Combining the Photocatalysis and Absorption Properties of Core-Shell Cu-BTC@TiO2 Microspheres: Highly Efficient Desulfurization of Thiophenic Compounds from Fuel

A core-shell Cu-benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (Cu-BTC)@TiO2 was successfully synthesized for photocatalysis-assisted adsorptive desulfurization to improve adsorptive desulfurization (ADS) performance. Under ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation, the TiO2 shell on the surface of Cu-BTC achieved photocatalytic oxidation of thiophenic S-compounds, and the Cu-BTC core adsorbed the oxidation products (sulfoxides and sulfones). The photocatalyst and adsorbent were combined using a distinct core-shell structure. The morphology and structure of the fabricated Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres were verified by scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, nitrogen adsorption-desorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. A potential formation mechanism of Cu-BTC@TiO2 is proposed based on complementary experiments. The sulfur removal efficiency of the microspheres was evaluated by selective adsorption of benzothiophene (BT) and dibenzothiophene (DBT) from a model fuel with a sulfur concentration of 1000 ppmw. Within a reaction time of 20 min, the BT and DBT conversion reached 86% and 95%, respectively, and achieved ADS capacities of 63.76 and 59.39 mg/g, respectively. The BT conversion and DBT conversion obtained using Cu-BTC@TiO2 was 6.5 and 4.6 times higher, respectively, than that obtained using Cu-BTC. A desulfurization mechanism was proposed, the interaction between thiophenic sulfur compounds and Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres was discussed, and the kinetic behavior was analyzed.


Introduction
Sulfur compounds in fuel oils present a major air pollution problem because of the sulfur oxide content (SOx, x = 2, 3) in the exhausted gasses. These oxides contribute to acid rain and acid smog, and they are also harmful to human health [1]. Removal of sulfur compounds from petroleum fractions is an urgent concern, as it relates to producing clean fuels and reducing environmental pollution. The commercial desulfurization technology that is currently used in refineries is hydrodesulfurization (HDS), which is operated at high temperatures (about 350 • C) and H 2 pressures (2-10 MPa) [2]. HDS is an efficient method for thiophene (Th), benzothiophene (BT), and dibenzothiophene (DBT), but not for the photocatalytic performances by isopropanol degradation experiments. The experimental results revealed that Cu-BTC can provide a special pathway for photogenerated electrons migration and thus restrain the recombination of electrons and holes to increase the photocatalytic efficiency. However, core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO 2 has not been applied in photocatalysis-assisted adsorptive desulfurization.
To improve desulfurization, desulfurization typically combines the photocatalyst and the adsorbent that selectively remove organosulfur compounds by integrating selective oxidation and solid adsorption. Photocatalysis and adsorption were used together to achieve rapid and deep desulfurization for clean fuel production [34]. In the current study, Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were prepared, with the photocatalyst TiO 2 as the shell and Cu-BTC as the core. The TiO 2 shell on the surface of the Cu-BTC achieved the photocatalytic oxidation of thiophenic S-compounds (BT and DBT), and the Cu-BTC core adsorbed the oxidation products (i.e., the corresponding sulfoxides and sulfones). These microspheres simultaneously separated the catalysts and products via deep desulfurization.

Synthesis
The Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were prepared in two steps: (1) The Cu-BTC core was synthesized as described in the literature [35]. Cu(NO 3 ) 2 ·3H 2 O (0.9 g) and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (0.4 g) were initially dissolved in 50 mL methanol and then stirred to obtain a transparent blue solution.
With the use of a dropper, a 50 mL methanol solution with 0.43 g C 6 H 3 (COOH) 3 was added dropwise into the aforementioned transparent solution to form a blue colloidal suspension. The colloidal solution was then continuously stirred at 400 rpm for 10 min and aged without interruption for another period of 24 h at 25 • C. The obtained blue precipitate was subjected to centrifugation, washed with methanol three times, and oven-dried at 60 • C. (2) A TiO 2 shell was prepared using a versatile kinetics-controlled coating technique [36]. An ethanol dispersion of Cu-BTC core particles (100 mL, 0.3 mg/mL) was added into a conical flask charged with a concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt %, 0.3 mL) under ultrasound for 15 min. About 0.75 mL of TBOT was added dropwise within 5 min. The reaction continued for 24 h at 45 • C with continuous stirring. The resultant product was separated and then washed with deionized water and ethanol 3 times. Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were obtained. The powders were dried at 60 • C overnight and calcined in air at 300 • C for 3 h before use.

Characterization
The morphology of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres was assessed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-1010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). For FESEM, acceleration voltage and working voltage were both 5 kV. TEM and HRTEM were operated with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV (point resolution of 0.23 nm). All the tested samples were sonicated in ethanol about 10 min, and then a drop of this dispersed suspension was placed on a carbon film-coated Cu grid (pore size 74 µm). The as formed sample grid was dried naturally under ambient conditions before insertion into the sample holder. Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping was performed on an FEI Quanta FEG 250 and JEM-2100F instrument (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The crystallographic structures of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 Materials 2018, 11, 2209 4 of 18 microspheres were verified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Bruker, karlsruhe, Germany). XRD patterns were recorded between the range of 5 • and 50 • 2θ by step scanning on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer equipped with a Cu-Kα source (40 kV, 40 mA) at a scanning rate of 5 • /min. The surface areas of the microspheres were obtained by analysis of a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm via the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method on a V-Sorb 2800P surface area and pore distribution analyzer (Gold APP Instruments Corporation, Beijing, China). The microspheres were degassed at 180 • C for 10 h and analyzed with N 2 at 77 K. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were collected using an ESCALab220i-XL electron spectrometer (VG Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 300W AlK α radiation. The base pressure was approximately 3 × 10 −9 mbar. The binding energy references to the C1s line were set to 284.8 eV from adventitious carbon.

Measurement of Desulfurization Performance
The desulfurization performance of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres was evaluated using a 100 mL photochemical reactor (Shanghai jiguang special lighting electric factory, Shanghai, China, see Figure 9) with air bubbled in a constant flow (about 60 L/h) as an oxidant. An appropriate amount of thiophenic S-compound (BT or DBT) was first dissolved into n-octane to be used as a model fuel wifth a sulfur concentration of 1000 ppmw. The light source used was a 300 W high-pressure mercury lamp (Shanghai jiguang special lighting electric factory, Shanghai, China) in a cylindrical quartz reactor equipped with a circulating water jacket. The first step in a typical operation involved heating the water bath to the desired reaction temperature (80 • C), followed by stabilization and adding 10 mL of the model fuel to the reactor. Microspheres were introduced into the reactor, followed by stirring. Samples were taken from the reactor after 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, and 90 min to monitor the progress of the reaction. The microspheres were separated from the reaction system by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The products and byproducts were then analyzed by gas chromatography (GC, Agilent 7890B, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a capillary column (HP-5 column, 30 m × 0.32 mm; carrier gas N 2 ) and a flame ionization detector (FID, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).The injection temperature is 240 • C, injection volume is 2 µL, and split ratio is 50: 1. The oven temperature was initially set to 50 • C for 1 min and then heated at 25 • C/min to 280 • C for 5 min at 280 • C. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a gas chromatograph (Agilent GC-7890A, HP-5 column, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a mass spectrometer (Agilent MSD 5975C, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed to determine the reaction products. A calibration with standard solutions (BT or DBT in octane) from 0 to 2000 ppm was used for quantification of the BT and DBT conversions. The standard curve equation of BT and DBT was Y = 1.3036 X + 1.6912 (R 2 = 0.9993) and Y = 2.0798 X − 27.369 (R 2 = 0.9996), respectively, where Y is the peak area and X is the concentration of BT/DBT (ppm). BT and DBT conversions were calculated as follows: where C 0 denotes the BT or DBT concentration at the start of irradiation, and C t is the BT or DBT concentration at the sampling time.

