Recent Progress on Emerging Applications of Hydrochar

: Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a prominent thermochemical technology that can convert high-moisture waste into a valuable product (called hydrochar) at a relatively mild treatment condition (180–260 ◦ C and 2–10 MPa). With rapidly growing research on HTC and hydrochar in recent years, review articles addressing the current and future direction of this research are scarce. Hence, this article aims to review various emerging applications of hydrochars, e.g., from solid fuel to soil amendment, from electron storage to hydrogen storage, from dye adsorption, toxin adsorption, heavy metal adsorption to nutrient recovery, and from carbon capture to carbon sequestration, etc. This article further provides an insight in the hydrochar’s working mechanism for various applications and how the applications can be improved through chemical modiﬁcation of the hydrochar. Finally, new perspectives with appropriate recommendations have been made to further unveil potential applications and its improvement through hydrochar and its modiﬁed version.


Introduction
The United States produces >12% of the world's wastes alone although it is home to only 4% of world's total population [1].These wastes contain significant carbon material, which has become the center of active research since conversion of such waste carbon material can synthesize value-added product [2,3].Of several established conversion technologies, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has become the center of interest because it can transform wet feedstock (as high as 70-90% moisture) without pre-drying/pretreatment and the solid hydrochar yield can be as high as 35-65%, while the rest of them are liquid and gas [4,5].As evident in Figure 1, the research on HTC and hydrochar has increased by more than 2-3 times in 2021 since 2017.Hence, it has become equally important to understand the recent progress on emerging scenarios of HTC and hydrochars.
The HTC process employs elevated subcritical temperature (180-350 • C) and autogenous pressure [6,7], which disintegrate organic wastes [6,8].As the temperature increases in HTC, the biopolymer bonds break [9,10] while the water molecules easily penetrate through the porous structure of the solid and decompose the biomass by dissolution and pyrolysis reactions [6,7,11].Therefore, the modification of solid waste through HTC and varying HTC condition synthesizes hydrochar equipped with the number of useful applications, e.g., solid fuel [12,13], hydrogen energy storage [14,15], water purification [16,17], soil amendment [18], toxin adsorption [19], electrochemical device [20], catalyst support [21], and carbon sequestration [22], etc.Although hydrochars have been attempted as highervalue applications such as water purification, carbon capture, energy storage, and electron storage, concern remain about their efficacy since they do not consist of the high porosity or surface area that are important for higher-value applications [23][24][25][26][27][28].Chemical modification of hydrochars has been revealed as valuable since it could overcome the structural limitation and enhance the efficacy of various applications.
Energies 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW attempted as higher-value applications such as water purification, carbon capture, e storage, and electron storage, concern remain about their efficacy since they do not c of the high porosity or surface area that are important for higher-value application 28].Chemical modification of hydrochars has been revealed as valuable since it overcome the structural limitation and enhance the efficacy of various applications This review article discusses the current applications of hydrochar and modifi drochar, working mechanisms, and the impact of varying HTC conditions and hyd modification conditions on the efficiency.This review gives a broad perspective on hydrochar, and modified hydrochar and narrows down to a fundamental understa of their application.Finally, the emerging applications to date have been presented would provide an important future direction of hydrochar study.

Solid Fuel and Combustion Properties of Hydrochar
Table 1 shows the fuel and combustion properties of select waste biomass-d hydrochars at different HTC conditions.The HTC conditions are varied from 180-3 5 min-24 h, and 1:5-1:25 (solid: water w/w ratio) to synthesize energy-dense fuel [6, The 0.5 h reaction time is reported as sufficient since the greatest extent of HTC re occurs within that specific period of time [32].The elemental hydrogen-to-carbon (H/C) and elemental oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O/C) of raw feedstocks vary between 2.11 and 0.73-0.88for lignocellulose, and 0.12-2.10 and 0.38-0.90for non-lignocel respectively.It is observed that the H/C and O/C ratios for hydrochars vary between 1.58 and 0.19-0.75for lignocellulose, 0.94-1.77and 0.15-0.81for non-lignocellulos 0.82-1.54and 0.12-0.72 for combined lignocellulose:non-lignocellulose, respectivel HTC decreases the H/C and O/C ratios for both lignocellulosic and non-lignocel hydrochars; however, the reduction is more prominent for the combined lignoc sic:non-lignocellulosic hydrochars.This is expected since HTC for a single feedsto ates an acidic environment through dehydration (formation of H2O) and decarboxy reactions (formation of CO2 or carbonyl or carboxylic acids) [33][34][35][36] and thereby, th and O/C ratios drop.However, in case of combined lignocellulose:non-lignocel HTC (also known as Co-HTC), one feedstock can act as a nucleation site for anot found by Saba et al. [37] for coal-miscanthus blend HTC, which further augment densation and polymerization of carbon-dense organics from process liquid to the h char's surface [36,38].Xu et al. [39], on the other hand, showed that in the case of Co This review article discusses the current applications of hydrochar and modified hydrochar, working mechanisms, and the impact of varying HTC conditions and hydrochar modification conditions on the efficiency.This review gives a broad perspective on HTC, hydrochar, and modified hydrochar and narrows down to a fundamental understanding of their application.Finally, the emerging applications to date have been presented which would provide an important future direction of hydrochar study.

Solid Fuel and Combustion Properties of Hydrochar
Table 1 shows the fuel and combustion properties of select waste biomass-derived hydrochars at different HTC conditions.The HTC conditions are varied from 180-300 • C, 5 min-24 h, and 1:5-1:25 (solid: water w/w ratio) to synthesize energy-dense fuel [6, 30,31].The 0.5 h reaction time is reported as sufficient since the greatest extent of HTC reaction occurs within that specific period of time [32].The elemental hydrogen-to-carbon ratio (H/C) and elemental oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O/C) of raw feedstocks vary between 0.12-2.11and 0.73-0.88for lignocellulose, and 0.12-2.10 and 0.38-0.90for non-lignocellulose, respectively.It is observed that the H/C and O/C ratios for hydrochars vary between 0.80-1.58and 0.19-0.75for lignocellulose, 0.94-1.77and 0.15-0.81for non-lignocellulose, and 0.82-1.54and 0.12-0.72 for combined lignocellulose:non-lignocellulose, respectively.The HTC decreases the H/C and O/C ratios for both lignocellulosic and non-lignocellulosic hydrochars; however, the reduction is more prominent for the combined lignocellulosic:nonlignocellulosic hydrochars.This is expected since HTC for a single feedstock creates an acidic environment through dehydration (formation of H 2 O) and decarboxylation reactions (formation of CO 2 or carbonyl or carboxylic acids) [33][34][35][36] and thereby, the H/C and O/C ratios drop.However, in case of combined lignocellulose:non-lignocellulose HTC (also known as Co-HTC), one feedstock can act as a nucleation site for another, as found by Saba et al. [37] for coal-miscanthus blend HTC, which further augments condensation and polymerization of carbon-dense organics from process liquid to the hydrochar's surface [36,38].Xu et al. [39], on the other hand, showed that in the case of Co-HTC of polyvynyl chloride (PVC) and cotton textile waste, the surface -OH and C=O groups of hydrochar propagate C-Cl bonds and promote HTC through dehydration/aromatization reactions.In response, the solid hydrochar shows relatively higher carbon composition than hydrogen or oxygen.It was also observed that increasing HTC temperature increases the O/C and H/C ratios more, since the dehydration and decarboxylation reactions improve at a higher extent [6].The lower H/C ratio also indicates higher aromatic compounds in hydrochar [40].As suggested by the Van Krevelen diagram [41,42], the fuel quality of any solid is better if the fuel consists of lower H/C and O/C ratios.For example, walnut shell showed the lowest H/C ratio while tobacco stalk showed the lowest O/C ratio suggesting higher dehydration/demethylation reactions and decarboxylation/dehydration reactions, respectively [37].In case of non-lignocellulose, the waste textile showed the lowest H/C while straw powder showed the lowest O/C.The HHVs reported in Table 1 also support the trend of O/C and H/C ratios for all types of feedstocks.For example, the HHV shows the lignocellulosic, non-lignocellulosic, and combined lignocellulosic:non-lignocellulosic hydrochars culminate to as high as 28.2, 27.0, and 27.6 MJ/kg, respectively, approaching the fuel quality of coal [43].Orange peel shows the highest heating value, while sewage sludge shows the poorest heating value [44,45].This is expected since sewage sludge experiences significant accumulation of ash at the expense of high volatiles after HTC, whereas orange peel experiences significant volatile loss which compliments to a significant increase in fixed carbon [44,45].Since ash is an inorganic substance, it does not burn but, in fact, reduces the burning capacity, resulting in an overall drop in HHV [46].
The fuel ratio in Table 1 varied between 0.18-1.72 for lignocellulose, 0.09-1.03for non-lignocellulose, and 0.22-1.22 for combined lignocellulose:non-lignocellulose.This gives an indication on the relative combustion behavior of the biomass.Table 1 shows that the ignition and burnout temperatures for lignocellulose reach as high as 371.3 • C and 750 • C, 388.8 and 832.9 • C for non-lignocellulose, and 354.9 • C and 585.3 • C for combined lignocellulose:non-lignocellulose, respectively.However, the raw feedstocks show 287.1 • C and 329.9 • C for lignocellulose and non-lignocellulose, respectively.In case of the combustibility index, the lignocellulose shows 12.3; however, the non-lignocellulose shows as high as 337.For Co-HTC, it shows 9.3 as the maximum combustibility index.It has been found that volatiles in the biomass first convert into pyrolysis gas as soon as those get exposed to the heat flux, which then react with surrounding oxygen and this phenomenon continues as the surface gets exposed more and more to the heat flux [47].Liu et al. [48] also supported that lower volatiles in hydrochars make those more stable (supported by lower ignition and burnout temperature), and therefore, they show a less vigorous reaction (as the lower combustion index suggests in Table 1) than raw biomass.Lower volatiles also suggest less of a fire hazard risk than raw biomass [48,49].In the case of Co-HTC, it is possible that both feedstocks show a synergistic effect on synthesizing stable fixed carbon that augments the thermal stability of the hydrochars.As an example (in Table 1), orange peel shows higher thermal stability than any other lignocellulose, whereas corn stover shows a longer burning time with a higher burnout temperature.Orange peel also shows >44% fixed carbon [45]; however, corn stover shows up to 32% only [50].However, in the case of Co-HTC, Lin et al. [51] showed that increasing the composition of waste wood, waste paper, and waste food relative to waste textiles decreases the ignition temperature but increases the burnout temperature, resulting in an increased thermal stability and combustion, possibly due to increasing fuel ratio and ash composition.Overall, it has been found that the investigation of Co-HTC has increased by 3.6 times from 2017 to 2021 [29], which could be an emerging future study in upcoming years.

