The Impact of Background-Level Carboxylated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs−COOH) on Induced Toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans and Human Cells

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are widely utilized for industrial, biomedical, and environmental purposes. The toxicity of Carboxylated SWCNTs (SWCNTs−COOH) in in vivo models, particularly Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), and in vitro human cells is still unclear. In this study, C. elegans was used to study the effects of SWCNTs−COOH on lethality, lifespan, growth, reproduction, locomotion, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and the antioxidant system. Our data show that exposure to ≥1 μg·L−1 SWCNTs−COOH could induce toxicity in nematodes that affects lifespan, growth, reproduction, and locomotion behavior. Moreover, the exposure of nematodes to SWCNTs−COOH induced ROS generation and the alteration of antioxidant gene expression. SWCNTs−COOH induced nanotoxic effects at low dose of 0.100 or 1.00 μg·L−1, particularly for the expression of antioxidants (SOD-3, CTL-2 and CYP-35A2). Similar nanotoxic effects were found in human cells. A low dose of SWCNTs−COOH induced ROS generation and increased the expression of catalase, MnSOD, CuZnSOD, and SOD-2 mRNA but decreased the expression of GPX-2 and GPX-3 mRNA in human monocytes. These findings reveal that background-level SWCNTs−COOH exerts obvious adverse effects, and C. elegans is a sensitive in vivo model that can be used for the biological evaluation of the toxicity of nanomaterials.


Introduction
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), which are man-made materials with at least one dimension in the size range of 1-100 nm, have attracted strong interest for research and realworld applications in industrial processes and consumer products. Due to their widespread use, ENMs are inevitably released into the environment. This has prompted great scientific and public concern as to the ecological and human health risks resulting from exposure to ENMs [1]. In particular, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are known to exhibit attractive mechanical, magnetic, optical, thermal, chemical, surface, and, most importantly, electric properties that surpass those of other carbon nanotube (CNT) variants [2][3][4]. Ever Short and long-term exposure to cysteine-functionalized SWCNTs was reported to have no effect on the lifespan, reproduction, and locomotion of C. elegans at concentrations of 50, 100, and 250 µg·mL −1 [44]. However, the toxicological effects of SWCNTs−COOH on C. elegans are still unclear.
Notwithstanding the extensive application of nanomaterials, little is known regarding the impacts of these materials on animal and human health. Therefore, the present study was aimed at investigating the possible toxicity of SWCNTs−COOH using in vitro cultured human cells and an in vivo wild-type C. elegans model. The different toxicological endpoints of C. elegans were investigated, including physical observations, distribution, translocation, co-localization with ROS, and antioxidant and oxidative stress responses. Finally, we also evaluated the immune response of SWCNTs−COOH on the human monocytic cell line, THP-1. The results from this study may contribute to the existing body of global data on in vivo nanotoxicity testing of the SWCNTs variants.

Characterization of SWCNTs−COOH
Characterization was performed in the Instrument Center of National Cheng Kung University. The morphology of SWCNTs−COOH in K-medium was examined using a JEOL JEM-7000F transmission electron microscopy (TEM). An elemental analysis was conducted using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). For the TEM and EDS analyses, aliquots of the sample were dropped on copper mesh and air-dried at room temperature. Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results are cited from our earlier study using the same SWCNTs−COOH sample [21].
2.3. C. elegans Maintenance, Acute Exposure Treatment, Lifespan, and Lethality Assays of C. elegans N2 nematodes were maintained on OP50 E. coli-seeded nematode growth medium (NGM) plates at 22 • C. Synchronization of N2 cultivated nematodes was done using the alkaline bleaching method, as described previously [45]. After growth from the synchronized L1 nematodes, the L3 or young·L4 nematodes were rinsed from the plate with K-medium and centrifuged at 2500× g for 4 min. The worm pellet was diluted with K-medium, and approximately 200 L3/young·L4 nematodes were dispensed in each well of the 12-well plate. The SWCNTs−COOH were pre-dispersed in K medium by sonication for 30 min (40 kHz, 100 W). After starvation for 24 h, the nematodes were exposed to 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, or 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH for 24 h (acute exposure), and then 50 worms were transferred onto NGM plates without OP50. The nematodes were gently prodded using the worm picker to assess their viability. Worms that were non-responsive to a stimulus were considered dead. For the lethality assay, the N2 wild type strain nematodes were transferred to fresh NGM plates after acute exposure and scored as dead or alive, while for the lifespan assay, the nematodes were transferred every day to fresh NGM plates, and their survival was scored for a duration of 24 days. These assays were done in triplicate for each concentration.

