Bioengineering and Molecular Biology of Miscanthus

: Miscanthus is a perennial wild plant that is vital for the production of paper and rooﬁng, as well as horticulture and the development of new high-yielding crops in temperate climates. Chromosome-level assembly of the ancient tetraploid genome of miscanthus chromosomes is reported to provide resources that can link its chromosomes to related diploid sorghum and complex polyploid sugarcane. Analysis of Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus sacchariﬂorus showed intense mixing and interspeciﬁc hybridization and documented the origin of a high-yielding triploid bioenergetic plant, Miscanthus × giganteus . The Miscanthus genome expands comparative genomics functions to better understand the main abilities of Andropogoneae herbs. Miscanthus × giganteus is widely regarded as a promising lignocellulosic biomass crop due to its high-biomass yield, which does not emit toxic compounds into the environment, and ability to grow in depleted lands. The high production cost of lignocellulosic bioethanol limits its commercialization. The main components that inhibit the enzymatic reactions of fermentation and sacchariﬁcation are lignin in the cell wall and its by-products released during the pre-treatment stage. One approach to overcoming this barrier could be to genetically modify the genes involved in lignin biosynthesis, manipulating the lignin content and composition of miscanthus.


Introduction
Humanity uses natural gas, coal, peat and oil as the main sources of energy [1,2]. All these resources are nonrenewable, and their reserves are being depleted. In this regard, the issue of finding alternative renewable energy sources is acute, and plant raw materials are of particular interest. Such renewable plant raw materials as trees are a slowly renewable energy resource. Although 23% of the territory of the Russian Federation is covered with forest, wood accounts for more than 71.4 million hectares of the forested territory-81.5 billion m 3 [3].
Miscanthus is used in landscape design, for the manufacture of paper and roofing. This is a promising biomass resource that can replace fossil hydrocarbon fuels [4]. It belongs to the Andropogoneae herb family, which includes corn, sorghum and sugar cane-these crops are high yielding and important all over the world, and they can be grown as sources of food, feed and biofuels. Miscanthus is unpretentious and easy to grow. It can thrive in According to Baibakova et al., one of the most promising plants in this regard is miscanthus (Miscanthus spp.), which has a relatively high adaptive potential (it can be grown on unproductive degraded lands, on fields with a slope of up to 7 • , with soil acidity pH 5.5-7.5). The largest energy yield per unit area was 13.55 GJ/ha [20].
Its aboveground cellulose-containing biomass belongs to non-traditional renewable sources of raw materials and energy, the production of which does not require significant capital investments [21].
The study of miscanthus bioengineering and molecular biology is a vital task in this regard [10]. For the first time, this review gathered information on miscanthus species, their properties, and their application in bioengineering to obtain a substantial amount of plant biomass for biofuel production. This work aimed to summarize the research of the world's leading scientists on the methods of bioengineering and molecular biology of miscanthus to obtain promising sustainable biofuels.

