Development of a High-Flux Solar Simulator for Experimental Testing of High-Temperature Applications

: In the last few years, several studies have been carried out on concentrating solar thermal and thermochemical applications. These studies can be further enhanced by means of high-ﬂux solar simulators (HFSS), since they allow the development of experimental tests under controlled irradiance conditions, regardless of sunshine. In this work, a new high-ﬂux solar simulator, capable of reaching levels of irradiance higher than 100 W/cm 2 (1000 suns), has been designed, built and characterized. This simulator is composed of 8 ellipsoidal specular reﬂectors, arranged face-down on a horizontal plane, in order to irradiate from the upper side any system requiring the simulation of concentrated solar radiation; differently from the HFSSs described in the scientiﬁc literature, this conﬁguration allows the avoidance of any distortion of ﬂuid-dynamic or convective phenomena within the system under investigation. As a ﬁrst step, a numerical analysis of the HFSS has been carried out, simulating each real light source (Xe-arc), having a length of 6.5 mm, as a line of 5 sub-sources. Therefore, the HFSS has been built and characterized, measuring a maximum irradiance of 120 W/cm 2 and a maximum temperature of 1007 ◦ C; these values will be enough to develop experimental tests on lab-scale thermal and thermochemical solar applications.


Introduction
In the last few years, several high-flux solar simulators (HFSS) have been developed for concentrated solar power (CSP) system testing and solar thermochemical analysis, such as testing of components and materials in high-temperature thermo-chemical applications, concentrating photovoltaic applications, etc. [1][2][3][4][5]. These systems are capable of producing a continuous high-power beam of radiation, similar in its characteristics to concentrated solar light. They normally use, as a radiation source, high-power xenon or argon arc lamps, having a spectrum similar to sunlight; appropriate optical reflectors allow to reach level of light concentration comparable to CSP systems [6].
The use of outdoor concentrated solar systems, such as heliostat fields, dish concentrators and solar furnaces for R&D activities is often difficult, due to solar intensity variability. On the other hand, indoor HFSSs have many advantages, such as stable, continuous and controllable irradiance, and not being affected by time, season or climate. For these reasons, the number of HFSSs employed for experimental tests has increased recently.
Petrasch et al. [7] described a HFSS, installed at the Paul Scherner Institute, capable of delivering over 50 kW of radiative power at peak fluxes. It reached an average flux of 6800 kW/m 2 over a 60 mm diameter circular target, corresponding to a stagnation temperature above 3300 K.
Martines-Manuel et al. [8] designed and built a new HFSS for medium/high-temperature solar material testing and solar thermochemical process analysis in Mexico. This system used seven 2.5 kWel Xenon short arc lamps, each close-coupled to a 2 m focal length truncated ellipsoidal specular reflector made of polished aluminum. They estimated a Energies 2021, 14, 3124 3 of 18 The above-described systems have been primarily designed to simulate operating conditions (directional, spatial, and spectral distributions of concentrated radiation) of several solar plants, based on troughs [21][22][23][24], dishes [25,26] and towers [27][28][29], or solar furnaces [30,31], but recently they have gained new interest in direct light absorption, because several studies of solar plants based on nanofluids focused their attention on this topic. De Risi et al. [32] and Potenza et al. [33] studied solar-transparent parabolics through collectors working with gas-based nanofluid, able to directly adsorb solar radiation. They demonstrated how nanoparticles can compensate the relatively low heat transfer coefficient of gaseous fluids with an increase of heat transfer capabilities. Kasaeian et al. [34] investigated the effects of direct solar absorption in parabolic trough collectors with a glassglass absorber tube, by using two different nanofluids. Finally, a recent review article of Farhana et al. [35] described the state of the art in solar collectors based on nanofluids.
Other areas in which HFSSs are finding widespread use are related to raw materials processing [36], ceramic material processing, calcination, etc. [37]. Furthermore, in the last years the production of solar fuels, including hydrogen, which is mainly based on H 2 O/CO 2 splitting and decarbonization processes (cracking, reforming, and gasification of carbonaceous feed-stock) [38][39][40][41] and which can be widely studied by means of HFSS, is finding increasing interest from the scientific and industrial community. In two recent studies Milanese et al. [42,43] proposed a new model of a double-loop fluidized bed solar reactor, involving CeO 2 nanoparticles and two gas streams (N 2 and CO 2 ) for efficient thermochemical fuel production, whose schematic is shown in Figure 1. CPC increased the concentration ratio by a factor of 4.1 at an optical efficiency of 85.4%, and reduced spillage loss from 78.9% to 32.1% and the non-uniformity on the target. The above-described systems have been primarily designed to simulate operating conditions (directional, spatial, and spectral distributions of concentrated radiation) of several solar plants, based on troughs [21][22][23][24], dishes [25,26] and towers [27][28][29], or solar furnaces [30,31], but recently they have gained new interest in direct light absorption, because several studies of solar plants based on nanofluids focused their attention on this topic. De Risi et al. [32] and Potenza et al. [33] studied solar-transparent parabolics through collectors working with gas-based nanofluid, able to directly adsorb solar radiation. They demonstrated how nanoparticles can compensate the relatively low heat transfer coefficient of gaseous fluids with an increase of heat transfer capabilities. Kasaeian et al. [34] investigated the effects of direct solar absorption in parabolic trough collectors with a glass-glass absorber tube, by using two different nanofluids. Finally, a recent review article of Farhana et al. [35] described the state of the art in solar collectors based on nanofluids.
Other areas in which HFSSs are finding widespread use are related to raw materials processing [36], ceramic material processing, calcination, etc. [37]. Furthermore, in the last years the production of solar fuels, including hydrogen, which is mainly based on H2O/CO2 splitting and decarbonization processes (cracking, reforming, and gasification of carbonaceous feed-stock) [38][39][40][41] and which can be widely studied by means of HFSS, is finding increasing interest from the scientific and industrial community. In two recent studies Milanese et al. [42,43] proposed a new model of a double-loop fluidized bed solar reactor, involving CeO2 nanoparticles and two gas streams (N2 and CO2) for efficient thermochemical fuel production, whose schematic is shown in Figure 1. In this system, the overall reaction CO2→CO+1/2 O2 is achieved, by means of a thermochemical two-step cycle, based on CeO2 nanoparticles.
In order to experimentally develop solar thermal and thermochemical applications, in this study a new HFSS has been designed, built and characterized, according to a different geometry with respect to the above-described papers: indeed, the parabolic mirrors In this system, the overall reaction CO 2 →CO+1/2 O 2 is achieved, by means of a thermochemical two-step cycle, based on CeO 2 nanoparticles.
In order to experimentally develop solar thermal and thermochemical applications, in this study a new HFSS has been designed, built and characterized, according to a different geometry with respect to the above-described papers: indeed, the parabolic mirrors were arranged face-down on a horizontal plane to irradiate the system under investigation from the upper side. Furthermore, this configuration can be also be usefully employed in studies of low-concentration direct absorption, where convective phenomena within heat transfer fluids (e.g., nanofluids) can be accurately evaluated only by lighting the specimen from above, avoiding any alteration of the motions in the fluid, with respect to the real case.
The main objective of the present work was to build a HFSS capable of reaching a level of irradiance bigger than 100 W/cm 2 (1000 suns), since this is enough to develop experimental tests on lab-scale high-temperature (>800 • C) solar applications (e.g., fluidized bed solar reactor). Therefore, this paper describes the optical design, fabrication and characterization of a high-flux solar simulator based on an array of Xe-arc lamps with ellipsoidal specular reflectors.

Design of Solar Simulator
The HFSS system consists of eight elliptical reflectors arranged in such a way as to obtain the convergence of the light beams on a target, according to the geometric configuration shown in Figure 2. were arranged face-down on a horizontal plane to irradiate the system under investigation from the upper side. Furthermore, this configuration can be also be usefully employed in studies of low-concentration direct absorption, where convective phenomena within heat transfer fluids (e.g., nanofluids) can be accurately evaluated only by lighting the specimen from above, avoiding any alteration of the motions in the fluid, with respect to the real case.
The main objective of the present work was to build a HFSS capable of reaching a level of irradiance bigger than 100 W/cm 2 (1000 suns), since this is enough to develop experimental tests on lab-scale high-temperature (>800 °C) solar applications (e.g., fluidized bed solar reactor). Therefore, this paper describes the optical design, fabrication and characterization of a high-flux solar simulator based on an array of Xe-arc lamps with ellipsoidal specular reflectors.

