importance in the treatment, as part of the explanatory theoretical context.
I find a certain disorder in the structure of the sections of the manuscript, such as that on line 228, point 4 is introduced "Materials and method" after discussion. Likewise, given that the work is a narrative review, a major development of the studies selected in the core of the article is needed. On the other hand, to visually summarize the relevant information, I would recommend synthesizing the most significant information in a summary table following the APA criteria.
Author Response
Responses to Reviewer 2 comments:
The following adjustments were made to the paper:
This work constitutes a narrative review of the state of knowledge and advances in the intervention and treatment of addictions through the use of ICT. The article does not fit the structure of a scientific article (introduction, theoretical basis, method, results, discussion and conclusions). The structure should be corrected.
R:The paper was structured like this: Introduction, Theoretical basis, Materials and Method, Results, Discussion, Conclusions and References.
explain the methodology used better.
R: The explanation of the methodological process was expanded.
The research questions should be clearly formulated, since they will facilitate the reader's understanding
R:The study question was introduced on line 87.
In the conclusions section, respond to the research problem raised.
R:The conclusions that answer the research question were reviewed.
Bibliographic references were updated Thanks
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
This work constitutes a narrative review of the state of knowledge and advances in the intervention and treatment of addictions through the use of ICT. The article does not fit the structure of a scientific article (introduction, theoretical basis, method, results, discussion and conclusions). The structure should be corrected.
explain the methodology used better.
The criteria for exclusion of articles are not clear, it should be better explained.
The research questions should be clearly formulated, since they will facilitate the reader's understanding
In the conclusions section, respond to the research problem raised.
Author Response
Regards,
The following adjustments were made to the paper:
This work constitutes a narrative review of the state of knowledge and advances in the intervention and treatment of addictions through the use of ICT. The article does not fit the structure of a scientific article (introduction, theoretical basis, method, results, discussion and conclusions). The structure should be corrected.
R:The paper was structured like this: Introduction, Theoretical basis, Materials and Method, Results, Discussion, Conclusions and References.
explain the methodology used better.
R: The explanation of the methodological process was expanded.
The research questions should be clearly formulated, since they will facilitate the reader's understanding
R:The study question was introduced on line 87.
In the conclusions section, respond to the research problem raised.
R:The conclusions that answer the research question were reviewed.
Bibliographic references were updated Thanks
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
El manuscrito ha mejorado notablemente desde la primera revisión. Se puede publicar como está
