Spatiotemporal Trends, Sources and Ecological Risks of Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediments of Weitou Bay, China

Heavy metals are extremely harmful materials to marine ecosystems and human health. To determine the anthropogenic contributions and ecological risks in Weitou Bay, China, the spatiotemporal variations in the concentrations of heavy metals in surface sediment were investigated during spring 2008 and 2017. The results indicated that high concentrations of pollutants were generally located near the river mouths and along the coast of industrial areas. Principal component analysis indicated that heavy metal contents were mainly affected by industrial waste drainage, urban development, natural weathering and erosion, and interactions between organic matter and sulfides. The potential ecological risk assessment demonstrated that, in 2008, 82% of the sampling sites were at low risk, while 18% were at moderate risk. The situation had deteriorated slightly by 2017, with 73%, 18%, and 9% of stations in Waytou Bay at low, moderate, and very high risk, respectively. Cd was the most harmful metal, followed by Hg. These two elements accounted for more than 80% of the potential ecological risk index (RI) value. The present work analyzed the source of heavy metals, identified the major pollution elements and high risk areas, and provides guidance for pollution control and ecological restoration in Weitou Bay.


Introduction
As regions of active land-sea interactions, coastal areas are considered to be sinks for various contaminants derived from natural source and anthropogenic activities [1]. Along with rapid economic growth in coastal regions, an increasing number of pollutants are discharged into the ocean, leading to serious environmental problems and potential threats to aquatic organisms and marine ecosystems [2,3].
Unlike some organic pollutants, heavy metals do not degrade easily. Due to their persistence, toxicity, bioaccumulation, and non−biodegradability, heavy metals have been acknowledged as extremely harmful materials to marine ecosystems and human health [4,5]. Owing to the effects of adsorption, flocculation, and subsidence, a considerable amount of heavy metal pollutants discharged into seawater are transferred to the sediment, while only a small part remains dissolved in the water [6]. Nevertheless, under complex physicochemical and dynamic conditions, heavy metals can be released from surface sediments into the seawater [7]. Therefore, sediment becomes not only a reservoir for heavy metals in the ocean, but also an indicator of contamination in the marine environment. To a certain extent, the distribution of heavy metals in sediments reflects the pollution level of the marine environment and is commonly used to determine the source(s) of the pollutants [8].
Studying the distributions and pollution status of heavy metals and their controlling mechanisms under the influence of anthropogenic activity provides a basis for pollution control and environmental protection.
Weitou Bay is located in Quanzhou City in Fujian Province, which is an important location of economic growth in southeastern China. From 2008 to 2017, the GDP in Quanzhou increased from 270.5 billion Chinese RMB (CNY) to 754.8 billion, and the

Study Area
Weitou Bay is a semi−enclosed bay located in southeastern Fujian Province, China, to the west of the Taiwan Strait (Figure 1), and is the beginning of the ancient Maritime Silk Road in China. The bay is characterized by regular semi−diurnal tides with an average tidal range of 4.19 m [14] and does not freeze, owing to the subtropical monsoon climate in the region. Weitou Bay is trumpet-shaped, with a narrow northern bay (inner bay) that extends inland. The inner bay has an 800 m mouth and is approximately 9 km long, 1.5 km wide, and covers 13.1 km 2 , of which 9.8 km 2 comprises intertidal flats [13]. The inner bay receives continuous inputs of land−based pollutants from the Daying, Xiadian, and Jiatang Rivers, and the seabed in this area has a high sedimentation rate [11].
The southern part of Weitou Bay (outer bay) has a relatively wider mouth and deeper water depths. The hydrodynamic conditions due to vertical and horizontal mixing gradually increase from the inner bay to the outer bay [8]. The outer bay is 12 km wide in the N-S direction and 22 km wide in the E-W direction, with an area of 279.9 km 2 , of which 58.1 km 2 is intertidal flats. Two deep grooves~15 m in depth are located in the middle of the outer bay [15,16].
Weitou Bay is influenced by human activity (sewage and industrial discharge, harbor activities, reclamation), which have increased its environmental risk, decreased the tidal volume, caused the water to become eutrophic, and resulted in huge amounts of pollutants, including heavy metals being deposited in the sediment. These factors all pose threats to aquatic organisms and the marine ecosystem in the bay [12,13,17].