Water Purification Using Hydrochar and Modified Hydrochar
Figure 2 shows an overview of hydrochar in the application of dye, heavy metal, and toxin removal from water.Therefore, a review of recent advances on these applications is warranted and further discussed below.Grape marc and cow manure (3:1-1:3) 220

Water Purification Using Hydrochar and Modified Hydrochar
Figure 2 shows an overview of hydrochar in the application of dye, heavy metal, and toxin removal from water.Therefore, a review of recent advances on these applications is warranted and further discussed below.

Recent Advances on Dye Adsorption by Hydrochar
Hydrochar as an adsorbent material for the treatment of dye-contaminated water has proven to be an efficient and economical viable resource [64].As such, studies have shown the adsorption performance of hydrochar with various dye types (cationic/anionic), with most in favor of cationic dyes (methylene blue, rhodamine b, methyl green) rather than anionic dyes (methyl orange, acid red 1) [65].

Recent Advances on Dye Adsorption by Hydrochar
Hydrochar as an adsorbent material for the treatment of dye-contaminated water has proven to be an efficient and economical viable resource [64].As such, studies have shown the adsorption performance of hydrochar with various dye types (cationic/anionic), with most in favor of cationic dyes (methylene blue, rhodamine b, methyl green) rather than anionic dyes (methyl orange, acid red 1) [65].
Table 2 shows the research findings of the adsorption performance, isotherm, and mechanisms of hydrochar derived from various feedstocks for treating different dyecontaminated solutions under similar batch sorption conditions.Table 2 introduces hydrochar adsorbent with low surface porosity (S BET : 5-50 m 2 /g) reporting relatively low maximum adsorption capacity (Q max ) between 30 and 71 mg/g [16,[65][66][67].It is observed that the adsorption mechanisms for the mentioned hydrochars were similar with chemical interactions between the char surface and dye molecules due to surface functionality being the dominating influence for the removal.Thus, as hydrochar presents minimal surface porosity, adsorption is compensated for based on the surface oxygen containing functional groups.However, studies have discovered ways to improve the dye Q max by performing post-modification of hydrochar and altering the physico-chemical properties [68].From Table 2, some post-modifications presented are acid etching, chemical activation, one-pot synthesis, Co-HTC, ozone treatment, magnetic modification, and functionality doping (amine, carboxylate, nitrogen, polyamine carboxylate) which significantly improved the Q max (47-5181 mg/g) [24][25][26][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88].As presented in Table 2, Tran et al. [65] performed a study on glucose-activated hydrochar derived from spherical hydrochar functionalized with triethylenetetramine for adsorption application where spherical hydrochar was used as the control.Consequently, with further modifications of the spherical hydrochar, ~1200% and ~640% increases in Q max were reported for methyl green 5 and acid red 1 removal, respectively.Similarly, Ferrentino et al. [67] investigated sewage sludge hydrochar as an option for methylene blue contaminated wastewater treatment in which comparative analysis between hydrochar and chemically activated hydrochar was performed.The study showed that by mixing the sewage sludge-derived hydrochar with KOH, about a 250% increase in Q max could be observed due to the enhanced surface functionality.
In summary, it is observed that for hydrochar, the dominant adsorption mechanisms are chemical interactions, as active binding sites are made available through the HTC process.As for the modified hydrochar, complex adsorption mechanisms are present such as pore filling, electrostatic attraction, and chemical interactions, playing dominant roles, driving the higher uptake of dye.

Heavy Metals Removal from Water by Hydrochar and Activated Hydrochar
The Table 3 shows the heavy metal adsorption performance by various hydrochars and activated hydrochars derived from different lignocellulosic and non-lignocellulosic feedstocks at different HTC and modification conditions.Our review has narrowed down to most common heavy metals, e.g., Pb 2+ , Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , Cd 2+ , and Ni 2+ , where Pb 2+ stood out as the most toxic metal, as per the World Health Organization [89].Hence, removal of these heavy metals from water in an eco-friendly way is warranted and treatment by hydrochar is considered a sustainable solution [90].The HTC is performed at 200-300 • C, 0.5-24 h, and 1.5:1-1:10 solid-water ratio to synthesize hydrochar [82,[91][92][93][94][95].The hydrochars possess a high BET surface area which plays a role in heavy metal adsorption.For example, avocado seed hydrochar having a 40.5 m 2 /g BET surface area shows 9.4-24.9mg/g for Ni 2+ , Cu 2+, and Pb 2+ ions at 25 • C and it further increases by as high as 2 times with increasing adsorption temperature [90].It is also hypothesized that surface functional groups (phenolic and carboxylic) interact with multiple metallic ions at once, while Van der Waals and physical attraction are responsible for endothermic monolayer adsorption [90].Rice straw hydrochars show 16 times more Cu 2+ adsorption capacity than avocado seed due to high oxygen containing functional groups, rough surface, and higher pore volume, although having 60.5% lower BET surface area [91].
However, further modification of hydrochar could also be a potential route for better heavy metal removal.In an effort by Nadarajah et al. [96], rice straw hydrochar modified by FeCl 3 showed 11% higher BET surface area and 4% higher Pb 2+ and Cu 2+ removal, possibly due to a change in band intensities of oxygen-containing functional groups that contribute to surface complexation and spontaneous endothermic adsorption.In another study, the hydrochar produced via the HTC process of peanut hull feedstock with water at 300 • C and 5 h showed 16 times increased lead ion adsorption capacity where the isotherm diverted from Freundlich to Langmuir after modification with 10% H 2 O 2 solution indicating the introduction of homogeneity in the surface [92].Xue et al. [92] reported a significant rise in the carboxyl functional group after modification, which adsorbed the metal ions through a surface exchange reaction like surface complexation.The modified hydrochar was further used for a multi-metal adsorption test in the presence of Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , Cu 2+ , Ni 2+ ions where its removal ability showed a trend of Pb 2+ > Cu 2+ > Cd 2+ ~Ni 2+ [92].For the glucose-activated carbon (GAC), ion exchange between the adsorbent and the MG5 played a key role in adsorption.As for AR1, the hydrogen bonding interactions between the nitrogen-and oxygen-containing functional groups on the dye and the GAC was responsible for the adsorption. [65] Corn Stover RhB DW 230 -MB uptake was mainly attributed to the electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, π-π interaction, and intra-particle diffusion due to the functional groups and porous structure present in AHC (activated hydrochar). [69] Golden shower MG5 190  to electrostatic interaction at acidic/alkaline conditions [69].π -π interaction, electrostatic attraction, and hydrogen bonding between MB and the carboxylate-functionalized hydrochar (CFHC) were the main mechanisms for MB removal [72].Π-π interaction, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction dominated MB capture between the polyaminocarboxylated modified hydrochar (ACHC) with MB [87].
[ Langmuir For the N-doped hierarchical carbons, the adsorption performance was credited to the synergistic effects of high surface areas, hierarchical pores and pyrrolic N in the structure. [26] * HTC; ** activation; DW-DI water; MB-Methylene Blue; MO-Methyl Orange; MG5-Methyl Green 5; AR1-Acid Red 1.
Energies 2022, 15,9340 Modified and activated bamboo powder hydrochar shows the Langmuir isotherm for Cu 2+ removal and supports spontaneous endothermic adsorption via electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, and chelation attraction of metal ions with surface oxygen-containing functional groups [82,83].Li et al. [82] further showed that a 20 • C increase in the adsorption temperature can improve the adsorption capacity of Cu 2+ by up to 3%.Corn cob hydrochar, if modified by acidic and alkaline treatment followed by polyethyleneimine, can uptake up to 2-10 times more Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , and Pb 2+ [93,97,98].Although corn cob does not show a satisfactory BET surface area, researchers agreed that the possible reason for enhanced adsorption could be: (1) -N-Zn/Cu (II) complex formation and electrostatic interaction of -NH 3 + & -NO 3 − ions with metals; (2) oxygen (carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) and nitrogen-containing functional groups promoting ion exchange and hydrogen bonding.Alkali treatment was also found to remove blocked pores and improve surface area for Cr 6+ ion adsorption by corn cob, corn straw, and eucalyptus sawdust [98].Modification with nitrates and urea influenced the co-ordination effect induced by N 2 in the surface, surface co-precipitation, and electrostatic interaction in Pb 2+ adsorption by sewage sludge, although rigorous studies are yet to be conducted because of its significant variability in heterogeneity and moisture content [95].A case of mixed feedstocks, e.g., straw and poultry litter, was reported by Ghanim et al. [94], which reported acid modification can yield a similar adsorption capacity for Cr 6+ like Khushk et al. [98] but the mechanism is driven by redox reactions, ion exchange, and electrostatic interactions with Cr 6+ [94].− ions with metals contributed to ion adsorption Metal ions were adsorbed by acid-PEI-HC, and nitrogen chelation was primarily in control.However, the adsorption process for alkali-PEI-HC also involved groups that contained oxygen.
It can be concluded that hydrochars found from HTC are good for heavy metal removal from water [90,91].However, further modification of the hydrochars with acids, alkaline, and oxidizers improve the heavy metal removal efficiency by increasing oxygen-containing functionalities [96,99].The oxygen-containing functionalities are important because they drive the surface complexation reaction with the heavy metal ions and eliminate them from water [96,99].It is also observed that not only surface complexation but also physical attraction via Van der Waals and electrostatic force may influence the adsorption [90,95].

Toxin Removal from Water by Hydrochars and Activated Hydrochars
Table 4 shows the adsorption of pharmaceuticals and organic toxic compounds by hydrochars and modified hydrochars.With the increasing population resulting in greater emission of organic components from personal care products to pharmaceuticals, the ineffective removal record by conventional wastewater depuration treatments has raised serious concerns for the environment and human health subsequently [100,101].Therefore, this review on toxin removal attempts to summarize the effectiveness of using low-cost hydrochar and its modified version.The most common toxin used in pharmaceutical and personal care products is narrowed down to paracetamol, triclosan, ibuprofen, diclofenac, tetracycline, and bisphenol, etc. Diclofenac stood out first as it is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine used as a painkiller, an anti-arthritic, a treatment for women's menstruation pain all over the world, and readily passes through the nanofiltration equipment in the water treatment plant due to its negative charge [102].Table 4 suggests most of the studies focused on lignocellulosic feedstocks possibly due to their homogeneity, readily availability, and higher capacity for toxin adsorption [103,104].For example, the olive mill hydrochar shows a 2% increase in the BET surface area with increasing temperature that plays a role in toxin removal [105]; however, <43% removal was obtained for ibuprofen and >98% removal was obtained for ibuprofen triclosan, possibly due to the higher water solubility of ibuprofen and higher hydrophobicity of triclosan, which occupies most of the adsorption site and limits site for other toxins [105].Qureshi et al. [106] showed the highest adsorption for diclofenac, having a BET surface area of 1160 m 2 /g of hydrochar from the fruit powder of Zizipus mautitian, and hypothesized that the removal of the toxins shows physical attraction via the pore-filling mechanism in a monolayer & multilayer adsorption and fits well with the Dubinin-Raduskevich isotherm.In another study, hydrocar from olive stones shows efficient removal for diclofenac via film diffusion and intraparticle diffusion of the toxin molecules [104].Pauletto et al. [107] showed that avocado seed hydrochar removes 2-Nitrophenol (562.37 mg/g) via a greater surface cavity and electrostatic interaction, even though it has a relatively lower BET surface area.Hydrochar from Saccarum ravnnae removes 2 times more diclofenac, 2.5 times more ibuprofen, and 3 times more naproxen than the hydrochar from Saccarum officinarum [108], indicating rapid hydrogen bonding, π-π interaction, and electrostatic interactions [108].As reported by Liu et al. [109], hydrochar from watermelon peel shows up to 2 times more 2,4-dichlorophenoxy adsorption with increasing temperature, whereas lettuce and taro hydrochar's toxin removal efficiency drop by 13% and 168%, respectively.The adsorption for these hydrochars is mostly driven by chemisorption and partitioning where the mesoporous structure of the adsorbent and C-O surface functional group plays a significant role [109].In another study, tomato and olive press waste, rice husk, and horse manure hydrochars adsorbed 10 different toxins found in wastewater, where horse manure and rice husk chars showed 100% removal of diclofenac and bisphenol, possibly due to higher surface area along with the hydrophobic, electrostatic, and polar attraction with hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and polar toxins [110].
It is evident that hydrochar acts as effective adsorbent material via physical adsorption; however, incorporating chemisorption through electrostatic interaction, π-π interaction, and oxygen-rich functionalities may be improved by advanced treatment like activation, post treatment, etc.For example, nitrogen-activated palm kernel shell hydrochar results in 6 times greater BET surface area with diclofenac uptake of 13.16 mg/g where an increase in the carboxyl functional group accelerated the removal of a toxin by forming a hydrogen bond and π-π interaction with aromatic rings [102].A similar trend was reported by Mestre et al. [103], where the BET surface area of sucrose hydrochar after activation in steam, K 2 CO 3 , and KOH improves by 69-200% [103].Further research on KOH and K 2 CO 3activated hydrochar revealed that KOH-activated hydrochar removes 1.1-and 5.6-times more paracetamol and iopamidol, respectively, than K 2 CO 3 -activated hydrochar due to its greater surface area and micropore volume [103].Pine fruit shell after being activated with NaOH shows up to a 24% increase in the BET surface area and up to 5-14% higher bisphenol adsorption than lower-temperature HTC hydrochar [111].Adsorption isotherm is best fitted for the Liu model, indicating that the toxin is adsorbed at several active sites with diverse energies by physical adsorption, H-bonding, electrostatic attraction, and π-π interaction [111].Poplar sawdust hydrochar after activation via air and N 2 (300-700 • C) to adsorb tetracycline reports a 42-fold increase in BET surface area for N 2 activation at 500 • C and an 82-fold increase for O 2 activation at 500 • C but a decrease of up to 10% for O 2 activation at 700 • C, as the micropore might shift to mesopore [112].O 2 -activated hydrochar at 500 • C with the highest surface area shows the highest uptake of tetracycline (32 times greater than hydrochar and 9 times greater than N 2 activated at 700 • C) through micropore filling, π-π interaction, electrostatic interaction, and hydrogen bonding [112].As reported by de Araújo et al. [113], adsorption of acetaminophen on KOH-activated Brewer's spent grain has an around 156-times higher surface area with higher micropores than hydrochar that accelerates the toxin uptake quality via hydrogen bond interaction between -O-H of activated hydrochar and N-H groups of acetaminophens, π-π interaction between aromatic rings of adsorbent and toxin [113].Rice husk hydrochar with alkaline and acidic activation to adsorb berberine chloride and tetracycline shows a higher surface area for HNO 3 -activated hydrochar and higher removal of toxins by homogenous distribution of oxygen-rich functional groups after modification [114].Electrostatic attraction is one of the possible mechanisms for greater removal of tetracycline by H 3 PO 4-treated hydrochars with a negative surface, and three factors of surface area, functional groups, and surface charge might work together to provide the maximum adsorption capability of berberine chloride on KOH-treated hydrochar [114].In another study of carbamazepine adsorption on steamactivated flax shives and oat hull, hydrochar produced in acidic and alkaline solution shows 600-2800 times greater BET surface area than raw flax shives and oat hull, which after H 3 PO 4 activation, eventually results in a higher removal of both toxins through increasing hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups and interconnections between π-electron donors and acceptors [115].In an experimental finding reported by Fernandez et al. [116], orange peel hydrochar modified in CO 2 , air, and H 3 PO 4 at a different temperature range shows a 1.5%, 3%, and 4% increase in BET surface area, respectively, after the modification that influences the adsorption of diclofenac, salicylic acid, and flurbiprofen though mesoporosity and hydrogen bonding.Hydrochar modified in H 3 PO 4 is the most effective at removing toxins due to its greater BET area and mesopore volume making it easier for the aromatic molecule to approach the adsorption site and form a hydrogen bond [116].Finally, a study conducted on a paper board mill to remove diclofenac reported having around a 2.7-times greater BET surface area that increases the toxin intake by up to 10% after the activation in KOH [117].Both physisorption and chemisorption control the toxin removal mechanism via electrostatic interaction with the positively charged surface, hydrophobic effect of the toxin, Van der Waals force, and higher oxygen rich functional groups after the activation [117].
The review on toxin removal demonstrates the adsorption efficiency of hydrochar which can be further improved after certain modification or activation.Without the modification, the adsorption of toxins on the hydrochar surface is mostly regulated by physical attraction and texture of the surface area [104,106,107] along with Van der Waals force, π-π interaction, and hydrogen bonding [108,110], whereas modification and activation show an increase in the surface area along with a greater amount of the oxygen-containing functional group in the surface, resulting in a higher adsorption of toxins [103,[113][114][115][116][117].It is motivating to observe that much of the research is focusing more on the HTC activation instead of HTC alone for better toxin removal.* HTC; ** activation; S/W = solid-to-water ratio.

