Strain-Hardening and High-Ductile Behavior of Alkali-Activated Slag-Based Composites with Added Zirconia Silica Fume

This paper presents an experimental study on the effects of zirconia silica fume on the composite properties and cracking patterns of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites. Four mixtures were prepared with added zirconia silica fume and varying water-to-binder ratio. Polyethylene fiber was used as a reinforcing fiber for all the mixtures at a volumetric ratio of 2.0% cubic specimens and uniaxial tensile specimens were prepared to evaluate their density, compressive strength, and tensile behavior. The test results demonstrated that the compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity of the composite can be simultaneously improved by incorporating zirconia silica fume. A mixture incorporating zirconia silica fume showed high-ductile behavior of 26.5% higher tensile strength, and 13.7% higher tensile strain capacity than the mixture without zirconia silica fume. The composite with added zirconia silica fume also showed excellent cracking patterns, i.e., narrow crack spacing and crack width.


Introduction
Concrete is an economic construction material with relatively high strength and durability, and is the most frequently used construction material along with steel. Concrete's performance can also be fairly easily adjusted by selecting its constituent materials, and by varying their proportion in the mixture. However, concrete also has low tensile strength and brittle behavior, which is an inherent disadvantage [1,2]. Cement production also generates large amounts of carbon dioxide. Previous studies have reported that about 1 ton of carbon dioxide is emitted for each ton of cement [3]. It has also been reported that about 5% of the world's total artificially generated carbon dioxide is produced by the cement industry [4].
As a new construction material to mitigate the disadvantages of concrete, fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag or geopolymer composite is environmentally friendly because it can be produced using industrial byproducts [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. It also has high ductility, of over 3%, under a tensile load. In particular, unlike fly ash-based geopolymers, alkali-activated slag-based binding materials have been shown to develop strength even without high-temperature curing [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Previous studies have also reported that electric arc furnace slag can be used as a recycled aggregate [18][19][20]. They investigated experimentally the structural behavior of full-scale structural members realized with this kind of recycle aggregates as full replacement of natural aggregates.  Figure 1 shows the particle size distribution (PSD) of the GGBS, ZSF, and a mixture of GGBS and ZSF, in which 5% of the total binder was replaced with ZSF. It was measured using a Beckman Coulter LS230 laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Indianapolis, IN, USA). The particle size distribution of the GGBS was very different from that of ZSF. However, the particle size distribution of the GGBS and ZSF mixture was not significantly different from that of the GGBS, because the replacement ratio of GGBS with ZSF was only 5%. A high-range water-reducing agent (HRWRA), a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer, was used to control the viscosity of the paste to ensure uniform distribution of the fiber. A defoamer, a mixture of surface active agents and mineral substances without silicone, was used to prevent the unintended generation of foams in the specimen during the manufacturing process. The PE fiber used as a reinforcing fiber had a length of 18 mm and a diameter of 12 µm, therefore the aspect ratio of the PE fiber was 1500. The tensile strength, elastic modulus and density of the PE fiber were 2700 MPa, 88 GPa, and 0.97 g/cm 3 , respectively. Coulter LS230 laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Indianapolis, IN, USA). The particle size distribution of the GGBS was very different from that of ZSF. However, the particle size distribution of the GGBS and ZSF mixture was not significantly different from that of the GGBS, because the replacement ratio of GGBS with ZSF was only 5%. A high-range water-reducing agent (HRWRA), a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer, was used to control the viscosity of the paste to ensure uniform distribution of the fiber. A defoamer, a mixture of surface active agents and mineral substances without silicone, was used to prevent the unintended generation of foams in the specimen during the manufacturing process. The PE fiber used as a reinforcing fiber had a length of 18 mm and a diameter of 12 μm, therefore the aspect ratio of the PE fiber was 1500. The tensile strength, elastic modulus and density of the PE fiber were 2700 MPa, 88 GPa, and 0.97 g/cm 3 , respectively.  Table 2 shows the mixture proportions used in the present study. The mixtures were designed to investigate how ZSF affected the composite properties of the alkali-activated slag-based composite. In all the mixtures, the weight ratios of calcium hydroxide and sodium sulfate were respectively 8.4% and 3.4% of the weight of the GGBS. The reference mixture was W21-S0, which had a water-binding material ratio of 21%. The W21-S5 mixture was prepared by replacing 5% of the binding materials of the reference mixture with ZSF. The W25-S5 and W30-S5 mixtures were prepared to investigate the effect of water-to-binder ratio on mixtures with ZSF.   Table 2 shows the mixture proportions used in the present study. The mixtures were designed to investigate how ZSF affected the composite properties of the alkali-activated slag-based composite. In all the mixtures, the weight ratios of calcium hydroxide and sodium sulfate were respectively 8.4% and 3.4% of the weight of the GGBS. The reference mixture was W21-S0, which had a water-binding material ratio of 21%. The W21-S5 mixture was prepared by replacing 5% of the binding materials of the reference mixture with ZSF. The W25-S5 and W30-S5 mixtures were prepared to investigate the effect of water-to-binder ratio on mixtures with ZSF.

Specimen Preparation
To prepare the specimens, the GGBS, activators and ZSF, which were powder type materials, were dry-mixed for three min in a planetary mixer. Then, a HRWRA and a defoamer were added with water. The fiber was sequentially mixed in after checking that the paste was homogeneous and had proper viscosity, to ensure the fiber would be homogeneously dispersed. After adding the fiber, the mixtures were mixed for 5 min until the fiber was homogenously dispersed. Following the mixing process, three 50 mm cube specimens were prepared from each mixture, for compressive strength and density measurements.
Following the Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) recommendation [25], five dumbbell-shaped specimens were prepared with each mixture to conduct the uniaxial tension tests. The gauge length of the tension test specimens was 80 mm, and the cross-sectional area within the gauge length was constant at 30 mm × 13 mm. After preparing the specimens, the specimens were covered with a plastic sheet to prevent water evaporation and cured at room temperature for two days. Then, the specimens were demolded and cured in a curing-water tank at 23 • C ± 3 • C to the age of 28 days.

Test Methods
The unintentional generation of large pores during the specimen preparation process can affect the mechanical properties of the resulting specimens. This possibility was addressed by measuring the density of the specimens. To calculate the density of individual specimens, the weight of the specimen in air and in water were measured and then the density was calculated using Equation (1) [26].
where W A is the weight of specimen in air, W W is the weight of specimen in water, ρ w is the density of water. The compressive strength of specimens from each mixture was measured according to ASTM C109 [27]. The tension test was performed using an electric tension test machine according to the JSCE recommendation [25]. The tensile load was applied by controlled displacement at a rate of 0.1 mm/min, which corresponds to a quasi-static load at a strain rate of 2.08 × 10 −5 1/s [28,29]. The load was measured using a load-cell with a capacity of 20 kN, which was attached to the machine. The deformation within a gauge length of each specimen was measured using two linear variable differential transducers, which were attached to both sides of each specimen.
To investigate cracking patterns, the number of cracks occurring in the gauge length (80 mm) of the specimens was measured using a magnifier after the tension test. The crack spacing was calculated by dividing the number of cracks by the gauge length. It was assumed that all deformation occurred at cracks, because without cracks deformation of the matrix was much smaller than the crack width. For this assumption, the average crack width was calculated by dividing the total deformation in the gauge length when the specimens reached the maximum tensile strength, by the number of cracks.
Scanning electron microscopic (SEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to investigate the morphology and chemical compositions of composites.
The accelerating voltage and the probe current of the SEM and EDS configuration were 20 kV and 71.5 nA, respectively. It is necessary to mention that the SEM/EDS investigation was only performed using the secondary electron imaging mode. Figure 2 shows the measured density and the theoretical density of the mixtures. The theoretical density was calculated using the density of the component materials and their proportion in each mixture. The difference in density was determined to be less than 0.5%, which indicated that unintended pores were not generated during the specimen's manufacture or curing. This confirmed that the properties of the composites were not affected by unintentional large pores. 20 kV and 70 71.5 nA, respectively. It is necessary to mention that the SEM/EDS investigation was only performed using the secondary electron imaging mode. Figure 2 shows the measured density and the theoretical density of the mixtures. The theoretical density was calculated using the density of the component materials and their proportion in each mixture. The difference in density was determined to be less than 0.5%, which indicated that unintended pores were not generated during the specimen's manufacture or curing. This confirmed that the properties of the composites were not affected by unintentional large pores.  Figure 3 shows the compressive strength of each mixture. The maximum coefficient of variation was 6.2%. Replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF increased the compressive strength by 18.8%. This may be because ultra-fine ZSF particles undergo the pozzolanic reaction, and increase packing density, making the microstructure denser. In the mixtures that included ZSF, strength declined as the water-to-binder ratio was increased. The compressive strength of the W30-S5 mixture, prepared by replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF, and with a water-to-binder ratio of 30%, was similar to that of the reference mixture.   Figure 3 shows the compressive strength of each mixture. The maximum coefficient of variation was 6.2%. Replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF increased the compressive strength by 18.8%. This may be because ultra-fine ZSF particles undergo the pozzolanic reaction, and increase packing density, making the microstructure denser. In the mixtures that included ZSF, strength declined as the water-to-binder ratio was increased. The compressive strength of the W30-S5 mixture, prepared by replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF, and with a water-to-binder ratio of 30%, was similar to that of the reference mixture. 20 kV and 70 71.5 nA, respectively. It is necessary to mention that the SEM/EDS investigation was only performed using the secondary electron imaging mode. Figure 2 shows the measured density and the theoretical density of the mixtures. The theoretical density was calculated using the density of the component materials and their proportion in each mixture. The difference in density was determined to be less than 0.5%, which indicated that unintended pores were not generated during the specimen's manufacture or curing. This confirmed that the properties of the composites were not affected by unintentional large pores.  Figure 3 shows the compressive strength of each mixture. The maximum coefficient of variation was 6.2%. Replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF increased the compressive strength by 18.8%. This may be because ultra-fine ZSF particles undergo the pozzolanic reaction, and increase packing density, making the microstructure denser. In the mixtures that included ZSF, strength declined as the water-to-binder ratio was increased. The compressive strength of the W30-S5 mixture, prepared by replacing 5% of the total amount of the binding materials with ZSF, and with a water-to-binder ratio of 30%, was similar to that of the reference mixture.   Figure 4 shows the tensile stress and strain curves of all the specimens. All four mixtures showed strain-hardening behavior. When strain was increased after the first crack was generated, stress significantly increased. A previous study showed that stress was greatly decreased by the occurrence of cracks when a hydrophobic PE fiber was used [30]. However, there was no significant decrease in stress in the mixtures used in the present study when a crack was generated. Figure 4 shows the tensile stress and strain curves of all the specimens. All four mixtures showed strain-hardening behavior. When strain was increased after the first crack was generated, stress significantly increased. A previous study showed that stress was greatly decreased by the occurrence of cracks when a hydrophobic PE fiber was used [30]. However, there was no significant decrease in stress in the mixtures used in the present study when a crack was generated.

Uniaxial Tensile Behavior
Based on the fact that there was little decrease in stress, it can be inferred that the interfacial bond between the fiber and the matrix was high. Figure 5 shows the average tensile stress and strain curves of each mixture, which are expressed using a trilinear model. The W21-S5 mixture, which was prepared by replacing 5% of the binding materials of the reference mixture (W21-S0), exhibited a tensile strength and a tensile strain capacity that were much higher than the reference mixture. The experimental results indicated that the substitution of ZSF can improve both tensile strength and tensile strain capacity. In the mixtures prepared using 5% ZSF substitution, the tensile strength and the tensile strain capacity decreased as the water-to-binder ratio was increased.  Based on the fact that there was little decrease in stress, it can be inferred that the interfacial bond between the fiber and the matrix was high. Figure 5 shows the average tensile stress and strain curves of each mixture, which are expressed using a trilinear model. The W21-S5 mixture, which was prepared by replacing 5% of the binding materials of the reference mixture (W21-S0), exhibited a tensile strength and a tensile strain capacity that were much higher than the reference mixture. The experimental results indicated that the substitution of ZSF can improve both tensile strength and tensile strain capacity. In the mixtures prepared using 5% ZSF substitution, the tensile strength and the tensile strain capacity decreased as the water-to-binder ratio was increased.  Figure 6 shows the first cracking strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity, which represent the tensile performance of the individual mixtures. The first cracking strength means the stress measured at the generation of the first crack in the specimen, defined as the point on the tensile stress and strain curve where the stress is drastically changed [31]. Tensile strength refers to the maximum tensile stress. Tensile strain capacity is defined as the strain corresponding to the tensile strength.
The trend for first cracking strength was similar to the trend observed for compressive strength. However, unlike the results for compressive strength, the first cracking strength of the W30-S5 mixture was smaller than that of the W21-S0 mixture. In all the mixtures, the tensile strength was much higher than the first cracking strength, which means that the mixtures satisfied the strength condition, one of the conditions for multiple cracking [30]. In each mixture, the trend in tensile strength was similar to that of the first cracking strength. The tensile strength of the W21-S5 mixture was found to be 26.5% higher than that of the W21-S0 mixture. This increase was greater than the observed 18.8% increase in compressive strength. That is, the experimental results showed that incorporating ZSF had a greater effect on tensile strength than compressive strength. When the waterto-binder ratio was increased, the tensile strength decreased. The tensile strain capacity was high in all the mixtures. In fact, the tensile strain capacity of the high-ductile composites investigated in the present study was about two times higher on average than the tensile strain capacity (3%) of general high-ductile composites [32,33]. All of the mixtures prepared by incorporating ZSF showed a tensile strain capacity higher than that of the reference mixture.
Overall, the W21-S5 mixture with 5% ZSF showed 18.8% higher compressive strength, 26.5% higher tensile strength, and 13.7% higher tensile strain capacity than the reference mixture. Achieving both high strength and high ductility in one material is highly desirable. The improved performance can benefit structures subjected to extreme loads, such as those from earthquakes and impact loads. These test results confirm that it is possible to improve not only the strength of fiber-reinforced alkaliactivated slag-based composites, but also their ductility, by incorporating the proper amount of ZSF in the composite.  Figure 6 shows the first cracking strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity, which represent the tensile performance of the individual mixtures. The first cracking strength means the stress measured at the generation of the first crack in the specimen, defined as the point on the tensile stress and strain curve where the stress is drastically changed [31]. Tensile strength refers to the maximum tensile stress. Tensile strain capacity is defined as the strain corresponding to the tensile strength.
The trend for first cracking strength was similar to the trend observed for compressive strength. However, unlike the results for compressive strength, the first cracking strength of the W30-S5 mixture was smaller than that of the W21-S0 mixture. In all the mixtures, the tensile strength was much higher than the first cracking strength, which means that the mixtures satisfied the strength condition, one of the conditions for multiple cracking [30]. In each mixture, the trend in tensile strength was similar to that of the first cracking strength. The tensile strength of the W21-S5 mixture was found to be 26.5% higher than that of the W21-S0 mixture. This increase was greater than the observed 18.8% increase in compressive strength. That is, the experimental results showed that incorporating ZSF had a greater effect on tensile strength than compressive strength. When the water-to-binder ratio was increased, the tensile strength decreased. The tensile strain capacity was high in all the mixtures. In fact, the tensile strain capacity of the high-ductile composites investigated in the present study was about two times higher on average than the tensile strain capacity (3%) of general high-ductile composites [32,33]. All of the mixtures prepared by incorporating ZSF showed a tensile strain capacity higher than that of the reference mixture.
Overall, the W21-S5 mixture with 5% ZSF showed 18.8% higher compressive strength, 26.5% higher tensile strength, and 13.7% higher tensile strain capacity than the reference mixture. Achieving both high strength and high ductility in one material is highly desirable. The improved performance can benefit structures subjected to extreme loads, such as those from earthquakes and impact loads. These test results confirm that it is possible to improve not only the strength of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites, but also their ductility, by incorporating the proper amount of ZSF in the composite.  Figure 7 shows the ratio of tensile strength (ft) to compressive strength (fcu). In normal concrete, the ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength is approximately 10% [34]. By comparison, the ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength found in the composites investigated in the present study was very high.  Figure 7 shows the ratio of tensile strength (f t ) to compressive strength (f cu ). In normal concrete, the ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength is approximately 10% [34]. By comparison, the ratio In ultimate strength design, the tensile strength of concrete is typically not considered, because the tensile strength is much smaller (about 10%) than the compressive strength. The tensile fracture strain at which cracks are generated (about 0.01%) is smaller than the compressive fracture strain rate (about 0.3%), and thus contributes little to load resistance. But a high tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratio means that the tensile behavior can be taken into consideration in the structural design. The tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratio of the mixtures investigated in the present study was more than two times higher than that of normal concrete, and the tensile strain capacity was several hundred times higher than that of normal concrete. Therefore, the mixtures investigated in the present study may contribute to improving the performance of structures.  Figure 8 compares the tensile stress and strain behavior of ultra-high performance concretes (UHPCs) with high-ductility, and the W21-S5 mixture prepared in the present study [30,35,36]. As shown in Figure 8, although the W21-S5 mixture showed a first cracking strength lower than those of the ductile UHPCs, it showed a similar tensile strength and excellent tensile strain capacity. Table 3 quantitatively compares their compressive strength and tensile performance. The compressive strength of the W21-S5 mixture was as low as 37% that of the ductile UHPCs, but the tensile strength was almost similar. Notably, while the tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratios of the ductile UHPCs was about 10%, that of the W21-S5 mixture was 27.6%, which is 2.34 to 3.16 times higher than the ductile UHPCs. The tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture was 1.5 to 2.7 times higher than those of the ductile UHPCs.
Toughness, which indicates the capacity of a material to absorb externally applied energy until the material is broken, can be calculated from the tensile stress and the strain rate curve. The toughness of the W21-S5 mixture was 1.27 to 2.11 times higher than those of the ductile UHPCs. These results demonstrate the excellent tensile performance of the mixtures investigated in the present study, compared with the ductile UHPCs. In ultimate strength design, the tensile strength of concrete is typically not considered, because the tensile strength is much smaller (about 10%) than the compressive strength. The tensile fracture strain at which cracks are generated (about 0.01%) is smaller than the compressive fracture strain rate (about 0.3%), and thus contributes little to load resistance. But a high tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratio means that the tensile behavior can be taken into consideration in the structural design. The tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratio of the mixtures investigated in the present study was more than two times higher than that of normal concrete, and the tensile strain capacity was several hundred times higher than that of normal concrete. Therefore, the mixtures investigated in the present study may contribute to improving the performance of structures. Figure 8 compares the tensile stress and strain behavior of ultra-high performance concretes (UHPCs) with high-ductility, and the W21-S5 mixture prepared in the present study [30,35,36]. As shown in Figure 8, although the W21-S5 mixture showed a first cracking strength lower than those of the ductile UHPCs, it showed a similar tensile strength and excellent tensile strain capacity.    Table 3 quantitatively compares their compressive strength and tensile performance. The compressive strength of the W21-S5 mixture was as low as 37% that of the ductile UHPCs, but the tensile strength was almost similar. Notably, while the tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratios of the ductile UHPCs was about 10%, that of the W21-S5 mixture was 27.6%, which is 2.34 to 3.16 times higher than the ductile UHPCs. The tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture was 1.5 to 2.7 times higher than those of the ductile UHPCs. Toughness, which indicates the capacity of a material to absorb externally applied energy until the material is broken, can be calculated from the tensile stress and the strain rate curve. The toughness of the W21-S5 mixture was 1.27 to 2.11 times higher than those of the ductile UHPCs. These results demonstrate the excellent tensile performance of the mixtures investigated in the present study, compared with the ductile UHPCs. Figure 9 shows the cracking pattern of the mixtures investigated in the present study. Fine multiple cracks were generated in all the mixtures. Figure 10 shows the average number of cracks, the crack spacing, and crack width of the individual mixtures within the gauge length (80 mm), to quantitatively represent the cracking patterns.
It was observed that the number of cracks generated in the mixtures incorporating ZSF was about 30% greater than that of the reference mixture (W21-S0). It was found that the crack spacing and the crack width of the mixtures with ZSF were 23% and 13% smaller than that of reference mixture, respectively. In particular, compared to the reference mixture, the W21-S5 mixture, prepared by replacing 5% of the binding materials with ZSF, showed higher mechanical performance in terms of compressive strength, tensile strength, tensile strain capacity, and toughness, and better durability in terms of cracking patterns.
It is well known that crack width is closely related to the durability of materials and structures: the smaller the crack width, the higher the durability. As described above, the addition of ZSF might have increased the interfacial bond between the fiber and the matrix. When a crack occurs, the stress of the matrix at the crack's surface is zero, and the external force is fully resisted by the bridging force of fibers at the cracks. As the distance from a crack is increased, the stress transferred from the fiber to the matrix is increased, thus increasing the stress applied to the matrix. A new crack is generated when the stress transferred from the fiber to the matrix is greater than the cracking strength of the matrix. At the same time, as the interfacial bond is increased, the distance between an existing crack and a newly generated crack is decreased [36].
Overall, it was determined that adding ZSF to the alkali-activated slag-based composite may improve not only mechanical performance but also durability.  Figure 11 shows SEM images of the W21-S0 specimen and the W21-S5 specimen. As shown in Figure 11, there was no significant difference in the morphology and microstructures of the W21-S0 and the W21-S5 specimens. Next, the chemical compositions of each point shown in Figure 11 were analyzed by EDS, and the results are shown in Figure 12. Positions besides fibers were selected to identify the chemical composition of the matrix, and one position on the fiber was selected to identify the chemical composition of the fiber. A higher amount of silicate was observed in the W21-S5 specimen with added ZSF than the W21-S0 specimen. It seems that the observation of carbon at both positions is due to the fiber. The fiber was damaged during fiber pullout, which may have left a fiber component on the surface of the matrix. Most of the chemical composition of the fiber surface was carbon.  Figure 11 shows SEM images of the W21-S0 specimen and the W21-S5 specimen. As shown in Figure 11, there was no significant difference in the morphology and microstructures of the W21-S0 and the W21-S5 specimens. Next, the chemical compositions of each point shown in Figure 11 were analyzed by EDS, and the results are shown in Figure 12. Positions besides fibers were selected to identify the chemical composition of the matrix, and one position on the fiber was selected to identify the chemical composition of the fiber. A higher amount of silicate was observed in the W21-S5 specimen with added ZSF than the W21-S0 specimen. It seems that the observation of carbon at both positions is due to the fiber. The fiber was damaged during fiber pullout, which may have left a fiber component on the surface of the matrix. Most of the chemical composition of the fiber surface was carbon.

Conclusions
The present study was conducted to experimentally investigate the effect of added ZSF on the mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites. Experiments were performed to evaluate the density, compressive strength and tensile strength of the composite materials. From the experimental test results, it was determined that the strength and tensile strain capacity of a fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composite with a water-to-binder ratio of 21% can be improved by replacing 5% of the binding materials with ZSF. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture, in which 5% of the binding materials was replaced with ZSF, were 18.8%, 26.5% and 13.7% higher than those of the reference mixture (W21-S0), respectively. The W21-S5 mixture exhibited a compressive strength of 53.5 MPa, a

Conclusions
The present study was conducted to experimentally investigate the effect of added ZSF on the mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites. Experiments were performed to evaluate the density, compressive strength and tensile strength of the composite materials. From the experimental test results, it was determined that the strength and tensile strain capacity of a fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composite with a water-to-binder ratio of 21% can be improved by replacing 5% of the binding materials with ZSF. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture, in which 5% of the binding materials was replaced with ZSF, were 18.8%, 26.5% and 13.7% higher than those of the reference mixture (W21-S0), respectively. The W21-S5 mixture exhibited a compressive strength of 53.5 MPa, a

Conclusions
The present study was conducted to experimentally investigate the effect of added ZSF on the mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites. Experiments were performed to evaluate the density, compressive strength and tensile strength of the composite materials. From the experimental test results, it was determined that the strength and tensile strain capacity of a fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composite with a water-to-binder ratio of 21% can be improved by replacing 5% of the binding materials with ZSF. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture, in which 5% of the binding materials was replaced with ZSF, were 18.8%, 26.5% and 13.7% higher than those of the reference mixture (W21-S0), respectively.
The W21-S5 mixture exhibited a compressive strength of 53.5 MPa, a tensile strength of 14.9 MPa, and a tensile strain capacity of 6.1%. Adding ZSF to the fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag-based composites increased the average number of cracks by 30%, and decreased the crack spacing and crack width by 23% and 13%, respectively. In particular, the W21-S5 mixture showed higher mechanical performance and better durability in terms of cracking patterns compared with the reference mixture (W21-S0). The compressive strength of the W21-S5 mixture was approximately 30% lower than that of the ductile UHPCs, but their tensile strength values were similar. While the tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratio of the ductile UHPCs was about 10%, that of the W21-S5 mixture was 27.6%, which was a maximum of 3.16 times higher than the ductile UHPC. The tensile strain capacity of the W21-S5 mixture was 1.5 to 2.7 times higher than the ductile UHPCs.