Impact of Window to Wall Ratio on Energy Loads in Hot Regions: A Study of Building Energy Performance

The concern regarding local responsive building design has gained more attention globally as of late. This is due to the issue of the rapid increase in energy consumption in buildings for the purpose of heating and cooling. This has become a crucial issue in educational buildings and especially in schools. The major issue in school buildings in Saudi Arabia is that they are a form of prototype school building design (PSBD). As a result, if there is any concern in the design stage and in relation to the selection of building materials, this will spread throughout the region. In addition to that, the design is repeated regardless of the climate variation within the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This research will focus on the influence of the window to wall ratio on the energy load in various orientations and different climatic regions. The research will use the energy computer tool TAS Environmental Design Solution Limited (EDSL) to calculate the energy load as well as solar gain. During the visit to the sample schools, a globe thermometer will be used to monitor the globe temperature in the classrooms. This research introduces a framework to assist architects and engineers in selecting the proper window to wall ratio (WWR) in each direction within the same building based on adequate natural light with a minimum reliance on energy load. For ultimate WWR for energy performance and daylight, the WWR should range from 20% to 30%, depending on orientation, in order to provide the optimal daylight factor combined with building energy efficiency. This ratio can be slightly greater in higher altitude locations.


Introduction
Buildings in different types and forms are responsible for about 40% of the energy demand, which is considerable amount [1]. In reference to the concept of green architecture, windows are considered to be the weakest component of the building envelope in terms of performance and energy efficiency [2][3][4]. They are responsible for the largest amounts of heat transmittance, direct solar gain, and thermal bridging in buildings [5]. Depending on the outdoor conditions and glazing size, windows are responsible for around 10% to 25% of the total heat loss [6]. Therefore, adjusting the window to wall ratio (WWR) can lead to a considerable impact on energy compared with adjusting the external walls' thickness [3,7]. In addition to the size of the window, its orientation has a relatively great influence on energy consumption and the internal thermal conditions [8]. It is noteworthy that all glazing systems, regardless of the façade orientation, should be minimized in hot regions [9]. Considering this, the glazing systems should be carefully designed, especially in regions where the level of solar radiation is considerably high. This paper aims to investigate the influence of WWR on energy load under two different microclimatic regions in Saudi Arabia, namely hot and dry and high land regions. This research investigates The study and configuration of WWR should be included in the design stage to improve the energy performance of the building [1]. However, there are other parameters that need to be highlighted that affect energy building performance such as the glazing type and use of shading. In a study conducted by Cesari and Khoukhi [14,15], the results indicated that retrofitting may have a major influence on the building's energy pattern as well as the cost of the energy consumption. It has to be mentioned that orientation is linked to WWR. It controls the amount of solar gain that the building envelope is exposed to [16]. earch investigates the widely spread WWR ratios in the region based on the work of wetaishi [4], who observed a varied WWR of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% on the exnal wall. Similarly, a work carried out in a similar climate showed that 40% of WWR is timum when it comes to controlling the energy and environmental performance [10]. contrast, in other climatic zones such as in the case of Changzhou in China, a study nducted by Li [11] highlighted that if the WWR exceeds 60% in hot months, then the oor thermal condition would suffer. This shows that WWR is strongly subjected to the al climate condition (Figures 1 and 2). Even in a cold climate, the use of glazing has to controlled to avoid overheating in the summer months. In winter, passive solar gain is cial to increasing the heat gain with a higher g-value [12]. The study and configuration of WWR should be included in the design stage to imove the energy performance of the building [1]. However, there are other parameters t need to be highlighted that affect energy building performance such as the glazing e and use of shading. In a study conducted by Cesari and Khoukhi [14,15], the results icated that retrofitting may have a major influence on the building's energy pattern as ll as the cost of the energy consumption. It has to be mentioned that orientation is ked to WWR. It controls the amount of solar gain that the building envelope is exposed [16].

Importance and Novelty of This Research
This research will contribute to providing a framework on the optimum window wall ratio (WWR) to be used by architects in the early design stage in hot regions b considering different orientations with a connection to energy consumption. This is cr cial in hot regions. In addition to that, the recommendation on WWR in various climat regions can also be used in existing buildings. Most publications focus on either energ performance or daylight. However, this study links the two variables as they aid th creation of a framework on the ultimate WWR in buildings. Each direction in the buil ing should have its own WWR based on energy consumption as well as the daylig factor. This will improve the indoor environmental quality and also improve the energ performance of the buildings. Figure 3 represent the flow chart of the research of th study.  The study and configuration of WWR should be included in the design stage to improve the energy performance of the building [1]. However, there are other parameters that need to be highlighted that affect energy building performance such as the glazing type and use of shading. In a study conducted by Cesari and Khoukhi [14,15], the results indicated that retrofitting may have a major influence on the building's energy pattern as well as the cost of the energy consumption. It has to be mentioned that orientation is linked to WWR. It controls the amount of solar gain that the building envelope is exposed to [16].

