E ﬃ ciency Optimization for All-Silicon Carbide (SiC) PWM Rectiﬁer Considering the Impact of Gate-Source Voltage Interference

: Compared with conventional silicon (Si)-based Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) rectiﬁers, PWM rectiﬁers based on silicon carbide (SiC) Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-E ﬀ ect Transistors (MOSFETs) have signiﬁcant technical advantages and broad application prospects in terms of e ﬃ ciency and power density, inherited from the high-speed switching feature. However, high-speed switching also induces gate-source voltage interference, which impacts the overall character of the conversion system. This paper considered the impact of gate-source voltage interference on loss, revealing an e ﬃ ciency optimization for all-SiC PWM rectiﬁers. Firstly, this paper theoretically investigated the mechanism of improving the conversion system e ﬃ ciency by using the 4-pin Kelvin packaged SiC MOSFETs. Then, based on the industrial product case study, loss distribution, using di ﬀ erent package styles, was quantitatively analyzed. Finally, experiment test results veriﬁed the e ﬃ ciency improvement of the PWM rectiﬁer with the 4-pin Kelvin package SiC MOSFETs.


Introduction
Owing to the advantages of high power factor, low harmonic distortion, and bi-directional power flow, Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) rectifiers attract much attention from academia since their emergence and are widely used in industrial areas, such as renewable power generation [1,2], railway power supply [3,4], and electric vehicle (EV) charging [5,6]. The physical characteristics of semiconductor devices affect the performance of PWM rectifiers, while the conventional silicon (Si)-based semiconductor power devices have gradually reached their limits [7].
The rapid development and commercialization of wide-bandgap power semiconductor devices, represented by silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) devices, has brought the opportunity for technical innovation [8][9][10]. In general, the energy gap, breakdown electric field, thermal conductivity, melting point, and electron velocity of wide-bandgap material is higher than those of conventional Si material [11][12][13][14][15]. Those features enable semiconductor power devices based on wide-bandgap material to operate at a higher voltage and higher frequency than conventional Si devices [10]. Among the wide-bandgap power semiconductor devices, SiC Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs) are mainly used for high-voltage and high-power applications, for example, fast and ultra-fast EV charging [9]. However, the gate-source voltage interference, induced by the fast switching speed, blocks the further release of the performance of SiC MOSFETs. Fast switching could reduce switching loss and improve efficiency. However, if the additional power loss contributed by the power supply. Figure 1 shows its product appearance and its position in the fast-charging system. "GPT-M-750V/40A-FN2" is a type of high-efficiency and high-power density AC/DC charging power converter module, which has completed the commercial mass production. The rated input voltage is three-phase 270 V AC~450 V AC, while the rated output voltage is 750 V DC with a maximum of 30 kW output power. The power module adopts a Controller Area Network (CAN) communication interface designed in isolation, and CAN communication protocol is adopted for the communication with the monitor. Through the monitor, the power module can achieve functions, such as voltage regulation, current limitation, single-module switching, and so on. The major technical specifications of the all-SiC power module are listed in Table 1. The all-SiC power module "GPT-M-750V/40A-FN2" has intelligent input and output characteristics, as well as temperature adaptability. When the input voltage is between 320 Volt Alternating Current (VAC) and 450 VAC, the power module can output the maximum power. When the input voltage is between 270 VAC and 320 VAC, the power module will limit its output with a linear drop. When the input voltage is less than 270 VAC or larger than 450 VAC, the power module will decrease to 0. When the ambient temperature is below 65 • C, the module can output the maximum power. When the ambient temperature is above 65 • C, the power module will limit its output with a linear drop. At 75 • C ambient temperature, the output power of the power module decreases to 0.   Figure 1 also shows the outlook of the fast EV charging pile, with many PWM power modules to share the load for high-power and fast charging; also, it gives the topology of the all-SiC power module. PWM rectifier is the critical component to rectify AC power into DC power, which composes the first stage of the power module. The typical topology of all-SiC PWM rectifiers is also shown in Figure 1. It converts three-phase alternating current (AC) source V a , V b , V c to direct current (DC) load V dc by filter inductors and power semiconductor devices. It adopts a three-phase six-switch structure, and each phase is composed of a filter inductor and a phase-leg circuit, composed of SiC MOSFETs. On the AC side, the PWM rectifier possesses the function of power factor correction. On the DC side, the PWM rectifier would hold the V dc constant to supply the second-stage, which is an LLC resonant converter, functioned for further EV charging control with isolation for safety.
The framework diagram of the all-SiC PWM power module system is shown in Figure 2, and the system mainly composed of protection device, electromagnetic interference (EMI) filter, PWM rectifier, LLC resonant converter, drive circuits, a microcontroller unit (MCU), cooling fans, and auxiliary power supply (APS). On the right side of Figure 2, half of the power module is given to give more information. It shows the location of the PWM rectifier, while the LLC resonant converter and other components are in the other half of the power module cabinet, which is not given because of space reason. Among the PWM rectifier, the power device, realized by the SiC MOSFET, is the key to improve the character.
The all-SiC power module "GPT-M-750V/40A-FN2" had intelligent input and output characteristics, as well as temperature adaptability. It had the conditions of large-scale production and engineering practice. However, under further research and development, considering the fast switching characteristics of SiC devices, all-SiC power modules still have room for technical optimization.

The Impact of Gate-Source Voltage Interference on Loss and Its Suppression Method
At present, a large share of commercial high-power SiC MOSFETs is packaged in a 3-pin. Figure 3a shows the corresponding parasitic parameters of the bridge circuit, which is one phase circuit of the PWM rectifier and its driving circuit. The bridge circuit mainly consists of power devices Q H and Q L . The parasitic parameters mainly include: 1) parasitic capacitance of SiC MOSFETs C gs , C gd , C ds and gate drive resistance R g , which are determined by the physical characteristics of the device; 2) parasitic inductance of SiC MOSFETs pins and board L g , L d , L s , which is determined by the device pins and the design of hardware circuit.
The driving circuit of SiC MOSFETs includes driver integrated circuits (IC), drive resistance R, and gate shunt capacitance C a , which is used to suppress the gate-source voltage spike during the switching process.
V gs is the internal driving voltage on C gs , V GS is the external driving voltage, i g is the gate current, and i d is the drain current of the device. V D is the driver IC output voltage. C dc is the DC side capacitance. D is the equivalent inverse parallel diode of MOSFETs.
The parasitic inductance of the gate mainly affects the gate-source circuit and is designed to be as small as possible to reduce gate-source voltage spike and mislead. If the parasitic inductance of the drain is too large, it will cause oscillation of the main power current and voltage, so the inductance should be designed as small as possible.
The source parasitic inductance L s affects both the main power circuit and the driving circuit. For the source parasitic inductor of 3-pin SiC MOSFETs, the induced electromotive force caused by the rapid change of the main power current (di/dt) is opposite to the driving voltage, suppresses the gate-source voltage change, and increases the switching loss.
One of the methods to improve system efficiency is using 4-pin Kelvin packaged SiC MOSFETs for PWM rectifiers. The corresponding parasitic parameters of the bridge circuit and its driving circuit are shown in Figure 3b, which provides an additional connection to the source (Kelvin connection).
In the circuit composed of 4-pin package SiC MOSFETs, the source parasitic inductance of driving circuit and the main power circuit is separated, which are, respectively, driving source inductance L ds and power source inductance L ps . The 4-pin package with Kelvin source delivers a less-disturbed signal to the gate of SiC MOSFET, eliminating the effect of the voltage drops over the source parasitic inductance during fast current change. Hence, it has the potential to improve the efficiency of the overall power conversion system, such as the fast EV charging system given in Figure 1. The system efficiency improvement would be explained with the system dynamic theory and then demonstrated with experimental results, in the following sections.

The Mechanism of 4-pin SiC MOSFETs to Improve System Efficiency
The mechanism of 4-pin Kelvin package SiC MOSFETs can suppress the interference of gate-source voltage and improve the efficiency of all-SiC PWM rectifier and is theoretically investigated.

Analysis of Switching Process of 3-pin SiC MOSFETs
The current flow of general 3-pin SiC MOSFET during switching is shown in Figure 4. The parasitic capacitance C gs of SiC MOSFETs is charged, and V gs increases at the turn-on process. C gs is discharged, and V gs decreases at the turn-off process. Figure 5 shows the waveforms changes during SiC MOSFET switching, and the turn-on process can be divided into four stages (stage 1~stage 4) as follows [27]. Stage 1 (t 0~t1 ): turn-on delays, drive voltage V D increases from low-level V dn to high-level V dp , and the current i g mainly charges C gs , and a part of current flows through C gd , while the gate-source voltage V gs increases. However, the gate-source voltage is less than the threshold voltage V gsth , and power devices are in the off-state. When V gs reaches V gsth , the stage will be finished. I on is the sustained current when the power device is on-state. V DS is the extern voltage on the device Q and the parasitic parameter L d and L s . For 3-pins, the equivalent relationship between the gate-source voltage V gs_3p and V GS exists in Equation (1).
The drive current i g , the main loop current i d , the charge current i ca of the capacitor C a , drive voltage V D , and the extern gate-source voltage V GS satisfy the relationships in Equation (2). C iss is the equivalent input capacitance of the SiC MOSFET. V gs_3P can be solved from Equations (1) and (2).
Stage 2 (t 1~t2 ): SiC MOSFET is in on-state, and inductor current converts from negative device to positive device, driving voltage at a high level. Channel current i ch is similar to drain current i d . The V gs increases to the Miller voltage, and the current charges to C gs and C gd . Equation (3) can be derived.
The main power current i d increases approximately linearly and is proportional to the growth rate of V gs , and g fs is the transconductance of i ds and V gs .
Combining Equations (2) and (3), the simplified relationship between V gs_3p and drive voltage V D can be derived as Equation (4).
The high-order (third-order) component of the V gs_3p denominator is small enough to be omitted. The high-order (first-order and second-order) components of the V gs_3p numerator are far smaller than V D . Hence, V gs_3p can be simplified as Equation (5).
It can be approximately equivalent to a second-order system, where the damping coefficient ξ 1 and resonance frequency ω n1 are shown in Equation (6).
To reduce the risk of SiC MOSFETs damage, the extern driver resistor R usually takes a considerable value of 5~20 Ω, and the system works at the overdamped condition. t rgsβ_3p is the time of stage 2 of the turn-on process, and under this overdamped condition, t rgsβ_3p is expressed by Equation (7).
Stage 3 (t 2~t3 ): Conversion of the inductor current is finished, and the negative device begins block voltage. The V gs is on the miller voltage platform and becomes stable, the current i g and the main power current i d are unchanged, V ds decreases linearly, and the current i g charges to C gd .
Because V ds of active device Q decreases, the complementary device begins to form blocking voltages V DA by the difference of i d and I L . The theoretical analysis can establish Equation (8), and V gs_3p can be solved.
Stage 4 (t 3~t4 ): The V gs increases from the miller voltage to drive high-level voltage, and the current charges to C gs and C gd . The relationship between variables satisfies the Equations (1) and (2). When V gs equals to V D , the turn-on process is finished.
During the turn-off process, the changes in each waveform are similar to that of the turn-on process, as shown in Figure 5b. The paper will not elaborate due to the space limit.
In the turn-on process, the loss mainly occurs in stages 2 and 3, which is the period from the threshold voltage of the gate capacitor to the end of the Miller platform. The length of the turn-on time mainly depends on the drive circuit's effect on the SiC MOSFETs charging process.
The main difference between 4-pin SiC MOSFETs and 3-pin SiC MOSFETs is the source inductance of the drive circuit. The gate drive resistance R and gate parallel capacitor C a are the same.

Analysis of Switching Process of 4-pin Kelvin Package SiC MOSFETs
For 4-pin SiC MOSFETs, the switching process is similar to 3-pin SiC MOSFETs, and it is the only difference that 4-pin SiC MOSFETs eliminate the effect of the voltage drops over the source parasitic inductance for Kelvin package. So, only stage 2 of the turn-on process and stage 3 of the turn-off process are different between 4-pin and 3-pin package SiC MOSFETs.
Then, stage 2 of the turn-on process for 4-pin SiC MOSFET is illustrated as an example.
The current flow during switching is shown in Figure 6. There is an equivalent relationship between the gate voltage V gs_4p and V GS in Equation (9). The drive current i g , the main loop current i d , and the extern gate voltage V GS still satisfy the relationships in Equation (2).
Combining Equations (2) and (9), a simplified relational expression of V gs_4p and V D can be obtained as Equation (10). Moreover, the high order (third-order) component is small enough to be omitted as Equation (11).
(1 + sRC a ) 1 + sC iss R g + sL g + sL ds + sRC iss (10) V gs_4p ≈ V D 1 + s R g C iss + RC a + RC iss + s 2 RC a C iss R g + C iss L g + C iss L ds (11) In Equation (11), the variate L ds replaces L s in Equation (5), which are both the driver circuit stray inductance. Compared to the gate-source voltage of 3-pin SiC MOSFET, the difference lies in variates g fs and L s , see Equation (5) and Equation (11). The drive circuit of SiC MOSFETs can also be approximately equivalent to a second-order system, where the damping coefficient ξ 2 and resonance frequency ω n2 are shown in Equation (12).
√ RC a C iss R g +C iss L g +C iss L ds (12) t rgs_4pβ is the time of stage 2 of the turn-on process for 4-pin SiC MOSFETs. When the system is under the overdamped conditions, the rise time t rgsβ_4p is derived as Equation (13).
The above-mentioned analysis shows the waveforms change during SiC MOSFET switching has a second-order system feature; hence, the difference owing to the package can be explained and demonstrated with the system dynamic theory.

Efficiency Improvement Analysis
The SiC MOSFETs with different package appeals to different second-order system characteristics, as given in Equations (6) and (12), for 3-pin and 4-pin package, respectively. It can be obtained that resonance frequency ω n2 (4-pin package) is larger than ω n1 (3-pin package), while the damping coefficient ξ 2 (4-pin package) is less than ξ 1 (3-pin package). This dynamic system feature is shown in Equations (14) and (15). ω n2 > ω n1 (14) Furthermore, according to Equations (7) and (13), it can be concluded that 4-pin SiC MOSFETs have a short period of stage 2, (t 1~t2 ) in Figure 5, compared to the 3-pin counterparts. Thus, we can get: This period difference in stage 2 is mainly caused by the changing of current during this stage, which provides a delay effect for 3-pin package MOSFETs. As no current variation appeals in stage 1, hence, the period of stage 1 is the same, both for 3-pin and 4-pin packaged SiC MOSFETs. In this case, for the whole turn-on process, the rising time, the sum of stage 1 and stage 2, the rise time of a 4-pin package is less than that of the 3-pin package, as in Equation (17).
Similarly, during the turn-off process, the fall time of a 4-pin package is less than that of the 3-pin package, as in Equation (18).
In summary, the turn-on and turn-off processes of the SiC MOSFET has a second-order system feature. Further investigation on this second-order system shows that the switching time (both rise time and fall time) of 4-pin SiC MOSFET is less than the switching time of 3-pin SiC MOSFETs.