The Importance of the Cell Wall in Miscanthus Bioengineering
Although there are many potential applications in bioprocessing, lignocellulose biomass is still largely untapped due to the stability of the cell wall, i.e., resistance to deconstruction, relative abundance and interaction between cell wall components [22]. Therefore, as demonstrated by Ochoa-Villarreal et al., in order to effectively use the cell wall as a renewable source of useful molecules, it is important to increase knowledge on how to assemble the wall in terms of composition and structure [23]. The cell walls of commelinoid monocots, including grasses, differ from other plant groups. In addition to lignin, these cell walls also contain a high percentage of cellulose, a low percentage of xyloglucan, mixed bonds and a high content of 4-β-xylan [24]. Xylanes usually contain acetyl substituents, arabinose and/or glucuronic acid attached to certain xylose residues in the main chain, hence, the name arabinoxylan (AX) and glucuronic acid arabinoxylan (GAX) [25]. The walls of miscanthus cells also contain a small amount of pectin. The studies of da Costa demonstrated that these pectins are polysaccharides rich in α-galacturonic acid. Polysaccharides are thought to be composed of three domains (homogalacturonan, rhamnogalacturonan-I and rhamnogalacturonan-II), linked by glycosidic bonds [26]. Cellulose was determined by the Kürschner method. The fiber content was determined by the Kürschner method, which is based on the oxidative destruction of all substances, except fiber, in a mixture of acetic and nitric acids. Cellulose fibers were separated and dried. The percentage to the weight of a raw or anhydrous sample was determined as a result of weighing [27]. In Table 1, the chemical composition of samples [28,29] of various miscanthus types are presented. Miscanthus plants (Table 1) of the species M. × giganteus, M. sinensis and M. Sacchariflonis were grown in open ground in the conditions of the Siberian Forest steppe, in a temperate climate with a sufficient amount of heat and solar energy, at a moisture level of up to 500-600 mm of precipitation per year. Miscanthus was planted in open ground in sunny locations in the spring, when the temperature is high and the earth heats up to +20-25 • C. No more than 1-2 plants were planted per 1 m 2 . The soil for growing miscanthus was well drained, but not waterlogged. Miscanthus plants grew just as well on acidic and heavy clay soils as it did on black or fertilized soils. A well-developed root system makes the plant suitable for growing on various types of soils, from sands (with a low level of groundwater) to soils with a high organic matter content [30]. Miscanthus grew well in a wide range of soil pH, but the ideal pH was between 5.5 and 7.5. The fallen leaves of the plant itself were an excellent fertilizer. Nitrogen fertilizers were applied in autumn and organic fertilizers were applied several times during the growing season. It is critical not to overuse nitrogen fertilizers, as this will affect the color of the leaves as well as the quality of the biomass. Fertilizers, pesticides and inter-row tillage were applied in the same manner as for traditional crops, but mostly in the first year of growth. Such measures are very limited in subsequent years (if appropriate, they are carried out only in early spring, at the beginning of the growing season). Weed management was essential for miscanthus plantings, particularly in the first and second years of cultivation. After that, it was not necessary, since the miscanthus plants were already well rooted and competed with weeds. Miscanthus is cut-harvested as biomass grows (2-3 times per season). Miscanthus samples were chemically analyzed after four years of cultivation [30].
Galacturonans (HG) makes up most of the cell wall pectin and includes unbranched chains of α-galacturonic acid residues connected by methylated bonds. In addition, rare ingredients, such as hydroxycinnamate (HCA) and structural proteins, can be found [31]. The complexity of cell wall composition is complicated by the fact that various components of the cell wall are linked together by a process, much like the molecular structure that maintains the integrity of plant tissue and resists external attacks. Therefore, according to Marowa et al., it is not easy to understand these complex connections, especially considering that about 10% of plant genomes are related to the assembly/disassembly of cell walls [32].
Research into improving lignocellulose biomass for biological purification purposes has stimulated the structure study of plant cell walls [32]. Determining the required characteristics of the cell wall and cultivating cultures containing such characteristics are key steps to optimize the bioremediation of lignocellulose [32]. However, the study of [30] showed that since the composition of all cell walls is different, often, there are difficulties in the complex assessment of the quality of different raw materials, especially throughout different studies that consider the profile of the reference cell wall to increase the biomass of leaves and stems of Miscanthus [30]. In this material, particular attention is paid to the composition of cell wall glycans [31].
Research on the structural composition and distribution of glycans in miscanthus organs and/or tissues is important not only for optimizing the use of lignocellulose biomass as a raw material for renewable biological products and bioenergetic solutions, but also for understanding the significance of the cell wall [31]. Studies based on mid-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy in the mid-infrared region show that structural polysaccharides are a major factor in composition variability during trunk development and between organs [32].
