How to Decarbonize Greece by Comparing Wind and PV Energy: A Land Eligibility Analysis

: To achieve sustainable development, the energy transition from lignite burning to renewable energy resources for electric power generation is essential for Greece. Wind and solar energy have emerged as significant sources in this transition. Surprisingly, numerous studies have examined the potential for onshore wind based on land eligibility, while few studies on open-field photovoltaic (PV) installations have been conducted. Therefore, based on the Specific Framework for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development for Renewable Energy Sources (SFSPSD-RES), along with insights from previous relevant studies, this work conducts a land eligibility analysis of onshore wind and open-field PV installations in Greece using the software Geospatial Land Availability for Energy Systems (GLAES 1.2.1) and ArcGIS 10.2. Additionally, through an in-depth exploration of wind and solar PV energy potential in decommissioned lignite mines integrated with wind power density (WPD) and global horizontal irradiation (GHI) maps, this study compares the suitability of wind versus solar as energy sources for the decarbonization of Greece. Overall, despite the greater spatial eligibility for onshore wind turbines compared to open-field PV power plants, the relatively lower wind energy potential and operational limitations of wind turbines lead to the study’s conclusion that solar energy (PV) is more suitable for the decarbonization of Greece.


Introduction
In order to keep the global average temperature rise well below 2 K above preindustrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature rise to 1.5 K, the Paris Climate Agreement was signed by 196 countries in 2015 [1].Greece, as one of the signatory countries, has set national energy policies in different periods to achieve a phased sustainable development.Since the early 1960s, Greece has met most of its electric power demand from thermal power stations burning either lignite on the mainland or heavy fuel oil on the islands.Based on the European Energy Policy, the goal of renewable energy penetration in 2020 (Law 3851/2020) formulated at the national level in Greece in 2010 marked the start of the Greek energy transition [2].As Figure 1 shows, Greek electric power generation shifted from coal to natural gas by 2020 and wind and solar PV gradually became important sources of electric power generation recently [3].In terms of power generation resources for Greece, solar accounted for 10.7% of the total installed capacity, Energies 2024, 17, 567 2 of 26 while wind accounted for 23% of the total installed capacity in 2023 [4].For the country's sustainable development, further electric power generation from renewable energy sources (RESs) is needed.The Greek National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) aims to deploy renewable energy generation systems on the islands, interconnect them with the electricity grid on the mainland, and phase out most of the heavy fuel oil-based power generation on the islands by 2030.Another policy, the National Climate Law, enacted in May 2022, set targets to achieve a 55% reduction in the total greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, an 80% reduction by 2040, and ultimately reach net zero emissions by 2050 [3].It also outlined the essential emissions reduction measures and set a binding target to end lignite power generation by 2028.
Energies 2024, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 26 development, further electric power generation from renewable energy sources (RESs) is needed.The Greek National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) aims to deploy renewable energy generation systems on the islands, interconnect them with the electricity grid on the mainland, and phase out most of the heavy fuel oil-based power generation on the islands by 2030.Another policy, the National Climate Law, enacted in May 2022, set targets to achieve a 55% reduction in the total greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, an 80% reduction by 2040, and ultimately reach net zero emissions by 2050 [3].It also outlined the essential emissions reduction measures and set a binding target to end lignite power generation by 2028.It is evident that the need for RESs to achieve energy transition in Greece is growing rapidly.According to the National Climate Law [3], the energy transition plan of Greece focuses on wind and solar PV.Therefore, it is very timely and topical to study Greece's wind and PV potential.While there are a plethora of studies about wind potential using the Geographic Information System (GIS) for Greece [6][7][8][9][10], relatively few studies, such as the one by Vagiona [11], have been conducted about the country's PV potential.
This work aims to explore the prospective wind and PV energy prospects in Greece by identifying the optimal locations for wind turbines and PV installations using geospatial data.The approach contrasts with those of previous studies [6,[8][9][10][11] in Greece, which did not incorporate economic criteria into the land eligibility analysis, thereby providing a more comprehensive evaluation of the viability of RESs.It also aims to compare the electric-generating capacity of the existing wind turbines and PV power plants at their present state with the predicted wind and PV potential to assess the most suitable RESs for Greece, either wind or solar.Recognizing their untapped value, while mining areas are normally excluded from such studies, special attention is dedicated to the potential of wind and PV in former lignite mining areas that could markedly increase the efficiency of RESs in Greece.This will not only broaden the scope of land use for energy production but also support the transition to sustainable development by turning neglected sites into productive assets.It is evident that the need for RESs to achieve energy transition in Greece is growing rapidly.According to the National Climate Law [3], the energy transition plan of Greece focuses on wind and solar PV.Therefore, it is very timely and topical to study Greece's wind and PV potential.While there are a plethora of studies about wind potential using the Geographic Information System (GIS) for Greece [6][7][8][9][10], relatively few studies, such as the one by Vagiona [11], have been conducted about the country's PV potential.
This work aims to explore the prospective wind and PV energy prospects in Greece by identifying the optimal locations for wind turbines and PV installations using geospatial data.The approach contrasts with those of previous studies [6,[8][9][10][11] in Greece, which did not incorporate economic criteria into the land eligibility analysis, thereby providing a more comprehensive evaluation of the viability of RESs.It also aims to compare the electric-generating capacity of the existing wind turbines and PV power plants at their present state with the predicted wind and PV potential to assess the most suitable RESs for Greece, either wind or solar.Recognizing their untapped value, while mining areas are normally excluded from such studies, special attention is dedicated to the potential of wind and PV in former lignite mining areas that could markedly increase the efficiency of RESs in Greece.This will not only broaden the scope of land use for energy production but also support the transition to sustainable development by turning neglected sites into productive assets.

Study Areas
Greece, a country located in southeastern Europe, consists of 13 regions with a total area of about 132,000 km 2 .By 2023, according to statistics [12], the total population of Greece was 10,497,595 inhabitants and, among the more than 2000 Greek islands, only about 170 islands were inhabited.Although many uninhabited islands host established nature reserves for flora and fauna, other areas that meet the designated standards are worthy of becoming sites of investment in renewable energy due to the abundance of wind and solar resources [10].Based on the Archaeological Cadastre of Greece [13], the current inventory reveals the presence of 220 museums, 420 historical sites, 844 protected areas, 3100 archaeological sites, and 17,000 monuments in the entire territory of the country.In the established network of nature protection areas in the European Union, Greece has a total of 446 protected areas, including 239 Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and 181 Special Protection Areas for birds (SPAs), with the remaining 26 areas falling into both categories [14].
In this work, the operations were based on a shapefile of Greece [15].Before the land eligibility analysis, Natura 2000 areas were excluded first according to SFSPSD-RES [16].In order to determine the land position that can support the construction of wind turbines and PV power plants in Greece, the open-source tool GLAES [17] and the Prior datasets containing typical criteria for variable RESs were utilized.A geographic analysis was conducted to assess the wind and solar potential in Greece.This analysis involved the utilization of the Digital Elevation Model of Greece obtained from the European Environment Agency Digital Elevation Model (EU-DEM) [18].Additionally, WPD data at a height of 100 m were obtained from the Global Wind Atlas [19], while GHI data were obtained from the Global Solar Atlas [20].These datasets were employed to compare the approximate wind and solar potential in Greece using a Geographic Information System digital platform, specifically ArcGIS 10.8 (Esri, Aylesbury, UK).