Characterization of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 Microsphere
The synthetic method for the preparation of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres is presented in Figure 1. Cu-BTC was first prepared and then a TiO 2 layer was deposited on the Cu-BTC surface to form the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microsphere via the TBOT sol-gel method. Under UV light irradiation with Cu-BTC@TiO 2 photocatalysts, the oxidation of the thiophenic compounds was catalyzed into corresponding sulfones. Owing to the strong adsorption of the transformed sulfones into the inside of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres, thiophenic compounds were selectively removed from the model fuel.  Figure 2 presents the typical FESEM and TEM images of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres. Uniform Cu-BTC microparticles with a diameter of approximately 0.5 μm as the core were synthesized (Figure 2A,C). Then, a TiO2 particulate layer was coated on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles by the controlled hydrolysis of TBOT. Uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres with a mean diameter of 0.6 μm were obtained ( Figure 2B,D). The surfaces of the microspheres exhibited a jagged appearance, which may be attributed to small TiO2 particles that adhered to the surface and eventually formed an external layer [37]. Thus, titania is not a very dense shell, and some copper element can be detected on the surface, it can be seen Cu mapping images in Figure 3E. The EDS mapping of Cu-BTC@TiO2 ( Figure 3) indicated that the yellow (red in TEM) and blue dots with bright color assigned to the Cu and Ti elements, respectively, were homogeneously distributed over the core-shell microparticle. The HRTEM image ( Figure 3G) of the region near the interface suggested that the shell was uniformly coated with amorphous TiO2. The thickness of the TiO2 shell was determined to be about 50 nm. As shown by EDS, the Cu-BTC@TiO2 sample exhibited   (Figure 2A,C). Then, a TiO 2 particulate layer was coated on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles by the controlled hydrolysis of TBOT. Uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres with a mean diameter of 0.6 µm were obtained ( Figure 2B,D). The surfaces of the microspheres exhibited a jagged appearance, which may be attributed to small TiO 2 particles that adhered to the surface and eventually formed an external layer [37]. Thus, titania is not a very dense shell, and some copper element can be detected on the surface, it can be seen Cu mapping images in Figure 3E.  Figure 2 presents the typical FESEM and TEM images of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres. Uniform Cu-BTC microparticles with a diameter of approximately 0.5 μm as the core were synthesized (Figure 2A,C). Then, a TiO2 particulate layer was coated on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles by the controlled hydrolysis of TBOT. Uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres with a mean diameter of 0.6 μm were obtained ( Figure 2B,D). The surfaces of the microspheres exhibited a jagged appearance, which may be attributed to small TiO2 particles that adhered to the surface and eventually formed an external layer [37]. Thus, titania is not a very dense shell, and some copper element can be detected on the surface, it can be seen Cu mapping images in Figure 3E. The EDS mapping of Cu-BTC@TiO2 ( Figure 3) indicated that the yellow (red in TEM) and blue dots with bright color assigned to the Cu and Ti elements, respectively, were homogeneously distributed over the core-shell microparticle. The HRTEM image ( Figure 3G) of the region near the interface suggested that the shell was uniformly coated with amorphous TiO2. The thickness of the TiO2 shell was determined to be about 50 nm. As shown by EDS, the Cu-BTC@TiO2 sample exhibited The EDS mapping of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 ( Figure 3) indicated that the yellow (red in TEM) and blue dots with bright color assigned to the Cu and Ti elements, respectively, were homogeneously distributed over the core-shell microparticle. The HRTEM image ( Figure 3G) of the region near the interface suggested that the shell was uniformly coated with amorphous TiO 2 . The thickness of the TiO 2 shell was determined to be about 50 nm. As shown by EDS, the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 sample exhibited a mixed Cu and Ti signal ( Figure 3H). This finding verified that the TiO 2 was uniformly coated onto the surface of the Cu-BTC cores. Cu and Ti were estimated to be 0.35 atom% and 3.06 atom%, respectively. a mixed Cu and Ti signal ( Figure 3H). This finding verified that the TiO2 was uniformly coated onto the surface of the Cu-BTC cores. Cu and Ti were estimated to be 0.35 atom% and 3.06 atom%, respectively. The surface area and pore distribution of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 were analyzed using nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms ( Figure 4). In Figure 4A, the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 samples both presented typical type IV isotherms featuring a large hysteresis loop commonly found in mesoporous materials, suggesting easy transport of the thiophenic S-compounds and products in the pores [38]. The BET specific surface areas of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 were 733 m 2 /g and 901 m 2 /g, respectively. The Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) surface area of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 was markedly increased, likely because the micropore diameter of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 was largely increased by the incorporation of the TiO2 into the Cu-BTC, as observed in Figure 4B. The surface area of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 was markedly increased, whereas the average pore diameter decreased (17 and 8 nm), indicating the dispersion of TiO2 on the surface of the Cu-BTC. The surface area and pore distribution of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 were analyzed using nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms ( Figure 4). In Figure 4A, the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 samples both presented typical type IV isotherms featuring a large hysteresis loop commonly found in mesoporous materials, suggesting easy transport of the thiophenic S-compounds and products in the pores [38]. The BET specific surface areas of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 were 733 m 2 /g and 901 m 2 /g, respectively. The Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) surface area of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was markedly increased, likely because the micropore diameter of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was largely increased by the incorporation of the TiO 2 into the Cu-BTC, as observed in Figure 4B. The surface area of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was markedly increased, whereas the average pore diameter decreased (17 and 8 nm), indicating the dispersion of TiO 2 on the surface of the Cu-BTC. XPS was employed for the surface chemical composition and elemental composition analysis of the Cu-BTC, Cu-BTC@TiO2 and pure TiO2. The survey spectrum in Figure 5A reveals two sharp peaks at 284.8 and 532.4 eV that may be attributed to the C 1s and O 1s binding energies, respectively. This finding suggested that the two main species in both samples were C and O [39]. Moreover, the peaks at 399.5 and 935.7 eV corresponded to N 1s and Cu 2p of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2. In addition, the XPS spectrum of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 and pure TiO2 showed new peaks that we may assign to Ti 2p. As shown in the high-resolution spectrum of O ( Figure 5B), the binding energy for O 1s appears at approximately 532.4 eV, which is attributed to the presence of O 2− ions in the crystalline network of the Cu-BTC [40]. In the case of Cu-BTC@TiO2, the asymmetrical O 1s region could be deconvoluted into two peaks at 532.4 and 530.0 eV. The first peak was also associated with O 2− ions in the Cu-BTC, whereas the second peak was related to Ti-O bonds in TiO2 on the basis of other XPS results on TiO2 [41,42]. But the binding energies of pure TiO2 at 529.5 eV which decreased 0.5 eV in comparison with the binding energies of Cu-BTC@TiO2. Figure 5C presents the XPS spectra of the Cu 2p region. Divalent Cu 2+ showed a characteristic peak at 935.7 eV, which corresponds with the Cu 2p3/2 and another peak at 956.1 eV that relates to the Cu 2p1/2 [43]. "Shake-up satellite bands" appeared in the 930-970 eV range, except for the 2 characteristic peaks that appeared in the Cu spectra. This observation generally indicates the presence of Cu (II) species [44]. However, the Cu-BTC@TiO2 suggested a small change in the Cu 2p XPS spectra. The binding energies of Cu 2p3/2 shifted from 935.7 to 935.0 eV, and those for Cu 2p1/2 shifted from 956.1 to 955.1 eV. These shifts indicated changes in the chemical environment of the Cu. However, this result is still higher than the peak positions for reduced copper species (Cu 0 peak at 932.5 eV and Cu +1 peak at 933.3 eV) [45,46]. It is suggested that Cu maintains in oxidation state which be further confirmed by two satellite peaks at 944.5 eV and 964.9 eV [47]. The FWHM (full width at half maximum) reduced from 3.99 to 3.15 eV. The intensity of the "shake-up satellite" bands was simultaneously reduced. Electron density around atoms exerts a shielding effect on binding energy [48]. Thus, the decrease in binding energy may have resulted from the enhanced electron density around the Cu atoms, suggesting that the Cu 2+ center accepted lone pair electrons donated by groups of titanium and oxide species, given that the electronic interaction among Cu, Ti and O was attributed to TiO2 loading. Figure 5D shows a high-resolution XPS spectra of the Ti 2p. The binding energies of Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2 at 464.3 and 458.5 eV, respectively, were contributed by the O-Ti-O bonding with the TiO2 [49]. For pure TiO2, the binding energies were decreased to 464.0 and 458.3 eV, respectively. These suggested that the TiO2-loaded can promote the reduction of Cu 2+ and the oxidation of Ti 2+ . This implied that Ti oxide species might donate partial electrons to Cu species, the electron transfer between Ti/O and Cu due to the TiO2loaded. Therefore, the electron density and charge distribution in the atoms on the Cu-BTC@TiO2 surface may change with the addition of TiO2, potentially enhancing the desulfurization activity of the Cu-BTC@TiO2. The surface atomic contents of Cu-BTC@TiO2 were 0.45% for Cu and 3.68% for Ti. The aforementioned chemical composition agrees with the results of the EDS analysis ( Figure 3). XPS was employed for the surface chemical composition and elemental composition analysis of the Cu-BTC, Cu-BTC@TiO 2 and pure TiO 2 . The survey spectrum in Figure 5A reveals two sharp peaks at 284.8 and 532.4 eV that may be attributed to the C 1s and O 1s binding energies, respectively. This finding suggested that the two main species in both samples were C and O [39]. Moreover, the peaks at 399.5 and 935.7 eV corresponded to N 1s and Cu 2p of the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 . In addition, the XPS spectrum of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 and pure TiO 2 showed new peaks that we may assign to Ti 2p. As shown in the high-resolution spectrum of O ( Figure 5B), the binding energy for O 1s appears at approximately 532.4 eV, which is attributed to the presence of O 2− ions in the crystalline network of the Cu-BTC [40]. In the case of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 , the asymmetrical O 1s region could be deconvoluted into two peaks at 532.4 and 530.0 eV. The first peak was also associated with O 2− ions in the Cu-BTC, whereas the second peak was related to Ti-O bonds in TiO 2 on the basis of other XPS results on TiO 2 [41,42]. But the binding energies of pure TiO 2 at 529.5 eV which decreased 0.5 eV in comparison with the binding energies of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 . Figure 5C presents the XPS spectra of the Cu 2p region. Divalent Cu 2+ showed a characteristic peak at 935.7 eV, which corresponds with the Cu 2p3/2 and another peak at 956.1 eV that relates to the Cu 2p1/2 [43]. "Shake-up satellite bands" appeared in the 930-970 eV range, except for the 2 characteristic peaks that appeared in the Cu spectra. This observation generally indicates the presence of Cu (II) species [44]. However, the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 suggested a small change in the Cu 2p XPS spectra. The binding energies of Cu 2p3/2 shifted from 935.7 to 935.0 eV, and those for Cu 2p1/2 shifted from 956.1 to 955.1 eV. These shifts indicated changes in the chemical environment of the Cu. However, this result is still higher than the peak positions for reduced copper species (Cu 0 peak at 932.5 eV and Cu +1 peak at 933.3 eV) [45,46]. It is suggested that Cu maintains in oxidation state which be further confirmed by two satellite peaks at 944.5 eV and 964.9 eV [47]. The FWHM (full width at half maximum) reduced from 3.99 to 3.15 eV. The intensity of the "shake-up satellite" bands was simultaneously reduced. Electron density around atoms exerts a shielding effect on binding energy [48]. Thus, the decrease in binding energy may have resulted from the enhanced electron density around the Cu atoms, suggesting that the Cu 2+ center accepted lone pair electrons donated by groups of titanium and oxide species, given that the electronic interaction among Cu, Ti and O was attributed to TiO 2 loading. Figure 5D shows a high-resolution XPS spectra of the Ti 2p. The binding energies of Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2 at 464.3 and 458.5 eV, respectively, were contributed by the O-Ti-O bonding with the TiO 2 [49]. For pure TiO 2 , the binding energies were decreased to 464.0 and 458.3 eV, respectively. These suggested that the TiO 2 -loaded can promote the reduction of Cu 2+ and the oxidation of Ti 2+ . This implied that Ti oxide species might donate partial electrons to Cu species, the electron transfer between Ti/O and Cu due to the TiO 2 -loaded. Therefore, the electron density and charge distribution in the atoms on the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 surface may change with the addition of TiO 2 , potentially enhancing the desulfurization activity of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 .
The surface atomic contents of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 were 0.45% for Cu and 3.68% for Ti. The aforementioned chemical composition agrees with the results of the EDS analysis ( Figure 3).

General Analysis of Controlling Factors
Figure 6A-C presents the FESEM images of Cu-BTC@TiO2 prepared under different conditions. As shown in Figure 6A, the coverage of the TiO2 particulate increases when TiF4 is used as a titanium source. When the volume of TBOT decreased to 0.1 mL, the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles was covered with a thin layer of TiO2 particulate ( Figure 6B), and the Cu-BTC exhibited a distinct shape. In Figure 6C, the TiO2 particulate attached to the Cu-BTC surface appears to be loosely adhering, and the microspheres are not compact. These results suggested that the morphology of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 was significantly influenced by the synthesis conditions.
The corresponding XRD patterns of the samples are shown in Figure 6D. The XRD reference pattern simulated from the crystallographic data of Cu-BTC had five typical diffraction peaks assigned to 6.70°, 9.48°, 11.62°, 13.42°, and 17.48° [50], which correspondes with the (200), (220), (222), (400), and (511) planes of the Cu3(BTC)2 [51]. The Cu-BTC exhibited characteristic diffraction peaks of 9.56°, 11.50°, 13.90°, and 17.60°, and 19.10°, and the main four signals of the samples matched well with the results of simulated Cu-BTC, suggesting that the Cu-BTC was successfully synthesized. XRD patterns. As for Cu-BTC@TiO2, the diffraction peak at 5°-50° assigned to the Cu-BTC phase appeared weak and broad. This finding indicates the reduction in crystallinity and TiO2 on the surface of Cu-BTC are amorphization, which agrees with the HRTEM results presented in Figure 3G. The Cu-BTC peaks might be covered by the peaks of amorphous TiO2 and would be difficult to observe [52]. Thus, the XRD patterns of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 showed no crystalline phases, except for the broad peak arising from an amorphous TiO2 shell [53]. In all cases, diffractions that could be ascribed to titanium oxides were difficult to observe, indicating that the Ti species was amorphous structure.  Figure 6A-C presents the FESEM images of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 prepared under different conditions. As shown in Figure 6A, the coverage of the TiO 2 particulate increases when TiF 4 is used as a titanium source. When the volume of TBOT decreased to 0.1 mL, the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles was covered with a thin layer of TiO 2 particulate ( Figure 6B), and the Cu-BTC exhibited a distinct shape. In Figure 6C, the TiO 2 particulate attached to the Cu-BTC surface appears to be loosely adhering, and the microspheres are not compact. These results suggested that the morphology of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was significantly influenced by the synthesis conditions.

General Analysis of Controlling Factors
The corresponding XRD patterns of the samples are shown in Figure 6D. The XRD reference pattern simulated from the crystallographic data of Cu-BTC had five typical diffraction peaks assigned to 6.70 • , 9.48 • , 11.62 • , 13.42 • , and 17.48 • [50], which correspondes with the (200), (220), (222), (400), and (511) planes of the Cu 3 (BTC) 2 [51]. The Cu-BTC exhibited characteristic diffraction peaks of 9.56 • , 11.50 • , 13.90 • , and 17.60 • , and 19.10 • , and the main four signals of the samples matched well with the results of simulated Cu-BTC, suggesting that the Cu-BTC was successfully synthesized. XRD patterns. As for Cu-BTC@TiO 2 , the diffraction peak at 5 • -50 • assigned to the Cu-BTC phase appeared weak and broad. This finding indicates the reduction in crystallinity and TiO 2 on the surface of Cu-BTC are amorphization, which agrees with the HRTEM results presented in Figure 3G. The Cu-BTC peaks might be covered by the peaks of amorphous TiO 2 and would be difficult to observe [52]. Thus, the XRD patterns of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 showed no crystalline phases, except for the broad peak arising from an amorphous TiO 2 shell [53]. In all cases, diffractions that could be ascribed to titanium oxides were difficult to observe, indicating that the Ti species was amorphous structure.