Importance and Novelty of This Research
This research will contribute to providing a framework on the optimum window to wall ratio (WWR) to be used by architects in the early design stage in hot regions by considering different orientations with a connection to energy consumption. This is crucial in hot regions. In addition to that, the recommendation on WWR in various climatic regions can also be used in existing buildings. Most publications focus on either energy performance or daylight. However, this study links the two variables as they aid the creation of a framework on the ultimate WWR in buildings. Each direction in the building should have its own WWR based on energy consumption as well as the daylight factor. This will improve the indoor environmental quality and also improve the energy performance of the buildings. Figure 3 represent the flow chart of the research of this study.

Importance and Novelty of This Research
This research will contribute to providing a framework on the optimum window to wall ratio (WWR) to be used by architects in the early design stage in hot regions by considering different orientations with a connection to energy consumption. This is crucial in hot regions. In addition to that, the recommendation on WWR in various climatic regions can also be used in existing buildings. Most publications focus on either energy performance or daylight. However, this study links the two variables as they aid the creation of a framework on the ultimate WWR in buildings. Each direction in the building should have its own WWR based on energy consumption as well as the daylight factor. This will improve the indoor environmental quality and also improve the energy performance of the buildings. Figure 3 represent the flow chart of the research of this study.

Method and Study Design
The investigated case study in this research is one of the modern high school designs in Saudi Arabia, as presented in Figure 3. This school was previously investigated as it is one of the prototype designs in Saudi Arabia [4]. This study investigated the building envelope of the schools in different climatic zones in Saudi Arabia, specifically hot and dry, hot and humid, and a higher mountain altitude, while taking into consideration

Method and Study Design
The investigated case study in this research is one of the modern high school designs in Saudi Arabia, as presented in Figure 3. This school was previously investigated as it is one of the prototype designs in Saudi Arabia [4]. This study investigated the building envelope of the schools in different climatic zones in Saudi Arabia, specifically hot and dry, hot and humid, and a higher mountain altitude, while taking into consideration variables such as glazing type, building material construction, and air conditioning systems in the schools. The schools investigated were in two climatic zones within Saudi Arabia, specifically in the cities of Riyadh and Abha. The different WWRs were evaluated using the TAS EDSL modelling program (10% and 40%), which is one of the most advanced and widely used software in the simulation of energy and sustainable buildings. Energy load, solar gain, and indoor air temperature were obtained from TAS based on weather data to support the case studies. Figure 3 details the flow chart that was part of the methodology.

Case Study-Building Design
The case study is a prototype school building design (PSBD). All public schools in Saudi Arabia come in the form of a PSBD. The same design is used in all regions of the country regardless of the diversity of the local climate ( Figure 1). This shows the importance of this study, as building design becomes more important when it is used multiple times. The building consists of two storeys. In this study, three classrooms were selected, each one facing a different orientation to investigate the significance of orientation. The schools were visited in summer 2018 for one week.

Study Simulation
In the cities of Riyadh (hot and dry) and Abha (high altitude), the indoor temperature and relative humidity were both analyzed. In addition, different types of glazing were investigated due to its impact in hot regions. The research team, during their visit, noticed that the schools used only single glazing, which is not acceptable in such a climate. As a result, the current study highlights the significance of this decision. It is easy to modify this as part of retrofitting school buildings. The construction of the school and its characteristics have been presented in Table 1. In terms of the thermostat set points, they were 19 • C and 25 • C for heating and cooling, respectively. The selection of a thermostat was based on the acceptable thermal comfort level in the country [17]. The study also used a parametric study of different WWRs ranging from 10% to 40%. This range is determined based on the acceptable window to wall ratio in hot regions. The analysis was focused on energy consumption, indoor air temperature and relative humidity, and daylight analysis.

The Use of a Globe Thermometer
This study used a globe thermometer during the site visits. The aim of this investigation was to support the findings of the study simulation and to provide a detailed monitoring of the current design of the selected classrooms in the schools ( Figure 3). The study used a one-meter grid to place the globe thermometer in order to monitor the impact of glazing size and distance on the globe temperature. This study expected to highlight the impact of solar and outdoor temperature on the indoor climatic condition.