The study of [33] identified factors causing this variation in components (temperature, humidity, pH, organic and mineral composition of the soil, type and age of the plant and its productivity) and discussed some important observations about possible interactions between components and cell wall structures. It has been shown that various monoclonal antibodies targeting plant glycans can be markers of changes in characteristics of glycans in the matrix (distribution, structure and extractability) [33]. This set of molecular markers of Miscanthus has sufficient variability to identify most types of non-cellulose polysaccharides in the plant cell wall [19]. This was the first time that researchers used a complex of glycantargeted antibodies to comprehensively characterize cell wall glycome variation across cultures to create a representative sample of Miscanthus wall biomass data (reference map) [32]. Several global breeding programs are known to genetically improve the biomass and yield characteristics of Miscanthus, based on the use of genotypic and phenotypic differences between and within the species diversity of Miscanthus [34].
The detailed miscanthus cell wall portrait in these studies contributes to genetic transformation, providing important information for the formation of the necessary charac-teristics in different types of miscanthus, which are planned to be processed into biofuels and other biological materials [34].
Thus, this section discussed some important observations about possible interactions between the components and structures of cell walls and presented the factors that contribute to the transformation of miscanthus into a renewable source of biofuel. The complexity of the miscanthus cell wall composition, which affects miscanthus bioconversion into biofuel, was revealed.

Study of the Miscanthus Genome
In the studies of [35], the miscanthus genome was assembled on n = 19 chromosomes by combining data from the target genome (WGS) and affinity for the phosphoramidite end and chromatin in vitro and in vivo. The control sample is a duplicate of the previously characterized sample [36]. It was established that it is a homozygous haploid DH18. The genome assembly attributes a contig of 1.68 GB to a chromosome with a contig length of N50 33.1 bp [35]. The length up to HiC N50 is 190 bp. An additional 0.20 GB contig sequence in the frame was not placed in the pairing group. Mitros et al. confirmed that compared to an integrated genetic map with 4298 labeled markers, the assembly occurs at the chromosomal scale [35].
Based on various pieces of evidence, the structure of 67,967 protein-coding genes was predicted, including homology with other crops and deep transcriptome data for Miscanthus and sugarcane [35]. These predicted genes accounted for 98% and 94% of protein coding genes, respectively, and were assigned to chromosomal positions. These genes are embedded in moving element chains and other repeating sequences (making up 72.4% of the Miscanthus genome assembly). Mitros et al. established that the most common type of transposon to be assembled is the retrotransposon with a long terminal repeat (LTR) [35].
After considering the fusion of chromosomes 4 and 7 of the ancestral sorghum chromosomes, each sorghum chromosome corresponds to a pair of Miscanthus chromosomes, so the ancient Miscanthus tetraploid was discovered at the sequence level [35]. This makes the karyotype n = 20, kn = 19. As expected (Mitros et al.), the genomes of Miscanthus and sorghum showed extensive conservative collinear synthesis of 2:1, which corresponds to complete duplication of genomes in overlapping lines of Miscanthus origin [35]. Although it is believed that duplication is typical for sugar cane, a comparison of the of M. sinensis and S. spontaneum genomes found that duplication in these two strains differs. Although studies of Miscanthus genomics have shown its allotetraploid origin, the mechanism of the ancient tetraploid has not been described, partly due to the lack of known diploid progenitor cells [35].
The studies of Mitros et al. demonstrated that M. × giganteus is a perennial plant with a triploid rhizome obtained naturally as a result of natural crossing of diploid M. sinensis and tetraploid M. sacchariflorus [35]. Unique characteristics (high biomass production, low environmental impact, the potential for cultivation on poor soils) of M. × giganteus determine the prospects for use of the crop for the production of lignocellulose biomass for bioethanol [35]. However, as established by Zeng et al., the persistent nature of lignocellulose raw materials increases the cost of pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation processes, which slows down the current commercialization of lignocellulose bioethanol [37].
Lignin, among the biopolymers of lignocellulose biomass, is one of the main factors determining the stability of organisms, due to the significant content of secondary cell walls [38]. Moreover, by-products released at the pretreatment stage act as the main inhibitors of enzymatic reactions in the process of fermentation or saccharification [39]. Zeng et al. observed a similar correlation in natural samples of Miscanthus. In addition, sterility of M. × giganteus increases the ecological safety of genetic engineering. These results demonstrated that the genetic manipulation in the process of lignin biosynthesis is viable [40]. This requires basic knowledge about the interactions between the genes related with lignin biosynthesis and how to regulate these genes in M. × giganteus [40]. Anderson et al. reported that lignin in the cell wall consists mainly of p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G) and syringyl (S) units, which polymerize p-coumarin, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohol from the corresponding mono-xylophenols [41]. In flowering plants, these monolignols are synthesized via a common phenylpropanoid and the following monolignolspecific pathways [42]. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase (C4H) catalyze the synthesis of p-cumaric acid from phenylalanine via the general phenylpropanoid way [42].
Bifunctional cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (APX) acts as 4-coumarate-3-hydroxylase, synthesizing caffeic acid by 3-hydroxylation of para-coumaric acid [43]. The subsequent 3-O-methylation from caffeic acid to ferulic acid is catalyzed by caffeic acid/5hydroxyconiferaldehyde 3/5-O-methyltransferase [44]. These hydroxycinnamic esters are then converted into the corresponding CoA esters by 4-hydroxycinnamate: CoA ligase. Alison and Staunton noted that a more commonly accepted pathway for the synthesis of caffeyl-CoA comes from p-coumaroyl-CoA via the catalysis of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase and coumaroyl shikimate-3 -hydroxylase (C3 H) [45]. The resulting caffeylcoa 3-O is methylated by caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase. In the monolignol-specific pathway, these CoA esters are converted into the corresponding aldehydes and alcohols by cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), respectively ( Figure 1) [46]. In addition, Barros et al. demonstrated [43] that in the monolignol biosynthesis way, some enzymes participate in the transition from monolignol G to S at the level of aldehydes and alcohols, including COMT and ferulic acid/coniferaldehyde-5-hydroxylase. These results demonstrated that the genetic manipulation in the process of lignin biosynthesis is viable [40]. This requires basic knowledge about the interactions between the genes related with lignin biosynthesis and how to regulate these genes in M. × giganteus [40]. Anderson et al. reported that lignin in the cell wall consists mainly of p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G) and syringyl (S) units, which polymerize p-coumarin, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohol from the corresponding mono-xylophenols [41]. In flowering plants, these monolignols are synthesized via a common phenylpropanoid and the following monolignol-specific pathways [42]. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase (C4H) catalyze the synthesis of p-cumaric acid from phenylalanine via the general phenylpropanoid way [42].
Bifunctional cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (APX) acts as 4-coumarate-3-hydroxylase, synthesizing caffeic acid by 3-hydroxylation of para-coumaric acid [43]. The subsequent 3-O-methylation from caffeic acid to ferulic acid is catalyzed by caffeic acid/5-hydroxyconiferaldehyde 3/5-O-methyltransferase [44]. These hydroxycinnamic esters are then converted into the corresponding CoA esters by 4-hydroxycinnamate: CoA ligase. Alison and Staunton noted that a more commonly accepted pathway for the synthesis of caffeyl-CoA comes from p-coumaroyl-CoA via the catalysis of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase and coumaroyl shikimate-3′-hydroxylase (C3′H) [45]. The resulting caffeylcoa 3-O is methylated by caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase. In the monolignol-specific pathway, these CoA esters are converted into the corresponding aldehydes and alcohols by cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), respectively (Figure 1) [46]. In addition, Barros et al. demonstrated [43] that in the monolignol biosynthesis way, some enzymes participate in the transition from monolignol G to S at the level of aldehydes and alcohols, including COMT and ferulic acid/coniferaldehyde-5-hydroxylase.  However, Hyun et al. found that the biosynthetic pathway of monolignol varies from species to species. In some monocotyledons, PAL also has the ability to directly catalyze the non-oxidative decomposition of ammonia tyrosine into maleic acid, which is called the tyrosine reduction pathway [47]. Another example is caffeylshikimateesterase (CSE).
In some species, it can convert caffeine-CoA into caffeic acid, but there are no orthologs in the genomes of B. distachyon, Z. mays and S. bicolor [48]. Devi et al. showed that this diversity underscores the necessity to comprehend monolignol biosynthetic pathways in all lignocellulose cultures [21].
