Dwarf Mistletoe and Drought Contribute to Growth Decline, Dieback and Mortality of Junipers

: Rising temperatures and aridiﬁcation, combined with the stressing effect of some hemiparasitic plants such as mistletoes, may contribute to reduce vigour and growth of trees and shrubs leading to dieback and increasing mortality. This has been rarely explored in pioneer shrubs such as junipers, which are assumed to be more drought tolerant than coexisting trees. To test these ideas, we reconstructed radial growth patterns of common junipers ( Juniperus communis L.) with different crown cover and infestation degree by dwarf mistletoe ( Arceuthobium oxycedri (DC.) M. Bieb.) in two sites with contrasting aspect and water availability located in north-eastern Spain. We used dendrochronology to study the response of junipers’ radial growth to climatic factors (temperature, precipitation, and soil moisture), an index of drought severity, and mistletoe infestation. Juniper growth was constrained by elevated temperatures and low precipitation leading to drought during the growing season. Infestation by dwarf mistletoe contributed to a short-term growth decline in junipers. The interaction between low summer precipitation and high dwarf mistletoe infestation constrained juniper growth, particularly in the north-oriented wetter site, where hosts presented higher growth rates during wet periods. The negative impact of low summer precipitation on juniper growth overrides the effects due to dwarf mistletoe infestation. Aridiﬁcation and mistletoe infestation could trigger dieback and mortality of shrubs slowing down successional dynamics and delaying shrub encroachment into former croplands and grasslands.


Introduction
Some regions of the Mediterranean Basin have experienced aridification trends after the 1950s due to increasingly warmer conditions [1]. According to tree-ring reconstructions of droughts in the Mediterranean Basin, the recent dry spells in the late 20th century and early 21st century were among the most severe of the past millennium [2]. Such severe and increasingly hotter and drier droughts have been linked to forest dieback episodes characterized by growth and productivity declines, rapid leaf shedding and rises in mortality rates [3,4].
It could be speculated that such forest dieback events would trigger a greater dominance of shrubs in the driest sites where tree establishment is hindered by aridification. Several pioneer, shade-intolerant shrub species dominate treeless, xeric sites in steppe and mountain Mediterranean regions (e.g., Genista Scorpius (L.) DC., Salvia rosmarinus (L.) Schleid., Thymus vulgaris L., etc.), where they are encroaching into grasslands as traditional land-use activities (pastures, extensive agriculture, etc.) cease or decrease their intensity [5]. This is the case of junipers, which are also vulnerable to drought stress because they are anisohydric species, i.e., they show a loose regulation of stomatal conductance rates as soil water decreases, and depend on shallow soil water sources [6][7][8]. These ecophysiological gentle slopes (5-15°) and it is considered the drier site, while the second site, called "Ribazada" (40°34′22″ N, 0°39′41″ W, 1350 m a.s.l.) is situated on north-oriented slopes of similar steepness and it is considered the wetter site. In both sites, soils are calcareous.
The climate in the study area is continental Mediterranean, characterized by cold winters and dry, warm summers. According to local climate data from the "Alcalá de la Selva" station (40°22′ N, 0°43′ W, 1404 m a.s.l.; reference period 1950-2020), located ca. 32 and 30 km apart from the "Aliaga" and "Ribazada" study sites, respectively, annual precipitation is 572 mm and the mean annual temperature is 11.2 °C. The mean minimum and maximum monthly temperatures are −1.9 °C (January) and 25.5 °C (August), respectively.
(a) (b) (c) Figure 1. Views of (a) a common juniper population affected by dwarf mistletoe with abundant dead or declining individuals, and junipers (b) moderately and (c) severely infected by dwarf mistletoe.

Study Mistletoe and Host Species
The dwarf mistletoe (A. oxycedri) is a small (plant width varies 5-25 cm), dioecious, evergreen plant that can inhabit the same host over several generations and disperses through explosive seed discharges [19,33]. This dwarf mistletoe shows the widest distribution area of the 42 recognized species of Arceuthobium affecting juniper species over 100° of longitude from the western Mediterranean Basin (Spain and Morocco) to central Asia [20].
The common juniper (J. communis) is the most widely distributed gymnosperm species, being found across the whole Northern Hemisphere, in Eurasia and North America [18]. It is an evergreen, slow-growing, shade-intolerant, usually dioecious conifer appearing in harsh environments (continental or cold sites) over all types of soils, particularly on rocky substrates or on soils with low nutrient concentrations [18]. Its radial growth is reduced by low precipitation and soil water availability in dry Mediterranean areas and by low growing-season temperatures in cold boreal regions [34].