Greenhouse Gas Adsorption by Activated Hydrochar
Figure 3 shows the application of hydrochar for greenhouse gas adsorption.Incessant anthropogenic emission of greenhouse gas (GHG), primarily constituted by carbon dioxide and methane, has resulted in global climate change with the grave consequence of threatening species extinction.This has motivated the scientific community to develop inexpensive adsorbents, to reduce the levels of CH 4 and CO 2 with capture technologies, based on sustainable biomass sources.Hence, in the process of developing functional adsorbents, hydrochars have successfully provided an avenue, as activation of such hydrochars have resulted in superior porosity and functionality, owing to the excellent capability of hydrochars to offer pore initiation while having a surface rich in surface functionalities.Pioneered by Fuertes and Sevilla [118], chemical activation of hydrochars resulted in a higher surface area than their conventionally activated counterparts, while hydrochars were demonstrated to be highly functional with a large amount of oxygen-containing groups [119].Hence, the favorable characteristics of deriving porous activated hydrochars to be employed in GHG emission is extensively reviewed in the following subsections.
Energies 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 44 inexpensive adsorbents, to reduce the levels of CH4 and CO2 with capture technologies, based on sustainable biomass sources.Hence, in the process of developing functional adsorbents, hydrochars have successfully provided an avenue, as activation of such hydrochars have resulted in superior porosity and functionality, owing to the excellent capability of hydrochars to offer pore initiation while having a surface rich in surface functionalities.Pioneered by Fuertes and Sevilla [118], chemical activation of hydrochars resulted in a higher surface area than their conventionally activated counterparts, while hydrochars were demonstrated to be highly functional with a large amount of oxygen-containing groups [119].Hence, the favorable characteristics of deriving porous activated hydrochars to be employed in GHG emission is extensively reviewed in the following subsections.

CO2 Adsorption
As kinetic diameter, an indication of the size of the molecule, is unique for each adsorbate, in the case of CO2, a literature review corresponding to the activated hydrochars used as CO2 adsorbents, as listed in Table 5 with the dominating factor highlighted, summarizes the adsorption of the acidic gas CO2 as being closely associated with surface porosity as well as surface chemistry, where the latter factor has more driving influence in adsorption at a higher temperature (for example, 50 °C) than at a lower temperature [120].On the other hand, adsorption of CO2 at a low pressure is governed by the pore-filling mechanism.In this mechanism, the pore walls interact with the adsorbate molecules and drive the adsorption process.This signifies the importance of small micropores for enhancing the interactions of the overlapping potential fields from the neighboring pore walls and hence, results in higher CO2 capture.Hence, pores lower than 1 nm in size present in activated hydrochars demonstrate substantially higher CO2 capture at sub-atmos-

CO 2 Adsorption
As kinetic diameter, an indication of the size of the molecule, is unique for each adsorbate, in the case of CO 2 , a literature review corresponding to the activated hydrochars used as CO 2 adsorbents, as listed in Table 5 with the dominating factor highlighted, summarizes the adsorption of the acidic gas CO 2 as being closely associated with surface porosity as well as surface chemistry, where the latter factor has more driving influence in adsorption at a higher temperature (for example, 50 • C) than at a lower temperature [120].
On the other hand, adsorption of CO 2 at a low pressure is governed by the pore-filling mechanism.In this mechanism, the pore walls interact with the adsorbate molecules and drive the adsorption process.This signifies the importance of small micropores for enhancing the interactions of the overlapping potential fields from the neighboring pore walls and hence, results in higher CO 2 capture.Hence, pores lower than 1 nm in size present in activated hydrochars demonstrate substantially higher CO 2 capture at sub-atmospheric to ambient-atmospheric pressure, as observed in literature [121][122][123][124][125]. The importance of pore size distribution is imperative where, for example, Matabosch Coromina et al. [121] derived the optimum pore size of 0.5-0.7 nm, Liu et al. [126] derived the optimum pore size of 0.37-0.53nm, where Guo et al. [122] concluded optimum micropore size distribution to be 0.5-1.0nm, indicating the research gap of statistically correlating the effect of different pore size ranges on the CO 2 uptake capacity.Moreover, micropore proportion, also termed microporosity, is a crucial metric, concluded in the literature [121][122][123][127][128][129][130] and available in Table 5, as that can signify the fraction of pores that are capable of capturing CO 2 successfully, instead of the traditionally believed surface porosity metric of specific surface area (SSA) and pore volume.For example, Huang et al. [129] demonstrated one of the highest CO 2 uptakes, recorded in Table 5, as 4.83 mmol/g at 1 bar and 298 K, which was primarily attributed to the narrow micropore's volume.Conversely, the role of surface area has a discrepancy in the literature, as reviewed by Rouzitalab et al. [131].Although a high surface area provides high adsorption sites [132,133], which might facilitate the physical adsorption process, Guo et al. [122] derived a 16.7% reduction of CO 2 uptake, from 4.2 mmol/g to 3.5 mmol/g, despite achieving a higher surface area in the latter.It can be therefore be hypothesized that with the increase of surface area, if the pore size is enlarged, the interaction of CO 2 with the pore walls is reduced, which might result in lower CO 2 uptake.Hence, it might be pivotal to have a sufficiently high surface area consisting of appropriately sized pores.On the other hand, for CO 2 adsorption at elevated pressure, the likely mechanism of CO 2 adsorption is surface coverage and a combination of large micropores/small mesopores-macropores benefit the CO 2 captured, as meso/macro pores improve the CO 2 mass transportation within the porous carbon skeleton [134][135][136][137][138]. For example, Sevilla et al. [118] also demonstrated the necessity of pores in the micro-mesopore range, termed as the bimodal porosity, that helped in achieving the highest ever reported CO 2 adsorption capacity of 21 mmol/g in porous carbons at 25 • C and at a high pressure of 20 bar.
On the other hand, despite sufficient studies emphasizing the role of surface porosity, the additional influence of surface chemistry on CO 2 adsorption is scarcely studied and correlated to its uptake capacity.For example, Ghuangzhi et al. [139] studied the effect of HTC on the surface functionality of the derived porous carbons and investigated its performance as CO 2 adsorbent, but there was no obvious correlation between the variables found.However, Sarwar et al. [140] indicated superior CO 2 adsorption in KOH-activated porous carbons due to the 'basic nature' of the porous activated hydrochar.In light of that, functional groups such as pyridinic-N could enhance the adsorption performance of CO 2 , as it has the ability to donate a lone pair of electrons, resulting in the alkalinity of the adsorbent surface, whereas richness with other nitrogen-containing functional groups such as amine-or imine-N, pyrrolic-N, quaternary-N, and graphitic-N can benefit by a stronger chemisorption effect for CO 2 adsorption [141].To augment the quantity of such functional groups, the introduction of nitridizing agents (for example, melamine, ethylenediamine, or urea) is a novel approach where this can be incorporated in the step of the HTC [129,130] or during the step of activation of hydrochar [127].As a result, the microporous activated hydrochars' relative percentage of pyrrolic-N was significant where urea-nitridized tobacco stalk-derived activated hydrochar exhibited the highest atmospheric CO 2 uptakes of 4.83 mmol/g at 25 • C and 7.35 mmol/g at 0 • C [129].The same nitridizing agent, while hydrothermally carbonizing glucose, upon activation, demonstrated a CO 2 adsorption ability of 4.26 and 6.70 mmol/g at 25 • C and 0 • C, respectively [130].While both the research studies highlighted the significance of nitrogen functionality, the simultaneous high N content of the porous activated hydrochars were also attributed to superior CO 2 uptake in addition to the synthetic effect of narrow micropores being emphasized equally.Moreover, despite the significance of surface porosity and functionality in activated hydrochars, augmented by the utilization of hydrochar as a precursor of activation, only a couple of studies highlighted the role of HTC conditions on CO 2 uptakes.For example, both Parshetti et al. [142] and Guangzhi et al. [139] concluded the favorability of an HTC temperature of 240-250 • C as those hydrochars resulted in surface roughness, high C content, and C-groups that resulted in superior activated hydrochar properties (diverse functionalities and largest microporosity).However, despite preliminary research of different activated hydrochars as adsorbent materials revealing different adsorption capacities, which mostly stemmed from the combined effect of the different quantity and type of functional groups present in the adsorbent as well as the favorable surface porosity discussed above, it also consolidates the existing research gap of assessing the effect of other HTC conditions on porosity and functionality and determining the true dominating factor, either surface porosity or chemistry, for the performance of CO 2 adsorption.
The fitting of adsorption isotherms to various models demonstrated the Toth isotherm model to describe adsorption accurately at lower and higher pressure [140] where Freundlich was demonstrated to be a great fit for adsorption isotherms in the low to high temperature range (0, 25, and 50 • C) at atmospheric pressure [120,140,142].The Toth model factor lay between 0.5 < n t ≤ 1.5 whereas the value of 'n F ' in the Freundlich model was higher than 1 and lying in the range of 1 < n F < 10 [120,138,142].A greater fit to these models can be combinedly said to hint at the possibility of the favorable multilayer physical adsorption mechanism of CO 2 within the surface of the activated hydrochar along with interaction between adsorbed CO 2 molecules.However, similarly, the mechanism of adsorption due to surface doping is hence warranted.Moreover, from the thermodynamic perspective, the nature of the interplay of CO 2 as the adsorbate and porous activated hydrochar as adsorbent is reflected in the heat of adsorption where the relatively lower range of 19-24 kJ/mol [128,131,142,143] signifies the promising possibility of such porous activated hydrochars as competitive adsorbents in CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) applications.Moreover, the heat of adsorption is also affected by N-doping where a higher heat of adsorption 30.7-44 kJ/mol [129,130] has been reported, which highlights employing such N-rich adsorbents for CO 2 removal from a dilute stream, whereas the values are way below the energy of covalent bonds for chemisorption which makes an energy penalty during desorption.[126] # adsorption at 15 • C; * volumetric CH 4 uptake capacity (v/v); SSA: Specific surface area; V T : Total pore volume; V u : Micropore volume.