Current State Analysis
At present, Greece has established many wind and PV farms based on previous or recently designated standards.Data affecting the construction of wind turbines and PV power plants under the current conditions were analyzed to develop a series of land constraints for the suitable placing of wind turbines and PV power plants in Greece.Meanwhile, the data of 2023 from the Geoinformation Map of the Regulatory Authority for Energy [21] were used to present the existing construction areas of wind and solar energy.Subsequently, the areas with installed wind turbines and PV power plants were combined with the DEM map and mean WPD and GHI maps of Greece to understand the topography of the current construction locations and assess the current electric-generating capacity of Greece.

Geospatial Land Availability for Energy Systems (GLAES)
Land eligibility is a process that evaluates the suitability of a land parcel for implementing a specific technology based on a predetermined set of exclusion constraints and serves as a fundamental and widely utilized procedure through which geospatial criteria shape the distribution patterns across a given region [22].Since not all open fields are eligible for the installation of wind turbines and PV power plants, land eligibility analysis based on geospatial data is an essential step before analyzing RES potential.
GLAES is based on Python 3 language, providing a simple and efficient way to analyze land eligibility using the Prior datasets [17].Ryberg et al. [23] examined more than 50 literature sources that independently conducted a land eligibility analysis for prevalent variable RES technologies, documenting the approaches and frequencies used in defining the criteria.In this study, 28 typical criteria were identified, which included the distance from settlements and the distance from airports.Meanwhile, depending on the underlying motivations driving their exclusion, the identified criteria were divided into 4 distinct groups, namely, socio-political, physical, conservation, and economic.The typical criteria were further subdivided into multiple sub-criteria, for example, the exclusion distance from settlements is different for urban and rural areas.Finally, a collection of standardized datasets called Prior was developed [23], which defined common criteria related to variable RESs in the European context.There were 46 Priors in total, each of which represented the values of a criterion or sub-criterion across Europe and was georeferenced using the EPSG:3035 spatial reference system at a spatial resolution of 100 m by 100 m.The comprehensive documentation of each Prior dataset can be found in the work of Ryberg et al. [23].The GLAES model and the Prior datasets can be obtained via GitHub [17].The threshold of each criterion in the Prior datasets was determined considering the social, technical, environmental, and economic factors specific to Greece.These are discussed in Sections 2.4 and 2.5.

Onshore Wind Land Eligibility Analysis
For onshore wind energy, there are already many studies on land eligibility considering different series of land constraints.For instance, the European Environment Agency conducted a land eligibility analysis of onshore wind only excluding protected areas, such as Natura 2000, and found that the available area for onshore wind is 85.3% in Europe [24].In contrast, other studies opted to apply multiple land constraints to analyze land eligibility.McKenna et al. [25] and Eurek et al. [26] both selected agricultural areas, settlement areas, protected areas, forests, waterbodies, slope, and elevation as land constraints, although the set thresholds for each exclusion constraint were different.Eurek et al. [26] found that 40% of the area in Europe is eligible for wind energy.In comparison, in addition to the land constraints mentioned above, McKenna et al. [25] also excluded buffer areas around airports, harbors, roads, and railways and used higher resolution maps, revealing that 23% of land surface in Europe is eligible.Moreover, Ryberg et al. [27] reviewed 53 land eligibility studies to develop a set of common land constraints for Europe considering social, technical, environmental, and economic factors and found that the total eligible area amounts to 1,352,260 km 2 for onshore wind turbines in Europe overall, which includes an eligible area of 28,326 km 2 in Greece.However, according to the specific circumstances of different countries, there will be certain differences in the formulated exclusion criteria and thresholds.At the national level in Greece, a Special Framework for the Spatial Planning and the Sustainable Development of Renewable Energy Sources (SFSPSD-RES) was formulated, which in addition to considering common land constraints, such as settlements and protected areas, also excluded archaeological reserves and considered visual factors, i.e., the esthetic impact of wind turbines on the landscape [16].Several subsequent studies on wind farms' site selection in Greece were based on this framework.Tsoutsos et al. [7] conducted a study in Crete and found that 2517 km 2 on the island are available.Latinopoulos and Kechagia [8] also conducted a study in the region of Kozani based on SFSPSD-RES, but they excluded the areas where the average wind speed is below 4.5 m/s and the slope above 25%, concluding that there are 550 km 2 available for wind farms.
In this study, the series of land constraints that were used to analyze the land eligibility of onshore wind in Greece are summarized in Table 1.These were based on SFSPSD-RES, a previous study conducted in Greece [16], and a generalized land constraints list for onshore wind developed by Ryberg [27].In order to estimate the eligible area and distributions for onshore wind turbines, a reference wind turbine was used (Table 2).The parameters of this reference wind turbine correspond to the Vestas V136 wind turbines available at present and to technology changes for future wind turbines by 2050 [28].In the socio-political group of criteria, SFSPSD-RES set a safe distance to urban (population > 2000 inhabitants) and rural (population < 2000 inhabitants) settlements considering noise and safety factors that could cause a negative impact on society [33].At the same time, it clearly stipulated that wind turbines must be installed at least 1500 m away from touristic areas.For safety reasons, wind turbines should be installed at a distance from airports due to the possible interference with aviation radar signals [33].Also, they should be installed at a certain distance from roads, railways, and power lines, but to reduce transportation and transmission cost, the distance should not be too large [34].Land use covers, such as agricultural, industrial, and mining areas, were excluded in related studies of Greece [6][7][8].However, this work sought to explore the RES potential of deserted and decommissioned lignite mines in Greece without excluding mining sites.
In the physical group, slope was assessed as the third most significant factor affecting the construction of wind turbines in the study of Karamountzou and Vagiona [10].Less steep land provides a better access to construct and maintain wind turbines [33,35]; therefore, the present study excluded areas with slopes greater than 17 • .According to SFSPSD-RES [16], wind turbines are not allowed to be constructed in the areas of sand, wetland, and woodland and should be constructed 1500 m away from the coastline.Waterbodies and rivers are often covered by protected area status and are important for the functioning of biodiversity and ecosystems [36].Therefore, waterbodies and rivers were excluded in this work.
Natura 2000 areas are explicitly excluded by SFSPSD-RES.However, Natura 2000 status only includes protected bird and habitat areas.Considering the cultural environment and heritage protection of Greece, it is worth setting a certain exclusion threshold around protected natural monuments, parks, and landscapes [8].
In order not to reduce the performance and increase the cost of construction and maintenance of wind turbines, the study by Karamountzou and Vagiona [10] combined technology and economics to evaluate the criteria, and found four important economic criteria, one of which was slope and the remainder were wind velocity, access distance (the distance from accessible roadways), and connection distance (the distance from a power line).Wind speed is an extremely important factor affecting the operation of wind turbines.The wind turbine starts to work when the wind speed reaches a certain value, at which the wind speed is called cut-in speed [28].According to the power curve of the reference turbine, the cut-in speed is 4 m/s [28].Therefore, areas where the average wind speed is below 4 m/s were excluded.Under the condition of ensuring that the wind turbines are at a certain safe distance from roadways and power lines, the distance should not be too large, because it will lead to increased construction, maintenance, and electricity production and transmission costs [9,35].Finally, the thresholds for access and connection distance were determined based on the study by Ryberg et al. [27].

Open-Field PV Land Eligibility Analysis
While there are many studies on the land eligibility analysis of onshore wind, studies on the suitable construction of open-field PV power plants are relatively few.However, the analysis of land eligibility for PV in open areas adopts the analysis method of multi-criteria exclusion, considering the factors of society, technology, environment, and economy as well as that of onshore wind.A detailed study of European wind and solar energy potential by Ryberg [28] presented a consilient list that included 26 criteria that could be applied as exclusion constraints to select eligible areas for PV at the country level of Europe and found that the area eligible for open-field PV is 294,851 km 2 in Europe and the eligible area in Greece is 11,740 km 2 .Although these established exclusion criteria cannot be fully generalized for open-field PV studies in a specific country, it lays the foundation for related studies in Europe.Based on exclusion criteria listed by Ryberg [28], Tlili et al. [37] conducted a literature review [38] about the areas that need to be excluded for the construction of PV power plants in France and found that the potential area for PV in France is 40,694 km 2 .Likewise, on the basis of the general exclusion criteria list, Maestre et al. [39] reduced the threshold for some criteria, such as adjusting the distance from settlements areas from 200 m to 100 m, because the work was based on a hypothetical framework favorable to Spanish decarbonization goals between 2030 and 2050, and added some criteria in line with Spanish national conditions, such as historical sites.Finally, Maestre et al. [39] found that there was 143,820 km 2 eligible for open-field PV panels in Spain.Few studies have been conducted on the suitable sites of open-field PV in Greece.Vagiona [11] conducted a study on Rhodes Island (Greece), which considered 6 exclusion criteria, such as land cover, distance from protected areas, and altitude, based on SFSPSD-RES and showed that nine sites were eligible for open-field PV on Rhodes Island without mentioning the total eligible area.Unlike other studies [37,39], the criteria chosen for excluding land constraints in the study by Vagiona [11] did not include the slope and northward slope factors, which could lead to a poor performance of the PV panels due to shading [28].
Although the SFSPSD-RES of Greece provides exclusion criteria for wind turbines' construction and many related studies provide detailed land constraints and thresholds based on this framework, the exclusion criteria for PV power plants have not been elaborated.Therefore, in this section, the analysis of open-field PV land eligibility for Greece was mainly based on some criteria for the site selection of PV parks mentioned in the SFSPSD-RES and the detailed study by Ryberg [28] on analyzing PV potential in Europe (Table 3).Meanwhile, as Greece is very close to Turkey and the climate of the two countries is similar, this section combined relevant studies conducted in Turkey to provide a more informative analysis.Additionally, a specific PV panel (Table 4) was used as a reference to determine the eligible areas for open-field PV power plants and to model their distribution in decommissioned lignite mines.The selected PV panel offered the optimal representation of distribution, while ensuring the highest number of full load hours [28].Initially, according to SFSPSD-RES [16], the construction of PV parks is prohibited in areas of agriculture, wetlands, forests, natural monuments, protected landscapes, national parks, and Natura 2000 areas.
In the group of socio-political criteria, PV power plants should be built close enough to residential areas to provide a better energy demand and lower costs of electricity transmission without affecting the lives of residents [40].In order to avoid accidents caused by the reflection of PV panels, based on the study by Vagiona [10], airports and the surrounding area within 2000 m were excluded.Most studies [11,28,41,42] considered some land covers, such as operational industrial and mining areas, as exclusion criteria since activities on them can stain PV panels leading to an inefficient performance.The same applies for land eligibility for onshore wind; however, this study did not exclude mining sites.
In physical criteria, in addition to considering the overall terrain slope (steep terrain can increase the construction cost), the northward slope should be also considered, because the self-shading losses of PV panels can be significantly high even with only slightly northfacing slopes [28].Constructing PV power plants in high-altitude areas will increase the cost of the installation and transportation of materials; therefore, it is suggested to set the exclusion threshold of elevation to 1500 m [11].At the same time, in order not to pollute environmental water resources when constructing PV panels, Ryberg's study [28] suggested that waterbodies and surrounding areas up to 500 m should be excluded.According to several studies [41][42][43], since the topography and geological structure of sands and beaches are not suitable for constructing PV power plants, sandy and beach areas were excluded.
Two significant economic indicators were considered in this section, namely, connection distance (the distance to power lines) and access distance (the distance to accessible roads).It is suggested that PV power plants should be constructed as close as possible to power lines, since the farther away from the power lines, the higher the cost and loss of electricity power transmission [44].Moreover, it is also necessary to ensure that the distance between PV stations and the road is not too far, because a longer distance will increase the transportation cost of construction and the cost of operation and maintenance [45].In summary, based on Ryberg's study [28], this section excluded the areas that were more than 20 km away from power lines and more than 10 km away from roads.

Deserted Lignite Mine Potential
According to the NECP, the Greek government has set a goal to completely eliminate coal-fired power generation in the country by 2028 [46].Based on this plan, some lignite power stations, such as Kaida I and II as well as Amyndeo I and II, have been shut down since 2019 [47].However, for Greece, a country long dependent on lignite for power generation, such an ideal and complete energy transition is difficult.In order to stabilize the electricity power supply system for a future entirely powered by natural gas and RESs, five lignite-burning power stations in Agios Dimitrios, Meliti, and Megalopolis are scheduled to have their operations extended to 2025 by the Public Power Corporation (PPC) in Greece [48].It is obvious that the phasing out of lignite power generation is inevitable based on the energy transition plan of the Greek government.In the context of the shutdown of lignite-fired stations, lignite mines will be decommissioned, with potentially large areas without conservation value becoming available for other uses, such as renewable power generation.Meanwhile, there is an excellent connection to the power grid at these locations, which can be used by the newly installed PV parks.Therefore, it is important to analyze the RES potential of former lignite mines in Greece.In this section, a lignite mining site in Megalopoli (Figure 2) and two lignite mining sites in Ptolemaida (Figure 3) were chosen as the study areas.The Ptolemaida Mine of Western Macedonia located in the northern part of Greece is the largest lignite mine in the whole of Greece, followed by what is the largest lignite mine in the Peloponnese Peninsula of Southern Greece, the Megalopoli Mine [49].Due to the extension of operation at the Megalopoli lignite power station until 2025 and the expected closure of the Ptolemaida lignite power station in 2028, lignite mines in both regions are still in use.However, with the mandatory and inevitable shutdown of lignite power station in Megalopoli, the adjacent mine will be decommissioned in parallel, since lignite is not suitable for longdistance transport.
Without excluding mining sites using GLAES, this section aimed to explore the wind and solar energy potential in the mining areas of Megalopoli and Ptolemaida combined with WPD and GHI.Meanwhile, a reference wind turbine (Table 2) and solar panels (Table 4) were used to assess the renewable energy potential of these open-pit mines after their decommissioning.The separation distance for wind turbines was based on 8D × 4D, where D represents the rotor diameter of the turbine.The separation distance for PV parks was 1000 m.Energies 2024, 17, 567 10 of 26

