Next Article in Journal
Degradation of Tetracyclines in Pig Manure by Composting with Rice Straw
Previous Article in Journal
Heavy Metals in Surface Soils in the Upper Reaches of the Heihe River, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph13030248
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Importance of Macrophyte Quality in Determining Life-History Traits of the Apple Snails Pomacea canaliculata: Implications for Bottom-Up Management of an Invasive Herbivorous Pest in Constructed Wetlands

by
Rita S. W. Yam
*,
Yen-Tzu Fan
and
Tzu-Ting Wang
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(3), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030248
Submission received: 21 January 2016 / Revised: 16 February 2016 / Accepted: 16 February 2016 / Published: 24 February 2016
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pomacea canaliculata (Ampullariidae) has extensively invaded most Asian constructed wetlands and its massive herbivory of macrophytes has become a major cause of ecosystem dysfunctioning of these restored habitats. We conducted non-choice laboratory feeding experiments of P. canaliculata using five common macrophyte species in constructed wetlands including Ipomoea aquatica, Commelina communis, Nymphoides coreana, Acorus calamus and Phragmites australis. Effects of macrophytes on snail feeding, growth and fecundity responses were evaluated. Results indicated that P. canaliculata reared on Ipomoea had the highest feeding and growth rates with highest reproductive output, but all individuals fed with Phragmites showed lowest feeding rates and little growth with poorest reproductive output. Plant N and P contents were important for enhancing palatability, supporting growth and offspring quantity of P. canaliculata, whilst toughness, cellulose and phenolics had critically deterrent effects on various life-history traits. Although snail offspring quality was generally consistent regardless of maternal feeding conditions, the reduced growth and offspring quantity of the poorly-fed snails in constructed wetlands dominated by the less-palatable macrophytes could limit the invasive success of P. canaliculata. Effective bottom-up control of P. canaliculata in constructed wetlands should involve selective planting strategy using macrophytes with low nutrient and high toughness, cellulose and phenolic contents.

1. Introduction

Constructed wetlands are engineered systems extensively established worldwide in recent decades as the mitigation and restoration measures for the lost and degraded natural wetlands due to human activities. They are designed and built to mimic multiple natural processes serving for various purposes including wastewater treatment, support of biodiversity and biomass production, flood retention, aesthetic enhancement for landscape, space provision for public recreation and environmental education [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, constructed wetlands are highly susceptible to invasion and dominance of competitive-superior invasive species due to their relatively low ecosystem structural complexity related to short establishment time and intensive human disturbances [7]. This has caused serious threats to the restoration success of constructed wetlands by hampering many important ecosystem functions provided by the local biological assemblages, e.g., [8,9,10,11].
The apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae), which is native from South and Central America, has been identified as one of the 100 worst invaders worldwide and caused numerous impacts on the invaded wetlands in particular the Asian region for >40 years [8,12,13,14,15]. The fast growth, iteroparous reproduction, high fecundity and lack of effective predators and competitors of this gonochoristic gastropod have clearly contributed to its invasion success and strong competitiveness in most Asian wetlands [15,16,17,18]. The abilities of amphibious respiration and tolerance to water pollution further facilitate its superior adaptation in the eutrophic and hypoxic environment of constructed wetlands. Recent studies have confirmed the strong capability of the macrophytophagous P. canaliculata for reducing macrophyte biomass [17,19,20]. In fact, macrophytes represent one of the indispensable components of constructed wetlands due to not only their important properties associated with wastewater treatment processes (such as physical filtration, erosion control, provision of surface area for microbial colonisation, nutrient uptake and oxygen release), but also their functions as habitat provision for wildlife, support of primary productivity, regulation of nutrient cycling, and aesthetic enhancement [1,4,5,6,21]. Therefore, the macrophyte herbivory of P. canaliculata could result in serious impacts on many ecosystem functions such as lowering water purification effectiveness, altering nutrient cycling and decreasing availability of habitat and food sources to other species in constructed wetlands.
Conventional physical and chemical techniques have been widely used to eliminate P. canaliculata from the invaded wetlands, e.g., [22,23,24]. But, these methods did not provide any sustainable solution to control this snail and exhibited little control effectiveness despite the high operation cost involved. Recently, biological control has been considered as the more preferable management strategy for P. canaliculata in wetland ecosystems. However, this has only been limited to the top-down approach by introducing snail predators, such as common carp (Cyprinus carpio), and mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos), to regulate the field populations of P. canaliculata [25,26,27]. Due to the non-selective feeding habit of these snail predators, the non-target flora and fauna could be inevitably damaged resulting in further negative impacts to ecosystems functions.
On the contrary, the bottom-up approach of biological pest control involves alterations of the abundance of the targeted species by changing the abundance of food and habitat availability [28,29]. So far, bottom-up control on the apple snails in wetland ecosystems has received little attention [30] despite that an early study unintentionally discovered that regular habitat disturbance by crop rotation was an effective measure of reducing the density of P. canaliculata in paddy fields from Japan [31]. Recent laboratory investigations on feeding preference of the apple snails have revealed that the macrophyte palatability was highly linked to plant chemistry and physical structure [16,30,32,33,34]. These findings provided important details on the general influence of macrophyte characteristics on the snail herbivory and life-history traits. However, the characteristics of macrophytes grown in constructed wetlands could be strongly affected by the elevated levels of nutrients and pollutants from the wastewater input [35,36]; their influence on the feeding and life-history traits of P. canaliculata could be different from those plants inhabiting in natural wetlands or paddy fields [30,32,33]. Therefore, it would be essential to understand which macrophyte species or what plant characteristics contribute to the low palatability and poor support to the feeding and life-history traits of P. canaliculata in constructed wetlands. Although the current selection basis for macrophyte species planted in constructed wetlands is primarily based on their capability of nutrient retention and tolerance to adverse conditions in local environment, it would be important to incorporate the bottom-up control of the apple snails into the macrophyte planting design for constructed wetlands. Yet, the scientific knowledge necessary for devising the bottom-up control techniques of P. canaliculata has remained unclear.
Constructed wetlands have been widely established in Taiwan since the late 1990s. About 100 major constructed wetlands are built on river floodplains. Due to the rapid economic development and urbanization, these constructed wetlands serve the primary functions as mitigation sites for the lost and degraded natural wetlands, economical systems for municipal wastewater treatment and habitat provision for wildlife. Moreover, as influenced by the subtropical climate, heavy rainfall associated with monsoons and typhoons commonly occurs during summer (April to September) in Taiwan. Constructed wetlands also play important roles on flood abatement. However, the impact of intensive herbivory from the dominant pest P. canaliculata has seriously damaged the restored macrophytes, hampered the associated ecosystem functions and restoration success of the constructed wetlands [11,37]. Thus, there is a pressing need to devise appropriate control measures of P. canaliculata in the constructed wetlands. In this study, we quantified the palatability to P. canaliculata of five common macrophyte species from constructed wetlands in Taiwan based on their feeding rates in the non-choice laboratory feeding experiment. Also, the snail growth and fecundity performance were compared among the five macrophyte feeding treatments. Finally, the physical and chemical characteristics of the five study macrophyte species were analysed to evaluate their influence on the life-history traits of P. canaliculata. Our results would provide important knowledge for the selective criteria of macrophyte species suitable for planting in constructed wetlands to control the invasive P. canaliculata and reduce its herbivory impact by the bottom-up management approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Collection of Snails and Macrophyte Leaves

