A Process for Deﬁning Prototype Building Models: Courthouse Case Study for U.S. Commercial Energy

: Buildings currently consume 36% of the world’s energy and contribute nearly 40% of CO 2 emissions. Many countries desire to generate virtual models of their nation’s buildings in order to coordinate research activities and inform market opportunities for a more sustainable built environment. The United States Department of Energy uses a suite of Commercial Prototype Building Models, which currently includes 16 building types and covers 80% of US commercial ﬂoorspace. E ﬀ orts are underway to expand this suite by developing prototype models for additional building types. In this paper, we outline a systematic approach to deﬁning the building, collecting relevant information and creating a ﬂexible model while doing so in the pragmatic context of a courthouse building. Informed by building design guides, databases, documented projects and inputs from courthouse design experts, we deﬁne a small, 69,324 ft 2 (6440 m 2 ), four-courtroom, low-rise courthouse as the prototype to represent an average-size courthouse in the US. We present building characteristics relevant for energy model development and provide the rationale for their selection. These details combined with climate- and construction-vintage-speciﬁc requirements for the building envelope and systems from building standards will be used for developing the courthouse model for the Commercial Prototype Building Models suite. The comprehensive information presented will also guide model modiﬁcation to capture the dynamics of smaller or larger courthouses more accurately for building or system size-speciﬁc research.


Introduction
The United States (US) Department of Energy (DOE) has set aggressive goals for energy-efficiency in buildings-a 30% reduction in average energy use intensity of all US buildings by 2030 compared to a 2010 baseline [1]. To coordinate commercial building research across multiple disciplines, Commercial Reference Building Models were developed for the most common buildings [2,3] and later adapted as Commercial Prototype Building Models for use in code update development [4]. The current suite of Commercial Prototype Building Models covers 16 common building types-offices, hotels, schools, mercantile, food service, healthcare, apartments and warehouse-in 17 ASHRAE climate zones [5] and represents different construction vintages (pre-1980, 1980-2004) and building energy standards (ASHRAE Standards 90. 1-2004, 2007, 2013and International Energy Conservation Code 2006, 2009, 2012. The current combination results in an overall set of 2448 building models that covers 80% of the US commercial floorspace [4]. These models have been used to analyze the energy savings and cost impacts of energy-efficiency code updates [4,6]; develop prescriptive new construction and retrofit design guides [7,8]; create technical potential scales for building asset scores [9,10]; develop typical energy-conservation measures savings estimates for up-front incentives through utility programs [11]; create performance, cost, lifetime and time-to-market

Step 2: Prototype Building Planning and Design
A typical process of energy model development begins with collecting relevant physical and operational data. Most of these details are/can be well-defined for an actual building (proposed or existing). However, for a prototype building model to be a representative of a specific building type, it must align with the established organizational concepts, space-specific requirements, operational characteristics and prevalent design and construction practices. This is demonstrated in the context of courthouse building, as below.
Courthouses have unique building and occupancy characteristics, which differentiate them from office and government administration buildings [23]. These characteristics vary widely depending on the type and size of court. To understand the organizational concepts and space-specific requirements and to recognize the commonalities and variations, we reviewed the US Courts Design Guide (USCDG) for federal courts [24], state court design guide by the National Centers for State Courts [23] and several state-specific court design guides (California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25], Minimum Courtroom Standards in the State of Illinois [26], Kentucky Court Facilities Design Guide [27], The Michigan Courthouse [28]; Nebraska Courts Facility Planning [29], Guidelines for New York State Court Facilities [30], Utah Judicial Facility Design Standards [31] and Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines [32]). We examined the implementation of these concepts and the extent of variation using the following resources: • General Services Administration (GSA) Unit Cost Study [33,34], which provides area programs and floor plans of representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses and the GSA LEED Cost Study [35], which provides energy-modelling inputs of the mid-rise courthouse; • Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38], which collectively documents 236 federal and state courthouse projects designed in three decades-1980s, 1990s and 2000s;

Step 2: Prototype Building Planning and Design
A typical process of energy model development begins with collecting relevant physical and operational data. Most of these details are/can be well-defined for an actual building (proposed or existing). However, for a prototype building model to be a representative of a specific building type, it must align with the established organizational concepts, space-specific requirements, operational characteristics and prevalent design and construction practices. This is demonstrated in the context of courthouse building, as below.
Courthouses have unique building and occupancy characteristics, which differentiate them from office and government administration buildings [23]. These characteristics vary widely depending on the type and size of court. To understand the organizational concepts and space-specific requirements and to recognize the commonalities and variations, we reviewed the US Courts Design Guide (USCDG) for federal courts [24], state court design guide by the National Centers for State Courts [23] and several state-specific court design guides (California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25], Minimum Courtroom Standards in the State of Illinois [26], Kentucky Court Facilities Design Guide [27], The Michigan Courthouse [28]; Nebraska Courts Facility Planning [29], Guidelines for New York State Court Facilities [30], Utah Judicial Facility Design Standards [31] and Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines [32]). We examined the implementation of these concepts and the extent of variation using the following resources: General Services Administration (GSA) Unit Cost Study [33,34], which provides area programs and floor plans of representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses and the GSA LEED Cost Study [35], which provides energy-modelling inputs of the mid-rise courthouse; • Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38], which collectively documents 236 federal and state courthouse projects designed in three decades-1980s, 1990s and 2000s; • GSA Portfolio Data [39], which provides building area statistics for all 158 federal courthouses; and • Investment-grade audit documentation of 31 federal courthouses [40], which describes their overall building characteristics, construction, occupancy and systems.
To determine the prototype courthouse building characteristics (e.g., size of the courthouse, building geometry, construction type and system type), we reviewed the 2012 CBECS data [41] that includes a detail dataset for a statistical sample of 26 courthouses, which combined with sample weights, represents 6278 courthouses in the United States (2012 CBECS used a sample size of 6720 buildings under 53 building type subcategories to provide statistical information about energy consumption, expenditures and energy-related characteristics of 5.6 million commercial buildings in the US). In consultation with several courthouse facility planning and design experts, we condensed all these findings to define a prototype courthouse building and complete with area program and floor layout.

Step 3: Determining Construction Vintage and Standards-Specific Requirements
Based on the building characteristics determined in Step 2, detailed modelling specifications-including thermal properties of the building envelope and characteristics of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, water heating system, lighting and equipment-are developed according to the requirements for pre-1980 and 1980-2004 construction vintages and ASHRAE Standard 90. 1-2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016 for 17 ASHRAE climate zones [5] to develop 119 versions of the model (i.e., two construction vintages plus five standards multiplied by 17 climate zones). The modelling specifications are submitted for review by building energy codes and standards experts (currently, the ASHRAE Advanced Energy Standards Working Group).

Step 4: Prototype Model Development and Verification
The energy models are developed for the OpenStudio Standards library [42], which allows users to readily create prototype courthouse models for desired ASHRAE climate zones, construction vintages and ASHRAE standards in OpenStudio format and EnergyPlus [4] and conduct a range of analysis as discussed in Section 1 [13]. For model verification, simulated energy consumption is compared with available measured energy use and utility data from existing building datasets.

Prototype-Specific Building Characterization
The following Sections demonstrate Steps 1 and 2 of the methodology for prototype building characterization (i.e., defining a building narrative and building planning and design) through the context of courthouse, beginning with a comparison of floor space and energy use of the building population it would represent among other US commercial buildings.

Common Statistics for Prototype Comparison
According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], courthouses occupy a total of 436 million ft 2 (40.5 million m 2 ) of floorspace, which represents 0.5% of US commercial floorspace-the same order as fast-food (0.35%), grocery store or food market (0.88%) and restaurant or cafeteria (1.2%) buildings included in the Commercial Prototype Building Model suite (Figure 2a). They consume a total of 41 trillion Btu of fuel, which represents 0.6% of total fuel consumption in US commercial buildings (Figure 2b). Further, the average floor area for courthouses is 69,400 ft 2 (6447 m 2 )-significantly larger than the 15,800 ft 2 (1468 m 2 ) average for offices and the 15,700 ft 2 (1459 m 2 ) average for all commercial buildings combined; Energies 2019, 12, 4020 5 of 27 while, the average fuel consumption intensity is 94.7 kBtu/ft 2 (300 kW/m 2 )-comparable to 77.8 kBtu/ft 2 (245 kW/m 2 ) for offices and 80 kBtu/ft 2 (252 kW/m 2 ) for all commercial buildings combined ( Figure 2c). Further, as shown in Figure 2d, the range of variation of fuel consumption intensity for courthouses in 2012 CBECS data is much narrow compared to most other building types. The right skewed distribution (i.e., the median smaller than the mean) indicates higher number of building in the lower than average fuel consumption intensity regime. The right skewed distribution (i.e., the median smaller than the mean) indicates higher number of building in the lower than average fuel consumption intensity regime.

Operational Context
The US court system consists of a federal court system and the state and territorial court systems of the individual US states and territories. Each court system is generally divided into three tiers-(i) trial or district court, the lowest tier at which a case starts; (ii) appellate court, where most appeals are first heard; and (iii) supreme court, which hears further appeals and has final authority in the

Operational Context
The US court system consists of a federal court system and the state and territorial court systems of the individual US states and territories. Each court system is generally divided into three tiers-(i) trial or district court, the lowest tier at which a case starts; (ii) appellate court, where most appeals are first heard; and (iii) supreme court, which hears further appeals and has final authority in the cases heard. Some cases initiated in a state court system may ultimately end up in the federal court system ( Figure 3) [24].
Energies 2019, 12, x 6 of 27 cases heard. Some cases initiated in a state court system may ultimately end up in the federal court system ( Figure 3) [24]. Federal and state courts are different in terms of the types of cases heard. Federal courts handle cases involving federal laws, foreign diplomats and disputes between two or more states or its citizens [24]. State courts, generally, have two levels of trial courts-(i) special jurisdiction courts with jurisdiction limited to specific types of cases (such as traffic cases, minor civil and criminal disputes, juvenile cases) and (ii) general jurisdiction courts with jurisdiction over all other cases, including serious criminal and civil cases [22,43].
Federal courts in the United States include 94 trial courts, 13 appellate courts and a supreme court [24]. State courts include 15,679 trial courts, 95 appellate courts and 57 supreme courts [44]. Federal courts, in most cases, are in multi-tenant buildings; other tenants may include the US Postal Service, the US Marshals Service, correctional facilities and juvenile facilities. State courts, in some cases, may be in an administrative building of the local government (such as a municipal building or a state or county office building).
The 2012 CBECS data represents 6278 courthouses, which is approximately 40% of the number of courthouses listed in References [23] and [43]. It should be noted that CBECS data includes only commercial buildings greater than 1000 ft 2 . Further, the building type/subtype category in the CBECS data tables presents a classification of the commercial activity that occupies the most floor area in the building. Therefore, it is likely that many small courthouses or courthouses in multi-tenant buildings are not counted in CBECS data.
These distinctions between different court types provided a context when reviewing courthouse design guides, databases and documented projects, and is discussed further in the following sections.

Grossing and Efficiency Factors
Courthouses have relatively less space efficiency compared to office buildings due to special volume, circulation and security needs. According to Reference [23], courthouses are typically designed to achieve a net square footage (NSF) of 57-65% and a departmental gross square footage (DGSF), or usable square feet (USF), of 75-85% of building gross square footage (BGSF or GSF), compared to 60-70% NSF in office buildings. To further clarify these terms, NSF includes space required for a particular function, exclusive of interior walls or circulation space around the Federal and state courts are different in terms of the types of cases heard. Federal courts handle cases involving federal laws, foreign diplomats and disputes between two or more states or its citizens [24]. State courts, generally, have two levels of trial courts-(i) special jurisdiction courts with jurisdiction limited to specific types of cases (such as traffic cases, minor civil and criminal disputes, juvenile cases) and (ii) general jurisdiction courts with jurisdiction over all other cases, including serious criminal and civil cases [22,43].
Federal courts in the United States include 94 trial courts, 13 appellate courts and a supreme court [24]. State courts include 15,679 trial courts, 95 appellate courts and 57 supreme courts [44]. Federal courts, in most cases, are in multi-tenant buildings; other tenants may include the US Postal Service, the US Marshals Service, correctional facilities and juvenile facilities. State courts, in some cases, may be in an administrative building of the local government (such as a municipal building or a state or county office building).
The 2012 CBECS data represents 6278 courthouses, which is approximately 40% of the number of courthouses listed in References [23] and [43]. It should be noted that CBECS data includes only commercial buildings greater than 1000 ft 2 . Further, the building type/subtype category in the CBECS data tables presents a classification of the commercial activity that occupies the most floor area in the building. Therefore, it is likely that many small courthouses or courthouses in multi-tenant buildings are not counted in CBECS data.
These distinctions between different court types provided a context when reviewing courthouse design guides, databases and documented projects, and is discussed further in the following sections.

Grossing and Efficiency Factors
Courthouses have relatively less space efficiency compared to office buildings due to special volume, circulation and security needs. According to Reference [23], courthouses are typically designed to achieve a net square footage (NSF) of 57-65% and a departmental gross square footage (DGSF), or usable square feet (USF), of 75-85% of building gross square footage (BGSF or GSF), compared to 60-70% NSF in office buildings. To further clarify these terms, NSF includes space required for a particular function, exclusive of interior walls or circulation space around the functional area. DGSF equals NSF plus a circulation factor to account for internal walls and partitions, internal corridors and circulation among functional components. BGSF equals DGSF plus corridors, stairs, elevators and lobbies linking various departments, vertical shafts, common areas, public toilet facilities and exterior walls. The state-specific court design guides 2 show slight variations in these factors. In federal courts, the USF typically accounts for 67% of GSF of court facilities indicating more circulation and public areas [24].
We examined the efficiency factor in representative low-rise (4-story, 5 courtrooms), mid-rise (6-story, 10 courtrooms) and high-rise (22-story, 20 courtrooms) federal courthouses used for the GSA Unit Cost Study [34]. In all three examples, the courthouse includes court-related spaces, offices for other agencies and a secured covered parking. Table 1 outlines the building description and key area programming metrics for these courthouses and shows a 'USF of courts and other agencies' as 63-66% of BGSF, which aligns with USCDG [24]. Table 1. Example area programming metrics for low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses [34].