Field Sampling and Measurements of Ring-Width Series
Field sampling was carried out during April 2017 (Aliaga site) and August 2020 (La Ribazada site). Mature junipers with different mistletoe infestation and health class (crown cover percentage) were selected in each site. The crown cover and the infestation degree by mistletoe were visually estimated for each juniper and both were expressed as percentages. Declining junipers were defined as those presenting high infestation degree (5-100% of the crown covered by mistletoe individuals) and low crown cover (10-75%), whereas non-declining junipers presented low infestation degree (0-5% of the crown covered by mistletoe individuals) and high crown cover (80-100%) ( Table 1). Recently dead junipers were completely defoliated and preserved bark and abundant remains of dwarf The climate in the study area is continental Mediterranean, characterized by cold winters and dry, warm summers. According to local climate data from the "Alcalá de la Selva" station (40 • 22 N, 0 • 43 W, 1404 m a.s.l.; reference period 1950-2020), located ca. 32 and 30 km apart from the "Aliaga" and "Ribazada" study sites, respectively, annual precipitation is 572 mm and the mean annual temperature is 11.2 • C. The mean minimum and maximum monthly temperatures are −1.9 • C (January) and 25.5 • C (August), respectively.

Study Mistletoe and Host Species
The dwarf mistletoe (A. oxycedri) is a small (plant width varies 5-25 cm), dioecious, evergreen plant that can inhabit the same host over several generations and disperses through explosive seed discharges [19,33]. This dwarf mistletoe shows the widest distribution area of the 42 recognized species of Arceuthobium affecting juniper species over 100 • of longitude from the western Mediterranean Basin (Spain and Morocco) to central Asia [20].
The common juniper (J. communis) is the most widely distributed gymnosperm species, being found across the whole Northern Hemisphere, in Eurasia and North America [18]. It is an evergreen, slow-growing, shade-intolerant, usually dioecious conifer appearing in harsh environments (continental or cold sites) over all types of soils, particularly on rocky substrates or on soils with low nutrient concentrations [18]. Its radial growth is reduced by low precipitation and soil water availability in dry Mediterranean areas and by low growing-season temperatures in cold boreal regions [34].

Field Sampling and Measurements of Ring-Width Series
Field sampling was carried out during April 2017 (Aliaga site) and August 2020 (La Ribazada site). Mature junipers with different mistletoe infestation and health class (crown cover percentage) were selected in each site. The crown cover and the infestation degree by mistletoe were visually estimated for each juniper and both were expressed as percentages. Declining junipers were defined as those presenting high infestation degree (5-100% of the crown covered by mistletoe individuals) and low crown cover (10-75%), whereas non-declining junipers presented low infestation degree (0-5% of the crown covered by mistletoe individuals) and high crown cover (80-100%) ( Table 1). Recently dead junipers were completely defoliated and preserved bark and abundant remains of dwarf mistletoe. In Aliaga, 15 non-declining, 15 declining and 11 recently dead junipers were sampled. In Ribazada, 20 non-declining, 20 declining and 3 recently dead junipers were sampled ( Table 1). The basal diameter and height of junipers were measured using tapes. We took basal cross-sections of junipers using a hand saw. Wood samples were air dried and carefully sanded with sandpapers of progressively finer grain until annual rings were clearly visible. Then, they were scanned at a resolution of 2400 dpi using an Epson Expression 10000XL scanner (Epson, Suwa, Japan). Two radii per section were visually cross-dated and ring widths were measured to the nearest 0.001 mm from the pith to the bark using the CooRecorder and CDendro software [35]. The quality of the visual cross-dating was checked and controlled by using the software COFECHA (Univ. Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA), which calculates correlations between ring-width series of the same and different individuals and the mean site series [36].

Processing Ring-Width Series
To compare growth trends and patterns, mean series of ring width were obtained for declining and non-declining junipers in each site. To calculate climate-and drought-growth relationships for the two juniper health classes (declining and non-declining junipers), ring-width data were detrended and standardized to remove long-term growth trends related to ontogeny or disturbances [37]. This was accomplished by using the software ARSTAN v.44 [38]. Detrending was conducted by fitting 67% cubic smoothing splines with a 50% cutoff frequency. Then, the detrended series were pre-whitened with loworder autoregressive models to remove growth persistence, which is necessary to calculate climate-growth relationships [37]. Individual series of ring-width indices were combined into two series for the two health classes in each site by using a bi-weight robust mean [37]. Dead junipers were not considered because of their low sample size in Ribazada.
To characterize the raw and detrended ring-width series several statistics were calculated including, mean ring width, first-order autocorrelation (a measure of year-to-year persistence in growth), mean sensitivity (a measure of relative changes in width between consecutive rings), and mean correlation among indexed ring-width series [39]. These statistics were calculated over the best-replicated periods (1950-2016 in Aliaga and 1950-2019 in Ribazada). According to the Expressed Population Signal (EPS), a statistic that measures the replication and coherence of mean indexed ring-width series (chronologies), these time spans may be considered well-replicated, since chronologies of the two health classes and sites showed EPS values over 0.85 [40].
To analyze growth responses to climate at the individual level, first ring-width data were transformed into basal area increment (BAI) data assuming concentric growth. This was performed using the bai.out function of the dplR package [41] of the R statistical software [42].

Climate Data and Drought Index
Since long and homogeneous series of local climate data were not available, we obtained a series of monthly climate data (mean maximum and minimum temperatures, total precipitation) gridded at 1.1 km 2 resolution from the E-OBS v. 22.0e database and for the period 1950-2020 [43]. Estimated 0.5 • -gridded soil moisture data, corresponding to the upper 10 cm and produced by the ERA-Interim reanalysis were also obtained for the period 1979-2016 [44].
To assess drought severity, we used the 1.1-km 2 gridded Spanish database of the Standardized Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) [45]. The SPEI is a multiscalar drought index calculated at several temporal resolutions with low and high values corresponding to dry and wet conditions, respectively. Its calculation is based on monthly differences between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, which depends on temperature [45].

Statistical Analyses
To compare variables (juniper size and age, ring width) between declining and nondeclining junipers, Mann-Whitney tests were used [46]. These tests were also used to compare mean ring-width values between health classes for selected years or periods. Pearson (r) and Spearman (r s ) correlations were used to assess relationships among variables. Spearman correlations were used because some variables (crown cover, mistletoe infestation) did not follow a normal distribution. To assess if the SPEI linear trend or slope differed from zero, we used a bootstrapping approach based on 1999 replicates of bootstrapped SPEI slope values, i.e., SPEI slopes calculated on year-SPEI regressions based on random sampling with replacement from the original sample. This allowed calculating approximate 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals of the SPEI slope.
To quantify climate-growth relationships, Pearson correlations were calculated by relating monthly climate variables and mean series of ring-width indices of the two health classes and considering the best-replicated periods (1950-2016 in Aliaga and 1950-2019 in Ribazada). Dead junipers were not included in this analysis because of their low sample size in Ribazada (Table 1). Correlations were calculated from the previous October to the current September and the 0.05 and 0.01 significance thresholds were plotted. Analogously, to calculate drought-growth relationships, Pearson correlations were calculated by relating monthly SPEI values for 1-to 20-month long periods and the four series of ring-width indices.
Since summer precipitation is a major driver of juniper growth in the study area [34], we also calculated moving correlations between the mean series of ring-width indices of the two health classes and summer precipitation considering 20-year intervals. The mean ring-width series of dead junipers were not considered in these analyses because they were not well replicated enough throughout the common period 1950-2016 in both study sites.
To evaluate how junipers' growth responded to current-year summer precipitation and mistletoe infestation at the individual level, we fitted linear mixed-effects models [47] to log-transformed BAI data using the nlme package in the R software [48]. In these models of growth, individuals were included as a random factor, whilst mistletoe infestation, summer precipitation and their interaction were considered fixed factors. The effect of crown cover was not tested since this variable was inversely related to mistletoe infestation (see Section 3.2). Models were fitted in both sites through maximum-likelihood estimation by reducing the Akaike Information Criterion and considering a first-order (AR1) autocorrelation structure of BAI data [49].