CH 4 Adsorption
As tabulated in Table 5, CH 4 uptake is reviewed to be demonstrated at 273-298 K both at low (1 bar) and high pressure (up to 36.5 bar) in model compound derived hydrochars which underwent varied post-HTC treatment, ranging from activation with ZnCl 2 , K 2 CO 3, and KOH to pyrolysis using N 2 , CO 2, and NH 3 .Considering the critical molecular size of CH 4 to be 0.38 nm, it can be speculated that CH 4 is more prone to be adsorbed in a double layer fashion [148].In terms of surface porosity, CH 4 uptake at low pressure is favored by narrow micropore size distribution where monomodal size distribution centered below 0.8 nm (0.4-0.7 nm) enhances CH 4 adsorption [126,148].It is also supported by simulation of CH 4 adsorption on an ideal porous graphite, which revealed the optimum pore size to be 0.8 nm for the highest density of CH 4 adsorbed where theoretically 7 mmol g −1 could be adsorbed at 1000 kPa [150].On the other hand, a large surface area in addition to considerable micropore volume favors methane uptake at high pressure [147,151,152].
For example, Correa et al. [153] similarly derived a high adsorption capacity of methane 4.5 mmol/g at 16 bar in the produced activated hydrochars with the increased BET surface area of 1351 m 2 /g and a micropore volume of 0.42 cm 3 /g.Moreover, high packing density is also a considerable factor to enhance the volumetric uptake of CH 4 [148].
Adsorption isotherm modelling by Pourebrahimi et al. [146] highlighted the possibility of methane adsorption to be cooperative adsorption with the heterogeneity of such activated hydrochars' surface expressed through the isotherm fitting of the Freundlich model.However, the three-parameter Sips model, a combination of Langmuir and Freundlich models, was demonstrated to be a better fit (R 2 > 0.99) in the same study, possibly reflecting both mono and multi-layer adsorption.Unfortunately, in another study of F. Liu et al. [126], the authors only applied a Sips model to fit adsorption isotherms without the correlation coefficient mentioned, and rather compared the affinity constant b (kPa −1 ) for adsorbateadsorbent interaction in cases of CH 4 and N 2 to establish superior selectivity of methane in the activated hydrochars.From the thermodynamics perspective, the heat of adsorption ranges from 11 to 17 kJ/mol, implying the occurrence of physisorption [149].Additionally, the adsorption heat typically decreases with the increase in CH 4 uptake, revealing that such activated hydrochars' surface is energetically heterogeneous for adsorption of CH 4 [153][154][155].Liu et al. [126] revealed the heat of adsorption to be 26-30 kJ/mol which could be ascribed to the phenomenon of both physisorption and some chemisorption occurring, where during the synthesis process, utilization of NH 3 introduced N corresponding to favorable pyrrole-N as the major functional groups on the surface of the activated and KMNO 4 treated hydrochars.Conversely, the detrimental effect of mineral doping was revealed by Wedler et al. [147] where Fe doping resulted in the increase of the structural order during subsequent pyrolysis of the doped hydrochars, leading to less accessible adsorption sites on the surface of the char and hence, decreased methane adsorption capacity.However, more investigation on the role of surface porosity and functionality, heteroatom, and mineral constituents' composition in methane uptake capacity for activated hydrochars is thus warranted, with the necessity of assessing the effect of various HTC process conditions on its derived activated hydrochars' characteristics.

Hydrochar as Catalyst Support
Research has highlighted the potential use of a biomass-derived carbon-catalyst reaction where the carbon can be synthesized via HTC technique, resulting in hydrochar with active polar oxygenated functionalities [156].Hydrochars are hence observed to be employed as a catalyst support in the heterogeneous catalysts, as listed in Table 6.However, for its role as an acidic catalyst, the key step to improve the acidic sites on carbon is achieved when the carbon is treated with a chemical agent, such as H 3 PO 4 , H 2 SO 4 , HCl, or HClSO 3 to improve its acidic sites [157,158].Konwar et al. [159] shed light on the desired characteristics of a solid-acid catalyst which comprise high concentration of acidic sites, stability, and resistance to variations in pressures and temperatures.Hydrochar-derived carbon materials belong to a small group that have at least two of those traits, as is the case for sulfonic groups (-SO 3 H) functionalized hydrochar catalysts [160].Sulfonated amorphous carbon, where the structure consists of -SO 3 H groups, presents much higher catalytic activity than other solid acid catalysts, providing feasibility in applications, such as biodiesel production [161].Similarly, sulfonated catalysts derived via HTC have also been utilized for isomerization and hydrolysis, as referenced in the Table 6.
In the case of sulfonated catalysts, surface porosity, including surface area, influences the catalytic activity as it indicates the number of active sites for an active group to anchor onto the carbon structure [162].From the study [163], they found a large quantity of the SO 3 H group were able to be incorporated into the carbon lattice due to the meso-and macroporous structure of the catalyst.Although the sulfonation process decreases pore volume and pore size from 0.57 cm 3 /g to 0.51 cm 3 /g and 53-44 nm, respectively, higher than normal sulfonated glucose acid density can be obtained due to the bimodal porosity of the catalyst [164].The porosity of the carbon material plays a significant role in anchoring the sulfonic group, thus affecting the catalytic activity of the sulfonated catalyst [165].Therefore, in order to produce an excellent catalyst, the porosity of the carbon catalyst must not be taken for granted as it has a momentous impact on the catalytic performance.On the other hand, the stability of such catalysts can be controlled by tuning the carbon particle size of the catalyst.Decreasing the carbon particle size of the catalyst could increase the effectiveness of the sulfonation process and stability by improving contact between carbon particle surfaces with H 2 SO 4 [165].
Apart from the sulfonated catalysts, carbonaceous catalysts consisting of transition metals (Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, etc.) and N coordination sites (N-doping) have also attracted attention as a substitute for Pt catalysts in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxidation, and desulfurization process.The utilization of Fe is advantageous, as standalone hydrochars show poor catalytic activity, whereas carbon-based materials prepared with FeCl 3 show the highest catalytic activity [166].Hydrochar's applicability as a support for such heterogenous catalysts is also attributed to its enhanced metal dispersion ability, and the mutual reaction of metal with the carbon owing to its various surface oxygen-containing functionalities like hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and lactone [167].Such functionalities help enhance access of metal solutions into the hydrochar's carbonaceous matrix as well as providing anchorage sites for the metal that can act as the active centers while functioning as catalysts [168].In addition, hydrochar's hydrophobicity provides excellent stability while confirming uniform metal dispersion, as observed by Ge at al. [169].From Table 6, Chen et al. [170] derived thiourea-Fe(NO 3 ) 3 -activated hydrochar and found that it offered a large surface area, pore volume, and other favorable surface functionalities (N and S functional groups) which improve complexation and electrostatic interaction for effective As(V) removal.Ma et al. [171] demonstrated that lignin-derived Fe-hydrochar could completely degrade phenol via its catalytic oxidation and exhibited stability upon three runs of regeneration.Moreover, as the hydrochar surface presents a higher degree of aromatization with plentiful oxygen-containing groups, it was conclusive to favor adsorption and degradation of organic pollutants [172].For example, Dang et al. [173] correlated a lower HTC temperature to result in more abundant oxygen-containing functional groups.This increase of oxygen-containing functional groups generates more free radicals due to the presence of increased reactive-active moieties (RAMs) that could enhance DDT adsorption by providing more react sites for DDT adsorption.Another non-noble based catalyst is nickel-based, which is used for dry reforming of methane.Here, the hydrochar support is advantageous because of the core-shell structure that limits active metal sintering and hence, prevents carbon deposition.Han et al. [174] utilized sugarcane bagasse and revealed that nickel-based catalysts have excellent CH 4 and CO 2 conversions at 80.3% and 90.3%, respectively, at 850 • C. On the other hand, heteroatom doping, particularly by nitrogen, has the ability to create new defects, resulting in more active sites in the carbon matrix.This consequently enhance electrocatalytic activity during cases of ORR and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [175,176].Specifically, N-doping results in the transfer of a charge from carbon atoms to adjacent nitrogen atoms that can lead to redistribution of the electronic and spin culture of the sp 2 -hybridized carbon framework [177][178][179].For example, Yu et al. [180] mediated nitrogen atoms in hydrochar that enhanced catalytic degradation of bisphenol A, bisphenol F, estrone, and 17β-estradiol where a higher surface area of hydrochar and graphitic-N species proved to be favorable.Similarly, the benefit of N-doping was demonstrated by Qiao et al. [181] where N-doping in the amorphous carbon structures could enhance ORR activity by creating nitrogenated active sites which promote electron transfer and also aid in protecting the Fe-derived active sites from catalyst poisoning by the byproducts of ORR reactions.
Another category of hydrochar-based catalyst being developed is composite photocatalysts where high charge transfer efficiency, high photocatalytic reaction, and excellent stability can be attained [182].This is because the carbonaceous char can serve as an excellent electron bridge due to its large aromatic skeleton, abundant functional groups, good electronic conductivity, and environmental benignity [183].The added bonus of hydrochar is the extra oxygen-containing functional groups, as mentioned before, which can act as an electron shuttle in photocatalysts that promote electron transfer while generating a greater number of oxygen reactive species by reacting with the hydration layer that promotes interfacial catalytic reaction.For example, Li et al. [182] concluded excellent photocatalytic activity in carbamazepine removal by microsphere-like hydrochar-based photocatalyst derived from glucose.Another type of photocatalyst is carbon dots (CD) produced via hydrothermal methods, which is beyond the scope of this manuscript.
In summary, as hydrochar catalyst support emerges and demonstrates versatile application in various fields, there is an opportunity of investigating tuning hydrochar's particle size, optimizing transition metal/dopant concentration, and doping of other heteroatoms to assess the effects on surface porosity (SSA, total pore volume and pore size) and functionality, which have been successfully demonstrated to be vital in catalytic activity.It is also imperative to undermine the catalysis mechanism, to identify and reveal the role of active centers, for the applications observed in order to further improve the characteristics of the heterogenous catalyst based on hydrochars by modifying the key constituent (active center) and develop reaction models.

