Next Article in Journal
Environmental Policy vs. the Reality of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Top Emitting Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection Method of Crack Defects in Butt Joints of Multi-Layered Steel Vessel for High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Gas-Steam CHP Plants Without and with Heat Accumulator and HTGR Reactor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Steam Reforming Process by Hydrogen Generator, Using PHAST Model

by
Jongseok Lee
,
Hyunjun Kwak
and
Seungho Jung
*
Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(22), 5704; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225704
Submission received: 11 September 2024 / Revised: 7 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety of Hydrogen Energy: Technologies and Applications)

Abstract

This study applied a risk assessment technique to the steam reforming process in hydrogen production facilities to generate baseline data for preparing safety protocols in related workplaces. To this end, consequence analysis (CA) was conducted using DNV-PHAST v.8.9., focusing on the reforming process, which operates at the highest temperature and pressure among related processes. This study predicted jet fire damage resulting from the total failure of a 65 mm syngas pipe at the rear end of the reformer, with a projected flame length of up to 23.6 m based on a radiant heat of 5 kW/m2. As per the assessment, a vapor cloud explosion (VCE) caused damage of up to 42.6 m at an overpressure of 0.07 bar (1 psi), while a flash fire had an impact range of approximately 12.7 m based on hydrogen’s LFL (lower flammable limit). This quantitative risk assessment of the general steam reforming process provides valuable basic data for the design and operation of related facilities.
Keywords: hydrogen; steam reforming process; quantitative risk analysis; PHAST; jet fire; vapor cloud explosion; flash fire; consequence analysis hydrogen; steam reforming process; quantitative risk analysis; PHAST; jet fire; vapor cloud explosion; flash fire; consequence analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Kwak, H.; Jung, S. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Steam Reforming Process by Hydrogen Generator, Using PHAST Model. Energies 2024, 17, 5704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225704

AMA Style

Lee J, Kwak H, Jung S. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Steam Reforming Process by Hydrogen Generator, Using PHAST Model. Energies. 2024; 17(22):5704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225704

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jongseok, Hyunjun Kwak, and Seungho Jung. 2024. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Steam Reforming Process by Hydrogen Generator, Using PHAST Model" Energies 17, no. 22: 5704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225704

APA Style

Lee, J., Kwak, H., & Jung, S. (2024). Quantitative Risk Assessment of Steam Reforming Process by Hydrogen Generator, Using PHAST Model. Energies, 17(22), 5704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225704

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop