Investigation of Tensile Properties of Different Infill Pattern Structures of 3D-Printed PLA Polymers: Analysis and Validation Using Finite Element Analysis in ANSYS

The advancement of 3D-printing technology has ushered in a new era in the production of machine components, building materials, prototypes, and so on. In 3D-printing techniques, the infill reduces the amount of material used, thereby reducing the printing time and sustaining the aesthetics of the products. Infill patterns play a significant role in the property of the material. In this research, the mechanical properties of specimens are investigated for gyroid, rhombile, circular, truncated octahedron, and honeycomb infill structures (hexagonal). Additionally, the tensile properties of PLA 3D-printed objects concerning their infill pattern are demonstrated. The specimens were prepared with various infill patterns to determine the tensile properties. The fracture of the specimen was simulated and the maximum yield strengths for different infill structures and infill densities were determined. The results show the hexagonal pattern of infill holds remarkable mechanical properties compared with the other infill structures. Through the variation of infill density, the desired tensile strength of PLA can be obtained based on the applications and the optimal weight of the printed parts.


Introduction
Rapid prototyping is a time-saving additive manufacturing technique used to reduce wastage and create complex models. It is widely used in the industrial, manufacturing, and development sectors. Three-dimensional(3D) printing can be achieved in both metals and polymer materials, based on the applications. The material infills, support, and layer thickness play a significant role in the strength of the products. Infill structures, such as grids and triangular, hexagonal, triangular, and linear structures are the standard infill structures. Together with the infill structures, infill density also plays a crucial role in the mechanical properties of the 3D-printed objects. The effect of infill density on caries in a PETG part manufactured using the fusion deposition modeling technique was explored. The mechanical properties were found to be significantly influenced by infill structures and density [1,2]. The effect of infill patterns on the mechanical properties was investigated in lightweight 3D-printed PLA cellular parts; the variation of relative flexural modulus concerning the relative density of the material was exhibited in the research. Moreover, this investigation demonstrated the characteristics of infill structures. The hexagonal infill had a higher yield strength compared with square and diagonal structures [3][4][5]. The tensile strength of commercial polymer materials was investigated for the Fused Filament Fabrication 3D-Printing technique. It showed the theoretical and experimental masses of 3D-printed parts for different infill ratios. The specimen with a higher mass possessed good tensile properties [6]. Besides the investigations of mechanical properties with standard infills, topology optimization was carried out to reduce the volume of the material to acquire good load-carrying capacity. The porous structure of the infill was designed based on the local volume of the material. The performance of the bone models and their discrete formulation were compared to honeycomb structures [7,8]. Similar research on mechanical properties was conducted in 3D-printed PLA materials in accordance with the ASTM D638 Type IV Standard, with the yield strength of the specimen tested using a universal testing machine and validated using finite element analysis using ANSYS software [9]. The properties of bioresorbable polymer test specimens with varied infill designs and infill ratios were investigated in biomedical applications. The mechanical properties of commodity implant grade polymers such as PLLA and Lacto flex vary significantly with infill density [10,11]. The mechanical properties of ABS 3D-printed parts were tested concerning the temperature, fill density, velocity of print, and so on. The tensile strength and impact resistance of the specimen were examined and it was demonstrated that the printing time was higher for 100% infills. Hence, the results of the experiment suggest an infill range of less than 100% infill, based on the applications and considering the load parameters. [12,13]. Design and topology optimization were carried out for 3D-printed wax patterns for rapid investment casting. A commercial topology optimization tool was utilized in the experimentation to print the wax patterns; patterning of the optimized design was exhibited to reduce the weight of the 3D-printed material [14,15]. Shell-infill composite minimum compliance topology optimization was carried out for additive manufacturing. According to the findings of this study, the numerical technique was linked to the geometry of the object. The composition of non-uniform gradient infill and uniform infill was compared in this research that correlated the relative density and relative stiffness with the infill ratio percentages [16,17]. Investigations of polylactic acid material on its mechanical properties by varying the infill structures we recarried out with triangular, grid, quarter cubic and tri-hexagonal structures. The SEM observations in this study exhibited triangular infill structures produced by raster bonding, which implies good mechanical properties. In triangular infills, a lower number of voids and an absence of racket lines were observed. The results showed that the bonding strength and the optimized infill structures of the layers lead to the good mechanical properties of 3D printed objects [18]. Infill optimization for 3D-printed parts was carried out based on the structural dimensions. This experimentation introduced optimization methodology and, subsequently, integration of global optimization methodology was carried out. A finite element method was applied to the lattice infills and demonstrated that the technique depicted by the results possesses good characteristics in the additive manufacturing process [19,20]. Another approach to shell-infill structures was carried out with the topology optimization technique. The constant-spaced mesh infills were replaced by gradient infills using this technique. The 3D-printed objects possessed remarkable mechanical properties and a reduction in print time was achieved [21][22][23].
Optimal selection of the infill structures was carried out for fusion deposition modeling of PLA materials. The tensile and three-point bending tests reveal the mechanical properties of the PLA-printed parts and showed a significant change in the mechanical properties in terms of print speed, feed rate, and upright orientation [24,25]. Based on previous research on infill structures, the yield strength of the 3D-printed specimen was investigated. Layer thickness and print speed play a significant role in the change in mechanical properties. The common infills are hexagonal, linear, circular, triangular, and linear structures. The development of new structures, such as spherical, rhombic, truncated octahedron, and gyroid structures leads to the creation of a space in the research into the performance of these infills and their mechanical properties. In this research, the mechanical properties of specimens are investigated for gyroid, rhombile, circular, truncated octahedron, and honeycomb structures (hexagon).
Open-work filling has better mechanical properties than solid because it takes less time to print and has better mechanical properties.
The tri-hexagon infill pattern with varied densities of 20%, 40%, and 60% was investigated. A maximum time of 227 min was observed for printing the 60% infill density. The print time increased with infill density. Mechanical properties and printing time were investigated [26]. Ammonium perchlorate-polylactic acid has been successfully 3D printed to test its structural and energetic capabilities. The capabilities of combustible 3D-printing technologies were investigated [27]. Ceramic-filled composite 3D-printed objects were investigated to test their mechanical properties. After the chemical structure modification of zirconium oxide and aluminum oxide ceramic fillers, the material was 3D printed and subjected to mechanical tests [28]. Printing parameters, orientation, raster angle, and materials affected the mechanical properties of fused deposition 3D-printed parts. The proper alterations in the printing parameters led to a significant increase in tensile strength. The factor levels were different from the optimal factor settings [29]. The fused deposition modeling prototypes were investigated using dynamic loading with reinforced composite wires. SiC and Al 2 O 3 in a Nylon-6 matrix were used as the feedstock filament. The results exhibited an improvement in mechanical properties, such as yield strength, tensile properties, elongation percentage, and Young's modulus [30]. The 3D-printed specimen was modelled as per ASTM D638 Type IV and subjected to mechanical tests. The ASTM D638 standard is commonly used to test reinforced and non-reinforced plastics. Test samples were placed in the grips of the universal tester at a specified grip separation and pulled until failure [9].

Materials and Methods
Commercially available Augment 3Di-3D printing (Red) PLA of 1.75 mm diameter was used for the extrusion process. Flash forge Dreamer 3D printer was used to manufacture the test specimens as per ASTM D628 standard to test the tensile properties. The machine was set at a Build Volume: 9.1"× 5.9"× 5.5" and a layer thickness of 100-500 microns of resolution. A nozzle of 0.4 mm diameter was used to extrude the PLA filament in the manufacturing of the test specimen. A print speed of 200 mm/s and a heated build platform of 120 • C are the maximum ranges for the machine. The maximum positioning precision of the printer was 0.1-0.2 mm. The slicing software Flash Print was used for slicing the part into layers and the creation of infill structures was carried out by this software. For the sliced parts, G-codes were sent to the 3D printer using the software. The dimension of the ASTM D 628 specimen is shown in Figure 1. The standard geometry of the tensile test specimen as per ASTM D628 was modeled in Creo Elements. The part file was converted to stereolithographic format (STL) and imported into the Flash Print 3D Printer application for slicing and to send the G-codes to the printer. The static structural module was utilized to create a tensile stress environment. A tensile load of 20.2 MPa was applied on the two sides of the specimen [31,32]. The local stresses were simulated to investigate the mechanical properties of the specimen with gyroid, rhombile, circular, truncated octahedron, and honeycomb structures (hexagonal) patterns with varied infill ratios. The infill structures were designed in Fusion 360 with various infill densities and exported to flash print and ANSYS applications for manufacturing the specimen and evaluating its mechanical properties, respectively. In our additive manufacturing process, 120 °C was maintained and an extrusion temperature of 210 °C was maintained in the extruder to melt the PLA filament. A print speed of 60 mm/s and a layer thickness of 0.18 mm were maintained throughout the manufacturing of the specimen. This layer thickness was consistently maintained for all varied percentages of infill density and infill structures, with the first layer of thickness of the specimen being maintained at 0.27 mm. The structure's infill was developed in Fusion 360. It was tested on a universal testing machine. The specimen was loaded into the testing machine jaws and hydraulic loads were applied between the two ends of the specimen. The loads were applied gradually until the specimen fractured due to the applied tensile loads. The 3Dprinted PLA specimen is shown in Figure 2.

Printer Setting
The material density was taken as 1.24 kg/cm 3 for polylactic acid. In printer settings, the specimen is in the boundary regions of the platform with 0° of orientation for printing the specimen without supports. The infill structure is shown in Figure 3. For finite element analysis, a specimen 3D model was imported in IGEs format and yield stress and fracture growth were analyzed using static structural and explicit dynamics analysis. In the preprocessor, polylactic acid material was assigned a Young's modulus of 13.8 GPa and a density of 1.24 kg/cm 2 was given to calculate the mechanical properties [33]. Automatic mesh generation was selected with a mesh relevance of 2. In explicit dynamics analysis settings, one end of the specimen was fixed and the other end of the specimen was placed on the displacement constraint that replicates the universal testing machine jaws. An end The standard geometry of the tensile test specimen as per ASTM D628 was modeled in Creo Elements. The part file was converted to stereolithographic format (STL) and imported into the Flash Print 3D Printer application for slicing and to send the G-codes to the printer. The static structural module was utilized to create a tensile stress environment. A tensile load of 20.2 MPa was applied on the two sides of the specimen [31,32]. The local stresses were simulated to investigate the mechanical properties of the specimen with gyroid, rhombile, circular, truncated octahedron, and honeycomb structures (hexagonal) patterns with varied infill ratios. The infill structures were designed in Fusion 360 with various infill densities and exported to flash print and ANSYS applications for manufacturing the specimen and evaluating its mechanical properties, respectively. In our additive manufacturing process, 120 • C was maintained and an extrusion temperature of 210 • C was maintained in the extruder to melt the PLA filament. A print speed of 60 mm/s and a layer thickness of 0.18 mm were maintained throughout the manufacturing of the specimen. This layer thickness was consistently maintained for all varied percentages of infill density and infill structures, with the first layer of thickness of the specimen being maintained at 0.27 mm. The structure's infill was developed in Fusion 360. It was tested on a universal testing machine. The specimen was loaded into the testing machine jaws and hydraulic loads were applied between the two ends of the specimen. The loads were applied gradually until the specimen fractured due to the applied tensile loads. The 3D-printed PLA specimen is shown in Figure 2. The standard geometry of the tensile test specimen as per ASTM D628 was modeled in Creo Elements. The part file was converted to stereolithographic format (STL) and imported into the Flash Print 3D Printer application for slicing and to send the G-codes to the printer. The static structural module was utilized to create a tensile stress environment. A tensile load of 20.2 MPa was applied on the two sides of the specimen [31,32]. The local stresses were simulated to investigate the mechanical properties of the specimen with gyroid, rhombile, circular, truncated octahedron, and honeycomb structures (hexagonal) patterns with varied infill ratios. The infill structures were designed in Fusion 360 with various infill densities and exported to flash print and ANSYS applications for manufacturing the specimen and evaluating its mechanical properties, respectively. In our additive manufacturing process, 120 °C was maintained and an extrusion temperature of 210 °C was maintained in the extruder to melt the PLA filament. A print speed of 60 mm/s and a layer thickness of 0.18 mm were maintained throughout the manufacturing of the specimen. This layer thickness was consistently maintained for all varied percentages of infill density and infill structures, with the first layer of thickness of the specimen being maintained at 0.27 mm. The structure's infill was developed in Fusion 360. It was tested on a universal testing machine. The specimen was loaded into the testing machine jaws and hydraulic loads were applied between the two ends of the specimen. The loads were applied gradually until the specimen fractured due to the applied tensile loads. The 3Dprinted PLA specimen is shown in Figure 2.

Printer Setting
The material density was taken as 1.24 kg/cm 3 for polylactic acid. In printer settings, the specimen is in the boundary regions of the platform with 0° of orientation for printing the specimen without supports. The infill structure is shown in Figure 3. For finite element analysis, a specimen 3D model was imported in IGEs format and yield stress and fracture growth were analyzed using static structural and explicit dynamics analysis. In the preprocessor, polylactic acid material was assigned a Young's modulus of 13.8 GPa and a density of 1.24 kg/cm 2 was given to calculate the mechanical properties [33]. Automatic mesh generation was selected with a mesh relevance of 2. In explicit dynamics analysis settings, one end of the specimen was fixed and the other end of the specimen was placed on the displacement constraint that replicates the universal testing machine jaws. An end

Printer Setting
The material density was taken as 1.24 kg/cm 3 for polylactic acid. In printer settings, the specimen is in the boundary regions of the platform with 0 • of orientation for printing the specimen without supports. The infill structure is shown in Figure 3. For finite element analysis, a specimen 3D model was imported in IGEs format and yield stress and fracture growth were analyzed using static structural and explicit dynamics analysis. In the preprocessor, polylactic acid material was assigned a Young's modulus of 13.8 GPa and a density of 1.24 kg/cm 2 was given to calculate the mechanical properties [33]. Automatic mesh generation was selected with a mesh relevance of 2. In explicit dynamics analysis settings, one end of the specimen was fixed and the other end of the specimen was placed on the displacement constraint that replicates the universal testing machine jaws. An end time of 0.001 s was set and a displacement of 10 mm was assigned. It was assumed that the fracture growth and failure of the specimen would occur within a distance of 10 mm of displacement. The stress concentration, strain, and energy absorbed by the specimen were analyzed in the ANSYS workbench for hexagonal (honeycomb), rhombile, truncated octahedron, gyroid and spherical infill structures [33,34]. time of 0.001 s was set and a displacement of 10 mm was assigned. It was assumed that the fracture growth and failure of the specimen would occur within a distance of 10 mm of displacement. The stress concentration, strain, and energy absorbed by the specimen were analyzed in the ANSYS workbench for hexagonal (honeycomb), rhombile, truncated octahedron, gyroid and spherical infill structures [33,34].

Tensile Test
The specimen was loaded in the universal testing machine and the yield strength was observed for the five different infill structures, namely gyroid, rhombic, spherical and honeycomb structures (hexagonal). The displacement of the crosshead was achieved by the hydraulic system, and the pressure applied was noted at the fracture point of the specimen. The tensile strength of the specimen was taken from the pressure at the time of failure of the specimen in the testing crossheads. The ASTM D 638 specimen was loaded with various infill structures with varying infill rations, and the pressure at the specimen failure was recorded [35,36]. The fixed crosshead and movable crossheads of the universal testing machine and the loading of the specimen on the machine are exhibited in Figure 4.

Tensile Test
The specimen was loaded in the universal testing machine and the yield strength was observed for the five different infill structures, namely gyroid, rhombic, spherical and honeycomb structures (hexagonal). The displacement of the crosshead was achieved by the hydraulic system, and the pressure applied was noted at the fracture point of the specimen. The tensile strength of the specimen was taken from the pressure at the time of failure of the specimen in the testing crossheads. The ASTM D 638 specimen was loaded with various infill structures with varying infill rations, and the pressure at the specimen failure was recorded [35,36]. The fixed crosshead and movable crossheads of the universal testing machine and the loading of the specimen on the machine are exhibited in Figure 4. time of 0.001 s was set and a displacement of 10 mm was assigned. It was assumed that the fracture growth and failure of the specimen would occur within a distance of 10 mm of displacement. The stress concentration, strain, and energy absorbed by the specimen were analyzed in the ANSYS workbench for hexagonal (honeycomb), rhombile, truncated octahedron, gyroid and spherical infill structures [33,34].

Tensile Test
The specimen was loaded in the universal testing machine and the yield strength was observed for the five different infill structures, namely gyroid, rhombic, spherical and honeycomb structures (hexagonal). The displacement of the crosshead was achieved by the hydraulic system, and the pressure applied was noted at the fracture point of the specimen. The tensile strength of the specimen was taken from the pressure at the time of failure of the specimen in the testing crossheads. The ASTM D 638 specimen was loaded with various infill structures with varying infill rations, and the pressure at the specimen failure was recorded [35,36]. The fixed crosshead and movable crossheads of the universal testing machine and the loading of the specimen on the machine are exhibited in Figure 4.

Results and Discussion
The tensile properties were observed in the universal testing machine through fracture development and failure of the material. It was observed that the specimen can withstand a 31.69 MPa tensile load. The maximum yield strength of the specimen was greater irrespective of the infill structure. Similarly, increasing the infill ratio of the specimen reduced the deviation of yield strength [37][38][39]. This phenomenon demonstrates thatthe increment in infill ratio leads to an increase in the yield strength, which is replicated in the ANSYS results. The variation of tensile stress for various infill structures are exhibited in Figure 5.

Results and Discussions
The tensile properties were observed in the universal testing machine throug ture development and failure of the material. It was observed that the specimen ca stand a 31.69 MPa tensile load. The maximum yield strength of the specimen was irrespective of the infill structure. Similarly, increasing the infill ratio of the specim duced the deviation of yield strength [37][38][39]. This phenomenon demonstrates tha crement in infill ratio leads to an increase in the yield strength, which is replicated ANSYS results. The variation of tensile stress for various infill structures are exhib Figure 5. This indicates the similarity of yield stress observed in the hexagonal infill st (honeycomb) which possesses13.79 MPa of ultimate tensile strength. From other i was found that the hexagonal infill structure holds good tensile properties. The pa increasing yield strength is observed in all infill structures proportionately to the of the material being increased. Spherical and gyroid infill structures show lower values due to the infill material bonding strength [40,41]. The area of contact betw patterns in the infill is smaller compared with that of the honeycomb structures. Th nomenon leads to a decrease in bond strength and the lowest tensile strength. The structure infill has 8.56 MPa of ultimate tensile strength for the same infill ratio, w hexagonal structures possess 13.79 MPa of yield strength [42].
The fracture development of the ASTM D 638 specimen was simulated in A The development stages are shown in the figure. The mechanical stresses acting specimen at one end lead to an increase in stress at the weaker regions [43]. The load is transformed from the layers to the inner layers of the infill. The bonding infill is perpendicular to the direction of the tensile force applied since the orienta the specimen in printing is 0°. Finite element results of a hexagonal infill specim shown in Figure 6. This indicates the similarity of yield stress observed in the hexagonal infill structure (honeycomb) which possesses 13.79 MPa of ultimate tensile strength. From other infills, it was found that the hexagonal infill structure holds good tensile properties. The pattern of increasing yield strength is observed in all infill structures proportionately to the weight of the material being increased. Spherical and gyroid infill structures show lower tensile values due to the infill material bonding strength [40,41]. The area of contact between the patterns in the infill is smaller compared with that of the honeycomb structures. This phenomenon leads to a decrease in bond strength and the lowest tensile strength. The gyroid structure infill has 8.56 MPa of ultimate tensile strength for the same infill ratio, while the hexagonal structures possess 13.79 MPa of yield strength [42].
The fracture development of the ASTM D 638 specimen was simulated in ANSYS. The development stages are shown in the figure. The mechanical stresses acting on the specimen at one end lead to an increase in stress at the weaker regions [43]. The tensile load is transformed from the layers to the inner layers of the infill. The bonding of the infill is perpendicular to the direction of the tensile force applied since the orientation of the specimen in printing is 0 • . Finite element results of a hexagonal infill specimen are shown in Figure 6. The fracture of the specimen is due to the breaking of bonds in the infill structures. From the observations, the hexagonal infill structure carries good tensile properties due to its high bonding area [44,45]. The 3D-printed ASTMD638 specimen after failure is shown in Figure 7. The results show that the fracture growth is from the infill bonds and, after increasing the pressure, failure occurs in the bonding areas. Fracture is observed at the neck region of the specimen. The relation between the maximum yield strength obtained from the tensile tests and the ANSYS results are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It was observed that irrespective of the infill structures (gyroid, rhombic, spherical, and honeycomb), the yield strengths are closer to each other since the material ratio increases in the infill structures: the yield strength is proportional to the bonding layers and leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the material.  The fracture of the specimen is due to the breaking of bonds in the infill structures. From the observations, the hexagonal infill structure carries good tensile properties due to its high bonding area [44,45]. The 3D-printed ASTMD638 specimen after failure is shown in Figure 7. The results show that the fracture growth is from the infill bonds and, after increasing the pressure, failure occurs in the bonding areas. Fracture is observed at the neck region of the specimen. The fracture of the specimen is due to the breaking of bonds in the infill structures. From the observations, the hexagonal infill structure carries good tensile properties due to its high bonding area [44,45]. The 3D-printed ASTMD638 specimen after failure is shown in Figure 7. The results show that the fracture growth is from the infill bonds and, after increasing the pressure, failure occurs in the bonding areas. Fracture is observed at the neck region of the specimen. The relation between the maximum yield strength obtained from the tensile tests and the ANSYS results are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It was observed that irrespective of the infill structures (gyroid, rhombic, spherical, and honeycomb), the yield strengths are closer to each other since the material ratio increases in the infill structures: the yield strength is proportional to the bonding layers and leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the material.  The relation between the maximum yield strength obtained from the tensile tests and the ANSYS results are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It was observed that irrespective of the infill structures (gyroid, rhombic, spherical, and honeycomb), the yield strengths are closer to each other since the material ratio increases in the infill structures: the yield strength is proportional to the bonding layers and leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the material. The fracture of the specimen is due to the breaking of bonds in the infill structures. From the observations, the hexagonal infill structure carries good tensile properties due to its high bonding area [44,45]. The 3D-printed ASTMD638 specimen after failure is shown in Figure 7. The results show that the fracture growth is from the infill bonds and, after increasing the pressure, failure occurs in the bonding areas. Fracture is observed at the neck region of the specimen. The relation between the maximum yield strength obtained from the tensile tests and the ANSYS results are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It was observed that irrespective of the infill structures (gyroid, rhombic, spherical, and honeycomb), the yield strengths are closer to each other since the material ratio increases in the infill structures: the yield strength is proportional to the bonding layers and leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the material.  The hardness of the 3D-printed specimen was measured using a Shore D hardness testing machine with a measuring range of 0.5-100 HD. The hardness test setup and microscopic image of the indentation are exhibited in Figure 10. A test load of 0-45 N was applied to the test specimen, which was fixed to a fixed slab. The indenter needle was pressed during the test for 1 s. Hardness values of 46 HD, 56 HD, 61 HD, and 84 HD were observed in PLA 3D-printed specimens with 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% infills, respectively. The 80% infill ratio showed a superior shore D hardness value compared with other specimens. However, the increased hardness value in this sample was mainly due to the large volume of material filled in layer by layer.  The hardness of the 3D-printed specimen was measured using a Shore D hardness testing machine with a measuring range of 0.5-100 HD. The hardness test setup and microscopic image of the indentation are exhibited in Figure 10. A test load of 0-45 N was applied to the test specimen, which was fixed to a fixed slab. The indenter needle was pressed during the test for 1 s. Hardness values of 46 HD, 56 HD, 61 HD, and 84 HD were observed in PLA 3D-printed specimens with 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% infills, respectively. The 80% infill ratio showed a superior shore D hardness value compared with other specimens. However, the increased hardness value in this sample was mainly due to the large volume of material filled in layer by layer. The hardness of the 3D-printed specimen was measured using a Shore D hardnes testing machine with a measuring range of 0.5-100 HD. The hardness test setup and mi croscopic image of the indentation are exhibited in Figure 10. A test load of 0-45 N wa applied to the test specimen, which was fixed to a fixed slab. The indenter needle wa pressed during the test for 1 s. Hardness values of 46 HD, 56 HD, 61 HD, and 84 HD were observed in PLA 3D-printed specimens with 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% infills, respectively The 80% infill ratio showed a superior shore D hardness value compared with other spec imens. However, the increased hardness value in this sample was mainly due to the large volume of material filled in layer by layer.

Conclusions
In this experimentation, the yield strength of the infill structures and density ratio were investigated. The test results were validated using finite element analysis and, based on the values, yield stress, local stresses, and fracture development concerning the infill density and infill structures were tabulated. From the results, optimal weight, infill ratio, and infill structures could be selected based on the requirements of tensile strength applications. Infill patterns for gyroid, rhombic, spherical, and honeycomb structures (hexagon) were3D modelled and sliced using Flash print and Autodesk Fusion 360 slicing software. The specimen was manufactured as per ASTMD638 and tested on a universal testing machine to examine its tensile properties. The findings are supported by previous research and ANSYs finite element analysis. The relationship between the infill ratio and infill structures with the yield strength is demonstrated in this investigation. The hexagonal (honeycomb) infill structure possesses good tensile behavior compared with other infill rations. Moreover, it is observed that the printing time increases with respect to the infill ratio. The printing time of the specimen is reduced at a 100% infill ratio since the reduction in travel time of the extruder compensates for the reduction in manufacturing time.