Sampling of experimental individuals of Pomacea canaliculata was undertaken in Daniaopin Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland, New Taipei City, N. Taiwan (121°26’–42’E, 24°59’–98’N; 38 ha), during August–September 2012. Climate in N. Taiwan is subtropical with hot summer from April to September and cold winter from October to March. The apple snails are commonly seen in constructed wetlands during summer. We collected 500 individuals of P. canaliculata in the present study including 100 individuals with random shell heights (SH; vertical distance from the apex to the aperture) for establishing the regression relationship between snail biomass and different morphological parameters, 300 individuals with SH between 20–25 mm for the growth experiment, and 100 individuals with SH > 25 mm for the fecundity experiment. As P. canaliculata is an invasive pest, field collection was not restricted by any legislation. The animal protocols used in this work were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of National Taiwan University (Approval no. 98–40). They are in accordance with the guidelines of Aquatic Invertebrate Handling by IACUC and Article 15–17 of Chapter 3 Scientific Application of Animals from the Animal Protection Law (Law no. 10400014321).
In this study, five macrophyte species in constructed wetlands, including Ipomoea aquatica Forsk. (Convolvulaceae), Commelina communis L. (Commelinaceae), Nymphoides coreana (H. Lev.) (Menyanthaceae), Acorus calamus L. (Acoraceae) and Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex Steud. (Poaceae), were used as five feeding treatments for the snail growth and fecundity experiments (Table 1). All five study macrophytes showed consistent dominance in most constructed wetlands in Taiwan. Ipomoea, Nymphoides, Acorus and Phragmites were commonly planted species, but Commelina was a widespread weed in our sampling site and other constructed wetlands. Only newly-grown leaves from adults plants (not seedlings) of all five macrophyte species were used for the snail growth and fecundity experiments to avoid the confounding effect of snail feeding preferences due to plant ages. Also, fresh macrophyte leaves were collected from the sampling site every 2 days during the experimental period to avoid any confounding effect on feeding preference because of variation in plant freshness. In the laboratory, all leaves were gently washed with deionised water and blotted dry, their standard weight was measured to 50 ± 0.1 g, and they were then stored at 7 °C for use in the snail growth and fecundity experiments. Leaves used for chemical analysis were dried at 50 °C to constant weight (±0.01 g), homogenized (particle size ≈ 0.5 mm) and stored in a desiccator prior to the analysis.

2.2. Regression between Snail Biomass and Different Morphological Parameters

In addition to SH, dry mass (DM) of snails were used to represent snail biomass as the growth indicators in this study. As the shells of freshwater snails consist of >95% inorganic carbon, i.e., calcium carbonate [38], shells were excluded for the measurement of DM of snails. Since these measurements involved killing the animals, obtaining snail DM during the growth experiment was not possible. In the laboratory, three morphological parameters including SH (±0.01 mm), wet weight (WW; ±0.01 g) and aperture width (AW; ±0.01 mm) were measured for the 100 snails with random SH (1.0–60.0 mm) collected from the sampling site. The snails were killed by refrigeration. Each snail was dissected, and the muscular body mass was separated from the shell. The WW was measured for both the shell and soft body. DM was recorded after oven-drying at 60 °C to constant weight (~72 h). Simple linear regressions were established between snail biomass and the three morphological parameters, including DM–AW, DM–SH, DM–WW, prior to the snail growth experiment. Results showed that log SH could explain the highest variability in the log DM of snails (log DM = 3.1631 log SH = 1.7418; r2 = 0.95; p < 0.001). Therefore, SH of the apple snails were measured during the growth experiment and used as the non-destructive morphological indicator for DM conversion.

2.3. Experiment 1: Snail Feeding and Growth Responses

Snail feeding and growth responses towards the five study macrophytes was tested by presenting leaves of each macrophyte to snails in the non-choice experiments. Prior to the experiment, all experimental snails were first acclimated with no food in laboratory aquaria containing aerated tap water at 25 ± 1 °C for 24 h, and individuals with obvious injuries were excluded. Six replicates of experimental chambers (size = 30 × 20 × 20 cm; water depth = 5 cm) were used for each macrophyte feeding treatment, and each chamber contained nine snails (20–25 mm SH) and 50 g of fresh leaves. Also, three replicates of control for each study macrophyte were set up with no snails. The snails were reared at 25 ± 1 °C and a photoperiod of 12-h light:12-h dark. Every two days, fresh macrophyte leaves and water were renewed, and any faeces of snails were removed in each experimental chamber. The remaining leaves in each experimental chamber were oven-dried at 50 °C to constant weight and their DM were measured (±0.01 g). Snail feeding rate (g·g−1·d−1) was calculated with respect to the snail DM (determined from the SH-DM regression above) per day. The SH of each snail was measured every 6 days. At the end of the 60-day experimental period, the final SH and DM of each snail were determined. The snail growth rate from each experimental chamber was calculated in terms of SH (SH-growth; mm·d−1) and DM (DM-growth; mg·d−1).

2.4. Experiment 2: Snail Fecundity Performance

The snail fecundity performance upon feeding with each of the five study macrophytes was investigated by placing one adult male and one adult female snail (SH > 2.5 cm) in the experimental chamber. Sex determination of adult P. canaliculata followed the method in [39]. Each macrophyte species was tested in six replicates of experimental chambers. All conditions were maintained identical to those of Experiment 1. All experimental chambers were checked every day, any egg clutch laid was removed immediately. However, any egg laid by snails during the first six days of the experiment was excluded to avoid the confounding effect on snail fecundity performance due to the fertilized eggs produced before the experiment. Then, each egg clutch produced by snails was carefully transferred onto the surface of a plastic board tilted in a separate tank with 5-cm water depth and maintained at 25 ± 1 °C. The snail fecundity performance upon different feeding treatments was determined based on the female reproductive output (i.e., quantity of potential offspring) that was evaluated by the number of clutches and clutch size (number of eggs per clutch) produced per female snails; and the quality of offspring that was assessed by the egg hatching success (%) and biomass of individual egg (DM-egg; mg) and neonate (DM-neonate; mg) to the nearest 0.1 mg. This experiment was conducted for 60 days, but snail fecundity performance upon different feeding treatments was assessed for a 54-day period (without the consideration of the first six days). After the experiment, all parent snails were dissected for confirmation of their sexes.