Sampling and Analyses
Surface sediment (0-5 cm) samples were collected from Weitou Bay during the spring of 2008 and 2017 using a stainless−steel grab sampler ( Figure 1). The samples were then placed into sealed polyethylene bags and stored at 4 • C until analysis. Total organic carbon (TOC), sulfide, and heavy metal (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Hg, and As) concentrations were analyzed following standard Chinese marine monitoring methods (GB 17378.5−2007) [18]. The southern part of Weitou Bay (outer bay) has a relatively wider mouth and deeper water depths. The hydrodynamic conditions due to vertical and horizontal mixing gradually increase from the inner bay to the outer bay [8]. The outer bay is 12 km wide in the N-S direction and 22 km wide in the E-W direction, with an area of 279.9 km 2 , of which 58.1 km 2 is intertidal flats. Two deep grooves ~15 m in depth are located in the middle of the outer bay [15,16].
Weitou Bay is influenced by human activity (sewage and industrial discharge, harbor activities, reclamation), which have increased its environmental risk, decreased the tidal volume, caused the water to become eutrophic, and resulted in huge amounts of pollutants, including heavy metals being deposited in the sediment. These factors all pose threats to aquatic organisms and the marine ecosystem in the bay [12,13,17].

Sampling and Analyses
Surface sediment (0-5 cm) samples were collected from Weitou Bay during the spring of 2008 and 2017 using a stainless−steel grab sampler ( Figure 1). The samples were then placed into sealed polyethylene bags and stored at 4 °C until analysis. Total organic carbon (TOC), sulfide, and heavy metal (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Hg, and As) concentrations were analyzed following standard Chinese marine monitoring methods (GB 17378.5−2007) [18].
Prior to analysis, the samples were dried at 60 °C, ground to pass through a 160−mesh sieve, and fully mixed. To determine the contents of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, and Cr, 0.1 g of the dry samples was digested with a solution of HNO3+HClO4+HCl (6:2:1 by volume) in glass beakers on an electric hotplate for 2 h. The compositions and corresponding concentrations of the digested samples were then analyzed using atomic absorption spectrometry (Jenna Zeenit 6000). For the Hg and As analyses, 0.1 g of each sample was digested with chloroazotic acid (HNO3+HCl, 3:1 by volume) for 2 h, then analyzed using atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS−920). TOC concentrations were determined using Prior to analysis, the samples were dried at 60 • C, ground to pass through a 160−mesh sieve, and fully mixed. To determine the contents of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, and Cr, 0.1 g of the dry samples was digested with a solution of HNO 3 +HClO 4 +HCl (6:2:1 by volume) in glass beakers on an electric hotplate for 2 h. The compositions and corresponding concentrations of the digested samples were then analyzed using atomic absorption spectrometry (Jenna Zeenit 6000). For the Hg and As analyses, 0.1 g of each sample was digested with chloroazotic acid (HNO 3 +HCl, 3:1 by volume) for 2 h, then analyzed using atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS−920). TOC concentrations were determined using the potassium dichromate oxidation method [18]. Sulfide concentrations were analyzed using the iodine method [18].
For data quality control, standard reference materials (GBW07314, from the National Research Center for Certified Reference Materials, Beijing, China) were analyzed using the above method, and the recovery rates of the monitoring factors ranged from 95% to 110%. The determinations had a precision (represented by the average relative standard deviation (RSD) of parallel samples) of better than 5.0%. The quality control measurement results indicated that the determination accuracy met the requirements of this study (an average RSD of parallel samples less than 5%, and recovery rates of the monitoring factors between 90~110% [18]).

Potential Ecological Risk Assessment of Sediment
The potential ecological risk index (RI) was used to obtain a comprehensive assessment of ecological pressure from heavy metals. The RI was calculated using the following Equations [19]: where i, f, and m denote a specific metal i in the sediment sample, fraction, and total number of metals analyzed in the sediment sample, respectively. C i f is the contamination factor for an individual metal. C i is the concentration of metal i in the sample and C i n is the background value for metal i. In this study, the heavy metals concentrations in the coastal soil in Fujian Province served as the background values [20] (Table 1). E i r is the potential ecological risk factor for a single heavy metal. T i r is the toxicity factor for heavy metal i, representing its toxicity levels and the sensitivity towards bio-organisms. In this study, Hakanson's standard toxicity factors were adopted; the values for the toxicity factors of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Hg, and As are 5, 5, 1, 30, 2, 40, and 10, respectively [19,21]. Min, max, mean−whole are the minimum, maximum, and average concentrations of the entire Weitou Bay, respectively. Mean−inner and mean−outer are the average concentrations of the inner and outer Weitou Bay, respectively. SD and RSD are the standard deviation and relative standard deviation of the entire Weitou Bay, respectively. Background values are the concentrations of heavy metals in the coastal soils of Fujian Province. "/" indicates no available comparison data.

