Fabrication of Cost-Effective Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Sheet-Like CoS 2 Films and Phthaloylchitosan-Based Gel-Polymer Electrolyte

Platinum-free counter electrodes (CE) were developed for use in efficient and cost-effective energy conversion devices, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Electrochemical deposition of CoS2 on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) formed a hierarchical sheet-like structured CoS2 thin film. This film was engaged as a cost-effective platinum-free and high-efficiency CE for DSSCs. High stability was achieved using a phthaloychitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte as the redox electrolyte. The electrocatalytic performance of the sheet-like CoS2 film was analyzed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The film displayed improved electrocatalytic behavior that can be credited to a low charge-transfer resistance at the CE/electrolyte boundary and improved exchange between triiodide and iodide ions. The fabricated DSSCs with a phthaloychitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte and sheet-like CoS2 CE had a power conversion efficiency (PCE, η) of 7.29% with a fill factor (FF) of 0.64, Jsc of 17.51 mA/cm2, and a Voc of 0.65 V, which was analogous to that of Pt CE (η = 7.82%). The high PCE of the sheet-like CoS2 CE arises from the enhanced FF and Jsc, which can be attributed to the abundant active electrocatalytic sites and enhanced interfacial charge-transfer by the well-organized surface structure.


Introduction
Recently, the emphasis on solar energy has resulted in a paradigm shift in the energy industry, resulting in lower oil prices.Solar energy has recently become a growing part of the energy industry, mostly because of government backing and subsides, due to its scientific potential and industrial applications as a renewable (at least for next 2 billion years) and sustainable energy source.To compete with other energy sources without subsides, solar cell technology must be improved in terms of efficiency, cost, large scale production, easy fabrication process, transparency, flexibility, The redox electrolyte is a key component in DSSCs.The main functions of the redox electrolyte in DSSCs are to regenerate the oxidized sensitizer dye, conduct holes in the DSSCs, and complete the external electrical circuit.The stability of DSSCs is highly dependent on the redox electrolyte and they are generally fabricated with liquid electrolytes (e.g., I − /I 3 − redox couple) with a high PCE.However, liquid electrolytes have several disadvantages including difficulty in sealing the device, lower stability due to solvent evaporation, solvent leakage, and electrode corrosion [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].
To overcome these weaknesses, a popular strategy is to use polymer electrolytes in place of liquid electrolytes.Numerous Pt-free low cost functional materials have been investigated for their good electrocatalytic activity in DSSCs, including carbon-based materials [21,22], conducting polymers [23], sulfides [24,25], selenides [26], nitrides, and carbides [27,28].Metal sulfides have fascinated significant consideration due to their distinct physical and chemical properties, high conductivity, high catalytic activity, low toxicity, abundance, and low-cost manufacturing protocol that can be easily modified for multi-purpose applications [29][30][31].Recent reports have established that cobalt sulfide-based candidates can be engaged to replace Pt electrocatalysts in DSSCs [32][33][34].The electrocatalytic performance of these materials is mostly determined by the nature of the electrocatalytic active sites and the structural morphology of the surface [13,31].Notably, carbon nanofiber and nano-felt were prepared using electrospinning and found to be low-cost, efficient counter electrodes for DSSCs [35,36].
In this study, a hierarchical structured sheet-like CoS 2 film was fabricated on FTO substrate by electrochemical deposition (ECD) using cyclic voltammetry (CV).The key advantage of the ECD process is that the coating can be deposited over large area using a low-cost manufacturing technique, which can easily be implemented on an industrial scale resulting in good adhesion to the FTO substrates and a uniform coating.In this study, the fabricated solar cells used a polymer gel electrolyte based on phthaloylchitosan.Herein, we have investigated the use of CoS 2 as a cheap electrocatalyst for use in gel-polymer electrolyte-based DSSCs to achieve long-term stability while maintaining a high PCE.

XRD Studies
The XRD pattern of the electrochemically deposited CoS 2 thin film on an FTO is shown in Figure 1.Diffraction peaks can be observed at 33.2 • , 37.6 • , 42.6 • , and 57.8 • which correspond to the (200), (210), (211), and (311) diffraction planes of cubic CoS 2 .The experimental diffraction peaks match the standard cubic CoS 2 data (PDF card No. 01-077-7559).The other major diffraction peaks are all related to the pure FTO conducting glass substrate, which are in agreement with our previous report [13].The observed minor diffraction peaks of CoS 2 on FTO substrate might be due to the deposition thickness of CoS 2 film was low content on surface of the FTO glass substrate.
The observed minor diffraction peaks of CoS2 on FTO substrate might be due to the deposition thickness of CoS2 film was low content on surface of the FTO glass substrate.

Morphology and Elemental Composition Studies
Figure 2a shows the morphological and structural details of the as-deposited CoS2 film, examined by HRSEM and the corresponding image is shown in Figure 2a.The HRSEM image shows that the pure CoS2 (Figure 2a) exhibits a sheet-like surface morphology, with some domains comprising a very large quantity of aggregated and irregular particles.The well-organized surface morphology of CoS2 with firmly stuffed nanocrystals was expected to support efficient charge transport processes at the boundary of the CE surface and gel-polymer redox electrolyte in the prepared DSSCs [9,30].The HRSEM analysis also revealed that the FTO conducting glass substrate and the as-deposited CoS2 layers were extremely compatible.Fine adhesion was observed between the FTO glass substrate and the CoS2 materials and is a significant parameter for defining the stability and PCE of the assembled DSSCs.The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis of the electrochemically-deposited CoS2 thin film was performed and shown in Figure 2b, and the pure CoS2 comprised Co. and S. The additional peaks in Figure 2b likely arise from the FTO [13].The EDS analysis also revealed the development of the CoS2 film on the FTO.

Morphology and Elemental Composition Studies
Figure 2a shows the morphological and structural details of the as-deposited CoS 2 film, examined by HRSEM and the corresponding image is shown in Figure 2a.The HRSEM image shows that the pure CoS 2 (Figure 2a) exhibits a sheet-like surface morphology, with some domains comprising a very large quantity of aggregated and irregular particles.The well-organized surface morphology of CoS 2 with firmly stuffed nanocrystals was expected to support efficient charge transport processes at the boundary of the CE surface and gel-polymer redox electrolyte in the prepared DSSCs [9,30].The HRSEM analysis also revealed that the FTO conducting glass substrate and the as-deposited CoS 2 layers were extremely compatible.Fine adhesion was observed between the FTO glass substrate and the CoS 2 materials and is a significant parameter for defining the stability and PCE of the assembled DSSCs.The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis of the electrochemically-deposited CoS 2 thin film was performed and shown in Figure 2b, and the pure CoS 2 comprised Co. and S. The additional peaks in Figure 2b likely arise from the FTO [13].The EDS analysis also revealed the development of the CoS 2 film on the FTO.The observed minor diffraction peaks of CoS2 on FTO substrate might be due to the deposition thickness of CoS2 film was low content on surface of the FTO glass substrate.

Morphology and Elemental Composition Studies
Figure 2a shows the morphological and structural details of the as-deposited CoS2 film, examined by HRSEM and the corresponding image is shown in Figure 2a.The HRSEM image shows that the pure CoS2 (Figure 2a) exhibits a sheet-like surface morphology, with some domains comprising a very large quantity of aggregated and irregular particles.The well-organized surface morphology of CoS2 with firmly stuffed nanocrystals was expected to support efficient charge transport processes at the boundary of the CE surface and gel-polymer redox electrolyte in the prepared DSSCs [9,30].The HRSEM analysis also revealed that the FTO conducting glass substrate and the as-deposited CoS2 layers were extremely compatible.Fine adhesion was observed between the FTO glass substrate and the CoS2 materials and is a significant parameter for defining the stability and PCE of the assembled DSSCs.The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis of the electrochemically-deposited CoS2 thin film was performed and shown in Figure 2b, and the pure CoS2 comprised Co. and S. The additional peaks in Figure 2b likely arise from the FTO [13].The EDS analysis also revealed the development of the CoS2 film on the FTO.

Electrocatalytic Activity
Electrochemical performance of the as-deposited CoS2 film and Pt CEs for the catalytic reduction of I3 − to I − was investigated by CV using a three-electrode configuration at 150 mV/s.An electrolyte solution containing of 0.01 M I2, 0.1 M LiI, and 0.1 M LiClO4 as a supporting medium in acetonitrile was used.The CVs of the CoS2 electrocatalyst for the I − /I3 − redox species is shown in Figure 3.The redox peaks (Ox-2/Red-2, Ox-1/Red-1) contained two pairs for both the CoS2 and Pt electrodes.The configuration of right and left redox pairs are shown in Equations ( 1) and (2). (1) As shown in Figure 3, the shape of the CVs of the CoS2 electrode was similar to that of conventional Pt electrodes under identical operating conditions, which demonstrated similar electrocatalytic behaviors for the I − /I3 − redox species.

Electrocatalytic Activity
Electrochemical performance of the as-deposited CoS2 film and Pt CEs for the catalytic reduction of I3 − to I − was investigated by CV using a three-electrode configuration at 150 mV/s.An electrolyte solution containing of 0.01 M I2, 0.1 M LiI, and 0.1 M LiClO4 as a supporting medium in acetonitrile was used.The CVs of the CoS2 electrocatalyst for the I − /I3 − redox species is shown in Figure 3.The redox peaks (Ox-2/Red-2, Ox-1/Red-1) contained two pairs for both the CoS2 and Pt electrodes.The configuration of right and left redox pairs are shown in Equations ( 1) and ( 2). (1) As shown in Figure 3, the shape of the CVs of the CoS2 electrode was similar to that of conventional Pt electrodes under identical operating conditions, which demonstrated similar electrocatalytic behaviors for the I − /I3 − redox species.As shown in Figure 3, the shape of the CVs of the CoS 2 electrode was similar to that of conventional Pt electrodes under identical operating conditions, which demonstrated similar electrocatalytic behaviors for the I − /I 3 − redox species.
Energies 2018, 11, 281 Electrocatalytic performance of the fabricated CE was investigated by examining the peak-to-peak separation (Epp) and peak current density (PCD or J pk ).For efficient electrocatalytic reduction, electrode materials should possess a low Epp and high J pk .Higher J pk values indicate that the reaction rate is faster, whereas a low Epp indicates a smaller over-potential, leading to improved electrocatalytic performance for the reduction of I 3 − [13,31].The J pk and Epp of the CoS 2 electrode was equivalent to that of the Pt electrode.The experimental CV analysis indicated that the CoS 2 film possesses better performance for the reduction of I 3 − in DSSCs related to the Pt CE.
Figure 4a shows the CV with various scan rates for CoS 2 electrode I − /I 3 − redox reaction.The J pk tended to increase when the scan rate was increased along with a steady shift of the cathodic and anodic peaks in the direction of positive and negative sides, respectively.This indicates that the inner sites of CoS 2 became more reactive at higher scan rates [10,13].The linear association between the peak current density and the square root of the scan rates is shown in Figure 4b.The results presented here are consistent with the Langmuir isotherm rule, and the linear correlation indicates that the transport of I − on the surface of the CoS 2 electrode is influenced by the diffusion control of the redox response [12].The CV results evidence that the CoS 2 has huge prospective to engage as CEs of DSSCs. Figure 4a shows the CV with various scan rates for CoS2 electrode I − /I3 − redox reaction.The tended to increase when the scan rate was increased along with a steady shift of the cathodic and anodic peaks in the direction of positive and negative sides, respectively.This indicates that the inner sites of CoS2 became more reactive at higher scan rates [10,13].The linear association between the peak current density and the square root of the scan rates is shown in Figure 4b.The results presented here are consistent with the Langmuir isotherm rule, and the linear correlation indicates that the transport of I − on the surface of the CoS2 electrode is influenced by the diffusion control of the redox response [12].The CV results evidence that the CoS2has huge prospective to engage as CEs of DSSCs.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Studies
Electrocatalytic activity of the as-deposited CoS2 film was examined by EIS measurement and the resultant Nyquist plot is shown in Figure 5. Charge transfer processes, internal resistance, and the electrocatalytic behavior of the electrodes were effectively determined using the EIS technique

