Innovations in Chewable Formulations: The Novelty and Applications of 3D Printing in Drug Product Design

Since their introduction, chewable dosage forms have gained traction due to their ability to facilitate swallowing, especially in paediatric, geriatric and dysphagia patients. Their benefits stretch beyond human use to also include veterinary applications, improving administration and palatability in different animal species. Despite their advantages, current chewable formulations do not account for individualised dosing and palatability preferences. In light of this, three-dimensional (3D) printing, and in particular the semi-solid extrusion technology, has been suggested as a novel manufacturing method for producing customised chewable dosage forms. This advanced approach offers flexibility for selecting patient-specific doses, excipients, and organoleptic properties, which are critical for ensuring efficacy, safety and adherence to the treatment. This review provides an overview of the latest advancements in chewable dosage forms for human and veterinary use, highlighting the motivations behind their use and covering formulation considerations, as well as regulatory aspects.


Introduction
The oral route is the most common route for administrating medicines as it is the most convenient and is easy to handle, making it the first choice for clinicians and most patients [1]. In general, oral formulations are considered to be cheaper than formulations designed for other routes [2]. Moreover, many drugs are well suited to be administered orally using different types of dosage forms, including liquids, capsules, tablets or chewable formulations.
Despite their advantages, conventional solid (e.g., tablets and capsules) and liquid (e.g., solutions and suspensions) dosage forms still have some limitations [3][4][5]. One of the main disadvantages associated with the solid forms is the swallowing difficulties encountered by some patient populations (e.g., paediatrics and geriatrics) [4,6]. Although liquid dosage forms are easy to swallow, they suffer from stability issues and dosing errors [3]. Chewable formulations-e.g., chewable tablets, gummies, gums and lozenges ( Figure 1)-on the other hand, are gaining attention due to their ease of administration, safety and lack of stability challenges. These formulations can be produced using different pharmaceutical methods, depending on the type of dosage form being made. However, most of these processes are complex, involving multiple unit operations. Figure 1. Images of (A) chewable tablets [7]; (B) chewable gummies [8]; (C) chewing gums [9]; and (D) lozenges [10]. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing tool that offers a sophisticated way of creating personalised chewable formulations [11]. The technology has been widely investigated to fabricate various types of 3D printed dosage forms, termed Printlets TM , in different sizes, shapes, flavours and drug doses [12][13][14][15]. Moreover, it offers the possibility of engineering multi-drug dosage forms, known as PolyPrintlets, which could benefit patients on a polypharmacy and simplify their dosing regimen [16][17][18]. This is achieved through the development of patient-friendly formulations that are tailored to each patient's needs and preferences, improving medication adherence [19,20]. The benefits are particularly significant in the case of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices, where a small variation in the drug dose can cause severe side effects.
This review aims to provide an overview of chewable formulations, covering the most common approaches and formulation development processes used for their production. Particular attention is paid to the recent innovations made using 3D printing, highlighting its potential for solving technical issues and organoleptic properties, which are critical for efficacy, safety and adherence to treatment. Finally, regulatory aspects of chewable tablets are addressed. The searching criterion used to gather all the information is included as Supplementary Material (File S1: Literature searching criterion).

Advantages and Disadvantages
One main advantage of chewable tablets is their suitability to be administered to patients with swallowing difficulties, such as geriatric and paediatric patients and those suffering from dysphagia [21,22], improving their acceptability to treatments [23]. Another benefit is the absence of the need to co-administer them with water, making their use convenient for patient intake. Additionally, as they disintegrate in the mouth, part of the drug dissolves in the saliva and is consequently absorbed through the buccal cavity, avoiding the first-pass effect and increasing the drug's bioavailability. Moreover, chewable tablets are not constrained by size, as they are designed to be chewed before they are swallowed. Figure 1. Images of (A) chewable tablets [7]; (B) chewable gummies [8]; (C) chewing gums [9]; and (D) lozenges [10]. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing tool that offers a sophisticated way of creating personalised chewable formulations [11]. The technology has been widely investigated to fabricate various types of 3D printed dosage forms, termed Printlets TM , in different sizes, shapes, flavours and drug doses [12][13][14][15]. Moreover, it offers the possibility of engineering multi-drug dosage forms, known as PolyPrintlets, which could benefit patients on a polypharmacy and simplify their dosing regimen [16][17][18]. This is achieved through the development of patient-friendly formulations that are tailored to each patient's needs and preferences, improving medication adherence [19,20]. The benefits are particularly significant in the case of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices, where a small variation in the drug dose can cause severe side effects.
This review aims to provide an overview of chewable formulations, covering the most common approaches and formulation development processes used for their production. Particular attention is paid to the recent innovations made using 3D printing, highlighting its potential for solving technical issues and organoleptic properties, which are critical for efficacy, safety and adherence to treatment. Finally, regulatory aspects of chewable tablets are addressed. The searching criterion used to gather all the information is included as Supplementary Material (File S1: Literature searching criterion).

Advantages and Disadvantages
One main advantage of chewable tablets is their suitability to be administered to patients with swallowing difficulties, such as geriatric and paediatric patients and those suffering from dysphagia [21,22], improving their acceptability to treatments [23]. Another benefit is the absence of the need to co-administer them with water, making their use convenient for patient intake. Additionally, as they disintegrate in the mouth, part of the drug dissolves in the saliva and is consequently absorbed through the buccal cavity, avoiding Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1732 3 of 36 the first-pass effect and increasing the drug's bioavailability. Moreover, chewable tablets are not constrained by size, as they are designed to be chewed before they are swallowed.
In terms of disadvantages, it may be challenging to load chewable formulations with drugs having unpleasant or pungent tastes (e.g., bitter taste) without the addition of large amounts of sweeteners and flavouring agents. Chewable tablets are also hygroscopic and thus, must be stored in a dry place in airtight containers. Moreover, these formulations have been reportedly associated with incidents involving tooth damage or denture breakage resulting from excessive tablet hardness and oesophageal irritation.

Target Population for Chewable Tablets
Before prescribing a medication, a clinician must consider whether or not the patient can swallow it completely, safely and comfortably [24]. Some patient groups may have different requirements compared to the general population due to the inherent properties of each population. Thus, it is vital to select the best treatment that meets the special requirements (e.g., taste preferences, swallowing abilities, dose etc.) of each patient group. Patient acceptability to a pharmaceutical dosage form is critical for adherence and ensuring therapeutic outcomes are being met, especially in paediatric and geriatric populations [23]. Understanding patient adherence often involves an interplay of many factors that influence whether or not a patient successfully follows recommendations or completes a therapeutic program [22]. This includes the site of application, dosage form, composition of the formulation and the route of administration [24]. It has been reported that 1 in 11 primary care patients experience frequent difficulties in swallowing tablets and capsules, which is an ongoing problem that is highly disregarded by healthcare professionals [6]. It is therefore important for physicians to pay closer attention to swallowing difficulties to avoid non-adherence and inappropriate drug modifications, particularly in paediatric, geriatrics and dysphagia patients.

Dysphagia
Dysphagia refers to the difficulty in swallowing solids or liquids and includes any form of disruption to the swallowing process [25]. It has many different aetiologies and can affect a person of any age [26,27]. In general, people with anatomical or physiologic deficits in the mouth, pharynx, larynx and oesophagus may demonstrate signs and symptoms of dysphagia [25]. This condition may develop during infancy, childhood and adolescence due to congenital causes, acute infectious causes, injury, and neurodevelopmental delay [26]. In the middle-aged population, dysphagia could manifest from gastroesophageal and immunologic causes, which are predominantly associated with reflux, whereas in elderly patients, neurologic and oncologic causes are prevalent [26]. Age-related changes in swallowing physiology, as well as age-related diseases, are predisposing factors for dysphagia in the elderly [25]. Moreover, dysphagia contributes to a variety of negative health status changes, most notably, the increased risk of malnutrition and pneumonia [25].
Dysphagia not only affects the intake of food and drinks but also that of medicines [21]. Swallowing tablets or capsules can be problematic for this patient group, requiring modification of the formulation (e.g., crushing tablets or opening capsules) to facilitate administration [28][29][30]. However, this is associated with risks of altering the drug's pharmacokinetic profile or its therapeutic activity, potentially leading to adverse effects due to dose dumping [31,32].
In this regard, chewable tablets could provide a suitable alternative to conventional oral dosage forms, which would greatly benefit patients by facilitating the passage of the dosage form into the digestive tract through the chewing process that precedes swallowing.

Geriatric Population
Typically, with ageing, patients may find swallowing a tablet uncomfortable, impacting their adherence to treatment, and deterring them from taking their medication(s). The implications become more pronounced in the case of patients on a polypharmacy (i.e., the regular use of five or more medications per day), leading to an increase in morbidity and Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1732 4 of 36 mortality rates. Thus, it has become common practice for patients or their caregivers to manipulate a medicine to facilitate its administration. However, this is associated with a high risk for medication errors, resulting in dose variation or dose dumping (e.g., in the case of enteric-coated tablets). Alternatively, in some cases, medicines for other routes of administration could be repurposed for oral use. As an example, the content of ampoules for parenteral use could be administered perorally, given that the drug substance is stable in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and that its peroral bioavailability is well understood [24]. Taking this into account, chewable tablets are considered suitable for use by elderly patients.

Paediatric Population
For decades, children have been regarded as "therapeutic orphans" [33] because pharmaceutical research, regulation and formulation development have been mainly focused on adults [34]. Thus, it has become common practice to modify dosage forms designed for adult administration before being given to children, either by preparing a suitable unlicensed medicine or by manipulating dosage forms at the point-of-care [32,35,36]. The use of unlicensed and off-label medicines (i.e., those prescribed and/or administered outside the terms of their marketing authorisation) is common in children due to their exclusion from trials during the drug development process [37].
In general, the physiological characteristics of paediatric patients rapidly change over time, making it a very heterogeneous population. It is well-known that children have different needs compared to adults and these differences have a huge impact on pharmacokinetics. Therefore, child-appropriate formulations with precise dosing are needed for efficient and safe therapy [38,39]. Due to this, efforts have been made in the EU and US to highlight this problem and find solutions to overcome existing gaps in paediatric treatments. Indeed, the Paediatric Committee at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was established in 2007 and, together with the mandatory Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP), forms the pillar of current regulations. The "Guideline on Pharmaceutical Development of Medicines for Paediatric Use" released by the EMA provides formulation criteria [40]. Whilst some of the defined attributes are the same as those for adult patients, there are significant differences and challenges that must be taken into account (e.g., heterogeneity, precise and appropriate dosing, swallowing difficulties, palatability and acceptability, and excipient safety) [24,40].
With these regulations in place, manufacturers have the opportunity to develop ageappropriate formulations that are both safe and efficacious. This should also facilitate carrying out clinical trials in children, enabling obtaining marketing authorisation for the use of these medicines in the paediatric population [35].

Types of Chewable Formulations and Conventional Manufacturing Methods
Chewable dosage forms could show different physical and mechanical characteristics, but all of them must be chewed to exert their intended action. Each type of chewable formulation and its manufacturing processes are described in detail in the next subsections.

