Experimental Characterization of the Properties of Double-Lap Needled and Hybrid Joints of Carbon/Epoxy Composites

The effect of through-thickness reinforcement by thin 1 mm steel needles (z-pins) on the static tensile strength of double-lap joints of a carbon/epoxy composite was investigated. Two types of joints—z-pinned and hybrid (including glued ones)—were considered. The joints were reinforced in the overlap region with 9, 25, or 36 z-pins. Comparing mechanical properties of the double-lap joints with the corresponding characteristics of their unpinned counterparts, the z-pins were found to be highly effective: the strength and stiffness of the pinned joints increased up to 300% and 280%, respectively. These improvements were due to a transition in the failure mechanism from debonding of the joint in the absence of z-pins to pullout or shear rupture of z-pins or to the tensile failure of laminate adherends, depending on the volume content of the pins.


Introduction
Over the past three decades, the application of composite materials has been increasing continuously from traditional areas (such as aircraft engineering) to various fields in the automobile industry and civil engineering. There are two basic types of joints of composite structural elements: adhesive and mechanical. To realize the potential of advanced composites, especially in lightweight structures, such as aircrafts, it is important to ensure that the adhesively bonded or mechanically fastened joints do not reduce the effectiveness (in terms of the strength of materials and stiffness of the joints) of the structure and be lighter in weight than bolted joints [1]. Mechanical connections remain the key means for the transfer of loads between structural elements made of composite materials. Typically, mechanically fastened joints are made by means of rivets or bolts. In designing the joints, the reduced strength of composite materials to bearing capacity, their low elongation, brittle behavior (for example, carbon composites), creep and stress relaxation must be taken into account.
Holes in materials create stress or strain concentrations and hence reduce their strength [2]. Lekhnitskii [3] assessed the theoretical magnitude of stress concentration in composite material at the edge of a hole. For a plate loaded in tension, the stress concentration factor is calculated by the formula: 12¸`E 1 plastic plate are shown in Table 1. The overlap region was 30 mm long and 30 mm wide. The joints were pinned through the overlap region by using 16 mm long needles made of carbon steel S185 (Erkrath, Germany). The mechanical properties of the needles are shown Table 2. The dimensions and the geometry of the samples are shown in Figure 1. Two types of DLJ were investigated: only pinned with needles and hybrid (needled and adhesively bonded). For a reference, adhesive DLJ (without pins) were also made. The epoxy compound Sikadur 52 was used for production of the adhesive DLJ. The mechanical properties of the adhesive are given in Table 3.   The dimensions and the geometry of the samples are shown in Figure 1. Two types of DLJ were investigated: only pinned with needles and hybrid (needled and adhesively bonded). For a reference, adhesive DLJ (without pins) were also made. The epoxy compound Sikadur ® 52 was used for production of the adhesive DLJ. The mechanical properties of the adhesive are given in Table 3.  The joints were produced using 9, 25, and 36 pins. As shown in Figure 2, the pins were inserted (pinch-fitted) into holes of diameter 1.0 mm drilled through an overlap region ( Figure 1). The considered configurations of DLJ are shown in Figure 3. To determine the apparent strength of the joint, shear tests were performed according to ASTM D 3983. The specimens were tested using MTS 809.40 (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) servo-hydraulic machine with 250 KN load cell. The test setup is shown in Figure 4. The ultimate strength and elongation of the joints were determined in monotonic loading at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. At least six specimens were tested for each type of DLJ.  The joints were produced using 9, 25, and 36 pins. As shown in Figure 2, the pins were inserted (pinch-fitted) into holes of diameter 1.0 mm drilled through an overlap region ( Figure 1). The considered configurations of DLJ are shown in Figure 3.   The dimensions and the geometry of the samples are shown in Figure 1. Two types of DLJ were investigated: only pinned with needles and hybrid (needled and adhesively bonded). For a reference, adhesive DLJ (without pins) were also made. The epoxy compound Sikadur ® 52 was used for production of the adhesive DLJ. The mechanical properties of the adhesive are given in Table 3.  The joints were produced using 9, 25, and 36 pins. As shown in Figure 2, the pins were inserted (pinch-fitted) into holes of diameter 1.0 mm drilled through an overlap region ( Figure 1). The considered configurations of DLJ are shown in Figure 3. To determine the apparent strength of the joint, shear tests were performed according to ASTM D 3983. The specimens were tested using MTS 809.40 (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) servo-hydraulic machine with 250 KN load cell. The test setup is shown in Figure 4. The ultimate strength and elongation of the joints were determined in monotonic loading at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. At least six specimens were tested for each type of DLJ. To determine the apparent strength of the joint, shear tests were performed according to ASTM D 3983. The specimens were tested using MTS 809.40 (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) servo-hydraulic machine with 250 KN load cell. The test setup is shown in Figure 4. The ultimate strength and elongation of the joints were determined in monotonic loading at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. At least six specimens were tested for each type of DLJ.   The applied load-displacement diagrams were recorded during testing. The shear stresses were calculated dividing the applied tensile load by the total bond area. The ultimate shear stress, the strain at the maximum shear stress, and the shear stiffness of DLJ (in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate loads) were also calculated using the load-displacement recordings.

Results and Discussion
The tests were carried out to assess the effect of content (i.e., number) of the z-pins on the strength and deformation properties of the joints. Figures 5 and 6 show the averaged load-displacement diagrams of pinned-only and hybrid DLJ with a different content of the z-pins. As can be observed, the shear stiffness increases gradually with the number of the pins. The curve of the unpinned (adhesive) joint rises almost linearly up to the peak stress of 14.2 MPa afterwards failing in a brittle manner due to the bond delamination. The failure tends to be catastrophic, which is a characteristic of the epoxy resin (a rather brittle material). Similar results were observed for stitched joints [11].   The applied load-displacement diagrams were recorded during testing. The shear stresses were calculated dividing the applied tensile load by the total bond area. The ultimate shear stress, the strain at the maximum shear stress, and the shear stiffness of DLJ (in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate loads) were also calculated using the load-displacement recordings.

Results and Discussion
The tests were carried out to assess the effect of content (i.e., number) of the z-pins on the strength and deformation properties of the joints. Figures 5 and 6 show the averaged load-displacement diagrams of pinned-only and hybrid DLJ with a different content of the z-pins. As can be observed, the shear stiffness increases gradually with the number of the pins. The curve of the unpinned (adhesive) joint rises almost linearly up to the peak stress of 14.2 MPa afterwards failing in a brittle manner due to the bond delamination. The failure tends to be catastrophic, which is a characteristic of the epoxy resin (a rather brittle material). Similar results were observed for stitched joints [11].  The applied load-displacement diagrams were recorded during testing. The shear stresses were calculated dividing the applied tensile load by the total bond area. The ultimate shear stress, the strain at the maximum shear stress, and the shear stiffness of DLJ (in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate loads) were also calculated using the load-displacement recordings.