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Studies
Electrocatalytic activity of the as-deposited CoS 2 film was examined by EIS measurement and the resultant Nyquist plot is shown in Figure 5. Charge transfer processes, internal resistance, and the electrocatalytic behavior of the electrodes were effectively determined using the EIS technique [9].The intercept between the high frequency and real axis (Z'-axis) in the Nyquist plot represents the series Energies 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 12 [9].The intercept between the high frequency and real axis (Z'-axis) in the Nyquist plot represents the series resistance (Rs), and the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) is determined by the area covered under the first semicircle formed at a higher frequency.Moreover, the Nyquist plot contained a second semicircle, which indicates charge recombination between I3 − ions in the electrolyte and the TiO2 photoelectrode.Thus, the second semicircle represents the Rct at the interface of the TiO2/dye/electrolyte.The focus of the analysis was directed at the first semicircle because it describes the excellent electrocatalytic performance for the I3 − reduction at the interface of CE/electrolyte.This improved performance was due to the low Rct of the CD, which consequently improved the FF value of the fabricated DSSC device [31].The Rct value estimated from the Nyquist plot using Z-view software for the CoS2 electrode was 44.63 Ω, comparable to that of the Pt electrode (41.33 Ω).This suggests that the CoS2 film is as efficient as the Pt CE for the reduction of I3 − to I − in the fabricated DSSCs.The EIS measurements are in agreement with the CV analysis.

Photovoltaic Performance of the DSSCs
Photovoltaic features of the assembled DSSCs [FTO/TiO2:N3/gel-polymer electrolyte/sheet-like CoS2/FTO] under an illumination of 1 sun intensity 100 mW/cm 2 (AM 1.5) was investigated.The resulting J-V curves of the DSSCs are displayed in Figure 6a, and the acquired photovoltaic factors comprising short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), FF, and PCE (η) are listed in Table 1.The fabricated DSSCs have a PCE of 7.29% with anFF of 0.64, Voc of 0.65 V, and Jsc of 17.51 mA/cm 2 , which is equivalent to the conventional Pt CE (η of 7.82%).The high PCE of the sheet-like CoS2 CE is mostly due to its enhanced FF and Jsc values, which can be attributed to abundant active electrocatalytic sites and enhanced interfacial charge-transfer by the well-organized surface structure of the CoS2 CE.The stability test of the DSSCs fabricated using sheet-like CoS2 and Pt CEs was performed.The DSSCs fabricated with the sheet-like CoS2 CE retained approximately 82% of its original performance over seven days, whereas the DSSC with the Pt CE retained approximately 90% of its original performance over the same period.This indicates that the stability of the sheet-like CoS2CE was analogous to that of the standard Pt CE, and have the potential to be engaged as low cost replacements for Pt CEs in the construction of highly efficient and stable DSSCs.Figure 6b, show the distribution of device performance for 30 devices are shown as a histogram [20,37,38].

