Voltage Reduction in Medium Voltage Distribution Systems Using Constant Power Factor Control of PV PCS

: Reverse power ﬂow from a photovoltaic (PV) system in a distribution system causes a voltage rise. A relative study regarding the reduction in the distribution feeder voltage depending on system conditions and the magnitude of reverse power ﬂow has been conducted. Several methods for mitigating voltage rise have been proposed; however, the inﬂuence of these methods on the voltage in the distribution system, where the voltage is reduced due to reverse power ﬂow, remains to be determined. In this study, the e ﬀ ect of constant power factor control in low-voltage PV systems, which are widely used as voltage rise countermeasures in distribution systems, was analyzed under the condition that the distribution line voltage decreases due to reverse power ﬂow. Consequently, the constant power factor control of the low-voltage distribution system was found to adversely reduce voltage in the medium voltage distribution system due to the consumption of lagging reactive power by the PV systems.


Introduction
Increasing the use of renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaic (PV) systems and wind turbines, can help reduce CO 2 emission. However, the amount of renewable energy sources and weather conditions can degrade the power quality, such as voltage violations in a power grid. In a distribution system that supplies electric power in medium voltage (MV) and low-voltage (LV) power systems, the voltage rise due to the generation of renewable energy sources is one of the power quality issues [1]. Various studies have been conducted regarding countermeasures for the voltage rise using a control device introduced into the distribution system. Upgrading the existing distribution system by larger cables to reduce impedance or a larger voltage system is one of the basic countermeasures for the voltage rise. In a previous study [2], the optimal tap position of the on-load tap changer (OLTC) was determined based on the measurement of load current and distributed generator output power. A static var compensator (SVC) installed in the LV system can mitigate the voltage rise due to the PV system [3]. Regarding PV penetration, coordinating multiple devices, such as OLTC, SVC, shunt capacitors, and energy storage systems, is considered useful for mitigating the voltage rise [4][5][6][7].
Although the primary operation of a PV system is to generate electricity, an inverter that converts DC power from PV modules to AC power can control the amount of active power and reactive power

Measurement of Voltage Reduction Due to Reverse Power Flow
Sample MV feeders with the PV system in the Kyushu area of Japan were extracted for measurement of voltage. The nominal voltage is 6.6 kV. As an example, a single line diagram for three of the sampled distribution feeders is presented in Figure 1.  Because MW-class PV systems that are larger than loads in the feeder are connected to all the distribution feeders in Figure 1, a large reverse power flow occurs during the day. The distribution feeder voltage near the substation and the MW-class PV system was measured using sensors. The sensors measure the voltage and current every second, and the average values for 30-min are recorded. The recorded data are applied to the voltage management system, which is composed of voltage control and distribution system planning. In our study, the measurement data have been analyzed so as to find the voltage reduction due to the reverse power flow. The active and reactive power can be calculated using the measurements. Measurements were conducted on 23 April 2017, which was a sunny day with a high level of solar radiation.  Because MW-class PV systems that are larger than loads in the feeder are connected to all the distribution feeders in Figure 1, a large reverse power flow occurs during the day. The distribution feeder voltage near the substation and the MW-class PV system was measured using sensors. The sensors measure the voltage and current every second, and the average values for 30-min are recorded. The recorded data are applied to the voltage management system, which is composed of voltage control and distribution system planning. In our study, the measurement data have been analyzed so as to find the voltage reduction due to the reverse power flow. The active and reactive power can be calculated Energies 2020, 13, 5430 4 of 17 using the measurements. Measurements were conducted on 23 April 2017, which was a sunny day with a high level of solar radiation. Figure 2 presents the measured voltage, active power, and reactive power in distribution feeder A shown in Figure 1a.  When the reverse active power flow increases during the daytime, the voltage near the MWclass PV system decreases compared to the voltage at the substation, that is, the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow occurs. In Figure 2c, the reactive power loss is presented by the difference between the measured reactive power near the substation and the PV system. It is clear that the  When the reverse active power flow increases during the daytime, the voltage near the MW-class PV system decreases compared to the voltage at the substation, that is, the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow occurs. In Figure 2c, the reactive power loss is presented by the difference between the measured reactive power near the substation and the PV system. It is clear that the reactive power loss increases with the magnitude of voltage reduction. The fact that the voltage reduces with an increase in the reactive power loss supports the theory previously indicated [16].     The voltage reduction due to the reverse power flow was also observed, simultaneously confirming the increase in the reactive power loss in the distribution feeder. These measurements indicate that the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow is a phenomenon that can occur in daily operation in a distribution feeder. This suggests that voltage control should be performed for voltage reduction and voltage rise due to reverse power flow.  The voltage reduction due to the reverse power flow was also observed, simultaneously confirming the increase in the reactive power loss in the distribution feeder. These measurements indicate that the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow is a phenomenon that can occur in daily operation in a distribution feeder. This suggests that voltage control should be performed for voltage reduction and voltage rise due to reverse power flow.