Formation Mechanism
The coating of the TiO2 layer used ammonia as a catalyst for the hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT. Figure 7A shows that there is very little hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT because of the absence of ammonia in the solution. Figure 7B shows that with an increase in ammonia content to 0.2 mL, the heterogeneous nucleation of TiO2 occurs on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles, and uniform microspheric TiO2 shells are formed. After the 24 h reaction, the TiO2 microspheres continued to grow, forming TiO2 particulates ( Figure 7C). As shown in Figure 7D, an increase in ammonia content to 0.4 mL prevents the polymerization of titanium oligomers on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles to a certain degree; however, homogeneous nucleation and growth can occur in the solution with a reaction time of 12 h. This finding suggested that an excessive amount of ammonia prompted the rapid hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT. This effect induced the simultaneous occurrence of heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation and growth, allowing the formation of aggregated structures [36]. When the reaction time was extended to 24 h, the TiO2 sphere turned into a TiO2 particle and grew on the surface of the Cu-BTC microspheres; also, the TiO2 shells thickened to 300 nm ( Figure 7E). A milky white suspension appeared when the core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres were removed from the mixtures. This appearance suggested the formation of TiO2 nanoparticles in the solution and the occurrence of homogeneous nucleation ( Figure 7F). A schematic of the mechanism underlying the formation of Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres is presented in Figure 7G. These results suggested that ammonia significantly controlled the reaction kinetics for the preparation of the uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres.

Formation Mechanism
The coating of the TiO 2 layer used ammonia as a catalyst for the hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT. Figure 7A shows that there is very little hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT because of the absence of ammonia in the solution. Figure 7B shows that with an increase in ammonia content to 0.2 mL, the heterogeneous nucleation of TiO 2 occurs on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles, and uniform microspheric TiO 2 shells are formed. After the 24 h reaction, the TiO 2 microspheres continued to grow, forming TiO 2 particulates ( Figure 7C). As shown in Figure 7D, an increase in ammonia content to 0.4 mL prevents the polymerization of titanium oligomers on the surface of the Cu-BTC microparticles to a certain degree; however, homogeneous nucleation and growth can occur in the solution with a reaction time of 12 h. This finding suggested that an excessive amount of ammonia prompted the rapid hydrolysis and condensation of the TBOT. This effect induced the simultaneous occurrence of heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation and growth, allowing the formation of aggregated structures [36]. When the reaction time was extended to 24 h, the TiO 2 sphere turned into a TiO 2 particle and grew on the surface of the Cu-BTC microspheres; also, the TiO 2 shells thickened to 300 nm ( Figure 7E). A milky white suspension appeared when the core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were removed from the mixtures. This appearance suggested the formation of TiO 2 nanoparticles in the solution and the occurrence of homogeneous nucleation ( Figure 7F). A schematic of the mechanism underlying the formation of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres is presented in Figure 7G.
These results suggested that ammonia significantly controlled the reaction kinetics for the preparation of the uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres.

Desulfurization Performance
The sulfur removal efficiency of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 was evaluated, and the results are shown in Figure 8. With Cu-BTC as the adsorbent for the desulfurization of the model fuel, a BT removal efficiency of less than 30% was obtained. This result indicated that pure Cu-BTC exhibited an extremely low conversion rate, and that the Ti-species in the Cu-BTC played the main role in the catalytic activity. As shown in Figure 8, an increase in reaction time induces considerable increases BT and DBT conversion. Within a 20 min reaction time, BT conversion reached 86%, and DBT conversion reached 96%. These conversions achieved high ADS capacities of 63.76 and 59.39 mg/g. Sulfur contents of BT and DBT in the model oil over Cu-BTC@TiO2 were reduced to 140 and 47 ppmw. Cu-BTC@TiO2 exhibited BT and DBT conversion that was 6.5 and 4.6 times higher than that of the Cu-BTC, respectively. The Cu-BTC@TiO2 obtained similar sulfur removal efficiencies for BT and DBT given a 90 min reaction time (>99%). Ultimately, in the oxidation/adsorption process, less than 10 ppmw BT and less than 20 ppmw DBT was retained in the n-octane phase, which achieved maximal ADS capacities of 73.37 and 62.53 mg/g, respectively. The electron densities of sulfur atoms in the BT and DBT were 5.739 and 5.758, respectively [54], indicating that the catalytic activity of the BT was lower than that of the DBT.
A report [55][56][57] indicated that a reaction time of at least 30 min would be required to achieve 90% BT and DBT conversion. In the present study, the reaction time required was only 20 min,

Desulfurization Performance
The sulfur removal efficiency of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was evaluated, and the results are shown in Figure 8. With Cu-BTC as the adsorbent for the desulfurization of the model fuel, a BT removal efficiency of less than 30% was obtained. This result indicated that pure Cu-BTC exhibited an extremely low conversion rate, and that the Ti-species in the Cu-BTC played the main role in the catalytic activity. As shown in Figure 8, an increase in reaction time induces considerable increases BT and DBT conversion. Within a 20 min reaction time, BT conversion reached 86%, and DBT conversion reached 96%. These conversions achieved high ADS capacities of 63.76 and 59.39 mg/g. Sulfur contents of BT and DBT in the model oil over Cu-BTC@TiO 2 were reduced to 140 and 47 ppmw. Cu-BTC@TiO 2 exhibited BT and DBT conversion that was 6.5 and 4.6 times higher than that of the Cu-BTC, respectively. The Cu-BTC@TiO 2 obtained similar sulfur removal efficiencies for BT and DBT given a 90 min reaction time (>99%). Ultimately, in the oxidation/adsorption process, less than 10 ppmw BT and less than 20 ppmw DBT was retained in the n-octane phase, which achieved maximal ADS capacities of 73.37 and 62.53 mg/g, respectively. The electron densities of sulfur atoms in the BT and DBT were 5.739 and 5.758, respectively [54], indicating that the catalytic activity of the BT was lower than that of the DBT. microspheres, spent Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres were washed using a polar solvent (acetonitrile). Figure 8C shows that given a retention time of 8.18 min, a new peak appears, except in the case of the BT. The new peak was benzothiophene sulfone (BTO2), as confirmed by GC-MS. Figure 8D shows similar results for DBT. These findings suggest that during desulfurization, UV light irradiation facilitated the oxidation of BT/DBT to BTO2/DBTO2 under ambient conditions. Consequently, thiophenic compounds were oxidized by the TiO2 shell into corresponding sulfones. Meanwhile, intensive absorption occurred between the oxidation products and the inside of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres. These microspheres could simultaneously separate catalysts and products in conditions of deep desulfurization.  A report [55][56][57] indicated that a reaction time of at least 30 min would be required to achieve 90% BT and DBT conversion. In the present study, the reaction time required was only 20 min, allowing for the reduction of BT and DBT content in the model oil to 140 and 47 ppmw, with sulfur removal efficiencies of 86% and 95%, respectively. Photocatalysis and adsorption were combined to achieve rapid and deep desulfurization. Therefore, the TiO 2 shell was the most active site on the surface of the Cu-BTC for BT and DBT oxidation, and the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 exhibited higher desulfurization efficiency, as compared with Cu-BTC. This finding was attributed to the coexistence and synergistic effects of TiO 2 and Cu-BTC in the microspheres [58]. Figure 8C,D present the gas chromatography (GC) results of the model fuel containing BT (C) and DBT (D), desulfurization samples at different adsorption times, and the eluent of the used Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres. As shown in Figure 8C, the peak intensity of BT decreases with adsorption time; however, the chromatograms of desulfurized fuel samples showed no new peaks. To determine how UV light irradiation promoted the sulfur chemistry during desulfurization over Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres, spent Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were washed using a polar solvent (acetonitrile). Figure 8C shows that given a retention time of 8.18 min, a new peak appears, except in the case of the BT. The new peak was benzothiophene sulfone (BTO 2 ), as confirmed by GC-MS. Figure 8D shows similar results for DBT. These findings suggest that during desulfurization, UV light irradiation facilitated the oxidation of BT/DBT to BTO 2 /DBTO 2 under ambient conditions. Consequently, thiophenic compounds were oxidized by the TiO 2 shell into corresponding sulfones. Meanwhile, intensive absorption occurred between the oxidation products and the inside of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres. These microspheres could simultaneously separate catalysts and products in conditions of deep desulfurization.

The Proposed Desulfurization Mechanism
This desulfurization system consisted of liquid phases (n-octane and BT/DBT), a solid phase (Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres), and oxygen. Both BT/DBT oxidation reactions and absorption occurred at liquid-solid interfaces. Figure 9 presents the proposed desulfurization mechanism consisting of seven steps: (1) generation of Bronsted acid Ti(IV)-OH sites under UV irradiation by means of the interaction between chemisorbed H 2 O and bridged-OH groups [26]; (2) enrichment of BT/DBT at the Ti(IV)-OH sites by acid-base interaction; (3) oxidation reaction in the TiO 2 shell between titanium-based active intermediate species (titanium complexes) and enriched BT/DBT; (4) adsorption of oxidation product sulfones (BTO 2 /DBTO 2 ) on the surface of the Cu-BTC core at the metal cation (Cu 2+ ) sites by acid-base interaction [59]; (5) extraction of BTO 2 /DBTO 2 inside the microspheres; (6) simultaneous separation of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres from the solution by simple filtration; and (7) washing of the collected microspheres alternately with acetone and acetonitrile several times to release the sulfones from the microspheres. The washed microspheres may be re-used.

The Proposed Desulfurization Mechanism
This desulfurization system consisted of liquid phases (n-octane and BT/DBT), a solid phase (Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres), and oxygen. Both BT/DBT oxidation reactions and absorption occurred at liquid-solid interfaces. Figure 9 presents the proposed desulfurization mechanism consisting of seven steps: (1) generation of Bronsted acid Ti(IV)-OH sites under UV irradiation by means of the interaction between chemisorbed H2O and bridged-OH groups [26]; (2) enrichment of BT/DBT at the Ti(IV)-OH sites by acid-base interaction; (3) oxidation reaction in the TiO2 shell between titaniumbased active intermediate species (titanium complexes) and enriched BT/DBT; (4) adsorption of oxidation product sulfones (BTO2/DBTO2) on the surface of the Cu-BTC core at the metal cation (Cu 2+ ) sites by acid-base interaction [59]; (5) extraction of BTO2/DBTO2 inside the microspheres; (6) simultaneous separation of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres from the solution by simple filtration; and (7) washing of the collected microspheres alternately with acetone and acetonitrile several times to release the sulfones from the microspheres. The washed microspheres may be re-used.

Interaction between Thiophenic Sulfur Compounds and Cu-BTC@TiO2 Microspheres
During surface reactions, the TiO2 shell exhibited photocatalytic oxidation activity. When O2 was used as the oxidant, photo-generated electron transfer to O2 on the TiO2 was observed. Superoxide anion radicals (O2 − ) were formed on this surface when O2 reacted with the photo-generated electrons, which could oxidize thiophenic sulfur compounds to sulfoxide or sulfone. The desulfurization was conducted in an open-air system, and limited dissolved oxygen could generate ·OH by reacting ·O2 − with H + . The source of the H + ions could be the hydroxyl groups on the surface and the hydroxyl groups of absorbed water vapor in the air [25]. As the dominant oxidant in photo-oxidation reactions, hydroxyl radicals play a major part in BT/DBT oxidation [42]. Photocatalytic oxidation reactions occurred via the nucleophilic attack of the free electron pairs of sulfur in the BT/DBT by positively charged Ti 4+ from titanium complexes (Ti-hydroperoxo or Ti-peroxo species [60]) to generate sulfoxide (BTO/DBTO). The resulting sulfoxide was subjected to another oxidation cycle by the

