Application of Plasma Treatment in Preparation of Soybean Oil Factory Sludge Catalyst and Its Application in Selective Catalytic Oxidation (SCO) Denitration

At present, the most commonly used denitration process is the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) method. However, in the SCR method, the service life of the catalyst is short, and the industrial operation cost is high. The selective catalytic oxidation absorption (SCO) method can be used in a low temperature environment, which greatly reduces energy consumption and cost. The C/N ratio of the sludge produced in the wastewater treatment process of the soybean oil plant used in this paper is 9.64, while the C/N ratio of the sludge produced by an urban sewage treatment plant is 10–20. This study shows that the smaller the C/N ratio, the better the denitration efficiency of the catalyst. Therefore, dried oil sludge is used as a catalyst carrier. The influence of different activation times, and LiOH concentrations, on catalyst activity were investigated in this paper. The denitration performance of catalysts prepared by different activation sequences was compared. The catalyst was characterized by Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The experimental results showed that: (1) When the concentration of the LiOH solution used for activation is 15%, and the activation time is four hours, the denitration effect of the catalyst is the best; (2) the catalyst prepared by activation before plasma roasting has the best catalytic activity.


Introduction
At present, the flue gas removal NO x technology that has been studied and applied can be roughly classified into two types: dry flue gas denitration, and wet flue gas denitration. The main methods of dry flue gas denitration are solid adsorption, plasma activation, selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) [1,2]. Wet flue gas denitration mainly includes the acid absorption method, alkali neutralization absorption method, and the selective catalytic oxidation absorption method (SCO). At present, the most commonly used SCR method to remove NO x from the flue gas is to reduce NO to N 2 using NH 3 as the reducing agent, but the requirement for catalyst is very high. The catalyst in SCR requires a high temperature to produce a good catalytic effect. Therefore, in order to meet the temperature demand of the catalyst, the SCR reactor must be placed in a high temperature area. This makes the catalyst more susceptible to erosion and poisoning from the corrosive substances in high-concentration soot, thereby reducing the service life of the catalyst, and states under low temperature conditions. This will lead to better low temperature catalytic activity of manganese in the SCO reaction [20][21][22][23].
The conventional preparation method of the catalyst is the impregnation method. This method must adopt high temperature roasting, where the roasting temperature is generally above 400 • C. The dried sludge is often ignited during this high-temperature roasting process, so the dried sludge must be roasted in the absence of oxygen. In addition, the roasting process is often difficult to control. This makes the prepared catalyst particularly easy to agglomerate, and makes the distribution of active components in the catalyst non-uniform. Based on the above problems, a low-temperature plasma roasting method was used to prepare the sludge catalyst. A large number of studies have shown that after plasma treatment, the surface of the catalyst becomes rough due to etching. In addition, the distribution of the surface active components of the catalyst have an important influence on the catalytic activity. Many researchers have found that plasma affects certain specific structures of the catalyst [24,25]. For example, plasma roasting increases the number of active sites of the catalyst. In addition, plasma roasting enhances the strong interaction between the supported catalyst metal and the catalyst support, forming a special metal-support interface. This will increase the electron transfer efficiency between the semiconductor and the metal, and will give the catalyst a very high catalytic activity. Finally, plasma roasting produces new functional groups on the catalyst surface [26].
In this paper, low temperature plasma roasting is used instead of muffle furnace roasting. The energy of the particles in the low-temperature plasma is generally several to several tens of electron volts, and after the reaction of the material, the chemical bonds of the molecules on the surface of the material can be broken to form a new bond. This will increase the chemical reactivity of the particles, and combine them with free radicals, such as oxygen and nitrogen, in the discharge space. This process creates oxygen and nitrogen containing functional groups on the surface of the material. Studies have shown that the following physicochemical changes may occur after the plasma acts on the surface of the material. Firstly, the active particles strike the surface of the material. This process causes the chemical bonds between the surface molecules to open, generating macromolecular radicals, which cause activity on the surface of the material. Secondly, the plasma etches the surface of the material. The high-energy particles strike the surface of the material to cause physical etching, and the active particles chemically react with the surface of the material to generate chemical erosion.
Therefore, by combining the advantages of the above plasma treatment methods, the physical and chemical properties of the catalyst are greatly optimized, after being treated in low-temperature plasma. Carriers carrying active ingredients, such as metals, are directly placed in a plasma reactor for reduction or oxidation. This treatment method can not only maintain the catalyst skeleton, remove organic impurities such as template, and prevent the sintering of metal clusters from becoming large, but also has a relatively short processing time compared to conventional roasting. Many experiments have shown that this plasma roasting can replace conventional high-temperature roasting [27][28][29].

