Single-Sided Microwave Near-Field Scanning of Pine Wood Lumber for Defect Detection

: Defects and cracks in dried natural timber (relative permittivity 2–5) may cause structural weakness and enhanced warping in structural beams. For a pine wood beam (1200 mm × 70 mm × 70 mm), microwave reflection (S 11 ) and transmission (S 21 ) measurements using a cavity-backed slot antenna on the wood surface showed the variations caused by imperfections and defects in the wood. Reflection measurements at 4.4 GHz increased (>5 dB) above a major knot evident on the wood surface when the E-field was parallel to the wood grain. Similar results were observed for air cavities, independent of depth from the wood surface. The presence of a metal bolt in an air hole increased S 11 by 2 dB. In comparison, transmission measurements (S 21 ) were increased by 6 dB for a metal screw centered in the cavity. A kiln-dried pine wood sample was saturated with water to increase its moisture content from 17% to 138%. Both parallel and perpendicular E-field measurements showed a difference of more than 15 dB above an open saw-cut slot in the water-saturated beam. The insertion of a brass plate in the open slot created a 7 dB rise in the S 11 measurement ( p < 0.0003), while there was no significant variation for perpendicular orientation. By measuring the reflection coefficient, it was possible to detect the location of a crack through a change in its magnitude without a noticeable change (<0.01 GHz) in resonant frequency. These microwave measurements offer a simple, single-frequency non-destructive testing method of structural timber in situ, when one or more plane faces are accessible for direct antenna contact.


Introduction
Sustainability is an important aspect of structural engineering. As wood is a naturally occurring material, timber beams in multistory buildings have become increasingly desirable as a renewable material of choice [1][2][3][4]. With greater flexibility than steel and concrete, and a higher strength-to-mass ratio, timber constructions offer many advantages in both transport and construction costs, as well as durability [5,6], even though timber does suffer from points of weakness related to knots, grain anisotropy, and flammability.
Methods for measuring the strength characteristics of wood in situ (i.e., after the construction of a building) are limited. There are difficult and unresolvable issues related to non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques such as acoustics and ultrasonics. Acoustic wave velocity (AWV) was used as an early selection method for structural boards of Eucalyptus timber [7]. Near-infrared spectroscopy was utilized to detect the presence of three different oils in Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtuse wood samples that were used in Japanese construction [8]. The possibility of using near-field microwave measurements with a single antenna is one option that has yet to be explored in significant detail. Thus, the research question addressed in this paper is: Can near-field microwave measurements provide information about the uniformity of natural timber beams in situ?
Material evaluation has been achieved through a number of physical methods. Nondestructive testing involves the identification and characterization of the damage on the surface and within the interior of the material, without weakening the structure or removing where ε = ε and ε" = σ/ω.
Here, σ and ε are the conductivity and electric permittivity of the wood, respectively. The angular frequency of the radiation is ω, ε r is the relative permittivity, and ε 0 is the permittivity of free space: If a plane EM wave is travelling at the boundary of two materials (i.e., air and wood) with different permittivity, permeability, and impedance, part of the energy will be reflected at that boundary. Because both materials have no magnetic properties, the reflection of the plane EM wave is due to the impedance discontinuity. The reflection and transmission coefficients (S 11 ) and (S 21 ) can then be defined as: S 21 = E tr E in (4) where E in , E re , E tr are the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric fields, respectively, and ε r1 and ε r2 are the relative permittivity of the air and wood, respectively. From antenna theory, the reflection coefficient or return loss of an antenna quantifies how much power is reflected back along the feed transmission line from the antenna terminals. The measurement of S 11 can therefore indicate a change in the electromagnetic characteristics of the material close to the antenna. In this study, the return loss from a cavity-backed resonant slot antenna lightly pressed onto the wood surface was used [16,17]. The advantage of this antenna is that it can be pressed against the material under test without impacting the measurement. If the impedance in the material changes in the immediate vicinity of the aperture, these changes can be identified in the reactive near-field of the antenna. S 11 was measured by moving the antenna along the wood surface and across the region with the cut. The moisture content of the wood was measured using the drying oven method according to Equation (5) in [18]: Moisture content (%) = Initial mass − Dry mass Dry mass × 100 First, a wood saw was used to cut 20 small (5 × 5 × 5 mm 3 ) wood samples. The samples were weighed to determine the initial mass and placed in a well-ventilated oven with the temperature controlled to 101 • for 3 h. The dried wood samples were weighed again for the mass calculations. The average moisture content of the dried, dressed wood was 17%. Subsequently, the moisture content of wood was increased by submerging wood samples in water for 24 h and the oven-drying procedure was repeated to calculate the moisture content of wet wood samples. The moisture content percentage increased to 138%.