Validation and Calibration
TAS EDSL is used globally to conduct energy simulations. It has been used in abundant publications such as [4,[18][19][20][21][22][23] the studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Austria, Italy, Chile, Poland, and the United Kingdom, respectively. In addition, the software has been validated and calibrated by Alwetaishi several times previously [24,25]. The same prototype, located in Taif city, has been monitored using a data-logger tool to compare the results to the results that were simulated. The internal condition of the software was modified to accommodate the different building types in order to provide accurate results. The major issue was the adjustment of the ventilation and the infiltration of heat loss and gain within the model. Two different operations were validated using the operations of the air conditioning mode and the free running mode (Figure 4), where Figure 5 represent the case study model of school building.

Results and Discussion
Even though Saudi Arabia is considered to be an extremely hot region, there is a diverse climatic condition across the country (Figure 1). The difference between the two cities studied is enormous, which should be reflected in the building design. Regarding the heating and cooling load in the city of Abha, there were a clear heating load in winter ( Figure 6). This is due to the outdoor air temperature, which averages about 15 °C. It was

Results and Discussion
Even though Saudi Arabia is considered to be an extremely hot region, there is a diverse climatic condition across the country ( Figure 1). The difference between the two cities studied is enormous, which should be reflected in the building design. Regarding the heating and cooling load in the city of Abha, there were a clear heating load in winter ( Figure 6). This is due to the outdoor air temperature, which averages about 15 • C. It was noted that each orientation was impacted differently. For instance, the north-facing classroom showed nearly no difference between 10% and 40% WWR due to the absence of direct solar radiation. In contrast, the south-facing classroom was affected dramatically to the extent that in the case of 40% WWR, there was no heating load at all. This indicates the importance of considering the diversity of the WWR in each orientation within the same building. The heat load patterns in spring, summer, and autumn between 10% and 40% WWR were similar, as the position of the sun is also similar. The previous studies proved that in passive solar design, winter is always the first approach to consider. The north-facing zone had the worst scenario while the south-facing had the best scenario, with a zero-heating load at some times of the day and night. This shows that it is important to consider not only the location of the city but also the orientation of each zone within the same building. These findings support the view of [7]. Alwetaishi studied the influence of various orientations on the indoor temperature in Taif city, which has a similar climate to Abha. For winter passive heating, north-facing zones are not as effective as east and west-facing zones where the sun's position allows for direct solar heat gain to take place, and thus the number of north-facing zones should be minimized compared to the other zones. In addition, in summertime, a large glazing area in highland places such as Abha is important to allow for natural ventilation as in summer with a 40% WWR there is no cooling load at all. Based on the discussed findings and upon observing the maximum values of solar heat gain, the WWR for each direction in highland places such as Abha can be stated as follows: 40%, 35%, and 35% in the north, east, and south respectively. This is quite compatible with the findings of the optimum WWR in the city of Taif, which has a similar climate to Abha [7]. Generally, a larger WWR is more acceptable in Abha in winter in terms of a better level of performance. The 40% WWR has resulted in a very low heating load compared to 10%. In addition to that, there is a clear variation in orientations. The south orientation was found to be the easiest facing zone with which to achieve a zero-heating load in winter in comparison with the east and north. In spring, as the outdoor temperature starts to soar, a clear cooling load takes place with no heating load. Due to the direct access to sunlight, the east orientation has the largest cooling load. As a result, the WWR of this classroom has to be precisely designed due to the large amount of cooling in the spring and the low heating in winter. Regarding the energy loads in the city of Riyadh, which is considered to be a hot and arid climate, there is a large cooling load in summer and an adequate heating load in winter. This is due to the harsh outdoor climate which was monitored in two classrooms in the two cities using a globe thermometer. The optimization of the best WWR in such a climate is crucial because of its reverse relationship between summer and winter. It is better for windows to be smaller in summer yet larger in winter to allow for passive solar heating. For instance, it can be noted that southern facing zones have a larger zero heating load in the case of 40% WWR compared to 10%. However, the latter scenario has a larger cooling load compared to the 10% WWR. It is suggested that the maximum size of the WWR in hot and dry places should not overtake 30% in north-facing zones and 25% in both east and south-facing zones.