In essence, some studies concentrated on the genetics and regulation of the monolignol biosynthesis way in certain bioenergetic herbs [40]. However, comprehensive studies are still lacking for Miscanthus species, and a comprehensive model has not yet been created. To fill this gap, the main genes of monolignol biosynthesis in M. × giganteus were identified and possible transcription factors that directly regulate these genes were predicted [40]. These studies provide a list of potential target genes for genetic modification of lignocellulose biomass M. × giganteus. In addition, they demonstrated the genetic, regulatory and transcriptional methods of monolignol biosynthesis in M. × giganteus [40].
MgCCR1 and MgCCR2 are two of the genes generated in the genus-specific part of WGD. Installed, compared to MgCCR2, MgCCR1 rapidly accumulates mutations in MgCCR3 and is independent of MgCCR4 for a short period of evolution [40]. This indicates that the evolution of asymmetric monolignol biosynthesis genes may accelerate to an early stage after WGD, and then gradually decreases. This conclusion is consistent with the results of observation of yeast WGD [40].
Wang et al. established that data on transcription of various organs of M. × giganteus allow us to study the main mechanisms of regulation of gene transcription in the border regions of genes. Firstly, the functional interrelationships of the co-expressed genes are indicated [49]. Genes showing a statistically significant pattern of positive correlation expression (Spearman correlation coefficient ≥ 0.4, p < 0.05 value) were considered coexpressed genes. In monolignol biosynthesis, for each major gene, the co-expressed genes constitute from 3.19% to 18.42% of the total number of expressed genes [40]. Analysis of the accumulation of GO and KEGG shows that these genes are more representative in the GO and KEGG pathways [50]. According to Zeng et al., these pathways are associated with the formation of secondary cell walls or have overall intermediate products with monolignol biosynthesis (Fischer's exact test using the Benjamin-Hochberg multiple criteria to correct p < 0.05) [40].
The co-expressed MgHCT1 gene was associated with "the process of lignin biosynthesis", "the process of phenylpropane biosynthesis", "the process of phenylpropane metabolism", "secondary generation of plant-type cell wall" and "phenylalanine". The KEGG pathway is associated with GO enrichment, from the side of "phenylalanine metabolism", "flavonol biosynthesis", "suberin blocking and paraffin biosynthesis". The conformity between gene expression and gene function instructs that the main genes of monolignol biosynthesis are closely related to these genes. It is jointly regulated by M. × giganteus, as demonstrated by Zeng et al. [40].
The breeding of improved Miscanthus for biomass production in order to obtain biofuels may depend on the abundance and ploidy level of wild genetic material of various species [35,51]. Therefore, according to Schaefer et al., the Miscanthus genetic variety and the distribution of interspecific and intraspecific variability in mixed populations were investigated. Using the new WGS sequencing technology, WGS sequencing was performed on 18 different ploidic attachments (including triploid biomass of the M. × giganteus «Illinois») [35] in combination with genotyping data, mainly from wild Miscanthus species in the north and southeast of China, Japan and Russia. Genome-wide mixing and PPSH easily identify differences between two species (M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus) [52]. Hodkinson et al. established that Miscanthus species, such as M. transmorrisonensis and M. floridulus, belong to the genetic variation in M. sinensis, indicating that these taxa should be more properly considered subtypes of M. sinensis [53]. However, the specimen called M. junceus is significantly different and appears to be less related to Miscanthus than to sugarcane. It is African and sometimes belongs to a separate Miscanthidium and is distinctly separated from M. sinensis [53]. The data obtained prove that the high-yield triploid M. × giganteus "Illinois" is an interspecific hybrid of the tetraploid M. sacchariflorus and the diploid M. sinensis [54].
The main allele ratio of M. sacchariflorus: M. sinensis is 2:1. This hypothesis supports the genome; however, it was observed that the ancestors of M. sacchariflorus are interspecific mixed, indicating that the greatest productive genotype of M. sinensis currently cultivated penetrates into M. sacchariflorus. Hybrids of M. sacchariflorus and M. sinensis are often very active and highly productive, regardless of whether they are diploid, triploid or tetraploid [40]. Therefore, Zeng et al. showed that understanding the previous gene infiltration of M. sinensis (and M. sacchariflorus) alleles and the genetic background affecting the potential yield of subsequent interspecific hybrids will be very important for optimizing breeding strategies [40].
Specifically, M. × giganteus combines the genes of its parent M. sinensis (many stems per unit area; short rhizomes) with the habitus of the spreading rhizome of its parent M. sacchariflorus (several stems per unit area; long rhizomes); usually, an average number of stems per unit area is necessary for highly productive reproduction of M. × giganteus [52]. Productivity indicators of different Miscanthus species [55], depending on their ploidy, are presented in Table 2. A recently collected [57] sample of the Japanese triploid M. × giganteus "Ogi80" is similar to "Illinois" and contains several short chains, including two or three alleles of M. sinensis. These regions may be the result of segmental transformation or loss of a gene during reproduction of this sterile triploid, or the result of interspecific infiltration before the formation of a triploid [58]. Another natural triploid, "Ogi63", showed a unique pattern, emphasizing the variety of Miscanthus natural polyploid hybrids of Miscanthus, as reported by St Charles et al. [58].
Polyploidy is also common in group C4 of closely related and high-yielding perennial grasses of the subfamily Saccharinae, including sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) and Miscanthus. By crossing Miscanthus hybrids with a sugarcane hybrid [59], Miscanthus hybrids can be obtained, which indicates that the natural genetic variability in the two genera can be combined to mix the desired traits (such as cold resistance and disease resistance), as demonstrated by Kar et al. [59].
In the study of [60], it was found that the ratio of C/N in the collected biomass of M. × giganteus steadily increased as the season moved into winter, while in spring and summer, minimum levels of the C/N ratio were observed (Table 3). To describe the seasonal dynamics of gene expression and regulatory programs associated with perennial Miscanthus, RNA sequencing was performed from the same tissue samples selected for the nitrogen cycle profiling [40]. According to Guo et al., Principal Component Analysis detected two main sources of tissue-type variation, followed by sampling time [61]. Using gene catalogs to compare tissues, it was found that the genes preferred for leaves are present in significant numbers in genes associated with carbon fixation and metabolism, and it is preferable that stem genes include genes associated with amino acid metabolism and biosynthesis of the phenylpropane [40]. Samson et al. reported that gene expression in rhizomes is more like expression in stems than in leaves, which corresponds to the genetic origin of the modified stems [40]. Rhizomes, unlike stems and leaves, mainly express transcription to the genes that respond to stimuli, such as water and stress and factors that regulate growth and metabolic processes. As such, 35 genes were identified, mainly expressed in rhizomes, including homologues of such genes as Giganteus (GIK) and Short Internode (SHI), which are involved in the structure, differentiation and elongation of cells [40]. In plants, they are compact, with short stem internodes, [41], which correspond with morphological differences between rhizomes and stems of Miscanthus.
The Miscanthus yield was demonstrated to be dependent on harvest time as well as the biosynthesis pathway of monolignols. Genetic studies were described to establish the dependence of the yield of Miscanthus on the genotype.

Cloning of MlARF-GEP, MlKHCP, MlSERK1, MlSERK2 and MlTypA
In the study of Zhao et al., full-length ORF cDNA sequences of three genes, M1ARF-GEP, M1SERK1 and M1SERK2 (GenBank access numbers KU640196, KU640198 and KU640199), obtained from kU640199, were cloned by amplification of degenerate primers designed for sorghum and maize sequences [62]. However, for Zhao et al., based on the resulting cDNA, the other two genes accept only partial open frames for reads in the cDNA sequence and are referred to as M1KHCP and M1TypA (GenBank access numbers KU640197 and KU640200) [62]. The length of the complete M1ARF-GEP ORF sequence is 5385 bp and encodes a protein of 1794 amino acids. The length of the MLSERK1 cDNA sequence is 1956 bp. It contains an open reading frame measuring 1872 bp, which encodes a protein of 624 amino acids. The length of 5 -UTR and 3 -UTR is 9 and 75 base pairs, respectively [62]. The length of the MlSERK2 cDNA sequence is 2119 bp. It contains an ORF of size 1878 bp, which encodes 626 amino acids. Zhao et al. determined that the length of the incomplete ORF MlTypA sequence is 1962 bp and encodes a protein of 654 amino acids [62].