Antenna Characteristics
The antenna used for the reflection measurements was a cavity-backed slot antenna machined from aluminum (overall dimensions: 59 mm × 35 mm × 12 mm) with a resonant slot (30 mm × 13 mm) [19], as shown in Figure 1. The antenna feed was a triangular plate electromagnetically coupled with the slot. The total weight of the antenna was 35.3 g. The antenna feed was connected via a low-loss 50 Ω coaxial cable to a vector network analyzer (Fieldfox N9923A) for the S 11 measurements. The radiation from the antenna slot was linearly polarized with the electric field (E-field) perpendicular to the slot length and so parallel to the longest dimension of the antenna [20]. electromagnetically coupled with the slot. The total weight of the antenna was 35.3 g. The antenna feed was connected via a low-loss 50 Ω coaxial cable to a vector network analyzer (Fieldfox N9923A) for the S11 measurements. The radiation from the antenna slot was linearly polarized with the electric field (E-field) perpendicular to the slot length and so parallel to the longest dimension of the antenna [20].

Wood Measurements
Wood is a natural material with a pronounced grain resulting from yearly growth (annual rings) and so it is both mechanically and electromagnetically anisotropic. Measurements were taken both parallel and perpendicular to the wood grain.
The reflection (S11) measurements were undertaken on pine wood. Wood samples sourced from a local timber merchant were commercially prepared (kiln-dried with a moisture content of 17%) and dressed (i.e., all four sides were smooth). The end face of the pine wood sample showed a section of the annual rings ( Figure 2). These wood samples are commonly used in cabinet making and furniture. The measured size and density of the wood samples are given in Table 1

Wood Measurements
Wood is a natural material with a pronounced grain resulting from yearly growth (annual rings) and so it is both mechanically and electromagnetically anisotropic. Measurements were taken both parallel and perpendicular to the wood grain.
The reflection (S 11 ) measurements were undertaken on pine wood. Wood samples sourced from a local timber merchant were commercially prepared (kiln-dried with a moisture content of 17%) and dressed (i.e., all four sides were smooth). The end face of the pine wood sample showed a section of the annual rings ( Figure 2). These wood samples are commonly used in cabinet making and furniture. The measured size and density of the wood samples are given in Table 1  electromagnetically coupled with the slot. The total weight of the antenna was 35.3 g. The antenna feed was connected via a low-loss 50 Ω coaxial cable to a vector network analyzer (Fieldfox N9923A) for the S11 measurements. The radiation from the antenna slot was linearly polarized with the electric field (E-field) perpendicular to the slot length and so parallel to the longest dimension of the antenna [20].

Wood Measurements
Wood is a natural material with a pronounced grain resulting from yearly growth (annual rings) and so it is both mechanically and electromagnetically anisotropic. Measurements were taken both parallel and perpendicular to the wood grain.
The reflection (S11) measurements were undertaken on pine wood. Wood samples sourced from a local timber merchant were commercially prepared (kiln-dried with a moisture content of 17%) and dressed (i.e., all four sides were smooth). The end face of the pine wood sample showed a section of the annual rings ( Figure 2). These wood samples are commonly used in cabinet making and furniture. The measured size and density of the wood samples are given in Table 1    S 11 was measured for the E-field directions perpendicular and parallel to the wood grain as shown in Figure 3a,b. When the E-field (+X direction) was parallel to the wood grain (+X direction), the antenna measured parallel polarization. When the E-field (+Y direction) was perpendicular to wood grain (+X direction), the antenna measured perpendicular polarization. At 18 places on the wood with no surface signs of imperfections, parallel and perpendicular polarizations were measured.  S11 was measured for the E-field directions perpendicular and parallel to the wood grain as shown in Figure 3a,b. When the E-field (+X direction) was parallel to the wood grain (+X direction), the antenna measured parallel polarization. When the E-field (+Y direction) was perpendicular to wood grain (+X direction), the antenna measured perpendicular polarization. At 18 places on the wood with no surface signs of imperfections, parallel and perpendicular polarizations were measured. For the transmission measurements, S21 was measured for the E-field directions parallel and perpendicular to the wood annual rings, as shown in Figure 3c,d, respectively. For example, the two antennas were placed on each side of face 1, so the E-field direction (+Z direction) was parallel to the wood grain direction (+Z direction) (Figure 3c). Furthermore, when the two antennas were placed on each side of face 2, the E-field direction (+Y direction) was perpendicular to the wood grain direction (+Z direction).