Design of Solar Simulator
The HFSS system consists of eight elliptical reflectors arranged in such a way as to obtain the convergence of the light beams on a target, according to the geometric configuration shown in Figure 2.    The geometric characteristics of each reflector are shown in Figure 4, while Figure 5 shows the coating (rhodium) reflectivity as a function of incident light wavelength.  The geometric characteristics of each reflector are shown in Figure 4, while Figure 5 shows the coating (rhodium) reflectivity as a function of incident light wavelength.    The rhodium coating has been chosen due to its very high hardness and high reflectivity, which guarantee the general durability of the system, coupled with good performance.
According to the design configuration, each reflector has been equipped with a short arc lamp mod. OSRAM XBO 4000 W/HSA OFRs are arranged along the axis of the ellipsoidal mirror, whose technical specifications and the photometric solid are shown in Table  1 and Figure 6 respectively.  The rhodium coating has been chosen due to its very high hardness and high reflectivity, which guarantee the general durability of the system, coupled with good performance.
According to the design configuration, each reflector has been equipped with a short arc lamp mod. OSRAM XBO 4000 W/HSA OFRs are arranged along the axis of the ellipsoidal mirror, whose technical specifications and the photometric solid are shown in Table 1 and Figure 6 respectively.  As can be seen in Figure 6b, the Xe-arc spectrum approaches the solar one in the visible range, with the exception of a peak around 480 nm, but in the near-infrared, the discrepancies are more significant. However, it is important to clarify that the main purpose of this work is to realize a HFSS capable of reaching high radiations and high temperatures for thermal and thermochemical solar applications. Therefore, to achieve this, a concentration ratio between 1000 and 2500 suns is required [43] and the infrared radiation peaks between 800 and 1000 nm still remain useful.
For a lamp, the radiation power, , can be calculated as: For the wavelength range of 200-1200 nm and for a nominal electrical power input of 4 kW, reached 2180 W. It was assumed that this value did not vary significantly among the different lamps.

Optical Analysis
The optical analysis was carried out by means of Opticad software [44], taking into account that all light sources were composed of electric arcs of 6.5 mm length. Each lamp has been simulated by discretizing the light source into five sub-sources, arranged at a distance of 1.625 mm from each other in the focus of the mirror. From each source, 21,600 As can be seen in Figure 6b, the Xe-arc spectrum approaches the solar one in the visible range, with the exception of a peak around 480 nm, but in the near-infrared, the discrepancies are more significant. However, it is important to clarify that the main purpose of this work is to realize a HFSS capable of reaching high radiations and high temperatures for thermal and thermochemical solar applications. Therefore, to achieve this, a concentration ratio between 1000 and 2500 suns is required [43] and the infrared radiation peaks between 800 and 1000 nm still remain useful.
For a lamp, the radiation power, P irr , can be calculated as: For the wavelength range of 200-1200 nm and for a nominal electrical power input of 4 kW, P irr reached 2180 W. It was assumed that this value did not vary significantly among the different lamps.

Optical Analysis
The optical analysis was carried out by means of Opticad software [44], taking into account that all light sources were composed of electric arcs of 6.5 mm length. Each lamp has been simulated by discretizing the light source into five sub-sources, arranged at a distance of 1.625 mm from each other in the focus of the mirror. From each source, 21,600 beams with opening angle and intensity compatible with the photometric solid ( Figure 6a) were branched, for a total of 108,000 simulated beams. Table 2 resumes the main parameters of Opticad simulations, while Figures 7-9 show an example of the Opticad simulation, the radiative flux map calculated at focal plane for the lamp n. 1 and the cumulative radiative flux map, calculated at focal plane with all lamps, respectively.       As it can be observed, a lamp showed a maximum calculated irradiance of about 25 W/cm 2 (250 suns), allowing it to reach a theoretical maximum cumulative irradiance with 8 lamps of about 2000 suns. Finally, all radiation is concentrated on a circular surface with a diameter of about 13 cm.

Construction and Alignment of the Solar Simulator
The HFSS has been constructed according to the above-described optical design: Figure 10 shows some pictures of the system.
The solar simulator was equipped with a mobile workbench realized by means of a chilled optical bench (Figure 10d). This solution allowed:  focus/defocusing the light, by moving up and down the workbench, to reach the desired concentration value;  fixing a sample holder with extreme precision using the threaded holes of the optical

Construction and Alignment of the Solar Simulator
The HFSS has been constructed according to the above-described optical design: Figure 10 shows some pictures of the system. In this phase a specific procedure was developed to align all lamps towards the same focal point: 1. all elliptical reflectors were equipped with a 2-axis rotating system; 2. a laser was mounted in the center of the table (Figure 11a  The solar simulator was equipped with a mobile workbench realized by means of a chilled optical bench (Figure 10d). This solution allowed: • focus/defocusing the light, by moving up and down the workbench, to reach the desired concentration value; • fixing a sample holder with extreme precision using the threaded holes of the optical bench.
In this phase a specific procedure was developed to align all lamps towards the same focal point:

1.
all elliptical reflectors were equipped with a 2-axis rotating system; 2.
a laser was mounted in the center of the table (Figure 11a); 3.
a laser beam was pointed towards an elliptical reflector; At the end of the alignment phase, the laser was substituted with the Vatell TG1000 Gardon heat flux sensor, which produces a voltage output when exposed to heat flux. This is based on a differential thermocouple that measures the temperature difference between the center and the circumference of a thin constantan foil disk, mounted into the Oxygen Free High Conductivity copper (OFHC) body of the heat flux gage. When the sensing disk is exposed to a heat source, the center to edge temperature difference produces an output voltage directly proportional to the applied heat flux. The Gardon sensor is mounted on a slide so that it can be moved to the required position ( Figure 12). Its main characteristics are summarized as:
The region of the optical table chosen to be characterized was a square of 20 cm × 20 cm dimensions, having its center coincident with that of the workbench. Within this area, the Gardon sensor was positioned in a grid of points 2.5 cm apart, according to the threaded holes of the optical bench. At the end of the alignment phase, the laser was substituted with the Vatell TG1000 Gardon heat flux sensor, which produces a voltage output when exposed to heat flux. This is based on a differential thermocouple that measures the temperature difference between the center and the circumference of a thin constantan foil disk, mounted into the Oxygen Free High Conductivity copper (OFHC) body of the heat flux gage. When the sensing disk is exposed to a heat source, the center to edge temperature difference produces an output voltage directly proportional to the applied heat flux. The Gardon sensor is mounted on a slide so that it can be moved to the required position ( Figure 12). Its main characteristics are summarized as:
The region of the optical table chosen to be characterized was a square of 20 cm × 20 cm dimensions, having its center coincident with that of the workbench. Within this area, the Gardon sensor was positioned in a grid of points 2.5 cm apart, according to the threaded holes of the optical bench.

Discussion of Results
In order to fully characterize the irradiance on the workbench, several measurements were carried out by varying the electrical power of each lamp between 400 W (10% of the maximum power) and 3600 W (80% of the maximum power), and the height of the workbench between −10 cm and +10 cm (step 5 cm), with respect to the focal plane (assumed to be 0).
Although the Xenon short-arc lamps used in this work were characterized by a maximum power of 4000 W; in order to avoid excessive thermal stress, all experiments were carried out at a power no greater than 3600 W. Table 3 presents the cases of the experimental characterization at which each lamp has been tested: a total of 25 characterizations have been carried out, permuting five values of electrical power with five different workbench heights.  Figure 13 shows an example of irradiance measurement, related to case 13 of Table  3.

Discussion of Results
In order to fully characterize the irradiance on the workbench, several measurements were carried out by varying the electrical power of each lamp between 400 W (10% of the maximum power) and 3600 W (80% of the maximum power), and the height of the workbench between −10 cm and +10 cm (step 5 cm), with respect to the focal plane (assumed to be 0).
Although the Xenon short-arc lamps used in this work were characterized by a maximum power of 4000 W; in order to avoid excessive thermal stress, all experiments were carried out at a power no greater than 3600 W. Table 3 presents the cases of the experimental characterization at which each lamp has been tested: a total of 25 characterizations have been carried out, permuting five values of electrical power with five different workbench heights.  Figure 13 shows an example of irradiance measurement, related to case 13 of Table 3.  Table 3; the numbers #1 ÷ #8 represent the lamps, according to Figure 2; the coordinates are expressed in cm from the center of the workbench.  Table 3; the numbers #1 ÷ #8 represent the lamps, according to Figure 2; the coordinates are expressed in cm from the center of the workbench. As it can be seen, there are significant differences between the lamps, both in terms of position of the point of maximum irradiance and in terms of magnitude of irradiance. These differences are related to the imperfect focusing of each lamp; indeed, a few millimeters of shift between the lamp and elliptical mirror are enough to strongly modify the flux density on the workbench. Figures 14-16 compare the irradiance related to lamp #7 along three different horizontal lines (at 0 cm, + 5 cm and +10 cm) and for five heights (−10 cm, −5 cm, 0 cm, +5 cm and +10 cm) of the workbench. As it can be seen, there are significant differences between the lamps, both in terms of position of the point of maximum irradiance and in terms of magnitude of irradiance. These differences are related to the imperfect focusing of each lamp; indeed, a few millimeters of shift between the lamp and elliptical mirror are enough to strongly modify the flux density on the workbench. Figures 14-16 compare the irradiance related to lamp #7 along three different horizontal lines (at 0 cm, + 5cm and +10 cm) and for five heights (−10 cm, −5 cm, 0 cm, +5 cm and +10 cm) of the workbench. From the graphs in Figure 14, it is possible to deduce various conclusions:  the maximum irradiance point along the central line of the workbench is shifted by 2.5 cm with respect to the zero position: this is due to the imperfect centering of lamp #7;  the radiant flux of the lamp is not proportional to the electrical power: its growth gradient is low for electrical power lower than 20%, then the radiant flux rises quickly up to reach an electrical power of about 60% (2400 W) and finally becomes quite stable;  differently from theoretical calculations, the best workbench height is not a point, but is an area ranged between 0 cm and +5 cm; this is due to the light source, which is not a point but is an arc of few millimeters.  the maximum irradiance reached by the lamp #7 is equal to 23.36 W/cm 2 : this value is in agreement with the numerical results of Figure 8. From the graphs in Figure 14, it is possible to deduce various conclusions: • the maximum irradiance point along the central line of the workbench is shifted by 2.5 cm with respect to the zero position: this is due to the imperfect centering of lamp #7; • the radiant flux of the lamp is not proportional to the electrical power: its growth gradient is low for electrical power lower than 20%, then the radiant flux rises quickly up to reach an electrical power of about 60% (2400 W) and finally becomes quite stable; • differently from theoretical calculations, the best workbench height is not a point, but is an area ranged between 0 cm and +5 cm; this is due to the light source, which is not a point but is an arc of few millimeters. • the maximum irradiance reached by the lamp #7 is equal to 23.36 W/cm 2 : this value is in agreement with the numerical results of Figure 8. The analysis of the graphs in Figures 15 and 16 showed that:  differently from Figure 14, the maximum irradiance is mainly reached along the central line of the workbench (0 cm);  the radiant flux of the lamp is quite proportional to the electrical power;  differently from both theoretical calculations and previous results of Figure 14, the best workbench height is shifted towards +10 cm: also in this case, this result can be explained taking into consideration the imperfect shape and position of the light source;  the radiant flux along the horizontal line +10 cm is bigger than zero, while the numerical results of Figure 8 show values of irradiance equal to zero already over 6 cm: this result demonstrated that the real focalization of the lamp is worse than the theoretical one.  in the peripheral area of the workbench (Figure 16), the irradiance remains quite stable within the range of 1 ÷ 6 suns. Therefore, this area may be useful for the analysis of all low-concentration solar applications. The analysis of the graphs in Figures 15 and 16 showed that: • differently from Figure 14, the maximum irradiance is mainly reached along the central line of the workbench (0 cm); • the radiant flux of the lamp is quite proportional to the electrical power; • differently from both theoretical calculations and previous results of Figure 14, the best workbench height is shifted towards +10 cm: also in this case, this result can be explained taking into consideration the imperfect shape and position of the light source; • the radiant flux along the horizontal line +10 cm is bigger than zero, while the numerical results of Figure 8 show values of irradiance equal to zero already over 6 cm: this result demonstrated that the real focalization of the lamp is worse than the theoretical one. • in the peripheral area of the workbench (Figure 16), the irradiance remains quite stable within the range of 1 ÷ 6 suns. Therefore, this area may be useful for the analysis of all low-concentration solar applications.  Finally, Figure 17 shows the maximum irradiance reached on the workbench when all lamps are switched on, at 40% of power (1600 W) and at maximum power of 3600 W, respectively.
As can be seen, the maximum experimental irradiance of the HFSS was about 60% of the numerical values (Figure 9), reaching the value of 120.8 W/cm 2 . This level of light concentration is lower than the theoretical one, due to different issues:  small alignment errors of the lamps;  micro-imperfections of the mirrors;  in order to avoid excessive stress, the experimental characterization was carried out, with a maximum electrical power of 3600 W for lamp (equal to 80% of the maximum power of 4000 W);  the radiation, measured by Gardon sensor, is not punctual, but is averaged over its sensitive surface, equal to 126 mm 2 .
Finally, it is important to remark that the maximum measured irradiance of the HFSS, although lower than the theoretical one, is enough to develop experimental tests on labscale high-temperature solar reactors. Finally, Figure 17 shows the maximum irradiance reached on the workbench when all lamps are switched on, at 40% of power (1600 W) and at maximum power of 3600 W, respectively. This result has been confirmed by measuring the temperature reached on the workbench at the point of maximum irradiance for different levels of power: from 10% to 80% ( Figure 18). As can be seen, the maximum experimental irradiance of the HFSS was about 60% of the numerical values (Figure 9), reaching the value of 120.8 W/cm 2 . This level of light concentration is lower than the theoretical one, due to different issues: • small alignment errors of the lamps; • micro-imperfections of the mirrors; • in order to avoid excessive stress, the experimental characterization was carried out, with a maximum electrical power of 3600 W for lamp (equal to 80% of the maximum power of 4000 W); • the radiation, measured by Gardon sensor, is not punctual, but is averaged over its sensitive surface, equal to 126 mm 2 .
Finally, it is important to remark that the maximum measured irradiance of the HFSS, although lower than the theoretical one, is enough to develop experimental tests on labscale high-temperature solar reactors.
This result has been confirmed by measuring the temperature reached on the workbench at the point of maximum irradiance for different levels of power: from 10% to 80% ( Figure 18). This result has been confirmed by measuring the temperature reached on the workbench at the point of maximum irradiance for different levels of power: from 10% to 80% ( Figure 18). As it can be observed, with a power equal to 10%, a temperature of 769 °C was reached, while with the maximum power of 80%, the temperature reached 1007 °C. Higher temperatures have not been reached because of thermal dispersions due both to convective phenomena (the inside of the simulator is constantly cooled by fans to avoid excessive overheating) and to radiation of heated surfaces (which is proportional to T 4 ). However, with all lamps turned on at maximum power, the area of the workbench above 800 °C is larger than 100 cm 2 and is therefore sufficient to perform experimental tests on lab-scale thermal and thermochemical solar applications.