As far as the influence of WWR on the energy loads is concerned, based on the results presented in Figure 6, there is a general decrease in the heating load in the city of Abha when the WWR gets larger, while there is a clear increase when there is a larger WWR in summer. This varies based on orientation. For instance, the largest drop was found to be in the southern facing classroom CR30, where there was a 9% decrease in energy load while the lowest drop was found to be in the north classroom at only 2%. In contrast, in the city of Riyadh there was a different impact of WWR on energy consumption, as can be seen in  Figure 6. In winter, the influence of the modified WWR was found to be minor, except for in the southern facing classroom where there was a 30% drop in heating load, which allows passive solar heating in winter. This is due to the exposure to direct solar radiation of the south external walls and glazing system. On the other hand, there was a slight impact due to the WWR on the energy load in summer, where there was an approximately 10% increase in the cooling load in all directions. As a result, the modification of WWR is crucial in southern facing zones. In addition, the WWR is an effective passive approach for heating buildings located in areas with a cold winter. This finding supports the work of Detsi [12], which indicates the importance of enhancing the passive heating design in cold regions. Figure 7 shows the impact of solar radiation in different climatic conditions. large cooling load in summer and an adequate heating load in winter. This is due to the harsh outdoor climate which was monitored in two classrooms in the two cities using a globe thermometer. The optimization of the best WWR in such a climate is crucial because of its reverse relationship between summer and winter. It is better for windows to be smaller in summer yet larger in winter to allow for passive solar heating. For instance, it can be noted that southern facing zones have a larger zero heating load in the case of 40% WWR compared to 10%. However, the latter scenario has a larger cooling load compared to the 10% WWR. It is suggested that the maximum size of the WWR in hot and dry places should not overtake 30% in north-facing zones and 25% in both east and south-facing zones.
Heating and Cooling of Abha City 10%, WWR 40%, WWR Winter Spring   As far as the influence of WWR on the energy loads is concerned, based on the results presented in Figure 6, there is a general decrease in the heating load in the city of Abha when the WWR gets larger, while there is a clear increase when there is a larger WWR in summer. This varies based on orientation. For instance, the largest drop was found to be in the southern facing classroom CR30, where there was a 9% decrease in energy load while the lowest drop was found to be in the north classroom at only 2%. In contrast, in the city of Riyadh there was a different impact of WWR on energy consumption, as can be seen in Figure 6. In winter, the influence of the modified WWR was found to be minor, except for in the southern facing classroom where there was a 30% drop in heating load, which allows passive solar heating in winter. This is due to the exposure to direct solar radiation of the south external walls and glazing system. On the other hand, there was a slight impact due to the WWR on the energy load in summer, where there was an approximately 10% increase in the cooling load in all directions. As a result, the modification of WWR is crucial in southern facing zones. In addition, the WWR is an effective passive approach for heating buildings located in areas with a cold winter. This finding supports the work of Detsi [12], which indicates the importance of enhancing the passive heating design in cold regions. Figure 7 shows the impact of solar radiation in different climatic conditions. Additionally, the findings will contribute to the knowledge behind implementing such systems in any climatic regions, including those investigated. Considering the unified design of schools in Saudi Arabia, known as the prototype school building design Additionally, the findings will contribute to the knowledge behind implementing such systems in any climatic regions, including those investigated. Considering the unified design of schools in Saudi Arabia, known as the prototype school building design (PSBD), the findings will aid in improving the quality of this design and the material selection for use in future schools. Unlike the previous studies, the current research explores the influence of the windows' orientation, as explained in Figures 8 and 9. WWR is not the only element that can contribute to the energy performance in buildings. There are many others as well, such as the U-values of the glazing system. Since windows are a major contributor to building heat transfer, it is recommended to determine the type of glazing precisely.
Various U-values were tested in the same condition, and it was found that the modification of the U-value of glazing can have a significant impact on solar heat gain and thus, the total energy consumption in buildings, which can be doubled (Figure 8). It was observed that the type of glazing can double the amount of heat transfer into the indoor built environment, which will have a considerable impact on the indoor temperature as well as the thermal comfort of the students. As classroom C_24 is facing east and is relatively larger than the others, it was noticed that it has a larger amount of solar heat gain compared to the others. Table 2 shows recommended maximum WWR in each climatic zone and orientation, which is based on findings obtained from Tables 3 and 4. nergies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 16 lection for use in future schools. Unlike the previous studies, the current research explores the influence of the windows' orientation, as explained in Figures 8 and 9. WWR is not the only element that can contribute to the energy performance in buildings. There are many others as well, such as the U-values of the glazing system. Since windows are a major contributor to building heat transfer, it is recommended to determine the type of glazing precisely. Various U-values were tested in the same condition, and it was found that the modification of the U-value of glazing can have a significant impact on solar heat gain and thus, the total energy consumption in buildings, which can be doubled ( Figure  8). It was observed that the type of glazing can double the amount of heat transfer into the indoor built environment, which will have a considerable impact on the indoor temperature as well as the thermal comfort of the students. As classroom C_24 is facing east and is relatively larger than the others, it was noticed that it has a larger amount of solar heat gain compared to the others. Table 2 shows recommended maximum WWR in each climatic zone and orientation, which is based on findings obtained from Table 3 and  Table 4.

