Abstract
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that mainly affects the lungs. COVID-19 symptoms include the presence of fevers, dry coughs, fatigue, sore throat, headaches, diarrhea, and a loss of taste or smell. However, it is understood that SARS-CoV-2 is neurotoxic and neuro-invasive and could enter the central nervous system (CNS) via the hematogenous route or via the peripheral nerve route and causes encephalitis, encephalopathy, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) in COVID-19 patients. This review discusses the possibility of SARS-CoV-2-mediated Multiple Sclerosis (MS) development in the future, comparable to the surge in Parkinson’s disease cases following the Spanish Flu in 1918. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a cytokine storm. This review highlights the impact of these modulated cytokines on glial cell interactions within the CNS and their role in potentially prompting MS development as a secondary disease by SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 is neurotropic and could interfere with various functions of neurons leading to MS development. The influence of neuroinflammation, microglia phagocytotic capabilities, as well as hypoxia-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration, are mechanisms that may ultimately trigger MS development.
1. Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected more than 174.9 million globally [1]. During the past two decades, three significant coronavirus outbreaks have been identified—SARS (November 2002), MERS (June 2012), and COVID-19 [2]. COVID-19 is the more infectious strain which prompted countries to enter lockdown with hampered trade, tourism, and education along with a quick expansion in health care systems to adjust to the increased scale of infected individuals and fatalities with an average death rate of around 2.16%. About 2.1 billion vaccine doses have been administered up to 10 June 2021 [1] (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Different types of coronavirus infections: their sources and intermediate hosts—SARS-CoV-1 (SARS), MERS CoV (MERS), and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Figure details on SARS-CoV-2; its genetics, transmission, and survival on various surfaces. Created with BioRender.com. Agreement number: SW232PTQT3.
COVID-19 exhibits highly heterogenous respiratory symptoms ranging from hypoxia cases associated with respiratory failure—acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)—to minor symptoms or asymptomatic conditions [3]. Significant clinical symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 include pneumonia, lower respiratory symptoms such as a cough and shortness of breath [4], fever, fatigue, and in some cases, it causes less common symptoms such as headaches, sputum production, diarrhea, and upper respiratory tract symptoms such as coryza breath [5,6,7]. Apart from the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the lungs, these viruses tend to impact the central nervous system (CNS) [7,8]. Evidence has shown that post-COVID syndrome includes brain fog and chronic fatigue syndrome [9,10] and about 33.62% of 236,379 COVID-19 patients showed neurological or psychiatric issues for the first time, which is alarming [11]. Thus, it is important to understand the neuro-invasiveness and neurotropic nature of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, it is essential to note that cases that exhibit headaches, a loss of smell and taste, confusion, dizziness, and impaired consciousness highlight an essential and influential link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the CNS [8,9,12,13]. A recent study on COVID-19 differentially expressed genes confers an association with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) development in the future [10]. Interestingly, previous studies have also shown an association of coronavirus with MS [13]. The Mouse Hepatitis Virus (MHV), a murine coronavirus-induced model, is a widely used in vivo model used to understand the demyelination mechanisms associated with MS. This review emphasizes the possible neuro-invasive route of SARS-CoV-2 and its association with encephalitis, encephalopathy, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and the possibility of developing MS and other neurological diseases as a secondary effect due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Invasion and the Effects on the Nervous System
The mode of zoonotic transfer of coronavirus from bats to humans in SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 is via an intermediate host such as civet cats, camels, and pangolins, respectively (Figure 1) [14]. SARS and SARS-CoV-2 enter humans via ACE2 receptors, mainly expressed in the lungs, brain, heart, blood vessels, gut, kidney, and testis [15]. Computational analysis has suggested that the zoonotic transfer of the SARS-CoV-2 virus occurs via a binding mechanism between ACE2 [16] and TMPRSS2 [17,18]. Apart from the generic respiratory complications caused by a SARS-CoV-2 infection, a plethora of evidence has supported the potential effect of SARS-CoV-2 on both the CNS and the peripheral nervous system (PNS) [13,14,19,20]. The effects of SARS-CoV-2 infections on the CNS include headache, loss of consciousness, vertigo, acute cerebrovascular disease, loss of muscle control (ataxia), and seizures, while the effects on the PNS include loss of smell, taste, vision, and episodes of neuropathic pain [19]. A recent study pointed out that the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 go far beyond the respiratory and sensorial dimensions and involve psychosensorial and neurological dimensions. Many of these neurological symptoms were present in 78 out of 214 hospitalized COVID-19 cases (36.4%) [21]. Furthermore, another study that included 1099 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection showed that they also suffered muscle pain, encephalitis, encephalopathy, epileptic seizures, stroke, rhabdomyolysis, and Guillain-Barre syndrome [22,23]. Moreover, genome sequencing confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of infected persons, proving the entry of SARS-CoV-2 and the effect on the CNS [24]. The following