2.5. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Macrophytes

In this study, six physical and chemical characteristics were analysed for the leaves of Ipomoea, Commelina, Nymphoides, Acorus and Phragmites to evaluate their influence on feeding rate, growth and fecundity responses of P. canaliculata. The nutrient levels of leaves were indicated by the contents of total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P). The levels of defensive chemicals of leaves were assessed based on the content of total phenolics. The physical resistance of leaves to herbivory was examined according to the contents of lignin and cellulose, and the physical toughness. For each study macrophyte species, three replicate samples were analysed for individual physical and chemical characteristics. The combined method for N and P determination was used to analyse each leaf sample following the Kjeldahl-N method [40]. A 5 mg (±0.1 mg) homogenized leaf sample was placed in 25 mL of distilled water followed by the addition of 1 mL 98% H2SO4 with 0.2 mL CuSO4 (10%) in an Erlenmeyer flask. The sample was pre-digested at 100 °C for 1 h and then at 375 °C for 2 h using the micro-Kjeldahl apparatus. After cooling, NaOH was added to the digestate until the pH fell between 5–6, and pH could not exceed 6 to avoid any precipitation of dissolved phosphorus. The digestate was filtered through the GF/C filter (Whatman® Glass microfibre filter, Grade GF/C) and the volume was made up to 100 mL. The N and P concentrations were determined by the indophenol- and ascorbic-acid-methods respectively [41].
For measurement of the total phenolic content, the homogenized leaf sample (200 mg) was extracted with 10 mL 70% acetone (v/v) for 1 h at 4 °C and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10–20 min. The total phenolic content was measured with Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent, with ferulic acid as standard, according to [42]. An 0.5 mL portion of the supernatant from the centrifuged solution was made up to 1.0 mL with distilled water, and reacted with 5 mL Na2CO3 (2%) in NaOH (0.1 N) and 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent. The solution was allowed for 120-min incubation, and absorbance at 720 nm was measured by a spectrophotometer.
The Cellulose content of each leaf sample was evaluated according to [43] with modifications. A 250-mg of homogenized leaf sample was suspended in 20 mL of acid detergent solution (0.5 M H2SO4 and 20 g·L−1 CTAB) with 0.4 ml Decahydronaphtalene, and digested at 100 °C for 1 h. After cooling, the solution was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min. The pellet material, i.e., acid-detergent-fibre (ADF), was collected, washed in 30 mL hot distilled water (90–100 °C) and re-centrifuged until the pH of supernatant >6. Then, the pellet was washed with acetone, centrifuged, oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 h and weighed after cooling in a desiccator for 1 h. The ADF was comprised of lignin, cellulose and some ashes. The ADF was hydrolysed by adding 72% H2SO4 in small portions several times at 20–23 °C water bath with constant stirring for 3 h. The solution was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min. The pellet was collected, washed in 30 mL hot distilled water until free from acid, oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 h and weighed after cooling in a desiccator for 1 h. This dried sample was then ashed at 550 °C for 3 h. The cellulose content was determined by weight loss due to acid-detergent treatment whereas the lignin content was evaluated by weight loss due to ashing after acid-detergent treatment. All chemical contents, including N, P, phenolics, lignin and cellulose, of study leaf species were expressed as percentage with respect to the dry weight of leaf sample.
The physical toughness of fresh leaves of the five study macrophyte species were determined using a tearing device described in [44]. The leaf toughness was measured as the resistance to tearing. The fresh leaf sample was cut into disc (~10-mm diameter) which was secured between two pegs with one fixed to a ring stand by a clamp and another connected to a cup via a string passing through a pulley. Sand was gradually added to the cup until the accumulated weight tore apart the leaf disc. The combined weight of cup and sand was recorded as the leaf toughness (±0.01 g).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The snail consumption and SH-growth on each of the five study macrophyte species during the study period were compared using one-way ANOVA. The feeding rates, growth rates (SH-growth and DM-growth), and fecundity performance (clutch size, number of clutches produced per female, DM-egg, egg hatching success and DM-neonate) of P. canaliculata were compared among the feeding treatments of five macrophyte species using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests. The difference in physical and chemical characteristics among the five study macrophytes were also determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Pearson correlation was conducted to evaluate the association between macrophyte characteristics. As variations in the feeding, growth and fecundity responses of P. canaliculata were generally poorly explained by single macrophyte characteristic, best subset regression was performed to search for the subset of the most influential plant characteristics explaining the highest variability (with the lowest Mallows’ Cp statistic) of the snail feeding, growth and fecundity responses. Statistical analyses were carried out using Minitab 16.0 and SPSS 16 packages.

3. Results

3.1. Snail Feeding and Growth Responses

Pomacea canaliculata demonstrated significant consumption of all study macrophyte species (p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Table 2). Snails showed the highest mean percentage consumption of Ipomoea (57.18% ± 27.25%) whereas the lowest consumption of Acorus (2.66% ± 1.07%) and Phragmites (1.33% ± 0.79%) during the experiment. Their feeding rates also varied significantly among the five feeding treatments (F = 1560.84, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1a). Highest palatability to snails was exhibited by Ipomoea but lowest by Acorus and Phragmites as Ipomoea supported the highest snail feeding rates (0.439 ± 0.015 g·g−1·d−1) and it was approximately 37× and 19× that for Phragmites and Acorus respectively (Tukey test: Ipomoea > Nymphoides > Commelina > Acorus = Phragmites; p < 0.001).
Results of one-way ANOVA showed significant difference in SH-growth of P. canaliculata among the five macrophyte treatments (F = 37.14, p < 0.001; Figure 1b). In fact, only the feeding treatments of Ipomoea, Commelina and Nymphoides supported significant SH-growth (p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Table 2). In contrast, SH increment was not detected for the snails reared on Acorus and Phragmites throughout the experimental period. Highest SH-growth was exhibited by the snails fed with Ipomoea (0.104 ± 0.029 mm·d−1) and it was >10× higher than the individuals reared on Acorus and Phragmites (Ipomoea > Commelina = Nymphoides > Acorus = Phragmites; Tukey test; p < 0.001; Figure 1b). In this study, a similar trend was seen between snail SH-growth and DM-growth among the five feeding treatments (F = 17.03, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1c). The DM-growth of P. canaliculata was highest for Ipomoea (3.377 ± 0.540 mg·d−1), and it was ~40% higher than that of snails fed with Commelina and Nymphoides, and double that of individuals reared on Acorus and Phragmites.

3.2. Snail Fecundity Performance

Both the number of clutches produced per female (F = 4.15, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1d) and the clutch size (F = 5.94, p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1e) showed consistent variation among the five feeding treatments (Ipomoea ≥ Commelina = Nymphoides ≥ Acorus = Phragmites; Tukey test; p < 0.05) during the 54-day period for actual assessment of snail fecundity performance (noted that any egg laid by snails in the first six days before this 54-day period was excluded). The females fed with Ipomoea produced two to seven egg clutches during the 54-day experimental period such that one clutch was generally produced per one to two weeks. The snails reared on Commelina and Nymphoides produced one to five clutches during the experimental period, and thus one clutch was laid per two to three weeks. In contrast, the experimental individuals fed with Phragmites and Acorus only produced an average of 0.5–1 egg clutch during the first two weeks of the experiment. As similar to the growth response, Ipomoea supported the highest reproduction output of female P. canaliculata. The mean number of clutches produced by the females fed with Ipomoea was 4.33 ± 2.42, and their mean clutch size was 220.14 ± 83.64 eggs. The snails fed with Commelina and Nymphoides exhibited similar clutch characteristics such that their number of clutch per female snail and clutch size were 30%–50% less than the individuals reared on Ipomoea. Females reared on Phragmites and Acorus produced the lowest mean number of clutches and clutch size which were 70%–90% less than that produced from Ipomoea treatment. Also, about half of the female snails from the Phragmites and Acorus treatments did not produce any egg clutch during the study period.
The three attributes for offspring quality were highly consistent regardless the maternal feeding conditions in different macrophyte treatments except that significant lower hatching success of the eggs produced by the female snails fed with Phragmites (8.85% ± 7.11%) as compared to the other four macrophyte treatments (F = 5.47, p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1g). The females reared on Ipomoea, Commelina, Nymphoides and Acorus produced eggs with similar hatching success which were varied between 43.02%–53.9% (Ipomoea = Commelina = Nymphoides = Acorus > Phragmites; Tukey test; p < 0.01). Moreover, no significant difference was revealed in both DM-egg (range = 8.55–9.32 mg) and DM-neonate (range = 6.18–7.90 mg) produced by females among the five feeding treatments (F = 0.26, p > 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1f,h).