Categories
Low 1 Federal courthouse may include bankruptcy courtrooms, which are non-jury courtrooms and do not require jury deliberation rooms. Bankruptcy cases can only be filed in a federal court, not in a state court. 2 The high-rise courthouse presented here included 6 typical floors with courtrooms and judge's chambers on the same floor, 4 typical floors dedicated to courtrooms and 2 typical floors dedicated to judge's chambers. The exact number of judge's chambers could not be estimated from the aggregated area for judicial chambers provided in Reference [34].
We also examined the efficiency factor in courthouses documented in the Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38]. These courthouses range from 3000 to 1.3 million BGSF (279-120,774 m 2 ), with up to 74 courtrooms. Figure 4 shows the percent frequency of building efficiency ratio (i.e., ratio of NSF to BGSF) in federal and state courthouses and indicates 71-75% as the most common range in both federal and state courthouses. BGSF in federal courts, in most cases, includes area of court-related spaces as well as other agencies; since these projects were competitively selected and not sampled, the derived statistics may not be representative of federal and state courthouse populations.

Scale and Size of Building
The number of courtrooms is the main determinant of the size of a courthouse [32]. USCDG [32] categorizes a courthouse as small for up to 5 courtrooms, medium for 6-12 courtrooms and large for more than 12 courtrooms. Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines [32] reports a national average BGSF of 12,000-17,000 (1115-1579 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher limits for trial courthouses. California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25] recommends BGSF of 9000-14,000 (836-1300 m 2 ) per courtroom.
We examine the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in the representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses used for GSA Unit Cost Study [34]. Table 1 shows a court USF of 12,557-14,760 (1167-1371 m 2 ) per courtroom or BGSF of 21,835-27,320 (2029-2538 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher range for smaller, low-rise federal courthouse.
We also examined the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in federal and state courthouses documented in the Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38]. Figure 5a shows that the documented projects represented federal and state courthouses of all sizes. The predominant number of courtrooms in small, medium and large courthouses were 4-5 courtrooms, 7 courtrooms and 13-15 courtrooms, respectively, in federal courthouses and 4 courtrooms, 10 courtrooms and 16-25 courtrooms, respectively, in state courthouses. Figure 5b shows that the predominant ratio of gross square feet to number of courtrooms is 20,000-30,000 ft 2 (1858-2787 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 28,387 ft 2 (2637 m 2 ) per courtroom in federal courthouses and 10,000-15,000 ft 2 (929-1394 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 16,886.5 ft 2 (1569 m 2 ) per courtroom in state courthouses, which are close to the higher limits of the ranges recommended by courthouse design guides and standards discussed above.

Scale and Size of Building
The number of courtrooms is the main determinant of the size of a courthouse [32]. USCDG [32] categorizes a courthouse as small for up to 5 courtrooms, medium for 6-12 courtrooms and large for more than 12 courtrooms. Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines [32] reports a national average BGSF of 12,000-17,000 (1115-1579 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher limits for trial courthouses. California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25] recommends BGSF of 9000-14,000 (836-1300 m 2 ) per courtroom.
We examine the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in the representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses used for GSA Unit Cost Study [34]. Table 1 shows a court USF of 12,557-14,760 (1167-1371 m 2 ) per courtroom or BGSF of 21,835-27,320 (2029-2538 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher range for smaller, low-rise federal courthouse.
We also examined the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in federal and state courthouses documented in the Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38]. Figure 5a shows that the documented projects represented federal and state courthouses of all sizes. The predominant number of courtrooms in small, medium and large courthouses were 4-5 courtrooms, 7 courtrooms and 13-15 courtrooms, respectively, in federal courthouses and 4 courtrooms, 10 courtrooms and 16-25 courtrooms, respectively, in state courthouses.

Scale and Size of Building
The number of courtrooms is the main determinant of the size of a courthouse [32]. USCDG [32] categorizes a courthouse as small for up to 5 courtrooms, medium for 6-12 courtrooms and large for more than 12 courtrooms. Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines [32] reports a national average BGSF of 12,000-17,000 (1115-1579 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher limits for trial courthouses. California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25] recommends BGSF of 9000-14,000 (836-1300 m 2 ) per courtroom.
We examine the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in the representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses used for GSA Unit Cost Study [34]. Table 1 shows a court USF of 12,557-14,760 (1167-1371 m 2 ) per courtroom or BGSF of 21,835-27,320 (2029-2538 m 2 ) per courtroom-higher range for smaller, low-rise federal courthouse.
We also examined the number of courtrooms and how it corresponds to the building area in federal and state courthouses documented in the Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38]. Figure 5a shows that the documented projects represented federal and state courthouses of all sizes. The predominant number of courtrooms in small, medium and large courthouses were 4-5 courtrooms, 7 courtrooms and 13-15 courtrooms, respectively, in federal courthouses and 4 courtrooms, 10 courtrooms and 16-25 courtrooms, respectively, in state courthouses. Figure 5b shows that the predominant ratio of gross square feet to number of courtrooms is 20,000-30,000 ft 2 (1858-2787 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 28,387 ft 2 (2637 m 2 ) per courtroom in federal courthouses and 10,000-15,000 ft 2 (929-1394 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 16,886.5 ft 2 (1569 m 2 ) per courtroom in state courthouses, which are close to the higher limits of the ranges recommended by courthouse design guides and standards discussed above.

Characteristic Spaces
Courthouses are used by a variety of people including judges, attorneys, jury, witnesses, victims, in-custody defendants, clerks, other employees, outside social agencies, the press and the general public. The characteristic spaces in a courthouse include courtrooms, judges' suites, offices, lobby, waiting areas and secured parking for judges, court officers and others with high security clearance. Trial courts may involve a jury requiring larger courtrooms and additional spaces for jury operation (i.e., a jury assembly area and jury deliberation rooms), attorney-client/witness waiting rooms and holding areas and secured circulation for in-custody defendants. The appellate courts do not take trial cases and therefore do not require these spaces. Many courthouses include a law library. The courthouse building management and support areas typically include a mail room, maintenance, storage and supply and mechanical/electrical room.
The number of courtrooms is the major factor determining the number and size of the judicial, clerk, public, technical and other spaces throughout the building [32]. National Centers for State Courts [23] provides a few typical courthouse design parameters summarized as ratios of major room types.
Ratio of courtrooms to judges' chambers: Typically, in a courthouse with 10 or fewer courtrooms, each judge is assigned a courtroom. In larger courthouses, courtrooms can be shared, requiring three courtrooms for every four judges. In less populated areas, one courtroom may be shared by several divisions of the same court or by different courts. For courtroom sharing to work, all courtrooms should be identical in their capabilities, such as for holding a criminal jury trial. It is to be noted that not every hearing or proceeding has to take place in a courtroom; many can be held in chambers or in a smaller hearing or conference room.
Ratio of jury deliberation rooms to courtrooms: Typically, in a courthouse with up to four or five courtrooms, one jury deliberation room per courtroom in provided. In larger courthouses, a ratio of six or seven deliberation rooms per ten jury courtrooms is used, as long as deliberation rooms are accessible to all courtrooms. Criminal courts may require a higher ratio of deliberation rooms per courtroom than civil, municipal and traffic courts.
Ratio of jury to non-jury courtrooms: The ratio of jury to non-jury courtrooms depends upon several factors. The most flexible situation is for each courtroom to have a jury box or space for a jury box. As a general rule, unless jury trials are extremely rare, the court should plan to make most courtrooms jury-capable. Table 1 shows that for the representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses in GSA Unit Cost Study [34], the number of jury deliberation rooms correspond to the number of trial courtrooms and the number of judges' chambers correspond to the total number of courtrooms (including trial and bankruptcy courtrooms) and thus, are consistent with these design parameters.  Figure 5b shows that the predominant ratio of gross square feet to number of courtrooms is 20,000-30,000 ft 2 (1858-2787 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 28,387 ft 2 (2637 m 2 ) per courtroom in federal courthouses and 10,000-15,000 ft 2 (929-1394 m 2 ) per courtroom with an average of 16,886.5 ft 2 (1569 m 2 ) per courtroom in state courthouses, which are close to the higher limits of the ranges recommended by courthouse design guides and standards discussed above.