Chewable Tablets
According to the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP), chewable tablets are oral dosage forms intended to be chewed and then swallowed by the patient rather than swallowed whole [41]. The USP differentiates two types of chewable tablets: those that may be chewed for ease of administration and those that must be chewed or crushed before swallowing to avoid choking and/or to ensure the release of the active ingredient [41]. The Japanese Pharmacopoeia defines chewable tablets as "tablets which are administered by chewing", while for the European Pharmacopoeia (EP), chewable tablets "are intended to be chewed before being swallowed".
In general, chewable tablets have a smooth texture, offer a pleasant taste and, ideally, should not leave a bitter or pungent aftertaste [42,43]. These dosage forms combine the advantages of conventional tablets in terms of manufacturability, dosing accuracy, portability and long-term stability [42], whilst providing favourable organoleptic and administration benefits. Chewable tablets may be preferred over conventional tablets and capsules when the required dose is high and the dosage form would be too big to pass through the oesophagus. They should be designed to be palatable and easy to chew and swallow. This is a useful patient-centric advantage, which can improve adherence to treatment, especially in patients who are unable or reluctant to swallow intact tablets or capsules due to their size or because of a disease condition [24,[44][45][46].
The development of a successful formulation depends on selecting appropriate excipients. Many of the excipients used to prepare chewable tablets are similar to those used in conventional tablets ( Table 1). The key excipients in chewable tablets include flavouring agents and sweeteners because they are intended to be chewed, and it is necessary to mask unpleasant tastes. Like other types of tablets, conventional manufacturing methods, such as wet or dry granulation [47,48] and direct compression [49], are used for the preparation of chewable tablets ( Figure 2). The main advantages of using direct compression are its lower costs due to the fewer steps involved, the absence of a drying step, its suitability for moisture-and heat-sensitive drugs, and lower chances for microbial growth or cross-contamination [50,51]. Nonetheless, this production method has some limitations, such as being prone to segregation, can include limited drug content, and the poor compressibility of some substances [50]. In fact, it has been estimated that less than 20% of pharmaceutical materials can be directly compressed into tablets due to a lack of flow, cohesion properties and lubrication [52]. Therefore, materials must be blended with other directly compressible ingredients (e.g., α-lactose monohydrate or microcrystalline cellulose), or the powder must be granulated prior to compression to obtain flow and cohesion properties suitable for compression [50,52,53]. This increases the complexity of the process, making it more costly and laborious.

Chewing Gums
A chewing gum can be defined as a pliable preparation consisting of a gum base designed to be chewed and remains in the mouth rather than being swallowed [55]. Whilst in the mouth, this dosage form provides a slow and steady release of the drug contained inside it [56]. Therefore, the drug delivery process depends on the patient-dosage form interaction [57,58]. When the masticatory process is absent, no relevant drug release occurs. In fact, the controlled drug release action from the gum matrix is only active in the elastic state of the gum [57]. The masticatory activity of the patient determines the rate of transformation from the inactive, glassy, solid gum state to its active, rubbery, water-penetrating elastic mass responsible for regulating the drug release rate [57].
Medicated chewing gums consist of a masticatory gum core that may be coated. The core is composed of an aqueous insoluble gum base, which can be mixed with sweeteners and flavouring agents [59,60]. The coating can be applied as a film of polymers, waxes, sweeteners, flavouring agents and colourants or as a thick layer of sugar or sugar alcohols. The active ingredient may be present in the core, in the coating, or in both [59].
Medicated chewing gums have several advantages over other types of formulations [60]. They can be taken without water and can be administered discretely anywhere and at any time, releasing the drug and achieving the desired therapeutic activity over a suitable timeframe [60]. The gum can be removed by the patient, inhibiting the drug release at any time. Some diseases that affect the teeth or oral cavity can be treated or prevented (caries prevention and xerostomia) through local drug release in the mouth region [59]. According to the EP, chewing gums are not only intended for the local treatment of mouth diseases but may also be used for systemic drug delivery since drug absorption occurs

Chewing Gums
A chewing gum can be defined as a pliable preparation consisting of a gum base designed to be chewed and remains in the mouth rather than being swallowed [55]. Whilst in the mouth, this dosage form provides a slow and steady release of the drug contained inside it [56]. Therefore, the drug delivery process depends on the patient-dosage form interaction [57,58]. When the masticatory process is absent, no relevant drug release occurs. In fact, the controlled drug release action from the gum matrix is only active in the elastic state of the gum [57]. The masticatory activity of the patient determines the rate of transformation from the inactive, glassy, solid gum state to its active, rubbery, water-penetrating elastic mass responsible for regulating the drug release rate [57].
Medicated chewing gums consist of a masticatory gum core that may be coated. The core is composed of an aqueous insoluble gum base, which can be mixed with sweeteners and flavouring agents [59,60]. The coating can be applied as a film of polymers, waxes, sweeteners, flavouring agents and colourants or as a thick layer of sugar or sugar alcohols. The active ingredient may be present in the core, in the coating, or in both [59].
Medicated chewing gums have several advantages over other types of formulations [60]. They can be taken without water and can be administered discretely anywhere and at any time, releasing the drug and achieving the desired therapeutic activity over a suitable timeframe [60]. The gum can be removed by the patient, inhibiting the drug release at any time. Some diseases that affect the teeth or oral cavity can be treated or prevented (caries prevention and xerostomia) through local drug release in the mouth region [59]. According to the EP, chewing gums are not only intended for the local treatment of mouth diseases but may also be used for systemic drug delivery since drug absorption occurs through the buccal mucosa or in the GI tract. Drugs that are directly absorbed via the Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1732 7 of 36 membranes lining the oral cavity bypass the first-pass effect and avoid degradation in the GI tract. On the other hand, drugs that are released but not absorbed in the oral cavity dissolve or disperse in the saliva and are swallowed down the gut [59].
Aspergum was the first medicated gum to be marketed in the US in 1924 [60]. It contains acetylsalicylic acid and is indicated as an analgesic and antipyretic agent [61]. Nowadays, the most common medicated gum that has had a great impact on the world is nicotine gum. It is indicated for the relief of nicotine withdrawal symptoms and to aid in smoking cessation [62][63][64][65]. Since their introduction, chewing gums have been well accepted by the general population [60], and efforts have been made to launch other active ingredients for different indications. This includes those for anti-caries or anti-plaque effect (e.g., fluoride [66][67][68], chlorhexidine [67,69,70], xylitol [67,71], sorbitol [71,72], enzymes [73], zirconium silicate [74] or zinc acetate [75]) [76][77][78], oral candidiasis (e.g., miconazole [79,80]), bacterial infections (e.g., combination of neomycin/gramicidin [81]) and fungal infections (e.g., nystatin [82]). Chewing gums containing caffeine have also been indicated for their systemic activity in alleviating the effects of insomnia or fatigue [83], sleep inertia [84] and improvement of the alert state [85]. Similarly, dimenhydrinate has been formulated in chewing gums for the treatment of motion sickness [86,87]. It is well absorbed after oral administration but undergoes first-pass metabolism [87]. Therefore, formulating it as a chewing gum could benefit from buccal absorption, improving its bioavailability and providing a faster therapeutic effect [88].
Methods used to manufacture chewing gums can be broken down into three main techniques [89].

Conventional or Fusion Method
The conventional or fusion method involves melting all the components of the gum base in a kettle with blades for mixing ( Figure 3) [60]. The excipients are added in steps and are mixed at defined time points, whereas the drug is usually incorporated into the gum base before mixing it with other excipients to ensure its homogenous distribution [60]. The mixture is then passed through a series of rollers, forming a thin, wide ribbon. During this process, a light coating of finely powdered sugar or sugar substitutes can be added to prevent the gum from sticking and to improve its flavour. Subsequently, the gum is cooled for 48 h to allow it to set [60,90]. Finally, it is cut to the desired size and cooled under controlled temperature and humidity conditions [60]. Despite the simplicity of this approach, its main drawbacks lie in the stability issues associated with thermolabile drugs and the lack of precise form, shape or weight [89,90].

Cooling, Grinding and Tableting
In this method, excipients of the gum base are cooled to a temperature at which the composition is sufficiently brittle and would remain brittle during the subsequent grinding step without adhering to the grinding apparatus [90]. Prior to the cooling step, some additives such as anti-caking (i.e., prevent agglomeration) and grinding agents (i.e., prevent the gum from sticking to the grinding apparatus) can be added to the mixture to facilitate cooling and grinding and to achieve the desired properties [89,90]. In general, the cooling temperature will differ depending on the composition of the chewing gum but is usually ≤−15 • C. Subsequently, the cooled mixture is crushed or ground to attain small fragments. Once the cooling agent is removed, the powder can then be mixed with the drug and the remaining excipients (e.g., binders, lubricants, flavouring agents, coating agents and sweeteners) in a blender. Finally, the mixture becomes ready for compression, which can be carried out using any conventional method, given that the humidity is strictly controlled [89,90]. The latter is considered the major limitation to this production pathway, and in fact, this method was developed to overcome the limitations of the fusion method [89]. In this method, excipients of the gum base are cooled to a temperature at which the composition is sufficiently brittle and would remain brittle during the subsequent grind-

Direct Compression
The last manufacturing technique is the direct compression method [89,90,92]. It consists of free-flowing powders (e.g., Pharmagum) comprising a mixture of polyols, sugars, and gum base, which can be directly compacted using a conventional tableting machine, reducing manufacturing time and costs [89]. This manufacturing method accelerates the whole production process due to the mixture being directly compressible. However, the obtained chewing gums are generally harder and crumble during chewing, rendering them unpleasant to the patient [89].
Further information about the recent advances in medicated chewing gums preparation methods and mechanisms can be found in this review paper [92].

Chewable Lozenges
Depending on their texture and composition, lozenges can be categorised into hard lozenges, soft lozenges, chewable lozenges and compressed lozenges. Due to the focus of this review, only chewable lozenges will be discussed thereafter.
In chewable or caramel-based lozenges, drugs are incorporated into a caramel base (i.e., glycerinated gelatine base), and the dosage form should be chewed instead of being dissolved in the mouth, delivering the drug product down the GI tract for systemic absorption [93]. Typically, the formulation consists of glycerine, gelatine, and water [94]. These lozenges are often highly fruit flavoured and may have a slightly acidic taste to mask the acrid taste of glycerine [93]. The candy base is made up of a mixture of sugar and corn syrup in ratios of 50:50 to 75:25 [95]. Whipping agents (e.g., milk protein, egg albumin, gelatine, xanthan gum, starch, pectin, alginate, and carrageenan) are used in these types of lozenges to obtain the desired degree of soft chew [95]. The manufacturing process involves several steps [94,95]. First, the candy base is cooked at 95-125 • C and is transferred to a planetary/sigma blade mixer. The mass is then cooled, and the whipping agent is added below 105 • C. Subsequently, the drug is incorporated between 95-105 • C. The colourant is then dispersed in humectants and added below 85 • C, which is followed by the addition of the lubricant. Finally, the mixture is rolled into long strands of suitable thicknesses and thereafter cut into desired sizes. The formed lozenges must be cooled as quickly as possible to prevent loss of shape. To do so, they are usually cooled on a conveyor belt made of chains or canvas. Once collected, the properly sized lozenges must be stored in a climate-controlled room at 15-20 • C and relative humidity of 25-35%.