Results and Discussion
The tests were carried out to assess the effect of content (i.e., number) of the z-pins on the strength and deformation properties of the joints. Figures 5 and 6 show the averaged load-displacement diagrams of pinned-only and hybrid DLJ with a different content of the z-pins. As can be observed, the shear stiffness increases gradually with the number of the pins. The curve of the unpinned (adhesive) joint rises almost linearly up to the peak stress of 14.2 MPa afterwards failing in a brittle manner due to the bond delamination. The failure tends to be catastrophic, which is a characteristic of the epoxy resin (a rather brittle material). Similar results were observed for stitched joints [11]. and deformation properties of the joints. Figures 5 and 6 show the averaged load-displacement diagrams of pinned-only and hybrid DLJ with a different content of the z-pins. As can be observed, the shear stiffness increases gradually with the number of the pins. The curve of the unpinned (adhesive) joint rises almost linearly up to the peak stress of 14.2 MPa afterwards failing in a brittle manner due to the bond delamination. The failure tends to be catastrophic, which is a characteristic of the epoxy resin (a rather brittle material). Similar results were observed for stitched joints [11].  Diagrams of the pinned ( Figure 5) and the hybrid joints ( Figure 6) initially increase in the same way as those of the adhesive joint, though possessing higher stiffness and strength. For the hybrid joints, a small drop in the diagram occurs (at deformations between 0.4 and 1.5 mm, see Figure 6) before the load increases up to the ultimate value. Such a drop corresponds to the opening of a debonding crack (without mechanical destruction of the joint). The pins, bridging the cracks, resist the applied load. For the pinned joint ( Figure 5), the drop in the load was not observed; furthermore, the ultimate load bearing capacity corresponded to the elongation greater than it was achieved in the hybrid DLJ. The test results are summarized in Table 4 and Figures 7 and 8. The following observations can be made to compare deformation behavior of DLJ:  Improvement of the mechanical properties of DLJ is significantly correlated with the number of pins (the minimum value of the determination coefficient r 2 is equal to 0.94).  Application of z-pins improved the mechanical properties of DLJ. As can be observed from Table 4, the strength and the stiffness (calculated in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate load) of the pinned-only joints was increased by 300% and 120%, respectively. For the hybrid joints, the increase in both strength and stiffness was the same (i.e., 280%).  Comparing the mechanical properties of the reference (adhesive) and pinned-only joints (Figures 7a and 8a), the extrapolated regression predictions clarify the tendency for the number of pins to increase the strength; for the shear stiffness, this effect is less evident.  Increment in the shear strength related to the number of pins is less significant in the hybrid DLJ in comparison with the pinned ones (compare the slope coefficients of the regression line, which are equal to 1.547 and 1.158 for the hybrid and pinned joints, respectively). Considering the shear stiffness, the opposite tendency can be evidenced from Figure 8. For instance, the shear stiffness of the hybrid DLJ with 36 pins is 1.7 times higher than that of a similar pinned joint (Table 4). Most probably, this effect is the consequence of the effective composite action between z-pins and adhesive achieved in the proposed hybrid DLJ.  The hybrid connection reduces deformability of the joint -the elongation corresponding to the maximum load of the pinned DLJ was twice the hybrid counterpart one (Table 4). Diagrams of the pinned ( Figure 5) and the hybrid joints ( Figure 6) initially increase in the same way as those of the adhesive joint, though possessing higher stiffness and strength. For the hybrid joints, a small drop in the diagram occurs (at deformations between 0.4 and 1.5 mm, see Figure 6) before the load increases up to the ultimate value. Such a drop corresponds to the opening of a debonding crack (without mechanical destruction of the joint). The pins, bridging the cracks, resist the applied load. For the pinned joint ( Figure 5), the drop in the load was not observed; furthermore, the ultimate load bearing capacity corresponded to the elongation greater than it was achieved in the hybrid DLJ. The test results are summarized in Table 4  ‚ Application of z-pins improved the mechanical properties of DLJ. As can be observed from Table 4, the strength and the stiffness (calculated in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate load) of the pinned-only joints was increased by 300% and 120%, respectively. For the hybrid joints, the increase in both strength and stiffness was the same (i.e., 280%).
‚ Comparing the mechanical properties of the reference (adhesive) and pinned-only joints (Figures 7a and 8a), the extrapolated regression predictions clarify the tendency for the number of pins to increase the strength; for the shear stiffness, this effect is less evident.
‚ Increment in the shear strength related to the number of pins is less significant in the hybrid DLJ in comparison with the pinned ones (compare the slope coefficients of the regression line, which are equal to 1.547 and 1.158 for the hybrid and pinned joints, respectively). Considering the shear stiffness, the opposite tendency can be evidenced from Figure 8. For instance, the shear stiffness of the hybrid DLJ with 36 pins is 1.7 times higher than that of a similar pinned joint (Table 4).
Most probably, this effect is the consequence of the effective composite action between z-pins and adhesive achieved in the proposed hybrid DLJ.
‚ The hybrid connection reduces deformability of the joint -the elongation corresponding to the maximum load of the pinned DLJ was twice the hybrid counterpart one (Table 4).

