Daphne Genkwa Sieb. et Zucc. Water-Soluble Extracts Act on Enterovirus 71 by Inhibiting Viral Entry

Dried flowers of Daphne genkwa Sieb. et Zucc. (Thymelaeaceae) are a Chinese herbal medicine used as an abortifacient with purgative, diuretic and anti-inflammatory activities. However, the activity of this medicine against enteroviral infections has not been investigated. The water-extract of dried buds of D. genkwa Sieb. et Zucc. (DGFW) was examined against various strains of enterovirus 71 (EV71) by neutralization assay, and its initial mode of action was characterized by time-of-addition assay followed by attachment and penetration assays. Pretreatment of DGFW with virus abolished viral replication, indicating that DGFW inhibits EV71 by targeting the virus. GFW exerts its anti-EV71 effects by inhibiting viral entry without producing cytotoxic side effects and thus provides a potential agent for antiviral chemotherapeutics.


Introduction
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a positive-strand RNA virus and belongs to the Enterovirus genus of the family Picornaviridae.It is a member of the Picornaviridae family and has a (+)RNA genome 7.5 kb in length that encodes 2193 amino acids [1,2].The polyprotein is cleaved proteolytically into distinct proteins by the viral-encoded proteases 2A pro and 3C pro .The structural proteins comprising VP1 to VP4 and the nonstructural proteins 2A to 2C and 3A to 3D are required for viral replication [2].EV71 is a common enterovirus that usually causes hand, foot and mouth disease in children but is often associated with brainstem encephalitis, neurogenic shock and polio-like acute flaccid paralysis.EV71 caused an outbreak with 78 mortalities in 1998, with manifestations of neurological involvement and cardiopulmonary failure.In a long-term study, survivors of EV71-induced CNS infection were found to have neurological sequelae and retarded mental development [3].Several epidemics occurred and caused a total of 51 fatalities in 2000-2001 [4].Unfortunately, there is no therapy with proven efficacy to control EV71.Given these recurring outbreaks and annual epidemics, there is a clear need to develop inhibitors for EV71.
Viruses must deliver their genome into the host cells to initiate replication.Most of them enter cells by endocytosis during which they hijack cellular machinery for the attachment to receptors and subsequent penetration across the plasma membrane.Several receptors to facilitate EV71 entry have been reported, including scavenger receptor B2, human P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 and sialylated glycans [5][6][7].A strategy to disrupt the interaction between viral particles and their receptors would be ideal for antiviral development.
We have been identifying traditional Chinese medicines with antiviral or prophylactic activity against EV71 infections [8,9].The flower buds of Daphne genkwa Sieb.et Zucc.(Thymelaeaceae), known as Won-Hwa or Yuanhua in Chinese, are collected in the spring before blossoming.As a traditional medicine, they have been used as an abortifacient [10], with purgative, diuretic and anti-inflammatory actions [11].Previous phytochemical studies on D. genkwa have led to the isolation of pharmacologically active flavonoids, diterpene orthoesters and coumarins, showing inhibitory activity against xanthine oxidase and adenosine 3,5-cyclic monophosphate phosphodiesterase, as well as exhibiting antileukemic activity [12].In the present study, we used Chinese traditional medicine extracts for anti-EV71 activity.We found that Daphne genkwa Sieb.et Zucc.extracts (DGFW) could neutralize the EV71-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) in human embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells.The half maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) of DGFW on EV71 was approximately 0.163 ± 0.013 mg/mL.DGFW inhibited EV71 viral protein and viral RNA synthesis.Additionally, DGFW suppressed viral activity at the adsorption stage of uptake as shown by a time-of-addition assay.Cells pretreated with DGFW could not block viral infection.Therefore, it is possible that DGFW binds to the virus to affect its activity.We conclude that DGFW possesses antiviral activity and has the potential for development as an anti-EV71 agent.

The Water-Soluble Fraction of D. genkwa Inhibits Viral Replication
In an endeavor to identify anti-EV71 Chinese medicines, we initially screened a panel of 48 extracts of Chinese herbs with antioxidant properties.An assay to measure the inhibition of virus-induced cell death in RD cells was first employed using 1 mg/mL of herbal extracts followed by EC 50 determination if the candidates possessed antiviral activity from the primary screening.We identified that the water fraction of D. genkwa was a potent agent against EV71 isolate 2231 with an EC 50 of 0.163 ± 0.013 mg/mL and a concentration producing 50% cytotoxicity (CC 50 ) of 1.444 ± 0.193 mg/mL using RD cells (Table 1).However, its solvent (CHCl 3 ) layer did not demonstrate anti-EV71 activity (Figure 1).DGFW was also able to inhibit successfully other isolates of EV71 except for isolate 1101 (genotype B5; Table 1).Interestingly, this extract was effective against influenza virus, although the selectivity index was not satisfactory.However, DGFW did not show activity against CVs or two DNA viruses, adenovirus and HSV-1, at a concentration of 1 mg/mL (Table 1).The preparation of DGFW is shown in Figure 1 and the final dried extract was weighed and dissolved in DMSO for antiviral analysis.We explored the effects of DGFW in protecting against virus-induced CPE on RD cells by microscopic assay (Figure 2).The RD cells were infected with EV71 isolate 2231 in the presence or absence of 0.5 mg/mL, which was not toxic to the cells by MTT assay (Figure S1).RD cells infected with virus displayed a typical CPE in which the cells became rounded and eventually detached from the culture dish (panel D, Figure 2).This effect was not caused by DGFW alone (panel B, Figure 2) or 0.25% vehicle DMSO (panel C, Figure 2).DGFW but not DMSO protected the cells from virus-induced CPE (panel E versus F, Figure 2), indicating that DGFW inhibited viral replication.We therefore performed qPCR and western blotting to confirm the antiviral effect of DGFW (Figure 3).The cells were first infected with virus in the presence or absence of DGFW and the cells were harvested at indicated points (Figure 3A).The amount of viral RNA was quantified against a standard curve of known concentrations.The synthesis of viral protein was measured as viral proteins 3A and 3C.DGFW substantially reduced the synthesis of viral RNA and viral proteins (Figure 3B,C).

DGFW Inhibits Early Stages of Replication
We assessed the antiviral mode of action using a time-of-addition assay in which DGFW was added at different stages of one infection cycle (Figure 4).DGFW was either added before viral preadsorption, during adsorption (-1 to 0 h p.i.), or after viral adsorption.The viruses from cells and culture medium were then collected for plaque assay at 10 h p.i. (Figure 4B).DGFW was able to reduce viral titer considerably during the viral preadsorption step between −1 and 0 h p.i. (lane 4, Figure 4).DGFW did not target the cells when it was added before viral preadsorption (lanes 1-3, Figure 4B).The late stages, such as viral package and release, were not inhibited by DGFW because no reduction of viral titer was seen when the extract was added immediately after viral adsorption (lanes 6-8, Figure 4B).Altogether, these results demonstrate that DGFW might target cellular uptake of the virus.(B)

DGFW Inhibits Viral Attachment and Penetration
To test the mechanism of inhibition of viral entry into host cells by DGFW, we performed attachment and penetration assays.Viral uptake into cells occurs first by binding to receptors followed by clathrin-dependent endocytosis into early endosomes [13].The attachment assay was used to examine the binding of the virus to receptors, and the penetration assay was used to test the entry step following receptor binding.We used HFF3 cells for these assays because RD cells were easily detached from the dishes when incubated on ice, and HFF3 cells are susceptible to EV71 infection [14].For the attachment assay, the HFF3 cells were incubated with 100 TCID 50 of EV71 for 3 h in the presence of DGFW on ice.The cytoprotection of DGFW was then determined.DGFW was able to inhibit attachment of EV71 into HFF3 cells with an EC 50 of 0.185 ± 0.056 mg/mL (Figure 5A).For the penetration assay, DGFW was added during viral entry into cells at 37 °C following viral preadsorption.DGFW was also able to inhibit penetration with an IC 50 of 0.245 ± 0.063 mg/mL (Figure 5B).DGFW might bind to and thus inhibit the virus, because DGFW displayed a similar IC 50 against EV71 based on attachment and penetration assays.

DGFW Targets the Virus Directly but not the Host Cells
We next examined whether DGFW acted at the cell surface, such as via receptor-virus binding, by pretreatment of RD cells with DGFW for 30 min at 37 °C (lane 2, Figure 6).Unbound DGFW was removed, the cells were then infected with EV71 for 1 h, and the progeny viruses in the cells and culture medium were harvested for plaque assay at 10 h p.i.Similarly, EV71 was pretreated with DGFW or DMSO for 30 min at 37 °C, and the infectivity of the treated virus was then determined by plaque assay (Figure 6).Pretreatment of cells with DGFW did not show any reduction of viral titer, suggesting that DGFW did not affect viral binding to the cells directly.In contrast, pretreatment of the virus with DGFW caused a substantial reduction of viral titer, but this was not seen after treatment with DMSO alone, implying that DGFW might target the virus directly and specifically (Figure 6; lane 3 versus lane 4).This result was consistent with the time-of-addition assay (Figure 4).This direct targeting effect was further demonstrated by a lower concentration of DGFW.This was done by pretreating the virus with DGFW for 30 min followed by diluting the mixture 10 5 -fold, whereby the DGFW did not have inhibitory activity.The infectivity of the treated virus was then determined by plaque assay (Figure 6B).Pretreatment with DGFW produced a significant reduction of viral titer by about 50% compared with the DMSO control, suggesting again that DGFW suppresses viral activity by targeting the virus directly (Figure 6B).

Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that DGFW suppressed viral adsorption to RD cells by time-of-addition assay.Cells pretreated with DGFW did not show inhibition of viral infection, indicating that DGFW does not inhibit cellular viral receptors.However, DGFW was able to inhibit viral endocytosis by reducing viral attachment to and penetration into host cells.Furthermore, pretreatment of virus with DGFW abolished viral replication, indicating that DGFW inhibits EV71 by targeting the virus directly (Figure 6).
Currently, there is no effective vaccine or antiviral agent to combat EV71.Many antienteroviral agents against poliovirus or rhinovirus have been thus tested for their efficacy against EV71.Pleconaril, a WIN compound and in clinical development, has been reported to inhibit several types of enterovirus-induced meningitis and aseptic meningitis [15].The WIN series of compounds inhibit viral replication primarily by binding the hydrophobic canyon region of capsid protein VP1 to stabilize the viral capsid structure, so that after the virus enters the host cell it cannot undergo the uncoating process [16].However, Pleconaril did not effectively inhibit the CPE induced in cell cultures by the EV71 strain isolated from patients who had contracted hand, foot and mouth disease in 1998 [17].We demonstrated here that DGFW might target the viral particle for inhibition.However, DGFW did not show strong binding activity to the virus in a filter assay, suggesting that DGFW acts through transient binding but leads on to potent inhibitory activity (Figure S2).
Phylogenetic analysis of complete VP1 sequences has identified three EV71 genotypes: A, B and C. Genotypes B and C can be further divided into subgenotypes B1 to B5 and C1 to C5 [18].DGFW inhibited EV71/BrCr, EV71/TW/2231/98 and EV71/TW/71552/05, which belong to subgenotypes A, C2 and C4, respectively.However, the EC 50 of DGFW against EV71/TW/1101/08 (subgenotype B5) was greater than 1 mg/mL, but this dose was equivalent to the effective cytotoxic concentration and therefore cannot be considered as having an inhibitory effect.We demonstrated that DGFW targets the virus to inhibit the attachment and entry steps.However, DGFW did not inhibit the B5 subgenotype, and this can be explained by the demonstrated differences in VP1 sequences [19].The phylogenetic analysis showed distinct differences between CV-B and EV71, and consequently DGFW did not inhibit CV-B1 to B5 as expected (Table 1).Additionally, as DGFW appears to inhibit different genotypes of EV71 to different degrees, this might explain why DGFW does not target cellular factor(s).
Flavonoids are common constituents of plants used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat a variety of diseases.D. genkwa has been used for the isolation of flavonoids, and studies have reported the isolation of luteolin, 7-O-methylluteolin, tiliroside [20], apigenin, genkwanin, sitosterol, benzoic acid [21] and genkwadaphnin [21,22] from the dried flower buds.Apigenin showed a strong inhibitory activity against xanthine oxidase [21], as well as against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and influenza virus [23][24][25].Luteolin and its glycosides have been widely used for their antimicrobial properties, and HBV, SARS-CoV and the influenza virus can be inhibited as shown by in vitro studies [24][25][26].However, no anti-EV71 activity of flavonoids isolated from D. genkwa has been demonstrated.Interestingly, similar to our findings, apigenin was able to inhibit the influenza virus but did not show antiviral activity against HSV (Table 1) [23,24,27].The examination of anti-EV71 activities of apigenin and other purified compounds from D. genkwa is ongoing.On a cautionary note, Daphne bud extracts, whether from the ether layer or the water layer, can also induce early antigen expression of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [28].Up to 90% of the world's human population has a latent EBV infection, and it has a high association with nasopharyngeal carcinomas in southeast Asia and certain other countries [29].In addition, D. genkwa possesses the harmful side effect of abortifacient activity.Thus, there is a need to isolate the effective anti-EV71 ingredients that do not lead to the induction of EBV early antigen production or act as abortifacients.

Virus and Cell Culture and Viral Amplification
RD cells and human foreskin fibroblast (HFF3) cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco) and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA; BioWhittaker Inc., Walkersville, MD, USA).Adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (A549) were cultured in MEM containing NEAA.All cells were kept at 37 °C under 5% CO 2 in air in a humid incubator.EV71 TW/2231/98 (genotype C), BrCr (genotype A), TW/71552/05 (subgenotype C4), TW/1101/08 (subgenotype B5), coxsackievirus (CV)-B1 to B5, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 and adenoviruses were kindly supplied from the Clinical Virology Laboratory of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (Table 1) [30].Influenza virus A/WSN/33 was obtained from the American Type Cell Culture and was amplified accordingly [30].Overnight cultures of monolayers of RD cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) before being inoculated with EV71 or CV-B at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 0.01.The cells and culture supernatants containing viral progeny were collected when cells developed a CPE of ~80%.The progeny viruses inside the cells were released by three cycles of freezing-thawing, and the resulting viral suspension was pooled with the culture medium, aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until use.

Plant Material
Dry flower buds of Daphne genkwa were supplied and authenticated by the Department of Pharmacy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.A voucher specimen (No.CGU-DG-1) was deposited in the herbarium of Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.Dry flower buds (5.0 kg) were extracted with methanol seven times (30 L each) under reflux for 8 h and concentrated to give a brown syrup (745.75 g) (Figure 1).The syrup was suspended in H 2 O and partitioned with CHCl 3 and n-butanol, successively.The water-soluble layer was concentrated to gain a red-brown syrup (153.27g).

Determination of Median Tissue Culture Infective dose and Antiviral Neutralization Assay
Monolayers of RD cells (2  10 4 per well) were cultured in 96-well plates overnight before use.EV71 TW/2231/98 was used hereafter if not mentioned otherwise.A virus suspension with threefold serial dilution in DMEM containing 2% FBS (E2) was added to the cells and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h and subsequently fixed with 100 L of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 h.The attached cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet at room temperature, and the density of staining was measured in a microplate reader (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA).The dilution causing cytopathology in half the cultures (the median tissue culture infective dose, or TCID50) was then calculated using the Reed-Muench method.The TCID50 determinations for the attachment and penetration assays were performed similarly except that preadsorption was carried out for 3 h on ice.A neutralization assay (EC 50 ) was used to test the antiviral efficacy of extracts or compounds by measuring the inhibition of CPE induced by enterovirus on RD cells.RD cells (2  10 4 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated for 16-20 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO 2 /air incubator.After infection, cells were overlaid with 50 L of different concentrations of extracts and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO 2 /air incubator for 72 h.At the end of incubation, cells were fixed with PFA, followed by 0.1% crystal violet staining.The concentration required for extracts to reduce the virus-induced CPE by 50% relative to the virus control was defined as the EC 50 .

Cytotoxicity Assay
Aliquots of 2  10 4 RD cells per well were seeded overnight in 96-well plates before use.Twofold serial dilutions of DGFW in E2 were added and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h.The medium was carefully withdrawn without touching the cells.MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; 0.5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added at 50 L/well and incubated for 3 h.Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; 200 L/well) was added to dissolve the crystals, and the absorbance at 570 nm of each well was measured using a microtiter plate reader (MRX ELISA reader, Dynex Technologies).The concentration of DGFW that caused the death of 50% of the cells was defined as the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC 50 ).

Plaque Assay
Monolayers of RD cells (4.5  10 5 per well) were seeded in 6-well plates.After an 18 h culture, the cells were inoculated with serially diluted viral suspensions for 1 h.The cells were washed with DPBS and overlaid with warm 0.3% agarose in E2.After incubation for 4 days, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 2 h.The agarose was carefully removed and subsequently stained with 0.1% crystal violet.The titer of the virus was expressed as plaque-forming units (PFU) per mL.

Western Blotting
After electrophoresis, proteins were electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).The proteins of interest were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h and then incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies.Proteins were detected by using an enhanced chemiluminescence western blotting detection system (Millipore).Polyclonal antibodies against 3A and a monoclonal antibody against 3C were as described [31,32].

CPE Testing
RD cells (4  10 5 cells/mL) were seeded into 6-well plates and then challenged with viruses at an m.o.i. of 1.The cells were pretreated with viruses for 1 h on ice and washed with DPBS, and then E2 was added.After 20 h incubation at 37 °C, the cells were stained with 0.4% sulforhodamine B (SRB) in 1% acetic acid, and CPE was observed using a microscope.For DGFW treatment, the cells were pretreated with 0.5 mg/mL extracts and virus simultaneously for 1 h and washed with DPBS, and then E2 containing 0.5 mg/mL DGFW was added.The protective effect exerted by DGFW was also observed after incubation for 20 h at 37 °C.

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification and Absolute Quantitative (q)PCR
The in vitro transcripts of the EV71/2231 infectious clone plasmid, which was kindly provided by Dr. Meishan Ho of Academia Sinica, Taiwan, was serially diluted tenfold for spectrophotometric analysis.After determining the RNA concentration, the copy number of standard RNA molecules can be calculated using the following formula: (X g/L RNA /[transcript length in nucleotides  340])  6.022  1023 = Y molecules/L.The viral RNA was then mixed with 50 nM forward and reverse primers and SYBR green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) followed by qPCR analysis using an ABI StepOne Plus Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems).The primers used were: EV71 VP2 forward, 5-CTG ATG GCT TCG AAT TGC AA-3, and reverse, 5-GCG TTT ATG TAC GGC ACT ATT ATT GT-3; GAPDH forward, 5-GGT GGT CTC CTC TGA CTT CAA CA-3, and reverse, 5-GCG TCA AAG GTG GAG GAG TG-3.A standard curve (plot of the CT value/crossing point against the log of the amount of standard added) was thus generated using different dilutions of the standard.RD cells (4  10 5 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates overnight.The cells were then preadsorbed with EV71 at an m.o.i. of 5 for 1 h in the presence of 0.5 mg/mL DGFW.The culture medium was then replaced with E2 containing the same concentration of DGFW, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C and harvested at 0, 3, 6 and 9 h post infection (p.i.) for total RNA extraction using TRIzol.cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription with M-MLV RT kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for qPCR analysis using specific viral primers: forward, 5-CTG ATG GCT TCG AAT TGC AA-3, and reverse, 5-GCG TTT ATG TAC GGC ACT ATT ATT GT-3.Amplification was achieved using the following universal thermal cycling protocol: one cycle at 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min.The absolute amounts of viral RNA were then determined using an external standard curve.

Time-of-Addition Assay
A 6-well tissue culture plate was seeded with RD cells (4  10 5 cells/well), and incubated at 37 °C for 16-20 h under 5% CO 2 in air.The cells were infected with EV71 at an m.o.i. of 5 on ice.After viral adsorption, the cells were washed with Hank's buffered salt solution to remove any unbound virus.DGFW (0.5 mg/mL) in E2 was added at −9 to −1 h, −6 to −1 h and −3 to −1 h (preadsorption), −1 to 0 h (adsorption), 0 to 10 h, 3 to 10 h and 6 to 10 h (postadsorption).The supernatants were harvested at 10 h p.i., and the viral titers were determined by plaque-forming assays.

Attachment Assay
A 96-well tissue culture plate was seeded with HFF3 cells (2  10 4 cells/well), which were then incubated overnight at 37 °C under 5% CO 2 in air.The cells were chilled on ice for 1 h, and the medium was removed.The cells were infected with 100 TCID 50 of EV71 in the presence of increasing concentrations of DGFW on ice for 3 h.The medium containing the unadsorbed virus was removed, and the cells were then washed three times with DPBS.After incubation for 72 h in E2 at 37 °C, cells were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with crystal violet.Cell viability was determined by measuring the cell density in a microplate reader (MRX ELISA reader, Dynex Technologies).A Pueraria lobata extract at 3.125 mg/mL served as a positive control [33].This attachment method has been described [34].

Penetration Assay
A 96-well tissue culture plate was seeded with HFF3 cells (2  10 4 cells/well), which were then incubated overnight at 37 °C under 5% CO 2 .The cells were chilled on ice for 1 h, and the medium was removed.The cells were infected with 100 TCID 50 of EV71 on ice for 3 h.The medium containing unbound virus was then removed; various concentrations of DGFW in E2 were added, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to trigger endocytosis of the virus.The infected cells were then treated with alkaline phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 11) for 1 min to inactivate any viruses that had not penetrated the cells, and then acidic PBS (pH 3) was immediately added to neutralize the mix.The neutralized medium was removed, E2 was then replaced, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h.The cells were fixed with PFA and subjected to 0.1% crystal violet staining.A Pueraria lobata extract at 3.125 mg/mL served as a positive control [33].This penetration assay was modified from previous reports [35,36].

Data Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean [37] and analyzed using two-tailed Student's t-tests with p < 0.05 taken as significant.

Conclusions
GFW exerts its anti-EV71 effects by inhibiting viral entry without producing cytotoxic side effects and thus provides a potential agent for antiviral chemotherapeutics.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Flow chart of preparation of water-soluble fractions of D. genkwa.

Figure 4 .Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Time-of-addition assay of DGFW.(a) RD cells were infected with EV71 (m.o.i.5).DGFW (0.5 mg/mL) was added at the designated times.(b) Viral adsorption was from −1 to 0 h p.i. on ice.DGFW (0.5 mg/mL in E2) was added to the cells at the indicated times.After each treatment, DGFW was washed and replaced with fresh E2.RD cells were pretreated with DGFW from −9 to −1, −6 to −1, or −3 to −1 h p.i.The cells were washed and inoculated with EV71 for 1 h, and the unbound virus was removed and replaced with E2 and incubated for an additional 10 h.The supernatants were collected and the viral yields determined by plaque assay; "virus" is a virus-only control without DGFW treatment.The ratio of viral titers is presented as the mean ± SEM of the results of two experiments, and this is normalized to the virus-only control, set to 1.This is one representative result from two independent experiments.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Inhibition of viral entry by DGFW.Human foreskin fibroblast (HFF3) cells were cultured in 96-well plates.Cytoprotection was then measured by crystal violet staining of the attached cells on the plates.A Pueraria lobata extract at 3.125 mg/mL served as a positive control.(A) Dose dependence of DGFW inhibition of EV71 attachment.Increasing concentrations of DGFW were added to cells infected with EV71 and incubated for 3 h on ice.The cells were washed with DPBS and replaced with E2, warmed to 37 °C and incubated for 72 h.Cytoprotection was then determined.(B) Dose dependence of DGFW inhibition of EV71 penetration.HFF3 cells were chilled on ice for 1 h, followed by preadsorption of EV71 for 3 h on ice.Increasing concentrations of DGFW were then added, warmed to 37 °C and incubated for 1 h to allow the virus to enter the cells.The monolayers were treated with alkaline PBS (pH 11) to inactivate extracellular virus and were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h.Cytoprotection was then determined.This is a representative result from three independent experiments.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.DGFW might target the virus directly.(A) EV71 (m.o.i. 5) was preincubated with DGFW (0.5 mg/mL) or control vehicle (DMSO) for 30 min at 37 °C (−1.5 to −1 h.p.i.) and was then used to inoculate RD cells for 1 h (adsorption at −1 to 0 h p.i.).Similarly, RD cells were pretreated with DGFW for 30 min before viral adsorption for 1 h (-1 to 0 h p.i.).At 10 h p.i., the cells and culture medium were pooled for the determination of viral titers by plaque assays."All" indicates the presence of DGFW all through from −1.5 to 10 h p.i.; "virus" is a nontreated virus control, and the titer was set to 1.The fold change of viral titers is presented as the mean ± SEM of the results of two independent experiments.** p < 0.01; (B) EV71 was preincubated with DGFW (1 mg/mL) or DMSO for 30 min at 37 °C.The mixture was diluted 10 5 -fold for the plaque assay.The viral titer from pretreatment with DMSO was set to 1, and the fold change of viral titers is presented as the mean ± SEM of the results of two independent experiments.** p < 0.01.