Statistical Analyses
The SPSS software package (version 20.0) was used to determine the Pearson correlation coefficients of all tested factors, and principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to explore the potential pollution sources (natural or artificial) and their elemental characteristics. PCA is commonly used to identify potential pollution sources, distinguish natural and anthropogenic contributions, and indicate biogeochemical processes related to heavy metals. In this study, principal components were performed based on the correlation matrix and extracted if their eigenvalues were greater than 1.0. We then used ArcGIS 10.0 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, inc.) with the Kriging spatial interpolation method to quantitatively determine the spatial distributions of the heavy metals.

Temporal Variations and Trends
The heavy metal concentrations in the Weitou Bay surface sediment are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2. For the seven heavy metals measured in the surface sediments, the mean concentrations of Cu and Zn decreased from 2008 to 2017, while the Cd, Pb, and As concentrations increased and the Hg and Cr concentrations did not vary significantly ( Figure 2a). Specifically, the mean concentrations and ranges of Cu and Zn decreased from 38. It can be judged from the RSD value (Table 1) that the difference in the spatial distribution of Cu was the most significant among the seven heavy metals, followed by Cd and Cr, while the difference in the spatial distribution of Pb, Zn, Hg, and As was relatively small. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 2, the mean concentrations of heavy metals in the outer bay were lower than those in the inner bay in 2008. In 2017, except for Pb and Cr, the averages of other elements were still lower than those in the inner bay. Overall, the outer bay was less polluted by heavy metals than the inner bay.
The 2008 average concentrations of Cu (38.7 mg•kg −1 ), Zn (118.6 mg•kg −1 ), and Cd (0.113 mg•kg −1 ) in the surface sediments of Weitou Bay were higher than the environ- It can be judged from the RSD value (Table 1) that the difference in the spatial distribution of Cu was the most significant among the seven heavy metals, followed by Cd and Cr, while the difference in the spatial distribution of Pb, Zn, Hg, and As was relatively small. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 2, the mean concentrations of heavy metals in the outer bay were lower than those in the inner bay in 2008. In 2017, except for Pb and Cr, the averages of other elements were still lower than those in the inner bay. Overall, the outer bay was less polluted by heavy metals than the inner bay.
The 2008 average concentrations of Cu (38.7 mg·kg −1 ), Zn (118.6 mg·kg −1 ), and Cd (0.113 mg·kg −1 ) in the surface sediments of Weitou Bay were higher than the environmental background values. However, since Cu (15.2 mg·kg −1 ) and Zn (62.9 mg·kg −1 ) decreased in 2017, only the mean Cd concentration (0.265 mg·kg −1 ) was higher than the environmental background value. In contrast, in both 2008 and 2017, the mean concentrations of the other heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Hg, and As) were below the environmental background values.

Spatial Distributions of Heavy Metals
The spatial distributions of heavy metal concentrations are shown in Figure 3. Concentrations of heavy metals in Weitou Bay are related to several factors and are indeed influenced by anthropogenic activity and hydrodynamic conditions. In 2008, the areas with high concentration of all heavy metals in sediment were located in inner Weitou Bay, and the spatial distribution exhibited a decreasing trend from north to south in the bay. In general, higher heavy metal concentrations in the inner bay are caused by large amounts of terrestrial pollution input by the three rivers flowing into the bay and sewage discharges from the coastal industrial zone. In addition, the weak hydrodynamic conditions in the inner bay prevent heavy metals from being diluted rapidly, resulting in their deposition in the sediment. Heavy metals discharged into the inner bay are partially deposited in sediments before they enter the outer bay with tidal currents. This could be one of the reasons why the mean heavy metal concentrations in the outer bay sediment were lower than those in the inner bay.
In 2017, two features of the spatial distribution of heavy metal concentrations were observed, including increasing concentrations in the outer bay and a shift of high concentration from the inner bay to the outer bay. High heavy metal concentrations were observed in the southeastern inshore area of the outer bay, where a new industrial center (including chemical fiber, printing and dyeing, electroplating, and other industries) was built after 2008. In contrast, except for Cd and As, heavy metal concentrations decreased in the inner bay. This improvement can be largely attributed to a series of remediation measures in the inner bay between 2008 and 2017, including upstream river regulation, sewage interception, and the closure of small polluting enterprises. For Cu and Zn, although the average concentrations decreased in both the inner and outer bay (Figure 2), higher concentrations were observed in the outer bay ( Figure 3). Pb, Cr, and Hg exhibited similar changes in spatial distribution from 2008 to 2017 (Figure 2), as the average concentrations of these heavy metals decreased in the inner bay but increased in the outer bay. For Cd and As, overall increases in their average concentrations occurred throughout the bay; however, the rate of increase in the outer bay was much higher than that of the inner bay ( Figure 2). From 2008 to 2017, the average Cd concentration increased by 136% (from 0.198 mg·kg −1 to 0.467 mg·kg −1 ) in the inner bay but increased by 249% (from 0.043 mg·kg −1 to 0.150 mg·kg −1 ) in the outer bay. Meanwhile, As increased by 12% in the inner bay and by 80% in the outer bay.

Heavy Metal Sources
Previous studies have indicated that heavy metals in surface sediment originate from various sources and could be primarily affected by three factors: (1) pollutant emissions from urban development and human activity; (2) adsorption and sequestration with organic matter and sulfide; and (3) natural weathering and erosion of rocks [23][24][25]. Therefore, correlation analysis and PCA were conducted to explore the relationships between the seven heavy metals, TOC, and sulfide in the surface sediment.
conditions in the inner bay prevent heavy metals from being diluted rapidly, resulti their deposition in the sediment. Heavy metals discharged into the inner bay are tially deposited in sediments before they enter the outer bay with tidal currents. could be one of the reasons why the mean heavy metal concentrations in the oute sediment were lower than those in the inner bay.  In 2017, two features of the spatial distribution of heavy metal concentrations observed, including increasing concentrations in the outer bay and a shift of high centration from the inner bay to the outer bay. High heavy metal concentrations observed in the southeastern inshore area of the outer bay, where a new industrial ter (including chemical fiber, printing and dyeing, electroplating, and other indus was built after 2008. In contrast, except for Cd and As, heavy metal concentration creased in the inner bay. This improvement can be largely attributed to a series of r diation measures in the inner bay between 2008 and 2017, including upstream river ulation, sewage interception, and the closure of small polluting enterprises. For Cu Zn, although the average concentrations decreased in both the inner and outer bay ure 2), higher concentrations were observed in the outer bay ( Figure 3). Pb, Cr, an exhibited similar changes in spatial distribution from 2008 to 2017 (Figure 2), as th erage concentrations of these heavy metals decreased in the inner bay but increas the outer bay. For Cd and As, overall increases in their average concentrations occu throughout the bay; however, the rate of increase in the outer bay was much higher that of the inner bay ( Figure 2). From 2008 to 2017, the average Cd concentratio creased by 136% (from 0.198 mg•kg −1 to 0.467 mg•kg −1 ) in the inner bay but increase 249% (from 0.043 mg•kg −1 to 0.150 mg•kg −1 ) in the outer bay. Meanwhile, As increase 12% in the inner bay and by 80% in the outer bay.

Heavy Metal Sources
Previous studies have indicated that heavy metals in surface sediment orig from various sources and could be primarily affected by three factors: (1) poll emissions from urban development and human activity; (2) adsorption and seque Before Pearson correlation analysis, the data were tested for normality. Only the data of five parameters (TOC, Pb, Zn, Hg, and As) had a normal distribution (p > 0.05). A log−transformation was applied to the other parameters (Sulfide, Cu, Cd, and Cr) to satisfy the conditions for the statistical tests. Statistically, these independent variables have mutual relationships, which is suitable for PCA, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.625 (>0.5) and a Bartlett's spherical test value of 0. Table 2 presents the results of the correlation analysis, indicating that Cu, Zn, Cr, Cd, and Hg have significant positive correlations with TOC, and that Cu, Cr, Cd, and Hg have significant positive correlations with sulfide. Chemical−specific surface adsorption, cation exchange reactions, and chelating reactions may play significant roles in the spatial distribution pattern of heavy metals in Weitou Bay. These reactions form metal organic complexes or precipitate metal sulfides, thereby promoting the migration of heavy metals from the water to the sediment. In a comparison of the ability of TOC and sulfides to control heavy metal distributions, Zn was more selectively absorbed by TOC than by sulfide. Moreover, Cu, Zn, and Hg had better correlations with TOC and sulfide. In contrast, Cr and Cd were more related to concentration by sulfide. There were significant correlations among Cu, Cd, and Cr. In addition, Cu, Zn and Hg had significant correlations, and there were remarkable correlations between As, Cd, and Hg. The relatively high correlations among the heavy metals indicate that they likely shared the same pollution source, geochemical behaviors, and mobility pathways, or at least shared one main origin.
The results of the PCA (Table 3) indicate that the first three principal components accounted for 81.727% of the total variance, which may play an important role in explaining the potential pollution source and other factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals. The first principal component (PC1) accounted for 49.936% of the total variance, exhibiting high positive loads from TOC (0.826), sulfide (0.821), Cu (0.832), Zn (0.700), Cd (0.769), Cr (0.697), Hg (0.773), and As (0.499). PC1 may reflect an anthropogenic origin, including industrial waste, agricultural source pollutants, and urban domestic sewage, which are the major contributors of heavy metals to marine sediments [12]. The spatial distributions of heavy metals in Weitou Bay indicate that the high concentration areas are located near the river mouth (inner bay) and along the coast of a concentrated industrial area, which is consistent with the large number of riverside or coastal industries, including printing and dyeing factories, tanneries, and electroplating factories. Wastewater from printing and dyeing factories contains a variety of heavy metal pollutants, including Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, and Hg. Moreover, Cr, Zn, and Cu are commonly used in electroplating, and Cr is the main heavy metal pollutant in tanning facilities. Fertilizers and pesticides used for agriculture are generally the main sources of As and Hg [26][27][28][29][30]. In addition, the contributions from TOC and sulfide in PC1 reached 0.826 and 0.821, respectively, which further supports a scenario where organic carbon and sulfide play important roles in metal ion complexing. The release of metal ions accompanied by organic matter degradation and the binding and fixation by sulfur ions are also important sources of heavy metals in sediments.  The second principal component (PC2) explained 17.483% of the variance, with high contributions from Pb (0.931) and Cr (0.583). In this case, atmospheric deposition and precipitation were also significant factors that contributed to the sources of Pb and Cr. Some studies have shown that urban transportation is the main source of Pb and Cr, since alloy materials used in car bodies and yellow paint on road surfaces contain high concentrations of Cr, and vehicle emissions contain considerable amounts of Pb [22,31]. Pb in the environment is mainly derived from fossil fuel combustion [7]. After it is released through industrial combustion and automobile exhaust, Pb enters the water through atmospheric deposition and rainfall. In addition, port shipping is another important source of Pb in Weitou Bay. According to data from the annual Quanzhou City Statistics Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development, there were 0.33 million vehicles in Quanzhou in 2008, with a total annual port capacity of 72.24 million tons and a total social electricity consumption of 26.9 billion kWh. By 2017, the number of vehicles reached 1.35 million, the annual port throughput was 129.86 million tons, and the total social power consumption was 47.0 billion kWh. These data indicate that the fossil fuel consumption in Quanzhou City increased from 2008 to 2017, which can lead to the doubling of Pb contents in the surface sediments of Weitou Bay, which is consistent with the data obtained in this study.
The third principal component (PC3) explained 14.308% of the variance, with the largest contribution from As, whose spatial variations were represented by relatively low RSDs among the studied metals. Moreover, the mean concentration of As was similar to the environmental background value. Based on the above analysis, PC3 indicates a natural source, such as rock weathering or erosion. In addition, the PC1 value was also highly correlated with As. From the results of the correlation analysis, As was significantly correlated with Hg, which indicates that As in the Weitou Bay surface sediment is affected by both human activity and natural processes.

Potential Ecological Risks of Heavy Metals
The results of the potential ecological risk assessment are summarized in Table 4   The individual element potential ecological risk indices indicate that, in Weitou Bay, the E i r values of most of the heavy metals were less than 40, reflecting an overall low ecological risk status, except for Cd. The E i r contribution rates to the RI by Cd in 2008 and 2017 were 57.6% and 78.5%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the other heavy metals. The maximum E i r value for Cd increased from 182.9 (2008) to 561.9 (2017), indicating that the potential ecological risk for Cd increased from 'very high' to 'disastrous'.
The spatial distribution of RI values generally decreased from north to south due to the intense industrial and other human activities located along the coast of the inner bay ( Figure 4). Even with 10 years of economic development, the RI only increased significantly in the inner bay. In 2008, 18% of the sampling sites had moderate ecological risks (mostly in the inner bay), while the others had low ecological risks. The situation was worse in 2017, with 18% of the sampling sites having moderate ecological risks and 9% having very high ecological risks due to Cd pollution. As shown in Table 3, PC1 (49.936% of the total variance) had a high contribution from Cd (0.769), indicating that anthropogenic origins are the major source of Cd pollution. Since there are many factories that emit heavy metal pollutants, reducing industrial pollution should attract special attention for mitigating pollution and increasing ecological restoration in Weitou Bay.

Conclusions
Based on the concentrations of TOC, sulfides, and heavy metals in the surface sediment samples collected from Weitou Bay in 2008 and 2017, we analyzed the spatiotemporal variations in heavy metal contents in the surface sediment and further assessed the pollution sources and potential ecological risks. High concentrations of pollutants were generally located near the river mouths (inner bay) and along the coast of the industrial area and shifted from the inner bay to the outer bay from 2008 to 2017. This indicates that heavy metals are associated with anthropogenic activity and hydrodynamic conditions in the bay. The average heavy metal concentrations were lower than their background values, except those of Cu, Zn, and Cd in 2008 and that of Cd in 2017.
Multivariate analyses indicate that Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, and Hg were mainly derived from industrial pollution, Pb predominantly originated from traffic emissions and industrial combustion, and agricultural activity and natural processes were the major sources of As. Moreover, physicochemical interactions with organic matter and sulfide may play significant roles in the distribution of heavy metals in Weitou Bay.
In general, Weitou Bay suffers from low to moderate heavy metal ecological risk, except for a small region that suffers from very high risk. From 2008 to 2017, the potential ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface sediments increased in the inner of Weitou Bay, which should be treated as the prior ecological protection areas. Cd was a large contributor (57.6% and 78.5% in 2008 and 2017, respectively) to the RI, and was the most serious of the polluting metals in the 2017 sediment samples, followed by Hg.
Long−term heavy metal monitoring, particularly of Cd and Hg, should be conducted to obtain real−time tracking of potential ecological risks in this region. Controlling industrial effluent discharge is the most effective measure for improving the marine environment. Overall, this study provides important guidance for pollution control measures and ecological restoration in Weitou Bay.

Conclusions
Based on the concentrations of TOC, sulfides, and heavy metals in the surface sediment samples collected from Weitou Bay in 2008 and 2017, we analyzed the spatiotemporal variations in heavy metal contents in the surface sediment and further assessed the pollution sources and potential ecological risks. High concentrations of pollutants were generally located near the river mouths (inner bay) and along the coast of the industrial area and shifted from the inner bay to the outer bay from 2008 to 2017. This indicates that heavy metals are associated with anthropogenic activity and hydrodynamic conditions in the bay. The average heavy metal concentrations were lower than their background values, except those of Cu, Zn, and Cd in 2008 and that of Cd in 2017.
Multivariate analyses indicate that Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, and Hg were mainly derived from industrial pollution, Pb predominantly originated from traffic emissions and industrial combustion, and agricultural activity and natural processes were the major sources of As. Moreover, physicochemical interactions with organic matter and sulfide may play significant roles in the distribution of heavy metals in Weitou Bay.
In general, Weitou Bay suffers from low to moderate heavy metal ecological risk, except for a small region that suffers from very high risk. From 2008 to 2017, the potential ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface sediments increased in the inner of Weitou Bay, which should be treated as the prior ecological protection areas. Cd was a large contributor (57.6% and 78.5% in 2008 and 2017, respectively) to the RI, and was the most serious of the polluting metals in the 2017 sediment samples, followed by Hg.
Long−term heavy metal monitoring, particularly of Cd and Hg, should be conducted to obtain real−time tracking of potential ecological risks in this region. Controlling industrial effluent discharge is the most effective measure for improving the marine environment. Overall, this study provides important guidance for pollution control measures and ecological restoration in Weitou Bay.