MV Distribution System Model
The effect of an increase in the PCS with a constant power factor control on voltage by power flow calculation was investigated using one of the actual distribution systems indicated in Section 2. Several new PCSs were assumed to be connected to the LV distribution system. Prior to the connection of the Energies 2020, 13, 5430 7 of 17 PCS, the voltage in the MV distribution feeder was reduced due to the reverse power flow, as shown in Figure 2a. Figure 5 presents a detailed one-line diagram of the three-phase 6.6-kV MV distribution system model that corresponds to the actual distribution feeder shown in Figure 1a. Node N1 expresses the secondary side of the transformer in the distribution substation. Large capacity PV systems are connected to nodes N23 and N35. Several nodes in the figure have the MV loads corresponding to the factory loads, while the other nodes have the LV distribution system of which the capacities are listed in Table 1. The line impedance shown in Figure 5 is estimated from the actual line material, thickness, length, and arrangement.

Low-Voltage Distribution System Model
The LV distribution system is assumed to be a single-phase three-wire system that is widely applied for customers in residential areas. Figure 6 presents a one-line diagram indicating a typical LV distribution system in Japan. A distribution transformer supplies power to eight customers via distribution lines. The impedance in the LV distribution system is shown in Table 2. The line impedance shown in Figure 6 is estimated from the actual line material, thickness, length, and arrangement. The customer has a load of 4 kW; therefore, the total load capacity in the LV distribution system is 32 kW. The amount of the LV distribution system connected to the MV distribution system shown in Figure 5 is arranged to obtain the load capacity of the LV distribution system presented in Table 1.      The total capacity of PCS in the LV distribution system depends on the number of customers with PV systems. The PCS consists of a DC/DC converter and inverter, which converts from DC power generated by the PV module to AC power. The capacity of PCS per customer is 4 kW. Because the amount of the LV distribution system connected to the MV distribution system depends on the load capacity shown in Table 1, the total capacity of the PCS installed in the distribution system can be changed by the number of customers with the PV system, as presented in Table 3.  Constant power factor control presented in Table 3 is applied to the PCS. The effect of the constant power factor control on the voltage will be described in Section 4. It is assumed that the bad influence of PCS, such as resonance due to power factor control on the power grid, would not occur in our study.