3.3. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Macrophytes

The five study macrophyte species revealed significant variation in their physical and chemical characteristics (Table 1). Ipomoea, Commelina and Nymphoides were generally higher in nutrient contents (N and P) but lower in physical (toughness, cellulose, lignin) and chemical defensive characteristics (phenolics), whilst Acorus and Phragmites showed the opposite patterns. Ipomoea and Commelina exhibited the highest N and P content ranging from 3.11%–5.01% and 0.48%–0.86% respectively, whereas Acorus and Phragmites showed the lowest nutrient contents. Highest contents of phenolics were measured for Acorus and Nymphoides (2.51%–3.17%), but lowest level was determined for Phragmites (0.29%–0.31%). Phragmites had the highest toughness with highest cellulose and lignin contents (toughness = 192.14–271.88 g; cellulose = 20.17%–24.53%; lignin = 6.15%–7.36%) among all study plants. In addition, our results showed significantly positive correlation between N and P of the macrophyte leaves (r = 0.831; Table 3). The nutrient contents were negatively correlated to most defensive characteristics. N was negatively correlated to all defensive characteristics (r = −0.39 to −0.72) whereas P was only negatively correlated to the physical defensive characteristics (r = −0.42 to −0.71). Both plant cellulose and lignin contents were positively correlated with toughness (r ≥ 0.55) but there was no significant correlation between cellulose and lignin.

3.4. Influence of Macrophyte Characteristics on Snail Life-History Traits

According to the best subset regression model, snail feeding rate was best predicted by positive association with P content and negative association with phenolics and cellulose (Adj. R2 = 0.78; Table 4). The models of the two snail growth attributes were similar, both SH-growth and DM-growth were highly explained by positive association with P and negative association with cellulose and toughness. However, influences of the macrophyte characteristics on the five attributes for fecundity performance were less consistent. Both the number of clutches per female snail and clutch size were best explained by positive association with N and negative association with phenolics and cellulose. The egg hatching success was significantly predicted by negative association with phenolic and cellulose contents. However, snail DM-egg and DM-neonate could not be explained by any measured macrophyte characteristics in this study as none of these variables were selected as predictor in the model. Results indicated that the adjusted R2 values were higher for the snail feeding and growth responses (adjusted R2 = 0.76–0.84), but lower for the fecundity attributes (adjusted R2 = 0.30–0.60).

4. Discussion

4.1. Snail Feeding and Growth Performance

The present non-choice feeding experiments revealed that Pomacea canaliculata exhibited different feeding rates on the five common macrophytes in constructed wetlands and their life-history traits varied greatly upon feeding with different plants. The apple snails reared on Ipomoea had the highest feeding and growth rates with highest reproductive output, but all individuals fed with Acorus and Phragmites showed lowest feeding rates and little growth with poorest offspring quantity. It was difficult to determine if the variation in snail growth and fecundity responses resulted from different feeding rates or plant characteristics. However, when the snail responses were compared between the feeding treatments of Nymphoides and Commelina, it was obvious that their growth and clutch production patterns were highly similar though snail feeding rate on Commelina was only half of that on Nymphoides. This suggested that feeding rates of P. canaliculata did not necessarily associate with growth rates and fecundity performance. Instead, macrophyte characteristics would be more important determinants for the snail growth and fecundity. Previous findings indicated that plant protein contents could play important roles on the fitness of invertebrate herbivores including snails, insects and crustaceans (i.e., survival, growth and reproduction) and thus they had strong N- and P-dependence from plants for protein synthesis [45,46]. Several studies on Pomacea spp. confirmed that macrophyte N and P contents were consistently important for supporting their feeding and growth [16,20,30,32]. However, only macrophyte P content was selected out of the two nutrient characteristics as the key determinant for feeding and growth rates of P. canaliculata in our study. Such insignificant association with N content was, however, relevant to other studies on macrophyte herbivory by invertebrates of which feeding could be inhibited by the presence of some levels of deterrents regardless of plant nutrient content [33,46,47]. Moreover, all five macrophytes in this study had relatively high N content (2.18%–4.28%) as compared to the published data from other wild macrophytes, e.g., [30,32,46]. Since N was needed as an essential element by snails for metabolic requirements [34,45], the macrophyte food sources appeared to provide sufficient N to support the survival of P. canaliculata. On the contrary, P was an essential but limiting resource for protein synthesis in plants and animals of most aquatic ecosystems, the ambient P concentration in our sampling site was generally low (0.05–0.58 mg/L) [48]. Therefore, macrophytes with high P content could enhance the plant palatability and growth of P. canaliculata in the environment where N was not limited, e.g., constructed wetlands.
In fact, accumulated studies on macrophyte effects of most invertebrate herbivores emphasized that plant nutrient contents were only secondarily important for determining plant palatability, however the levels of chemical and physical defensive characteristics were of primary importance for determining their feeding preferences and growth rates [47,49,50]. It has been reported that the food selection, feeding and growth of herbivorous snails, including P. canaliculata, P. paludosa, Lymnaea stagnalis (Lymnaeidae) and Littoraria irrorata (Littorinidae), were affected by more than one plant characteristics [32,33,51,52,53]. Thus, both nutrient content and defensive characteristics of macrophytes were considered strongly influential on the feeding and growth rates of P. canaliculata in our study. As generalist herbivores, P. canaliculata tended to feed on plants with high nutrients (benefits) and low defensive characteristics (cost) to maximise their energy intake and fitness according to the optimal foraging theory, see [45,46,54]. An earlier study on rice system also demonstrated that P. canaliculata had significantly higher feeding performance on young plants [22]. Such selective herbivory indicated that physical defensive characteristics, in addition to nutrient contents, of macrophytes could play an important role on feeding and growth of P. canaliculata. Tissue toughness or dry-matter content which was largely associated with cell-wall components, i.e., cellulose content, has been commonly regarded as a strong determinant for macrophyte palatability to snails and other invertebrates [52,55,56]. P. canaliculata exhibited low palatability of Phragmites leaves, but more than five-fold increase in the snail consumption of the reconstituted-Phragmites, which was made by mixing homogenized dried Phragmites leaves with agar containing the same chemical contents as natural Phragmites but damaged physical structure [30]. Hence, this confirmed the critically deterrent effect of physical defensive characteristics of macrophytes, particularly for Phragmites that contained only low level of phenolics, on the feeding and growth performance of P. canaliculata in the present study.
Plant phenolic content was generally considered to have inhibition effects on the feeding and growth of herbivorous snails, but there was no consistent findings of its deterrent effect on the life-history traits of Pomacea spp. Both P. maculata and P. canaliculata exhibited low sensitivity to defensive chemicals, [57,58]. However, feeding preference of Pomacea spp. generally responded primarily to plant chemistry [33]. Several studies also suggested that high plant phenolics of macrophytes could be the key defensive characteristic against herbivory of P. canaliculata, the consumption, survival and growth were strongly determined by phenolics [30,32,34]. Our results showed that phenolics was one of the best explanatory variables for snail feeding rate despite that the phenolic contents of all study macrophytes were relatively low (<3.1%) as compared to other macrophytes from wild populations. In fact, other non-phenolic defensive chemicals might be present in the macrophyte tissues deterring the snail feeding and growth [55], and further study would be needed for better understanding of macrophyte effects on snail herbivory by analysis of other secondary metabolites and their defensive characteristics.
Apple snails are capable of undergoing aestivation to enter a state of dormancy with lowered metabolic rate during unfavourable conditions such as food scarcity, low temperature and drought as their adaptation strategy in the highly variable wetland environment [13,14,16,34,59]. The aestivated snails could persist through periods of low food availability as the result of increasing their food assimilation by reducing their feeding rates and increasing food retention time in their digestive systems. In our study, P. canaliculata fed with nutrient-poor and highly-defensive Phragmites and Acorus showed little feeding and growth, and lowest reproductive output. Though no mortality of the aestivated snails was observed throughout our experiments, all experimental individuals reared on these two plants became less active. This was because of under-nutrition and accumulation of uric acid in the snail bodies, and thus their mortality risk could be increased for long periods of aestivation [14,59,60,61]. Previous studies found that P. canaliculata underwent starvation and survived for 2–20 weeks during food deprivation, e.g., [16,32]. Pomacea canaliculata also exhibited aestivation behavior with low growth and high mortality in a 30-day feeding treatment with a low N-content plant (~0.5%) [34]. Therefore, macrophyte species exhibiting critical minimum level of food quality, i.e., elevated levels of defensive characteristics with poor nutrition, could strongly inhibit the feeding and growth of P. canaliculata given that no other macrophyte species or food types are available in the environment. However, further studies investigating the effect of feeding preference and growth rates of P. canaliculata upon offering multiple choices of macrophytes with various characteristics would be needed for determining the importance of mixing diets of different plant species and different combinations of plant physical and chemical characteristics on life-history traits and fitness of the apple snails.