Current State of Wind Turbines and PV Power Plants
Figure 4 shows the current distribution of installed wind turbines in Greece, with the areas featuring wind turbines highlighted in red.The total area occupied by wind turbines is 2095 km 2 , accounting for 1.5% of Greece's total land area.
and solar energy potential in the mining areas of Megalopoli and Ptolemaida combined with WPD and GHI.Meanwhile, a reference wind turbine (Table 2) and solar panels (Table 4) were used to assess the renewable energy potential of these open-pit mines after their decommissioning.The separation distance for wind turbines was based on 8D × 4D, where D represents the rotor diameter of the turbine.The separation distance for PV parks was 1000 m.

Current State of Wind Turbines and PV Power Plants
Figure 4 shows the current distribution of installed wind turbines in Greece, with the areas featuring wind turbines highlighted in red.The total area occupied by wind turbines is 2095 km 2 , accounting for 1.5% of Greece's total land area.By the end of 2022, the cumulative installed wind power capacity in Greece reached 4681.4MW [50].Wind turbines are predominantly distributed in Thrace, Western Macedonia, Central Greece, and the Peloponnese.Meanwhile, the altitude at which the wind farms were constructed is depicted in Figure 5a.The color of an area corresponds to its altitude, with high altitudes being represented by lighter shades and lower altitude by darker shades.The altitude values adhere to this color scheme in the subsequent diagrams related to DEM.Additionally, Figure 5b presents a WPD map combined with the locations of the existing wind farms.In this map, areas with a redder hue indicate higher mean WPD values, whereas areas with lighter shades of red correspond to lower mean WPD By the end of 2022, the cumulative installed wind power capacity in Greece reached 4681.4MW [50].Wind turbines are predominantly distributed in Thrace, Western Macedonia, Central Greece, and the Peloponnese.Meanwhile, the altitude at which the wind farms were constructed is depicted in Figure 5a.The color of an area corresponds to its altitude, with high altitudes being represented by lighter shades and lower altitude by darker shades.The altitude values adhere to this color scheme in the subsequent diagrams related to DEM.Additionally, Figure 5b presents a WPD map combined with the locations of the existing wind farms.In this map, areas with a redder hue indicate higher mean WPD values, whereas areas with lighter shades of red correspond to lower mean WPD values.It is worth noting that the majority of the wind turbines were installed at relatively high altitudes, as shown in Figure 5a, specifically on mountain ridges.These areas exhibit higher mean WPD values in Greece, as indicated in Figure 5b, and higher average WPD values signify more abundant and favorable wind resources [19].
values.It is worth noting that the majority of the wind turbines were installed at relatively high altitudes, as shown in Figure 5a, specifically on mountain ridges.These areas exhibit higher mean WPD values in Greece, as indicated in Figure 5b, and higher average WPD values signify more abundant and favorable wind resources [19].Figure 6 displays the current areas in Greece where PV parks have been constructed.The total land area occupied by PV parks is 1984 km 2 , accounting for 1.5% of the total land area of Greece.According to Petrova [51], the cumulative capacity of PV parks in Greece reached 5488 MWp in 2023.Meanwhile, it can be noted that the current PV parks are predominantly situated in Western Macedonia and Thessaly, where they are constructed on flat terrain with a relatively low elevation, as shown in Figure 7a.Since the GHI values can accurately quantify the solar energy potential for PV [52], higher GHI values correspond to a greater solar energy potential.Therefore, PV parks are strategically constructed in areas with relatively high GHI values, as shown in Figure 7b.

Onshore Wind Potential
As stated in Section 3.4, the Natura 2000 areas were excluded from the start of analysis.The remaining socio-political, physical, conservation, and economic constraints were excluded sequentially using GLAES (Figure 8).Upon the exclusion of the socio-political criteria, the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines in Greece was determined to be 44.58%.However, after excluding the physical criteria, the land eligibility ratio dramatically decreased to 16.21% and further dropped to 15.45% after excluding the conservation criteria.Finally, after excluding the economic criteria, the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines in Greece was determined to be 12.16%.Figure 8 clearly indicates that the physical criteria significantly impact the feasibility of constructing onshore wind turbines in Greece.Furthermore, among the economic criteria, the slope is the factor that most affects land eligibility; if the slope criterion is not excluded, land eligibility for onshore wind in Greece increases to 19.9%.

Onshore Wind Potential
As stated in Section 3.4, the Natura 2000 areas were excluded from the start of analysis.The remaining socio-political, physical, conservation, and economic constraints were excluded sequentially using GLAES (Figure 8).Upon the exclusion of the socio-political criteria, the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines in Greece was determined to be 44.58%.However, after excluding the physical criteria, the land eligibility ratio dramatically decreased to 16.21% and further dropped to 15.45% after excluding the conservation criteria.Finally, after excluding the economic criteria, the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines in Greece was determined to be 12.16%.Figure 8 clearly indicates that the physical criteria significantly impact the feasibility of constructing onshore wind turbines in Greece.Furthermore, among the economic criteria, the slope is the factor that most affects land eligibility; if the slope criterion is not excluded, land eligibility for onshore wind in Greece increases to 19.9%.To provide a visual representation of the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines, Figure 9 presents a map where the eligible area constitutes 16,055 km 2 , accounting for 12.16% of the total Greek area.Additionally, Figure 10 combines the predicted wind turbine locations with the mean WPD map of Greece.These figures demonstrate that the projected wind turbine sites are concentrated in Western Macedonia and Northern Thessaly, the eastern part of Central Greece, the Peloponnese, and the islands of Crete and Rhodes.As mentioned in Section 4.1, areas with a higher mean WPD are predominantly situated in mountainous regions with high altitudes.However, most eligible areas predicted by GLAES are distributed across flat terrain with relatively low mean WPD values.Only a few areas with a high mean WPD, such as the island of Crete and the junction area of the southern part of Central Greece and Attica, can support wind turbine construction.To provide a visual representation of the land eligibility for onshore wind turbines, Figure 9 presents a map where the eligible area constitutes 16,055 km 2 , accounting for 12.16% of the total Greek area.Additionally, Figure 10 combines the predicted wind turbine locations with the mean WPD map of Greece.These figures demonstrate that the projected wind turbine sites are concentrated in Western Macedonia and Northern Thessaly, the eastern part of Central Greece, the Peloponnese, and the islands of Crete and Rhodes.As mentioned in Section 4.1, areas with a higher mean WPD are predominantly situated in mountainous regions with high altitudes.However, most eligible areas predicted by GLAES are distributed across flat terrain with relatively low mean WPD values.Only a few areas with a high mean WPD, such as the island of Crete and the junction area of the southern part of Central Greece and Attica, can support wind turbine construction.1.
Energies 2024, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW Figure 9. Onshore wind land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table 1.