subsections will explain the potential neurological complications implicated in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are associated with encephalitis, encephalopathy, and ADEM. Several studies have concluded that SARS-CoV-2 is associated with encephalitis and encephalopathy, with a potential effect of viral infection on the CNS of these patients [25]. Encephalitis, the inflammation of the brain, is caused by direct infection by viruses known as acute encephalitis or due to an immune response corresponding to an infection known as ADEM. Acute encephalitis appears within days or periods of one or two weeks, interferes with the patient’s consciousness, and shows symptoms of headache, lack of orientation, and neurological issues [26]. ADEM is a rare demyelinating disease of the CNS which progresses rapidly with autoimmune processes followed by infection via viral exposures or immunization [27,28,29]. ADEM is associated with fever, meningitis, seizures, and unconsciousness. It is generally seen in children rather than adults [27,28,29], with a slight predominance in females rather than males [28]. Another well-known neurological complication is encephalopathy, which is a reversible brain dysfunction caused by metabolic disorders, systemic toxemia, or hypoxia during the acute infection generally characterized by cerebral edema. Patients with infectious toxic encephalopathy display headaches, mental disorders, disorientation, paralysis, loss of consciousness, and coma. Interestingly, COVID-19 patients have also reported viremia, severe hypoxia, and lately associated encephalopathy [24,30,31]; however, more studies are still needed to understand the pathophysiology behind the development of viral encephalitis or encephalopathy associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19.
Neuro-invasive and neurotropic SARS-CoV-2 exerts different infection stages, starting with a marked loss of smell and or taste during the early stages of infection to immunomodulatory effects affiliated with seizures at later stages [25]. Even though the brain is highly guarded and protected by the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and blood–CSF barriers protect the brain from the entry of external molecules, pathogens, and cells, the permeability of the BBB is strictly controlled by tight junctions (TJ) by continuous capillaries with no fenestrations [32,33,34]. As neurotropic viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 enter the CNS from the primary infection site, they invade the nervous tissues and disrupt its homeostasis, causing infections [24]. Inflammation of the CNS, known as neuroinflammation, includes both immunological and neuronal cells and results in a modulation of the immune response of the nervous system and synaptic plasticity [35]. The entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the CNS could occur via the hematogenous or peripheral nerve routes. The hematogenous route would be the main route for the neuro-invasiveness of SARS-CoV-2 and could be facilitated by the Trojan Horse mechanism, a mechanism by which the pathogen infects the CNS by crossing the BBB through transcellular, paracellular, and/or via infected phagocytic cells [36], which most of the neurotropic viruses adapt to enter the CNS. Neuro-invasion is mediated by the olfactory neurons and is initiated at the olfactory epithelium via bipolar cells, with its axons and dendrites reaching the olfactory bulb resulting in the formation of synapses across the cells [32,37]. Studies in transgenic rodent models that express human ACE2 have confirmed the transfer of coronaviruses from the nasal cavity to the CNS. The SARS-CoV viral antigen was detected in the olfactory bulb after 60 h and the brainstem after four days upon the intranasal administration of SARS-CoV in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice [37,38]. A recent study by Dube et al. in 2018 also confirmed coronavirus’s entry to the CNS via the olfactory bulb [37,39]. The virus’s entry to the CNS alters the neurons and marks the initial step for disease progression with its neurotropic nature and the associated immune response [37,40]. Collectively, this depicts the potential and impactful neurotropic influence of SARS-CoV-2 within the nervous system [37,41] (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Possible routes of entry of SARS-CoV-2 to the brain to cause infection: Blue color: confirmed entry routes. SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE-2 receptors in humans, migrates via the olfactory route, and crosses the BBB to enter the CNS to cause brain infection. SARS-CoV-2 could also mediate via an immune-mediated pathway to enter the CNS. Green color: Route that needs further study in association with SARS-CoV-2 includes virus-induced hypoxia and direct infection to the brain. Created with BioRender.com; Agreement number: LO232PSOFU.
4. Possible Mechanisms for Viral/SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Mediated MS Development
The exposure of a genetically susceptible person to a potential viral trigger from the environment leads to a cascade of autoimmune responses leading to demyelination and MS development. These insults interrupt the balance between myelin antigens in axons (as myelin sheets that surround axons) or oligodendrocytes (myelin-forming cells) and T-cells [62]. Viral entry to the CNS could initiate the first stage of MS progression involving various types of cells, mainly innate and adaptive immune cells, and glial cells [63]. The innate immune cells respond to an external stimulus by recognizing the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by PRRs, mainly by TLRs that are receptors expressed on the innate immune cells [63,64]. Effector mechanisms by the activated innate immune system include the production of nitric oxide and oxidative burst, the phagocytosis of nearby pathogens, apoptotic cells, and myelin sheaths, the production of chemokines and cytokines, antigen presentation to the adaptive immune cells, tropic factors secretion and the release of MMPs that disturbs the extracellular matrix and the BBB [63]. Signals from the innate immune system activate the adaptive immune system to expand the T-cells and B-cells [64].