Antenna Measurements in Air and Wood
The S11 of the antenna was measured with the slot in contact with a dry pinewood wood beam. The objective was to assess the variability of the measurements on the S11 minimum measurements at the resonant frequency of wood (4.4 GHz, see Figure 4). For the transmission measurements, S 21 was measured for the E-field directions parallel and perpendicular to the wood annual rings, as shown in Figure 3c,d, respectively. For example, the two antennas were placed on each side of face 1, so the E-field direction (+Z direction) was parallel to the wood grain direction (+Z direction) (Figure 3c). Furthermore, when the two antennas were placed on each side of face 2, the E-field direction (+Y direction) was perpendicular to the wood grain direction (+Z direction).

Antenna Measurements in Air and Wood
The S 11 of the antenna was measured with the slot in contact with a dry pinewood wood beam. The objective was to assess the variability of the measurements on the S 11 minimum measurements at the resonant frequency of wood (4.4 GHz, see Figure 4).  . Reflection coefficient (S11) as a function of frequency when the slot was pressed again pine wood (red line). The black line is the S11 for the same antenna measured in air. There is a minimum at the resonant frequency of 4.4 GHz.
Measurements were taken at 18 places with no surface signs of imperfections a the 120 cm wood beam. Figure 5 shows that the parallel reflection measurement a wood sample was approximately −17 dB, whereas it was approximately −19 dB for pendicular measurements. Minor variations are shown for S11, with mean and stan deviations of −17.0 (0.4) dB for parallel and −18.5 (0.2) dB for perpendicular polariza  Measurements were taken at 18 places with no surface signs of imperfections along the 120 cm wood beam. Figure 5 shows that the parallel reflection measurement along wood sample was approximately −17 dB, whereas it was approximately −19 dB for perpendicular measurements. Minor variations are shown for S 11    Measurements were taken at 18 places with no surface signs of imperfections a the 120 cm wood beam. Figure 5 shows that the parallel reflection measurement a wood sample was approximately −17 dB, whereas it was approximately −19 dB for pendicular measurements. Minor variations are shown for S11, with mean and stand deviations of −17.0 (0.4) dB for parallel and −18.5 (0.2) dB for perpendicular polarizat The box-and-whisker plots ( Figure 6) for both polarizations showed significant sotropy at approximately 2.45 GHz. The S21 measurements showed no significant an ropy at 2.45 GHz for the y and z directions. When the E-field had both perpendicular  The box-and-whisker plots ( Figure 6) for both polarizations showed significant anisotropy at approximately 2.45 GHz. The S 21 measurements showed no significant anisotropy at 2.45 GHz for the y and z directions. When the E-field had both perpendicular and parallel polarizations to the wood grain, there was a clear difference (greater than 20 dB) in the received signal for the two polarizations for both faces (Face 1 and Face 2). The explanation for this noticeable difference was the effect of the wood grain annual rings relative to the E field.
x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 5 explanation for this noticeable difference was the effect of the wood grain annual rings relative to the E field.

Branch Measurements
Near-field measurements across a wood surface anomaly were performed over a branch mark on a pine wood surface (Figure 7). The antenna was placed on the surface, moved in steps of 2.5 mm across the branch mark, and the S11 values were recorded. Both perpendicular and parallel polarizations were used in the measurement process. For parallel measurement, the S11 values decreased significantly (p < 0.0003) from an average of -20 ± 2 dB to reach −27 dB at the branch mark position (distance = 0 mm, see Figure 8), while for perpendicular polarization, there was no obvious change in S11 across the anomaly.