Open-Field PV Potential
The four categories of the exclusion criteria were successively excluded using GLAES, and the outcomes of each exclusion process are presented in Figure 11.Initially, the exclusion of the socio-political criteria resulted in 50.19% of the land being deemed eligible for open-field PV construction.However, this proportion drastically decreased to 7.71%, marking a reduction of 42.48%, when the physical criteria were excluded.The exclusion of the conservation criteria did not significantly impact the proportion of eligible land, with the value remaining at 7.44%.Finally, after excluding the economic criteria, the area suitable for PV power plants in open areas of Greece amounted to 4.67% of the country's total land area.Generally, physical criteria significantly influence the land eligibility for open-field PV power plants, with slope being the most important factor.Without excluding the slope criterion, the land eligibility for open-field PV increased to 18.17%.

Open-Field PV Potential
The four categories of the exclusion criteria were successively excluded using GLAES, and the outcomes of each exclusion process are presented in Figure 11.Initially, the exclusion of the socio-political criteria resulted in 50.19% of the land being deemed eligible for open-field PV construction.However, this proportion drastically decreased to 7.71%, marking a reduction of 42.48%, when the physical criteria were excluded.The exclusion of the conservation criteria did not significantly impact the proportion of eligible land, with the value remaining at 7.44%.Finally, after excluding the economic criteria, the area suitable for PV power plants in open areas of Greece amounted to 4.67% of the country's total land area.Generally, physical criteria significantly influence the land eligibility for open-field PV power plants, with slope being the most important factor.Without excluding the slope criterion, the land eligibility for open-field PV increased to 18.17%.

Renewables' Potential of Decommissioned Lignite Mines
The potential installation of wind turbines and PV panels in the lignite mining areas of Megalopoli (25 km 2 ), Ptolemaida I (134 km 2 ), and Ptolemaida II (57 km 2 ) was simulated  3.

Renewables' Potential of Decommissioned Lignite Mines
The potential installation of wind turbines and PV panels in the lignite mini of Megalopoli (25 km 2 ), Ptolemaida I (134 km 2 ), and Ptolemaida II (57 km 2 ) was sim

Renewables' Potential of Decommissioned Lignite Mines
The potential installation of wind turbines and PV panels in the lignite mining areas of Megalopoli (25 km 2 ), Ptolemaida I (134 km 2 ), and Ptolemaida II (57 km 2 ) was simulated using GLAES as the basis.The investigation employed a baseline wind turbine (Table 2) and a reference PV panel (Table 4) for the analysis.Table 5 presents the findings for wind turbines' and PV parks' placements, along with the respective annual energy potential.In the context of wind turbines, the Megalopoli Mine has a capacity of 34 turbines, possessing a total energy potential of 428 GWh annually.As for the Ptolemaida I Mine, it can accommodate 155 turbines, producing 1953 GWh of energy potential annually.Meanwhile, the Ptolemaida II Mine can host 61 turbines and is capable of producing 769 GWh of energy potential.Furthermore, the Megalopoli Mine can accommodate 21 PV parks, covering an area of 21 km 2 and generating an energy potential of 2324 GWh.The Ptolemaida I Mine can be covered by 102 PV parks, accounting for an area of 68.9 km 2 and yielding an impressive energy potential of 13,901 GWh annually.The Ptolemaida II Mine, on the other hand, has the capacity for 37 PV parks, covering an area of 22.1 km 2 with an energy potential of 4465 GWh per annum.
Overall, significantly, based on the results of the three lignite mines studied, the PV parks have an almost 7-fold greater potential for electric energy generation compared to wind turbines.A detailed breakdown of the distribution of the wind turbines and PV parks is provided in Section 4.2, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the comparative electric power generation potential of both technologies.

Comparison between the GLAES-Defined Eligible Areas with the Current State
Compared to previous studies [6,[8][9][10][11]16], this work incorporated wind speed, access, and connection distance directly into the exclusion criteria.Based on the land eligibility analysis conducted for onshore wind turbines and open-field PV power plants, it is evident that the area identified as eligible by the GLAES model was considerably larger than the areas presently developed for such use in Greece.Specifically, the land area deemed eligible for onshore wind turbines surpassed the extent of wind farms by 13,960 km 2 , while the eligible area for PV power plants exceeded the current coverage of PV parks by 4182 km 2 .These comparative findings emphasize the significant land capacity available for the deployment of wind and solar projects in Greece.
Figure 14 illustrates a spatial comparison between the areas suitable for wind turbines' construction according to GLAES and areas where wind turbines have already been installed.It is apparent that a significant number of predicted eligible areas are situated on low-elevation and flat terrain, which differs from the current state of wind turbines' placement.Notably, many wind turbines have been installed at high elevations, a practice not accounted for in the GLAES model.Nevertheless, the identification of unsuitable areas for wind turbine installation by GLAES does not imply that these areas are actually unsuitable for constructing wind turbines.While considering land constraints, the actual construction also needs to evaluate the wind energy potential of specific locations.Given that Greece exhibits a greater wind energy potential at higher elevations, the installation of wind turbines in such areas is justifiable.
Energies 2024, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 26 construction also needs to evaluate the wind energy potential of specific locations.Given that Greece exhibits a greater wind energy potential at higher elevations, the installation of wind turbines in such areas is justifiable.Furthermore, the land eligibility maps, which indicate the predicted suitability of land for onshore wind and open-field PV, were merged with the existing wind farms and PV parks, as shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively.Figure 15 reveals that a significant proportion, specifically 76.5% of the established wind farms, are situated in regions that were excluded from the onshore wind land eligibility analysis because of the terrain slope.Moreover, with potential implications for nature conservation, it was observed that 10.1% of wind farms have been constructed within Natura 2000 areas.Similarly, Figure 16 illustrates that 49.3% of the existing PV parks have been constructed in regions that were excluded by the land eligibility analysis for open-field PV installations.Additionally, 10.1% of these PV parks are situated in Natura 2000 areas.It should be noted that the reason for this can be attributed Greece's early initiative in the construction of wind farms, which date back to the early 1980s [53], before the implementation of Natura 2000.Additionally, the utilization of solar PV technology commenced in 2006 with the introduction of feedin tariffs [54].However, it was not until 2012 that a specific framework for the development of RESs in Greece, known as SFSPSD-RES, was proposed and implemented.Moreover, due to the later start in constructing PV power plants compared to wind turbines, the area covered by PV parks in the excluded regions is significantly smaller.Furthermore, the land eligibility maps, which indicate the predicted suitability of land for onshore wind and open-field PV, were merged with the existing wind farms and PV parks, as shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively.Figure 15 reveals that a significant proportion, specifically 76.5% of the established wind farms, are situated in regions that were excluded from the onshore wind land eligibility analysis because of the terrain slope.Moreover, with potential implications for nature conservation, it was observed that 10.1% of wind farms have been constructed within Natura 2000 areas.Similarly, Figure 16 illustrates that 49.3% of the existing PV parks have been constructed in regions that were excluded by the land eligibility analysis for open-field PV installations.Additionally, 10.1% of these PV parks are situated in Natura 2000 areas.It should be noted that the reason for this can be attributed Greece's early initiative in the construction of wind farms, which date back to the early 1980s [53], before the implementation of Natura 2000.Additionally, the utilization of solar PV technology commenced in 2006 with the introduction of feed-in tariffs [54].However, it was not until 2012 that a specific framework for the development of RESs in Greece, known as SFSPSD-RES, was proposed and implemented.Moreover, due to the later start in constructing PV power plants compared to wind turbines, the area covered by PV parks in the excluded regions is significantly smaller.
this can be attributed Greece's early initiative in the construction of wind farms, which date back to the early 1980s [53], before the implementation of Natura 2000.Additionally, the utilization of solar PV technology commenced in 2006 with the introduction of feedin tariffs [54].However, it was not until 2012 that a specific framework for the development of RESs in Greece, known as SFSPSD-RES, was proposed and implemented.Moreover, due to the later start in constructing PV power plants compared to wind turbines, the area covered by PV parks in the excluded regions is significantly smaller.