Temperature, Precipitation and Drought: Trends and Variability
Temperature has significantly risen (r = 0.66, p = 0.0001) in the study area since 1950 at a mean rate of +0.03 • C year −1 (Figure 2). However, precipitation showed a minor negative trend since 1950 onwards (−0.25 mm year −1 ), which was not significant (p = 0.695).  Annual climate (mean temperature and total precipitation) and drought trends and variability observed in the study area. The presented SPEI corresponds to July and it was calculated considering a 12-month temporal resolution. The continuous lines correspond to linear regressions fitted to temperature and SPEI data. Annual climate (mean temperature and total precipitation) and drought trends and variability observed in the study area. The presented SPEI corresponds to July and it was calculated considering a 12-month temporal resolution. The continuous lines correspond to linear regressions fitted to temperature and SPEI data.
In Aliaga and Ribazada the oldest individuals were 126 and 134 years old, respectively. In terms of juniper size or age, only considering the two health classes, we did not find significant differences between groups (Table 1). Neither growth rates (ring widths) nor dendrochronological statistics (first-order autocorrelation, mean sensitivity) differed among juniper health classes either in Aliaga or in Ribazada. In the case of the mean correlation of individual ring-width, it was higher in non-declining junipers from the Aliaga site, but lower in non-declining junipers from the Ribazada site (Table 1). The ring-width mean series of declining and non-declining junipers were well replicated since 1950 onwards, as already mentioned before.

Growth Patterns and Climate-Growth Relationships
In Aliaga, non-declining junipers significantly (p < 0.05) grew less than declining and dead junipers during the wet 1950s and early 1960s. Then, there was a higher growth rate in declining than in non-declining or dead individuals during the wet 1987-1992 period. From 2010 onwards dead trees grew less than the others, and all junipers showed negative growth trends (Figure 3a). In Ribazada, dead junipers showed the highest growth rates in the past, and declining and dead junipers grew more than non-declining junipers in the early 1970s. Conversely, non-declining junipers grew more in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Finally, non-declining individuals showed a higher growth than declining and recently dead junipers from 2017 to 2019 (Figure 3b).    Cool and wet conditions from May to July, i.e., during the growing season, promoted juniper radial growth (Figure 4). Growth of declining junipers from the Aliaga site was more responsive to warm June-July conditions than in the case of non-declining junipers. Higher precipitation in the prior December and in the current May also enhanced growth more in declining than in non-declining junipers. Conversely, non-declining junipers responded more to higher soil moisture levels in the prior winter (December to February) and the growing season (May, July) than declining junipers.  In the Ribazada site, growth of non-declining junipers responded more to June precipitation and to June-July soil moisture than in the case of declining junipers. Declining junipers responded more positively to April minimum temperatures than non-declining conspecifics. Both in Aliaga and Ribazada, prior warm December-January conditions were associated with low growth rates of declining junipers.
Overall, the highest correlations between juniper growth rate and the SPEI drought index were found from June to September and for 10-to 15-month resolution ( Figure 5). We found higher correlations between the SPEI and juniper growth rates in declining than in non-declining junipers in both sites, but the difference was more notable in the Aliaga site. The highest correlation between SPEI and the junipers growth rate (r = 0.65) was found for August considering a 14-month window in the case of declining junipers from the Aliaga site. Climate-growth relationships based on Pearson correlations calculated between series of ring-width indices of declining (D) and non-declining (ND) junipers vs. monthly climate variables (Tx, mean maximum temperature; Tn, mean minimum temperature; Pr, precipitation; Sm, soil moisture). Correlations were calculated from previous October to current September with months abbreviated by lowercase and uppercase letters corresponding to the prior and growth years, respectively. Dashed and dotted horizontal lines show the 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels, respectively. Moving correlations showed a higher dependence of juniper growth on summer (June to August) precipitation in non-declining than in declining individuals ( Figure 6). In Ribazada, the correlations between summer precipitation and ring-width indices steadily increased since 1950 (p < 0.001). Correlations peaked from the 1980s to the 1990s in both sites. Moving correlations showed a higher dependence of juniper growth on summer (June to August) precipitation in non-declining than in declining individuals ( Figure 6). In Ribazada, the correlations between summer precipitation and ring-width indices steadily increased since 1950 (p < 0.001). Correlations peaked from the 1980s to the 1990s in both sites.  In Aliaga, linear mixed-effect models showed higher summer precipitation was positively associated to higher juniper growth, whereas in Ribazada the interaction with mistletoe infestation was significant and negatively related to growth (Table 2, Figure 7). The association between higher mistletoe infestation and higher juniper growth in Ribazada could be explained by the higher growth rate of declining junipers in this site ( Table 1).
The year x infestation interaction also showed a significant negative effect in the Ribazada In Aliaga, linear mixed-effect models showed higher summer precipitation was positively associated to higher juniper growth, whereas in Ribazada the interaction with mistletoe infestation was significant and negatively related to growth (Table 2, Figure 7). The association between higher mistletoe infestation and higher juniper growth in Ribazada could be explained by the higher growth rate of declining junipers in this site ( Table 1).
The year x infestation interaction also showed a significant negative effect in the Ribazada site meaning that mistletoe infestation reduced juniper growth recently. The infestation x summer precipitation interaction found in Ribazada could be interpreted as a juniper growth reduction as mistletoe infestation and summer precipitation increase (Figure 7). High summer precipitation had a positive effect on growth when mistletoe cover was low, and the negative influence of mistletoe cover on growth dominated any amount of summer precipitation once it exceeded 50%. This interaction was not observed in the drier Aliaga site, where mistletoe infestation alone had no significant effect on growth, and only summer precipitation affected growth.