Electrochemical Applications of Hydrochar
Figure 4 shows an overview of hydrochar's application as supercapacitor.As the dependency on energy surges, the importance to resort to renewable resources to meet these demands becomes absolute [201].Fortunately, researchers have entertained studies demonstrating hydrochar as a high value material for electrochemical devices such as supercapacitors and batteries [202].Both supercapacitors and batteries serve the purpose in providing energy with supercapacitors providing high power density and batteries supplying high energy density [201].

Electrochemical Applications of Hydrochar
Figure 4 shows an overview of hydrochar's application as supercapacitor.As the dependency on energy surges, the importance to resort to renewable resources to meet these demands becomes absolute [201].Fortunately, researchers have entertained studies demonstrating hydrochar as a high value material for electrochemical devices such as supercapacitors and batteries [202].Both supercapacitors and batteries serve the purpose in providing energy with supercapacitors providing high power density and batteries supplying high energy density [201].Figure 5 shows a three-dimensional (3D) plot of BET-specific surface area and the pore size of hydrochar for supercapacitors versus the capacitance from recent articles.The 3D plot showed a positive influence of surface porosity of hydrochar as high surface area and micro-meso pore size (<2 nm, 2-50 nm) results in high electron storage.The driving Figure 5 shows a three-dimensional (3D) plot of BET-specific surface area and the pore size of hydrochar for supercapacitors versus the capacitance from recent articles.The 3D plot showed a positive influence of surface porosity of hydrochar as high surface area and micro-meso pore size (<2 nm, 2-50 nm) results in high electron storage.The driving force for excellent supercapacitor performance is owed to the presence of hierarchical porous carbon (micro/meso/macro) which support ionic mass transport, thus maximizing capacitance [203,204].Fan et al. [205] investigated HTC and activation of alginic acid stable porous hollow carbon spheres (PHCSs).They observed well-balanced micro-and mesoporosity capable of maximum specific capacitance of 314 F/g and excellent electrochemical stability (5000 cycles) [205] (Figure 5).The study ascribed the superior performance to the high specific surface area (2421 m 2 /g) and large pore volume (1.61 cm 3 /g) [205].Similarly, Li et al. [206] presented functional porous carbon derived from waste eucalyptus bark synthesized by hydrothermal treatment combined with KOH activation for toluene adsorption and aqueous symmetric supercapacitors.The findings showed that maximum specific capacitance of 263.2 F/g was attainable with excellent capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles along with high energy and power densities of 10.5 Wh kg −1 and 159.5 W kg −1, respectively [206] (Figure 5).
rous carbon (micro/meso/macro) which support ionic mass transport, thus maximizing capacitance [203,204].Fan et al. [205] investigated HTC and activation of alginic acid stable porous hollow carbon spheres (PHCSs).They observed well-balanced micro-and mesoporosity capable of maximum specific capacitance of 314 F/g and excellent electrochemical stability (5000 cycles) [205] (Figure 5).The study ascribed the superior performance to the high specific surface area (2421 m 2 /g) and large pore volume (1.61 cm 3 /g) [205].Similarly, Li et al. [206] presented functional porous carbon derived from waste eucalyptus bark synthesized by hydrothermal treatment combined with KOH activation for toluene adsorption and aqueous symmetric supercapacitors.The findings showed that maximum specific capacitance of 263.2 F/g was attainable with excellent capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles along with high energy and power densities of 10.5 Wh kg −1 and 159.5 W kg −1, respectively [206] (Figure 5).Recent studies have shown that improvement in the specific capacitance of hydrochar can be introduced by heteroatom doping the hydrochar to add pseudocapacitance [207,208].Xu et al. [209] demonstrated the use of Fe-decorated porous carbon derived from bamboo synthesized via HTC with Fe-doping followed by mild chemical activation with KHCO3 for supercapacitor application.The study shows excellent electrochemical performance with maximum specific capacitance of 467 F/g with superb cyclic performance after 5000 cycles and maximum energy density of 20.31 W h kg −1 [209] (Figure 5).The performance was attributed to an extra pseudocapacitance supplied from the Fe oxides, sufficient specific surface area (1509.5 m 2 /g) with high electric conductivity and the carbon sphere architecture which facilitated better ion/electrolyte diffusion transportation [209].Similarly, Esteban et al. [210] prepared tunable supercapacitor material via hydrothermal polymerization of glucose-stabilized gold nanoparticles displaying maximum specific capacitance of 436 F/g and energy and power densities of 7.2 Wh kg −1 and 24.9 W kg −1, respectively (Figure 5).The performance was due to the synergistic effect of the pore Recent studies have shown that improvement in the specific capacitance of hydrochar can be introduced by heteroatom doping the hydrochar to add pseudocapacitance [207,208].Xu et al. [209] demonstrated the use of Fe-decorated porous carbon derived from bamboo synthesized via HTC with Fe-doping followed by mild chemical activation with KHCO 3 for supercapacitor application.The study shows excellent electrochemical performance with maximum specific capacitance of 467 F/g with superb cyclic performance after 5000 cycles and maximum energy density of 20.31 W h kg −1 [209] (Figure 5).The performance was attributed to an extra pseudocapacitance supplied from the Fe oxides, sufficient specific surface area (1509.5 m 2 /g) with high electric conductivity and the carbon sphere architecture which facilitated better ion/electrolyte diffusion transportation [209].Similarly, Esteban et al. [210] prepared tunable supercapacitor material via hydrothermal polymerization of glucose-stabilized gold nanoparticles displaying maximum specific capacitance of 436 F/g and energy and power densities of 7.2 Wh kg −1 and 24.9 W kg −1 , respectively (Figure 5).The performance was due to the synergistic effect of the pore structure after the Au nanoparticles were melted onto the hydrochar along with the well dispersed presence of the Au within the material [210].Moreover, hydrochar has proved promising as electrode material for electrochemical devices.

Role of Hydrochar as Soil Amendment and Carbon Sequestration
Figure 6 shows an overview of the application of hydrochar as soil amendment and carbon sequestration.Hydrochar can be considered as environment friendly soil amendment as it slowly releases the nutrient and sequester carbon.Hydrochar showed promising prospects of water and nutrient storage capacity, which enhances the microbial activity and hence, improves the soil fertility.As a result, the plant growth was positively affected due to applying the hydrochar in the soil.
dispersed presence of the Au within the material [210].Moreover, hydrochar has proved promising as electrode material for electrochemical devices.