Comparison of the Wind and Solar PV Energy Potential in the Mining Areas under Study
Figure 17 depicts the distribution of wind turbines in conjunction with the mean WPD for each mining area.Additionally, Figure 18 illustrates the distribution of PV parks combined with the mean GHI in each lignite mine.Although there is potential for constructing additional wind turbines in decommissioned lignite mines, it should be noted that the wind energy potential of the three mining areas may not surpass the solar energy potential when comparing Figures 17 and 18.This observation is supported by the WPD and GHI maps for the entire country.The data revealed that the average WPD for Greece is 797 W/m 2 [19], whereas the average GHI is 1550 kWh/m 2 [20].Interestingly, Figure 17 clearly illustrates that the WPD peaks of the three lignite mines correspond to low-value areas within the whole area of Greece, with values of 245.965W/m 2 , 265.881 W/m 2 , and 318.608W/m 2 , which are significantly lower than the average WPD.Furthermore, it is evident that there are only a few wind turbines situated in the regions with the peak WPD values of each mine, with a mere total of 15 wind

Comparison of the Wind and Solar PV Energy Potential in the Mining Areas under Study
Figure 17 depicts the distribution of wind turbines in conjunction with the mean WPD for each mining area.Additionally, Figure 18 illustrates the distribution of PV parks combined with the mean GHI in each lignite mine.Although there is potential for constructing additional wind turbines in decommissioned lignite mines, it should be noted that the wind energy potential of the three mining areas may not surpass the solar energy potential when comparing Figures 17 and 18.This observation is supported by the WPD and GHI maps for the entire country.The data revealed that the average WPD for Greece is 797 W/m 2 [19], whereas the average GHI is 1550 kWh/m 2 [20].Interestingly, Figure 17 clearly illustrates that the WPD peaks of the three lignite mines correspond to low-value areas within the whole area of Greece, with values of 245.965W/m 2 , 265.881 W/m 2 , and 318.608W/m 2 , which are significantly lower than the average WPD.Furthermore, it is evident that there are only a few wind turbines situated in the regions with the peak WPD values of each mine, with a mere total of 15 wind Although there is potential for constructing additional wind turbines in decommissioned lignite mines, it should be noted that the wind energy potential of the three mining areas may not surpass the solar energy potential when comparing Figures 17 and 18.This observation is supported by the WPD and GHI maps for the entire country.The data revealed that the average WPD for Greece is 797 W/m 2 [19], whereas the average GHI is 1550 kWh/m 2 [20].Interestingly, Figure 17 clearly illustrates that the WPD peaks of the three lignite mines correspond to low-value areas within the whole area of Greece, with values of 245.965W/m 2 , 265.881 W/m 2 , and 318.608W/m 2 , which are significantly lower than the average WPD.Furthermore, it is evident that there are only a few wind turbines situated in the regions with the peak WPD values of each mine, with a mere total of 15 wind turbines having been observed.On the contrary, the extreme GHI values in the three lignite mines all exceed the average value of GHI for the entire region of Greece, amounting to 1707.5 kWh/m 2 , 1577.2 kWh/m 2 , and 1593.2 kWh/m 2 , as shown in Figure 18.Notably, the peak GHI areas of the Megalopoli Mine and the Ptolemaida II Mine contain four PV parks each, while almost all PV parks are concentrated in the extreme GHI area of the Ptolemaida I Mine.For robust verification, this study conducted a comprehensive examination by consolidating the electric energy potential WPD values achievable from wind turbines and the electric energy potential GHI values achievable from PV panels, revealing that the potential of electric generation by PV panels in the three lignite mines significantly surpasses that of wind turbines.The results from Table 5 further confirm that the potential of wind energy in the three lignite mines is lower than that of solar PV.Therefore, it is concluded that the total potential of solar PV in the lignite mines of Megalopoli, Ptolemaida I, and Ptolemaida II is 20,690 GWh, which is almost 7-fold greater than that (3150 GWh) of wind.
However, PV fields with such a high peak power output as the ones that can be built on the areas of the three lignite mines from this study could be a critical component in the electricity grid of Greece.Daily and seasonal variations in electricity production need to be smoothed by employing means for the storage of electricity, e.g., hydrogen or thermal energy storage.The seasonal storage of renewable energy using hydrogen involves capturing excess energy during the times of high renewable generation, such as sunny or windy days, and converting it into hydrogen through electrolysis.This hydrogen can then be stored for extended periods, i.e., several months, serving as a clean and efficient energy carrier.During low renewable energy periods, like calm or cloudy days, the stored hydrogen can be utilized in fuel cells natural-gas-fired power stations to generate electricity, providing a reliable energy source.This approach addresses the intermittency of renewable sources, enabling a more consistent and sustainable power supply throughout the year.Additionally, the deployment of hydrogen in seasonal storage contributes to the decarbonization of the energy sector by offering a versatile solution for large-scale energy storage and distribution.What is more, the study of Schmidt et al. [55] showed that, for a few load cycles per year, hydrogen storage is more cost effective than using batteries.Another promising option for storing surplus renewable electrical energy is the application of the so-called Carnot batteries, which can store large amounts of energy in the form of high-temperature heat in inexpensive materials, such as water, stone, or molten salt, and are much cheaper than batteries [56].In conjunction with seasonal heat storage systems, they can store heat energy for months.The size, capacity, and energy management of Carnot batteries can be adapted to the specific demand, i.e., the capacities of several megawatts are expected to be available from 2030 onwards.
In general, at the regional level in Greece, the potential for open-field PV is greater than that of onshore wind.It is safe to assume that the potential is even greater when roof areas, parking sites, and industrial areas are included (as they should be).At the same time, although the adoption of PV power generation in Greece came after wind power generation, a recent report indicated that the total installed PV capacity has exceeded the total installed wind capacity for Greece in 2022 [57].Additionally, the abundance of sunshine in Greece allows for less restricted operations of PV power plants.In contrast, wind turbine operations face more complex limitations.For instance, low wind speeds generally make the installation of wind turbines unviable, while wind speeds that are too high necessitate the shutdown of wind turbines for their protection.Moreover, the construction of wind farms generally entails higher material and financial costs compared to that of PV power plants [57]-the cost of photovoltaic energy has declined by about 90% over the last decade, resulting in a remarkable 30% growth per year [58].Furthermore, the focus on PV power plants will potentially allow for the further enhancement of biodiversity conservation in Greece.This is because the current focal areas for wind power production (Thrace, Western Macedonia, Central Greece, and the Peloponnese as well as, overall, the higher elevation areas) are regions of potentially high biodiversity value [59].A focus on PV power production provides an opportunity for the Natura network of protected areas to expand further in those regions.In conclusion, the combination of the present analysis and considering the wider efficiency, economic, and biodiversity protection factors, this study concluded that solar energy (PV) is better suited than wind power for the decarbonization efforts of Greece.
Last but not least, a very important advantage of the proposed use of decommissioned lignite mining areas is that no valuable agricultural land is consumed for the generation of renewable electric energy.

Limitations
Based on the SFSPSD-RES of Greece, this study incorporated land eligibility analysis for onshore wind and open-field PV, combining insights from previous relevant research conducted in Europe, particularly in Greece.In order to assess land suitability, a comprehensive list of land constraints was formulated, encompassing social, technological, environmental, and economic factors.By imposing exclusion land constraints using GLAES, the areas eligible for constructing wind turbines and PV power plants were obtained.However, it is important to note that the land eligibility analysis, based solely on the current policies and previous empirical studies, can only provide indicative results.The overall process of constructing renewable energy system entails complex aspects that must be considered.These include assessing the potential of RESs, evaluating construction costs, and analyzing topographic and geological conditions specific to the target area.Further investigations can be carried out to examine the discrepancy between the estimated suitability areas for wind turbines and the wind turbines actually built (see Figure 5).Especially on mountain tops, the wind potential is systematically underestimated when using averaged wind speed data, as shown in the study by Hu et al. [60].In a future study, the effect of topology at the sub-grid level will be included in the land suitability analysis.
Additionally, it is crucial to secure the support and involvement of local residents and stakeholders, among other relevant considerations.Consequently, the successful implementation of wind turbines and PV power plants necessitates not only model simulations but also thorough field investigations, which together enable optimizing electric power generation efficiency and minimizing costs to ensure the utmost effectiveness of renewable energy generation.
With the phasing out of lignite mines in Greece, there is a significant opportunity to construct renewable energy systems in decommissioned lignite mines.However, there are certain limitations in constructing wind turbines and PV power plants in these mining areas.Geotechnical stability, slopes, and landslides, for Example, should be considered during construction [61].Moreover, this study compared the potential of wind energy and solar PV energy in Greece, specifically focusing on decommissioned lignite mines.The analysis mainly utilized the WPD and GHI maps of Greece for discussion.It should be noted that there is no direct relationship between WPD and GHI values; rather, they serve as reference indices for estimation proposes.The electric power output of wind energy and solar PV predominantly depends on their respective power capacities.Therefore, this work used a reference wind turbine and a reference PV panel to estimate the number of constructable turbines and the area for PV parks so that the energy potential can be calculated under ideal conditions.Finally, it was found that the PV energy potential significantly surpassed that of wind energy in the decommissioned lignite mines under study.It is essential to recognize that the estimated potential represents a technically possible maximum.The exploitable potential may be substantially lower due to practical, ecological, or technological limitations (which cannot be addressed in this work).Detailed site-specific studies are imperative for a realistic assessment.
Furthermore, a comprehensive calculation of electric generation is an intricate process that necessitates the consideration of numerous factors.In the case of wind energy, the power generation capacity is determined by climatic factors, such as air density and temperature, as well as physical factors, like wind speed and the spatial and temporal variations in wind patterns.Similarly, the power generation capacity of solar PV is influenced by climatic parameters, like air quality and sunshine hours, in addition to physical factors, such as solar irradiance in combination with atmospheric conditions.Overall, the calculation of wind energy and solar PV energy capacities for the whole territory of Greece is an intricate and challenging task, thus representing a limitation.

Conclusions
In the context of Greece's energy transition dominated by wind and solar energy, this work assessed the land eligibility of onshore wind turbines and open-field PV power plants to provide insights of reference for their suitable construction.Meanwhile, the electric generation potential of the two RESs in the decommissioned lignite mines of Megalopoli and Ptolemeida were specifically compared to further discuss the most suitable RESs for Greece, either wind or solar.This work concluded that solar (PV) energy in Greece has a greater potential of electricity generation than that of wind energy.Considering only land eligibility during optimal conditions, Greece's 132,032 km 2 of suitable areas for PV could generate an electricity of 205 TWh, significantly surpassing the country's total electricity consumption of 52.8 TWh in 2020 provided by International Energy Agency.And in decommissioned lignite mines, while wind turbines appear unsuitable for electricity generation, PV systems have significant potential.Moreover, it is worth mentioning that a joint venture between the German utility RWE and Public Power Corp. (PPC) of Greece is already constructing solar projects, named Amynteo Cluster I and II, with a total capacity of 210 MWp and 280 MWp, respectively, in the former Amynteo open-pit lignite mine of Western Macedonia [62].
Through the land eligibility analysis of onshore wind turbines and open-field PV power plants using GLAES, it was found that Greece has significant land potential for both compared to the current state.It is worth noting that the construction locations of wind turbines modeled using GLAES is quite different from the current installations.Most of the current wind turbines are located at high altitudes with a high wind energy potential, which is contrary to the predicted results.Additionally, although the eligible area for wind turbines (12.16%) is much larger than that of PV power plants (4.67%), a significant proportion of the predicted eligible land for wind turbines is located in low electric generation potential areas, especially in the studied lignite mining areas.Meanwhile, this study made a start to analyze the land eligibility for both the onshore wind and openfield PV of Greece and compared the electric energy potential of wind and solar power.In general, the successful construction of wind turbines and PV power plants not only needs to be based on model predictions considering socio-politics, technology, the environment, and economy, but also requires a thorough field investigation of the target construction areas.Moreover, the most direct way to compare the potential of wind and solar energy sources is to calculate their electric power capacity.However, due to the complexity of the calculation, which needs to consider many climatic factors, this work did not conduct the calculation, thus remaining a limitation.Overall, this work provided meaningful references for the construction of wind turbines and open-field PV power plants for Greek decarbonization.Notably, part of the wider significance of this study lies in the estimation of the potential of renewable energy available by using the areas of three decommissioned lignite mines, which is in the order of magnitude of the electricity produced by gas in 2020 in all of Greece.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Electric power generation by variable sources in Greece from 1990 to 2020 [5].

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Electric power generation by variable sources in Greece from 1990 to 2020 [5].

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Location and region of the Megalopoli lignite mine.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Location and region of the Ptolemaida lignite mine.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Location and region of the Megalopoli lignite mine.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Location and region of the Megalopoli lignite mine.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Location and region of the Ptolemaida lignite mine.Figure 3. Location and region of the Ptolemaida lignite mine.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Location and region of the Ptolemaida lignite mine.Figure 3. Location and region of the Ptolemaida lignite mine.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Currently installed wind farms' area in Greece.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Currently installed wind farms' area in Greece.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) The current wind farms combined with the DEM map of Greece.(b) Mean WPD map of Greece with the installed wind farms, where the blue areas indicate the areas with wind turbines.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) The current wind farms combined with the DEM map of Greece.(b) Mean WPD map of Greece with the installed wind farms, where the blue areas indicate the areas with wind turbines.

Figure 6
Figure6displays the current areas in Greece where PV parks have been constructed.The total land area occupied by PV parks is 1984 km 2 , accounting for 1.5% of the total land area of Greece.According to Petrova[51], the cumulative capacity of PV parks in Greece reached 5488 MWp in 2023.Meanwhile, it can be noted that the current PV parks are predominantly situated in Western Macedonia and Thessaly, where they are constructed on flat terrain with a relatively low elevation, as shown in Figure7a.Since the GHI values can accurately quantify the solar energy potential for PV[52], higher GHI values correspond to a greater solar energy potential.Therefore, PV parks are strategically constructed in areas with relatively high GHI values, as shown in Figure7b.

Figure 6 .Figure 7 .
Figure 6.Areas of the currently installed PV parks in Greece.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Areas of the currently installed PV parks in Greece.

Figure 6 .Figure 7 .
Figure 6.Areas of the currently installed PV parks in Greece.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) The current PV parks combined with the DEM map of Greece.(b) Mean GHI of Greece with the installed PV parks, where the blue areas indicate the areas with PV parks.Figure 7. (a) The current PV parks combined with the DEM map of Greece.(b) Mean GHI of Greece with the installed PV parks, where the blue areas indicate the areas with PV parks.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Land eligibility prediction process for onshore wind in Greece.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Land eligibility prediction process for onshore wind in Greece.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Onshore wind land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table1.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Predicted onshore wind turbine areas with the mean WPD map, in which blue areas indicate the areas with predicted wind turbines.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Onshore wind land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table1.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Predicted onshore wind turbine areas with the mean WPD map, in which b indicate the areas with predicted wind turbines.Figure 10.Predicted onshore wind turbine areas with the mean WPD map, in which blue areas indicate the areas with predicted wind turbines.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Predicted onshore wind turbine areas with the mean WPD map, in which b indicate the areas with predicted wind turbines.Figure 10.Predicted onshore wind turbine areas with the mean WPD map, in which blue areas indicate the areas with predicted wind turbines.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Land eligibility prediction process for open-field PV in Greece.

Figure 12
Figure 12 illustrates a map displaying the eligible areas for open-field PV power plants as predicted by GLAES.The total eligible area in Greece encompasses 6166 km 2 , accounting for 4.67% of the country's total land surface.The predicted open-field PV power plant locations are predominantly on flat terrain.Moreover, Figure 13 clearly shows the relatively high mean GHI values in the eligible areas, particularly in the southern regions of Greece, such as the Peloponnese and the islands of Crete and Rhodes.These regions present peak GHI values, indicating the substantial solar energy potential of openfield PV installations in the predicted eligible land areas.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Land eligibility prediction process for open-field PV in Greece.

Figure 12
Figure 12 illustrates a map displaying the eligible areas for open-field PV power plants as predicted by GLAES.The total eligible area in Greece encompasses 6166 km 2 , accounting for 4.67% of the country's total land surface.The predicted open-field PV power plant locations are predominantly on flat terrain.Moreover, Figure 13 clearly shows the relatively high mean GHI values in the eligible areas, particularly in the southern regions of Greece, such as the Peloponnese and the islands of Crete and Rhodes.These regions present peak GHI values, indicating the substantial solar energy potential of open-field PV installations in the predicted eligible land areas.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Open-field PV land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table3.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Predicted open-field PV area with the mean GHI map, in which blue areas indicate the areas with PV power plants.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Open-field PV land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table3.

Energies 2024 ,Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Open-field PV land eligibility excluding the land constraints from Table3.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Predicted open-field PV area with the mean GHI map, in which blue areas ind areas with PV power plants.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Predicted open-field PV area with the mean GHI map, in which blue areas indicate the areas with PV power plants.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Current wind farms and predicted wind turbine areas shown in the DEM map of Greece.

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.Current wind farms and predicted wind turbine areas shown in the DEM map of Greece.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Unsuitable areas for wind turbines' construction and the existing wind farms in Greece.White areas present the eligible land, while gray areas present the unsuitable land.Green areas and red areas, respectively, stand for Natura 2000 sites and the current wind farms.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.Unsuitable areas for the construction of PV power plants and the existing PV parks in Greece.White areas present the eligible land, while gray areas present the unsuitable land.Green areas and red areas, respectively, stand for Natura 2000 sites and the current PV parks.

Figure 17
Figure17depicts the distribution of wind turbines in conjunction with the mean WPD for each mining area.Additionally, Figure18illustrates the distribution of PV parks combined with the mean GHI in each lignite mine.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 15 . 26 Figure 15 .
Figure 15.Unsuitable areas for wind turbines' construction and the existing wind farms in Greece.White areas present the eligible land, while gray areas present the unsuitable land.Green areas and red areas, respectively, stand for Natura 2000 sites and the current wind farms.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.Unsuitable areas for the construction of PV power plants and the existing PV parks in Greece.White areas present the eligible land, while gray areas present the unsuitable land.Green areas and red areas, respectively, stand for Natura 2000 sites and the current PV parks.

4. 2 . 26 Figure 16 .
Figure17depicts the distribution of wind turbines in conjunction with the mean WPD for each mining area.Additionally, Figure18illustrates the distribution of PV parks combined with the mean GHI in each lignite mine.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.(a) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 17 . 26 Figure 16 .
Figure 17.(a) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.(a) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of wind turbines with the WPD map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.(a) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.(a) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Megalopoli Mine.(b) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida I Mine.(c) Simulated placements of PV parks with the GHI map of the Ptolemaida II Mine.

Table 1 .
Land constraints for onshore wind turbines.

Table 2 .
[28]ary of the parameters of the reference wind turbine[28].

Table 3 .
Land constraints for open-field PV.

Table 5 .
The predicted placements of wind turbines and PV parks along with the energy potential of both in the lignite mines of Megalopoli and Ptolemaida I and II.