Compared to other monocots (B. distachyon, O. brachyantha, O.sativa, S. italica, S. bicolor and Z. mays) and dicots (A. thaliana, B. napus, M. domestica and R. communis), the sequence and length of the MlARF-GEP protein are quite conservative [62,63]. It is determined by multiple comparison analysis [62]. Compared to M1ARF-GEP, the highest identity is 99% (SbARF-GEP). The phylogenetic tree constructed by the MEGA 5.1 program shows that MIARF-PVA is divided into monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous groups [62]. According to Zhao et al., this means that M1ARF-GEP evolved irrespective after differentiation of monocots and dicots. Furthermore, M1ARF-GEP found the closest genetic interrelation with SbARF-GEP [62]. Multiple alignment analysis of MlKHCP persisted in both monocots and dicots plants, and adjacent connecting trees showed characteristics similar to MlARF-GEP. MlKHCP has shown a close genetic interrelation with SbKHCP [62]. In addition, it has been confirmed that it is compatible with monocotyledons (O. sativa Indica group, S. bicolor, T. aestivum and Z. mays), dicotyledons (A. thaliana, C. sinensis, G. max, G. hirsutum, N. benthamiana, S. lycopersicum and V. vinifera), mosses (P. patens) and ferns (S. moellendorffii) [62]. MlSERK1 and MlSERK2 are conserved in protein sequence and length. The phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA 5.1 shows that MlSERK1 and MlSERK2 are divided into four key groups (monocots, dicots, mosses and ferns). MlSERK1 shows the closest genetic interrelation with SbSERK2, and MlSERK2 demonstrats the closest genetic relationship with ZmSERK2 and SbSERK3 [62].  [62].
Thus, Miscanthus genes were cloned by amplification of degenerate primers. Compared to M1ARF-GEP, the highest gene identity was 99% (SbARF-GEP). It was found that M1ARF-GEP developed independently after the differentiation of monocots and dicots.

Analysis of Polymorphism of SSR Markers of 5 Genes
Zhao et al. reported that embryogenic callus from 37 specimens of M. lutarioriparius was induced in only 9 specimens [62,64]. In the sorghum genome database (based on five genes), the CCP locus was not detected in the MlARF-GEP and MlTypA genes using the CCP Hunter 1.3 analysis method [65]. Although five SSR loci were found in M1KHCP and one SSR locus was found in MISERK2, polymorphism was not found. It turned out that two MISERK1-3 and MISERK1-4 CCP loci were amplified by three alleles in 37 M. lutarioriparius. The MISERK1-3 mutation shows the importance of the induction response but is independent of MISERK1-4 [62]. All individuals that can be induced by embryogenic Miscanthus callus were observed in part of heterozygotes, and during amplification of MISERK1-3, all homozygotes were induced by nonembryogenic Miscanthus callus [66].
Results obtained by Glowacka et al. demonstrated that explants in tissue culture of Miscanthus species tissues from immature inflorescences are often used [67]. However, the genotype of the material, the conditions of cultivation of callus Miscanthus and the concentration of plant regulators in the environment will affect the growth and development of embryogenic Miscanthus callus simultaneously [67]. Similar results were obtained for rice [67]. The inflorescence length is one of the causes for the induction of embryogenic Miscanthus callus [67]. In this study, 37 specimens of M. lutarioriparius were used for callus induction. A variety of induction frequencies has been studied [62]. The results of induction are influenced by various genotypes [62]. Some genes, such as SERK, can play an important role in embryogenesis. In our study, two SERK MISERK1 and MISERK2 genes were evaluated. According to Zhao et al., they showed similar or different expression patterns at different stages of development of embryogenic Miscanthus callus [62,68]. In addition to the above results, MlSERK1 showed significant differences between the genotype and characteristics of callus. Zhao et al. confirmed that all genotypes that can be induced from embryogenic Miscanthus callus are heterozygotes of MlSERK1 [62]. This discovery may mean that MlSERK1 heterozygotes are easier to induce than homozygous ones. This study shows that the MlSERK1 protein plays an important role in embryogenic Miscanthus callus formation, and more research is needed to determine its exact role [62]. Zhao et al. demonstrated that the relative expression of MlSERK1 and MlSERK2 increased significantly in the third week, which may be due to the accumulation of hormones in the medium [62]. Relative expression dropped sharply at week 4, possibly due to a weakening of hormones. Many reports indicate that Miscanthus species are insufficiently cultured in tissue culture every 3 weeks [69], so the expression patterns of MlSERK1 and MlSERK2 confirm the above method at the molecular level [70].
According to available data, ZmARF-GEF belongs to the ADP ribosylation factors (ARF); when alternating between PIB and GTP, it acts as a relay [71]. In maize, ZmARF-GEF is associated with auxin flux and polarization, which also affects the forming of embryogenic Miscanthus callus [62]. Huyen et al. proved that MlARF-GEP is tightly related to ZmARF-GEF. Furthermore, depending on the expression patterns, in two types of callus M1ARF-GEP, this means that M1ARF-GEP in M. lutarioriparius and ZmARF-GEF in Z. mays may play similar roles [62,72].
Results of Zhao et al. demonstrated that KHCP can be a type of protein similar to the heavy chain of kinesin, which can spread through the fibers of the cytoskeleton, hydrolyzing ATP for energy production [62]. Analysis of the alignment of homologous sequences shows that MlTypA is very similar to TypA protein (protein phosphorylated with tyrosine) of other species [62]. Phylogenetic analysis established that MlTypA is close to SbTypA and ZmTypA. TypA is a new type of ribosome-binding protein from the GTPase superfamily, which participates in a variety of regulatory pathways [73]. Dou et al. confirmed that the AtTypA gene is involved in the growth of pollen tubes of arabidopsis [74]. A fragment of cDNA TypA was isolated from the callus of a corn embryo. It is assumed that ZmTypA may play a similar role in the regulation of other species [62,75].
Thus, the possibility of Miscanthus microclonal reproduction was studied, and it was demonstrated that tissues of immature inflorescences are often used as explants in tissue culture of Miscanthus species. It was shown that the genotype of the material, cultivation conditions of the Miscanthus callus, and the concentration of plant increase regulators in the environment have an effect on the increase and development in the Miscanthus callus.

Conclusions
In this study, MgPAL1, MgPAL5, Mg4CL1, Mg4CL3, MgHCT1, MgHCT2, MgC3 H1, MgCCoAOMT1, MgC3 CCo and MgCCoAOMT1, and MgC3 CCoH1s were discussed as the major genes for monoligol biosynthesis in M. × giganteus. ERF families can directly regulate the expression of these major genes by associating with their promoters for the biosynthesis of monolignols [62]. Based on the presented results, an integrated model and a potential regulatory mechanism of the monolignol biosynthesis pathway were generalized. This work presents important information for understanding the genetic and transcriptional regulation of the monolignol biosynthesis pathway in M. × giganteus [40]. In addition, by combining the content and structure of lignin, the complexity of potential candidate genes for a genetic increase in the quality of lignocellulose biomass was identified [76].
Miscanthus is a promising source of long-term biomass and a promising candidate for biofuel crops (it has highly efficient C4 photosynthesis), which is easily adaptable. Its high resistance to drought and cold and its ability to grow in areas with limited resources make it suitable for both tropical and temperate climates [77]. Optimization of Miscanthus productivity and resistance is determined by systematic improvements based on the reviewed genome sequences and their analysis. It is expected that a comparative analysis of Andropogoneae [78], in which Miscanthus is combined with corn, sorghum and sugar cane, will form the genetic basis of innovations, resulting in high yields and wide adaptation of this plant species [79].