Interaction between Thiophenic Sulfur Compounds and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 Microspheres
During surface reactions, the TiO 2 shell exhibited photocatalytic oxidation activity. When O 2 was used as the oxidant, photo-generated electron transfer to O 2 on the TiO 2 was observed. Superoxide anion radicals (O 2 − ) were formed on this surface when O 2 reacted with the photo-generated electrons, which could oxidize thiophenic sulfur compounds to sulfoxide or sulfone. The desulfurization was conducted in an open-air system, and limited dissolved oxygen could generate ·OH by reacting ·O 2 − with H + . The source of the H + ions could be the hydroxyl groups on the surface and the hydroxyl groups of absorbed water vapor in the air [25]. As the dominant oxidant in photo-oxidation reactions, hydroxyl radicals play a major part in BT/DBT oxidation [42]. Photocatalytic oxidation reactions occurred via the nucleophilic attack of the free electron pairs of sulfur in the BT/DBT by positively charged Ti 4+ from titanium complexes (Ti-hydroperoxo or Ti-peroxo species [60]) to generate sulfoxide (BTO/DBTO). The resulting sulfoxide was subjected to another oxidation cycle by the feedback of free electrons that attacked another titanium complex in order to produce sulfone (BTO 2 /DBTO 2 ). The second oxidation step seemed to progress more quickly than the first one probably because no BTO/DBTO was detected in the final products.
In the absorption step, the Cu-BTC core provided adsorption sites. Cu-BTC could act as a Lewis acid because of its coordinately unsaturated sites (CUSs) that could accept electrons pair from donor molecules. The interaction with Lewis acidic metal ion sites by coordination, and Pearson's hard and soft acid and bases, explained the adsorption of the basic thiophenic compounds [59]. Thus, soft sulfone bases were highly attracted to soft Lewis acids, such as Cu ions.
Moreover, the XPS result of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres indicated that the Cu 2+ center could potentially accept lone pairs of electrons from donating groups of Ti oxide species; it also indicated that the electron density around the Cu atoms was increased, which could be attributed to π-complexation [61]. The interaction of Cu species with the π-electrons of BTO 2 /DBTO 2 molecules led to the formation of strong π-complex bonds between the Cu and the oxygen atom of the sulfone molecule; this process hastened the adsorption of BTO 2 /DBTO 2 [62]. Thus, the electronic interaction between Cu and Ti significantly influenced the adsorption capacity of the sulfones.
Therefore, the synergistic effect of Cu-BTC as an adsorbent and TiO 2 as a catalyst, which captured hydroxyl radicals/activate Th molecules, contributed to the efficient transfer of photo-excited electrons and the oxidation of BT/DBT. In addition, the synergistic effect to which the high desulfurization activity of thiophenic sulfur compounds was attributed increased the rate of the oxidation reaction [24].
The effect of TBOT volume on BT/DBT conversion was showed in Figure 10A. With increase of tetrabutylortotitanate (TBOT) volume from 0.1 mL to 0.75 mL, the BT/DBT conversion increased remarkably. But when TBOT volume increased to 1.5 mL, the BT/DBT conversion almost stable. It is indicated that when adding small amount of Ti, the oxidation activity is too low to transform BT/DBT and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres present absorption preformance primarily. When Ti amount exceed 0.75 mL, more Ti cannot coat on the surface of Cu-BTC, thus the BT/DBT conversion was constant. In conclusion, adding 0.75 mL of TBOT volume is the optimum. At the end of the reaction, the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres were recovered by simple filtration, washed with acetone, dried, and then subjected to another cycle of desulfurization ( Figure 10B). BT removal of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 decreased to 83.9% after it was used 3 times, and ADS capacity decreased to 31.17 mg/g. DBT removal of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was reduced to 89.8% after it was used 3 times, and ADS capacity decreased to 54.55 mg/g. These results indicated that the deactivation of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres could be inhibited by the core-shell structure; such inhibition ensures good recyclability. In addition, the catalysts regenerated by acetone could improve in repeated-use performance. feedback of free electrons that attacked another titanium complex in order to produce sulfone (BTO2/DBTO2). The second oxidation step seemed to progress more quickly than the first one probably because no BTO/DBTO was detected in the final products.
In the absorption step, the Cu-BTC core provided adsorption sites. Cu-BTC could act as a Lewis acid because of its coordinately unsaturated sites (CUSs) that could accept electrons pair from donor molecules. The interaction with Lewis acidic metal ion sites by coordination, and Pearson's hard and soft acid and bases, explained the adsorption of the basic thiophenic compounds [59]. Thus, soft sulfone bases were highly attracted to soft Lewis acids, such as Cu ions.
Moreover, the XPS result of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres indicated that the Cu 2+ center could potentially accept lone pairs of electrons from donating groups of Ti oxide species; it also indicated that the electron density around the Cu atoms was increased, which could be attributed to πcomplexation [61]. The interaction of Cu species with the π-electrons of BTO2/DBTO2 molecules led to the formation of strong π-complex bonds between the Cu and the oxygen atom of the sulfone molecule; this process hastened the adsorption of BTO2/DBTO2 [62]. Thus, the electronic interaction between Cu and Ti significantly influenced the adsorption capacity of the sulfones.
Therefore, the synergistic effect of Cu-BTC as an adsorbent and TiO2 as a catalyst, which captured hydroxyl radicals/activate Th molecules, contributed to the efficient transfer of photoexcited electrons and the oxidation of BT/DBT. In addition, the synergistic effect to which the high desulfurization activity of thiophenic sulfur compounds was attributed increased the rate of the oxidation reaction [24].
The effect of TBOT volume on BT/DBT conversion was showed in Figure 10A. With increase of tetrabutylortotitanate (TBOT) volume from 0.1 mL to 0.75 mL, the BT/DBT conversion increased remarkably. But when TBOT volume increased to 1.5 mL, the BT/DBT conversion almost stable. It is indicated that when adding small amount of Ti, the oxidation activity is too low to transform BT/DBT and Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres present absorption preformance primarily. When Ti amount exceed 0.75 mL, more Ti cannot coat on the surface of Cu-BTC, thus the BT/DBT conversion was constant. In conclusion, adding 0.75 mL of TBOT volume is the optimum. At the end of the reaction, the Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres were recovered by simple filtration, washed with acetone, dried, and then subjected to another cycle of desulfurization ( Figure 10B). BT removal of Cu-BTC@TiO2 decreased to 83.9% after it was used 3 times, and ADS capacity decreased to 31.17 mg/g. DBT removal of Cu-BTC@TiO2 was reduced to 89.8% after it was used 3 times, and ADS capacity decreased to 54.55 mg/g. These results indicated that the deactivation of Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres could be inhibited by the core-shell structure; such inhibition ensures good recyclability. In addition, the catalysts regenerated by acetone could improve in repeated-use performance.

Kinetic Calculations
The changes in −ln(C/C 0 ) versus time (t) for the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 are presented in Figure 11. The linear relationships obtained confirm the pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics proposed. The reaction equation is expressed as follows [41]: −ln(C/C 0 ) = kt (2) where C 0 and C are the initial and reaction time concentrations of BT/DBT, respectively; k is the apparent rate constant, and t is the desulfurization time. The slope of the linear fitted plot indicates the apparent rate constant for desulfurization. Table 1 presents the values of k obtained in the present study; the results show that Cu-BTC@TiO 2 significantly and positively influences the desulfurization of BT/DBT. The k value of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 was almost 100-fold higher than that of the Cu-BTC under the same reaction conditions. This difference demonstrates the considerably higher desulfurization efficiency of BT/DBT over Cu-BTC@TiO 2 versus that of Cu-BTC. The linear coefficient (R 2 ) was also higher than 0.95 for Cu-BTC@TiO 2 . This difference suggests that the desulfurization of BT/DBT followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, and that the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 creates efficient desulfurization microspheres for BT/DBT.

Kinetic Calculations
The changes in −ln(C/C0) versus time (t) for the Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 are presented in Figure 11. The linear relationships obtained confirm the pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics proposed. The reaction equation is expressed as follows [41]: −ln(C/C0) = kt (2) where C0 and C are the initial and reaction time concentrations of BT/DBT, respectively; k is the apparent rate constant, and t is the desulfurization time. The slope of the linear fitted plot indicates the apparent rate constant for desulfurization. Table 1 presents the values of k obtained in the present study; the results show that Cu-BTC@TiO2 significantly and positively influences the desulfurization of BT/DBT. The k value of Cu-BTC@TiO2 was almost 100-fold higher than that of the Cu-BTC under the same reaction conditions. This difference demonstrates the considerably higher desulfurization efficiency of BT/DBT over Cu-BTC@TiO2 versus that of Cu-BTC. The linear coefficient (R 2 ) was also higher than 0.95 for Cu-BTC@TiO2. This difference suggests that the desulfurization of BT/DBT followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, and that the Cu-BTC@TiO2 creates efficient desulfurization microspheres for BT/DBT.  Higher rate constants were obtained for DBT than for BT. These results indicate that DBT could be more easily desulfurized than BT. The performance of Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 in BT/DBT desulfurization generally improved as electron density on the S-atom increased [63]. The rate constants for BT/DBT over Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 exhibited a high correlation with the corresponding electron densities, which were 5.739 and 5.758, respectively, as calculated by Otstuki et al. [54].

Conclusions
Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres exhibiting photocatalysis-assisted adsorptive desulfurization were successfully synthesized. The microspheres combined TiO2 photocatalysts and a Cu-BTC adsorbent that selectively removed thiophenic S-compounds by integrating with selective oxidation and solid adsorption. The diameter of the Cu-BTC@TiO2 microspheres was approximately 0.6 μm. FESEM, and  Higher rate constants were obtained for DBT than for BT. These results indicate that DBT could be more easily desulfurized than BT. The performance of Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 in BT/DBT desulfurization generally improved as electron density on the S-atom increased [63]. The rate constants for BT/DBT over Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO 2 exhibited a high correlation with the corresponding electron densities, which were 5.739 and 5.758, respectively, as calculated by Otstuki et al. [54].

Conclusions
Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres exhibiting photocatalysis-assisted adsorptive desulfurization were successfully synthesized. The microspheres combined TiO 2 photocatalysts and a Cu-BTC adsorbent that selectively removed thiophenic S-compounds by integrating with selective oxidation and solid adsorption. The diameter of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres was approximately 0.6 µm. FESEM, and HRTEM images revealed the jagged surface of the microspheres, which suggested the formation of an external layer by the adhesion of small TiO 2 particles. A mixed Cu and Ti signal was obtained from the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 sample by EDS mapping. BET showed that Cu-BTC and Cu-BTC@TiO2 obtained large increases in surface area and significant reductions in the average pore diameter (16.64 and 8.04 nm, respectively). These results indicated the dispersion of TiO 2 on the surface of the Cu-BTC. The XPS results showed that adding TiO 2 induced changes in the electron density and charge distribution of the atoms on the surface of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 . These changes could potentially enhance the desulfurization activity of the Cu-BTC@TiO 2 . In the coating process of the TiO 2 layer, carefully controlled ammonia content played a key role in controlling the reaction kinetics to construct uniform core-shell Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres. The as-synthesized Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres showed excellent desulfurization performance. Within a 20 min reaction time, BT conversion reached 86%, and DBT conversion was as high as 95%. These results achieved high ADS capacities of 63.76 and 59.39 mg/g, respectively. Sulfur contents in the model oil were reduced to 140 and 47 ppmw. Cu-BTC@TiO 2 exhibits BT and DBT conversion rates that were 6.5 and 4.6 times higher than that of Cu-BTC, respectively. The proposed 7-step desulfurization mechanism and the synergistic effect of Cu-BTC (as an adsorbent) and TiO 2 (as a catalyst), which capture hydroxyl radicals/activate molecules, contributed to the efficient transfer of photo-excited electrons and to the oxidation of BT/DBT. In addition, the aforementioned mechanism and synergistic effects, to which the high desulfurization activity of the thiophenic sulfur compounds could be attributed, increased the rate of the oxidation reaction. Kinetic studies demonstrated that the desulfurization kinetics of BT/DBT followed a pseudo-first-order reaction. The used microspheres could be readily regenerated using a solvent washing method. The microspheres could also be reused at least 3 times. The results of this study demonstrate that the combination of photocatalysis and adsorption could achieve rapid and deep desulfurization. The study also shows the potential use of Cu-BTC@TiO 2 microspheres as an adsorbent for the removal of thiophenic sulfurs from fuels.