5
 Comparing the mechanical properties of the reference (adhesive) and pinned-only joints (Figures 7a and 8a), the extrapolated regression predictions clarify the tendency for the number of pins to increase the strength; for the shear stiffness, this effect is less evident.  Increment in the shear strength related to the number of pins is less significant in the hybrid DLJ in comparison with the pinned ones (compare the slope coefficients of the regression line, which are equal to 1.547 and 1.158 for the hybrid and pinned joints, respectively). Considering the shear stiffness, the opposite tendency can be evidenced from Figure 8. For instance, the shear stiffness of the hybrid DLJ with 36 pins is 1.7 times higher than that of a similar pinned joint (Table 4). Most probably, this effect is the consequence of the effective composite action between z-pins and adhesive achieved in the proposed hybrid DLJ.  The hybrid connection reduces deformability of the joint -the elongation corresponding to the maximum load of the pinned DLJ was twice the hybrid counterpart one (Table 4).    (Figures 9b and 10). Independently of the presence of additional adhesive connection, such a failure mechanism was characteristic of all of the pinned joints. Due to the loss of the adhesive connection, the failure of the reference joints was brittle. The observed bridging effect of the z-pins (Figure 9), transferring the shear stresses through the crack, is the general benefit of the pinned DLJ compared to the reference ones.  Figures 9 and 10 illustrate failure mechanism of the selected hybrid DLJ. It can be observed that the local bending of the pins was the cause of the failure of DLJ with 36 z-pins (Figure 9a). Reduction of the number of pins results in shear failure of some of them (Figures 9b and 10). Independently of the presence of additional adhesive connection, such a failure mechanism was characteristic of all of the pinned joints. Due to the loss of the adhesive connection, the failure of the reference joints was brittle. The observed bridging effect of the z-pins (Figure 9), transferring the shear stresses through the crack, is the general benefit of the pinned DLJ compared to the reference ones. the local bending of the pins was the cause of the failure of DLJ with 36 z-pins (Figure 9a). Reduction of the number of pins results in shear failure of some of them (Figures 9b and 10). Independently of the presence of additional adhesive connection, such a failure mechanism was characteristic of all of the pinned joints. Due to the loss of the adhesive connection, the failure of the reference joints was brittle. The observed bridging effect of the z-pins (Figure 9), transferring the shear stresses through the crack, is the general benefit of the pinned DLJ compared to the reference ones.   6 Figures 9 and 10 illustrate failure mechanism of the selected hybrid DLJ. It can be observed that the local bending of the pins was the cause of the failure of DLJ with 36 z-pins (Figure 9a). Reduction of the number of pins results in shear failure of some of them (Figures 9b and 10). Independently of the presence of additional adhesive connection, such a failure mechanism was characteristic of all of the pinned joints. Due to the loss of the adhesive connection, the failure of the reference joints was brittle. The observed bridging effect of the z-pins (Figure 9), transferring the shear stresses through the crack, is the general benefit of the pinned DLJ compared to the reference ones.

Conclusions
A new pinning technique of double-lap joints (DLJ) has been proposed. It is based on application of thin steel needles of 1 mm diameter (z-pins) as through-thickness reinforcement of a double-lap joint. The tensile behavior of double-lap joints of a carbon fiber epoxy laminate was experimentally investigated. Two types of DLJ were considered: purely pinned and hybrid (additionally glued) joints. The joints were produced using 9, 25, and 36 pins. For the reference, adhesive DLJ (without pins) were also made. The obtained results revealed that: ‚ Improvement of the mechanical properties of DLJ is significantly correlated with the number of z-pins: the strength and stiffness (calculated in the range from 0% to 10% of the ultimate load) of DLJ increased up to 300% and 280%, respectively.
‚ Increment in the shear strength related to the number of pins is less significant in the hybrid DLJ compared to the pinned ones. However, the opposite tendency was evidenced considering the shear stiffness of the joints. The shear stiffness of the hybrid DLJ with 36 pins was found to be 1.7 times higher than that of a similar pinned joint.
‚ The hybrid connection reduces deformability of the joint-the elongation corresponding to the maximum load of the pinned DLJ was twice that of the hybrid counterpart.
‚ The observed bridging effect of the z-pins, transferring the shear stresses through the crack, is the general benefit of the pinned DLJ compared with the reference adhesive joints, the failure of which was their brittleness.