Loss Model Considering the Impact of Gate-Source Voltage Interference
The loss model considering the impact of gate-source voltage interference is established to analyze the loss of all-SiC PWM rectifier and the efficiency improvement brought by the 4-pin Kelvin Package SiC MOSFET.
The total loss E tot of all-SiC MOSFET PWM rectifiers, in Equation (19), mainly consists of SiC MOSFET loss E Q , magnetic component loss E L , and other loss E others . E others mainly include the loss of cooling fans, microprogrammed control unit (MCU), driver circuits, and auxiliary power supply (APS). It is easy to make the value of line resistance and stray inductance on the circuit board minimal by design, and the loss is much smaller than that of SiC MOSFET and magnetic components, which is generally ignored.
At first, the general loss model of the 3-pin SiC MOSFET and magnetic components are established. Then, the loss model of 4-pin Kelvin Package SiC MOSFETs is developed to demonstrate the impact of gate-source voltage interference on power loss.

General Loss Model of 3-pin SiC MOSFETs
SiC MOSFETs loss can be divided into static loss and switching loss. The main factors affecting their static loss are on-state current, junction temperature, and switching duty cycle; the main factors affecting their switching loss are drain current, junction temperature, driving resistance, parasitic capacitance, and pin parasitic inductance. The cut-off loss and driving power loss of SiC MOSFETs account for a tiny proportion and can be ignored. Therefore, the loss E Q of SiC MOSFETs mainly includes the on-state loss E CQ , its anti-parallel diode conduction loss, and the switching loss E SWQ .
The on-state loss E CQ of the PWM rectifier is Equation (2), the average loss is calculated with one power frequency period, R ds(on) is the on-state resistance, f is the Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation (SVPWM) frequency, and T is the SVPWM period. V F (t) and i F (t) are, respectively, the voltage drop and current when diode D is on-state. DC Q (t) and DC D (t) are, respectively, the conduction duty cycle of MOSFET Q and its anti-parallel diode D.
The switching loss E SWQ of the PWM rectifier is Equation (22), considering the conversion of the turn-off voltage, turn-on current, and driving resistance of the device.
In the Equation (22), the average loss is calculated with a power frequency period T, f sw is the switching frequency, and E on and E off are the energy loss of the SiC MOSFET turn-on and turn-off once. E rr is the reverse recovery loss of the antiparallel diode. V dc and i(t) are the turn-off voltage and the turn-on current of the SiC MOSFET, respectively. R g is the driving resistance, and V dc * , I dc * , and R g * are the test conditions for the E on and E off values, which can be acquired from the device datasheet. N is the ratio of carrier frequency f z and SVPWM frequency f, and η is the switching loss ratio, applying the five-segment SVPWM, whose switching loss could be reduced about 1/3 [28]. E rr is the reverse recovery loss of anti-parallel diode D in one switching cycle.

General Loss Model of Magnetic Components
The loss of magnetic components in an all-SiC PWM rectifier mainly refers to the loss E L of the AC power side filter inductor, which is divided into copper loss E CuL and iron loss E FeL . As is seen in Equation (4), copper loss refers to the loss caused by the equivalent resistance of the inductor, and iron loss refers to the core loss of the inductor.
The expression of copper loss is shown in Equation (24), where R L is the equivalent resistance of the inductor.
The expression of iron loss is shown in Equation (25), which is composed of hysteresis loss E hL , eddy current loss E cL , and residual loss E rL . At low frequencies, core loss is mainly caused by hysteresis loss, but at high frequencies, not less than 30kHz, the eddy current loss and residual loss are much more notable than the hysteresis loss. Therefore, the core loss can be estimated as Equation (25).
where η is a loss coefficient, f SW is a switching frequency, B m is magnetic induction strength of the core, and V is the volume of the core. α and β are frequencies and magnetic induction loss coefficients more significant than 1, respectively. The values of η, α, and β can be found in the technical manual of the core manufacturer.

Loss Model of 4-pin Kelvin Package SiC MOSFETs
In the general loss model of 3-pin SiC MOSFET, the turn-on energy E on and turn-off energy E off of datasheet test condition usually consists of the impact of gate-source voltage interference.
When the operation condition is the same, the switching loss is approximately proportional to switch time for 4-pin SiC MOSFETs and 3-pin SiC MOSFETs. Then, the turn-on loss of 4-pin SiC MOSFET can be derived by Equation (26) and the turn-off loss by Equation (27).
E on_xp and E off_xp are turn-on energy and turn-off energy. t rgs_xp and t fgs_xp are the turn-on process and turn-off process for x-pin SiC MOSFETs, and the value of x is 3 or 4.
In conclusion, due to the existence of Kelvin source in 4-pin SiC MOSFETs, the di/dt of the main power circuit no longer affects the change of driving voltage, and the damping coefficient is reduced. It makes the dynamic process faster and shortens the duration of the switching process, as given in Equations (17) and (18). Hence, the switching loss of 4-pin SiC MOSFET is smaller than that of the 3-pin SiC MOSFET, and the power module's efficiency would be improved using 4-pin SiC MOSFETs. In the following section, the loss model would be used to analyze the loss distribution in the PWM rectifier.

Experiments
Based on the PWM rectifier in all-SiC power module "GPT-M-750V/40A-FN2" (see to Figure 1), denoted as the 3-pin SiC MOSFET version in the following part, the new version of PWM rectifier based on 4-pin SiC MOSFETs was developed. In this section, we have compared those two versions of the PWM rectifier to explain the conversion system's improvement owing to the mitigation of parasitic gate-source interference. Figure 7 shows the outlook and the PCB layouts of the PWM rectifiers' part, including a zoomed-in figure for both the 3-pin version and the 4-pin version. The component types are shown in Table 2. The 3-pin and 4-pin MOSFETs had the same bare die, with 40 mΩ on-resistance and 1200 V withstand voltage.  The rated parameters of the PWM converter are summarized in Table 3. Except for the power device package, the other circuit designs were consistent. The AC input voltage was 380 V 50 Hz, the rated output voltage was 750 V, and the rated power was 30 kW. The switching frequency of SiC devices used in the prototypes was 30 kHz.  Figure 8 shows the experiment result of the PWM rectifier at 30 kW, full-load point. V GS is the gate-source voltage of one of the SiC MOSFETs in the rectifier. Moreover, I L is the current of its filter inductance, which is also the input AC current. The prototype adopted the optimized SVPWM method, with a 120 • no-switch-action zone shown on the V GS waveform. Figure 8a shows the waveforms from the 3-pin version of the PWM rectifier, and Figure 8b shows the waveforms from the 4-pin version. Both the 3-pin version and the 4-pin version operated as designed, as given on the left of Figure 8a,b. On the right side, the zoomed-in areas of the waveforms show the details of the gate-source voltage V GS . After the falling edge, the V GS waveform showed a positive spike interference; Before the rising edge, the V GS waveform showed a negative spike interference. In Figure 8b, we took the negative spike as an example to further zoom-in and compared it with the 3-pin version's V GS waveform. The waveform showed about 3 V decreased spike, at this time point, by using 4-pin packaged SiC MOSFETs.
The loss distribution of 3-pin version all-SiC PWM rectifier is shown in Figure 9. The switching loss of the SiC MOSFETs accounted for the most significant proportion of the total loss, over 1/3, both at full-load 30 kW and half-load 15 kW. E tot is the total loss of PWM rectifier, and P is the operation power. At half-load, the total loss shared 2.2% of the operation power. At full-load, the total loss shared 2.6% of the operation power. The share of switching loss was 42% at half-load and 36% at full-load. The technical parameters used in the 4-pin SiC MOSFETs PWM rectifier were consistent with 3-pin SiC MOSFETs PWM rectifier, as shown in Table 2. Moreover, the loss distribution of the 4-pin SiC MOSFETs PWM rectifier is shown in Figure 10. Like the 3-pin version, the switching loss of the SiC MOSFETs accounted for the most significant proportion of the total loss, over 1/3, both at full-load 30 kW and half-load 15 kW. Meanwhile, the portion of switching loss was less than that of the 3-pin version. The share of switching loss was 36% at half-load and 34% at full-load.  The switching loss was more than 1/3 of total loss at half-load and full-load conditions for all-SiC PWM rectifiers, and it had become the crucial factor for the efficiency.

2.
The PWM rectifier using the 4-pin SiC MOSFETs had a reduced total loss under 15 kW and 30 kW conditions than 3-pin SiC MOSFETs. The loss was reduced by about 0.2% at 15 kW and about 0.1% at 30 kW. 3.
The switching loss proportion of 4-pin SiC MOSFETs PWM rectifier was less than 3-pin SiC MOSFETs (6% less at 15 kW and 2% less at 30 kW). Figure 11 was obtained by measuring the efficiency of 3-pin and 4-pin SiC MOSFET PWM rectifiers, including the cooling fans and auxiliary power supply (APS), at different power conditions, ranged from light-load to full-load. The experimental results showed the efficiency improvement, introducing 4-pin Kelvin package SiC MOSFETs. The efficiency was increased by about 0.5% (20 W) at 4 kW, and the efficiency was increased by about 0.1% (30 W) at 30 kW at full-load. The peak efficiency, using 4-pin SiC MOSFET, was as high as 97.93%, which was 0.16% higher than the peak efficiency of the 3-pin-based PWM rectifier.

Conclusions
For the fast EV charging application, this paper considered the impact of gate-source voltage interference on the power loss, revealing an efficiency optimization for all-SiC PWM rectifiers. It introduced theoretical analysis and experimental verification to investigate efficiency optimization, using 4-pin Kelvin packaged SiC MOSFETs. The obtained results are summarized as follows: 1.
The rapid change of the main power current (di/dt) induced an electromotive force on the source parasitic inductance of the 3-pin SiC MOSFET, which was opposite to the driving voltage, suppressing the gate-source voltage change and increasing the switching loss.

2.
The mechanism of improving system efficiency by using the 4-pin Kelvin packaged SiC MOSFETs was theoretically investigated. The drive circuit of SiC MOSFETs could be approximately equivalent to a second-order system, and the switching time could be derived. Moreover, the switching time of 4-pin SiC MOSFETs was theoretically less than that of general 3-pin SiC MOSFETs. 3.
The loss model of all-SiC PWM rectifier was established by considering the impact of gate-source voltage interference. The switching loss of 4-pin SiC MOSFETs was smaller than 3-pin SiC MOSFETs, so the total loss of the PWM rectifier was decreased, and the system efficiency was improved.

4.
Based on the industrial product case study, two 30 kW all-SiC PWM rectifier versions were investigated, using 3-pin SiC MOSFETs and 4-pin SiC MOSFETs, respectively. The switching loss was more than 1/3 of the total loss for both of the rectifiers. However, the switching loss proportion of 4-pin SiC MOSFETs PWM rectifier was less than 3-pin SiC MOSFETs (6% less at 15 kW and 2% less at 30 kW). 5.
4-pin Kelvin package SiC MOSFETs improved the efficiency of the PWM rectifier. Experiment results showed that the efficiency was increased by about 0.5% (20 W) maximally at 4 kW, and about 0.1% (30 W) at 30 kW full-load. The peak efficiency of the PWM rectifier, using 4-pin SiC MOSFETs, was as high as 97.93%, which was 0.16% higher than the peak efficiency of the 3-pin SiC MOSFETs-based PWM rectifier.