4.2. Snail Fecundity Performance

As similar to the growth response, quality of macrophytes play an important role on determining the reproductive output of P. canaliculata, i.e., number of clutches and clutch size produced per female snail. In this study, plant N, phenolic and cellulose contents were the most influential factors on snail reproductive output. Female snails fed with the most nutritive and least defensive Ipomoea exhibited the highest reproductive output. But, females reared on the nutrient-poor and highly-defensive Acorus and Phragmites had the lowest reproductive output and the clutch size was <30% that of the reported range for P. canaliculata from literature (clutch size = 200–300 eggs) [13,18,62]. Our findings were consistent to previous studies on snail fecundity such that egg production of P. canaliculata was positively correlated with plant N and P contents, e.g., [16,32]. Other ecological studies also indicated that P. canaliculata had lower egg production during food (nutrient)-limited conditions [63,64]. As the fecundity was considered the strongest predictor for invasive success in mollusks [65], Acorus and Phragmites could provide an inhibitory effect on the clutch size and number of clutch produced by female P. canaliculata and hence limit the colonisation extent of this invasive pest in constructed wetlands.
The offspring quality of P. canaliculata was consistent regardless the maternal feeding conditions, except that individuals reared on Phragmites produced eggs with significantly lower hatching success (<10%) as compared to individuals fed with the other four macrophytes (~50%). Previous investigations revealed that neither food quality of macrophyte species nor food availability had strong association with egg hatching success [32,62,63,66]. Also, the egg hatching success of Pomacea spp. varied greatly in both laboratory and field environments (P. canaliculata = 0%–99.0%; P. maculata = 0.9%–94.3%). In this study, only 35% of the variation of egg hatching success of P. canaliculata was explained by plant phenolic and cellulose contents according to the best subset regression model. This suggested that other important factors, such as temperature, water level, population density and other food conditions could be responsible for controlling the snail egg-hatching success, e.g., [67,68].
Accumulated studies supported that the offspring size of P. canaliculata was a relatively conservative life-history trait; it was independent of maternal feeding condition and less variable than the offspring quantity [14,63,64,69]. This agreed to our findings that either DM-egg or DM-neonate produced by female snails did not exhibit any difference among the five macrophyte feeding treatments, and all measured plant characteristics did not have any influence on the offspring size. Total clutch weight laid by female P. canaliculata per day decreased significantly under food-limiting conditions (high food level: 0.23 ± 0.10 g·d−1, low food level: 0.12 ± 0.04 g·d−1, p < 0.01); but the efficiency of transforming ingested food into eggs remained constant (high food level: 0.022 ± 0.008, low food level: 0.015 ± 0.007, p > 0.1) [63]. Thus, food scarcity could affect the snail reproductive output (i.e., clutch size); but this did not affect the offspring quality (i.e., egg size). Decrease in food availability could induce female P. canaliculata to change their strategy by allocating their energy to maintain the egg size and neonate survival time but sacrificing the clutch size [64]. According to our findings, the experimental females were still capable of producing an average of 0.5–1 egg clutch during the first two weeks of the feeding treatments with the nutrient-poor and highly defensive Phragmites and Acorus. This indicated that female snails could allocate their maternal reserve, resulting from feeding on other palatable food in the field before they were collected for the present experiment, to support their reproduction when facing short-term shortage of palatable food. Such adaptive traits of the apple snails are beneficial for maximising the fecundity and offspring survival, and sustaining the populations in the highly variable wetland environments in particular constructed wetlands with low habitat stability and intensive human disturbance [7,62,70,71].

4.3. Implications for Bottom-up Control for the Apple Snails in Constructed Wetlands

As indicated by previous studies that ontogenetic diet shift was not distinctive between juvenile and adult Pomacea spp. (e.g., P. canaliculata and P. maculata), this resulted in strong intra-specific competition among different-sized individuals on food resources [14,57,69,72]. Small-sized P. canaliculata had higher foraging capacity than large individuals, and they could therefore cause stronger impacts on macrophytes and greater damage to invaded wetlands [57,73]. However, in constructed wetlands predominantly planted with the macrophyte species of low palatability, e.g., Phragmites and Acorus, small snails could have higher mortality due to aestivation as compared to adults that exhibited competitive advantages to withstand starvation, see [59,72]. Although our results revealed that the offspring quality of P. canaliculata was unaffected by the maternal feeding condition, the reduced growth and offspring quantity of the poorly-fed or aestivated snails in constructed wetlands dominated by the less-palatable macrophytes could result in limitation of invasive success and population growth of P. canaliculata.
Many constructed wetlands have been established for wastewater treatment purpose, and the essential roles of macrophytes for pollutant removal in constructed wetlands have been well established [21,74]. However, the massive herbivory of restored macrophytes by the invasive P. canaliculata have become a major cause of ecosystem dysfunctioning of constructed wetlands [8,14]. Therefore, planting appropriate macrophyte species in constructed wetlands would be important for not only maximising pollutant removal efficiency, but also maintaining adequate macrophyte species and biomass via bottom-up control of P. canaliculata. Comparisons of the pollutant removal efficiency by common macrophytes in constructed wetlands revealed that Ipomoea and Commelina exhibited only limited capability for uptaking nutrients and heavy metals, but Phragmites had markedly high pollutant removal ability and better tolerance to various conditions of constructed wetlands [74,75,76,77]. Although Ipomoea has been widely planted in the tropical and subtropical constructed wetlands, it could be inappropriate to plant this macrophyte in constructed wetlands as it represented a highly palatable food source and provided good support for growth and fecundity for the invasive P. canaliculata. In contrast, as a native species in Asian wetlands with high pollutant removal ability, Phragmites would be a better option for planting in constructed wetlands, in particular designed for wastewater treatment, for enhancing their ecological functions and achieving the bottom-up management of the invasive apple snails [77,78]. It must be noted that extensive planting of Phragmites may provide effective control for the invasive apple snails, but Phragmites can out-compete other plant species in the constructed wetlands and dominates the floral community resulting in the reduction of habitat heterogeneity and wetland biodiversity. Therefore, this would not be an appropriate strategy for those constructed wetlands created for biodiversity enhancement, habitat mitigation or ecological restoration purposes.
Given the technical difficulty in complete eradication of P. canaliculata from invaded constructed wetlands, a well-designed planting program with screening criteria including low N and P contents and high levels of phenolics, cellulose and toughness could be useful for selecting appropriate macrophyte species as bottom-up control agent for the highly competitive P. canaliculata. Undoubtedly, extensive planting of any single macrophyte species in constructed wetlands would not be a good management strategy. The present work represented the first step to promote bottom-up control strategy to the invasive P. canaliculata in constructed wetlands. We suggest that future research be directed to investigate how different mixtures of multiple macrophyte species affect the life-history traits and population dynamics of P. canaliculata so as to develop the multi-species planting guides for effective bottom-up control of the apple snails in the constructed wetlands established for different purposes.

5. Conclusions

The massive herbivory of restored macrophytes by the invasive Pomacea canaliculata have become a major cause of ecosystem dysfunctioning of the constructed wetlands. Our results indicated that P. canaliculata exhibited different feeding rates on the five common macrophytes in constructed wetlands and their life-history traits varied greatly upon feeding with different plants. The apple snails reared on Ipomoea had the highest feeding and growth rates with highest reproductive output, but all individuals fed with Acorus and Phragmites showed lowest feeding rates and little growth with poorest reproductive output. The plant N and P contents were important for enhancing palatability and supporting growth and offspring quantity of P. canaliculata, whilst toughness, cellulose and phenolic contents had critical deterrent effects on various life-history traits. In the constructed wetlands dominated by the poorly-palatable macrophytes, the reduced growth and offspring quantity of the poorly-fed or aestivated snails could result in limitation of invasive success and population growth of P. canaliculata.
Although Ipomoea has been widely planted in most constructed wetlands, it could be an inappropriate macrophyte to plant in treatment constructed wetlands as this species not only exhibited limited pollutant uptaking capability but also represented a highly palatable food source for P. canaliculata, highly supporting its growth and fecundity. In contrast, Phragmites would be a better option for planting in constructed wetlands for enhancing the multiple wetland functions and achieving the bottom-up control of the invasive apple snails due to its high pollutant removal ability, better tolerance to wetland conditions and low palatability to P. canaliculata. However, extensive planting of Phragmites would result in reduction of habitat heterogeneity and wetland biodiversity of constructed wetlands. Future studies should focus on investigating how different mixtures of multiple macrophyte species affect the life-history traits and population dynamics of P. canaliculata so as to develop the multi-species planting guides for effective bottom-up control of the apple snails in the constructed wetlands established for different purposes.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express our gratitude to the editor and three anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant Number: NSC100-2815-C-002-158-B). We acknowledged the High Riverbank Construction Management Office from New Taiwan City Government for issuing the entry permission of Daniaopin Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Rita S. W. Yam and Tzu-Ting Wang. Performed the experiments: Rita S. W. Yam, Yen-Tzu Fan and Tzu-Ting Wang. Analyzed the data: Rita S. W. Yam, Yen-Tzu Fan and Tzu-Ting Wang. Contributed materials/analysis tools: Rita S. W. Yam. Wrote the paper: Rita S. W. Yam.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zedler, J.B. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mitsch, W.J.; Jørgensen, S.E. Treatment wetlands. In Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration; Mitsch, W.J., Jørgensen, S.E., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 230–262. [Google Scholar]
  3. Verhoeven, J.T.A.; Arheimer, B.; Yin, C.; Hefting, M.M. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21, 96–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hansson, L.A.; Brönmark, C.; Nilsson, P.A.; Åbjörnsson, K. Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: Nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshwater Biol. 2005, 50, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hsu, C.B.; Hsieh, H.L.; Yang, L.; Wu, S.H.; Chang, J.S.; Hsiao, S.C.; Su, H.C.; Yeh, C.H.; Ho, Y.S.; Lin, H.J. Biodiversity of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1533–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bellakhal, M.; Neveu, A.; Aleya, L. Artificial wetlands as a solution to the decline in the frog population: Estimation of their suitability through the study of population dynamics of Sahara Frogs in hill lakes. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 63, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ehrenfeld, J.G. Exotic invasive species in urbanized wetlands: Environmental correlates and implications for wetland management. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1160–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carlsson, N.O.L.; Brönmark, C.; Hansson, L.-A. Invading herbivory: The golden apple snail alters ecosystem functioning in Asian wetlands. Ecology 2004, 85, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Charles, H.; Dukes, J.S. Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services. In Biological Invasions (Ecological Studies, Volume 193); Nentwig, W., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany; Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 217–237. [Google Scholar]
  10. Maine, M.A.; Hadad, H.R.; Sánchez, G.C.; Mufarrege, M.M.; Di Luca, G.A.; Caffaratti, S.E.; Pedro, M.C. Sustainability of a constructed wetland faced with a depredation event. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yam, R.S.W.; Huang, K.-P.; Hsieh, H.-L.; Lin, H.-J.; Huang, S.-C. An ecosystem-service approach to evaluate the role of non-native species in urbanized wetlands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 3926–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Available online: http://www.issg.org/database/species/reference_files/100English.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2015).
  13. Cowie, R.H. Apple snails (Ampullariidae) as agricultural pests: their biology, impacts and management. In Molluscs as Crop Pests; Barker, G.M., Ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2002; pp. 145–192. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayes, K.A.; Burks, R.L.; Castro-Vazquez, A.; Darby, P.C.; Heras, H.; Martín, P.R.; Qiu, J.-W.; Thiengo, S.C.; Vega, I.A.; Wada, T.; et al. Insights from an integrated view of the biology of Apple Snails (Caenogastropoda: Ampullariidae). Malacologia 2015, 58, 245–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Naylor, R. Invasions in agriculture: Assessing the cost of the golden apple snail in Asia. Ambio 1996, 25, 443–448. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lach, L.; Britton, D.K.; Rundell, R.J.; Cowie, R.H. Food preference and reproductive plasticity in an invasive freshwater snail. Biol. Invasions 2000, 2, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kwong, K.L.; Dudgeon, D.; Wong, P.K.; Qiu, J.-W. Secondary production and diet of an invasive snail in freshwater wetlands: Implications for resource utilization and competition. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kyle, C.H.; Plantz, A.L.; Shelton, T.; Burks, R.L. Count your eggs before they invade: Identifying and quantifying egg clutches of two invasive apple snail species (Pomacea). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carlsson, N.O.L.; Lacoursière, J.O. Herbivory on aquatic vascular plants by the introduced golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) in Lao PDR. Biol. Invasions 2005, 7, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, L.; Wong, P.K.; Lin, L.; Lan, C.; Qiu, J.-W. Impact of invasive apple snails in Hong Kong on wetland macrophytes, nutrients, phytoplankton and filamentous algae. Freshwater Biol. 2010, 55, 1191–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brix, H. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Litsinger, J.A.; Estano, D.B. Management of the golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in rice. Crop Protect. 1993, 12, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Halwart, M. The golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata in Asian rice farming systems: Present impact and future threat. Int. J. Pest Manag. 1994, 40, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. San Martín, R. Recent developments in the use if botanical molluscicides against golden apple snails (Pomacea canaliculata). In Global Advances in Ecology and Management of Golden Apple Snails; Joshi, R.C., Sebastian, L.C., Eds.; Philippine Rice Research Institute: Munoz, Philippines, 2006; pp. 393–403. [Google Scholar]