Materials
The experimental raw material for this study was dried oil sludge from the Xi'an Bangqi Oil Technology Company Wastewater Treatment Station (Xi'an, China), and the results of elemental analysis, and ICP analysis, of the raw materials are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Catalyst Pretreatment
The surface of strong alkali-activated sludge still contains a large amount of organic matter. When plasma is used to roast the catalyst, the organic matter on the surface of the sludge is consumed first. This makes it impossible for the manganese salt loaded on the surface of the sludge catalyst, to be completely oxidized to manganese oxide. Therefore, before the manganese salt is loaded, the raw sludge is first roasted in a muffle furnace so as to consume most of the organic matter on the surface of the sludge. Studies have shown that the sludge catalyst has better denitration performance after being roasted at 450 • C for 1 h in a muffle furnace. Therefore, before the sludge catalyst is loaded with manganese salt, the muffle furnace is used to roast the raw sludge at 450 • C for 1 h, to consume most of the organic matter on the sludge surface.

Catalyst Preparation
The sludge is air-dried first and then crushed into fine particles. A certain quantity of sludge particles (particle size of 2 mm) were selected for use, placed in a muffle furnace (Shanghai Shiyan Electric Furnace Factory, Shanghai, China), and roasted at a temperature of 450 • C for 1 h. Then different concentrations of LiOH activator (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%) were used, and different activation times (2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h) chosen, to prepare modified sludge catalyst. The optimum activation conditions are selected by the catalyst evaluation device.
The sludge obtained from roasting at 450 • C for 1 h in the muffle furnace was selected. After that, the roasted sludge is subjected to LiOH activation under the above selected optimum activation conditions. Subsequently, the manganese salt is loaded on the catalyst using the equal volume impregnation method. Finally, the catalyst loaded with manganese salt was placed in plasma (Suman Plasma Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) and roasted. The roasting power was 90 watts, and the roasting time was 9 min. A molded sludge denitration catalyst that loads 2% manganese oxide was prepared (The AP catalyst was used to replace the catalyst prepared by plasma roasting after LiOH activation).
The sludge catalyst obtained from roasting at 450 • C for 1 h in the muffle furnace is selected. After that, manganese salt was loaded onto the catalyst using the equal volume impregnation method. Subsequently, the catalyst loaded with manganese salt was placed in plasma and roasted. The roasting power was 90 watts, and the roasting time was 9 min. Finally, the sludge catalyst is subjected to LiOH activation under the above selected optimum activation conditions. A molded sludge denitration catalyst that loads 2% manganese oxide was prepared (The PA catalyst was used to replace the catalyst prepared by LIOH activation after plasma roasting). Figure 1 is a process diagram of a catalyst activity evaluation experiment. Catalyst activity evaluation means that the catalysts obtained by different preparation methods are evaluated through a flue gas simulation device. First, the total gas flow rate into the device was set to 1000 mL/min, the NO flow rate was set to 20 mL/min, the O 2 flow rate was set to 60 mL/min, and the N 2 flow rate was set to 920 mL/min. The three gases are then passed into a mixing tank for mixing. Subsequently, the mixed gas is passed to a reaction tower equipped with catalyst to carry out the denitration reaction. Finally, the catalyzed gas is passed into the gas cylinder. The gas is detected using the flue gas analyzer, and the remaining gas is discharged. In this experiment, the NO concentration was measured using the Flue gas analyzer (Testo340, Mingle Instrument, Guangzhou, China). The Flue gas analyzer is a custom instrument with NO and O 2 modules. It can detect NO and O 2 . The amount of catalyst in the reaction is 3 g, the catalyst can build up a 2 cm high reaction layer, and it can make a good contact with simulated flue gas and catalyst. The Set temperature of the reaction tower is 150 • C. The NO conversion ratio is calculated as follows: The initial NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration A) passed into the reaction system is obtained using the flow meter, and then the NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration B) after the catalytic reaction, is obtained using the flue gas analyzer. A-B/A is the NO conversion ratio.

Catalyst Evaluation Device
The sludge was activated for 2 h using 5% LiOH, 10% LiOH, 15% LiOH, and 20% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 2. The sludge was activated for 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h, using a concentration of 15% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 3.  The NO conversion ratio is calculated as follows: The initial NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration A) passed into the reaction system is obtained using the flow meter, and then the NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration B) after the catalytic reaction, is obtained using the flue gas analyzer. A-B/A is the NO conversion ratio.
The sludge was activated for 2 h using 5% LiOH, 10% LiOH, 15% LiOH, and 20% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 2. The sludge was activated for 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h, using a concentration of 15% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 3. The NO conversion ratio is calculated as follows: The initial NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration A) passed into the reaction system is obtained using the flow meter, and then the NO concentration of the flue gas (concentration B) after the catalytic reaction, is obtained using the flue gas analyzer. A-B/A is the NO conversion ratio.
The sludge was activated for 2 h using 5% LiOH, 10% LiOH, 15% LiOH, and 20% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 2. The sludge was activated for 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h, using a concentration of 15% LiOH, and then the denitration experiment was performed on the modified sludge. The conversion ratio of NO is shown in Figure 3.

Effects of Different Activation Concentrations on the Denitration Performance of SCO
From Figure 2, it can be seen that the sludge has the best NO removal effect after being activated with 15% LiOH. If the concentration of LiOH is too high or too low, the removal effect of activated sludge on NO will be reduced. Within 2-17 min of the reaction, the NO removal rate of sludge activated with 15% LiOH was significantly higher than that of sludge activated with other concentrations. The reason is that when the LiOH concentration is too low, no effective active sites can be formed on the surface of the sludge, and therefore the NO oxidation reaction is not significant. With the increase of alkali concentration, the active sites for the oxidation reaction gradually increase, which improves the reaction efficiency of NO and O2, and significantly enhances the denitration effect. However, as the concentration of LiOH continues to increase, the activation of sludge by LiOH reaches saturation. Too much alkali will destroy the existing active sites, resulting in obstruction of the oxidation reaction, and reduced denitration efficiency. Therefore, the optimal LiOH activation concentration was 15% [30].

Effect of Different Activation Times on SCO Denitration Performance
As can be seen from Figure 3, the NO removal effect of sludge activated by LiOH for 4 h is the best, and the NO removal effect of sludge activated for 6 h is the worst. Within 10-20 min of the reaction, sludge activated after 4 h had a significantly higher NO removal rate and continuity, than sludge activated after 2 h and 6 h. The reason is that when the alkali activation time is 2 h, the activation time is too short, and LiOH and the sludge cannot fully react. The amount of effective pore structure formed by the sludge is less, so the desired activation effect cannot be achieved, and sufficient active sites cannot be formed. As the activation time increases, the activation efficiency becomes higher and higher, and the degree of activation gradually deepens. As a result, more and more effective pores have been formed, so the denitration effect has gradually increased. However, as the activation time becomes longer, LiOH will destroy the previously formed micro-porous structure. The pores collapse, destroying the original effective pore location. Therefore, the effect of denitration decreased significantly. In summary, the appropriate activation time is particularly advantageous for the activation effect. If the time is too long or too short, proper active sites cannot be formed. Therefore, the optimal activation time for screening LiOH was 4 h [31].

Effects of Different Activation Concentrations on the Denitration Performance of SCO
From Figure 2, it can be seen that the sludge has the best NO removal effect after being activated with 15% LiOH. If the concentration of LiOH is too high or too low, the removal effect of activated sludge on NO will be reduced. Within 2-17 min of the reaction, the NO removal rate of sludge activated with 15% LiOH was significantly higher than that of sludge activated with other concentrations. The reason is that when the LiOH concentration is too low, no effective active sites can be formed on the surface of the sludge, and therefore the NO oxidation reaction is not significant. With the increase of alkali concentration, the active sites for the oxidation reaction gradually increase, which improves the reaction efficiency of NO and O 2 , and significantly enhances the denitration effect. However, as the concentration of LiOH continues to increase, the activation of sludge by LiOH reaches saturation. Too much alkali will destroy the existing active sites, resulting in obstruction of the oxidation reaction, and reduced denitration efficiency. Therefore, the optimal LiOH activation concentration was 15% [30].

Effect of Different Activation Times on SCO Denitration Performance
As can be seen from Figure 3, the NO removal effect of sludge activated by LiOH for 4 h is the best, and the NO removal effect of sludge activated for 6 h is the worst. Within 10-20 min of the reaction, sludge activated after 4 h had a significantly higher NO removal rate and continuity, than sludge activated after 2 h and 6 h. The reason is that when the alkali activation time is 2 h, the activation time is too short, and LiOH and the sludge cannot fully react. The amount of effective pore structure formed by the sludge is less, so the desired activation effect cannot be achieved, and sufficient active sites cannot be formed. As the activation time increases, the activation efficiency becomes higher and higher, and the degree of activation gradually deepens. As a result, more and more effective pores have been formed, so the denitration effect has gradually increased. However, as the activation time becomes longer, LiOH will destroy the previously formed micro-porous structure. The pores collapse, destroying the original effective pore location. Therefore, the effect of denitration decreased significantly. In summary, the appropriate activation time is particularly advantageous for the activation effect. If the time is too long or too short, proper active sites cannot be formed. Therefore, the optimal activation time for screening LiOH was 4 h [31].

Effect of Different Preparation Sequences on Catalytic Activity of Catalysts
As can be seen from Figure 4, the denitration catalyst prepared by plasma roasting after alkaline activation is effective in removing NO. It is obviously better than the catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before alkaline activation. It is also significantly better than the denitration catalyst prepared only by plasma roasting. The catalytic activity of the catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before activation reaches over 85% in the reaction, and is far better than the other two prepared catalysts. The reason is, after the sludge was roasted in a muffle furnace at a temperature of 450 • C for 1 h, the organic matter on its original sludge surface was almost consumed. Subsequently, the sludge was activated with LiOH at a mass concentration of 15% for 4 h. This process can form a large amount of -OH basic functional groups on the surface of the sludge. According to the previous experimental results, with the increase of the number of -OH basic functional groups on the surface of the sludge catalyst, the activity of the sludge denitration catalyst improves in the catalytic oxidation of NO. After the PA catalyst is calcined by the plasma, manganese oxides are formed on the surface of the sludge catalyst. However, after being activated by LiOH, it is washed off with water. This results in a reduction of the manganese oxide on the surface of the final sludge catalyst, and a reduction in the active sites. As a result, the catalytic activity of the catalyst is low [32].

Effect of Different Preparation Sequences on Catalytic Activity of Catalysts
As can be seen from Figure 4, the denitration catalyst prepared by plasma roasting after alkaline activation is effective in removing NO. It is obviously better than the catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before alkaline activation. It is also significantly better than the denitration catalyst prepared only by plasma roasting. The catalytic activity of the catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before activation reaches over 85% in the reaction, and is far better than the other two prepared catalysts. The reason is, after the sludge was roasted in a muffle furnace at a temperature of 450 °C for 1 h, the organic matter on its original sludge surface was almost consumed. Subsequently, the sludge was activated with LiOH at a mass concentration of 15% for 4 h. This process can form a large amount of -OH basic functional groups on the surface of the sludge. According to the previous experimental results, with the increase of the number of -OH basic functional groups on the surface of the sludge catalyst, the activity of the sludge denitration catalyst improves in the catalytic oxidation of NO. After the PA catalyst is calcined by the plasma, manganese oxides are formed on the surface of the sludge catalyst. However, after being activated by LiOH, it is washed off with water. This results in a reduction of the manganese oxide on the surface of the final sludge catalyst, and a reduction in the active sites. As a result, the catalytic activity of the catalyst is low [32].