Discussion
As expected, the strongest interactive impact on juniper growth of summer precipitation and mistletoe infestation was observed in the wetter, north-oriented Ribazada site, where juniper growth rates were higher than in the drier, south-oriented Aliaga site. Fastgrowing junipers in wetter sites could be more prone to the impact of aridification and dwarf mistletoe infestation. Declining junipers from the drier Aliaga site showed the strongest impact of low summer precipitation on juniper growth and were very responsive to prior-winter and growing-season precipitation and soil moisture. The juniper response to the interaction between summer precipitation and dwarf mistletoe infestation observed in Ribazada suggests that elevated summer precipitation enhanced juniper growth if mistletoe cover was low enough, and the negative influence of mistletoe on ra- Figure 7. Interactive effects of mistletoe infestation or cover and summer precipitation (logtransformed values) on radial growth (color scale, log-transformed basal area increment) of junipers as predicted by the linear mixed-effects models fitted to data from the Ribazada site.

Discussion
As expected, the strongest interactive impact on juniper growth of summer precipitation and mistletoe infestation was observed in the wetter, north-oriented Ribazada site, where juniper growth rates were higher than in the drier, south-oriented Aliaga site. Fast-growing junipers in wetter sites could be more prone to the impact of aridification and dwarf mistletoe infestation. Declining junipers from the drier Aliaga site showed the strongest impact of low summer precipitation on juniper growth and were very re-sponsive to prior-winter and growing-season precipitation and soil moisture. The juniper response to the interaction between summer precipitation and dwarf mistletoe infestation observed in Ribazada suggests that elevated summer precipitation enhanced juniper growth if mistletoe cover was low enough, and the negative influence of mistletoe on radial growth was observed when the infestation degree was very high (above 50% of crown covered by mistletoe). Either declining (in Aliaga) or recently dead (in Ribazada) junipers showing recent infestation by dwarf mistletoe grew more in the past. These findings may be also linked to the higher mistletoe infestation observed in Ribazada and to the higher growth rates of declining vs. non-declining junipers observed in both study sites. The negative effect of low summer precipitation on growth overrides the effects due to mistletoe infestation. The impact of warmer and drier conditions on juniper growth is relevant in the study area where warming and aridification trends since the 1980s could impair shrublands productivity.
Interestingly, junipers showed similar ages in both sites but were larger in the wetter Ribazada site than in the drier Aliaga site. Therefore, fast-growing junipers from wet microsites could reach larger sizes (thicker diameter, taller and wider crowns) than slow-growing junipers from dry microsites, making the former more prone to mistletoe infestation (larger shrubs are able to contain larger populations of dwarf mistletoe). A similar positive interaction between the host size (tree height) and pine mistletoe (V. album) infestation was also observed in Scots pine [14]. Furthermore, it could be speculated that older junipers have also been more exposed to more continuous dwarf mistletoe infestations than younger junipers, but juniper age and mistletoe infestation were only positively related in Aliaga, and we found no differences in age between the two vitality groups. Hence, the positive association between higher mistletoe infestation and juniper size seems not to be mediated by the host age. However, the mistletoe−pine and the dwarf mistletoe−juniper cases are quite different because V. album is mainly dispersed by frugivorous birds and also by direct seed fall, and taller trees could act as better perching sites than shorter trees, whereas A. oxycedri is dispersed through explosive seed discharges [20,33]. In the case of dwarf mistletoe, a larger crown could have a higher probability of being colonized than a smaller crown because A. oxycedrus establishment and growth are favored by well-illuminated crowns, and lead to clustered spatial patterns of infested hosts [19].
The impacts of dwarf mistletoe on the growth of junipers were severe but they were especially observed in recent years, with dead (Aliaga) or declining and dead (Ribazada) junipers showing lower growth rates than non-declining junipers in the last 7 and 3 years, respectively. This recent divergence in growth between juniper health classes usually started after years with reduced growth, corresponding to droughts such as 2009 in Aliaga and 2016 in Ribazada. This post-drought divergence between host health classes and the observed negative association between crown cover and mistletoe infestation highlight again that both stressors act synergistically to reduce wood formation and health in junipers. The mechanisms of these negative impacts on radial growth can be related to the vulnerability of junipers to very warm summer conditions leading to high vapor pressure deficit and low soil moisture in the uppermost soil [6][7][8][9][10][11], the capacity of mistletoe to amplify such evaporative demand reducing the hosts' water-use efficiency [15,16,28], and the withdrawal of carbohydrates and nutrients from the hydraulic system of infested hosts [32]. Mistletoe infestation can reduce carbon uptake of hosts, which may try to keep stable leaf to sapwood ratios [15] and shift carbon allocation through leaf shedding and branch dieback [29] or by reducing the resources used to build chemical and anatomical defenses [30].
Our analyses exhibit several shortcomings. First, the use of gridded climate data does not allow for a proper evaluation of growth responses to water availability and precipitation. However, long and robust precipitation records are scarce in the case of Mediterranean mountain areas, so using gridded datasets is often the best choice. Second, using a drought index such as the SPEI is based on the estimation of evapotranspiration based on temperature data and other variables. Therefore, considering summer rainfall in models of growth may be a simple but efficient way to deal with such uncertainty related to the SPEI calculation. Third, we used fixed categories of junipers based on their health status (declining, non-declining and dead individuals). However, non-declining individuals can become declining individuals through time, and it is not feasible reconstructing mistletoe infestation dynamics. We can reconstruct growth, but the exact year when infestation started in declining or dead individuals is unknown.
The responsiveness of juniper growth to long droughts and its sensitivity to soil moisture [34] make Mediterranean populations of common juniper prone to show widespread dieback and mortality events in response to warmer temperatures and drier conditions. Infestation by dwarf mistletoe in a wide spectrum of juniper species may exacerbate the negative impacts of drought, particularly in sites where hosts are large and grow more. The interactions between both stressors could trigger local de-shrubification processes or at least of the most abundant juniper species [10], slowing down or reverting successional dynamics in some places by stopping shrub encroachment into abandoned fields or grasslands. If drought and mistletoe infestation interact and slow down these succession dynamics, this would disrupt or even revert the conversion of those formerly managed and exploited landscapes into shrublands and forests. The dieback and death of shrubby junipers would benefit other drought-tolerant woody species such as small shrubs and sub-shrubs (e.g., A. ovalis, G. scorpius) and also widespread grasses (e.g., Brachypodium spp.). We argue that a better understanding of the interactions between increasing drought stress, dwarf mistletoe infestations and hosts' performance (junipers) is needed to forecast how this hemiparasite could alter Mediterranean shrublands dynamics. This research should be undertaken under current and projected global-change scenarios characterized by warmer conditions and shifting land uses (abandonment of formerly cultivated or grazed lands, shrubland and forest encroachment into abandoned fields, expansion of wild ungulates, etc.). This will enable better management of affected shrub communities in the future.

Conclusions
The growth of common juniper in continental-Mediterranean sites was constrained by elevated temperatures and low precipitation leading to drought during the growing season. Infestation by dwarf mistletoe contributed to growth decline and canopy dieback, but the growth reduction was observed in the short term. The interaction between drought and dwarf mistletoe infestation constrained growth, particularly in the north-oriented wetter site, where hosts were larger and presented higher growth rates. Overall, our results indicate that the negative effect of drought on growth overrides the effects due to dwarf mistletoe infestation.