With the exponential knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the presence/ability of coronavirus to develop MS in patients and in in vivo models, one may predict a future wave of MS similar to Parkinson’s disease following the influenza pandemic of 1918 (The Spanish Flu) [65]. Apart from coronavirus, herpes viruses such as the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), the herpes simplex virus (HSV-1 and HSV-2), the cytomegalovirus (CMV), the human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), and the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) are known as triggers in MS development (Table 1). Moreover, viruses such as the human polyomavirus 2 or John Cunningham virus (JCV) and the Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs-H and W) are also associated with MS predisposition through the increase in neuroinflammation [66,67]. The following section discusses the possible mechanisms that could mediate MS development due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Table 1.
Classification, Properties, and CNS Entry Routes of Viruses associated with MS.
4.1. Cytokine Storm and Neuroinflammation
Clinical data confirm an association of an immunological effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to a cytokine storm. A cytokine storm is characterized as a critical immune response which prompts the hyperactivation and proliferation of immune cells such as natural killer cells, macrophages, and T-cells [68] with glial cell activation in the CNS, causing neuroinflammation demyelination [25,27,69]. Cytokine profiling of COVID-19 samples mainly with patients admitted in the intensive care unit has shown an increase in IL-2, IL-7, GM-CSF, IFN- γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10; CXCL10), MCP-1, MIP-1, and TNF- α [69] which could cause viral-induced hyper-inflammation [69,70]. Moreover, severe cases of COVID-19 cases have shown an increase in IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8 (CXCL8), IL-17, IFN-γ, and GM-CSF [70] (Figure 3/Table 2).
Figure 3.
Possible ways by which SARS-CoV-2 leads to MS. Within the CNS, neurotropic and neurotoxic SARS CoV-2 would interfere with demyelination/remyelination, neurodegeneration, Neuroinflammation and synaptic loss of neurons leading to MS progression. Possible ways: (A) Cytokine storm and increased demyelination- entry of SARS-CoV-2 could activate immune cells (macrophages and T-cells) and glial cells, with increased expression of several cytokines, interleukins and chemokines thereby leading to demyelination [75,79,80,81]. (B) Hypoxia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and (C) Reduced phagocytosis of myelin sheath debris, SARS-CoV-2 might decrease the phagocytic capacity of microglia cells, and macrophages of myelin sheath debris; accumulation of myelin sheath debris hinder the access of the remyelinating cells such as Schwann cells causing MS; Blue coded cytokines, interleukins, and chemokines represent the molecules involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection [70]. Created with BioRender.com; Agreement number: ZK232PROSX.
Table 2.
List of cytokines/chemokines associated with the cytokine storm in SARS-CoV-2 infection association with MS.
In viral infections, this cytokine storm leads to the apoptosis of the lungs’ epithelial and endothelial cells, resulting in vascular leakage, hypoxia, and alveolar edema [68]. Upon a pathogenic insult to the organism, viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 itself or the cytokines could cross the BBB via transporters and circumventricular organs and activate the glial cells, mostly microglia initiating an intricate neuroinflammatory signaling cascade with the release of several cytokine and chemokines [35]. In the CNS, the infiltration of various immune cells and cytokines released from these cells leads to an inflammation of white and gray matter (Neuroinflammation), leading to MS development. This includes the association between the myelin-specific T helper (Th) cells and MHC class II, presenting alleles and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [62,71]. The ligand-binding receptor of PAMPs in viruses or bacteria binds to TLRs expressed on the cell surface, leading to the release of various cytokines such as IL-4, IL-12, and IL-23. In the presence of these cytokines, CD4+ T cells differentiate into helper T-cells: Th1 (pro-inflammatory), Th2 (anti-inflammatory), or Th17 (pro-inflammatory) phenotypes releasing specific cytokines. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ are released by the Th1 cells which suppress the differentiation of Th2 cells. The anti-inflammatory role of Th2 cells is exerted by IL-4 and IL-13, of which IL-4 decreases inflammation via activation and an increase in M1 and M2 (repair) macrophages. The anti-inflammatory role of IL-13 is exerted via the release of MMPs. IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-26 mediate the inflammatory response of the Th17 cells in MS [71]. CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg) cells play a role in suppressing the excessive inflammatory responses by inhibiting the proliferative, functional and migrative capacity of the effector T-cells via secreting cytokines or cell-surface molecules. Treg cells also promote remyelination; however, the capacity of the Treg cells has been found to be altered in MS patients [72].
Neuroinflammation is associated with the release of numerous pro-inflammatory factors such as TNFα, IL-1β and nitric oxide free radicals leading to the subsequent recruitment of more macrophages and microglia to the CNS to remove the cell debris produced during the neural injury. This continual exposure of neurons to pro-inflammatory cytokines results in neuronal dysfunction and degeneration that is mainly associated with the development of age-related neurodegenerative diseases [73]. Activation of astrocytes by pro-inflammatory cytokines, stress (oxidative or chemical), pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) leads to the expression or upregulation of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β), chemokines (CCL2, CCL20, and CXCL10), neurotrophic factors including nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), major histocompatibility complex (MHC)- class II cell adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and TLRs [74,75]. These molecules play a crucial role in killing the invading pathogens; however, they also exert bystander damage to the adjacent glial cells and neurons [73] (Figure 3A).
Lesions of MS are associated with several demyelinated plaques within the white matter accompanied by a cluster of several inflammatory cells such as activated microglia, lymphocytes, and macrophages [43,44,76]. Inflammatory and neurotoxic responses in MS lesions by reactive astrocytes cause tissue damage via the manipulation of glutamate (increased) and redox homeostasis [74]. However, astrocytes play a central role in dampening the inflammation, thereby promoting neuroprotection and repairing lesions in MS [74]. Scattered plagues in MS formed due to demyelination are enclosed with reactive astrocytes and might exert emperipolesis, where the astrocyte engulfs one or more cells such as oligodendrocytes [77] or lymphocytes [78]. However, the role of emperipolesis in MS is yet not exact. Demyelination is also associated with cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ T cells) [62,71], which releases perforin-pore forming cytolytic protein that has defined roles in suppressing and inactivating T-helper cells (CD4+ T cells). Perforin promotes astrocyte activation, disrupts tight junction organization, and increases vascular permeability of CNS [62,71,79]. Perforin induces apoptosis in oligodendrocytes leading to repair of myelin sheath in the CNS [71]. Calcium ions could mediate this. In MS, oligodendrocytes are reduced in numbers and show signs of stress and apoptosis, swelling with complement deposition, and cell lysis.
4.2. Hypoxia Mediated Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration
Recent findings on the mitochondrial involvement in MS pathogenesis [82,83] are exciting, and these correlate with another probable secondary effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated encephalopathy is related to hypoxia [84], and hypoxia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction could be a possible mechanism for the progression of MS in these patients. Mitochondria play a vital role in regulating calcium and ATP synthesis and constitute a significant source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Mitochondria have a key role in maintaining a cellular environment’s bioenergetics via KREBS’s Cycle and Oxidative phosphorylation, cell-signaling, calcium storage, and apoptosis [85]. In the CNS, the mitochondrial metabolic activity would also be associated with an impaired Krebs cycle or neuronal oxidative phosphorylation [82]. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to intracellular dysregulation and lower energy production resulting in neuronal damage, which is highly dependent on ATP for the transmission of electric signals and interrupts the anterograde and retrograde transportation across the axons [86]. Therefore, as mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in MS development [85,86], there is a possibility that SARS-CoV-2 infection could lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and further accelerate progression to MS development (Figure 3B). However, this needs to be further investigated.
4.3. Altering the Phagocytotic Capability of Microglia/Macrophage
SARS-CoV-2 could alter the demyelination/remyelination equilibrium by microglia and macrophages in the brain, and this could result in the accumulation of myelin sheath debris and MS development. Both microglia and macrophages are of myeloid origin and play a crucial role in phagocytosis. As the resident macrophage cells in the CNS, microglia mostly have a role in removing cell debris after ischemia or damage to the myelin sheaths [62,87] and this is a crucial process for efficient remyelination followed by the demyelination of axons. Microglial phagocytosis occurs during neuronal connection restructuring, acute CNS injury, MS, and ageing via three main mechanisms [88]:
- (a)
- Phagocytosis of myelin and extracellular aggregates such as amyloid-β particles;
- (b)
- Release of growth factor, neurotrophic factors, and anti-inflammatory cytokines would stimulate axon branching and repair myelin sheaths;
- (c)
- Recruitment of stem cells and other precursor cells and the triggering of astrocytes to release trophic factors that would neurons to develop and maintain synaptic connections.
Accumulation of myelin sheath debris leads to the formation of a dense matrix surrounding demyelinated axons, thereby blocking the remyelinating cells to demyelination sites. Hence, the efficient removal of myelin sheath debris would ease the access of remyelinating cells to the demyelinated axons. This accumulation of myelin sheath debris could also affect remyelination by blocking the maturation of the oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Studies in the demyelination model by Kotter et al. observed impaired remyelination with decreased macrophages and microglia with decreased removal of myelin sheaths debris [89,90]. Hence, a possible MS development mechanism due to SARS-CoV-2 infection could be via accumulation of myelin sheath debris due to fewer microglia/macrophages in CNS (Figure 3C). Thus SARS-CoV-2 could increase the stride of demyelination of axons in CNS leading to MS progression by interrupting the phagocytotic role of macrophages/ microglia and thereby hindering remyelination.
5. Conclusions
Currently, the world is in a race against the COVID-19 pandemic, with a significant focus on patient care and substantial research in developing and implementing strategies to eliminate the virus’s spread. Coronavirus is considered to be one of the most invasive viruses in history that can even invade brain cells directly. However, the current clinical data have yet to uncover the budding effects of SARS-CoV-2 within the CNS and its potentially severe consequences in the coming years. Many studies have confirmed the existence of neurological issues as a long-term effect associated with post-COVID-19 infection. The immediate neurological complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 include encephalitis, encephalopathy, and ADEM [24]. Moreover, one should not ignore the consideration of the prospective negative impacts as the coronavirus could achieve a latent growth phase and later recur to prompt different neurological diseases, such as MS. This review draws insight into the possible mechanisms associated with MS development in SARS-CoV-2 infected people. Since MS is known to occur at any age, the onset usually occurs between 15 and 55 years and COVID-19 is a relatively new disease affecting more adults than young, further studies and investigations are necessary for a better understanding of the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to MS. Notably, cytokines and chemokines are modulated in SARS-CoV-2 infection and can interfere in the interplay of the glial cells in MS development. There is a necessity to consider hypoxia-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and alteration in the phagocytic capacity of microglia/ macrophages in the development of MS. Unwinding MS pathophysiology to the lurking coronavirus could potentially help in the early detection of MS in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and result in better medical care.
Future Perspectives
Many studies have confirmed the existence of neurological issues as a long-term effect associated with post COVID-19 infection. As there is a potential risk of MS pathogenesis as a secondary effect of SARS-CoV-2 disease, future MS development cannot be ruled out; hence, a constant and continuous follow-up of exposed patients would be hugely beneficial. Moreover, this could help better understand and identify factors that may contribute to disease development during the early stages of MS and its staged progression. Consequently, this would provide further insight into effective treatment strategies and intervention and reduce the risk of developing MS or its progression. Furthermore, studies could focus more on the hypoxia and phagocytotic role of microglia during a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unwinding MS pathophysiology to the lurking coronavirus could potentially help early detect MS in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and could result in better medical care.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.J.S., S.S.-A. and S.A.A.; Investigation, N.J.S., S.S.-A. and S.A.A.; Supervision, S.S.-A. and S.A.A.; Visualization, N.J.S., S.S.-A. and S.A.A.; Writing—Original Draft, N.J.S., S.S.-A. and S.A.A.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.S.-A., S.A.A.; supervision, S.S.-A. and S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding. Publication charges were supported by QBRI internal grant (QB16).
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Faizal Sherif for creating the figures using BioRender.com, accessed on 16 July 2021.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
| ACE2 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 |
| ADEM | Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis |
| ARDS | Acute respiratory distress syndrome |
| BBB | Blood-brain barrier |
| BDNF | Brain-derived neurotrophic factor |
| BMEC | Brain microvascular endothelium cells |
| CNS | Central nervous system |
| CSF | Cerebrospinal fluid |
| COVID-19 | Coronavirus disease 2019 |
| CCL-CXCL | Chemokines |
| CLR | C-type lectin receptors |
| CD8+ | T cells Cytotoxic T cells |
| CD4+ | T cells T-helper cells |
| FLAIR | Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery |
| LIF | Leukaemia inhibitory factor |
| MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
| MHC | Major histocompatibility complex |
| MMPs | Matrix metalloproteinase |
| MHV | Mouse Hepatitis Virus |
| MS | Multiple Sclerosis |
| NGF | Nerve growth factor |
| NG2 | Nerve/glial antigen 2 |
| PAMP | Pathogen-associated molecular patterns |
| PRR | Pattern recognition receptors |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| RNA | Ribonucleic acid |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus |
| Th | Helper T-cells |
| TJ | Tight junctions |
| TLR | Toll-like receptors |
| Treg | Regulatory T cells |
| TNF | Tumour necrosis factor |
| VEGF | Vascular endothelial growth factor |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
References
- World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 12 June 2021. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/# (accessed on 13 June 2021).
- Song, Z.; Xu, Y.; Bao, L.; Zhang, L.; Yu, P.; Qu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, W.; Han, Y.; Qin, C. From SARS to MERS, Thrusting Coronaviruses into the Spotlight. Viruses 2019, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gandhi, M.; Yokoe, D.S.; Havlir, D.V. Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles’ Heel of Current Strategies to Control Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2158–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guarner, J. Three Emerging Coronaviruses in Two Decades. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020, 153, 420–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuki, K.; Fujiogi, M.; Koutsogiannaki, S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 215, 108427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, Y.; Yang, H.; Ji, W.; Wu, W.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Duan, G. Virology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Control of COVID-19. Viruses 2020, 12, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lake, M.A. What we know so far: COVID-19 current clinical knowledge and research. Clin. Med. 2020, 20, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Needham, E.J.; Chou, S.H.-Y.; Coles, A.J.; Menon, D.K. Neurological Implications of COVID-19 Infections. Neurocrit. Care 2020, 32, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bornstein, S.R.; Voit-Bak, K.; Donate, T.; Rodionov, R.N.; Gainetdinov, R.R.; Tselmin, S.; Kanczkowski, W.; Müller, G.M.; Achleitner, M.; Wang, J.; et al. Chronic post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a role for extracorporeal apheresis? Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, A.C.; Kern, F.; Losada, P.M.; Agam, M.R.; Maat, C.A.; Schmartz, G.P.; Fehlmann, T.; Stein, J.A.; Schaum, N.; Lee, D.P.; et al. Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021, 595, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taquet, M.; Geddes, J.R.; Husain, M.; Luciano, S.; Harrison, P.J. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry 2021, 8, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, M.; Ren, Y.; Lv, T. Encephalitis as a clinical manifestation of COVID-19. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 88, 945–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moriguchi, T.; Harii, N.; Goto, J.; Harada, D.; Sugawara, H.; Takamino, J.; Ueno, M.; Sakata, H.; Kondo, K.; Myose, N.; et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 94, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ye, Z.-W.; Yuan, S.; Yuen, K.-S.; Fung, S.-Y.; Chan, C.P.; Jin, D.-Y. Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1686–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Verdecchia, P.; Cavallini, C.; Spanevello, A.; Angeli, F. The pivotal link between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2020, 76, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andersen, K.G.; Rambaut, A.; Lipkin, W.I.; Holmes, E.C.; Garry, R.F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sungnak, W.; Huang, N.; Bécavin, C.; Berg, M.; Queen, R.; Litvinukova, M.; Talavera-López, C.; Maatz, H.; Reichart, D.; Sampaziotis, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche1, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, L.; Jin, H.; Wang, M.; Hu, Y.; Chen, S.; He, Q.; Chang, J.; Hong, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, D.; et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baig, A.M. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020, 26, 499–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pallanti, S. Importance of SARs-Cov-2 anosmia: From phenomenology to neurobiology. Compr. Psychiatry 2020, 100, 152184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carod-Artal, F.J. Neurological complications of coronavirus and COVID-19. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 70, 311–322. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, Y.; Jakimovski, D.; Ramanathan, M.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Zivadinov, R. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: From molecular pathophysiology to in vivo imaging. Neural Regener. Res. 2019, 14, 373. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Duan, J.; Hashimoto, K.; Yang, L.; Liu, C.; Yang, C. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain, Behav. Immun. 2020, 87, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zanin, L.; Saraceno, G.; Panciani, P.P.; Renisi, G.; Signorini, L.; Migliorati, K.; Fontanella, M.M. SARS-CoV-2 can induce brain and spine demyelinating lesions. Acta Neurochir. 2020, 162, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellul, M.; Solomon, A.T. Acute encephalitis—Diagnosis and management. Clin. Med. 2018, 18, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parsons, T.; Banks, S.; Bae, C.; Gelber, J.; Alahmadi, H.; Tichauer, M. COVID-19-associated acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). J. Neurol. 2020, 267, 2799–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Javed, A.; Khan, O. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 123, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Anilkumar, A.C.; Foris, L.A.; Tadi, P. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM). In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Poyiadji, N.; Shahin, G.; Noujaim, D.; Stone, M.; Patel, S.; Griffith, B. COVID-19-associated Acute Hemorrhagic Necrotizing Encephalopathy: CT and MRI Features. Radiology 2020, 2020, 01187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Filatov, A.; Sharma, P.; Hindi, F.; Espinosa, P.S. Neurological Complications of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Encephalopathy. Cureus 2020, 12, e7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bohmwald, K.; Gálvez, N.M.S.; Ríos, M.; Kalergis, A.M. Neurologic Alterations Due to Respiratory Virus Infections. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulgar, V.M. Transcytosis to Cross the Blood Brain Barrier, New Advancements and Challenges. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erickson, M.A.; Rhea, E.M.; Knopp, R.C.; Banks, W.A. Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with the Blood–Brain Barrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, P.G.; Nani, J.V.; Oses, J.P.; Brietzke, E.; Hayashi, M.A. Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation in mental disorders. Brain, Behav. Immun.-Heal. 2020, 2, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulzova, L.; Bhide, M.R.; Andrej, K. Pathogen translocation across the blood-brain barrier. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 57, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conde Cardona, G.; Quintana Pájaro, L.D.; Quintero Marzola, I.D.; Ramos Villegas, Y.; Moscote Salazar, L.R. Neurotropism of SARS-CoV 2: Mechanisms and manifestations. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 412, 116824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Netland, J.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Moore, S.; Cassell, M.; Perlman, S. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection Causes Neuronal Death in the Absence of Encephalitis in Mice Transgenic for Human ACE2. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 7264–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dubé, M.; Le Coupanec, A.; Wong, A.H.; Rini, J.M.; Desforges, M.; Talbot, P.J. Axonal Transport Enables Neuron-to-Neuron Propagation of Human Coronavirus OC43. J. Virol. 2018, 92, 00404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Swanson, P.A., 2nd; McGavern, D.B. Viral diseases of the central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 11, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Baig, A.M.; Khaleeq, A.; Ali, U.; Syeda, H. Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host–Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dale, R.; Branson, J. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis or multiple sclerosis: Can the initial presentation help in establishing a correct diagnosis? Arch. Dis. Child. 2005, 90, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Cerdá, F.; Sánchez-Gómez, M.V.; Matute, C. The link of inflammation and neurodegeneration in progressive multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler. Demyelinating Disord. 2016, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donati, D. Viral infections and multiple sclerosis. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Models 2020, 32, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, X.; Federoff, H.J. Immune responses in Parkinson’s disease: Interplay between central and peripheral immune systems. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 275178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Musella, A.; Gentile, A.; Rizzo, F.R.; De Vito, F.; Fresegna, D.; Bullitta, S.; Vanni, V.; Guadalupi, L.; Bassi, M.A.U.S.; Buttari, F.; et al. Interplay Between Age and Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis: Effects on Motor and Cognitive Functions. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nisticò, R.; Mori, F.; Feligioni, M.; Nicoletti, F.; Centonze, D. Synaptic plasticity in multiple sclerosis and in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rossi, S.; Furlan, R.; De Chiara, V.; Motta, C.; Studer, V.; Mori, F.; Musella, A.; Bergami, A.; Muzio, L.; Bernardi, G.; et al. Interleukin-1β causes synaptic hyperexcitability in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 71, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, S. Demyelinating diseases. J. Clin. Pathol. 2006, 59, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhn, S.; Gritti, L.; Crooks, D.; Dombrowski, Y. Oligodendrocytes in Development, Myelin Generation and Beyond. Cells 2019, 8, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Owens, G.P.; Gilden, D.; Burgoon, M.P.; Yu, X.; Bennett, Y.L. Viruses and multiple sclerosis. Neuroscientist 2011, 17, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burks, J.S.; DeVald, B.L.; Jankovsky, L.D.; Gerdes, J.C. Two Coronaviruses Isolated from Central Nervous System Tissue of Two Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Science 1980, 209, 933–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, J.N.; Mounir, S.; Talbot, P.J. Human coronavirus gene expression in the brains of multiple sclerosis patients. Virology 1992, 191, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matías-Guiu, J.; Gomez-Pinedo, U.; Montero-Escribano, P.; Gomez-Iglesias, P.; Porta-Etessam, J.; .Matias-Guiu, J.A. Should we expect neurological symptoms in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic? Neurologia 2020, 35, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatch, M.N.; Schaumburg, C.S.; Lane, T.E.; Keirstead, H.S. Endogenous remyelination is induced by transplant rejection in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 212, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helms, J.; Kremer, S.; Merdji, H.; Clere-Jehl, R.; Schenck, M.; Kummerlen, C.; Collange, O.; Boulay, C.; Fafi-Kremer, S.; Ohana, M.; et al. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2268–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palao, M.; Fernández-Díaz, E.; Gracia-Gil, J.; Romero-Sánchez, C.; Díaz-Maroto, I.; Segura, T. Multiple sclerosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020, 45, 102377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Novi, G.; Rossi, T.; Pedemonte, E.; Saitta, L.; Rolla, C.; Roccatagliata, L.; Inglese, M.; Farinini, D. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 7, e797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reichard, R.R.; Kashani, K.B.; Boire, N.A.; Constantopoulos, E.; Guo, Y.; Lucchinetti, C.F. Neuropathology of COVID-19: A spectrum of vascular and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2020, 140, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smyk, D.S.; Alexander, A.K.; Walker, M.; Walker, M. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis progressing to multiple sclerosis: Are infectious triggers involved? Immunol. Res. 2014, 60, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.J. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: Differential diagnosis from multiple sclerosis on the basis of clinical course. Korean J. Pediatr. 2011, 54, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, D.; Biswas, K.; Nag, S.; Ramachandra, S.G.; Das Sarma, J. Microglia Play a Major Role in Direct Viral-Induced Demyelination. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayo, L.; Quintana, F.J.; Weiner, H.L. The innate immune system in demyelinating disease. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 248, 170–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kielian, T. Toll-like receptors in central nervous system glial inflammation and homeostasis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2006, 83, 711–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henry, J.; Smeyne, R.; Jang, H.; Miller, B.; Okun, M. Parkinsonism and neurological manifestations of influenza throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. Park. Relat. Disord. 2010, 16, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marrodan, M.; Alessandro, L.; Farez, M.F.; CORREALE, J. The role of infections in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2019, 25, 891–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarlinton, R.E.; Martynova, E.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Khaiboullina, S.; Verma, S. Role of viruses in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Viruses 2020, 12, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, X.; Wang, T.; Cai, D.; Hu, Z.; Chen, J.; Liao, H.; Zhi, L.; Wei, H.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Cytokine storm intervention in the early stages of COVID-19 pneumonia. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020, 53, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmati, M.; Moosavi, A.M. Cytokine-targeted therapy in severely ill COVID-19 patients: Options and cautions. Mortality 2020, 4, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemi, N.; Razavi, S.; Nikzad, E. Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenesis, Symptoms, Diagnoses and Cell-Based Therapy. Cell J. 2017, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Kimura, K. Regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 11, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peferoen, L.; Kipp, M.; Van Der Valk, P.; van Noort, J.; Amor, S. Oligodendrocyte-microglia cross-talk in the central nervous system. Immunology 2014, 141, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ponath, G.; Park, C.; Pitt, D. The Role of Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nutma, E.; Van Gent, D.; Amor, S.; Peferoen, L.A.N. Astrocyte and Oligodendrocyte Cross-Talk in the Central Nervous System. Cells 2020, 9, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Henstridge, C.M.; Tzioras, M.; Paolicelli, R.C. Glial Contribution to Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Loss in Neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ghatak, N.R. Occurrence of oligodendrocytes within astrocytes in demyelinating lesions. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1992, 51, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furer, M.; Hartloper, V.; Wilkins, J.; Nath, A. Lymphocyte Emperipolesis in Human Glial Cells. Cell Adhes. Commun. 1993, 1, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, H.L.; Willenbring, R.C.; Jin, F.; Manhart, W.A.; Lafrance, S.J.; Pirko, I.; Johnson, A.J. Perforin Competent CD8 T Cells Are Sufficient to Cause Immune-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, e111401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Balabanov, R.; Strand, K.; Goswami, R.; McMahon, E.; Begolka, W.; Miller, S.D.; Popko, B. Interferon-gamma-oligodendrocyte interactions in the regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 2013–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kostianovsky, A.M.; Maier, L.M.; Anderson, R.C.; Bruce, J.N.; Anderson, D.E. Astrocytic Regulation of Human Monocytic/Microglial Activation. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 5425–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathur, D.; López-Rodas, G.; Casanova, B.; Burgal Marti, M. Perturbed glucose metabolism: Insights into multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. Front. Neurol. 2014, 5, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regenold, W.T.; Phataka, P.; Makley, M.J.; Stone, R.D.; Klinge, M.A. Cerebrospinal fluid evidence of increased extra-mitochondrial glucose metabolism implicates mitochondrial dysfunction in multiple sclerosis disease progression. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 275, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Almeida, A.; Esteban, M.D.; Bolanos, J.; Medina, J.M. Oxygen and glucose deprivation induces mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurones but not in astrocytes in primary culture. J. Neurochem. 2002, 81, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barcelos, I.P.; Troxell, R.M.; Graves, J.S. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Multiple Sclerosis. Biology 2019, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Su, K.; Bourdette, D.; Forte, M. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jacobs, A.H.; Tavitian, B. Noninvasive molecular imaging of neuroinflammation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32, 1393–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neumann, H.; Kotter, M.R.; Franklin, R.J. Debris clearance by microglia: An essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain 2009, 132 Pt 2, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kotter, M.; Setzu, A.; Sim, F.; Van Rooijen, N.; Franklin, R.J. Macrophage depletion impairs oligodendrocyte remyelination following lysolecithin-induced demyelination. Glia 2001, 35, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawji, K.S.; Mishra, M.K.; Yong, V.W. Regenerative Capacity of Macrophages for Remyelination. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).