Highland Regions (Abha) Hot and Dry Regions (Riyadh)
Max WWR in north-facing 40% 30% Max WWR in east-facing 35% 25% Max WWR in south-facing 35% 25%  south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the IAT and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha.     south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the IAT and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha. south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the IAT and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha.     south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the I and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha. south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the IAT and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha. south-facing classroom in Riyadh, (c) is the IAT and RH of C30 in summer for the south-facing classroom in Abha and (d) is the IAT and the RH of C30 in winter for the south-facing classroom in Abha.  The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this stu focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylig According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor enviro ment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2 especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Tab  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in vario orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultim daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the fin ings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will a only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. A result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support t The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this stu focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylig According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor enviro ment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2 especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Ta  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in vario orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultim daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the fin ings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will a only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. A result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table  4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the The work of Alwetaishi [7] suggests a WWR of 20% to 35%. However, this study focused only on energy consumption and it was not clear how this might affect daylight. According to the CIBSE Guide [26], the daylight factor should be between 2% and 5% to provide a suitable amount of natural light indoors based on the type of indoor environment. There is a link between the type of building, daylight, and comfort [27]. Based on the CIBSE Guide, all residential rooms should not have a daylight factor higher than 2%, especially in any bedrooms. However, in classrooms, natural light is required if there is no associated glare, which may cause discomfort. The level of daylight presented in Table 4 shows the amount of daylight considering 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WWR in various orientations in the city of Riyadh. It is clear that the 10% WWR is not sufficient enough to hold activities in the classrooms such as reading. As a result, a WWR ranging from 30% to 35% might be appropriate depending on the orientation in order to provide the ultimate daylight factor combined with optimal building energy efficiency. In addition, the findings of Table 4 highlight that in such a hot region, if the WWR exceeds 20%, it will add only an extra cooling load and the daylight factor will not be affected significantly. As a result, it is not recommended to raise the WWR by more than 20% except in the case of the north orientation to obtain a larger view of the outdoors. These findings support the work of Alwetaishi [4] who suggested that the WWR should not exceed 10% in all directions in the city of Riyadh. However, the work of Alwetaishi did not consider the daylight factor. This study, which has combined the aforementioned with the analysis of daylight, proposes that the WWR should be at least 20% to provide sufficient daylight for the indoor environment socially in buildings such as schools were daytime activities are required.
Based on the findings of this research ( Figure 9) including indoor air temperature, the daylight factor, and energy consumption, it can be mentioned that the maximum WWR in higher altitude locations located in hot regions can be 40%, 35%, and 35% in the north, east, and south while in hot dry locations, it is recommended to be 30%, 20%, and 20% in the same sequence of orientations.

Conclusions
The influence of WWR in a school building was examined under the condition of two different climatic zones in Saudi Arabia, which were hot dry and moderate (high land location). The study used site observations such as the clothing level of the students as well as measurements through the use of a globe thermometer to study the impact of glazing in both locations. In addition, an energy computer simulation was used to analyze various thermal aspects such as the indoor temperature and solar heat gain. Moreover, the study used the daylight plug-in to study the influence of daylight distribution considering the current size of the windows. Although the prototype school building design remains the same in both cities, it was found that the design should be modified at least at the level of the windows with respect of the placement area and material used. In the moderate climate, it was found that a larger WWR is more beneficial in the winter in the south, east, and west facing zones but not on the side of the north, which received a lesser amount of direct solar radiation. This is to encourage the greater exploitation of passive solar heating. The 40% WWR in such a climate aids the zero-heating load in winter, while there was a clear demand for a heating load in the scenario of 10%. The impact of such variation in the WWR between summer and winter for this location was negligible which makes it clear that the larger area for the WWR in a moderate climate is more beneficial considering the variation of each orientation. In a hot and arid climate, the status is different. In Riyadh city, there is a significant and clear heating load in winter and cooling in summer due to the harsh climate. However, the cooling load is more dominant regarding its duration and associated values. Thus, it is more advantageous to have a smaller WWR in most of its zones. This finding is compatible with the research conducted in Riyadh city considering the influence of WWR on the indoor environment [4]. Based on the findings of this research, it can be mentioned that the maximum WWR in moderate and highland locations can be 40%, 35%, and 35% in the north, east, and south while in hot dry locations, it is recommended to be 30%, 25%, and 25% in the same sequence of orientations. In addition to that, for the ultimate results concerning energy consumption and the daylight factor, the WWR should be in the range of 30% to 35%, and this percentage can be higher in high altitude mountains where the outdoor temperatures are less intense.