Role of Hydrochar as Soil Amendment and Carbon Sequestration
Figure 6 shows an overview of the application of hydrochar as soil amendment and carbon sequestration.Hydrochar can be considered as environment friendly soil amendment as it slowly releases the nutrient and sequester carbon.Hydrochar showed promising prospects of water and nutrient storage capacity, which enhances the microbial activity and hence, improves the soil fertility.As a result, the plant growth was positively affected due to applying the hydrochar in the soil.Soil amendment on a global scale is becoming an important issue.Applying various ingredients, such as composts, mulches, manure, and organic fertilizer, could enhance soil fertility.However, only a small fraction of these organic compounds may be stabilized for the long term in soil depending on the climatic conditions [211].On the other hand, hydrochar which contains more stable carbon can be used to promote nutrient acquisition and modify the chemical environment of soil [212,213].It is also proven that the nitrogen present in hydrochar is not immobilized; rather, it is slowly released over time [212,[214][215][216][217][218].So, hydrochar can be used as soil amendment while slow-release nitrogen fertilizer is required.As the hydrochar is slow release and the organic compounds are fast release, the blends of hydrochar and organic compounds (e.g., animal manure, crop residues) may increase nutrients' availability to the plant [219].Hydrochar can be a potential source of not only carbon and nitrogen but also humic-like substances which are important for plant growth.For example, Bento et al. [220] found that applying bagasse-derived hydrochar significantly promotes maize seed germination due to the presence of amphiphilic moieties.Now, the question is: how does hydrochar improve the soil properties?
Due to having versatile physiochemical and morphological properties, hydrochar could be a promising soil amendment substance.Table 7 shows the impact of hydrochar as a soil amendment on the solid properties and plant growth rate.For instance, adding hydrochar to the soil enhances the total porosity and water holding capacity [221,222].Abel et al. [221] found that the water holding capacity increased due to the mixing of 2.5 wt% of corn silage-derived hydrochar with soil.The further addition of hydrochar does not improve the water holding capacity significantly because of the high organic content in hydrochar.A similar finding was observed by Kalderis et al. [223], where the authors reported that the water holding capacity increased until adding 5 wt% of orange peelderived hydrochar; however, an insignificant change occurred after mixing additional hydrochar.Due to the hydrophobic nature of the hydrochar [220,224,225], the addition of excessive hydrochar in soil could increase the water repellency, resulting in an insignificant improvement of water holding capacity.Addition of hydrochar into the soil ultimately reduces the soil's bulk density as the hydrochar is typically lighter than the soil [221].In addition to the bulk density, the coarseness index, which describes the particle size distribution may be influenced by the soil-hydrochar mixer.For example, 30% (v/v) Soil amendment on a global scale is becoming an important issue.Applying various ingredients, such as composts, mulches, manure, and organic fertilizer, could enhance soil fertility.However, only a small fraction of these organic compounds may be stabilized for the long term in soil depending on the climatic conditions [211].On the other hand, hydrochar which contains more stable carbon can be used to promote nutrient acquisition and modify the chemical environment of soil [212,213].It is also proven that the nitrogen present in hydrochar is not immobilized; rather, it is slowly released over time [212,[214][215][216][217][218].So, hydrochar can be used as soil amendment while slow-release nitrogen fertilizer is required.As the hydrochar is slow release and the organic compounds are fast release, the blends of hydrochar and organic compounds (e.g., animal manure, crop residues) may increase nutrients' availability to the plant [219].Hydrochar can be a potential source of not only carbon and nitrogen but also humic-like substances which are important for plant growth.For example, Bento et al. [220] found that applying bagassederived hydrochar significantly promotes maize seed germination due to the presence of amphiphilic moieties.Now, the question is: how does hydrochar improve the soil properties?
Due to having versatile physiochemical and morphological properties, hydrochar could be a promising soil amendment substance.Table 7 shows the impact of hydrochar as a soil amendment on the solid properties and plant growth rate.For instance, adding hydrochar to the soil enhances the total porosity and water holding capacity [221,222].Abel et al. [221] found that the water holding capacity increased due to the mixing of 2.5 wt% of corn silage-derived hydrochar with soil.The further addition of hydrochar does not improve the water holding capacity significantly because of the high organic content in hydrochar.A similar finding was observed by Kalderis et al. [223], where the authors reported that the water holding capacity increased until adding 5 wt% of orange peel-derived hydrochar; however, an insignificant change occurred after mixing additional hydrochar.Due to the hydrophobic nature of the hydrochar [220,224,225], the addition of excessive hydrochar in soil could increase the water repellency, resulting in an insignificant improvement of water holding capacity.Addition of hydrochar into the soil ultimately reduces the soil's bulk density as the hydrochar is typically lighter than the soil [221].In addition to the bulk density, the coarseness index, which describes the particle size distribution may be influenced by the soil-hydrochar mixer.For example, 30% (v/v) of dilution of hydrochar with soil showed the highest coarseness index with the lowest bulk density of the mixer.
Soil's pH is one of the key factors to growing microbial community and plants, as it regulates the ion solubility in the soil [226].In general, hydrochar is acidic and it becomes more acidic when it is produced at high temperatures [213,223,227,228].Thus, applying hydrochar can make the soil alkalinity relatively low.Ren et al. [229] found a significant drop in soil pH after mixing the sewage sludge-derived hydrochar, although the hydrochar had lower pH compared to the soil's initial pH.With the initial discrepancy in the pH between hydrochar and soil, more carboxylic functional groups formed over time due to the oxidation of the hydrochar surface resulting in a lower final pH.
Similar to the pH, electrical conductivity (which determines the level of soil salt content) is another key property of soil.When the salt content in the soil increases, it interrupts the water and nutrient balance which is detrimental to the plant.Belda et al. [230] reported the rising of electrical conductivity about 3-fold by applying 30% forest residuederived hydrochar into the soil, while a 25% decrease was observed after using sewage sludge-derived hydrochar.The increase in electrical conductivity could be due to the higher organic matters in the forest residue-derived hydrochar compared to the soil, while the reduction could be due to the lower cation exchange capacity and oxygen-to-carbon ratio in the sewage sludge-derived hydrochar [231].
In addition to the soil's physical and chemical properties, hydrochar has the potential to ameliorate the soil's microorganisms as it could deliver essential nutrients and total organic carbons to the soil [213].Although the potential impact of hydrochar on the microbial community is still in the initial stages, a few studies have found a positive impact of hydrochar on the growth of soil microbes [229,232,233].For instance, Ren et al. [229] observed a substantial increase in the abundance of Archaea, Bacteria, and Bacillus in the soil after applying hydrochar.There could be several reasons for this increase in microbes.For example, hydrochar contains more organic matter and has a relatively more specific surface area compared to the soil which helps prevent the leaching of bacteria from soil.In contrast, Andert and Mumme [234] reported the adverse effect of hydrochar.For example, the application of hydrochar in soil reduced the Acidobacteria 5-to-6-fold compared to the control, whereas the abundance of Firmicutes was less than one-third.However, the excess of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased 2.4 and 1.6-1.7 times, respectively.The shift in this microbial community could be due to the easily degradable carbon and low pH of hydrochar.It also observed that the utilization of hydrochar derived from two different feedstocks had different effects on the soil microorganism community.For example, the abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi was higher when paper mill biosludgederived hydrochar was applied [235], whereas a negative effect was observed when spent brewer's yeast-derived hydrochar was applied [236].The probable cause of this different behavior could not only be due to the pH but also the physical and chemical properties, nutrients, and phytotoxicity of hydrochar.
The presence of high aliphatic and less aromatic carbon accelerated microbial degradation made the hydrochar less stable in soil compared to biochar [237,238].It was also reported that the presence of high hydrophilic (e.g., hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl) functional groups, low C/N ratio, and low lignin content in the raw material enhance the degradability of the hydrochar [239].However, a study by Schulze et al. [240] found that instead of lignin content, the reaction temperature and time are more important in determining the hydrochar stability.It has been noticed that higher reaction temperature led to improving the hydrochar stability by increasing the carbon content.Contrariwise, Malghani et al. [22] concluded that corn silage-based hydrochar protects the soil carbon from decomposition as the carbon presence in hydrochar gradually stabilizes after initial rapid decomposition [241,242].It has been found that applying hydrochar along with fertilizer can generate noticeable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [230,234,243,244].On the other hand, Yu et al. [245] found that hydrochar can reduce GHG emissions by avoiding the composting of fresh biowaste.Similarly, Adjuik et al. [246] concluded that the utilization of hydrochar as a soil amendment did not significantly improve the crop yield; instead, it reduced the soil GHG fluxes by about 34%.
Overall, hydrochar application in soil showed a positive effect on soil aggregation, as a result, it has a good potential for carbon sequestration [236,247,248].In addition, this potential application could be further improved by removing (washing the hydrochar before using it) the superficially adsorbed labile components (responsible for biological decomposition) from the hydrochar [249].