  25. Teo, S.S. Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice. Crop Protect. 2001, 20, 99–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yusa, Y.; Sugiura, N.; Wada, T. Predatory potential of freshwater animals on an invasive agricultural pest, the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae), in Southern Japan. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ip, K.K.L.; Liang, Y.; Lin, L.; Wu, H.; Xue, J.; Qiu, J.-W. Biological control of invasive apple snails by two species of carp: Effects on non-target species matter. Biol. Control 2014, 71, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hairston, N.G.; Smith, F.E.; Slobodkin, L.B. Community structure, population control, and competition. Am. Nat. 1960, 94, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mcqueen, D.J.; Johannes, M.R.S.; Post, J.R.; Stewart, T.J.; Lean, D.R.S. Bottom-up and top-down impacts on freshwater pelagic community structure. Ecol. Monogr. 1989, 59, 289–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wong, P.K.; Liang, Y.; Liu, N.Y.; Qiu, J.-W. Palatability of macrophytes to the invasive freshwater snail Pomacea canaliculata: Differential effects of multiple plant traits. Freshwater Biol. 2010, 55, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wada, T. Strategies for controlling the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae) in Japanese direct-sown paddy field. Japan Agr. Res. Quart. 2004, 38, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qiu, J.-W.; Kwong, K.-L. Effects of macrophytes on feeding and life-history traits of the invasive apple snail Pomacea canaliculata. Freshwater Biol. 2009, 54, 1720–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morrison, W.E.; Hay, M.E. Herbivore preference for native vs. exotic plants: Generalist herbivores from multiple continents prefer exotic plants that are evolutionary naïve. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qiu, J.-W.; Chan, M.T.; Kwong, K.L.; Sun, J. Consumption, survival and growth in the invasive freshwater snail Pomacea canaliculata: Does food freshness matter? J. Mollus. Stud. 2011, 77, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chapin, F.S., III; Autumn, K.; Pugnaire, F. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am. Nat. 1993, 142, S78–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lacoul, P.; Freesman, B. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Rev. 2006, 14, 89–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ueng, Y.-T.; Kuan, L.-H.; Weng, C.-J.; Chen, W.-D.; Chen, K.-N. A study of population distribution of freshwater mollusks in Taiwan. Bull. Malacol. Taiwan 2011, 35, 46–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  38. Hunter, R.D.; Lull, W.W. Physiologic and environmental factors influencing the calcium-to-tissue ratio in populations of three species of freshwater Pulmonate snails. Oecologia 1977, 29, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Estoy, G.F., Jr.; Yusa, Y.; Wada, T.; Sakurai, H.; Tsuchida, K. Size and age at first copulation and spawning of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2002, 37, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Flindt, M.R.; Lillebø, A.I. Determination of total nitrogen and phosphorus in leaf litter. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide; Graça, M.A.S., Bärlocher, F., Gessner, M.O., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  41. American Public Health Association; American Water Work Association; Water Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bärlocher, F.; Graça, M.A.S. Total phenolics. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide; Graça, M.A.S., Bärlocher, F., Gessner, M.O., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gessner, M.O. Proximate lignin and cellulose. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide; Graça, M.A.S., Bärlocher, F., Gessner, M.O., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  44. Graça, M.A.S.; Zimmer, M. Leaf toughness. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide; Graça, M.A.S., Bärlocher, F., Gessner, M.O., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mattson, W.J., Jr. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 1980, 11, 119–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lodge, D.M. Herbivory on freshwater macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 1991, 41, 195–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Newman, R.M. Herbivory and detritivory on freshwater macrophytes by invertebrates: A review. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 1991, 10, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, K.-P. Study on the Disturbances, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions in Constructed Wetlands from, Subtropical Taiwan. Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bolser, R.C.; Hay, M.E.; Lindquist, N.; Fenical, W.; Wilson, D. Chemical defenses of freshwater macrophytes against crayfish herbivory. J. Chem. Ecol. 1998, 24, 1639–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prusak, A.C.; O’Neal, J.; Kubanek, J. Prevalence of chemical defenses among freshwater macrophytes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 1145–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sharfstein, B.; Steinman, A.D. Growth and survival of the Florida apple snail (Pomacea paludosa) fed 3 naturally occurring macrophyte assemblages. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2001, 20, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Elger, A.; Lemoine, D. Determinants of macrophyte palatability to the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Freshwater Biol. 2005, 50, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hendricks, L.G.; Mossop, H.E.; Kicklighter, C.E. Palatability and chemical defense of Phragmites australis to the marsh periwinkle snail Littoraria irrorata. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Begon, M.; Townsend, C.R.; Harper, J.L. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cronin, G.; Lodge, D.M.; Hay, M.E.; Miller, M.; Hill, A.M.; Horvath, T.; Bolser, R.C.; Lindquist, N.; Wahl, M. Crayfish feeding preferences for freshwater macrophytes: The influence of plant structure and chemistry. J. Crustacean Biol. 2002, 22, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Burlakova, L.E.; Karatayev, A.Y.; Padilla, D.K.; Cartwright, L.D.; Hollas, D.N. Wetland restoration and invasive species: Apple snail (Pomacea insularum) feeding on native and invasive aquatic plants. Restor. Ecol. 2009, 17, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boland, B.B.; Meerhoff, M.; Fosalba, C.; Mazzeo, N.; Barnes, M.A.; Burks, R.L. Juvenile snails, adult appetite: Contrasting resource consumption between two species of applesnails (Pomacea). J. Mollus. Stud. 2008, 74, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hayes, K.A.; Cowie, R.H.; Thiengo, S.C.; Strong, E.E. Comparing apples with apples: Clarifying the identities of two highly invasive Neotropical Ampullariidae (Caenogastropoda). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 2012, 166, 723–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yusa, Y.; Wada, T.; Takahashi, S. Effects of dormant duration, body size, self-burial and water condition on the long-term survival of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2006, 41, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Giraud-Billoud, M.; Abud, M.A.; Cueto, J.A.; Vega, I.A.; Castro-Vazquez, A. Uric acid deposits and estivation in the invasive apple-snail, Pomacea canaliculata. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 2011, 158, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Costantini, D. Coping with physical activity and inactivity. In Oxidative Stress and Hormesis in Evolutionary Ecology and Physiology; Costantini, D., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 143–170. [Google Scholar]