Infrared Spectrum Analysis
From Figure 5, there is a stretching vibration band of -NO at 874cm -1 , and a stretching vibration band of -NO2 at 1440cm -1 . Both of these groups are from the organic matter in the sludge. The catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before LIOH activation (referred to as PA catalyst) has a weaker stretching vibration of the -OH functional group. Based on this, it can be speculated that this is the oxidation mechanism of SCO. The denitration efficiency of the PA catalyst is low. The reason is that the concentration of basic functional groups on the surface of the catalyst is low, so NO2 cannot be completely adsorbed by the basic functional group. When all the NO adsorption sites are covered by the NO2 formed in the late stage of the reaction, the denitration effect is significantly reduced. The AP catalyst however, has high denitration efficiency. This is due to the high concentration of surface-OH basic functional groups of the sludge catalyst. Therefore, NO2 is easily adsorbed by a basic functional group, thereby releasing a large amount of NO adsorption sites. This process promotes the continuous adsorption of NO on the sludge surface, and the denitration rate is significantly improved [33].

Infrared Spectrum Analysis
From Figure 5, there is a stretching vibration band of -NO at 874cm -1 , and a stretching vibration band of -NO 2 at 1440cm -1 . Both of these groups are from the organic matter in the sludge. The catalyst prepared by plasma roasting before LIOH activation (referred to as PA catalyst) has a weaker stretching vibration of the -OH functional group. Based on this, it can be speculated that this is the oxidation mechanism of SCO. The denitration efficiency of the PA catalyst is low. The reason is that the concentration of basic functional groups on the surface of the catalyst is low, so NO 2 cannot be completely adsorbed by the basic functional group. When all the NO adsorption sites are covered by the NO 2 formed in the late stage of the reaction, the denitration effect is significantly reduced. The AP catalyst however, has high denitration efficiency. This is due to the high concentration of surface-OH basic functional groups of the sludge catalyst. Therefore, NO 2 is easily adsorbed by a basic functional group, thereby releasing a large amount of NO adsorption sites. This process promotes the continuous adsorption of NO on the sludge surface, and the denitration rate is significantly improved [33].

XPS Analysis
From the main spectra of Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the main elements contained in the AP catalyst are oxygen, carbon, and manganese. The manganese is loaded by equal volume impregnation. As can be seen from the Mn spectrum, there are two peaks of manganese metal on the surface of the catalyst. The two peaks are Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2. This shows that there are two manganese oxides with different valences in the catalyst. Among them, the Mn2p3/2 peak, with a binding energy of 640 eV, represents MnO2; and the Mn2p1/2 peak, with a binding energy of 652 eV, represents Mn2O3. As can be seen from the figure, before and after the reaction, the main Mn oxides formed in AP catalyst are MnO2 and Mn2O3. Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that as the reaction proceeds, the amount of Mn 4+ increases, while the amount of Mn 3+ decreases, eventually leading to a decrease in denitration efficiency. It can be concluded that Mn2O3 plays a major role in the reaction. From the spectrum in Figure 6c of the O element, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen is at 529 eV, and the chemisorbed oxygen is at 531 eV. It can be seen that lattice oxygen accounts for a large proportion. It can also be seen that chemisorbed oxygen accounts for a large proportion. Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen and the chemisorbed oxygen are greatly reduced after the reaction. However, the reduction ratio of chemisorbed oxygen is less than the reduction ratio of lattice oxygen. This shows that it is mainly lattice oxygen that plays a role during the reaction [34,35]. (a)

XPS Analysis
From the main spectra of Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the main elements contained in the AP catalyst are oxygen, carbon, and manganese. The manganese is loaded by equal volume impregnation. As can be seen from the Mn spectrum, there are two peaks of manganese metal on the surface of the catalyst. The two peaks are Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2. This shows that there are two manganese oxides with different valences in the catalyst. Among them, the Mn2p3/2 peak, with a binding energy of 640 eV, represents MnO 2 ; and the Mn2p1/2 peak, with a binding energy of 652 eV, represents Mn 2 O 3 . As can be seen from the figure, before and after the reaction, the main Mn oxides formed in AP catalyst are MnO 2 and Mn 2 O 3 . Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that as the reaction proceeds, the amount of Mn 4+ increases, while the amount of Mn 3+ decreases, eventually leading to a decrease in denitration efficiency. It can be concluded that Mn 2 O 3 plays a major role in the reaction. From the spectrum in Figure 6c of the O element, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen is at 529 eV, and the chemisorbed oxygen is at 531 eV. It can be seen that lattice oxygen accounts for a large proportion. It can also be seen that chemisorbed oxygen accounts for a large proportion. Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen and the chemisorbed oxygen are greatly reduced after the reaction. However, the reduction ratio of chemisorbed oxygen is less than the reduction ratio of lattice oxygen. This shows that it is mainly lattice oxygen that plays a role during the reaction [34,35].

XPS Analysis
From the main spectra of Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the main elements contained in the AP catalyst are oxygen, carbon, and manganese. The manganese is loaded by equal volume impregnation. As can be seen from the Mn spectrum, there are two peaks of manganese metal on the surface of the catalyst. The two peaks are Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2. This shows that there are two manganese oxides with different valences in the catalyst. Among them, the Mn2p3/2 peak, with a binding energy of 640 eV, represents MnO2; and the Mn2p1/2 peak, with a binding energy of 652 eV, represents Mn2O3. As can be seen from the figure, before and after the reaction, the main Mn oxides formed in AP catalyst are MnO2 and Mn2O3. Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that as the reaction proceeds, the amount of Mn 4+ increases, while the amount of Mn 3+ decreases, eventually leading to a decrease in denitration efficiency. It can be concluded that Mn2O3 plays a major role in the reaction. From the spectrum in Figure 6c of the O element, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen is at 529 eV, and the chemisorbed oxygen is at 531 eV. It can be seen that lattice oxygen accounts for a large proportion. It can also be seen that chemisorbed oxygen accounts for a large proportion. Comparing Figures 6 and 7, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen and the chemisorbed oxygen are greatly reduced after the reaction. However, the reduction ratio of chemisorbed oxygen is less than the reduction ratio of lattice oxygen. This shows that it is mainly lattice oxygen that plays a role during the reaction [34,35]. From the main spectra of Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that the main elements contained in the PA catalyst are oxygen, carbon, and manganese. The manganese is loaded by equal volume impregnation. As can be seen from the Mn spectrum, there are two peaks of manganese metal on the surface of the catalyst. The two peaks are Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2. This shows that there are two manganese oxides with different valences in the catalyst. Among them, the Mn2p3/2 peak, with a binding energy of 641 eV, represents MnO2; and the Mn2p1/2 peak, with a binding energy of 652 eV, represents Mn2O3. As can be seen from the figure, before and after the reaction, the main Mn oxides formed in AP catalyst are MnO2 and Mn2O3. Comparing Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that as the reaction proceeds, the amount of Mn 4+ increases, while the amount of Mn 3+ decreases, eventually leading to a decrease in denitration efficiency. It can be concluded that Mn2O3 plays a major role in the reaction. From the spectrum in Figure 8c of the O element, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen is at 529 eV, and the chemisorbed oxygen is at 531 eV and 533 eV. It can be seen that lattice oxygen accounts for a large proportion. It can also be seen that chemisorbed oxygen accounts for a large proportion. Comparing Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen and the chemisorbed oxygen are greatly reduced after the reaction. However, the reduction ratio of chemisorbed oxygen is less than the reduction ratio of lattice oxygen. This shows that it is mainly lattice oxygen that plays a role during the reaction [36,37]. From the main spectra of Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that the main elements contained in the PA catalyst are oxygen, carbon, and manganese. The manganese is loaded by equal volume impregnation. As can be seen from the Mn spectrum, there are two peaks of manganese metal on the surface of the catalyst. The two peaks are Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2. This shows that there are two manganese oxides with different valences in the catalyst. Among them, the Mn2p3/2 peak, with a binding energy of 641 eV, represents MnO 2 ; and the Mn2p1/2 peak, with a binding energy of 652 eV, represents Mn 2 O 3 . As can be seen from the figure, before and after the reaction, the main Mn oxides formed in AP catalyst are MnO 2 and Mn 2 O 3 . Comparing Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that as the reaction proceeds, the amount of Mn 4+ increases, while the amount of Mn 3+ decreases, eventually leading to a decrease in denitration efficiency. It can be concluded that Mn 2 O 3 plays a major role in the reaction. From the spectrum in Figure 8c of the O element, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen is at 529 eV, and the chemisorbed oxygen is at 531 eV and 533 eV. It can be seen that lattice oxygen accounts for a large proportion. It can also be seen that chemisorbed oxygen accounts for a large proportion. Comparing  Figures 8 and 9, it can be seen that the lattice oxygen and the chemisorbed oxygen are greatly reduced after the reaction. However, the reduction ratio of chemisorbed oxygen is less than the reduction ratio of lattice oxygen. This shows that it is mainly lattice oxygen that plays a role during the reaction [36,37].

XRD Analysis
From the XRD pattern of the AP catalyst in Figure 10

XRD Analysis
From the XRD pattern of the AP catalyst in Figure 10, it can be seen that the characteristic peaks of the MnO 2 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 20  From the PA catalyst XRD pattern in Figure 11, it can be seen that the characteristic peaks of the MnO2 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 17.78°, 28.83°, 37.73°, 57°, and 70.88°. The characteristic peaks of the Mn2O3 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 25.01°, 33.81°, and 50.85°. It can be concluded that the Mn oxides on the PA catalyst surface are mainly MnO2 and Mn2O3. These indicate that the prepared catalyst surface has a good Mn oxide crystal form. This enables the sludge catalyst to have good catalytic activity for the selective catalytic oxidation of NO [40].

XRD Analysis
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the AP catalyst before and after the reaction was performed, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the PA catalyst before and after the reaction was performed. The magnification was 5000 times. The results are shown in Figure 12. From the PA catalyst XRD pattern in Figure 11, it can be seen that the characteristic peaks of the MnO 2 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 17  From the PA catalyst XRD pattern in Figure 11, it can be seen that the characteristic peaks of the MnO2 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 17.78°, 28.83°, 37.73°, 57°, and 70.88°. The characteristic peaks of the Mn2O3 crystal form appear at the θ angles of 25.01°, 33.81°, and 50.85°. It can be concluded that the Mn oxides on the PA catalyst surface are mainly MnO2 and Mn2O3. These indicate that the prepared catalyst surface has a good Mn oxide crystal form. This enables the sludge catalyst to have good catalytic activity for the selective catalytic oxidation of NO [40].

XRD Analysis
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the AP catalyst before and after the reaction was performed, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the PA catalyst before and after the reaction was performed. The magnification was 5000 times. The results are shown in Figure 12.

XRD Analysis
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the AP catalyst before and after the reaction was performed, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the PA catalyst before and after the reaction was performed. The magnification was 5000 times. The results are shown in Figure 12. From Figure 12a-d, it can be seen that before and after the AP catalyst reaction, there are obvious Mn oxide crystal grains on the surface. However, no significant particulate matter was found on the surface of the PA catalyst before and after the reaction. The number of active sides on the surface of Mn oxides in the PA catalyst is less, resulting in a low NO removal rate for the PA catalyst.

Elemental Analysis
According to Tables 3 and 4, it can be seen that the content of MN in the catalyst increases after the load.

Conclusions
In this paper, oil sludge was used as catalyst carrier, and LiOH was used to modify the carrier. The optimal concentration of modified LiOH catalyst, and the optimal modification time were selected. The effect of modified sludge conditions on the denitration rate was investigated. From Figure 12a-d, it can be seen that before and after the AP catalyst reaction, there are obvious Mn oxide crystal grains on the surface. However, no significant particulate matter was found on the surface of the PA catalyst before and after the reaction. The number of active sides on the surface of Mn oxides in the PA catalyst is less, resulting in a low NO removal rate for the PA catalyst.

Elemental Analysis
According to Tables 3 and 4, it can be seen that the content of MN in the catalyst increases after the load.

Conclusions
In this paper, oil sludge was used as catalyst carrier, and LiOH was used to modify the carrier. The optimal concentration of modified LiOH catalyst, and the optimal modification time were selected. The effect of modified sludge conditions on the denitration rate was investigated. Subsequently, two catalysts with different activation sequences were prepared. The effect of different activation sequences on the catalytic performance of the sludge denitration catalyst was investigated. We can draw the following conclusions: 1.
Catalysts activated with LiOH at a concentration of 15% have better denitration effects.
The sludge denitration catalyst (AP catalyst) prepared by plasma after being activated first, has a better denitration effect.