Photovoltaic Performance of the DSSCs
Photovoltaic features of the assembled DSSCs [FTO/TiO 2 :N 3 /gel-polymer electrolyte/sheet-like CoS 2 /FTO] under an illumination of 1 sun intensity 100 mW/cm 2 (AM 1.5) was investigated.The resulting J-V curves of the DSSCs are displayed in Figure 6a, and the acquired photovoltaic factors comprising short-circuit current density (J sc ), open-circuit voltage (V oc ), FF, and PCE (η) are listed in Table 1.The fabricated DSSCs have a PCE of 7.29% with anFF of 0.64, V oc of 0.65 V, and J sc of 17.51 mA/cm 2 , which is equivalent to the conventional Pt CE (η of 7.82%).The high PCE of the sheet-like CoS 2 CE is mostly due to its enhanced FF and J sc values, which can be attributed to abundant active electrocatalytic sites and enhanced interfacial charge-transfer by the well-organized surface structure of the CoS 2 CE.The stability test of the DSSCs fabricated using sheet-like CoS 2 and Pt CEs was performed.The DSSCs fabricated with the sheet-like CoS 2 CE retained approximately 82% of its original performance over seven days, whereas the DSSC with the Pt CE retained approximately 90% of its original performance over the same period.This indicates that the stability of the sheet-like CoS 2 CE was analogous to that of the standard Pt CE, and have the potential to be engaged as low cost replacements for Pt CEs in the construction of highly efficient and stable DSSCs.Figure 6b, show the distribution of device performance for 30 devices are shown as a histogram [20,37,38].Schematic illustration of the electron transfer process in the DSSCs assembled with phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte and a CoS2 CE is shown in Figure 7. Upon illumination, the N3 dye molecule is photoexcited and the excited dye molecule transfers its electrons to the conduction band (CB) of the TiO2 electrode.Then, the photoexcited dye molecule regenerates its electrons from the redox mediator in the phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte.Consequently, the oxidized I − ions are reduced to I3 − at the CoS2 CE.This cycle is facilitated by the  Schematic illustration of the electron transfer process in the DSSCs assembled with phthaloylchitosanbased gel-polymer electrolyte and a CoS 2 CE is shown in Figure 7. Upon illumination, the N 3 dye molecule is photoexcited and the excited dye molecule transfers its electrons to the conduction band (CB) of the TiO 2 electrode.Then, the photoexcited dye molecule regenerates its electrons from the redox mediator in the phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte.Consequently, the oxidized I −

Electrochemical Deposition of the Sheet-Like CoS2 Films
FTO substrates were washed several times with water and ethanol consecutively and kept in an ultrasonic bath filled with isopropanol for 15 min before deposition.The CoS2 film was electrodeposited via CV technique with an electrochemical system (CHI608E, CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) featuring a three-electrode assembly.The three electrodes were (i) a saturated aqueous Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode; (ii) Pt wire as a CE; and (iii) a precleared FTO as the working electrode.The electrochemical deposition solution was prepared using 0.05 M CoCl2•6H2O and 1.0 M H2HCSNH2 dissolved in 50 mL of water and subjected to magnetic stirring for 15 min.The pH of the electrodeposition solution was maintained at 7.5 by adding ammonia dropwise.The potential range of electrodeposition of the CoS2 film was from −1.2 to 0.2 V at a scan rate of 5 mVs −1 for 25 sweep cycles.Lastly, the electrodeposited CoS2 film was rinsed with water and dried at ordinary temperature.

Preparation of the Phthaloylchitosan-Based Gel-Polymer Electrolyte
The phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte was prepared according to previous studies with slight alterations [9].For instance, a fixed 1.3 wt % poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, Mw~5,000,000), 5.0 wt % phthaloylchitosan, 31.5 wt % dimethylformamide, 22.7 wt % tetrapropylammonium iodide, and 37.8 wt % ethylene carbonate was kept in a closed container and magnetically stirred at 80 °C for 2 h.After homogeneous gel formation, heating was stopped and the

Electrochemical Deposition of the Sheet-Like CoS 2 Films
FTO substrates were washed several times with water and ethanol consecutively and kept in an ultrasonic bath filled with isopropanol for 15 min before deposition.The CoS 2 film was electrodeposited via CV technique with an electrochemical system (CHI608E, CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) featuring a three-electrode assembly.The three electrodes were (i) a saturated aqueous Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode; (ii) Pt wire as a CE; and (iii) a precleared FTO as the working electrode.The electrochemical deposition solution was prepared using 0.05 M CoCl 2 •6H 2 O and 1.0 M H 2 HCSNH 2 dissolved in 50 mL of water and subjected to magnetic stirring for 15 min.The pH of the electrodeposition solution was maintained at 7.5 by adding ammonia dropwise.The potential range of electrodeposition of the CoS 2 film was from −1.2 to 0.2 V at a scan rate of 5 mVs −1 for 25 sweep cycles.Lastly, the electrodeposited CoS 2 film was rinsed with water and dried at ordinary temperature.

Preparation of the Phthaloylchitosan-Based Gel-Polymer Electrolyte
The phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte was prepared according to previous studies with slight alterations [9].For instance, a fixed 1.3 wt % poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, Mw~5,000,000), 5.0 wt % phthaloylchitosan, 31.5 wt % dimethylformamide, 22.7 wt % tetrapropylammonium iodide, and 37.8 wt % ethylene carbonate was kept in a closed container and magnetically stirred at 80 • C for Energies 2018, 11, 281 9 of 12 2 h.After homogeneous gel formation, heating was stopped and the mixture was cooled naturally.Then, 1.7 wt % iodine was added and stirred to obtain a homogeneous phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte.

Assembly of the DSSCs
The TiO 2 photoelectrode was prepared in two layers, in which the first was a compact layer prepared by spin coating and the second layer was a porous layer deposited on the first using the doctor blade method.The detailed procedure for the preparation of the TiO 2 photoelectrode was provided in previous reports [12,30].The TiO 2 coated area on the FTO substrate was coated 0.5 × 0.5 cm and the thickness was around 50 µm.The as-prepared TiO 2 photoelectrode was sensitized by immersion in a 3 mM ethanol solution of N 3 dye for 24 h.The sensitized photoelectrode layer was then rinsed with ethanol solution and dried with hot air.Next, the prepared gel-polymer electrolyte (phthaloylchitosan) was spread uniformly on top of the dye-sensitized TiO 2 layer.Finally, the electrodeposited CoS 2 film CE and prepared dye-sensitized TiO 2 photoelectrode were clamped together to form a sandwich type DSSC.The active device area was 0.2 cm 2 and photovoltaic investigations were executed in the air atmosphere.The assembled device configuration was FTO/TiO 2 /N 3 /Gel-polymer electrolyte/CoS 2 /FTO.The flow chart for the fabrication of the DSSC device is shown in Figure 8.
Energies 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 12 mixture was cooled naturally.Then, 1.7 wt % iodine was added and stirred to obtain a homogeneous phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte.

Assembly of the DSSCs
The TiO2 photoelectrode was prepared in two layers, in which the first was a compact layer prepared by spin coating and the second layer was a porous layer deposited on the first using the doctor blade method.The detailed procedure for the preparation of the TiO2 photoelectrode was provided in previous reports [12,30].The TiO2 coated area on the FTO substrate was coated 0.5 × 0.5 cm and the thickness was around 50 µm.The as-prepared TiO2 photoelectrode was sensitized by immersion in a 3 mM ethanol solution of N3 dye for 24 h.The sensitized photoelectrode layer was then rinsed with ethanol solution and dried with hot air.Next, the prepared gel-polymer electrolyte (phthaloylchitosan) was spread uniformly on top of the dye-sensitized TiO2 layer.Finally, the electrodeposited CoS2 film CE and prepared dye-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrode were clamped together to form a sandwich type DSSC.The active device area was 0.2 cm 2 and photovoltaic investigations were executed in the air atmosphere.The assembled device configuration was FTO/TiO2/N3/Gel-polymer electrolyte/CoS2/FTO.The flow chart for the fabrication of the DSSC device is shown in Figure 8.

Characterization Techniques
An X-ray diffractometer (Mini Flex II, Rigaku, The Woodlands, TX, USA) with irradiation of Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) at a scan rate of 4°/min was used to analyze the XRD pattern of the electrochemically deposited CoS2 thin film.High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) (Quanta FEG 200) with a voltage of 20 kV was used to determine the structural morphology of the fabricated CoS2 thin film.The HRSEM was also equipped with EDS, which was utilized to define the elemental composition of the film.A tri-electrode (triode) system with Pt-wire as the CE, Ag/AgCl (non-aqueous) as the reference electrode and sheet-like CoS2 film as the working electrode was used to measure the CV in 100 mM LiClO4, 1 mM I2, and 10 mM LiI in acetonitrile.To maintain an inert environment, the solution was N2 purged for 15 min prior to CV analysis, and the CV curves were measured over a voltage range of −0.6 to +1.2 V.The AC-impedance method with a frequency range

Characterization Techniques
An X-ray diffractometer (Mini Flex II, Rigaku, The Woodlands, TX, USA) with irradiation of Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) at a scan rate of 4 • /min was used to analyze the XRD pattern of the electrochemically deposited CoS 2 thin film.High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) (Quanta FEG 200) with a voltage of 20 kV was used to determine the structural morphology of the fabricated CoS 2 thin film.The HRSEM was also equipped with EDS, which was utilized to define the elemental composition of the film.A tri-electrode (triode) system with Pt-wire as the CE, Ag/AgCl (non-aqueous) as the reference electrode and sheet-like CoS 2 film as the working electrode was used to measure the CV in 100 mM LiClO 4 , 1 mM I 2 , and 10 mM LiI in acetonitrile.To maintain an inert environment, the solution was N 2 purged for 15 min prior to CV analysis, and the CV curves were measured over a voltage range of −0.6 to +1.2 V.The AC-impedance method with a frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 1.0 MHz and the EIS measurements was carried out in an applied bias at 5 mV AC amplitude.A solar simulator PEC-L01 (PECCELL Inc., Yokohama, Japan) was engaged to investigate photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of the fabricated DSSCs under 1 sun (100 mW•cm −2 ) irradiation.The FF and PCE of the fabricated DSSCs with CoS 2 CE in a phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte were determined with the methods detailed in previous reports [1,6].

Conclusions
In summary, a hierarchical sheet-like structured CoS 2 thin film was electrochemically deposited onto an FTO substrate via a simple CV technique.The resulting device was examined using various characterization methods including XRD, HRSEM, and EDS analysis, which revealed the structural properties, surface morphology, and elemental composition of the as-deposited CoS

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.XRD pattern of the as-deposited CoS2 film.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.XRD pattern of the as-deposited CoS 2 film.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.XRD pattern of the as-deposited CoS2 film.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) Representative HR-SEM image of the electrodeposited CoS 2 film on FTO; and (b) EDS spectra of the CoS 2 film.

2. 3 .
Electrocatalytic Activity Electrochemical performance of the as-deposited CoS 2 film and Pt CEs for the catalytic reduction of I 3 − to I − was investigated by CV using a three-electrode configuration at 150 mV/s.An electrolyte solution containing of 0.01 M I 2 , 0.1 M LiI, and 0.1 M LiClO 4 as a supporting medium in acetonitrile was used.The CVs of the CoS 2 electrocatalyst for the I − /I 3 − redox species is shown in Figure 3.The redox peaks (Ox-2/Red-2, Ox-1/Red-1) contained two pairs for both the CoS 2 and Pt electrodes.The configuration of right and left redox pairs are shown in Equations (1) and (2).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) Representative HR-SEM image of the electrodeposited CoS2 film on FTO; and (b) EDS spectra of the CoS2 film.

Energies 2018 ,
11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 12 Electrocatalytic performance of the fabricated CE was investigated by examining the peak-topeak separation (Epp) and peak current density (PCD or ).For efficient electrocatalytic reduction, electrode materials should possess a low Epp and high .Higher values indicate that the reaction rate is faster, whereas a low Epp indicates a smaller over-potential, leading to improved electrocatalytic performance for the reduction of I3 − [13,31].The and Epp of the CoS2 electrode was equivalent to that of the Pt electrode.The experimental CV analysis indicated that the CoS2 film possesses better performance for the reduction of I3 − in DSSCs related to the Pt CE.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of the CoS2 electrode at various scan rates; and (b) linear association between the redox peak current and square root of the scan rate.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of the CoS 2 electrode at various scan rates; and (b) linear association between the redox peak current and square root of the scan rate.
s ), and the charge-transfer resistance (R ct ) is determined by the area covered under the first semicircle formed at a higher frequency.Moreover, the Nyquist plot contained a second semicircle, which indicates charge recombination between I 3 − ions in the electrolyte and the TiO 2 photoelectrode.Thus, the second semicircle represents the R ct at the interface of the TiO 2 /dye/electrolyte.The focus of the analysis was directed at the first semicircle because it describes the excellent electrocatalytic performance for the I 3 − reduction at the interface of CE/electrolyte.This improved performance was due to the low R ct of the CD, which consequently improved the FF value of the fabricated DSSC device[31].The R ct value estimated from the Nyquist plot using Z-view software for the CoS 2 electrode was 44.63 Ω, comparable to that of the Pt electrode (41.33 Ω).This suggests that the CoS 2 film is as efficient as the Pt CE for the reduction of I 3 − to I − in the fabricated DSSCs.The EIS measurements are in agreement with the CV analysis.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of EIS for the CoS2 and Pt CEs.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of EIS for the CoS 2 and Pt CEs.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) J-V curves of the DSSCs fabricated with a phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte using CoS2 and Pt CEs; (b) the histogram distribution of device parameters such as PCE, Jsc, FF and Voc for 30 solar cell test under above said operational parameters.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) J-V curves of the DSSCs fabricated with a phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte using CoS 2 and Pt CEs; (b) the histogram distribution of device parameters such as PCE, J sc , FF and V oc for 30 solar cell test under above said operational parameters.
to I 3 − at the CoS 2 CE.This cycle is facilitated by the constant flow of electrons from the dye-sensitized TiO 2 photoelectrode to the CoS 2 CE via an outer circuit.Energies 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 12 constant flow of electrons from the dye-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrode to the CoS2 CE via an outer circuit.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the fabricated DSSC based on the CoS2 CE under illumination.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the fabricated DSSC based on the CoS 2 CE under illumination.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Flowchart describing the fabrication of the DSSCs.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Flowchart describing the fabrication of the DSSCs.
2 film.CV and EIS analyses indicated improved electrocatalytic behavior of the sheet-like structured CoS 2 thin film for the reduction of I 3 − to I − ions and low R ct at the boundary of the CoS 2 CE/electrolyte.Subsequently, the as-deposited sheet-like CoS 2 film was used as a cost-effective and highly efficient Pt-free CE for the fabrication of DSSCs.A phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte was used as a redox electrolyte for the fabrication of stable DSSCs.The fabricated DSSCs with phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte and sheet-like CoS 2 CE exhibited an overall PCE of 7.29%, which was comparable to that of conventional Pt CE-based DSSCs (7.20%).The sheet-like structured CoS 2 thin film showed high electrocatalytic activity for the I − /I 3 − redox reaction, which was attributed to abundant active electrocatalytic sites and improved interfacial charge transfer by the well-organized surface structure of the CoS 2 CE.These results indicated that the sheet-like CoS 2 film and phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte could be used to solve the challenge of fabricating highly efficient, low-cost, and stable DSSCs.

Table 1 .
Photovoltaic parameters of the DSSCs fabricated with phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte using CoS2 and Pt CEs.

Table 1 .
Photovoltaic parameters of the DSSCs fabricated with phthaloylchitosan-based gel-polymer electrolyte using CoS 2 and Pt CEs.