Characteristic Spaces
Courthouses are used by a variety of people including judges, attorneys, jury, witnesses, victims, in-custody defendants, clerks, other employees, outside social agencies, the press and the general public. The characteristic spaces in a courthouse include courtrooms, judges' suites, offices, lobby, waiting areas and secured parking for judges, court officers and others with high security clearance. Trial courts may involve a jury requiring larger courtrooms and additional spaces for jury operation (i.e., a jury assembly area and jury deliberation rooms), attorney-client/witness waiting rooms and holding areas and secured circulation for in-custody defendants. The appellate courts do not take trial cases and therefore do not require these spaces. Many courthouses include a law library. The courthouse building management and support areas typically include a mail room, maintenance, storage and supply and mechanical/electrical room.
The number of courtrooms is the major factor determining the number and size of the judicial, clerk, public, technical and other spaces throughout the building [32]. National Centers for State Courts [23] provides a few typical courthouse design parameters summarized as ratios of major room types.
Ratio of courtrooms to judges' chambers: Typically, in a courthouse with 10 or fewer courtrooms, each judge is assigned a courtroom. In larger courthouses, courtrooms can be shared, requiring three courtrooms for every four judges. In less populated areas, one courtroom may be shared by several divisions of the same court or by different courts. For courtroom sharing to work, all courtrooms should be identical in their capabilities, such as for holding a criminal jury trial. It is to be noted that not every hearing or proceeding has to take place in a courtroom; many can be held in chambers or in a smaller hearing or conference room.
Ratio of jury deliberation rooms to courtrooms: Typically, in a courthouse with up to four or five courtrooms, one jury deliberation room per courtroom in provided. In larger courthouses, a ratio of six or seven deliberation rooms per ten jury courtrooms is used, as long as deliberation rooms are accessible to all courtrooms. Criminal courts may require a higher ratio of deliberation rooms per courtroom than civil, municipal and traffic courts.
Ratio of jury to non-jury courtrooms: The ratio of jury to non-jury courtrooms depends upon several factors. The most flexible situation is for each courtroom to have a jury box or space for a jury box. As a general rule, unless jury trials are extremely rare, the court should plan to make most courtrooms jury-capable. Table 1 shows that for the representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses in GSA Unit Cost Study [34], the number of jury deliberation rooms correspond to the number of trial courtrooms and the number of judges' chambers correspond to the total number of courtrooms (including trial and bankruptcy courtrooms) and thus, are consistent with these design parameters.

Circulation
The courthouse circulation related guidance is similar for federal and state courts [23,24]. The courthouse circulation system consists of three separate and distinct paths of movement for the public, court professionals and in-custody defendants ( Figure 6). Public circulation provides access from main building entrances to the various functional areas of the building. Private circulation provides controlled access to particular courthouse users, specifically, movement of judges and trial-related court personnel between chambers and courtrooms and movement of sequestered jurors between courtrooms and jury deliberation rooms. Secure circulation is physically separate from all nonsecure spaces and circulation systems in the courthouse and provides for the movement of in-custody defendants-access to the building through a secure vehicular or pedestrian sally port, a secure central holding and staging area, small holding units directly adjacent to the courtrooms and secure elevators for circulation from the central holding area to the court-floor holding units. The only quasi-public interface that might occur would involve meetings with defense attorneys in holding areas. In addition, there are interfaces between public and private circulation through screening or security and in large courthouses, secondary circulation for service staff to provide movement in building support areas with controlled access from public circulation. The courthouse circulation related guidance is similar for federal and state courts [23,24]. The courthouse circulation system consists of three separate and distinct paths of movement for the public, court professionals and in-custody defendants ( Figure 6). Public circulation provides access from main building entrances to the various functional areas of the building. Private circulation provides controlled access to particular courthouse users, specifically, movement of judges and trialrelated court personnel between chambers and courtrooms and movement of sequestered jurors between courtrooms and jury deliberation rooms. Secure circulation is physically separate from all nonsecure spaces and circulation systems in the courthouse and provides for the movement of incustody defendants-access to the building through a secure vehicular or pedestrian sally port, a secure central holding and staging area, small holding units directly adjacent to the courtrooms and secure elevators for circulation from the central holding area to the court-floor holding units. The only quasi-public interface that might occur would involve meetings with defense attorneys in holding areas. In addition, there are interfaces between public and private circulation through screening or security and in large courthouses, secondary circulation for service staff to provide movement in building support areas with controlled access from public circulation.

Adjacency, Stacking and Blocking
The courthouse zoning related guidance is similar for federal and state courts [23,24]. Due to the adjacency requirements of different spaces, courthouses have a characteristic stacking scheme of different floors and a characteristic blocking scheme on the court floor, as shown in Figure 7.
Stacking scheme: The high-volume functions of the courthouse (such as central office areas, including clerks and jury assembly) and functions that require after-hours access are located on the lower floors and near the lobby. Courtrooms are clustered on the higher floor(s), with shared support Figure 6. Three-part circulation system in a courthouse shown in section (a) and court-floor plan (b) [25]. The courthouse zoning related guidance is similar for federal and state courts [23,24]. Due to the adjacency requirements of different spaces, courthouses have a characteristic stacking scheme of different floors and a characteristic blocking scheme on the court floor, as shown in Figure 7. The Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38] shows the possible variations in the floor layout, while adhering to these organizational concepts, such as (a) single-loaded versus doubleloaded public corridor/waiting areas on the court floor, (b) judges' suites on the courtroom floors versus all on a dedicated floor in large courthouses, (c) courtroom sharing in larger courthouses versus one courtroom per judge and (d) location of courtrooms in the center versus on the perimeter.
In Figure 8, the court floor plan of the three representative courthouses in GSA [34] shows double-loaded corridor on the court floor for the low-rise and single-loaded for mid-rise and highrise courthouses; judges' suites on the courtroom floors for the low-rise and mid-rise courthouses and Stacking scheme: The high-volume functions of the courthouse (such as central office areas, including clerks and jury assembly) and functions that require after-hours access are located on the lower floors and near the lobby. Courtrooms are clustered on the higher floor(s), with shared support spaces. In trial courthouses, a central detention area for in-custody defendants is located on the lower floor and accessed through a sally port.
Blocking scheme on the courtroom floor: Courtrooms are clustered in groups of two, four, six or eight, with shared support spaces. Court-related functions such as witness rooms, audio-visual room, evidence room and detention area are placed near courtrooms. Jury deliberation rooms are located near trial courtrooms and accessed from private circulation. Judges' suites including judges' chambers and offices of judiciary staff are located on the courtroom floor behind the courts or clustered on dedicated floor(s).
The Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38] shows the possible variations in the floor layout, while adhering to these organizational concepts, such as (a) single-loaded versus double-loaded public corridor/waiting areas on the court floor, (b) judges' suites on the courtroom floors versus all on a dedicated floor in large courthouses, (c) courtroom sharing in larger courthouses versus one courtroom per judge and (d) location of courtrooms in the center versus on the perimeter.
In Figure 8, the court floor plan of the three representative courthouses in GSA [34] shows double-loaded corridor on the court floor for the low-rise and single-loaded for mid-rise and high-rise courthouses; judges' suites on the courtroom floors for the low-rise and mid-rise courthouses and non-jury courtroom floors in the high-rise courthouse; and off-the-perimeter location of courtrooms in all courthouses.