Conclusions
This work aimed to design, built and characterize a new HFSS, capable of reaching a level of irradiance bigger than 100 W/cm 2 (1000 suns), in which the parabolic mirrors were arranged face-down on a horizontal plane, to irradiate different concentrating solar thermo-chemical systems (e.g., fluidized bed for thermochemical fuel production, lowconcentration direct absorption systems, etc.) from the upper side.
In the first part of this study, an optical analysis has been carried out by means of Opticad: all light sources, being constituted by electric arcs of length equal to 6.5 mm, have been simulated as five sub-sources, arranged at a distance of 1.625 mm from each other, As it can be observed, with a power equal to 10%, a temperature of 769 • C was reached, while with the maximum power of 80%, the temperature reached 1007 • C. Higher temperatures have not been reached because of thermal dispersions due both to convective phenomena (the inside of the simulator is constantly cooled by fans to avoid excessive overheating) and to radiation of heated surfaces (which is proportional to T 4 ). However, with all lamps turned on at maximum power, the area of the workbench above 800 • C is larger than 100 cm 2 and is therefore sufficient to perform experimental tests on lab-scale thermal and thermochemical solar applications.

Conclusions
This work aimed to design, built and characterize a new HFSS, capable of reaching a level of irradiance bigger than 100 W/cm 2 (1000 suns), in which the parabolic mirrors were arranged face-down on a horizontal plane, to irradiate different concentrating solar thermo-chemical systems (e.g., fluidized bed for thermochemical fuel production, lowconcentration direct absorption systems, etc.) from the upper side.
In the first part of this study, an optical analysis has been carried out by means of Opticad: all light sources, being constituted by electric arcs of length equal to 6.5 mm, have been simulated as five sub-sources, arranged at a distance of 1.625 mm from each other, in the focus of the mirror. From each lamp, a total of 108,000 beams have been simulated. As a result, maximum numerical irradiance values of about 25 W/cm 2 (250 suns) and 200 W/cm 2 (2000 suns) were reached with one lamp and eight lamps, respectively. Therefore, the HFSS was built and characterized, measuring a maximum experimental irradiance of 120.8 W/cm 2 , coupled with a maximum temperature of 1007 • C, powering the lamps at 80% of their maximum power: these values of irradiance and temperature will be enough to develop experimental tests on lab-scale thermal and thermochemical solar applications.