3D Printing of Chewable Tablets: An Innovative Approach
Typically, medicines are manufactured in large batches with fixed doses through multistep processes that are performed in centralised locations. Recently, with the introduction of new production technologies, the pharmaceutical industry has experienced a paradigm shift, causing treatments to move away from "one-size-fits-all" approaches and advance towards "precision medicine". Precision or personalised medicine focuses on addressing the specific needs of patients and their medical condition, taking into account their genetic makeup and the inherent properties of the pharmaceutical product [96]. Thus, the overall goal is to improve the efficacy of the treatment whilst ensuring unwanted side effects are reduced.
In this new healthcare model, the end user's needs and preferences are considered from the beginning of the formulation design stage to the point of administering the final product [97,98]. Personalised therapy has long been a remarkable goal in therapeutics but has not been adopted yet, mainly because of the lack of necessary tools and incentives, economic barriers as well as insufficient medical and pharmaceutical professionals willing [97]. As current production methods are wholly unsuitable for personalisation, this calls for the need for new manufacturing methods that are both simple and flexible, permitting the on-demand fabrication of medicines.
The 3D printing technology has been identified as a disruptive force in other fields, making it well suited for this application [14,[99][100][101]. It is an additive manufacturing technology that enables the layer-by-layer fabrication of 3D objects based on digital 3D designs, created using a computer-aided design (CAD) software or obtained via 3D imaging techniques [11]. Although 3D printing is well-known in the automobile, aerospace and engineering fields, its use within the pharmaceutical space is somewhat new [102]. In fact, attention was drawn to it in 2015, following the FDA approval of the first 3D printed medicine (Spritam, levetiracetam) [103]. Since then, abundant research has been done on 3D-printed medicines and medical devices [99,[104][105][106], with several attempts being made to launch 3D-printed drug products on the market. The main motivation behind the interest in this technology is its versatility and ability to customise doses, sizes, shapes and drug release profiles of small batches of medicines in a short time frame [107][108][109]. Thus far, its applications have extended to include personalised medicines, tissue engineering [110], controlled-release systems, as well as customised food products for specific needs [111][112][113]. Therefore, with this in mind and with the presence of suitable materials, 3D printing can be regarded as an ideal alternative method for producing personalised chewable tablets.
According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, there are seven major 3D printing categories: binder jetting, vat polymerisation, powder bed fusion, material extrusion, material jetting, directed energy deposition, and sheet lamination [114]. Of these, material extrusion is the most widely used one and includes the fused deposition modelling (FDM) and semi-solid extrusion (SSE) technologies. In general, the material extrusion process involves selectively dispensing a material through an orifice with the aid of heat [114]. In FDM, filaments are melted through a heated nozzle at a specific temperature, after which the material is deposited on the build plate to form the layers [115][116][117]. While SSE operates in a similar fashion, syringes containing gels, pastes or waxes are used instead of filaments [118][119][120].
SSE is an affordable 3D printing technology that can offer many advantages in this field [118]. As an example, the preparation of its ink is generally considered easy and requires a few excipients. Due to the nature of the starting materials, SSE can employ lower printing temperatures compared to FDM, making it suitable for use with thermolabile drugs [121]. Additionally, the use of disposable and pre-filled syringes provides benefits for meeting the critical quality attributes demanded by regulatory agencies [118,122]. In particular, this enables the syringes to be prepared and filled as per GMP requirements at normal pharmaceutical production facilities. Furthermore, cross-contamination between different drugs or formulations can be avoided without the need for additional decontamination steps.
To date, the SSE technology has been successfully used for the preparation of a wide range of chewable formulations in different shapes, colours and textures ( Figure 4) [123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133]. The most notable example is its use for the fabrication of isoleucine Printlets for children suffering from Maple Syrup Urine Disease, a rare metabolic disease characterised by the deficiency of the enzyme complex branched-chain alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase ( Figure 5A) [132]. A clinical study involving the use of these Printlets has shown their ability to provide tighter control over the blood levels of isoleucine compared to treatment provided using conventional capsules ( Figure 5B). Furthermore, children receiving the treatment and their caregivers have shown positive responses indicating their acceptability to the flavoured Printlets, with some flavours (e.g., orange) being more preferred over the other flavours ( Figure 5C). These findings have shed light on the potential of the SSE technology as a novel pharmaceutical production method for manufacturing personalised oral dosage forms.
ability to provide tighter control over the blood levels of isoleucine compared to treatment provided using conventional capsules ( Figure 5B). Furthermore, children receiving the treatment and their caregivers have shown positive responses indicating their acceptability to the flavoured Printlets, with some flavours (e.g., orange) being more preferred over the other flavours ( Figure 5C). These findings have shed light on the potential of the SSE technology as a novel pharmaceutical production method for manufacturing personalised oral dosage forms.  [126]. (B) 3D-printed jellylike formulations in various shapes and colours [123]. (C) Lego-like gelatine-based dosage form containing paracetamol (blue) and ibuprofen (red) [127]. (D) 3D-printed chocolate-based dosage forms in various designs (scale bar: 20 mm) [131]. (E) Gummy bear-shaped chewable tablets made using 11 different formulations based on gelatine and carrageenan [134]. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.  [126]. (B) 3D-printed jelly-like formulations in various shapes and colours [123]. (C) Lego-like gelatine-based dosage form containing paracetamol (blue) and ibuprofen (red) [127]. (D) 3D-printed chocolate-based dosage forms in various designs (scale bar: 20 mm) [131]. (E) Gummy bear-shaped chewable tablets made using 11 different formulations based on gelatine and carrageenan [134]. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.
A following study involved comparing children's perceptions of Printlets made using different 3D printing technologies (i.e., FDM, digital light processing (DLP), selective laser sintering (SLS) and SSE) ( Figure 6A) [135]. Despite the DLP Printlets being initially the preferred choice of the participants (aged 4-11 years) ( Figure 6B), after being informed that SSE Printlets are chewable, the participants changed their minds, and 79% of them were in favour of the chewable Printlets ( Figure 6C). In another acceptability study, it was shown that the shape, size and colour of Printlets could influence patients' willingness to take them [136], thus highlighting the importance of selecting a dosage form that meets a patient's particular preference to ensure his/her adherence to treatment.
The versatility of the 3D printing technology could be exploited to create multi-drug formulations termed PolyPrintlets. An example of such is the Lego-like chewable dosage forms fabricated using SSE ( Figure 4C) [127]. The gelatine-based formulations contained a combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen and are aimed at simplifying administration by being dispensed as a single dosage form that provides a synergistic therapeutic effect. In another approach, it has been shown that it is also possible to fabricate chocolate-based dosage forms for paediatric applications ( Figure 4D) [131]. The formulations were loaded with either paracetamol or ibuprofen, wherein the inherent drug properties governed its release behaviour. More recently, cereal-based 3D printed dosage forms have been suggested for paediatric use [137]. The concept involved concealing the drugs, namely ibuprofen and paracetamol, in a common breakfast ingredient, cereals. Herein, the crushed cereal was used as the ink for SSE 3D printing of oral formulations in different shapes (e.g., various letters, star, heart, torus and flower shapes) (Figure 7). These formulations are aimed at improving adherence to treatment in paediatric patients during their hospital stay. A following study involved comparing children's perceptions of Printlets made using different 3D printing technologies (i.e., FDM, digital light processing (DLP), selective laser sintering (SLS) and SSE) ( Figure 6A) [135]. Despite the DLP Printlets being initially the preferred choice of the participants (aged 4-11 years) ( Figure 6B), after being informed that SSE Printlets are chewable, the participants changed their minds, and 79% of them were in favour of the chewable Printlets ( Figure 6C). In another acceptability study, it was shown that the shape, size and colour of Printlets could influence patients' willingness to take them [136], thus highlighting the importance of selecting a dosage form that meets a patient's particular preference to ensure his/her adherence to treatment.  [135].
The versatility of the 3D printing technology could be exploited to create multi-drug formulations termed PolyPrintlets. An example of such is the Lego-like chewable dosage forms fabricated using SSE ( Figure 4C) [127]. The gelatine-based formulations contained a combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen and are aimed at simplifying administration by being dispensed as a single dosage form that provides a synergistic therapeutic effect. In another approach, it has been shown that it is also possible to fabricate chocolate-based dosage forms for paediatric applications ( Figure 4D) [131]. The formulations were loaded Owing to the digitised nature of the technology, it is forecast that in the future, 3D printing could be seamlessly integrated with other digital technologies, including artificial intelligence [138][139][140], biosensors [141,142] and robots [143,144], streamlining a new era of digital healthcare [145,146]. With the aid of these technologies, the personalisation of medicines can be facilitated by expediting the process and enabling execution in remote locations, including patients' homes. In fact, research in this area has already begun with the introduction of smartphone-enabled 3D printing [147]. This recently developed technology involves the use of a smartphone's screen to initiate the 3D printing of medicines inside a compact, portable 3D printing system. Whilst the concept is still in its infancy, more advancements are expected in the near future, fast-forwarding the implementation of 3D printing in clinical practice.  [137].
Owing to the digitised nature of the technology, it is forecast that in the future, 3D printing could be seamlessly integrated with other digital technologies, including artificial intelligence [138][139][140], biosensors [141,142] and robots [143,144], streamlining a new era of digital healthcare [145,146]. With the aid of these technologies, the personalisation of medicines can be facilitated by expediting the process and enabling execution in remote locations, including patients' homes. In fact, research in this area has already begun with

Excipients for Chewable Medicines
Typically, when formulating a medicine, the choice of excipients will depend on a number of factors, such as the type of dosage form, the production method, the API properties and the intended drug release profile [148]. Table 2 provides a summary of commercialised chewable medications and the excipients used in their formulation. It is essential to note that the key excipients listed in Table 1 (Section 4.1), which are used for manufacturing chewable tablets using conventional methods, can also be used for the preparation of 3D printed chewable formulations. To date, the use of 3D printing has been focused on jelly-like chewable formulations. Thus, the use of gelling agents has become common [149]. This is due to their ability to modify the formulation's rheological properties, including its viscosity and texture [150].
The gelation process involves the entanglement of randomly dispersed polymer chains in such a way that they form 3D networks that contain solvents in their interstices. The main mechanisms of physical entanglement include ionotropic (i.e., crosslinking with ions), cold-set or heat-set gelation. The entangled regions, known as "junction zones", may be formed by two or more polymer chains, wherein the resulting number and strength of junctions are affected by several factors (e.g., the concentration of the gelling agent, temperature, pH and presence or absence of ions) [151].
The most commonly used gelling agents include gelatine, starch, pectin, carrageenan and alginate. Agar, cellulose derivatives (e.g., carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose), chitosan, hyaluronic acid, collagen and gellan gum have also been tested [150,152]. Whilst some gelling agents have the ability to spontaneously form gels, a few of them (e.g., xanthan and guar gum) must be coalesced together to improve their viscosity or induce the gelation process. It must be noted that the choice of gelling agent is critical for 3D printing. This is because modifying the ink's viscoelasticity will impact the printing resolution and precision and, consequently, the final geometry of the dosage form.

Veterinary Applications
Veterinary pharmaceuticals play an important role in the preservation and restoration of animal health [173]. In the veterinary field, animal-appropriate medicines, which are available in a wide range of dosages, are also required to meet animals' needs. Species differences affecting the design and performance of veterinary dosage forms include pharmacokinetic differences, feeding habits, environmental factors, age and management practices [174]. Generally, the medicine's dose is adjusted based on the weight of the animal [173]. Therefore, it is common for a drug to be marketed with several strengths. This is best exemplified with fluralaner, clindamycin hydrochloride and mavacoxib (Table 3). Alternatively, it is ordinary practice for vets and pet owners to split marketed tablets into two or four pieces to meet an animal's requirements (e.g., dose or swallowing abilities). Like humans, animals have preferences that affect their compliance and willingness to take a medicine [174]. Thus, when a veterinary medicine is developed, animals' preferences are an important aspect to consider. For instance, dogs prefer animal-based proteins (e.g., chicken, pork and beef), whilst horses like fruit flavours (e.g., apple). As such, the Simparica Trio product contains pork liver powder, hydrolysed vegetable protein, sugars, and gelatine to address dog-specific sensory requirements.
Historically, oral dosage forms and parenteral formulations have been the primary dosage forms used for animal care [174]. Nowadays, with the advancement in pharmaceutical production, several more convenient oral dosage forms (e.g., palatable tablets) have been launched [174]. Indeed, chewable tablets have found applications in veterinary medicine for administration to domestic animals, especially cats [175] and dogs [176]. In fact, chewable tablets play a more essential role in veterinary pharmaceuticals than human ones. A summary of chewable formulations available on the market for animal use can be found in Table 3. As a matter of fact, the number of commercialised chewable formulations for veterinary use exceeds those for humans. A reason for this may be their easier administration due to the animal's willingness to ingest the medicine.      The benefits of 3D-printed medicines are not only limited to humans but can also extend to include veterinary applications. In this regard, 3D printing has been used for the production of animal prosthetics and implants [217][218][219] as well as veterinary dosage forms. Representative examples include orodispersible films containing prednisolone for the treatment of inflammatory diseases in cats and dogs ( Figure 8A) [220], chewable tablets (or ChewTs) containing theophylline for the treatment of asthma ( Figure 8B) [221] or gabapentin for the treatment of neuropathic pain or prevention of seizures [222], both for use in cats and dogs. Dosage forms with precise doses and palatability could be 3D printed, especially using SSE technology, in the veterinary clinic or at the owner's home to ensure their suitability for the pet [11,220]. Further examples on 3D printing for animal use can be found in previous reviews [223,224]. The benefits of 3D-printed medicines are not only limited to humans but can also extend to include veterinary applications. In this regard, 3D printing has been used for the production of animal prosthetics and implants [217][218][219] as well as veterinary dosage forms. Representative examples include orodispersible films containing prednisolone for the treatment of inflammatory diseases in cats and dogs ( Figure 8A) [220], chewable tablets (or ChewTs) containing theophylline for the treatment of asthma ( Figure 8B) [221] or gabapentin for the treatment of neuropathic pain or prevention of seizures [222], both for use in cats and dogs. Dosage forms with precise doses and palatability could be 3D printed, especially using SSE technology, in the veterinary clinic or at the owner's home to ensure their suitability for the pet [11,220]. Further examples on 3D printing for animal use can be found in previous reviews [223,224].  [220] and (B) theophylline chewable tablets [221], in different sizes. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.

Considerations and Requirements of Chewable Tablets-A Regulatory Aspect
As mentioned in previous sections, a chewable tablet must ideally be [41]: easy to chew, palatable, have an appropriate size and shape, and disintegrate readily. In this section, the main recommendations and assays that should be carried out to ensure the Figure 8. Images of SSE 3D printed (A) prednisolone-loaded films [220] and (B) theophylline chewable tablets [221], in different sizes. All images were reprinted with permission from their original sources.

Considerations and Requirements of Chewable Tablets-A Regulatory Aspect
As mentioned in previous sections, a chewable tablet must ideally be [41]: easy to chew, palatable, have an appropriate size and shape, and disintegrate readily. In this section, the main recommendations and assays that should be carried out to ensure the quality of chewable tablets are discussed [41]. It must be noted that these methods are applicable for both chewable and swallowable tablets due to the similarities between both.

Mechanical Properties
According to the USP, mechanical tests that are used to indirectly assess chewability include hardness (also known as "breaking force"), tensile strength, and the recently developed chewing difficulty index. Hardness refers to the force needed to break a tablet in a specific plane and may be expressed in a variety of units (e.g., kilopond (kp), kilogramforce (kgf), Newton (N), and Strong-Cobb Units (scu)) [225]. The tablet is placed between two platens across its diameter, wherein one of the platens moves and applies force until the tablet fractures. Typically, for chewable tablets, hardness values below 12 kp are recommended by the FDA. However, higher values may be allowed if the tablet's hardness reduces after exposure to saliva [41]. Hardness plays an important role because chewable tablets with high mechanical strength have a high risk of breaking teeth, dentures, or mandibular joints. Ideally, chewable tablets should be hard enough to resist the rigors of manufacturing, packaging, shipping, and distribution but should not cause harm to the patient during administration [41]. Despite the extensive use of hardness for the determination of a tablet strength, variations related to inaccuracies in the instrumental scales of different apparatuses, the load application method and the size or geometry of the tablet have been reported [226][227][228][229].
Two methods are used for measuring a tablet's tensile strength: (a) diametral compression or the diametrical tensile strength test ( Figure 9A) [230], and (b) flexural bending or the flexure tensile strength test ( Figure 9B) [231]. quality of chewable tablets are discussed [41]. It must be noted that these methods are applicable for both chewable and swallowable tablets due to the similarities between both.

Mechanical Properties
According to the USP, mechanical tests that are used to indirectly assess chewability include hardness (also known as "breaking force"), tensile strength, and the recently developed chewing difficulty index. Hardness refers to the force needed to break a tablet in a specific plane and may be expressed in a variety of units (e.g., kilopond (kp), kilogramforce (kgf), Newton (N), and Strong-Cobb Units (scu)) [225]. The tablet is placed between two platens across its diameter, wherein one of the platens moves and applies force until the tablet fractures. Typically, for chewable tablets, hardness values below 12 kp are recommended by the FDA. However, higher values may be allowed if the tablet's hardness reduces after exposure to saliva [41]. Hardness plays an important role because chewable tablets with high mechanical strength have a high risk of breaking teeth, dentures, or mandibular joints. Ideally, chewable tablets should be hard enough to resist the rigors of manufacturing, packaging, shipping, and distribution but should not cause harm to the patient during administration [41]. Despite the extensive use of hardness for the determination of a tablet strength, variations related to inaccuracies in the instrumental scales of different apparatuses, the load application method and the size or geometry of the tablet have been reported [226][227][228][229].
The diametral tensile strength (σh) is calculated using: where Fh is the load or force needed to break a tablet (also known as hardness or breaking force), D is the diameter of the tablet, and H is its thickness. The flexure tensile strength (σf) can be calculated using: where Ff is the force needed to break a tablet under flexural or bending stress, and L is the constant distance between the two lower supports. The diametral tensile strength (σ h ) is calculated using: where F h is the load or force needed to break a tablet (also known as hardness or breaking force), D is the diameter of the tablet, and H is its thickness. The flexure tensile strength (σ f ) can be calculated using: where F f is the force needed to break a tablet under flexural or bending stress, and L is the constant distance between the two lower supports.
Although the tensile strength values calculated by the two methods are different, they are proportional to one another [229,231]. The relationship between the two tensile values can be deduced from the following equation: where k is the constant of proportionality. Substituting Equations (1) and (2) in Equation (3) results in the following: Since 3πL is an experimental constant and k is the constant of proportionality, the chewing difficulty index (CDI) has been proposed as a measure of the ease or difficulty of chewing a chewable tablet and is defined as [233]: Although the tensile strength provides a more fundamental measure of a tablet's strength due to its independence of the size and measurement method, it is only limited to cylindrical tablets. Thus, CDI values can be used as an alternative when it is not possible to measure the tensile strength [233,234].

Disintegration and Dissolution
Chewing a dosage form helps reduce its size, enabling it to be swallowed more easily, especially in the case of large tablets. However, in some cases, patients may choose to swallow an entire chewable tablet without mastication or without chewing the dosage form enough before swallowing it, posing a risk for potential GI obstructions. This can be avoided by formulating chewable tablets to have a rapid disintegration time. The latter refers to the time needed for a tablet to break up into small pieces. In vitro disintegration testing should be performed in a suitable medium [41], using established and validated disintegration equipment (e.g., basket-rack assembly or disks [41,235]). Ideally, the tests should be carried out using intact tablets to predict their behaviour if swallowed whole. Although the FDA recommends a disintegration time short enough to prevent GI obstruction, no specific values have been described [41]. It is important for manufacturers to emphasise on the product label that these tablets must be chewed before swallowing, avoiding any free interpretations by the end-users and ensuring patient safety. For dissolution testing, the FDA also recommends carrying out the experiments using intact tablets [41] whilst employing validated methods [e.g., the basket method (USP apparatus I) and the paddle method (USP apparatus II) [236].
It is advisable that chewable tablets meet the same disintegration and dissolution specifications as immediate-release tablets [41]. It should be noted, however, that these testing conditions do not entirely mimic realistic conditions of chewable tablets. Instead, more research is needed to develop new validated methods that are specific to these dosage forms. In particular, the methods must replicate the chewing of the dosage forms before performing in vitro dissolution tests. However, there are several aspects to take into consideration; for one, it could be difficult to validate such methods that simulate and mimic the chewing patterns, especially since they vary based on patient populations. Moreover, it is challenging to assess whether the proposed methods are equivalent or superior to the existing approaches or not.

Conclusions
Chewable tablets are dosage forms suitable for use in certain patient populations, especially paediatrics, geriatrics and those who suffer from dysphagia, complying with their individual requirements. Despite the advantages that chewable formulations offer, the current methods used for their production are inherently time-consuming and inflexible, making it difficult to optimise the dosage form characteristics based on the individual needs and preferences of patients, both of which affect their adherence to the therapeutic plan. In addition, it can be noted that chewable dosage forms are widely used in routine clinical practice, both for humans and animals, as shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. However, there is still a need for new approaches capable of addressing the limitations of conventional manufacturing methods.
Recently, 3D printing, in particular the SSE technology, has gained attention as a novel fabrication method for the production of chewable medicines. The implementation of this disrupting approach is set to revolutionise the way dosage forms are fabricated in the near future. This technology can create palatable dosage forms with personalised doses, shapes, colours and textures in a simple and fast process, using the same excipients as conventional chewable tablets and, therefore, making it superior to manufacturing methods currently in use. This statement is reflected in many of the articles cited in this review, in which the semi-solid extrusion technology was successfully used to prepare bespoke chewable formulations.
Indeed, this innovative concept has already been tested in a clinical trial performed in a hospital setting with children, wherein the positive findings are a testament to SSE technology's great potential. More recently, further studies were carried out in patients, wherein the application of chewable formulations can be further understood; one such included an acceptability study related to children's perceptions of Printlets (3D printed oral dosage forms) made using different 3D printing technologies. Although SSE Printlets were not originally the participants' top choice, after being informed that SSE Printlets were chewable, the majority of participants shifted their preference in favour of the chewable Printlets.
The benefits of 3D printing are not only limited to human healthcare but also extend to veterinary medicine, where both vets and pet owners could exploit it to create customisable formulations in a fast and simple manner, avoiding dosing errors or the animals' rejection of unpalatable medicines. Although progress has been made in the use of 3D printing for the preparation of chewable formulations, a myriad of research is yet to be done with regards to the selection of appropriate starting materials (especially gelling agents) and the characterisation of the rheological properties (mainly the viscosity) of formulations suitable for 3D printing.
From a regulatory perspective, chewable tablets are treated similar to conventional tablets, with disintegration and dissolution assays conducted on whole tablets in the same manner as swallowable tablets. However, in reality, the in vivo performance of these formulations differs from that observed during in vitro tests due to the absence of a step that mimics the chewing process. Regarding their mechanical properties, the chewing difficulty index (CDI) has been recently proposed as a quantitative measurement of the ease or difficulty of chewing a chewable tablet and is increasingly being used by researchers. Nevertheless, there is still no significant progress in developing methods that can evaluate chewable formulations following masticating. Thus, researchers should be encouraged to develop new validated methods to evaluate chewable dosage forms under realistic conditions. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:// www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics14081732/s1, File S1: Literature searching criterion. Acknowledgments: L.R.P. acknowledges the predoctoral fellowship provided by the Ministerio de Universidades (Formación de Profesorado Universitario (FPU 2020)). The graphical abstract was created using BioRender.com (accessed on 27 July 2022). Figure 4E's rights are owned by a third party.
Conflicts of Interest: Abdul W. Basit and Alvaro Goyanes are founders of the pharmaceutical company FabRx. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The company had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.