Nutrient Recovery
Organic waste and biomass contain several nutrients which are essential for plants, apart from having a carbonaceous fraction.Among these nutrients, phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium, and calcium are predominantly found in waste biomass [250,251].In some organic wastes, sodium is also found, which is considered a functional nutrient [252].While nitrogen-, phosphorus-, and potassium-based fertilizer are manufactured through a chemical process, organic fertilizers are gaining traction for sustainable agricultural applications [250,253].In the case of organic waste and biomass, thermochemical treatments are common methods for their scalability [4].Among different nutrients, nitrogen is the most difficult one to recover considering its release into the atmosphere when high temperature treatment is applied [254].On the other hand, phosphorus recovery is becoming significantly important due to the depletion of the worldwide reserve [255].Hydrochar production from organic waste using HTC can provide a versatile solution to nutrient recovery from waste streams.
Nutrient recovery through HTC of organic waste can be achieved by two major pathways.The first pathway is to extract the minerals and nutrients from the parent feed which leaves the nutrients in the hydrochar and effluent liquid stream.Between the hydrochar and liquid effluent, hydrochar retains the major fraction of the plant nutrients [256,257].Some of the nutrients are recovered from liquid streams (especially, most of the K and Na were found in the liquid phase) by chemical or biochemical processes [258][259][260][261][262]. Notably, the char which contains a major fraction of calcium (>50%), phosphorus (>91%), and nitrogen (>26%), can be utilized as soil replenishment, i.e., as biochar [256].This is a direct method of nutrient recovery from the HTC process and hydrochar.As for the second pathway, it is achieved by using hydrochar as the mean for recovering nutrients from a waste stream (i.e., wastewater) [263].In this way, hydrochar can be used for not only recovering nutrients but also purifying the effluent by reducing the undesired nutrient release to the atmosphere.Additional nutrient release to the atmosphere may cause eutrophication (i.e., algal bloom) [264].The pathways for nutrient recovery from hydrochar are shown in Figure 7.
plications [250,253].In the case of organic waste and biomass, thermochemical treatments are common methods for their scalability [4].Among different nutrients, nitrogen is the most difficult one to recover considering its release into the atmosphere when high temperature treatment is applied [254].On the other hand, phosphorus recovery is becoming significantly important due to the depletion of the worldwide reserve [255].Hydrochar production from organic waste using HTC can provide a versatile solution to nutrient recovery from waste streams.
Nutrient recovery through HTC of organic waste can be achieved by two major pathways.The first pathway is to extract the minerals and nutrients from the parent feed which leaves the nutrients in the hydrochar and effluent liquid stream.Between the hydrochar and liquid effluent, hydrochar retains the major fraction of the plant nutrients [256,257].Some of the nutrients are recovered from liquid streams (especially, most of the K and Na were found in the liquid phase) by chemical or biochemical processes [258][259][260][261][262]. Notably, the char which contains a major fraction of calcium (>50%), phosphorus (>91%), and nitrogen (>26%), can be utilized as soil replenishment, i.e., as biochar [256].This is a direct method of nutrient recovery from the HTC process and hydrochar.As for the second pathway, it is achieved by using hydrochar as the mean for recovering nutrients from a waste stream (i.e., wastewater) [263].In this way, hydrochar can be used for not only recovering nutrients but also purifying the effluent by reducing the undesired nutrient release to the atmosphere.Additional nutrient release to the atmosphere may cause eutrophication (i.e., algal bloom) [264]  While both the methods are promising, the selection of a pathway is highly dependent on the feedstock and application criteria.The feedstock used in HTC may have a variable amount of nutrients and the speciation among different phases (i.e., solid, liquid, While both the methods are promising, the selection of a pathway is highly dependent on the feedstock and application criteria.The feedstock used in HTC may have a variable amount of nutrients and the speciation among different phases (i.e., solid, liquid, and gas) of HTC affects the amount of nutrients recovered [256,265,266].The macro-nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus are usually targeted for recovery while potassium is also available in some feedstock (for pathway 1).For example, if the biochar is generated by pyrolysis (>650 • C) of organic feedstock, the recovery of nitrogen from biochar is not feasible due to its release in the gas phase [267].As HTC uses low to moderate temperature for treatment, the resulting hydrochar can trap most of the nitrogen [254,256,267,268].If the organic feedstock is thermochemically converted (i.e., combustion and gasification) at higher temperatures (>600 • C), most of the phosphorus ends up in ash as phosphate complex compounds [255,269].It is to be noted that if the feedstock does not contain a significant amount of nutrient, pathway 1 would not be a feasible option.
As for pathway 2, recovering nutrients from a waste stream requires hydrochars with a large surface area, good wetting ability, and thermal stability for adsorbing nutrients [270].In addition, the application of activated hydrochar is suitable if the phosphorus concentration is lower than 2000 mg P/g in the waste stream [271].One method of increasing the surface is by activating the hydrochar which can increase the surface area by an order of magnitude (>2000 m 2 /g of hydrochar) [272,273].It is to be noted that the pathway 2 is not limited by the feedstock nutrient content, however, but is dependent on the application media nutrient content and hydrochar properties.Impregnating magnesium and bismuth showed good results in adsorbing phosphorus from the wastewater with a phosphorus recovery varying from 40-125 mg/g of activated char [274,275].While the advanced methods of hydrochar-based nutrient recovery are promising for recovering nutrients from waste streams, it is still early to determine their practical applicability in a commercial scale.Further studies are necessary for evaluating the techno-economic and environmental feasibility of these techniques.
To utilize the nutrients in the most efficient way, nutrients are to be recovered in an easily absorbable condition for plants.In the case of nitrogen, plants can uptake NO 3 − directly while some NH 4 + ions can be slowly absorbed [276].It is to be noted that a portion of the NH 4 + ions can be hydrolyzed by microorganisms to NO 3 − while a part of it releases as NH 3 to the atmosphere.On the other hand, phosphorus is preferred in phosphate compounds [277].A typical method to recover phosphorus would be through a struvite precipitation process applicable to only liquid waste streams [278].For direct applications of hydrochars, the available (i.e., free) phosphorous and nitrogen are critical.The retention of both phosphorus (as phosphate) and nitrogen (as nitrate, which is readily available for release) in the hydrochar at once may be difficult due to their opposing pH requirements for recovery.For example, low pH during HTC favors NH 4 + ion and free ammonia formation while high pH facilitates the phosphate and gaseous ammonia formation [279].The gaseous ammonia can be easily released to the atmosphere during the drying of hydrochar [280].Apart from pH, another important factor for nutrient speciation is temperature during HTC.With the temperature increase, the pH of hydrochar increases by removing the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups [281,282], which indirectly affects the nutrient retention in the char.Moreover, a higher potassium (K) release was favored at a high temperature environment for hydrochar production [281].As there are interacting parameters affecting the nutrient speciation in hydrochar, optimization is necessary to get to a point where nutrients can be recovered efficiently.Based on HTC experiments performed on anaerobic digestate, Stutzenstein et al. [280] found that the optimum temperature for hydrochar would be 230 • C, sacrificing the nitrogen recovery for the sake of phosphorus recovery (high pH).It is to be noted that the optimum operating parameters will vary with respect to the feedstock as well.As per the study by Dima et al. [256] on municipal solid waste, principal component analysis on several operating conditions yielded a negative impact of time and slightly positive impact of temperature on nutrient recovery in hydrochar.They also reported that potassium (K) and sodium (Na) ended up mostly in the liquid phase.The alkali metals are inorganically bound (as nitrates and chlorides) in the biomass, making them readily soluble in water [283,284].
It is to be remembered that there may be adverse effects in the case of direct application of hydrochar to soil if the free phosphorus is lower than the amount of phosphorus available in the soil.In such a case, it could adsorb phosphorus from the soil on its surface.According to a study by Fei et al. [285] on several types of chars (including hydrochars), up to 417 mg/kg of free phosphorus was available out of the total phosphorus content of 27,175 mg/kg of char.The free phosphorus was still higher than the soil phosphorus content, ensuring its suitability as slow-release fertilizer for the soil.Their study also revealed that P-laden (phosphorus adsorbed on the surface of hydrochar) chars were also suitable for application on soil as well.
Apart from direct application of hydrochar as a nutrient source, there are a few studies on acid leaching of nutrients from hydrochar for application in soil [286,287].Ekanthalu et al. [287] showed that post-treatment of hydochars after HTC process could leach higher amounts of phosphorus in the liquid phase leading to an easier release to soil.Higher acid concentration provided a better leaching performance of the phosphorus (up to 100%), as expected [286].
Other than recovering nutrients in hydrochar, they could be also used as a means to recover nutrients from wastewater.The mechanism for this process is dependent on the physico-chemical properties of the hydrochar, which include calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) content along with oxygen containing groups.The presence of Ca and Mg facilitates the capture of phosphorus while NH 4 -N is captured by the oxygen functional groups [288].Although physisorption is not the dominant mechanism in this case, a high surface area facilitates the recovery process [289].
Both hydrochar and nutrient-adsorbed hydrochar are excellent candidates for soil remedying as slow-release fertilizers.However, due to several factors affecting the recovery and application of hydrochar to soil, additional systematic studies are needed for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms.

Conclusions
This review summarized the scattered articles and provided an overview of hydrochar, its modified version, and its applications.Certain observations and recommendations may be made as follows.Increasing the HTC temperature also increases the fuel quality and fuel ratio, which as a result, improves the heating value of the hydrochars towards low-rank coal.In fact, the HTC of combined feedstocks increases the degree of conversion and improves the heating value more.The combustion properties also suggest that hydrochar is more thermally stable than raw feedstocks, which can be further improved by HTC of combined feedstocks.Overall, the HTC of combined feedstocks shows more promising results than the HTC of standalone feedstock.
Hydrochar has demonstrated excellent performance as a catalyst in various applications where catalytic activity is influenced by surface porosity parameters, like surface area, whereas various surface oxygen-containing functionalities of hydrochar help providing anchorage sites to be able to act as the active centers while functioning as catalysts.On the other hand, the oxygen-containing functionalities can also act as an electron shuttle to have demonstrated hydrochar's applicability as photocatalysts.For CO 2 capture, optimum micropore size distribution can be concluded as being 0.5-1.0nm, where certain surface functionalities seem favorable which include pyridinic-N, amine-or imine-N, pyrrolic-N, quaternary-N, and graphitic-N, which can benefit by establishing a chemisorption effect.On the other hand, monomodal size distribution centered below 0.8 nm and surface groups of pyrrole-N favor CH 4 uptake.Adsorption isotherm models like Toth and Freundlich were demonstrated to be a great fit for CO 2 adsorption isotherms where the Sips model fits CH 4 adsorption isotherms.
Even though pure hydrochar by itself exhibited promising adsorption properties for recurring heavy metals, adding acid, base, and oxidizers produced oxygen-rich functionalities, which eventually started the surface complexation reaction with the metal ions and removed them from the solution.In pristine hydrochar, the adsorption of pharmaceutical toxins is governed by physical attraction, surface area, Van der Waals force, π-π interaction, and hydrogen bonding.However, after modification, the adsorption efficiency significantly increased, with the mechanism being governed by the presence of more oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface.
Hydrochar grants the removal of dye molecules with improved adsorption capacity ranging between 47-5181 mg/g proving efficient uptake capabilities based on the available binding sites.Massive potential of hydrochar as an electrode material has been reported with specific capacitance ranging from 170-495 F/g, as there is more available mesoporous structure which enhances electron.
Hydrochar showed promising prospects of water and nutrient storage capacity.The carbon content and porous structure of hydrochar enhance the microbial activity and hence, improve the soil fertility.As a result, the plant growth was positively affected due to applying the hydrochar in the soil.In addition, as a carbon rich material, hydrochar can be used as a short-term carbon sequestration material.However, extensive studies, such as the reduction of GHG emission, on the fate of organic and inorganic in the soil are required to identity the long-term carbon sequestration potential of hydrochar.
Based on recent studies, it is evident that direct application of hydrochar on soil as a nutrient source could be considered a feasible option for practical application.However, more advanced applications such as nutrient extraction from hydrochar and nutrient recovery from waste streams using activated hydrochar require further assessment before large-scale implementation.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Number of publications including HTC and hydrochar on the title in last five year

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Number of publications including HTC and hydrochar on the title in last five years [29].

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Distribution of the specific capacitance, C (F/g), of hydrochar for supercapacitor application with correlation to the pore size, Dp (nm), and BET-specific surface area, SBET (m 2 /g).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Distribution of the specific capacitance, C (F/g), of hydrochar for supercapacitor application with correlation to the pore size, D p (nm), and BET-specific surface area, S BET (m 2 /g).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Hydrochar as soil amendment and carbon sequestration application.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Hydrochar as soil amendment and carbon sequestration application.
. The pathways for nutrient recovery from hydrochar are shown in Figure 7.

Funding:
The material is based upon work partially supported by the United States Department of Agriculture grant number 2019-67019-31594, 2021-67022-34487, and National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2123495.

Table 1 .
Fuel and combustion properties of hydrochar.

Table 7 .
Impact on solid properties and plant growth after applying the hydrohcar as soil amendment.