Branch Measurements
Near-field measurements across a wood surface anomaly were performed over a branch mark on a pine wood surface (Figure 7). The antenna was placed on the surface, moved in steps of 2.5 mm across the branch mark, and the S 11 values were recorded. Both perpendicular and parallel polarizations were used in the measurement process. For parallel measurement, the S 11 values decreased significantly (p < 0.0003) from an average of -20 ± 2 dB to reach −27 dB at the branch mark position (distance = 0 mm, see Figure 8), while for perpendicular polarization, there was no obvious change in S 11 across the anomaly. , x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 5 explanation for this noticeable difference was the effect of the wood grain annual rings relative to the E field.

Branch Measurements
Near-field measurements across a wood surface anomaly were performed over a branch mark on a pine wood surface (Figure 7). The antenna was placed on the surface, moved in steps of 2.5 mm across the branch mark, and the S11 values were recorded. Both perpendicular and parallel polarizations were used in the measurement process. For parallel measurement, the S11 values decreased significantly (p < 0.0003) from an average of -20 ± 2 dB to reach −27 dB at the branch mark position (distance = 0 mm, see Figure 8), while for perpendicular polarization, there was no obvious change in S11 across the anomaly.

Cavity Measurements
As parallel measurements showed a more significant effect in the vicinity of the branch anomaly, parallel S11 measurements were used in further experiments. Two separated holes (diameter 12.5 mm) were created in the sample. The first hole was 10 mm away from the measurement surface (top of the image) as shown in Figure 9a, and another hole was 30 mm away from the surface (Figure 9b). A steel bolt with the same dimensions as the hole was inserted to observe the effect of a conducting insert inside wooden walls, such as wires and metal screws. In addition, transmission measurements were conducted to observe the effect of the metal inserts in the wood cavities. (a) Wood Beam, Hole 30 mm from the Measurement Surface Figure 10a shows that S11 was reduced to −17 dB when the hole was filled with air. When the bolt was inserted, the reflection coefficient reached more than −20 dB. For transmission measurements (Figure 10b), there was no change in S21 for an air-filled hole; however, the steel bolt resulted in a significant change to −38 dB immediately above the anomaly at 3.5 cm.

Cavity Measurements
As parallel measurements showed a more significant effect in the vicinity of the branch anomaly, parallel S 11 measurements were used in further experiments. Two separated holes (diameter 12.5 mm) were created in the sample. The first hole was 10 mm away from the measurement surface (top of the image) as shown in Figure 9a, and another hole was 30 mm away from the surface (Figure 9b). A steel bolt with the same dimensions as the hole was inserted to observe the effect of a conducting insert inside wooden walls, such as wires and metal screws. In addition, transmission measurements were conducted to observe the effect of the metal inserts in the wood cavities.

Cavity Measurements
As parallel measurements showed a more significant effect in the vicinity of the branch anomaly, parallel S11 measurements were used in further experiments. Two separated holes (diameter 12.5 mm) were created in the sample. The first hole was 10 mm away from the measurement surface (top of the image) as shown in Figure 9a, and another hole was 30 mm away from the surface (Figure 9b). A steel bolt with the same dimensions as the hole was inserted to observe the effect of a conducting insert inside wooden walls, such as wires and metal screws. In addition, transmission measurements were conducted to observe the effect of the metal inserts in the wood cavities. (a) Wood Beam, Hole 30 mm from the Measurement Surface Figure 10a shows that S11 was reduced to −17 dB when the hole was filled with air. When the bolt was inserted, the reflection coefficient reached more than −20 dB. For transmission measurements (Figure 10b), there was no change in S21 for an air-filled hole; however, the steel bolt resulted in a significant change to −38 dB immediately above the anomaly at 3.5 cm.  Figure 10a shows that S 11 was reduced to −17 dB when the hole was filled with air. When the bolt was inserted, the reflection coefficient reached more than −20 dB. For transmission measurements (Figure 10b), there was no change in S 21 for an air-filled hole; however, the steel bolt resulted in a significant change to −38 dB immediately above the anomaly at 3.5 cm. (b) Wood Beam, Hole 10 mm from the Measurement Surface Figure 11a shows that S11 = 17.65 dB increased above the air-filled hole; however, the bolt insert resulted in S11 = −17.5 dB, an immense decrease. Air is a very low loss dielectric material, and the hole was in the very near-field E-field region of the antenna. When the hole was filled with a good conductor, S11 decreased dramatically. These results were verified by transmission measurements (see Figure 11b), as the S21 showed no noticeable change for the air-filled hole, but was sharply reduced to below −48 dB for the conductorfilled hole.
(a) (b) Figure 11. The hole was 10 mm from the measurement surface and at 4 cm: (a) S11 for air-filled hole vs. bolt; (b) S21 for airfilled hole vs. bolt. (b) Wood Beam, Hole 10 mm from the Measurement Surface Figure 11a shows that S 11 = 17.65 dB increased above the air-filled hole; however, the bolt insert resulted in S 11 = −17.5 dB, an immense decrease. Air is a very low loss dielectric material, and the hole was in the very near-field E-field region of the antenna. When the hole was filled with a good conductor, S 11 decreased dramatically. These results were verified by transmission measurements (see Figure 11b), as the S 21 showed no noticeable change for the air-filled hole, but was sharply reduced to below −48 dB for the conductorfilled hole. (b) Wood Beam, Hole 10 mm from the Measurement Surface Figure 11a shows that S11 = 17.65 dB increased above the air-filled hole; however, the bolt insert resulted in S11 = −17.5 dB, an immense decrease. Air is a very low loss dielectric material, and the hole was in the very near-field E-field region of the antenna. When the hole was filled with a good conductor, S11 decreased dramatically. These results were verified by transmission measurements (see Figure 11b), as the S21 showed no noticeable change for the air-filled hole, but was sharply reduced to below −48 dB for the conductorfilled hole.

Moisture Content (MC)
(a) (b) Figure 11. The hole was 10 mm from the measurement surface and at 4 cm: (a) S11 for air-filled hole vs. bolt; (b) S21 for airfilled hole vs. bolt.

Moisture Content (MC)
The effect of moisture on the measurements was investigated by comparing dry wood with wet wood across a saw cut. The pine wood sample was partially cut in the center of its 120 cm length (location number 10 cm). The cut was 2 mm wide and 50 mm deep. S 11 measurements were made at 4.4 GHz across the cut in two orientations. The first orientation considered the E-field plane direction parallel to the wood grain along the x axis, and perpendicular to the cut (+Y direction) on reverse side (Figure 12a). In the second orientation, the E-field plane was perpendicular to the wood grain along the y direction and parallel to the cut (Figure 12b). The effect of moisture on the measurements was investigated by comparing dry wood with wet wood across a saw cut. The pine wood sample was partially cut in the center of its 120 cm length (location number 10 cm). The cut was 2 mm wide and 50 mm deep. S11 measurements were made at 4.4 GHz across the cut in two orientations. The first orientation considered the E-field plane direction parallel to the wood grain along the x axis, and perpendicular to the cut (+Y direction) on reverse side (Figure 12a). In the second orientation, the E-field plane was perpendicular to the wood grain along the y direction and parallel to the cut (Figure 12b). The microwave measurements showed that immediately above the cut in the wet wood samples (position 0), a reduction of (−10 dB) for the reverse side measurements in the perpendicular orientation to the cut was observed (see Figure 13a). However, reflection measurements peaked at around -30 dB for high-moisture content wood (138%), and the cut had no effect on those measurements, as shown in Figure 13b. In this case, the Efield was aligned parallel to the air-filled cut and there were no variations in reflection coefficient measurements around it.
During these experiments, no change (<2 dB) in the S11 measurements was observed when objects were located immediately below the measurement position. This indicated that the sensitivity of the measurement was confined to approximately the top 10 mm of the wood sample.
(a) (b) Figure 13. S11 measurements for wet and dry wood samples above the saw cut: (a) E-field parallel to the wood grain and perpendicular to the cut (reverse side); (b) E-field perpendicular to the wood grain and parallel to the cut (reverse side). The microwave measurements showed that immediately above the cut in the wet wood samples (position 0), a reduction of (−10 dB) for the reverse side measurements in the perpendicular orientation to the cut was observed (see Figure 13a). However, reflection measurements peaked at around -30 dB for high-moisture content wood (138%), and the cut had no effect on those measurements, as shown in Figure 13b. In this case, the E-field was aligned parallel to the air-filled cut and there were no variations in reflection coefficient measurements around it.
The effect of moisture on the measurements was investigated by comparing dry wood with wet wood across a saw cut. The pine wood sample was partially cut in the center of its 120 cm length (location number 10 cm). The cut was 2 mm wide and 50 mm deep. S11 measurements were made at 4.4 GHz across the cut in two orientations. The first orientation considered the E-field plane direction parallel to the wood grain along the x axis, and perpendicular to the cut (+Y direction) on reverse side (Figure 12a). In the second orientation, the E-field plane was perpendicular to the wood grain along the y direction and parallel to the cut (Figure 12b). The microwave measurements showed that immediately above the cut in the wet wood samples (position 0), a reduction of (−10 dB) for the reverse side measurements in the perpendicular orientation to the cut was observed (see Figure 13a). However, reflection measurements peaked at around -30 dB for high-moisture content wood (138%), and the cut had no effect on those measurements, as shown in Figure 13b. In this case, the Efield was aligned parallel to the air-filled cut and there were no variations in reflection coefficient measurements around it.
During these experiments, no change (<2 dB) in the S11 measurements was observed when objects were located immediately below the measurement position. This indicated that the sensitivity of the measurement was confined to approximately the top 10 mm of the wood sample.
(a) (b) Figure 13. S11 measurements for wet and dry wood samples above the saw cut: (a) E-field parallel to the wood grain and perpendicular to the cut (reverse side); (b) E-field perpendicular to the wood grain and parallel to the cut (reverse side). During these experiments, no change (<2 dB) in the S 11 measurements was observed when objects were located immediately below the measurement position. This indicated that the sensitivity of the measurement was confined to approximately the top 10 mm of the wood sample.
To explore the difference between an air-filled cut and a cut containing a conducting plate, a brass metal plate was placed inside the cut (Figure 14). The measurements were repeated using the same methodology for the E-field parallel and perpendicular measurements.
Forests 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 5 To explore the difference between an air-filled cut and a cut containing a conducting plate, a brass metal plate was placed inside the cut (Figure 14). The measurements were repeated using the same methodology for the E-field parallel and perpendicular measurements. Figure 14. Metal insert cut for S11 measurements.
By repeating the experiment shown in Figure 12a and b, the metal insert produced a change of 7 dB in the S11 with respect to air when the E-field was perpendicular to the cut at the cut position (position 0) (see Figure 15a). The brass reflected the electromagnetic field to the antenna. In contrast, for parallel measurements (Figure 15b), the variation in the reflection coefficient S11 was less pronounced. At the saw cut position (0 cm), S11 was not significantly changed when the cut was filled with air or metal. However, there was a significant change at around −36 dB on the left-hand side of the cut (at points −4, −3) and on the right-hand side of the cut (at point 4). This was due to the wood grain acting as a guide for the reflected field, which was reflected from the brass in both directions.
(a) (b) Figure 15. S11 measurements for air vs. metal inside the saw cut located at position 0 in water-saturated wood: (a) E-field direction was parallel to the wood grain and perpendicular to the cut (reverse side); (b) E-field direction was perpendicular to the wood grain and parallel to the cut (reverse side).

Discussion
Using a small cavity-backed slot antenna (Figure 1), S11 and S21 measurements were performed on a kiln-dried pine wood specimen (Figure 2) with the electric field oriented By repeating the experiment shown in Figure 12a,b, the metal insert produced a change of 7 dB in the S 11 with respect to air when the E-field was perpendicular to the cut at the cut position (position 0) (see Figure 15a). The brass reflected the electromagnetic field to the antenna. In contrast, for parallel measurements (Figure 15b), the variation in the reflection coefficient S 11 was less pronounced. At the saw cut position (0 cm), S 11 was not significantly changed when the cut was filled with air or metal. However, there was a significant change at around −36 dB on the left-hand side of the cut (at points −4, −3) and on the right-hand side of the cut (at point 4). This was due to the wood grain acting as a guide for the reflected field, which was reflected from the brass in both directions. To explore the difference between an air-filled cut and a cut containing a conducting plate, a brass metal plate was placed inside the cut (Figure 14). The measurements were repeated using the same methodology for the E-field parallel and perpendicular measurements. Figure 14. Metal insert cut for S11 measurements.
By repeating the experiment shown in Figure 12a and b, the metal insert produced a change of 7 dB in the S11 with respect to air when the E-field was perpendicular to the cut at the cut position (position 0) (see Figure 15a). The brass reflected the electromagnetic field to the antenna. In contrast, for parallel measurements (Figure 15b), the variation in the reflection coefficient S11 was less pronounced. At the saw cut position (0 cm), S11 was not significantly changed when the cut was filled with air or metal. However, there was a significant change at around −36 dB on the left-hand side of the cut (at points −4, −3) and on the right-hand side of the cut (at point 4). This was due to the wood grain acting as a guide for the reflected field, which was reflected from the brass in both directions.
(a) (b) Figure 15. S11 measurements for air vs. metal inside the saw cut located at position 0 in water-saturated wood: (a) E-field direction was parallel to the wood grain and perpendicular to the cut (reverse side); (b) E-field direction was perpendicular to the wood grain and parallel to the cut (reverse side).

Discussion
Using a small cavity-backed slot antenna (Figure 1), S11 and S21 measurements were performed on a kiln-dried pine wood specimen (Figure 2) with the electric field oriented Figure 15. S 11 measurements for air vs. metal inside the saw cut located at position 0 in water-saturated wood: (a) E-field direction was parallel to the wood grain and perpendicular to the cut (reverse side); (b) E-field direction was perpendicular to the wood grain and parallel to the cut (reverse side).

Discussion
Using a small cavity-backed slot antenna (Figure 1), S 11 and S 21 measurements were performed on a kiln-dried pine wood specimen (Figure 2) with the electric field oriented both parallel and perpendicular to the wood grain ( Figure 3). The antenna resonated at 4.4 GHz with little variation (<0.01 GHz) observed over the wood length and above natural and artificial anomalies. The S 11 values ( Figure 5) showed a significant anisotropy of 1.5dB, (z score = 3.8, p < 0.0003) and S 21 values ( Figure 6) showed significant transmission anisotropy of 22 dB (p < 0.0003). The S 11 parallel measurements above a surface knot in the wood surface (Figures 7 and 8) showed a significant decrease of >5 dB (p < 0.0003) accompanied by increases of 5 dB symmetrically located on both sides of the knot. The perpendicular measurements showed a similar variation, but with smaller amplitude.
Two holes were drilled through the wood and S 11 and S 21 measurements were made with and without a steel bolt in the hole (Figures 9 and 10). While the changes in S 11 and S 21 were not significant when the hole was air-filled, the presence of the bolt created a 2 dB and 4 dB reduction in these parallel measurements, respectively, for a hole 3.5 cm below the measurement surface, and the S 21 change increased to >14 ± 2 dB ( Figure 11).
The effect of a saw cut was investigated for water-saturated and dry wood, and for air and a brass plate in the cut (Figures 12-14). Little effect was observed for the air-filled case with dry wood, but the most significant variation was observed for the parallel S 11 case in water-saturated wood, which showed a decrease of 8 ± 2 dB. Although the dry wood sample failed to show an effect immediately above the cut, both the air-and brass-filled cuts in water-saturated wood had similar variations immediately above the cut, with an S 11 variation of >10 ± 3 dB ( Figure 15).

Conclusions
These results have demonstrated that S11 measurements using a cavity-backed antenna at microwave frequencies can be used to identify imperfections in a pine wood beam. This method is particularly useful for measurements across a large, surface knot, but is also appropriate for an air-filled hole or a steel-filled hole parallel to the measurement surface and the E-field of the antenna. It was established that, for timber with a low moisture content, the detection sensitivity was not particularly strong; however, for high-moisture content wood, a saw cut could be clearly identified.
The cavity-backed slot antenna pressed against the wood surface had significant sensitivity to imperfections in the wood at microwave frequencies, and can be regarded as a simple diagnostic tool to measure the integrity of pine wood beams. It is anticipated that the technique can be readily adapted to all wood types and employed in timber beam processing as a continuous tool for wood integrity measurements. In addition, the technique is suitable for measurements on existing wooden beams in buildings as a rapid scanning tool, providing that one flat surface of the beam is exposed. A significant difference was observed in the S 11 and S 21 measurements for the E field perpendicular to the wood grain. The kiln-dried wood had a relatively low conductivity and so the currents generated in the wood by the antenna were relatively weak; consequently, variations in the current direction caused by various imperfections in the wood (knots, holes, bolts, cuts) were not strongly reflected in changes in the two scattering parameters. However, when the conductivity and relatively permittivity were substantially increased by moisture, these parameters were far more sensitive to imperfections.