Space area Distribution
To examine the space area distribution in courthouses, we reviewed the area program of representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses in GSA [34]. Figure 9 compares the space area distribution in these courthouses. It shows courtrooms occupying 14-19% of court USF; judges' chambers, 13-18%; detention areas, 5-6%; and offices, 63-67% (including 13-23% for clerk, 13- These variations demonstrate how multiple blocks of courtroom functional sets, comprised of two courtrooms and associated spaces, can be arranged in linear or concentric pattern of recursion [45] and stacked on different floors (and supplemented by proportional change in the area of support level(s) which houses clerk's office, jury assembly, security, etc.) to develop smaller or larger courthouses.

Space area Distribution
To examine the space area distribution in courthouses, we reviewed the area program of representative low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise federal courthouses in GSA [34]. Figure 9 compares the space area distribution in these courthouses. It shows courtrooms occupying 14-19% of court USF; judges' chambers, 13-18%; detention areas, 5-6%; and offices, 63-67% (including 13-23% for clerk, 13-18% for court support, 2% for jury assembly, up to 5% for library and 22-29% for other offices).

Space Standards and Heights
Courthouse design guides provide space planning standards as the min-max range for many characteristic spaces (such as courtroom, court support areas, judges' chambers, jury deliberation room, detention cell, security control room), as well as detailed guidance on determining the area requirements for occupancy-dependent spaces (such as courtroom waiting, jury assembly, clerk). In general, the courtrooms, public spaces and judges' chambers are larger in federal courthouses. However, large variations in the area requirements for these spaces are found in the state-specific design guides 2 . Further, the area for the courtroom depends on the type of courtroom (such as jury trial courtroom, non-jury trial courtroom, appellate courtroom) as well as the size of the jury and number of spectators [23,24].
Courthouses have explicit requirements for high ceiling heights in courtrooms depending on the type and area of courtroom [23,24]. For efficient planning, dedicating the entire floor(s) for courtrooms is recommended [23]. The floor-to-floor height should be determined to include the height of the accessible floor system (or ceiling plenum) [46].

Construction
GSA [46] specifies baseline construction standards for federal courthouses, which includes a precast concrete exterior envelope with stone, brick or other durable finishing materials; ballisticresistance glazing at various levels of the facility; interior wall partitions composed of gypsum board on metal studs; and concrete masonry for detention spaces, elevators and service shafts. The GSA Unit Cost Study [33] and GSA LEED Cost Study [35] used slight variants of the GSA baseline construction.

Space Standards and Heights
Courthouse design guides provide space planning standards as the min-max range for many characteristic spaces (such as courtroom, court support areas, judges' chambers, jury deliberation room, detention cell, security control room), as well as detailed guidance on determining the area requirements for occupancy-dependent spaces (such as courtroom waiting, jury assembly, clerk). In general, the courtrooms, public spaces and judges' chambers are larger in federal courthouses. However, large variations in the area requirements for these spaces are found in the state-specific design guides 2 . Further, the area for the courtroom depends on the type of courtroom (such as jury trial courtroom, non-jury trial courtroom, appellate courtroom) as well as the size of the jury and number of spectators [23,24].
Courthouses have explicit requirements for high ceiling heights in courtrooms depending on the type and area of courtroom [23,24]. For efficient planning, dedicating the entire floor(s) for courtrooms is recommended [23]. The floor-to-floor height should be determined to include the height of the accessible floor system (or ceiling plenum) [46].

Construction
GSA [46] specifies baseline construction standards for federal courthouses, which includes a precast concrete exterior envelope with stone, brick or other durable finishing materials; ballistic-resistance glazing at various levels of the facility; interior wall partitions composed of gypsum board on metal studs; and concrete masonry for detention spaces, elevators and service shafts. The GSA Unit Cost Study [33] and GSA LEED Cost Study [35] used slight variants of the GSA baseline construction. Additional construction details in these studies include-poured-in-place concrete for basement walls; composite concrete on steel deck for floor and roof construction; flat roof with built-up roofing and closed cell polystyrene rigid insulation; and aluminum frame punched window system.
On the other hand, the 2012 CBECS data [41] shows 'brick, stone or stucco' on stud-walls (representing 84% of courthouses and 43% of courthouse floorspace) as the predominant wall construction and 'plastic, rubber or synthetic sheeting' (representing 43% of courthouses) and 'built-up roofing' (representing 45% of courthouse floorspace) as the common roof construction (Figure 10).

Schedule of Building Use
According to USCDG [24], courtrooms may be used during extended hours. Judges' chambers are routinely in use during evenings and weekends. Clerks' offices operate on flextime. Probation offices can have early morning and late evening hours. Other areas that routinely require off-hours operation are the trial jury suite and grand jury suite. There is often a need for after-hours access to some parts of the building [32].
To examine the implementation of this guidance, we reviewed the space-specific schedules modelled for the GSA LEED Cost Study [35] and noted space occupancy from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. in general office areas and judge's chambers, 8 a.m. to Noon in jury assembly area, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. in courtrooms, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in jury deliberation rooms and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in holding cells. We also noted the diversity of use among courtrooms throughout the year modelled through multiple daily, weekly and annual schedules.

Schedule of Building Use
According to USCDG [24], courtrooms may be used during extended hours. Judges' chambers are routinely in use during evenings and weekends. Clerks' offices operate on flextime. Probation offices can have early morning and late evening hours. Other areas that routinely require off-hours operation are the trial jury suite and grand jury suite. There is often a need for after-hours access to some parts of the building [32].
To examine the implementation of this guidance, we reviewed the space-specific schedules modelled for the GSA LEED Cost Study [35] and noted space occupancy from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. in general office areas and judge's chambers, 8 a.m. to Noon in jury assembly area, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. in courtrooms, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in jury deliberation rooms and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in holding cells. We also noted the diversity of use among courtrooms throughout the year modelled through multiple daily, weekly and annual schedules.
We also examined the hours of operation for 31 federal courthouses [40] (Figure 11a) and found that most federal courthouse operate from 7 a.m. through 6 p.m., with 11 hours per day as the average duration of operation. In the 26 sample courthouses in the 2012 CBECS data [41] (Figure 11b

Control of HVAC System
Courthouse design guides provide guidelines for the control of HVAC systems in different spaces. California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25] specifies that each courtroom, judge's suite, jury deliberation room, corner office, entrance lobby, staff lounge, conference room, mailroom and equipment room should be an independent zone. USCDG [24] specifies that each 'court set,' which comprises of a courtroom and supporting spaces, a judge's suite (when located adjacent to a courtroom) and a jury deliberation room, must be served from the same HVAC system (i.e., separate zones having related thermostats) and the design must account for variation in occupancy load.
Further, inside the courtroom, three HVAC zones must be provided for air distribution-the judge and attorney area, the jury area and the spectator area [24]. Architectural features in courtrooms are generally above the standard conventional design, often with custom millwork including wood and ornate ceilings, which require both temperature and humidity control [47].
Court functions also require flexibility in the time of operation and control of HVAC systems. Therefore, the HVAC system must be designed to operate after standard building operation hours.

Control of HVAC System
Courthouse design guides provide guidelines for the control of HVAC systems in different spaces. California Trial Court Facilities Standards [25] specifies that each courtroom, judge's suite, jury deliberation room, corner office, entrance lobby, staff lounge, conference room, mailroom and equipment room should be an independent zone. USCDG [24] specifies that each 'court set,' which comprises of a courtroom and supporting spaces, a judge's suite (when located adjacent to a courtroom) and a jury deliberation room, must be served from the same HVAC system (i.e., separate zones having related thermostats) and the design must account for variation in occupancy load.
Further, inside the courtroom, three HVAC zones must be provided for air distribution-the judge and attorney area, the jury area and the spectator area [24]. Architectural features in courtrooms are generally above the standard conventional design, often with custom millwork including wood and ornate ceilings, which require both temperature and humidity control [47].
Court functions also require flexibility in the time of operation and control of HVAC systems. Therefore, the HVAC system must be designed to operate after standard building operation hours.

Building Area
In the 2012 CBECS data [41], the area of courthouses is between 1300 and 800,000 ft 2 (121-74,322 m 2 ) with an average of 69,400 ft 2 (6447 m 2 ). Figure 12a plots this data as percent buildings and percent floorspace by square footage categories. It shows that most courthouses (30%) are small buildings (i.e., 1000-5000 ft 2 or 93-465 m 2 ) but they comprise less than 1% of the total floorspace occupied by courthouses. In the GSA Portfolio Data [39], the court USF in federal courthouses is between 4200 and 788,000 (390-73,208 m 2 ) with an average of 109,000 (10,126 m 2 ) and a median of 55,000 (5110 m 2 ). This court USF excludes non-court functions, such as other federal offices, covered parking, common spaces (e.g., lobbies, corridors, service areas, toilets, etc.) and vertical penetrations. Figure 12b plots this data as percent buildings and percent floorspace by court USF categories. It aligns with Figure 12a except that federal courthouses are rarely small buildings. . This court USF excludes non-court functions, such as other federal offices, covered parking, common spaces (e.g., lobbies, corridors, service areas, toilets, etc.) and vertical penetrations. Figure 12b plots this data as percent buildings and percent floorspace by court USF categories. It aligns with Figure  12a except that federal courthouses are rarely small buildings.

Building Shape
According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], wide rectangle is the predominant building shape for courthouses. They represent 66% of courthouses and 59% of total courthouse floorspace in the United States (Figure 13a). To determine the building aspect ratio, we used the 1992 CBECS data [48], since the newer CBECS datasets no longer include this data. In the 1992 CBECS dataset [48], buildings are categorized only by the principal building activity (e.g., Public Order and Safety) and not by subcategory (e.g., courthouse). For the 'public order and safety' building category, the average aspect ratio of rectangular buildings, percent buildings and percent floorspace are plotted in Figure 13b by building square footage categories. It shows that for the categories between 5000 and 1 million ft 2 (465-93,000 m 2 ), which comprise 65% of buildings and 70% of courthouse floorspace, the average aspect ratio ranges between 2:1-2.4:1. Buildings less than 5000 ft 2 (465 m 2 ) and more than 1 million ft 2

Building Shape
According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], wide rectangle is the predominant building shape for courthouses. They represent 66% of courthouses and 59% of total courthouse floorspace in the United States (Figure 13a). To determine the building aspect ratio, we used the 1992 CBECS data [48], since the newer CBECS datasets no longer include this data. In the 1992 CBECS dataset [48], buildings are categorized only by the principal building activity (e.g., Public Order and Safety) and not by subcategory (e.g., courthouse). For the 'public order and safety' building category, the average aspect ratio of rectangular buildings, percent buildings and percent floorspace are plotted in Figure 13b by building square footage categories. It shows that for the categories between 5000 and 1 million ft 2 (465-93,000 m 2 ), which comprise 65% of buildings and 70% of courthouse floorspace, the average aspect ratio ranges between 2:1-2.4:1. Buildings less than 5000 ft 2 (465 m 2 ) and more than 1 million ft 2 (93,000 m 2 ) have a smaller aspect ratio.

Number of Floors
USCDG [24] designates courthouses as low-rise-up to 4 floors, mid-rise-5 to 9 floors and highrise-10 or more floors above grade. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], 47% of courthouses are one story but they represent only 3% of total courthouse floorspace (Figure 14a). The next most common buildings are three-and four-story courthouses; together they represent 31% of all courthouses and 22% of total courthouse floorspace.

Number of Floors
USCDG [24] designates courthouses as low-rise-up to 4 floors, mid-rise-5 to 9 floors and high-rise-10 or more floors above grade. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], 47% of courthouses are one story but they represent only 3% of total courthouse floorspace (Figure 14a). The next most common buildings are three-and four-story courthouses; together they represent 31% of all courthouses and 22% of total courthouse floorspace.
The 2012 CBECS data [41] also provide the number of elevators in the building. Figure 14b plots the number of elevators versus number of floors for varying building area categories. Combining all area categories, the plot shows a general tendency of the number of elevators corresponding to the number of floors with a maximum of 12 elevators. However, for courthouses larger than 100,000 ft 2 (929 m 2 ), no such tendency is discernable. Also, the type of courthouse is not evident that determines the requirement for separate elevators for public, judges and in-custody defendants.

Number of Floors
USCDG [24] designates courthouses as low-rise-up to 4 floors, mid-rise-5 to 9 floors and highrise-10 or more floors above grade. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], 47% of courthouses are one story but they represent only 3% of total courthouse floorspace (Figure 14a). The next most common buildings are three-and four-story courthouses; together they represent 31% of all courthouses and 22% of total courthouse floorspace. The 2012 CBECS data [41] also provide the number of elevators in the building. Figure 14b plots the number of elevators versus number of floors for varying building area categories. Combining all area categories, the plot shows a general tendency of the number of elevators corresponding to the number of floors with a maximum of 12 elevators. However, for courthouses larger than 100,000 ft 2 (929 m 2 ), no such tendency is discernable. Also, the type of courthouse is not evident that determines the requirement for separate elevators for public, judges and in-custody defendants.

Windows
CBECS data provides window area as percent exterior glass categories. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], the 11-25% category for exterior glass percent is the most common (i.e., in 73% of courthouses) (Figure 15). The GSA Unit Cost Study [33] used 40% glazing for the fenestration system for federal courthouse. Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38] indicates a recent design trend of allowing more natural light in all spaces including courtrooms, as opposed to that in older courthouses which show less window area and courtrooms with no windows.

Windows
CBECS data provides window area as percent exterior glass categories. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], the 11-25% category for exterior glass percent is the most common (i.e., in 73% of courthouses) (Figure 15). The GSA Unit Cost Study [33] used 40% glazing for the fenestration system for federal courthouse. Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38] indicates a recent design trend of allowing more natural light in all spaces including courtrooms, as opposed to that in older courthouses which show less window area and courtrooms with no windows. The 2012 CBECS data [41] also provide the number of elevators in the building. Figure 14b plots the number of elevators versus number of floors for varying building area categories. Combining all area categories, the plot shows a general tendency of the number of elevators corresponding to the number of floors with a maximum of 12 elevators. However, for courthouses larger than 100,000 ft 2 (929 m 2 ), no such tendency is discernable. Also, the type of courthouse is not evident that determines the requirement for separate elevators for public, judges and in-custody defendants.

Windows
CBECS data provides window area as percent exterior glass categories. According to the 2012 CBECS data [41], the 11-25% category for exterior glass percent is the most common (i.e., in 73% of courthouses) (Figure 15). The GSA Unit Cost Study [33] used 40% glazing for the fenestration system for federal courthouse. Courthouse Retrospective book series [36][37][38] indicates a recent design trend of allowing more natural light in all spaces including courtrooms, as opposed to that in older courthouses which show less window area and courtrooms with no windows. For the properties of windows, CBECS data only provide descriptive window characteristics. Accounting for the sample weights, the predominant window characteristics for courthouse include-(a) single-layer glass (54.1% buildings) and multilayer glass (41.7%) versus combination of both (4.2%); (b) non-tinted glass (52.9%); (c) non-reflective glass (69.2%); (d) external overhangs or awnings (64.8%) and (e) no skylights or atriums (95.3% buildings).
For determining the placement of windows in different spaces in the courthouse (e.g., presence, size, sill height), one relevant consideration is found in USCDG [24] and California Trial Courts Facilities Standards [25], which specifies that for courtrooms, judges' chambers and jury assembly rooms, windows with direct line of sight from public areas, circulation zones and parking garages should be minimized to prevent observation of activities, threat exposure or communication with courthouse occupants.

HVAC System
According the 2012 CBECS data [41], natural gas is the dominant heating source, serving 81% of courthouses ( Figure 16a). Boiler is the dominant main heating system (52%), followed by packaged central heating unit (30%) (Figure 16b). Central chiller is the dominant main cooling system type (39%) ( Figure 16c); 95% of which are water cooled. Ventilation is provided centrally through variable air volume (34%) and constant air volume systems (32%) (Figure 16d). For determining the placement of windows in different spaces in the courthouse (e.g., presence, size, sill height), one relevant consideration is found in USCDG [24] and California Trial Courts Facilities Standards [25], which specifies that for courtrooms, judges' chambers and jury assembly rooms, windows with direct line of sight from public areas, circulation zones and parking garages should be minimized to prevent observation of activities, threat exposure or communication with courthouse occupants.

Prototype Decisions
With a comprehensive understanding of the building characteristics acquired from a variety of resources, the building and system characteristics required to develop the prototype building model are defined. The following sections demonstrate this step through the context of courthouse building.
Based on the statistics on US courthouses and inputs from federal and state courthouse design consultants, we propose a small, low-rise, general jurisdiction trial court (i.e., one of the state court types) for the prototype courthouse model. The functional spaces would include courtrooms and supporting areas, judges' suites, clerk's office, administration office, jury areas, detention areas, law library, other offices (for prosecuting attorney, public defender, probation and parole), circulation, secure parking and building management and support areas. The building characteristics for the prototype courthouse and the basis for their selection are described in the following sections.  (Figure 6), we propose the bottom floor to be below the ground with one side exposed for separate entrances for secured parking, services and escorted in-custody defendants. Based on Section 3.4.2, we target a wide rectangle footprint with 2.06:1 aspect ratio-that is, the average aspect ratio for the 50,000-100,000 ft 2 (4645-9290 m 2 ) bin (Figure 13b), to which the targeted 69,400 ft 2 (6447 m 2 ) floor area belongs.

Floor Layout
We developed the floor layout and area programming of the prototype courthouse in consultation with courthouse facility planning and design experts, adhering to the courthouse organizational concepts and space requirements. Targeting equal areas on all three floors and 2.06:1 aspect ratio, we developed the floor layout of court floor based on the space, location and adjacency requirements for different spaces. The remaining functional spaces were then housed on other levels inside the building footprint. With these considerations, the total floor area of the building resulted in 69,324 ft 2 (6440 m 2 ) with a footprint of 218 ft × 106 ft (66.4 m × 32.2 m). Figure 17 shows the layout of basement, first floor and second floor. The second floor is the courtroom floor housing courtrooms and supporting spaces, judges' suites and court-floor holding areas; the first floor has a public entrance lobby, clerk's office, court administration office, other offices, jury assembly area and law library; and the basement houses secured parking for judges, a central holding area and building management and support areas. The screening area for the public entrance of the building on the first floor is located outside the main building mass in line with the recommendations for security in the courthouse design guides. Separate sets of stairs and elevators are provided for the public and general staff, judges and in-custody defendants. Figure 18 shows the usable space area distribution for the prototype courthouse and confirms the suitability of the proposed area programming when compared to Figure 9. Excluding the secured covered parking, the building efficiency ratio is 67%; that is, circulation and building support areas comprise 33% of BGSF.  Figure 18 shows the usable space area distribution for the prototype courthouse and confirms the suitability of the proposed area programming when compared to Figure 9. Excluding the secured  covered parking, the building efficiency ratio is 67%; that is, circulation and building support areas comprise 33% of BGSF.

Occupancy Schedule
Based on Section 3.3.9, we adopted the occupancy schedules used for the GSA LEED Cost Study [35]. For the courtrooms, we derived a single weekly schedule from the multiple weekly schedules, taking into accounting the frequency of their use in the annual schedules of different courtrooms of the model. Figure 19 shows the space-specific weekly occupancy schedules proposed for the prototype courthouse.

Windows
Based on Section 3.4.4, we propose an 18% window-to-wall area ratio (i.e., targeting the average of the 11-25% bin range in Figure 15, which has the maximum percent frequency), punched window system with no exterior shading and a 4 ft (1.2 m) sill height to avoid direct sightline for seated occupants in certain spaces. The distribution of windows on different orientations was determined after placement of windows for different spaces, as shown in Figure 20. The thermal properties of windows

Occupancy Schedule
Based on Section 3.3.9, we adopted the occupancy schedules used for the GSA LEED Cost Study [35]. For the courtrooms, we derived a single weekly schedule from the multiple weekly schedules, taking into accounting the frequency of their use in the annual schedules of different courtrooms of the model. Figure 19 shows the space-specific weekly occupancy schedules proposed for the prototype courthouse. covered parking, the building efficiency ratio is 67%; that is, circulation and building support areas comprise 33% of BGSF.

Occupancy Schedule
Based on Section 3.3.9, we adopted the occupancy schedules used for the GSA LEED Cost Study [35]. For the courtrooms, we derived a single weekly schedule from the multiple weekly schedules, taking into accounting the frequency of their use in the annual schedules of different courtrooms of the model. Figure 19 shows the space-specific weekly occupancy schedules proposed for the prototype courthouse.

Windows
Based on Section 3.4.4, we propose an 18% window-to-wall area ratio (i.e., targeting the average of the 11-25% bin range in Figure 15, which has the maximum percent frequency), punched window system with no exterior shading and a 4 ft (1.2 m) sill height to avoid direct sightline for seated occupants in certain spaces. The distribution of windows on different orientations was determined after placement of windows for different spaces, as shown in Figure 20. The thermal properties of windows

Windows
Based on Section 3.4.4, we propose an 18% window-to-wall area ratio (i.e., targeting the average of the 11-25% bin range in Figure 15, which has the maximum percent frequency), punched window system with no exterior shading and a 4 ft (1.2 m) sill height to avoid direct sightline for seated occupants in certain spaces. The distribution of windows on different orientations was determined after placement of windows for different spaces, as shown in Figure 20. The thermal properties of windows including U-value and solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) will be based on the requirements for pre-1980

Construction
Based on Section 3.3.8, we propose mass wall construction, built-up roof, concrete basement walls and slab floor, steel-frame for interior partition walls and concrete walls for vertical shafts and detention areas. The thermal properties of building envelope components will be determined based on the requirements for pre-1980 and 1980-2004 construction vintages and ASHRAE Standard 90. 1-2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016 for the 17 ASHRAE climate zones [5], as part of prototype model development (see Section 2, Step 3).

Systems and Equipment
Based on the data described in Section 3.4.5, we propose the HVAC system comprising of natural gas-fired boilers, water-cooled chillers and VAV terminal units with hot-water reheat and a natural gas water heater for service hot water. The system efficiency, ventilation and auxiliary equipment requirements will be determined from codes and standards. These systems will be autosized to design days through energy simulation. The space-specific lighting and plug loads, temperature and humidity setpoints and ventilation requirements will be determined from codes and standards; and the schedules will follow the hours of occupancy shown in Figure 19. From Figure 14b, considering the data points for 100,000 ft 2 (929 m 2 ) or less floor area, we propose three primary elevators (2 public elevators and a judges' elevator for the three-story prototype courthouse. Considering the courtrooms of the prototype courthouse to be trial courtrooms, we propose two additional elevators for in-custody defendants.

Summary
The US Department of Energy uses a suite of Commercial Prototype Building Models, which currently includes 16 building types and covers 80% of US commercial floorspace. Efforts are underway to expand this suite by developing prototype models for additional building types. In this paper we described a systematic approach for creating prototype building models, while doing so in the pragmatic context of a courthouse building.
We divided the overall workflow of prototype model development in four steps: (1) Defining a narrative for the prototype building using databases and/or inventory of buildings and inputs from facility design experts who could advice on common building typologies, primary and secondary function in the building, space types, occupancy characteristics; (2) Prototype building planning and design using building design guides, case studies and inputs from facility design experts to determine the building size, form and geometry, area

Construction
Based on Section 3.3.8, we propose mass wall construction, built-up roof, concrete basement walls and slab floor, steel-frame for interior partition walls and concrete walls for vertical shafts and detention areas. The thermal properties of building envelope components will be determined based on the requirements for pre-1980 and 1980-2004 construction vintages and ASHRAE Standard 90. 1-2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016 for the 17 ASHRAE climate zones [5], as part of prototype model development (see Section 2, Step 3).

Systems and Equipment
Based on the data described in Section 3.4.5, we propose the HVAC system comprising of natural gas-fired boilers, water-cooled chillers and VAV terminal units with hot-water reheat and a natural gas water heater for service hot water. The system efficiency, ventilation and auxiliary equipment requirements will be determined from codes and standards. These systems will be autosized to design days through energy simulation. The space-specific lighting and plug loads, temperature and humidity setpoints and ventilation requirements will be determined from codes and standards; and the schedules will follow the hours of occupancy shown in Figure 19. From Figure 14b, considering the data points for 100,000 ft 2 (929 m 2 ) or less floor area, we propose three primary elevators (2 public elevators and a judges' elevator for the three-story prototype courthouse. Considering the courtrooms of the prototype courthouse to be trial courtrooms, we propose two additional elevators for in-custody defendants.

Summary
The US Department of Energy uses a suite of Commercial Prototype Building Models, which currently includes 16 building types and covers 80% of US commercial floorspace. Efforts are underway to expand this suite by developing prototype models for additional building types. In this paper we described a systematic approach for creating prototype building models, while doing so in the pragmatic context of a courthouse building.
We divided the overall workflow of prototype model development in four steps: (1) Defining a narrative for the prototype building using databases and/or inventory of buildings and inputs from facility design experts who could advice on common building typologies, primary and secondary function in the building, space types, occupancy characteristics; (2) Prototype building planning and design using building design guides, case studies and inputs from facility design experts to determine the building size, form and geometry, area programming, floor plans and thermal zoning, construction type and windows, system type and schedule of use of spaces; (3) Determining detailed modeling specifications based on the requirements in building codes and standards (including thermal properties of the building envelope and characteristics of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, water heating system, lighting and equipment), followed by a review by building energy codes and standards experts; (4) Prototype model development according to the established protocols and model verification by comparing simulated energy use with available measured energy use and utility data from existing building datasets.
We demonstrated the first two steps of this workflow to determine the characteristics of the prototype courthouse relevant for energy model development, while providing the rationale for these determinations. We defined the prototype courthouse to be a 69,324 ft 2 (6440 m 2 ), three-story, four-courtroom building. The floor layout and area programming were developed in consultation with courthouse design experts, adhering to the courthouse organizational concepts and space requirements. The occupancy, construction and systems characteristics were determined based on courthouse databases and documented projects. Table 2 summarizes the building characteristics for the prototype courthouse. Built-up roof on metal decking and roof insulation Fenestration system Punched window system with hypothetical windows defined by U-factor and SHGC (i.e., glass type and window frame not explicitly defined); no exterior shading; no skylights Foundation Heavyweight concrete for basement walls and floor Interior partitions Steel-frame walls; concrete for vertical shafts and detention areas

Systems and equipment b
HVAC system Gas boiler, water-cooled chiller; variable air volume (VAV) terminal box with damper and hot water reheating coil Service water heater Storage type, natural gas water heater Elevator 5 hydraulic elevators including two public elevators, one judges' elevator and two elevators for in-custody defendants a The physical properties of layers will be based on the protocols followed for the prototype models included in the DOE Commercial Prototype Building Model suite. The thermal properties of building envelop materials will be based on the requirements in codes and standards for different climates and construction vintages. Infiltration rates will be based on the infiltration modelling guidelines for commercial building energy analysis and the continuous air barrier requirements in codes and standards. b System efficiency, controls and setpoints and auxiliary equipment details will be based on the requirements in codes and standards. Systems will be autosized to design days through energy simulation. Space-specific lighting and plug loads and ventilation requirements will be based on codes and standards.
In follow-up work, these details will be supplemented with requirements in codes and standards to develop 119 versions of the prototype courthouse model to represent pre-1980 and 1980-2004 construction vintages and ASHRAE Standard 90. 1-2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016 for 17 ASHRAE climate zones. For model verification, simulated energy consumption will be compared with available measured energy use and utility data from existing courthouse building datasets.
Though the prototype courthouse represents an average-sized courthouse in the United States, the comprehensive information presented in this paper can also guide modification of the model to more accurately capture the dynamics of smaller or larger courthouses for building or system size-specific research and allow modifications that can accommodate country-specific differences While demonstrated in the context of real-world data sources for a U.S. courthouse, the authors encourage readers to leverage, extend or institute similar data collection processes that capture the unique operational characteristics of your built environment.