Growth Measurement of C. elegans
The current study measured the lengths of nematodes to assess the effects of SWCNTs− COOH on growth. After exposure to the different concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH for 24 h, the nematodes were transferred to NGM plates with OP50 lawn and incubated for 48 h until the old L4 stage. An Olympus SZX10 dissecting microscope was used to obtain images, while ImageJ software [46] was used to measure the length of each of the nematodes. Three worms were measured for each concentration.

Locomotion Assay of C. elegans
Twenty L3/young·L4 nematodes were dispensed in each well of a 12-well plate and starved for 24 h, before undergoing an assessment of their locomotion behavior following exposure to the different concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH for 24 h. Head thrashing and body bending were used to assess the locomotion behavior of C. elegans. The evaluation of head thrashing and body bending was described in a previous study [41]. Head thrashing was defined as a change in the direction of mid-body bending, while body bending was described as a direction change of the nematode part corresponding to the posterior bulb of the pharynx with respect to the y axis while the nematode was traveling along the x axis. Head thrashing was scored for 1 min, while body bends were counted in an interval of 20 s. Three replicates were performed for each concentration.

Reproductive Assay of C. elegans
Following acute exposure, L3/young·L4 nematodes were assessed for 4 to 5 days of egg-laying. One L3/young·L4 nematode was dispensed in each well of a 12-well NGM plate with fresh OP50 lawn. Each nematode was transferred to a new plate every 2 days during spawning. The old plates containing the eggs were hatched and incubated to L4 nematodes to make it easier to count offspring. The total number of offspring for each of the worms was counted. Twelve worms were evaluated per treatment group.

Intracellular ROS Staining
The N2 nematodes were exposed as described above. After acute exposure, the worms were transferred and maintained in fresh NGM plates for 8 days (based on what day a surviving population of almost 50% was observed). Therefore, the intracellular ROS level of the nematodes was evaluated after 8 days of exposure to SWCNTs−COOH at all concentrations. The examined nematodes were exposed to 5 µM of dehydroethidium (DHE) dye and incubated at room temperature in the absence of light for 30 min. The supernatant was discarded afterwards. An Olympus FV1000 laser-scanning confocal microscope was used to determine the ROS levels.

Intracellular ROS Localization Assays of C. elegans
A laser-scanning confocal microscope was used to detect the SWCNTs−COOH nanomaterials conjugated with Rhodamine B [44]. Rho B was adsorbed on the SWCNTs−COOH surface to track its distribution in the nematodes. The preparation of Rhodamine Bconjugated SWCNTs−COOH was described previously [41]. Rho B-conjugated SWCNTs− COOH nanomaterials were prepared by mixing Rho B solution (1 mg·mL −1 , 0.3 mL) with an aqueous suspension of SWCNTs−COOH (0.1 mg·mL −1 , 5 mL). The mixture solution was then subjected to dialysis against distilled water for 72 h to remove unbound Rho B. The nematodes were exposed to 1000 µg/L of SWCNTs−COOH /Rho B and incubated for 3 h in the absence of light at room temperature. The nematodes were then washed with K medium and exposed to 5 µM of CellROX™ (green) for 30 min for ROS staining. The exposed nematodes were then observed under the laser scanning confocal microscope.

Cell Viability and ROS Generation Assays of THP-1 Cells
The human monocyte cell line THP-1 was cultured at 37 • C (5% CO 2 with humidity) in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The THP-1 cells were resuspended in fresh media at a concentration of 2 × 10 5 mL −1 , 0.1 mL per well in 96-well plates and reacted with a 20 mM 2 ,7 -dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe for 30 min. Following treatment with SWCNTs−COOH at all concentrations for 6 h, the fluorescence intensity of the stained cells was measured at 485 nm (excitation) and 527 nm (emission) to determine the ROS level. Cell viability was determined by Alamar Blue assay. The THP-1 cells were resuspended in fresh media at a concentration of 2 × 10 6 mL −1 , with 0.1 mL per well in 96-well plates, and reacted with 10% Alamar Blue reagent for 30 min. Following treatment with SWCNTs−COOH at all concentrations for 48 h, the fluorescence intensity of the stained cells was measured at 530-560 nm (excitation) and 590 nm (emission). Data were calculated as the percent (%) relative to the untreated control, which was set at 100%. Three replicates were performed for each of the concentrations.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Assays
Total RNA from each sample was isolated from C. elegans and the THP-1 cells using TRIzol Reagent and reverse-transcribed with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit. For real-time PCR, cDNA (50 ng) was amplified with SYBR green PCR master mix through a 95 • C denaturation stage for 10 min, followed by 40 repetitions of 95 • C for 15 s and then 60 • C for 1 min using an Applied Biosystems PRISM 7500 fast real-time PCR system. For C. elegans, we quantified the expression of superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1), SOD-3, ctl-2, mtl-2, cyp-35A2, and actin-1 mRNA. For human THP-1 cells, we quantified the expression of catalase, MnSOD, CuZnSOD, SOD-2, glutathione peroxidase (GPX)-1-4, and GAPDH mRNA. Sequences for the primers used are shown in Table 1.

Statistical Analysis
The locomotion, brood size, and length measurement data were observed to be nonnormally distributed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A survival plot or Kaplan-Meier plot was constructed to evaluate the effects of the different concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH on the lifespan or ageing of the nematodes. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the significant difference of each the concentrations in comparison with the control. The survival plot (Kaplan-Meier plot) was constructed for the lifespan data using GraphPad Prism 6 (San Diego, CA, USA). The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine the significance of each of the days. Days with significance were chosen and tested further. Each of the concentrations from the chosen days was compared with the control using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 23 (International Business Machines Corp., New York, NY, USA). In these analyses, p < 0.05 represented a statistically significant result.

Characterization of SWCNTs−COOH
The K-medium is a solution with high ionic strength and, therefore, the dispersion of SWCNTs−COOH in this solution is important when considering their bioavailability for toxicity testing. The SWCNTs−COOH slightly aggregated in the solution, as observed in the TEM images ( Figure 1A), and formed bundles. However, effective sonication before every use minimized the aggregation. The average diameter of the resulting SWCNTs−COOH was 1.1 nm, which was consistent with the diameter provided by the manufacturer ( Figure 1B). An impurity of 0.1% Ni was detected using EDS. FTIR was used to identify the -COOH functional group of the SWCNTs−COOH sample from our previous paper [21]. According to the results, the existence of C=O was observed to stretch at~1741 cm −1 while C-O stretched at~1200 cm −1 , which confirmed the presence of a carboxyl moiety. The length of this SWCNT sample was 1.1 ± 0.6 µm (mean ± standard deviation) according to our prior work [21].

Lethal Effects of SWCNTs−COOH
The lethality of age-synchronized L4 worms was investigated after exposure to SWCNTs−COOH samples that were serially diluted for 24 h. In comparison with the control group, there were no significantly lethal effects with any of the SWCNTs−COOH concentrations (0.001-1000 µg·L −1 ) (Figure 2A). Few studies have focused on the toxicity of SWCNTs−COOH in C. elegans. Treatment with pristine SWCNTs and the amide variant of functionalized SWCNTs (1.0, 100, 250, and 500 µg·mL −1 ) for 48 h was shown to have no significant difference in terms of lethal effects for C. elegans as compared with a control group [43]. In other in-vivo models, treatment with SWCNTs−COOH at concentrations of 1.0, 10, 50, 100, or 200 mg·L −1 for 72 h significantly reduced the survival of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos [47]. SWCNTs−COOH concentrations of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 mg kg −1 body weight induced hepatotoxicity in mice through activation of the oxidative stress mechanism [48]. Arndt et al. (2013) identified no significant lethal effects following the treatment of daphnids with 10 or 50 ppm SWCNTs−COOH for 48 h [22]. trol group, there were no significantly lethal effects with any of the SWCNTs−COOH concentrations (0.001-1000 μg·L −1 ) (Figure 2A). Few studies have focused on the toxicity of SWCNTs−COOH in C. elegans. Treatment with pristine SWCNTs and the amide variant of functionalized SWCNTs (1.0, 100, 250, and 500 μg·mL −1 ) for 48 h was shown to have no significant difference in terms of lethal effects for C. elegans as compared with a control group [43]. In other in-vivo models, treatment with SWCNTs−COOH at concentrations of 1.0, 10, 50, 100, or 200 mg·L −1 for 72 h significantly reduced the survival of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos [47]. SWCNTs−COOH concentrations of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 mg kg −1 body weight induced hepatotoxicity in mice through activation of the oxidative stress mechanism [48]. Arndt et al. (2013) identified no significant lethal effects following the treatment of daphnids with 10 or 50 ppm SWCNTs−COOH for 48 h [22].   Figure 2B). The lifespan of C. elegans was significantly reduced (75-63%) beginning at 8 days post ≥1 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH treatment as compared with the control group ( Figure 2C). Our result is similar to that of a previous study, indicating that treatment with 500 µg·mL −1 of amide-functionalized SWCNTs also resulted in a decreased lifespan for C. elegans (7.8 days vs. 14.3 days in the control) [43]. In contrast, cysteinefunctionalized SWCNTs had no significant effects on the lifespan of nematodes [44]. The amide-functionalized SWCNTs were efficiently taken up by C. elegans, causing toxic accumulation [43]. Regulation of the translocation and distribution of nanomaterials in both the primary and secondary targeted organs by a biological barrier may affect both the survival and lifespan of C. elegans [40]. Carboxyl modification prevented the toxicity of MWCNTs on primary and secondary target organs, but MWCNTs-COOH also persisted in primary target organs [41]. SWCNTs−COOH induced oxidative stress, triggered G2/M phase arrest, increased cell membrane damage, and eventually caused apoptosis [49]. Ad-ditionally, functionalized SWCNTs may decrease DAF-16 translocation to the nucleus, which would result in the suppression of the downstream signaling pathway, reducing the lifespan of C. elegans [43]. Taken together, these findings reveal that treatment with ≥1 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH for 8 days reduces the lifespan of C. elegans, an effect that was sustained for 24 days.
ide-functionalized SWCNTs were efficiently taken up by C. elegans, causing toxic accumulation [43]. Regulation of the translocation and distribution of nanomaterials in both the primary and secondary targeted organs by a biological barrier may affect both the survival and lifespan of C. elegans [40]. Carboxyl modification prevented the toxicity of MWCNTs on primary and secondary target organs, but MWCNTs-COOH also persisted in primary target organs [41]. SWCNTs−COOH induced oxidative stress, triggered G2/M phase arrest, increased cell membrane damage, and eventually caused apoptosis [49]. Additionally, functionalized SWCNTs may decrease DAF-16 translocation to the nucleus, which would result in the suppression of the downstream signaling pathway, reducing the lifespan of C. elegans [43]. Taken together, these findings reveal that treatment with ≥1 μg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH for 8 days reduces the lifespan of C. elegans, an effect that was sustained for 24 days.  To investigate the adverse effect of SWCNTs−COOH on growth, C. elegans was exposed to various concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH for 24 h, and then nematodes were transferred to new NGM plates without exposure to SWCNTs−COOH and incubated for 48 h until reaching the L4 stage. As shown in Figure 3A, body length in the control group was 1230 µm, and this was significantly decreased by 0.91-fold (1130 µm) compared with the control group following exposure to a concentration of 0.01 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH. The treatment group that was exposed to 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH showed the most negative effects. Body length decreased by 0.72-fold (961 µm) compared with the control group. Arndt et al. (2013) found that daphnids exposed to concentrations of 10 and 50 ppm were 7.9% and 17.7% smaller in size than the control group, respectively, and SWCNTs−COOH was shown to be more toxic than SWCNTs, SWCNTs-CONH 2 , and SWCNTs-PEG to the growth of daphnids [22]. Chen et al. (2013) also found a dose-dependent decrease in the body length of C. elegans with an increasing concentration of amide-functionalized SWCNTs after 48 h exposure. Furthermore, C. elegans was able to recover from amide-functionalized SWCNTsinduced growth retardation following exposure [43]. Nevertheless, SWCNTs−COOH was observed to retard the growth of C. elegans at higher concentrations, and the effect was not reversible even after termination of the exposure.

Effects of SWCNTs−COOH on the Intracellular ROS Generation and Localization of Nematodes
This study found that the lifespan of C. elegans was significantly reduced beginning at 8 days post ≥1 μg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH treatment ( Figure 2C). An investigation of adverse effects addressed the generation and distribution of ROS and the potential mechanisms that occur after exposure of the nematodes to SWCNTs−COOH. As shown in Figure  4, there was no significant effects concerning ROS generation after 8 days of exposure to SWCNTs−COOH at all concentrations, except for 1000 μg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH. In comparison with the control group, the immunofluorescence exam also found that exposure to 1000 μg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH increased ROS generation in the head, middle, and tail regions of C. elegans after 8 days ( Figure 5A,B).

Adverse Effect of SWCNTs−COOH on the Reproduction of C. elegans
To examine whether exposure to SWCNTs−COOH affected the reproduction of C. elegans, we assayed the brood size after exposure to different concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH ( Figure 3B). The result showed that exposure to 1-1000 µg·L −1 of SWCNTs−COOH significantly decreased the brood size of C. elegans compared with the control group. A total of 163 progenies were produced by the control group, a significant decrease of 0.47-fold (78 progenies) at a concentration of 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH compared with the control groups. This corroborates the possibility that a reduction in lifespan might be the resulting effect of penetration of the primary targeted organ ≥1 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH, thus affecting the reproductive organs of C. elegans which are classified as secondary targeted organs [40,41]. Daphnid reproduction was significantly decreased by 24.6% and 58.7% after chronic exposure to 10 and 50 ppm of SWCNTs−COOH nanomaterials, respectively. In addition, SWCNTs−COOH was found to be more toxic to daphnid reproduction than SWCNTs, SWCNTs-CONH 2 , and SWCNTs-PEG [22]. Similarly, exposure to 500 µg·mL −1 of amide-functionalized SWCNTs could cause a decrease in the daily brood size production of C. elegans with an average of 43 progenies in all exposed worms [43]. Male albino mice at the age of 7 weeks that underwent continuous exposure to SWCNTs−COOH at a concentration of 4 mg kg −1 body weight (b.w.)/twice a week for 5 weeks had decreased epididymis sperm counts, sperm motility, and sperm viability compared with those in a control group [50]. In contrast, long-term (250 µg·L −1 ) and short-term (50, 100, and 250 µg·L −1 ) exposure to cysteine-functionalized SWCNTs had no significant effects on the reproduction of C. elegans [44]. The SWCNTs−COOH also accelerated the hatching of zebrafish embryos after 72 h of exposure (acute exposure) [47]. Therefore, the toxicity of SWCNTs−COOH is related to the brood size of the exposed organism.

Effects of SWCNTs−COOH on the Locomotion Behavior of C. elegans
The present study used the head thrashing and body bending of C. elegans to assess the neurological toxicity effect based on various concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH ( Figure 3C,D). Exposure to ≥1 µg·L −1 of SWCNTs−COOH significantly decreased head thrashing in C. elegans compared with the control group. Compared with the control group (141.9 head thrashes per minute), head thrashing in C. elegans decreased by 23.93%, 29.43%, 40.71%, and 52.20% when the SWCNTs−COOH concentration was 1, 10, 100, and 1000 µg·L −1 , respectively ( Figure 3C). Similarly, SWCNTs−COOH significantly decreased body bending in C. elegans at concentrations above 0.1 µg·L −1 . When the SWCNTs−COOH concentration was 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 µg·L −1 , the body bending of C. elegans decreased by 24.13%, 23.46%, 27.16%, 34.57%, and 41.08%, respectively, compared with the control group (14.85 body bends per 20 s) ( Figure 3D). In contrast, cysteine-functionalized SWCNTs had no significant effects on the movement or other aberrant activities of nematodes [44]. Regarding the toxicity of MWCNT, PEGylated MWCNTs reduced the toxicity effect on the brood size and neurobehavioral activity of nematodes in comparison with pristine MWCNTs [40]. Nouara et al. (2013) found that nonfunctionalized-MWCNTs damaged the intestines of C. elegans at concentrations above 0.1 µg·L −1 and the functions of neurons and reproductive organs at concentrations above 0.001 µg·L −1 . However, MWCNTs-COOH had no significant effects on the primary and secondary targeted organs at concentrations of less than 100 µg·L −1 [41]. The neurons may be secondary targeted organs for CNT toxicants in C. elegans [40][41][42]. Locomotion behaviors, including head thrashing, body bending, basic movements, and locomotion rate, are relatively sensitive endpoints for neurotoxicity assessment in C. elegans. The combination of previous studies with our findings indicates that the surface functionalization of nanomaterials, such as SWCNTs, may affect the toxicity of C. elegans. The potential toxicity of SWCNTs−COOH can be attributed to the damaging effect of the nanomaterials on the reproductive organs and neurons of the nematodes, which may reduce longevity. However, the biological barrier of C. elegans may prevent the toxicity effect on secondary targeted organs at low SWCNTs−COOH concentrations.

Effects of SWCNTs−COOH on the Intracellular ROS Generation and Localization of Nematodes
This study found that the lifespan of C. elegans was significantly reduced beginning at 8 days post ≥1 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH treatment ( Figure 2C). An investigation of adverse effects addressed the generation and distribution of ROS and the potential mechanisms that occur after exposure of the nematodes to SWCNTs−COOH. As shown in Figure 4, there was no significant effects concerning ROS generation after 8 days of exposure to SWCNTs−COOH at all concentrations, except for 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH. In comparison with the control group, the immunofluorescence exam also found that exposure to 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH increased ROS generation in the head, middle, and tail regions of C. elegans after 8 days ( Figure 5A,B).

Upregulation of Antioxidant Gene Expression in SWCNTs−COOH-Treated Nematodes
To investigate the possible toxicity mechanism of SWCNTs−COOH, C. elegans was exposed to various concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH at the adult stage for 8 days, and then the expression of SOD-1, SOD-3, CTL-2, CYP-35A2, and mtl-2 mRNA was determined ( Figure 6). Real-time PCR analysis showed that exposure to 1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly increased SOD-1, SOD-3, and mtl-2 mRNA expression; 1 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly increased SOD-3 and CTL-2 mRNA expression; and 0.001 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly increased CYP-35A2 mRNA expression in C. elegans compared with the control group. SOD-1 encodes copper superoxide dismutase and SOD-3 encodes an iron/manganese superoxide dismutase that is localized in the cytosol and/or mitochondrial matrix, which might protect against oxidative stress, regulate the brood size, vulval development, and lifespan [51,52]. CTL-2 has catalase and peroxidase activity, which is required for antioxidant production, a normal lifespan, the egglaying capacity, and peroxisomal morphology. CYP-35A2 encodes cytochrome P450s and the NADPH-dependent monooxygenasesone of C. elegans, which metabolize endogenous compounds (e.g., fatty acids and lipid signaling molecules) and exogenous compounds (e.g., xenobiotic chemicals). In addition, mtl-2 plays roles in stress adaptation, homeostasis, and metal detoxification and might regulate the growth and fertility of C. elegans [51]. Our findings reveal that SWCNTs−COOH could trigger a protective response to oxidative damage by increasing the resistance to chronic oxidative stress. SWCNTs−COOH significantly induced ROS generation in THP-1 cells, as compared with the control group ( Figure 7B).  In our previous studies [36][37][38][39], the engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) of silica nanoparticles, including SiO 2 and NH 2 -SiO 2 , and graphene oxide as well as PM2.5 caused reproductive toxicity, a disruption of neurobehavior, and a shortened longevity for the nematodes. For the ambient PM2.5 level, both low levels of PM2.5 from rural areas and high levels of PM2.5 from heavy traffic emissions in urban areas induced the toxic effects on reproduction, delayed locomotion, and shortened the lifespan in wild-type C. elegans models [36,39]. In addition to PM2.5, ENMs were treated and tested in the worms. Based on the findings from our previous reports [37,38] and the present study, the carbon-based ENMs seem to cause greater toxicity than the silica-based ENMs. The carbon-based ENMs have been shown to cause toxic effects at low dosages, for example, graphene oxide at ppt levels [37] and SWCNTs−COOH at ppb levels (in the present study). This is compared with silicabased ENMs, which induce the toxicity of C. elegans at high doses, for example, SiO 2 and NH 2 -SiO 2 at 1000-fold ppm levels [38]. Graphene oxide nanoparticles at a dose of 0.001 µg·L −1 significantly induced oxidative stress (activated gene expression of SOD-1, SOD-3, and CTL-2) to a greater extent than an untreated control [37]. In the present study, SWCNTs−COOH was treated in C. elegans to activate the gene expression of SOD-3, CTL-2, and CYP-35A2. Next, we used human monocyte THP-1 cells to explore whether the findings observed in worms were conserved in vertebrates. THP-1 cells were exposed to various concentrations of SWCNTs−COOH for 48 h and the viability of THP-1 cells was measured by the Alamar Blue bioassay, as shown in Figure 7. In comparison with the control group, the SWCNTs−COOH sample concentrations (0.001-1000 µg·L −1 ) had no significant effects on the THP-1 cell viability ( Figure 7A). However, 6 h of exposure to 0.001-1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly induced ROS generation in THP-1 cells, as compared with the control group ( Figure 7B).

Alteration of Antioxidant Gene Expression in THP-1 Cells Following Treatment with SWCNTs−COOH
In addition to SOD and catalase, GPX is considered the classical antioxidant enzyme. Therefore, we investigated the mRNA expression of SOD, catalase, and GPX in THP-1 cells after exposure to 0.001-1 μg·L −1 of SWCNTs−COOH for 48 h. Real-time PCR analysis showed that treatment with SWCNTs−COOH significantly increased the mRNA expression of catalase, MnSOD, CuZnSOD, and SOD-2 in THP-1 cells compared with the control group ( Figure 8A-D). The results were similar to findings for C. elegans. However, treatment with 0.01-1000 μg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly decreased GPX-2 and GPX-3 mRNA expression in THP-1 cells compared with the control group ( Figure 8E,H). These findings reveal that a low concentration of SWCNTs−COOH might induce ROS generation and disrupt the protective response to oxidative damage in THP-1 cells. Ye et al. (2011) also demonstrated that a low concentration of SWCNTs−COOH (0.1 μg·L −1 ) accumulated mainly in the cytoplasm and was cytotoxic to human primary monocytes, causing increased cell membrane damage, triggering G2/M phase arrest, inducing an inflammatory response through oxidative stress and NF-κB activation, and eventually causing apoptosis [49]. Furthermore, background-level SWCNTs−COOH induced antioxidant

Alteration of Antioxidant Gene Expression in THP-1 Cells following Treatment with SWCNTs−COOH
In addition to SOD and catalase, GPX is considered the classical antioxidant enzyme. Therefore, we investigated the mRNA expression of SOD, catalase, and GPX in THP-1 cells after exposure to 0.001-1 µg·L −1 of SWCNTs−COOH for 48 h. Real-time PCR analysis showed that treatment with SWCNTs−COOH significantly increased the mRNA expression of catalase, MnSOD, CuZnSOD, and SOD-2 in THP-1 cells compared with the control group ( Figure 8A-D). The results were similar to findings for C. elegans. However, treatment with 0.01-1000 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH significantly decreased GPX-2 and GPX-3 mRNA expression in THP-1 cells compared with the control group ( Figure 8E,H). These findings reveal that a low concentration of SWCNTs−COOH might induce ROS generation and disrupt the protective response to oxidative damage in THP-1 cells. Ye et al. (2011) also demonstrated that a low concentration of SWCNTs−COOH (0.1 µg·L −1 ) accumu-lated mainly in the cytoplasm and was cytotoxic to human primary monocytes, causing increased cell membrane damage, triggering G2/M phase arrest, inducing an inflammatory response through oxidative stress and NF-κB activation, and eventually causing apoptosis [49]. Furthermore, background-level SWCNTs−COOH induced antioxidant gene expression in nematodes that was similar to high homologous gene expression with human cells, indicating that the effects produced by SWCNTs−COOH may be conserved across different species.

Conclusions
The present study revealed that exposure to a low dose of SWCNTs−COOH (0.001 or 1.00 µg·L −1 ) induced ROS generation and disrupted antioxidant gene expression in human monocytes THP-1 cells. Similar nanotoxic effects were also found in C. elegans, where treatment with 0.001 or 1.00 µg·L −1 SWCNTs−COOH disrupted the expression of antioxidant genes, including SOD-1, SOD-3, and ctl-2. SWCNTs−COOH (≥1 µg·L −1 ) was also associated with adverse effects on lifespan, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, and ROS generation in C. elegans. Our data, which was collected using invitro cultured THP-1 cells and an in-vivo C. elegans model, reveal that a background level of SWCNTs−COOH may exert nanomaterial toxicity. Further in-depth studies of the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of SWCNTs−COOH using mammalian animals and clinical trials are required.