Drug-Screening Strategies for Inhibition of Virus-Induced Neuronal Cell Death

A number of viruses, including Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), West Nile Virus (WNV), La Crosse Virus (LACV), Zika virus (ZIKV) and Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), have the ability to gain access to the central nervous system (CNS) and cause severe neurological disease or death. Although encephalitis cases caused by these viruses are generally rare, there are relatively few treatment options available for patients with viral encephalitis other than palliative care. Many of these viruses directly infect neurons and can cause neuronal death. Thus, there is the need for the identification of useful therapeutic compounds that can inhibit virus replication in neurons or inhibit virus-induced neuronal cell death. In this paper, we describe the methodology to test compounds for their ability to inhibit virus-induced neuronal cell death. These protocols include the isolation and culturing of primary neurons; the culturing of neuroblastoma and neuronal stem cell lines; infection of these cells with viruses; treatment of these cells with selected drugs; measuring virus-induced cell death using MTT or XTT reagents; analysis of virus production from these cells; as well as the basic understanding in mode of action. We further show direct evidence of the effectiveness of these protocols by utilizing them to test the effectiveness of the polyphenol drug, Rottlerin, at inhibiting Zika virus infection and death of neuronal cell lines.


Introduction
Viral-induced encephalitis is a rare, yet serious, neurological disease that can be life-threatening. A number of viral families can cause viral encephalitis including Herpesviruses (particularly Herpes Simplex Virus 1 (HSV-1) as well as HSV - [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Many of these viruses directly infect neurons in the CNS and can induce neuronal damage either by causing neuronal death or neuronal dysfunction [14][15][16][17]. Inhibiting the ability of these viruses to infect or kill neurons may be one of the key factors in being able to therapeutically treat viral encephalitis. Currently, there is a lack of therapeutic treatment for most cases of viral encephalitis [18,19]. Clinical management of most viral encephalitis cases is primarily limited to palliative care [20,21]. One of the few exceptions is the nucleoside analog drug, Acyclovir, which has been used to treat HSV-1, albeit with limited efficacy [22,23]. Thus, there is a strong need to identify and develop drugs that can effectively treat viral encephalitis.
One mechanism to identify potential candidate therapeutics is through drug screens of established drug libraries such as the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection (NPC) of FDA-approved drug library [24]. Established libraries can be screened with a range of drug concentrations for the effectiveness of each drug against virus-induced cell death using a readout of cell viability or virus production [24,25]. This is generally done using cell lines expressing a fluorescent or luciferase reporter readout or measuring virus-infection using a fluorescent or luciferase-tagged virus [24,26]. Other assays that are effective but do not necessarily have the same high-throughput capability are those that measure cell death such as apoptosis assays, dye-uptake cell viability assays such as MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) or XTT (2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-carboxanilide-2H-tetrazolium) assays or using an instrument which directly counts the number of alive cells such as a hemocytometer or cell counter [27][28][29][30].
In this manuscript, we discuss key considerations for analysis of compounds selected from an initial screen for encephalitic viruses. We discuss and provide detailed methodology of useful cell lines and primary cells as well as determining the efficacy and selective index for each compound and determining the direct mechanism of drug inhibition of the virus. Finally, we provide "proof of principle" data showing the ability of the drug, Rottlerin, to inhibit Zika virus (ZIKV)-induced damage of neurons. ZIKV is an arbovirus belonging to the family of Flaviviridae. Human transmission can occur after the bite of an infected Aedes species mosquito (Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus). However, it causes mainly asymptomatic to mild symptomatic infection with fever, headache, conjunctivitis, muscle and joint pain, etc., in adults. In some cases, it causes neurological diseases such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in adults and fetal abnormalities such as microcephaly and other severe brain defects in newborns [8]. To date, there are no licensed vaccines or therapeutic drugs to treat ZIKV-induced neurological disease. In this study, we utilize several of the below protocols to analyze the efficacy of Rottlerin, a polyphenol recently found to inhibit peribunyavirus replication in neurons [24], against ZIKV-induced neuronal damage.

Primary Neurons and Neuronal Cell Lines for Use in Testing Candidate Therapeutics
One of the important aspects is selecting cells or cell lines which were based on organ specificity of the virus infections and its ability to kill and replicate. There are several useful neuronal cell lines for testing the effect of drug inhibition of virus-induced cell death in neurons, including SH-SY5Y cells that have been well characterized [31], Neuro-2a, a mouse neuroblastoma cell line (ATCC CCL-131), and C17.2 cells, a retrovirus-transformed murine neural cell line [32]. Subsequent analysis of candidate compounds can then be completed on additional cell lines as well as human stem cells or mouse primary cortical neurons (described below) [33] to determine if the target drug consistently inhibits virus infection or virus-induced cell death, before testing in advanced model systems. Below is detailed information on several cell lines that can be used to study neurovirulent viruses. It is important to test these cell lines for ability to be infected with the virus being studied and to do a kinetic analysis of virus replication in the key cell lines. Remove the fetuses from the uterus, and place in a fresh petri dish with ice-cold dissection medium. Separate the head from the body by pulling. The tissue must always be kept submerged in the dissection medium. iii.

Primary Cortical Neuron Isolation
Remove the skin from the head and open the skull cap with forceps. Remove the brain and separate from the rest of the tissue. Separate the cortices from the brain and remove the meninges from the cerebral cortices. iv.
Collect all the cortices in a 15 mL conical centrifuge tube containing 4.5 mL dissection medium (at room temp). v.
Add 0.5 mL of 2.5% trypsin and incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 37 • C (invert tube halfway through). vi.
Gently remove supernatant with a sterile transfer pipet, leaving cortices at the bottom of the tube. vii.
Bring the volume to 15 mL with fresh dissection medium, invert the tube 3-4 times gently and let it stand for 5 min at room temperature. Repeat this to allow residual trypsin to diffuse from the tissue. Bring the final volume to 4 mL with neuron plating medium. viii.
Dissociate the cortices by gently pipetting up and down 10 times with a 10 mL pipet. Split into two 15 mL tubes, each with 2 mL of rough homogenate in them. Dissociate rough homogenate by putting through a 27-gauge needle on a 1 mL syringe approximately 10 times. ix.
Bring the volume to 10 mL with neuron plating medium. x.
Count the total number of cells: Add 10 µL of cell suspension and 10 µL of 0.4% filtered trypan blue in a 96-well plate, mix them well and load on a Neubauer chamber slide and count number of live cells in each corner square and take the average number per corner square and calculate total number of cells per mL using the formula.
Plate cells on amine-coated plate using neuronal plating medium. xii.
After 3-4 h, examine the dishes to ensure that most of the cells are attached, then aspirate the entire medium from all the wells and replace with neuronal maintenance medium. xiii.
Thereafter, replace 1/2 of the media with fresh neuronal maintenance media once per week.

Thawing of Cell Lines
These cells are quite fragile. Do not centrifuge immediately after thawing. Gently pipette contents of vial into 6-well plate. Plate two-fold dilutions of the cells: 500, 250, 125 µL with 3 mL of media per well. The media can then be replaced in 4-8 h after the cells adhere to remove the freezing media.
These cells grow as a mixture of floating and adherent cells. Remove the medium with the floating cells. ii.
Rinse the adherent cells with fresh 0.25% trypsin 0.53 mM EDTA solution, add an additional 1 to 2 mL of trypsin solution and let the culture sit at room temperature (or at 37 • C) until the cells detach, and recover the cells by centrifugation (5 min at 500 Gs). iii.
Add fresh medium, aspirate, combine with the floating cells recovered above and dispense into new flasks. An inoculum of 3 × 10 3 to 1 × 10 5 cells/cm 2 is recommended. iv.

Human Neuronal
Add sufficient amount of working solution to the culture flask or plate to cover the bottom surface of the culture vessels (8-10 mL for T-75 flask or 1 mL per well of 6-well plate or 0.5 mL per well of 12-and 24-well plate.) iv.
Incubate for 1 h at 37 • C in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 . v.
Remove the vessel and store it at 4 • C until use. vi.
Discard Fibronectin solution immediately before use and wash with PBS.
Thawing of Cell Line i. Warm 10 mL of KnockOut™ D-MEM/F-12 media in 15 mL centrifuge tube at 37 • C. ii.
Remove the frozen vial of NSC from nitrogen tank. Immediately transfer to water bath. iii.
Mix the thawed cells into prewarmed media in a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Spin down the cells at 500 G for 4-5 min. iv.
Resuspend cells in StemPro ® NSC SFM complete medium at 10 5 cells/mL and culture in a T-25 or T-75 flask coated with fibronectin as described in the previous section.
Culture Procedure i.
When cells are about 80% confluent, aspirate the medium and wash with DPBS. ii.
Add 1 mL of TrypLE™ Express to the flask and incubate at room temperature (or 37 • C) until the cells detach. Add 5-6 mL of fresh media and recover it in a 15 mL centrifuge tube. iii.
Spin down cells by centrifugation at 500 G for 4-5 min. iv.
Count cell numbers using hemocytometer as described in Section 2.1.5. v.
Plate cells in fresh StemPro ® NSC SFM complete medium at specific cell count for experiments on fibronectin-coated plates. Remove virus-containing media, wash with PBS and add fresh media at same volumes as described above. vi.

Selection of Cell Types for Drug Study against Zika Virus (ZIKV)
Multiple cell lines were analyzed for ZIKV infection and cell death ( Figure 1A). Cells were plated in 96-well plates using 1 × 10 4 to 4 × 10 4 cell/well depending upon cell size and infected at an MOI of 1.0 following the above protocol. At 4 dpi, cells were examined by light microscopy for cytopathic effect (CPE) as well as for cell viability using MTT assay (Section 4, below). The initial cell types screening results showed that SH-SY5Y and hNSCs produced CPE upon ZIKV infection ( Figure 1A). ZIKV induced approximately 80−90% cell death in hNSCs and 50-60% cell death in SH-SY5Y. No ZIKV-induced CPE or cell death was observed with mouse primary cortical neuron, N2a or C17.2 cells. Thus, we chose hNSCs for therapeutic drug studies. Comparison of 0.1, 1 and 10 MOIs for CPE and cell viability showed substantial cell death with 1 or 10 MOI but not 0.1 MOI ( Figure 1B,C). Further studies were done with 1 MOI.

Screens of Selected Compounds to Determine Efficacy
One of the important considerations in analyzing therapeutic compounds is their Selectivity Index (SI), the comparative effectiveness of the specific drug for inhibiting cell death relative to the toxicity of the compound for the same cell. As many drugs can induce host cell apoptosis or cell death alone, it is necessary to analyze increasing concentrations (two-fold dilution) of the drug in question to determine the median cell cytotoxicity concentration (CC 50 ), the concentration that results in 50% cell death of the host cell [24,34]. The effective concentration (EC 50 ) should also be measured by serial dilution as the concentration of the drug that produces 50% inhibition of virus-induced cell death [24,35,36]. The SI is then calculated by dividing the EC 50 by the CC 50 [24,37,38]. An SI that is substantially higher, i.e., a score of 10 or more, would be indicative of a drug that may provide therapeutic benefit and may be worthwhile to analyze in more advanced model systems such as organoid cultures or in vivo models of disease. The USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the evaluation of cytotoxicity and anti-viral efficacy of potential candidate drugs before any clinical testing [38].

In Vitro Anti-Viral MTT or XTT Assay
MTT or XTT assays can be used as a sensitive assay to measure cell death. In this assay, cell viability is measured by the formation of purple insoluble formazan crystals from yellow water-soluble dye MTT or XTT inside the viable cells by mitochondrial enzymes. Cytotoxicity of the candidate compounds as well as virus-induced cell death can be evaluated using MTT/XTT assays ( Figure 2). Thus, drug efficacy versus druginduced cytotoxicity can be measured with the same assay. For example, the median EC 50 of Acyclovir was 0.91 µg/mL by calculation inhibition of 50% virus-induced cytopathicity when it was tested against 351 isolates of HSV-2 [39]. Of them, seven isolates had EC 50 values ≥ 3 µg/mL, which were considered Acyclovir resistant. The drug Chloroquine, a 4-aminoquinoline and an FDA-approved drug to treat malaria, was shown to inhibit ZIKV in vitro [40,41]. The EC 50 concentration of chloroquine against ZIKV infection was 9.82-14.2 µM as assessed by cell viability using Vero cells, human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs) and NSC [41].  Remove the media and add fresh media containing two-fold dilution of the test drug. iii.
After 2 to 4 days incubation, remove media and wash with PBS (1×). iv.
Add fresh media containing 1/10 total volume of MTT stock reagent to each well. v.
Incubate the plate at 37 • C in dark for 3-4 h. (Reduce incubation times to 2 h if cell density is high.) vi.
Add 100 to 200 µL of STOP solution into each well and place on shaker for 30 min to 1 h at room temperature to lyse the cells and dissolve the formazan completely.
(Alternatively, you can pipet up and down several times to dissolve formazan but avoid air bubbles). vii.
Transfer 100 µL of the homogenous solution from each well into 96-well plates and measure the absorbance on an ELISA plate reader at 540 nm. viii.
Determine the percent viability of cells = (mean absorbance of drug treated sample/mean absorbance of control) × 100. ix.
Determine CC 50 (the cytotoxic concentration of the drugs to cause death of 50% of viable cells) by extrapolating dose−response curve.
• After determining the CC 50 , this concentration should be used as highest dose of the drug for efficacy study. Starting at this initial highest dose, use two to ten (log)-fold dilutions of decreasing concentrations of the drug for dose-response curve in efficacy study.

Assay Protocol for In Vitro Efficacy
i. Culture cells in 48-or 96-well plate using 10 3 to 10 5 cells per well (~80% confluent) and incubate for 4-6 h in 37 • C CO 2 incubator. ii.
Remove the media and infect with virus at 0.01-10.0 MOI. Add two to ten-fold dilutions of the test drug to wells and incubate 1 h. iii.
Remove the media and wash with PBS. iv.
Add fresh media (containing the same amount of test drug as before) to each well and incubate 2-7 days. v.
After 2-7 days of incubation, perform MTT/XTT assay (assay protocol for cytotoxicity) starting at step iii. vi.
After calculating the percentage of viable cells, determine the EC 50 or IC 50 and SI (CC 50 /EC 50 ) from the dose-response curve.

Anti-ZIKV activity of Rottlerin (RTL)
RTL is a polyphenol, first isolated from Asian plant Mallotus philippinensis. A previous report showed that RLT has a variety of beneficial potency such as an antioxidant [42], antiinflammatory [43,44], antiallergic [44], antibacterial [45,46] and anticancer activity [47,48]. RTL is a very versatile substance that has been used as a selective inhibitor of PKC-δ [49,50]. We recently showed that RTL inhibits La Crosse Virus (LACV)-induced cell death and virus replication in both human and murine neuronal cell lines [24]. To examine if RTL could also inhibit ZIKV, we tested the efficacy against ZIKV infection on hNSCs and Vero cells the above MTT assay. Cytotoxicity concentration of 50% (CC 50 ) for RTL was determined by plotting a dose-response cell survival curve ( Figure 3A,C). CC 50 of RTL was 2.37 ± 0.14 and 4.1 ± 0.32 µg/mL for hNSCs and Vero cells, respectively. To determine 50% effective concentration (EC 50 ), a similar assay was performed in the presence of ZIKV ( Figure 3B,D). The EC50 of RLT were 0.14 ± 0.03 and 0.48 ± 0.08 µg/mL in respective cell lines. The calculated selective index (SI) was 16.9 for hNSCs and 8.5 for Vero cells. Thus, RTL has a high SI to inhibit ZIKV-induced cell death in multiple cell lines.

Determination of Intra-Cellular or Extra-Cellular Virus by Plaque Assay from Drug-Treated Cells
Viral plaque assays can be used to determine the virus titer within cells or in cell supernatant in infected or drug-treated cultures ( Figure 4) [24,51]. In this assay, an infectious virus replicates to form a localized zone of infected or dead cells and form a 'plaque' which is detected by specific cellular stains. This method also helps to calculate the Inhibitory (effective) concentration 50% I(E)C 50 measured by serial dilution as the concentration of the drug that produces 50% inhibition in virus production or replication. The I(E)C50 can vary substantially between cell lines. This was observed with the nucleoside analog sofosbuvir, a commercially available RdRp inhibitor, which has been used to treat chronic HCV infection [52]. Sofosbuvir inhibited ZIKV replication with I(E)C50 range of 0.4-5 µM in SH-SY5Y, human placental choriocarcinoma (Jar) cells, and human hepatocellular carcinoma (Huh-7) cells. However, a much higher concentration for I(E)C50 of 32 µM was sound when tested in human fetal-derived hindbrain and cerebral cortex neuronal stem cells (NSCs) [53][54][55]. Assay protocol for intra-cellular or extra-cellular virus count: i.
Remove media and add fresh media containing virus at an MOI of 0.01-10.0 MOI. Add desired concentration of the test drug to wells and incubate 1 h. iii.
Remove media and wash with PBS or fresh media. iv.
Add fresh media containing same concentration of drug and incubate until desired time points.

For Extra-Cellular Virus
At specific time intervals, remove 100 µL of aliquot of cell supernatant, centrifuge to remove any cell debris and store supernatant at −80 • C. Add 100 µL of fresh media (containing test drug) and incubate until next time point. Analyze for virus using plaque assay described below.

For Intra-Cellular Virus a.
At desired time interval, remove the media and wash wells with fresh media. b.
Remove cells by trypsin or scrapping and centrifuge. c.
Freeze the cell suspension in dry ice or −80 • C freezer to disrupt the cell membrane. d.
Prior to plaque assay, thaw the cells using a 37 • C water bath and vortex. Allow plates to become confluent. iii.
Viral dilutions: Add 900 µL of 2% FBS-DMEM to small snap-cap tubes. Add 100 µL of sample to first tube, mix well, change pipette tip and transfer 100 µL to second tube. Repeat this process until desired dilutions are reached. Dilutions of 10 −1 to 10 −8 are usually sufficient to determine the amount of virus in each sample. Always run a positive control (known concentration of virus) and a negative control (media alone) for each assay. NOTE: If you want to conserve virus, make first dilution in 450 µL of media using 50 µL of virus. Rest of dilution scheme is the same. This dilution is rarely plated. iv.
Discard media from plated Vero cells into an appropriate waste container, leaving small amount of media to keep cell monolayer from drying out. v.
Starting from highest dilution, add 200 µL of diluted sample to each of three wells. Mix tube well before adding media/virus to the cells. vi.
Place in incubator for 1 h for adsorption and infection. vii.
Add 0.5 mL of warm 1.5% CMC directly to wells with media/virus. Place back in incubator for 5 days. NOTE: Do not touch the pipette to the wells while adding CMC. Add CMC from a height, otherwise you will contaminate the CMC in the bottle with virus.
viii. After 5 days, add 10% formaldehyde directly to fill wells, incubate at room temperature for at least 1 h. ix.
Pour off formaldehyde solution into appropriate container, rinse wells in tap water several times to remove all CMC. Do not spray directly into wells. x.
Add enough 0.35% crystal violet to cover bottom of each well, and let sit for 10 min. xi.
Pour off stain, and again wash gently with tap water as in step ix. xii.
Allow to dry at room temperature. xiii.
Plaque counting: Pick dilutions where plaques can be easily distinguished from each other for counting. Calculations: Virus titer (PFU/mL) = Number of Plaques x dilution factor x infection volume factor. Infection Volume factor: For, 200 µL = 5 For, 100 µL = 10

Extra-cellular and intra-cellular virus titer determination upon RTL treatment
We examined whether RTL inhibited ZIKV replication in hNSCs ( Figure 5). Virus titers were quantified to analyze the ( Figure 5A) release of infectious virus in the cell supernatant (extracellular) and ( Figure 5B) mature virus particles inside the cells (intracellular) using hNSCs. The plaque assay revealed that an EC 50 or 2xEC 50 dose of RTL significantly reduced virus production in cell supernatant (extra-cellular) by up to 2 logs ( Figure 5A) and intra-cellular infectious viruses by up to 1 log ( Figure 5B).

Determining When the Drug Affects Virus Infection: Time of Addition Assay
Time of addition assay is used to investigate the optimal time of drug addition either prior to infection, during infection or during replication [24,56]. This assay helps determine the basic mode of action of a drug on the stages of virus infection, replication and production (Table 1). i. Culture cells in 48-or 96-well plate using 2 × 10 4 or 1 × 10 4 cells per well and incubate for 6-9 h in incubator containing 5% CO 2 at 37 • C. ii.
Remove the media and infect with virus at 0.01-10.0 MOI as well as add 2-to-10-fold higher EC 50 concentration of the test drug and incubate for 1 h. iii.
Remove the media containing unbound virus and wash with PBS. iv.
Add fresh media (without drug) and incubate for 2-7 days. v.
Read out of MTT/XTT assay and/or virus titers.

c.
Post-treatment: i. Culture cells in 48-or 96-well plate using 10 3 to 10 6 cells per well and incubate for 6-9 h in incubator containing 5% CO 2 at 37 • C. ii.
Remove the media and infect with virus at 0.01-10.0 MOI. iii.
Remove the media containing unbound virus and wash with PBS. iv.
Add fresh media containing 2-to-10-fold EC 50 of test drug and incubate for 2-7 days. v.
Read out of MTT/XTT assay and/or virus titers.

d.
Throughout-treatment: This is the combination of previously described three treatment regimens (Pre-, Co-and Post-treatment with drug).

Virus Attachment Assay
The aim of this assay is to examine if the drug inhibits virus entry to the cells by neutralizing either virus or host cell receptor [29,56] • Use heparin sodium salt as a positive control [24,56].

Viral Inactivation Assay
The purpose is to determine if the drug directly affects the virus prior to cell infection ( Figure 6) [29,56].  Remove media and add diluted virus and drug mix and incubate 1 h. iv.
Remove media and wash with PBS or fresh media. v.
Add fresh media and reincubate cells in incubator. vi.
Harvest cell supernatant after desired time points vii.
Titrate the viruses using previously described plaque assay.

•
The 100-fold dilution helps to minimize the effect of the drugs in its effective dose and prevent significant interaction with host cells.

•
Use neutralizing antibody as a positive control [24].

Mode of action studies of RTL
Since RTL inhibited ZIKV production and cell death, we performed a time of addition assay to understand the basic antiviral mechanism and the timeframe of RTL's effect on ZIKV infection. hNSCs cells were treated with RTL (2xEC50) at pre-treatment, co-treatment, post-treatment or throughout-treatment and quantified the cell viability using MTT assay. RTL pre-and co-treatment did not protect against ZIKV (Figure 7). However, adding RLT at post and throughout time frames did significantly increase cell viability (Figure 7). This study suggests that the RTL inhibits ZIKV virus infection after entry to the cells, possibly by preventing virus replication or release. Further studies, including analysis of cellular localization of virus in RTL-treated cells, would be needed to directly determine the mode of action of inhibition. However, this study indicates that RTL prevents ZIKV-induced cell death by limiting virus replication in neuronal stem cells. Furthermore, this inhibition occurs post infection of the cell. Figure 7. Effect of time of addition of RTL (2xEC50 dose) on ZIKV-induced death of hNSCs. Cells were treated with RTL (2xEC50 dose) at pre-, co-, post-and throughout-treatment time frame of ZIKV infection. Each bar represents differences between six individual wells of a two-independent experiment. *** p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA using Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

Conclusions
The development of therapeutics that inhibit virus replication has often been difficult with only a limited number of compounds that have shown efficacy in limiting viral pathogenesis. Gaining a better understanding of the mechanism of drug inhibition as well as the timeline of when and how a compound inhibits virus replication in cell lines may help in improving the identification of key therapeutics. This is particularly important for diseases such as viral encephalitis or microcephaly, where a useful therapeutic would be required to inhibit virus infection and/or damage in the cells infected within the CNS, such as neurons. As cell types differ in their metabolism, analysis of the cell type of importance is critical to determine potential effectiveness of a compound. Of course, once clear candidate compounds have been identified by these studies, further studies with more complex systems including organoids and animal models need to be completed. However, the above strategy should help define which compounds should be followed up with those types of studies. Indeed, the current studies show that RTL, a polyphenol drug previously shown to inhibit La Crosse virus [24], also inhibits ZIKV-induced death of neurons. Possibly, RTL may be a useful compound to inhibit other encephalitic viruses as well.
Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive outline for testing small molecules or drugs for their efficacy over cell viability and viral replication. The methodology presented here includes detailed information on cell-based screening, validation and identification of basic mode of action of small molecules/drugs that can be easily extended into several other viruses by selecting relevant and susceptible cell lines [36,[57][58][59].