Characteristics of Two Crustins from Alvinocaris longirostris in Hydrothermal Vents

Crustins are widely distributed among different crustacean groups. They are characterized by a whey acidic protein (WAP) domain, and most examined Crustins show activity against Gram-positive bacteria. This study reports two Crustins, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, from hydrothermal vent shrimp, Alvinocaris longirostris. Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 belong to Crustin Type IIa, with a similarity of about 51% at amino acid level. Antibacterial assays showed that Al-crus 3 mainly displayed activity against Gram-positive bacteria with MIC50 values of 10–25 μM. However, Al-crus 7 not only displayed activity against Gram-positive bacteria but also against Gram-negative bacteria Imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, in a sensitive manner. Notably, in the effective antibacterial spectrum, Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli (ESBLs) and Imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were drug-resistant pathogens. Narrowing down the sequence to the WAP domain, Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7 demonstrated antibacterial activities but were weak. Additionally, the effects on bacteria did not significantly change after they were maintained at room temperature for 48 h. This indicated that Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were relatively stable and convenient for transportation. Altogether, this study reported two new Crustins with specific characteristics. In particular, Al-crus 7 inhibited Gram-negative imipenem-resistant A. baumannii.


Introduction
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small molecular polypeptides with antibacterial activity, which is an important part of the innate immune system, especially for invertebrates, due to the lack of a specific immune system mediated by antibodies. Schnapp et al., first isolated an antimicrobial peptide from the blood cells of crab (Carcinus maenas) in 1996. This antimicrobial peptide is enriched with proline, with a molecular weight of about 6.5 kDa, and has antibacterial effects on Gram-positive and -negative bacteria [1]. Since then, research on antimicrobial peptides of crustacean has begun. The Crustin family is one of the most studied antimicrobial peptides from crustaceans [2][3][4].
The Crustin family is largely from crustaceans with a molecular weight of 7-14 kDa and is characterized by a four-disulfide core containing a whey acidic protein (WAP) domain located at the C-terminus, which is associated with multiple potential functions [5][6][7]. Over 50 Crustin sequences have been reported from various decapods, including crabs, lobsters, shrimp, and crayfish [5]. According to the characteristics of the sequences between the signal peptides and WAP domains, Crustins can be divided into four subtypes as follows. (1) type I: presence of a Cys-rich domain between the signal peptide and WAP domain; this type of antimicrobial peptide is mostly found in crabs, lobsters, and crayfish [8,9]. (2) type II Crustins, mainly found in shrimp, which have a Cys-rich domain and a Gly-rich region of about 40-80 amino acids (aa) adjacent to the signal peptide region [10,11]. They are usually active against Gram-positive bacteria and play a vital role 2 of 13 in immune defense for crustaceans [12][13][14]. There are two sub-groups of type II Crustin (types IIa and IIb), initially classified by differences in the amino acid length of the Gly-rich region and the distance between the Cys-rich region and the WAP domain [15]. (3) Type III Crustins have neither a Gly-rich nor a Cys-rich region.Up to now, they are found only in Penaeus monodon, Fenneropenaeus chinensis, and Eriocheir sinensis [11,16,17]. Many researches do not classify type III Crustin and assign it to the general antimicrobial peptide, similar to Crustins. (4) Type IV Crustins possess two WAP domains and lack a Cys-rich domain [5]. The extra WAP domain at the C-terminal has other potential functions [18][19][20].
Although the antibacterial activities of Crustins have been widely reported, most are only against Gram-positive bacteria [21]. Only a few Crustins from F. chinensiss, spider crab, and P. monodon were reported as acting against Gram-negative bacteria with different activities. For example, CruHa1 from spider crab was found to act against Gramnegative bacteria, Listonella anguillarum, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 12.5 µM [22]. SpCrus6 from Scylla Paramamosain demonstrated weak activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including Vibrio parahemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio harveyi, and Escherichia coli with MIC >25 µM [2]. Additionally, CruHa1 and SpCrus6 belong to Crustin type I; a type II Crustin, Crus-like Pm, from Penaeus monodon, exhibited activity against Gram-negative bacteria with a MIC of 2.5-20 µM [11].
Deep-sea hydrothermal vents are chemosynthetic ecosystems and are extremely hot (200-400 • C), with high pH values and concentrations of heavy metal ions [23]. Due to their unusual chemical and physical features, hydrothermal vents are thought to house unique fauna; more than 600 animal species have been discovered in this extreme environment [24]. Furthermore, organisms living in this extreme environment have unique physiological and metabolic mechanisms to adapt to the extreme environment [25]. Recently, two Crustins, Re-Crustin (type II Crustin) and Crus1 (type I Crustin), were identified from the hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata and Rimicaris sp. (Alvinocarididae family), respectively. Although Crus 1 and Re-Crustin shared a low sequence identity (24%) at the amino acid level, they both showed effective activity against Gram-positive bacteria with a MIC of 2.5-40 µM, but no activity against gram-negative bacteria [26,27].
This study characterized two Crustins (Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7) from another vent shrimp of Alvinocaris longirostris. Furthermore, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were shown to have antibacterial activities on some pathogenic bacteria. Al-crus 7 demonstrated strong activity against imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, gram-negative drug-resistant bacteria, with MIC 50 at 12 µM. Thus, this study added new members to the Crustin family and showed that organisms living in extreme environments might contain unique antibacterial resources.