  62. Barnes, M.A.; Fordham, R.K.; Burks, R.L.; Hand, J.J. Fecundity of the exotic apple snail, Pomacea insularum. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2008, 27, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Estoy, G.F., Jr.; Yusa, Y.; Wada, T.; Sakurai, H.; Tsuchida, K. Effects of food availability and age on the reproductive effort of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2002, 37, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tamburi, N.E.; Martín, P.R. Effects of food availability on reproductive output, offspring quality and reproductive efficiency in the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13, 2351–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Keller, R.P.; Drake, J.M.; Lodge, D.M. Fecundity as a basis for risk assessment of nonindigenous freshwater molluscs. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, J.; He, Y.-J.; Tan, J.-C.; Xu, C.-X.; Zhong, L.; Wang, Z.-G.; Liao, Q.-G. Characteristics of Pomacea canaliculata reproduction under natural conditions. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 23, 559–565. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  67. Tanaka, K.; Watanabe, T.; Higuchi, H.; Miyamoto, K.; Yusa, Y.; Kiyonaga, T.; Kiyota, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Wada, T. Density-dependent growth and reproduction of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata: A density manipulation experiment in a paddy field. Res. Pop. Ecol. 1999, 41, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Horn, K.C.; Johnson, S.D.; Boles, K.M.; Moore, A.; Siemann, E.; Gabler, C.A. Factors affecting hatching success of golden apple snail eggs: Effects of water immersion and cannibalism. Wetlands 2008, 28, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stearns, S.C. Number and size of offspring. In The Evolution of Life Histories; Stearns, S.C., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992; pp. 150–179. [Google Scholar]
  70. Burks, R.L.; Hensley, S.A.; Kyle, C.H. Quite the appetite: Juvenile island apple snails (Pomacea insularum) survive consuming only exotic invasive plants. J. Mollus. Stud. 2011, 77, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Burlakova, L.E.; Padilla, D.K.; Karatayev, A.Y.; Hollas, D.N.; Cartwright, L.D.; Nichol, K.D. Differences in population dynamics and potential impacts of a freshwater invader driven by temporal habitat stability. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 927–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carlsson, N.O.L.; Brönmark, C. Size-dependent effects of an invasive herbivorous snail (Pomacea canaliculata) on macrophytes and periphyton in Asian wetlands. Freshwater Biol. 2006, 51, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tamburi, N.E.; Martín, P.R. Feeding rates and food conversion efficiencies in the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Caenogastropoda: Ampullariidae). Malacologia 2009, 51, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Greenway, M. Suitability of macrophytes for nutrient removal from surface flow constructed wetlands receiving secondary treated sewage effluent in Queensland, Australia. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Lin, Y.-F.; Jing, S.-R.; Wang, T.-W.; Lee, D.-Y. Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundwater in constructed wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, T.Y.; Kao, C.M.; Yeh, T.Y.; Chien, H.Y.; Chao, A.C. Application of a constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment: A pilot-scale study. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Huang, J.; Wang, S.-H.; Yan, L.; Zhong, Q.-S. Plant photosynthesis and its influence on removal efficiencies in constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lansdown, R.V. Phragmites Australis. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015.RLTS.T164494A79857020.en (accessed on 17 November 2015).
Ijerph 13 00248 g001 1024
Figure 1. Mean (+ SD) of different responses of Pomacea canaliculata upon fed with the five study macrophyte species: (a) feeding rate; (b) SH-growth; (c) DM-growth; (d) Number of clutches produced per female; (e) Clutch size; (f) DM-egg; (g) Egg hatching success; (h) DM-neonate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, NS no significance.
Figure 1. Mean (+ SD) of different responses of Pomacea canaliculata upon fed with the five study macrophyte species: (a) feeding rate; (b) SH-growth; (c) DM-growth; (d) Number of clutches produced per female; (e) Clutch size; (f) DM-egg; (g) Egg hatching success; (h) DM-neonate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, NS no significance.
Ijerph 13 00248 g001
Table
Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of the five study macrophyte species.
Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of the five study macrophyte species.
Macrophyte TypeNPPhenolicsCelluloseLigninToughness
IpomoeaAC4.28 ± 0.91 A0.70 ± 0.17 A0.22 ± 0.01 C8.60 ± 1.39 C1.75 ± 0.90 BC58.86 ± 16.63 D
CommelinaE3.72 ± 0.19 AB0.75 ± 0.03 A1.89 ± 1.26 B15.34 ± 1.27 B2.17 ± 0.07 B79.54 ± 11.35 C
NymphoidesFL3.23 ± 0.34 B0.45 ± 0.04 B2.57 ± 0.05 AB21.13 ± 1.19 AB1.13 ± 0.39 C116.41 ± 20.57 B
AcorusE2.18± 0.10 C0.36 ± 0.06 B3.08 ± 0.07 A22.11 ± 1.18 A1.11 ± 0.58 C176.65 ± 25.44 A
PhragmitesE2.38 ± 0.30 C0.34 ± 0.05 B0.30 ± 0.01 C24.85 ± 1.09 A6.64 ± 0.57 A237.69 ± 38.57 A
Unit for N, P, phenolics, cellulose and lignin = percentage with respect to the dry weight of leaf sample; unit for toughness = g. All macrophyte traits were significantly different among the five species (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.01). The superscript A, B, C and D represented significant groupings under post hoc Tukey comparisons.
Table
Table 2. Mean values (±SD) of percentage plant consumption and percentage SH-growth of Pomacea canaliculata fed with each of the five macrophyte species during the study period.
Table 2. Mean values (±SD) of percentage plant consumption and percentage SH-growth of Pomacea canaliculata fed with each of the five macrophyte species during the study period.
MacrophytePlant ConsumptionSH-Growth
Mean % FeedingFMean % SH-GrowthF
Ipomoea57.18 ± 27.25147.78 ***29.82 ± 8.6178.41 ***
Commelina25.17 ± 8.58249.76 ***17.43 ± 3.7872.56 ***
Nymphoides48.15 ± 18.83189.65 ***14.53 ± 5.1662.23 ***
Acorus2.66 ± 1.07177.31 ***1.46 ± 0.921.56 NS
Phragmites1.33 ± 0.7982.49 ***0.75 ± 0.550.55 NS
*** p < 0.001; NS no significance.
Table
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the macrophyte traits of the five study species.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the macrophyte traits of the five study species.
Macrophyte TraitNPPhenolicsCelluloseLignin
P0.831
Phenolics−0.603NS
Cellulose−0.715−0.4180.541
Lignin−0.387−0.513−0.564NS
Toughness−0.690−0.705NS0.5550.749
NS = No significance.
Table
Table 4. Summary statistics from analysis of best-subset regression comparing each attributes of the life-history traits of Pomacea canaliculata to macrophyte characteristics.
Table 4. Summary statistics from analysis of best-subset regression comparing each attributes of the life-history traits of Pomacea canaliculata to macrophyte characteristics.
Snail Life-History TraitConstantNutrientsDefensive TraitsAdj. R2
NPPhenolicsCelluloseLigninToughness
Feeding rate0.359 0.364−0.081−0.008 0.78
SH-growth0.080 0.018 −0.002 −0.0010.84
DM-growth2.268 0.520 −0.006 −0.0120.76
No. of clutches per female4.8700.127 −0.211−0.181 0.41
Clutch size71.42966.814 −12.914−1.664 0.60
Egg hatching success67.449 −11.821−2.410 0.23
No macrophyte characteristic selected as predictor in the regression model of DM-egg and DM-neonate.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yam, R.S.W.; Fan, Y.-T.; Wang, T.-T. Importance of Macrophyte Quality in Determining Life-History Traits of the Apple Snails Pomacea canaliculata: Implications for Bottom-Up Management of an Invasive Herbivorous Pest in Constructed Wetlands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030248

AMA Style

Yam RSW, Fan Y-T, Wang T-T. Importance of Macrophyte Quality in Determining Life-History Traits of the Apple Snails Pomacea canaliculata: Implications for Bottom-Up Management of an Invasive Herbivorous Pest in Constructed Wetlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13(3):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yam, Rita S. W., Yen-Tzu Fan, and Tzu-Ting Wang. 2016. "Importance of Macrophyte Quality in Determining Life-History Traits of the Apple Snails Pomacea canaliculata: Implications for Bottom-Up Management of an Invasive Herbivorous Pest in Constructed Wetlands" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, no. 3: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop