Experimental Study on the Preparation of Recycled Admixtures by Using Construction and Demolition Waste

The use of construction and demolition waste (CDW) to prepare recycled admixtures is of great significance for the complete resource reutilization of CDW. In this paper, different kinds of CDW were prepared into recycled powder (RP) with a specific particle size (0–45 µm or 0–75 µm). The fineness, water requirement ratio (WRR), fluidity, loss on ignition (LOI), strength activity index (SAI) and compatibility of cement and superplasticizer (CCS) were examined. The above test results were analyzed by advanced analysis tools, such as laser particle size analysis, XRD, XRF, DSC-TGA, SEM, and BET. The properties of different types of RPs varied greatly, which was closely related to the microstructure, particle morphology and chemical composition of the RP. The experimental results showed that all kinds of RPs after grinding had a high fineness and good particle size distribution, and the mineral composition was dominated by SiO2 with the content exceeding 50%. The WRR of various RPs was between 105% and 112%, and the SAI was between 68% and 78%, but the LOI varied greatly. Different types of RPs had a negative impact on the CCS, but the compatibility of cement and naphthalene-based superplasticizer was less affected. The content of recycled brick powder (RBP) in a hybrid recycled powder (HRP) was an important factor. When the content of RBP in HRP exceeded 50%, the HRP could meet the basic performance requirements of fly ash.


Introduction
A series of treatments for construction and demolition waste (CDW) allow it to be reused in a building, which not only helps conserve natural resources but also solves the ever-increasing crisis of CDW disposal. Recycling has social, economic, and environmental benefits and profound significance for the sustainable development of cities [1].
In many countries and regions, recycled aggregate (RA) has been thoroughly and comprehensively researched [2][3][4][5]. For example, China has developed extensive standards for RA [6,7]. However, a influence of the microstructure of RP on the properties and to provide certain a theoretical reference for the practical application of RP in the future.

Preparation Procedures of RP
There were three types of RPs used in the experiment. The first type came from the process of reshaping RA. The raw materials used were Grade-II RA produced by Qingdao LvFan Recycled Building Materials Co. Ltd. (Qingdao, China). The basic performance indexes of RA are shown in Table 1. The preparation process is shown in Figure 1. The instruments used in the experiment were a jaw crusher (Y160L-6, Linyi, China), a sieve machine (ZBSX-92A, Cangzhou, China), an RA reshaping machine (Qingdao, China), and a ball mill (YXQM-2L, Changsha, China, rotating speed: 400 r/min). The second type was RBP, and its raw material was waste clay brick from a construction demolition site in Qingdao, China. The preparation process of RBP is described as follows. First, the waste clay brick was cleaned to remove mortar. Then, the jaw crusher was used to crush the waste clay brick to obtain particles with particle sizes < 5 cm. Finally, RBP meeting the test requirements was prepared by a ball mill. The third type was RMP, and its raw material was a mortar block (age: 16 months, 28-d compressive strength: 5.4 MPa) prepared in the laboratory. The mixing mass ratio is 1:8:0.5 (cement:sand:water). The preparation of the RMP process was the same as RBP.

Preparation Procedures of RP
There were three types of RPs used in the experiment. The first type came from the process of reshaping RA. The raw materials used were Grade-II RA produced by Qingdao LvFan Recycled Building Materials Co. Ltd. (Qingdao, China). The basic performance indexes of RA are shown in Table 1. The preparation process is shown in Figure 1. The instruments used in the experiment were a jaw crusher (Y160L-6, Linyi, China), a sieve machine (ZBSX-92A, Cangzhou, China), an RA reshaping machine (Qingdao, China), and a ball mill (YXQM-2L, Changsha, China, rotating speed: 400 r/min). The second type was RBP, and its raw material was waste clay brick from a construction demolition site in Qingdao, China. The preparation process of RBP is described as follows. First, the waste clay brick was cleaned to remove mortar. Then, the jaw crusher was used to crush the waste clay brick to obtain particles with particle sizes < 5 cm. Finally, RBP meeting the test requirements was prepared by a ball mill. The third type was RMP, and its raw material was a mortar block (age: 16 months, 28-d compressive strength: 5.4 MPa) prepared in the laboratory. The mixing mass ratio is 1:8:0.5 (cement:sand:water). The preparation of the RMP process was the same as RBP.

RP Mixing Proportion Design
To investigate the influence of component changes on HRP properties, different mixing proportion designs of HRP were used in the experiment as shown in Table 2. In recent years, China has been carrying out urbanization construction, and many rural areas have produced a large amount of CDW from masonry structures. This CDW is mainly composed of clay bricks and mortar. In the experiment, the combination of RBP and RMP is to simulate RP prepared from masonry CDW. The combination of RBP and RCP is to simulate RP prepared from brick-concrete structure CDW.

RP Mixing Proportion Design
To investigate the influence of component changes on HRP properties, different mixing proportion designs of HRP were used in the experiment as shown in Table 2. In recent years, China has been carrying out urbanization construction, and many rural areas have produced a large amount of CDW from masonry structures. This CDW is mainly composed of clay bricks and mortar. In the experiment, the combination of RBP and RMP is to simulate RP prepared from masonry CDW. The combination of RBP and RCP is to simulate RP prepared from brick-concrete structure CDW.

LOI Experiment of RP
LOI is an important index for classifying the quality of FA. The method of determining LOI [28] of RP is described below. The sample was dried to a constant weight at 105 ± 5 • C. Then the sample weighed to approximately 1 g (accurate to 0.0001 g), was burned to a constant weight at 950 ± 25 • C. The LOI was determined by the ratio of the weight after burning to constant weight to the weight before burning.

Fluidity and WRR Experiment
The fluidity and WRR can complement each other to evaluate the quality of an admixture. The fluidity test process [29] is shown in Figure 2. The weight proportion of the mortar is cement:RP:sand:water = 0.7:0.3:3:0.5. The instruments used in the experiment had a cement fluidity electric jumping table (MLD-3 type, Cangzhou, China) and cement mortar mixer (JJ-5 type, Wuxi, China). In the WRR experiment [30], the mixing proportion of the mortar was similar to that used in the fluidity test. The WRR of RP was determined by the ratio of the fluidity of mortar mixed with RP and a reference mortar without RP substitution. The water used was tap water. The cement, acquired from SUNNSY Co. Ltd. (Jinan, China), was the ordinary Portland cement, and its basic performance index is listed in Table 3.

LOI Experiment of RP
LOI is an important index for classifying the quality of FA. The method of determining LOI [28] of RP is described below. The sample was dried to a constant weight at 105 ± 5 °C. Then the sample weighed to approximately 1 g (accurate to 0.0001 g), was burned to a constant weight at 950 ± 25 °C. The LOI was determined by the ratio of the weight after burning to constant weight to the weight before burning.

Fluidity and WRR Experiment
The fluidity and WRR can complement each other to evaluate the quality of an admixture. The fluidity test process [29] is shown in Figure 2. The weight proportion of the mortar is cement:RP:sand:water = 0.7:0.3:3:0.5. The instruments used in the experiment had a cement fluidity electric jumping table (MLD-3 type, Cangzhou, China) and cement mortar mixer (JJ-5 type, Wuxi, China). In the WRR experiment [30], the mixing proportion of the mortar was similar to that used in the fluidity test. The WRR of RP was determined by the ratio of the fluidity of mortar mixed with RP and a reference mortar without RP substitution. The water used was tap water. The cement, acquired from SUNNSY Co. Ltd. (Jinan, China), was the ordinary Portland cement, and its basic performance index is listed in Table 3.

SAI Experiment of RP
To investigate the change in the SAI of various RPs, the mixing proportion design shown in Table 4 was used in the experiment. The particle size range of RBPI, RMPI, and RCPI were 0-45 µm and the particle size range of RBPII, RMPII, and RCPII were 0-75 µm in Table 4. The SAI experiment of RP referred to the SAI experiment of FA [30]. The SAI of RP was determined by the ratio of the 28d compressive strength of the mortar mixed with RP that of to the reference mortar without RP substitution.
The mortar was poured into molds with sizes of 40 × 40 × 160 mm 3 for casting forming and under the standard curing room (T = 20 + 2 °C, RH ≥ 95%) maintenance, and the compressive strength of the specimen was measured after 28 days.

SAI Experiment of RP
To investigate the change in the SAI of various RPs, the mixing proportion design shown in Table 4 was used in the experiment. The particle size range of RBPI, RMPI, and RCPI were 0-45 µm and the particle size range of RBPII, RMPII, and RCPII were 0-75 µm in Table 4. The SAI experiment of RP referred to the SAI experiment of FA [30]. The SAI of RP was determined by the ratio of the 28-d compressive strength of the mortar mixed with RP that of to the reference mortar without RP substitution.
The mortar was poured into molds with sizes of 40 × 40 × 160 mm 3 for casting forming and under the standard curing room (T = 20 + 2 • C, RH ≥ 95%) maintenance, and the compressive strength of the specimen was measured after 28 days.

Experiment of RP Impact on CCS
CCS is defined as the degree of change in the fluidity of cement paste over time due to the quality of the cement and SPs and the degree of change in SP consumption when the same fluidity is obtained. The saturation point of SPs at which the fluidity of the cement paste was not increased with an increase in the SP content in the cement paste is an important indicator in CCS. The SPs used in the experiment were naphthalene-based SPs (NS) and polycarboxylate-based SPs (PCS). The specific properties are shown in Table 5. The weight proportion of cement paste is water:cement:RP = 0.29:0.7:0.3. The specific steps of the experiment [31] are shown in Figure 3.
To facilitate a discussion of the fluidity loss of cement paste mixed with RP over time, the loss rate of fluidity over time (LRFT) is introduced here, and the formula is as follows (1): In the formula: FL: LRFT, expressed as a percentage (%); T in : initial fluidity (mm); T n : n hours fluidity (mm).
The result is expressed to a single decimal place.   Figure 4 shows that the fineness of various RPs is are linearly correlated with the grinding time. Under laboratory conditions, RP with a fineness (45 µm sieve) of 0% can be obtained by ball milling. This indicates that a good fineness of RP can be obtained by mechanical grinding. In addition, the grinding energy consumption of different kinds of RPs is different, which provides guidance for selecting a grinding system. If raw materials are sorted when RP is prepared, the grinding system may be single. If it is not sorted, it is necessary to use a high-efficiency screen in closed-circuit grinding to reduce energy consumption.

Fineness and Particle Size Distribution Analysis
The particle size distribution of an admixture can reflect its gradation. Figure 5 shows the results of the laser particle size analysis of various RPs (Rise-2006 type, Jinan, China). Figure 5 shows that each type of RP has a particle size distribution similar to Grade-II FA, indicating that various RPs have a good particle size distribution. The particle size distributions of various RPIs with a fineness of 0% (45 µm screen) show that the particle size distribution of various RPIs becomes wider, and the differential distribution peak shifts to the left, which demonstrates that the RP gradation is improved [32]. Therefore, mechanical grinding can improve the gradation of RP.   Figure 4 shows that the fineness of various RPs is are linearly correlated with the grinding time. Under laboratory conditions, RP with a fineness (45 µm sieve) of 0% can be obtained by ball milling. This indicates that a good fineness of RP can be obtained by mechanical grinding. In addition, the grinding energy consumption of different kinds of RPs is different, which provides guidance for selecting a grinding system. If raw materials are sorted when RP is prepared, the grinding system may be single. If it is not sorted, it is necessary to use a high-efficiency screen in closed-circuit grinding to reduce energy consumption.   Figure 4 shows that the fineness of various RPs is are linearly correlated with the grinding time. Under laboratory conditions, RP with a fineness (45 µm sieve) of 0% can be obtained by ball milling. This indicates that a good fineness of RP can be obtained by mechanical grinding. In addition, the grinding energy consumption of different kinds of RPs is different, which provides guidance for selecting a grinding system. If raw materials are sorted when RP is prepared, the grinding system may be single. If it is not sorted, it is necessary to use a high-efficiency screen in closed-circuit grinding to reduce energy consumption.

Fineness and Particle Size Distribution Analysis
The particle size distribution of an admixture can reflect its gradation. Figure 5 shows the results of the laser particle size analysis of various RPs (Rise-2006 type, Jinan, China). Figure 5 shows that each type of RP has a particle size distribution similar to Grade-II FA, indicating that various RPs have a good particle size distribution. The particle size distributions of various RPIs with a fineness of 0% (45 µm screen) show that the particle size distribution of various RPIs becomes wider, and the differential distribution peak shifts to the left, which demonstrates that the RP gradation is improved [32]. Therefore, mechanical grinding can improve the gradation of RP.  The particle size distribution of an admixture can reflect its gradation. Figure 5 shows the results of the laser particle size analysis of various RPs (Rise-2006 type, Jinan, China). Figure 5 shows that each type of RP has a particle size distribution similar to Grade-II FA, indicating that various RPs have a good particle size distribution. The particle size distributions of various RPIs with a fineness of 0% (45 µm screen) show that the particle size distribution of various RPIs becomes wider, and the differential distribution peak shifts to the left, which demonstrates that the RP gradation is improved [32]. Therefore, mechanical grinding can improve the gradation of RP.

Chemical and Mineral Compositions
X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, XRF-1800 type, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and Xray powder diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance type, Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany) were used to determine the chemical and mineral compositions of various RPs. Table 6 shows that the SiO2 content of the various RPs is close to that of FA, and the contents of CaO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 are between those of the cement and fly ash, indicating that RP has a good oxide distribution. Figure 6 shows what kinds of RPs contain SiO2 crystal peaks. It has been reported that fine SiO2 can improve the compactness and mechanical strength of concrete [33]. In addition, the crystal peak of albite that is mostly found in granite is found in the XRD pattern of RCP, so the SiO2 in RCP originated mostly from aggregate debris. RCP also contains CaCO3 (calcite), which can shorten the induction period of C3S and partially participate in the hydration process of C3S [34,35]. However, the crystal diffraction peaks of calcium silicate and calcium aluminate are not found in the XRD patterns of RCP and RMP, indicating that the cement particles in RCP and RMP have been basically hydrated and mainly exist in the form of a gel, as shown in the red area in Figure 7. In the XRD pattern of RBP, only the crystal peak of SiO2 is obvious, indicating that the main mineral composition of RBP is SiO2.

Chemical and Mineral Compositions
X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, XRF-1800 type, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance type, Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany) were used to determine the chemical and mineral compositions of various RPs. Table 6 shows that the SiO 2 content of the various RPs is close to that of FA, and the contents of CaO, Al 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 are between those of the cement and fly ash, indicating that RP has a good oxide distribution. Figure 6 shows what kinds of RPs contain SiO 2 crystal peaks. It has been reported that fine SiO 2 can improve the compactness and mechanical strength of concrete [33]. In addition, the crystal peak of albite that is mostly found in granite is found in the XRD pattern of RCP, so the SiO 2 in RCP originated mostly from aggregate debris. RCP also contains CaCO 3 (calcite), which can shorten the induction period of C 3 S and partially participate in the hydration process of C 3 S [34,35]. However, the crystal diffraction peaks of calcium silicate and calcium aluminate are not found in the XRD patterns of RCP and RMP, indicating that the cement particles in RCP and RMP have been basically hydrated and mainly exist in the form of a gel, as shown in the red area in Figure 7. In the XRD pattern of RBP, only the crystal peak of SiO 2 is obvious, indicating that the main mineral composition of RBP is SiO 2 .

Chemical and Mineral Compositions
X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, XRF-1800 type, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and Xray powder diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance type, Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany) were used to determine the chemical and mineral compositions of various RPs. Table 6 shows that the SiO2 content of the various RPs is close to that of FA, and the contents of CaO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 are between those of the cement and fly ash, indicating that RP has a good oxide distribution. Figure 6 shows what kinds of RPs contain SiO2 crystal peaks. It has been reported that fine SiO2 can improve the compactness and mechanical strength of concrete [33]. In addition, the crystal peak of albite that is mostly found in granite is found in the XRD pattern of RCP, so the SiO2 in RCP originated mostly from aggregate debris. RCP also contains CaCO3 (calcite), which can shorten the induction period of C3S and partially participate in the hydration process of C3S [34,35]. However, the crystal diffraction peaks of calcium silicate and calcium aluminate are not found in the XRD patterns of RCP and RMP, indicating that the cement particles in RCP and RMP have been basically hydrated and mainly exist in the form of a gel, as shown in the red area in Figure 7. In the XRD pattern of RBP, only the crystal peak of SiO2 is obvious, indicating that the main mineral composition of RBP is SiO2.    Figure 8 shows that the LOI of RBP is the smallest, approximately 2%, followed by RMP and RCP at approximately 6% and 12%, respectively. However, the LOI of various RPs of the same kind with different fineness differs very little, within approximately 1%, which is different from FA. In addition, the LOI of HRP linearly decreases as the content of RBP in HRP increases. Figure 9 shows the DSC-TGA (SDT Q600 type, TA Instruments, USA) analysis results of various RPs. To clarify the test results, the deriv.weight curve was used to express the test results. Figure 10 shows that the deriv.weight curve of the RCP decreases steadily before 700 °C. Combined with the analysis results of the chemical and mineral components, it can be determined that the weight loss of RCP before 700 °C was caused by the thermal decomposition of gels in the RCP [15,36]. Between 700 °C and 800 °C, CaCO3 (calcite) in RCP is thermally decomposed to release CO2. This part of the weight loss accounts for approximately 31% of the total weight loss of RCP. Therefore, the LOI of RCP is mainly due to the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite. Calcite in RMP is thermally decomposed between 700 °C and 750 °C, accounting for approximately 11% of the total weight loss of RMP. Under 700 °C, it is similar to RCP, in which the gel is heated and dehydrated. Although the deriv.weight curve of RBP has some peaks, the overall weight loss is stable. In summary, RMP and RCP have a large LOI, which is mainly caused by the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite in the powder, while RBP is a powder with a smaller LOI.    Figure 8 shows that the LOI of RBP is the smallest, approximately 2%, followed by RMP and RCP at approximately 6% and 12%, respectively. However, the LOI of various RPs of the same kind with different fineness differs very little, within approximately 1%, which is different from FA. In addition, the LOI of HRP linearly decreases as the content of RBP in HRP increases.  Figure 8 shows that the LOI of RBP is the smallest, approximately 2%, followed by RMP and RCP at approximately 6% and 12%, respectively. However, the LOI of various RPs of the same kind with different fineness differs very little, within approximately 1%, which is different from FA. In addition, the LOI of HRP linearly decreases as the content of RBP in HRP increases. Figure 9 shows the DSC-TGA (SDT Q600 type, TA Instruments, USA) analysis results of various RPs. To clarify the test results, the deriv.weight curve was used to express the test results. Figure 10 shows that the deriv.weight curve of the RCP decreases steadily before 700 °C. Combined with the analysis results of the chemical and mineral components, it can be determined that the weight loss of RCP before 700 °C was caused by the thermal decomposition of gels in the RCP [15,36]. Between 700 °C and 800 °C, CaCO3 (calcite) in RCP is thermally decomposed to release CO2. This part of the weight loss accounts for approximately 31% of the total weight loss of RCP. Therefore, the LOI of RCP is mainly due to the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite. Calcite in RMP is thermally decomposed between 700 °C and 750 °C, accounting for approximately 11% of the total weight loss of RMP. Under 700 °C, it is similar to RCP, in which the gel is heated and dehydrated. Although the deriv.weight curve of RBP has some peaks, the overall weight loss is stable. In summary, RMP and RCP have a large LOI, which is mainly caused by the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite in the powder, while RBP is a powder with a smaller LOI.    Figure 9 shows the DSC-TGA (SDT Q600 type, TA Instruments, USA) analysis results of various RPs. To clarify the test results, the deriv.weight curve was used to express the test results. Figure 10 shows that the deriv.weight curve of the RCP decreases steadily before 700 • C. Combined with the analysis results of the chemical and mineral components, it can be determined that the weight loss of RCP before 700 • C was caused by the thermal decomposition of gels in the RCP [15,36]. Between 700 • C and 800 • C, CaCO 3 (calcite) in RCP is thermally decomposed to release CO 2 . This part of the weight loss accounts for approximately 31% of the total weight loss of RCP. Therefore, the LOI of RCP is mainly due to the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite. Calcite in RMP is thermally decomposed between 700 • C and 750 • C, accounting for approximately 11% of the total weight loss of RMP. Under 700 • C, it is similar to RCP, in which the gel is heated and dehydrated. Although the deriv.weight curve of RBP has some peaks, the overall weight loss is stable. In summary, RMP and RCP have a large LOI, which is mainly caused by the thermal decomposition of gels and calcite in the powder, while RBP is a powder with a smaller LOI.    Figure 10 displays the test results of the WRR of various types of RPs. Figure 10 shows that RBP has a minimum WRR of approximately 105%, followed by RMP and RCP at approximately 107% and 111%, respectively. However, the WRR of various RPs is higher than that of Grade-II FA (fineness of 26%).

Fluidity and WRR
In view of the fact that RP contains a certain amount of gels, the specific surface area of RP was determined by the nitrogen adsorption method instead of the air permeability method. The nitrogen adsorption method is more suitable to determine the internal and external through-hole area of porous materials than the air permeability method [37]. In the experiments, a specific surface area tester (ASAP 2000 type, Micromeritics Instruments Co. Ltd., Atlanta, USA) and electron microscopy (JSM-7500F type, JEOL Co. Ltd., Japan) were used to measure various RPs. Figure 11 shows that the specific surface areas of different types of RPs vary greatly, and this difference mainly comes from the number of gels in RP. It has been reported in research that gel has a large specific surface area between 100,000 and 700,000 kg/m 3 [38]. The large difference in the specific surface area results in different WRRs for different types of RPs. In addition, as the fineness of RP decreases, the specific surface area of RP increases, which explains the increase in WRR of RPI. The microscopic morphology of various RP particles shows that the particle shape of RPII is irregular with polygonal corners and notches, and many fine particles are attached to the surfaces of large particles, as indicated by the red area in Figure 12. In Figure 12, the green area shows that the particle morphology of RPI is obviously improved, the number of corners is reduced, and the shape is gradually changed from an irregular shape to a spheroidal shape. Moreover, the number of fine particles in the RP increases, as shown in the yellow area of Figure 12, and the gradation of the RP is optimized which explains the phenomenon that the difference between the WRR of RPI and RPII is very small. However, the particle morphology of both RPI and RPII is different from that of FA particles. The particles of fly ash are spherical with smooth surfaces, which can reduce water consumption in concrete [39,40]. The RP particles are mostly irregular polygons, so the WRR of RP is higher than that of FA with same fineness.  Figure 10 displays the test results of the WRR of various types of RPs. Figure 10 shows that RBP has a minimum WRR of approximately 105%, followed by RMP and RCP at approximately 107% and 111%, respectively. However, the WRR of various RPs is higher than that of Grade-II FA (fineness of 26%).

Fluidity and WRR
In view of the fact that RP contains a certain amount of gels, the specific surface area of RP was determined by the nitrogen adsorption method instead of the air permeability method. The nitrogen adsorption method is more suitable to determine the internal and external through-hole area of porous materials than the air permeability method [37]. In the experiments, a specific surface area tester (ASAP 2000 type, Micromeritics Instruments Co. Ltd., Atlanta, USA) and electron microscopy (JSM-7500F type, JEOL Co. Ltd., Japan) were used to measure various RPs. Figure 11 shows that the specific surface areas of different types of RPs vary greatly, and this difference mainly comes from the number of gels in RP. It has been reported in research that gel has a large specific surface area between 100,000 and 700,000 kg/m 3 [38]. The large difference in the specific surface area results in different WRRs for different types of RPs. In addition, as the fineness of RP decreases, the specific surface area of RP increases, which explains the increase in WRR of RPI. The microscopic morphology of various RP particles shows that the particle shape of RPII is irregular with polygonal corners and notches, and many fine particles are attached to the surfaces of large particles, as indicated by the red area in Figure 12. In Figure 12, the green area shows that the particle morphology of RPI is obviously improved, the number of corners is reduced, and the shape is gradually changed from an irregular shape to a spheroidal shape. Moreover, the number of fine particles in the RP increases, as shown in the yellow area of Figure 12, and the gradation of the RP is optimized which explains the phenomenon that the difference between the WRR of RPI and RPII is very small. However, the particle morphology of both RPI and RPII is different from that of FA particles. The particles of fly ash are spherical with smooth surfaces, which can reduce water consumption in concrete [39,40]. The RP particles are mostly irregular polygons, so the WRR of RP is higher than that of FA with same fineness.       Figure 13 shows that the mortar mixed with RBP has the highest fluidity, followed by the mortars mixed with RMP and RCP. The fluidity of the mortar mixed with HRP increases as the content of RBP in HRP increases. When the RBP content in HRP exceeds 50%, the fluidity is between Grade-II and III FA. The same kind of RP has little effect on the fluidity of mortar. The results of the RP fluidity test are consistent with the WRR test of RP.

SAI of RP
The SAI is an important index to measure the activity and quality of an admixture. To eliminate the activation energy brought by pulverization, all RPs after pulverization were set aside for a period of time, and then the SAI test was conducted. The SAI and compressive strength test results of various RPs are shown in Figure 14a,b. Figure 14a shows that the SAI of RMP and RCP is between 68% and 72%. The SAI of RBP is better than that of RMP and RCP, and the SAI values of RBPII and RBPI are 74% and 78%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study [41]. Figure 15 shows that, compared with the mortar block mixed with RCP and RMP, the ettringite in the mortar block mixed with RBP is denser, and the pores are smaller, so the compressive strength of the mortar blocks mixed with RBP is higher [22,42]. Meanwhile, Figure 14a also shows that with the increasing   Figure 13 shows that the mortar mixed with RBP has the highest fluidity, followed by the mortars mixed with RMP and RCP. The fluidity of the mortar mixed with HRP increases as the content of RBP in HRP increases. When the RBP content in HRP exceeds 50%, the fluidity is between Grade-II and III FA. The same kind of RP has little effect on the fluidity of mortar. The results of the RP fluidity test are consistent with the WRR test of RP.   Figure 13 shows that the mortar mixed with RBP has the highest fluidity, followed by the mortars mixed with RMP and RCP. The fluidity of the mortar mixed with HRP increases as the content of RBP in HRP increases. When the RBP content in HRP exceeds 50%, the fluidity is between Grade-II and III FA. The same kind of RP has little effect on the fluidity of mortar. The results of the RP fluidity test are consistent with the WRR test of RP.

SAI of RP
The SAI is an important index to measure the activity and quality of an admixture. To eliminate the activation energy brought by pulverization, all RPs after pulverization were set aside for a period of time, and then the SAI test was conducted. The SAI and compressive strength test results of various RPs are shown in Figure 14a,b. Figure 14a shows that the SAI of RMP and RCP is between 68% and 72%. The SAI of RBP is better than that of RMP and RCP, and the SAI values of RBPII and RBPI are 74% and 78%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study [41]. Figure 15 shows that, compared with the mortar block mixed with RCP and RMP, the ettringite in the mortar block mixed with RBP is denser, and the pores are smaller, so the compressive strength of the mortar blocks mixed with RBP is higher [22,42]. Meanwhile, Figure 14a also shows that with the increasing Figure 13. Results of the fluidity of mortar mixed with various RPs.

SAI of RP
The SAI is an important index to measure the activity and quality of an admixture. To eliminate the activation energy brought by pulverization, all RPs after pulverization were set aside for a period of time, and then the SAI test was conducted. The SAI and compressive strength test results of various RPs are shown in Figure 14a,b. Figure 14a shows that the SAI of RMP and RCP is between 68% and 72%. The SAI of RBP is better than that of RMP and RCP, and the SAI values of RBPII and RBPI are 74% and 78%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study [41]. Figure 15 shows that, compared with the mortar block mixed with RCP and RMP, the ettringite in the mortar block mixed with RBP is denser, and the pores are smaller, so the compressive strength of the mortar blocks mixed with RBP is higher [22,42]. Meanwhile, Figure 14a also shows that with the increasing RP fineness, the SAI values of different types of RPs increase. The reason is that as the fineness of RP increases, the number of tiny SiO 2 crystals in the RP gradually increases, as shown in the yellow area in Figure 12. These fine SiO 2 crystals can not only improve the microstructure and density of the mortar but also promote pozzolanic reaction [43,44].
The fitting results of the SAI of HRP show that with the increasing RBP content, the SAI of HRP is continuously increasing. When the RBP content exceeds 50% in HRP, the SAI of HRP is higher than 70%, which can meet the minimum SAI requirements for FA in China.

The Influence of RP on CCS
The CCS experiment mainly measured the saturation point of SPs (NS and PCS) and the fluidity loss of cement paste mixed with RP over time, as shown in Figures 16 and 17, respectively. To better reflect the influence of RP on CCS, the FA group was not added here, but the pure cement group was added. Figure 16a shows that the saturation point of NS (SPNS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.8%, and the SPNS of the cement slurry mixed with RBP is approximately 1%. The SPNS values of the cement paste mixed with RMP and RCP are much higher than that of pure cement paste at approximately 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Figure 16b shows that the saturation point of PCS (SPPCS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.09%, followed by the SPPCS values of cement paste mixed with RBP at approximately 0.12%. The SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RMP is approximately 0.14%, and the maximum SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RCP is approximately 0.18%. Analysis of the above results shows that the RP in cement paste raises the saturation point of NS and PCS, but the effect of RMP and RCP is even more pronounced. There are two reasons for this: First, the particle morphology of RP is poor. When replacing cement as an admixture, this particle morphology will definitely reduce the fluidity of cement paste at the same water-to-binder ratio. Therefore, cement paste mixed with RP will consume more SPs to achieve the same fluidity as pure cement. Second, RP has a high specific surface area. Studies [45] have shown that admixtures with a

The Influence of RP on CCS
The CCS experiment mainly measured the saturation point of SPs (NS and PCS) and the fluidity loss of cement paste mixed with RP over time, as shown in Figures 16 and 17, respectively. To better reflect the influence of RP on CCS, the FA group was not added here, but the pure cement group was added. Figure 16a shows that the saturation point of NS (SPNS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.8%, and the SPNS of the cement slurry mixed with RBP is approximately 1%. The SPNS values of the cement paste mixed with RMP and RCP are much higher than that of pure cement paste at approximately 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Figure 16b shows that the saturation point of PCS (SPPCS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.09%, followed by the SPPCS values of cement paste mixed with RBP at approximately 0.12%. The SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RMP is approximately 0.14%, and the maximum SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RCP is approximately 0.18%. Analysis of the above results shows that the RP in cement paste raises the saturation point of NS and PCS, but the effect of RMP and RCP is even more pronounced. There are two reasons for this: First, the particle morphology of RP is poor. When replacing cement as an admixture, this particle morphology will definitely reduce the fluidity of cement paste at the same water-to-binder ratio. Therefore, cement paste mixed with RP will consume more SPs to achieve the same fluidity as pure cement. Second, RP has a high specific surface area. Studies [45] have shown that admixtures with a high specific surface area can absorb more surface water and SPs, which can reduce the amount of

The Influence of RP on CCS
The CCS experiment mainly measured the saturation point of SPs (NS and PCS) and the fluidity loss of cement paste mixed with RP over time, as shown in Figures 16 and 17, respectively. To better reflect the influence of RP on CCS, the FA group was not added here, but the pure cement group was added. Figure 16a shows that the saturation point of NS (SPNS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.8%, and the SPNS of the cement slurry mixed with RBP is approximately 1%. The SPNS values of the cement paste mixed with RMP and RCP are much higher than that of pure cement paste at approximately 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Figure 16b shows that the saturation point of PCS (SPPCS) in pure cement paste is approximately 0.09%, followed by the SPPCS values of cement paste mixed with RBP at approximately 0.12%. The SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RMP is approximately 0.14%, and the maximum SPPCS of cement paste mixed with RCP is approximately 0.18%. Analysis of the above results shows that the RP in cement paste raises the saturation point of NS and PCS, but the effect of RMP and RCP is even more pronounced. There are two reasons for this: First, the particle morphology of RP is poor. When replacing cement as an admixture, this particle morphology will definitely reduce the fluidity of cement paste at the same water-to-binder ratio. Therefore, cement paste mixed with RP will consume more SPs to achieve the same fluidity as pure cement. Second, RP has a high specific surface area. Studies [45] have shown that admixtures with a high specific surface area can absorb more surface water and SPs, which can reduce the amount of free water and the effective SPs in the liquid phase, reduce the fluidity of the paste. Therefore, the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RCP > the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RMP > the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RBP > the fluidity of cement paste. The LRFT is an important index to describe the CCS. The interaction between SPs and binder particles (such as silica fume or fly ash) may be affected, which means that the compatibility between mineral addition needs to be studied [46]. Figure 17a is the columnar accumulation diagram of the LRFT of the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RP. The experimental selection point is the saturation point of NS and PCS in cement paste. A three-dimensional diagram is selected here for expression, as shown in Figure 17b, so that the change in the test results is clearer. Figure 17a shows that various RPs in cement paste have a negative influence on 1 and 2 h LRFT. The LRFT (PSC) is affected more than the LRFT (NS) as shown in Figure 17b. In addition, RBP in cement paste has less influence on LRFT than RMP and RCP. There are two reasons for this: First, the work of SPs in cement paste is a continuous process. RCP and RMP have a large specific surface area and thus continuously adsorb SPs and water in the liquid phase over time, resulting in a decrease in the available SPs and water content in the system. Thus, the fluidity of the cement paste mixed with RP is continuously reduced. Second, compared with NS, PCS has the advantage of smaller doses amount, reducing water consumption, maintaining fluidity and decreasing concrete shrinkage of concrete [47], but PCS is very sensitive to changes in the cementing material [48]. Due to the high efficiency and sensitivity of PCS, the PCS content in the liquid phase is reduced faster than NS under the same adsorption conditions in cement paste, resulting in the LRFT being more significant.

Conclusion
Based on the chemical composition and microstructure of RP, its fineness, particle size distribution, LOI, WRR, SAI, and the effect of CCS were studied, and the following results and conclusions were obtained. The LRFT is an important index to describe the CCS. The interaction between SPs and binder particles (such as silica fume or fly ash) may be affected, which means that the compatibility between mineral addition needs to be studied [46]. Figure 17a is the columnar accumulation diagram of the LRFT of the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RP. The experimental selection point is the saturation point of NS and PCS in cement paste. A three-dimensional diagram is selected here for expression, as shown in Figure 17b, so that the change in the test results is clearer. Figure 17a shows that various RPs in cement paste have a negative influence on 1 and 2 h LRFT. The LRFT (PSC) is affected more than the LRFT (NS) as shown in Figure 17b. In addition, RBP in cement paste has less influence on LRFT than RMP and RCP. There are two reasons for this: First, the work of SPs in cement paste is a continuous process. RCP and RMP have a large specific surface area and thus continuously adsorb SPs and water in the liquid phase over time, resulting in a decrease in the available SPs and water content in the system. Thus, the fluidity of the cement paste mixed with RP is continuously reduced. Second, compared with NS, PCS has the advantage of smaller doses amount, reducing water consumption, maintaining fluidity and decreasing concrete shrinkage of concrete [47], but PCS is very sensitive to changes in the cementing material [48]. Due to the high efficiency and sensitivity of PCS, the PCS content in the liquid phase is reduced faster than NS under the same adsorption conditions in cement paste, resulting in the LRFT being more significant. The LRFT is an important index to describe the CCS. The interaction between SPs and binder particles (such as silica fume or fly ash) may be affected, which means that the compatibility between mineral addition needs to be studied [46]. Figure 17a is the columnar accumulation diagram of the LRFT of the fluidity of cement paste mixed with RP. The experimental selection point is the saturation point of NS and PCS in cement paste. A three-dimensional diagram is selected here for expression, as shown in Figure 17b, so that the change in the test results is clearer. Figure 17a shows that various RPs in cement paste have a negative influence on 1 and 2 h LRFT. The LRFT (PSC) is affected more than the LRFT (NS) as shown in Figure 17b. In addition, RBP in cement paste has less influence on LRFT than RMP and RCP. There are two reasons for this: First, the work of SPs in cement paste is a continuous process. RCP and RMP have a large specific surface area and thus continuously adsorb SPs and water in the liquid phase over time, resulting in a decrease in the available SPs and water content in the system. Thus, the fluidity of the cement paste mixed with RP is continuously reduced. Second, compared with NS, PCS has the advantage of smaller doses amount, reducing water consumption, maintaining fluidity and decreasing concrete shrinkage of concrete [47], but PCS is very sensitive to changes in the cementing material [48]. Due to the high efficiency and sensitivity of PCS, the PCS content in the liquid phase is reduced faster than NS under the same adsorption conditions in cement paste, resulting in the LRFT being more significant.

Conclusion
Based on the chemical composition and microstructure of RP, its fineness, particle size distribution, LOI, WRR, SAI, and the effect of CCS were studied, and the following results and conclusions were obtained.