Characteristics of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 Sequences
Two Crustins, named Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, were cloned from the cDNA library of Alvinocaris longirostris with specific primers designed according to the annotations. The length of Al-crus 3 was 573 bp, with an ORF of 191 amino acids. Al-crus 3 contained a Gly-rich and WAP domain, which are shown by black and red lines, respectively, in Figure 1. The molecular weight (MW) of Al-crus 3 was 20 kDa with a theoretical pI of 7.98, which was calculated using ExPasy (https://web.expasy.org/, accessed on 21 September 2021). The length of Al-crus 7 was 702 bp, with an ORF of 234 amino acids. Al-crus 7 also contained Gly-rich and WAP domains ( Figure 1). The theoretical pI and MW of mature Al-crus 7 were 6.44 and 22 kDa, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequences of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were compared with those of other close Crustins ( Figure 1). For Al-crus 3, the closest sequence was Crustin from Macrobrachium nipponense (NCBI GenBank accession no. QIV66989), with a similarity of 63% at the amino acid level. By contrast, for Al-crus 7, the closest sequence was a The deduced amino acid sequences of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were compared with those of other close Crustins ( Figure 1). For Al-crus 3, the closest sequence was Crustin from Macrobrachium nipponense (NCBI GenBank accession no. QIV66989), with a similarity of 63% at the amino acid level. By contrast, for Al-crus 7, the closest sequence was a Crustin-like peptide from Homarus americanus (NCBI GenBank accession no. KAG7170693) with a similarity of 82% (Table S2). Based on the characteristics of the different Crustin types, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 belonged to type IIa ( Figure 1). There were eight conserved cysteine residues in the WAP domain and 12 cysteine residues in the C-terminal region. Among the 12 conserved cysteine residues, there were three amino acids between the first two cysteine residues (Cys 1 -Cys 2 ), a sequence of 16 or 17 amino acids between Cys 4 -Cys 5 , and a sequence of 8-12 residues between Cys 6 -Cys 7 ( Figure 1). Thus, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 shared around 51% amino acid sequences. Compared with the other two Crustins of Re-Crustin and Crus1 from other hydrothermal vent shrimps, the identities were 53% and 41% at the amino acid level for Al-crus 3, respectively. For Al-crus 7, the identities were 58% and 47%, respectively.

Phylogenetic Analysis of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7
WAP domain-containing proteins from diverse species were selected from NCBI for phylogenetic tree construction with Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7. The results showed that these Crustins were mainly divided into two distinct groups: Group I and Group II. Furthermore, there were four clusters for each group ( Figure 2); for Group I, the first cluster was shrimp Crustins. The Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 examined in this study were also classified into this cluster. Based on the Crustins present here, all the Crustins in this cluster were from shrimp. Some Crustins from shrimp were also classified into other clusters, such as CrusLikeFc1 from Fenneropenaeus chinensis, classified into the second cluster, Crustin-like peptides. Crus1 from Rimicaris sp. was clustered into the cluster of lobster and crayfish Crustins. The fourth cluster in Group I was made up of Carcinins, as they were all from Carcinus maenas based on the present Crustins. For Group II, the four clusters were SLPI, SWD, Elafins, and SWAM. The SWAM cluster included mouse single WAP motif protein 1 (SWAM1) and SWAM2 antibacterial proteins.

Antibacterial Activities of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7
The recombinant Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3), and the deduced molecular masses of the two recombinant proteins were 46 and 48 kDa, respectively, including 26 kDa of GST-tag. Seven Gram-positive bacteria and six Gramnegative bacteria were examined in this assay. The results showed that GST-Al-crus 3 mainly acted against Gram-positive bacteria, including Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli (ESBLs) with MIC 50 values of 10-25 µM; whereas GST-Al-crus 3 showed almost no inhibitory activity against Klebsiella Pneumoniae, MRSA, and Gram-negative bacteria, up to 50 µM. Compared with GST-Al-crus 3, the recombinant GST-Al-crus 7 demonstrated an antibacterial spectrum that acted against Gram-positive bacteria, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Gram-negative bacteria, imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. However, GST-Al-crus 7 could barely inhibit the growth of other Gram-negative bacteria. Although GST-Al-crus 3 displayed strong activity against S. aureus with MIC 50 of 10 µM, GST-Al-crus 7 revealed slight inhibitory activity against the growth of S. aureus (Table 1). Notably, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, E. coli (ESBLs), and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were drug-resistant pathogens in the effective antibacterial spectrum.
To evaluate the thermal stability of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, the GST-Al-crus 3 and GST-Al-crus 7 were kept at different temperatures for 48 h, and then an antibacterial assay was performed on S. aureus. The results showed that there were no significant differences for GST-Al-crus 3 against S. aureus after kept at 4, 25, or −80 • C for 48 h, which was also true for GST-Al-crus 7 ( Figure 3). clusters, such as CrusLikeFc1 from Fenneropenaeus chinensis, classified into the cluster, Crustin-like peptides. Crus1 from Rimicaris sp. was clustered into the c lobster and crayfish Crustins. The fourth cluster in Group I was made up of Carc they were all from Carcinus maenas based on the present Crustins. For Group II, clusters were SLPI, SWD, Elafins, and SWAM. The SWAM cluster included mous WAP motif protein 1 (SWAM1) and SWAM2 antibacterial proteins. To further investigate whether the WAP domain is enough for Crustins to act against bacteria, two peptides containing the WAP domain from Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, designed as Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7, were chemically synthesized, respectively. Al-crusWAP 3 displayed the same effect as Al-crus 3 on Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus subtilis. However, for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (ESBLs), higher MIC 50 values were needed compared with that of Al-crus 3. For Al-crusWAP 7, the effects on Micrococcus luteus and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus were the same as Al-crus 7. However, the MIC 50 of the antibacterial assays on Bacillus subtilis and imipenem- resistant Acinetobacter baumannii resulted in higher values. These results revealed that although Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7 demonstrated antibacterial activity, the effect was weaker than that of the full-length of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 (Table 1).  To further investigate whether the WAP domain is enough for Crustins to act against bacteria, two peptides containing the WAP domain from Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, designed as Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7, were chemically synthesized, respectively. Al-crusWAP 3 displayed the same effect as Al-crus 3 on Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus subtilis. However, for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (ESBLs), higher MIC50 values were needed compared with that of Al-crus 3. For Al-crusWAP 7, the effects on Micrococcus luteus and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus were the same as Al-crus 7. However, the MIC50 of the antibacterial assays on Bacillus subtilis and imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii resulted in higher values. These results revealed that although Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7 demonstrated antibacterial activity, the effect was weaker than that of the full-length of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 (Table 1).

SEM Imaging
The images of the cells were observed using a SEM apparatus after treatment with GST-Al-crus 3 and GST-Al-crus 7. S. aureus, M. luteus, and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were used as examples. The results showed that after treatment for 2 h, the cells underwent morphological changes. Specifically, during the treatment of GST-Al-crus 3,

SEM Imaging
The images of the cells were observed using a SEM apparatus after treatment with GST-Al-crus 3 and GST-Al-crus 7. S. aureus, M. luteus, and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were used as examples. The results showed that after treatment for 2 h, the cells underwent morphological changes. Specifically, during the treatment of GST-Al-crus 3, the cell membranes of S. aureus and M. luteus were ruptured and the cell contents leaked; during the treatment of GST-Al-crus 7, the membranes of S. aureus became more permeable and the membranes of M. luteus became wrinkled. After treatment for 4 h, the number of damaged cells increased. Almost all the examined cells showed morphological changes or were broken after a 6 h treatment ( Figure 4). Notably, for S. aureus and M. luteus, although the cell morphologies changed after treatment with GST-Al-crus 3 and GST-Al-crus 7, their changes were different (Figure 4). By comparison, the cells did not show any change after GST treatment (Figure 4).

Discussion
Marine organisms are a promising reservoir of bioactive products for drug discovery. Additionally, market analysis forecasts that the global market for marine-derived drugs is expected to reach USD 2745.80 million by 2025 [28]. However, to date, few molecular compounds from marine organisms have been approved and applied in clinics. Furthermore, many marine ecosystems have not been explored, especially extreme environments. Extreme environments feature one or more parameters, such as temperature, salinity, osmolality, UV radiation, pressure, and pH, that show values close to the limit of life. Marine organisms living in extreme environments adopt unique survival strategies for survival and reproduction, biosynthesizing an array of biomolecules that are potentially valuable for many applications, such as biotechnology and pharmaceutics. Hydrothermal vents are extreme environments in the deep sea with high salinity, pressure, and temperature, usually on the ocean floor, such as mid-ocean ridges, where tectonic plates are pulled apart. Although an increasing body of research has been conducted on microbiota from hydrothermal vents, there are few studies on macroorganisms. There is even less research on active molecules derived from hydrothermal vent macroorganisms. For example, there are only two published papers related to Crustins from hydrothermal vent macroorganisms. One study reported that a type I Crustin, Crus1, was identified from a hydrothermal vent shrimp, Rimicaris sp. Crus1 shared the highest identity, around 51%, with a type I Crustin from Penaeus vannamei. Crus1 demonstrated effective activity against Gram-positive bacteria by binding to the peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid of the target cell membrane [26]. Another published study analyzed a type II Crustin (Re-Crustin) from hydrothermal vent R. exoculata, which displayed activity against Gram-positive bacteria. In this study, two type IIa Crustins, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, from Alvinocaris longirostris were identified and characterized. Al-crus 7 demonstrated activity against some Gram-positive bacteria and one Gram-negative bacterium in this study. Furthermore, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 affected some drug-resistant pathogens. These results reveal the potential of bioactive molecules from hydrothermal vent macroorganisms. The analysis of the phylogenetic tree indicated that the four vent Crustins were classified into different clusters. Crus 1 was classified into lobster and crayfish Crustins and the other three were in shrimp Crustins, although all of the four Crustins were from vent shrimp. Similar phenomena were observed in some other Crustins, such as CrusLikeFc1 and CrusFc; although both from Fenneropenaeus chinensis, they were assigned to different clusters. CrusPl1, CrusPl2 and CrusPl3 are from Pacifastacus leniusculus, but unlike CrusPl1, CrusPl2, CrusPl3 was assigned to the cluster of Crustin-like peptides. These results suggested that besides the phylogenetic relationships between these macroorganisms, environment microorganisms might be also involved in the evolution of these Crustins.
Antimicrobial peptides are small molecular polypeptides with antibacterial activities that widely exist in organisms, and represent an important part of the body's innate immune system. When pathogenic microorganisms infect the body, they can be synthesized rapidly. When the body produces an inflammatory response, AMPs are generated and released. Furthermore, AMPs are an important molecular barrier for the host to defend against the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms [29]. Antimicrobial peptides have the advantages of low molecular weight, good water solubility, thermal stability, and nontoxicity to the normal cells of higher animals [30]. Moreover, they are easily degraded and cannot easily produce residues. They exhibit different antibacterial mechanisms from antibiotics and can be considered as new anti-bacterial reagents replacing antibiotics. Until now, more than ten antimicrobial peptide families have been found. Furthermore, there are three main AMPs in crustaceans: Penaeidins, Crustins, and anti-lipopolysaccharide factor [2][3][4]. Antibacterial peptides are highly diverse, except for those derived from highly conserved protein cleavage; different species have specific antimicrobial peptide sequences; even species that are closely related are not exempt. There are seven to dozens of antibacterial peptides in each organism [3,31]. Antibacterial peptides exhibit a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses. However, the antibacterial spectrum of each antibacterial peptide is different [32]. In this study, two Crustins were characterized. Although Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were from the same species and belonged to type IIa Crustins, they shared a similar sequence of only about 51% at the amino acid level and displayed different antibacterial activities. Al-crus 3 only displayed inhibitory activity against Gram-positive bacteria, but Al-crus 7 displayed it against some Gram-positive bacteria and one Gram-negative bacterium in this study. Even in the activity against -Gram-positive bacteria, their antibacterial spectrum was different. For Al-crus 3, the Gram-positive bacteria against which they acted encompassed Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli (ESBLs). However, Al-crus 7 only inhibited Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli (ESBLs). By contrast, Al-crus 7 inhibited imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with MIC 50 of 12 µM. The diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their functions are related to the host's response to various pathogenic bacteria and the adjustment of symbiotic flora.
For Crustins, the sequence feature contained at least one WAP domain at their Cterminus. This domain has eight cysteine residues in a conserved arrangement that forms a tightly packed structure, described on PROSITE as a four-disulfide core (4DSC). Previous studies suggest that the antibacterial activity of Crustins is related to the WAP domain. Comparing CruFc with the WAP domain from Fenneropenaeus chinensis, which produces strong antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, CshFc without the WAP domain has almost no antibacterial activity [26]. After mutating the eight Cys residues in the WAP domain of rCrus1 from the deep-sea hydrothermal vent, none of the mutants exhibited bactericidal activity at the minimum bactericidal concentration of rCrus2 [26]. These results supported the viewpoint that the WAP domain is important for the antibacterial activities of Crustins. Nevertheless, no published report has shown whether the WAP domain is enough for Crustins to perform their activities. This study synthesized two peptides, Al-crusWAP 3 and Al-crusWAP 7, derived from Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, with only the WAP domain. Apart from Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus subtilis, Al-crusWAP 3 displayed effects against Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli (ESBLs) with higher MIC 50 values compared with that of Al-crus 3. Additionally, Al-crusWAP 7 demonstrated the same effects on Micrococcus luteus and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, compared with Al-crus 7. However, for Bacillus subtilis and imipenemresistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Al-crusWAP 7 displayed a higher MIC 50 value. These results showed that the two peptides exhibited lower antibacterial activities than Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, respectively, thus suggesting that other amino acid sequences can contribute together with the WAP domain to the observed antibacterial activity.

Strains, Vectors, Reagents, and Enzymes
The bacteria tested in this study, including Micrococcus luteus (NRR00100), Bacillus subtilis The GST-sefinose (TM) resin was obtained from Sangon (Shanghai, China). Finally, the ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and IPTG were purchased from Sigma (Guangzhou, China), the bacterial culture components were obtained from Sigma (Guangzhou, China), and the restriction enzymes were obtained from Takara (Dalian, China).

Gene Cloning of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7
The RNA extraction, sequencing, assembly, and annotation were performed according to our laboratory's published paper [33]. Based on the sequences of the annotated Crustins, two paired primers of Crustins, Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7, were designed (Table S1). The cDNA library for cloning was synthesized using PrimeScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Dalian, China). Briefly, a 10 µL reaction containing 1 µL Oligo dT Primer (50 µM), 1 µL dNTP mixture (10 mM), and 5 µg total RNA and RNase-Free dH 2 O were kept at 65 • C for 5 min, and then immediately cooled on ice. Next, a 20 µL reaction mixture was prepared by combining the following reagents: 10 µL template RNA and primer mixture (from above), 4 µL 5 × PrimeScript Buffer, 20 units RNase inhibitor, 200 units PrimeScript II RTase, and 4.5 µL RNase-free dH 2 O. After being gently mixed, the reaction mixture was incubated immediately at 42 • C for 45 min and then incubated at 95 • C for 5 min to inactivate the enzymes; this was followed by cooling down on ice. For the targeted Crustin amplification, a 50 µL reaction containing 1 µL of the previously prepared cDNA, 10 µL 5 × PCR buffer, 4 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.5 µL Primer STAR HS DNA Polymerase (Takara, Japan), 32.5 µL ddH 2 O, and 2 µL of 10 uM for each primer was prepared. The PCR program consisted of an initial step of denaturation at 98 • C for 10 s, followed by 30 cycles of 98 • C for 10 s, 50 • C for 30 s, and 72 • C for 1 min, with a final extension of 10 min at 72 • C. The PCR products were purified and linked into the pMD 18-T vector and transferred into the DH5α competent cells. After being cultured at 37 • C overnight with ampicillin, positive colonies were obtained and identified by sequencing (BGI, Shenzhen, China).

Sequence Alignment
A Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) in NCBI server was used to perform the sequence comparison with the GenBank protein database. The sequences of different WAP domain-containing proteins with high similarity were selected from NCBI and are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The sequence alignment was constructed using ClustalW (v.2.0), and a phylogenetic tree was created using the maximum likelihood model of MEGA (v.6.0) with 1000 replications.

Plasmids, Expression, and Purification of Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7
Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 were cloned into a pGEX4T-1 vector with the restriction enzymes Kpn and EcorRI. The procedures of ligation, colony selection, and sequencing were similar to the above mentioned. After the sequence identification, GST-Al-crus 3 and GST-Al-crus 7 were expressed by transferring them into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells and then purified by affinity chromatography using GenScript High-Affinity GST Resin, following the manufacturer's protocol (Sangon, Shanghai, China). Briefly, the E. coli BL21(DE3) with recombinant plasmid was cultured at 37 • C in lysogeny broth (LB) containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml chloromycetin for 12 h. The cultures were diluted (1:1000) with LB broth and subjected to further incubation until the OD 600 reached about 0.8, and then induced by isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After induction for 12 h at 28 • C, the cells were collected and broken by an ultrasonic binding/wash buffer (1 × PBS with 1% Triton X-100) at 4 • C. After ultrasonication, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 8000× g for 30 min, and the supernatant was retained. The recombinant proteins were purified directly from the lysate using GST-sefinose (TM) resin. The supernatant was applied to a Poly-Prep Chromatography Column (BIO-RAD, USA) with 1 ml GST-sefinose (TM) resin, which was pre-washed with a binding/washing buffer. The purified proteins were dialyzed in 1 × PBS at 4 • C for 24 h, with the 1 × PBS replaced every 12 h. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method, using BSA (bovine serum albumin) as the standard. The purified proteins were mixed with a 6 × SDS gel-loading buffer, boiled at 100 • C for 10 min, and resolved with 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250. Finally, the purified proteins were stored at −80 • C in aliquots, unless otherwise specified.

Peptide Synthesis
The peptides from Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 containing the WAP domain were designed and synthesized by GenScript Biological Technology Co., LTD. Al-crusWAP-3 from Al-crus 3: SCPPRRPLCPKFHTPPQTCGNDSKCSGTDKCCLDTCLEVCK, and Al-crusWAP 7 from Al-crus 7: RCPPVRPVCPPVRSFAPPASCSNDGACGGIDKCCYDKCLEQHTCK. The purity of these peptides was more than 98%.

Antibacterial Activity Assays
The examined bacteria from the −80 • C stock were first inoculated on plates, and then a single colony for culture was picked up in LB broth. To avoid contamination, the tested bacteria were further sequenced and identified. Antimicrobial activities were examined against seven Gram-positive and six Gram-negative bacteria. The MIC was determined by a liquid growth inhibition assay [34]. The purified proteins were consecutively diluted with sterile water in five multiples; next, 0.2% BSA was used as the negative control. Aliquots (10 µL) from each dilution were transferred to a 96-well polypropylene microtiter plate (Corning, Wujiang, China), and each well was inoculated with 100 µL of mid-log bacterial suspension (10 5 CFU/ml) in poor broth (1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl (w/v), pH 7.5). The experimental assays were grown for 12 h with shaking at 120 rpm/hr and 37 • C. The OD 600 values were measured every 4 h using a microplate reader (Multiscan FC, Thermo Fisher, American). All the experiments were performed at least three times for the replications. For the thermal stability analysis, the freshly purified proteins were kept at different temperatures for 48 h and then processed to perform antibacterial assays, as mentioned above.
For the peptide antimicrobial activity experiment, the bacteria were the same as those mentioned above. The peptides were centrifuged before dissolution with ddH 2 O to 550 µM and kept at −80 • C in aliquots. Finally, the MIC 50 was determined.

SEM Imaging
The M. luteus, S. aureus, and imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were treated with Al-crus 3 and Al-crus 7 with a MIC 50 concentration, respectively. The treated and controlled samples were collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, respectively. After being washed with PBS, the cells were resuspended in a PBS buffer to about 1 × 10 6 CFU/ml. Next, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA, 5 µL of which were added to the copper films for incubation overnight. After drying, the cooper film with the cells was examined with SEM (JSM-7100F, JEOL, Beijing, China). The normal and abnormal cells were photographed.