Load and PV Output Model
The time variation in the active power supplied to the load in the LV distribution system was modeled based on the measured value in the actual MV distribution line. Sensors were installed on the feeder that supplies power to the residential area, and the time variation in active power was measured. The time variation in the active power of the load model was obtained and expressed per unit, as shown in Figure 7, by selecting the total load capacity of the LV distribution system in the measured feeder as the base power. The reactive power of the load in the LV distribution system was excluded because it was sufficiently smaller than the active power in the LV distribution system in Japan. Therefore, the effect of the constant power factor control of PCS on the voltage in the distribution system would be apparent because the PCS is the only reactive power source in the LV distribution system.
Energies 2020, 13, x 10 of 18 distribution system would be apparent because the PCS is the only reactive power source in the LV distribution system. Additionally, a load model in the MV distribution system was obtained based on the measurements. The difference from the load in the LV distribution system was the time variation in the reactive power because most of the load in the MV distribution system, such as factories, introduces a capacitor for power factor correction. Therefore, the reactive power supplied to the load in the MV distribution system is not negligible.
The output model of the PV system in the distribution system shown in Figure 8 was created assuming clear weather, which implies significant solar radiation. Therefore, the reactive power injected from the PCS regulated by a constant power factor control will be larger than on cloudy or rainy days. This is a suitable condition for investigating the effect of the constant power factor control of the PCS on the voltage.   Additionally, a load model in the MV distribution system was obtained based on the measurements. The difference from the load in the LV distribution system was the time variation in the reactive power because most of the load in the MV distribution system, such as factories, introduces a capacitor for power factor correction. Therefore, the reactive power supplied to the load in the MV distribution system is not negligible.
The output model of the PV system in the distribution system shown in Figure 8 was created assuming clear weather, which implies significant solar radiation. Therefore, the reactive power injected from the PCS regulated by a constant power factor control will be larger than on cloudy or rainy days. This is a suitable condition for investigating the effect of the constant power factor control of the PCS on the voltage. of the PCS on the voltage.

Voltage without LV PCS
To clarify the effect of the amount and constant power factor control of PCS, the case where the PCS was not installed was calculated. Figure 9 presents the time variation in the voltage in the MV distribution system model shown in Figure 5. The results illustrate that the voltage at several nodes decreases with an increase in the output of the PV systems in the MV distribution system presented in Figure 5. The maximum voltage reaches 6.70 kV. It was found that the minimum voltage during the 24-h period drops to 6.51 kV when the amount of solar radiation is at its maximum. The difference between the maximum and minimum voltage is 0.19 kV.

Voltage without LV PCS
To clarify the effect of the amount and constant power factor control of PCS, the case where the PCS was not installed was calculated. Figure 9 presents the time variation in the voltage in the MV distribution system model shown in Figure 5. The results illustrate that the voltage at several nodes decreases with an increase in the output of the PV systems in the MV distribution system presented in Figure 5. The maximum voltage reaches 6.70 kV. It was found that the minimum voltage during the 24-h period drops to 6.51 kV when the amount of solar radiation is at its maximum. The difference between the maximum and minimum voltage is 0.19 kV.
Energies 2020, 13, x 11 of 18  Figure 10 presents the time variation in the voltage of the MV distribution feeder when the PCS is installed, for which the capacity is indicated in Table 3. As shown in Figure 10, the power factor of the PCS is set to 1.0. Case A1 is the smallest, and case D1 is the largest in the capacity of PCS. The maximum voltage during the 24-h period increases slightly with the capacity of PCS. This is explained by the power factor of the PV system. The average power factor of the PV system in the MV distribution feeder shown in Figure 5 is less than 1.0. When the capacity of PCS with a power factor of 1.0 increases, the power factor of the entire PV system approaches 1.0. For the same reason, the minimum voltage increases slightly. Figure 11 shows the voltage profile at the time when the PCS output is at its maximum. The    Figure 10 presents the time variation in the voltage of the MV distribution feeder when the PCS is installed, for which the capacity is indicated in Table 3. As shown in Figure 10, the power factor of the PCS is set to 1.0. Case A1 is the smallest, and case D1 is the largest in the capacity of PCS. The maximum voltage during the 24-h period increases slightly with the capacity of PCS. This is explained by the power factor of the PV system. The average power factor of the PV system in the MV distribution feeder shown in Figure 5 is less than 1.0. When the capacity of PCS with a power factor of 1.0 increases, the power factor of the entire PV system approaches 1.0. For the same reason, the minimum voltage increases slightly.

Effect of Constant Power Factor Control of PCS on Voltage at MV Distribution System
increases with the reactive power generated by PCS, and the voltage in the MV distribution feeder decreases. This becomes more apparent as the capacity of PCS increases. Regarding case D2, which is the largest in the capacity of PCS in Figure 11, the minimum voltage drops to 6.44 kV. The maximum voltage also decreases for the same reason. Figure 13 also presents the voltage profile when the power factor of PCS is 0.95. The voltage decreases with an increase in the capacity of PCS. The reactive power generated by the PCS has an influence on the voltage reduction. As presented in Figure 9, the voltage decreases by the PV system that is installed in the MV distribution system. Figure 13 indicates that the voltage is further reduced due to the constant power factor control of PCS. The voltage may decrease and deviate the lower limit of voltage in the MV distribution system by the constant power factor control.
(a) 6 Figure 11 shows the voltage profile at the time when the PCS output is at its maximum. The horizontal axis shows the node number that corresponds to the main line in the MV distribution system shown in Figure 5. The voltage increases with the capacity of PCS. When the power factor of PCS is equal to 1.0, the reactive power is not generated by the PCS. As a result, the voltage reduction due to the reactive power and line reactance does not affect the distribution line voltage.    Figure 11. Voltage profile in MV distribution feeder (power factor is set to 1.0).
Notably, the voltage reduction due to the reverse power flow worsens by setting the power factor of PCS to 0.95, as shown in Figure 12. The reactive power loss in the MV distribution feeder increases with the reactive power generated by PCS, and the voltage in the MV distribution feeder decreases. This becomes more apparent as the capacity of PCS increases. Regarding case D2, which is the largest in the capacity of PCS in Figure 11, the minimum voltage drops to 6.44 kV. The maximum voltage also decreases for the same reason.       Figure 13 also presents the voltage profile when the power factor of PCS is 0.95. The voltage decreases with an increase in the capacity of PCS. The reactive power generated by the PCS has an influence on the voltage reduction. As presented in Figure 9, the voltage decreases by the PV system that is installed in the MV distribution system. Figure 13 indicates that the voltage is further reduced due to the constant power factor control of PCS. The voltage may decrease and deviate the lower limit of voltage in the MV distribution system by the constant power factor control.  The maximum and minimum voltages in the MV distribution line as a function of PCS capacity are shown in Figure 14. When the power factor is set to 1.0, the maximum and minimum voltages increase with the capacity of PCS. However, setting the power factor to 0.95 results in the opposite. In particular, note that a decrease in the minimum voltage may affect the management of MV regulation. The difference between the maximum and minimum voltages does not significantly depend on the capacity of PCS.  The maximum and minimum voltages in the MV distribution line as a function of PCS capacity are shown in Figure 14. When the power factor is set to 1.0, the maximum and minimum voltages increase with the capacity of PCS. However, setting the power factor to 0.95 results in the opposite. In particular, note that a decrease in the minimum voltage may affect the management of MV regulation. The difference between the maximum and minimum voltages does not significantly depend on the capacity of PCS.

Comparison with Other MV Distribution System
The effects of constant power factor control of PCS on the voltage have been compared using other distribution system models. Figure 15 presents another detailed one-line diagram of the threephase 6.6 kV MV distribution system model that corresponds to the actual distribution feeder. Although large capacity PV systems are connected to nodes N24 and N25, the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow was not observed, and the voltage rise was observed. Figures 16 and 17 presents the voltage profile at the time when the PCS output is maximum. The horizontal axis shows the node number that corresponds to the main line in the MV distribution system shown in Figure 15. The black solid line shows the voltage profile without LV PCS, which presents the voltage rises by the reverse power flow. When the power factor is equal to 1.0, as shown in Figure 16, the voltage increases with the capacity of PCS. The application of the power factor of 0.95 on the PCS mitigates the voltage rise as shown in Figure 17.
These results are widely known as the effect of constant power factor control on the voltage rise, and are presented in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]16,17]. However, as described the previous section, if the voltage reduction is due to the large-scale reverse power flow, the power factor control has a bad influence on the voltage reduction, that is, the voltage may further decrease. In this case, the constant power factor control should not be applied to the LV PCS.

Comparison with Other MV Distribution System
The effects of constant power factor control of PCS on the voltage have been compared using other distribution system models. Figure 15 presents another detailed one-line diagram of the three-phase 6.6 kV MV distribution system model that corresponds to the actual distribution feeder. Although large capacity PV systems are connected to nodes N24 and N25, the voltage reduction due to reverse power flow was not observed, and the voltage rise was observed. Figures 16 and 17 presents the voltage profile at the time when the PCS output is maximum. The horizontal axis shows the node number that corresponds to the main line in the MV distribution system shown in Figure 15. The black solid line shows the voltage profile without LV PCS, which presents the voltage rises by the reverse power flow. When the power factor is equal to 1.0, as shown in Figure 16, the voltage increases with the capacity of PCS. The application of the power factor of 0.95 on the PCS mitigates the voltage rise as shown in Figure 17.

Effect of Constant Power Factor Control of PCS on Voltage in LV Distribution System
The voltage in all LV distribution systems connected to the MV distribution feeder was analyzed. The maximum and minimum voltages in all LV distribution systems during a 24-h period are summarized in Figure 18, which indicates that setting the power factor of PCS to 0.95 can mitigate the rise of the maximum voltage despite the capacity of PCS increasing. This can be explained by the fact that the constant power factor control of the PV system mitigates the overall voltage rise in the LV distribution system. Because the line resistance of the LV distribution system is sufficiently greater than its line reactance, the voltage reduction effect due to the reactive power loss of the PCS in the LV distribution system is smaller than the voltage increase effect due to the reverse active power flow. On

Effect of Constant Power Factor Control of PCS on Voltage in LV Distribution System
The voltage in all LV distribution systems connected to the MV distribution feeder was analyzed. The maximum and minimum voltages in all LV distribution systems during a 24-h period are summarized in Figure 18, which indicates that setting the power factor of PCS to 0.95 can mitigate the rise of the maximum voltage despite the capacity of PCS increasing. This can be explained by the fact that the constant power factor control of the PV system mitigates the overall voltage rise in the LV distribution system. Because the line resistance of the LV distribution system is sufficiently greater than its line reactance, the voltage reduction effect due to the reactive power loss of the PCS in the LV distribution system is smaller than the voltage increase effect due to the reverse active power flow. On

Effect of Constant Power Factor Control of PCS on Voltage in LV Distribution System
The voltage in all LV distribution systems connected to the MV distribution feeder was analyzed. The maximum and minimum voltages in all LV distribution systems during a 24-h period are summarized in Figure 18, which indicates that setting the power factor of PCS to 0.95 can mitigate the rise of the maximum voltage despite the capacity of PCS increasing. This can be explained by the fact that the constant power factor control of the PV system mitigates the overall voltage rise in the LV distribution system. Because the line resistance of the LV distribution system is sufficiently greater than its line reactance, the voltage reduction effect due to the reactive power loss of the PCS in the LV distribution system is smaller than the voltage increase effect due to the reverse active power flow. On  These results are widely known as the effect of constant power factor control on the voltage rise, and are presented in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]16,17]. However, as described the previous section, if the voltage reduction is due to the large-scale reverse power flow, the power factor control has a bad influence on the voltage reduction, that is, the voltage may further decrease. In this case, the constant power factor control should not be applied to the LV PCS.

Effect of Constant Power Factor Control of PCS on Voltage in LV Distribution System
The voltage in all LV distribution systems connected to the MV distribution feeder was analyzed. The maximum and minimum voltages in all LV distribution systems during a 24-h period are summarized in Figure 18, which indicates that setting the power factor of PCS to 0.95 can mitigate the

Conclusions
The measurement of voltage reduction in an actual distribution system due to a large reverse power flow in Japan was presented in this study. In addition, the effect of the constant power factor control of PCS in a LV distribution system on the voltage was investigated, assuming that the voltage of the MV distribution line reduces due to reverse power flow from the PV system in the MV distribution line. The primary results obtained are as follows: