Nature-Inspired Compounds: Synthesis and Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing of Eugenol Derivatives against H. pylori Strains

The antimicrobial properties of one of the most important secondary metabolites, Eugenol (EU), inspired us to design and synthesize three different series of derivatives enhancing its parent compound’s anti-Helicobacter pylori activity. Thus, we prepared semisynthetic derivatives through (A) diazo aryl functionalization, (B) derivatization of the hydroxy group of EU, and (C) elongation of the allyl radical by incorporating a chalcogen atom. The antibacterial evaluation was performed on the reference NCTC 11637 strain and on three drug-resistant clinical isolates and the minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MICs and MBCs) highlight the role of chalcogens in enhancing the antimicrobial activity (less than 4 µg/mL for some compounds) of the EU scaffold (32–64 µg/mL).


Introduction
Nature has always been a great source of medicaments; providing drugs directly or inspiring their design.Plants have only chemistry to fight for their survival from microbial attacks or weather and this is why they produce several bioactive molecules and metabolites that humans have studied and used for a wide variety of purposes, including the treatment of infectious diseases and cancer, in the preservation of food, and in cosmetics [1,2].In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that 80% of people worldwide resort to medicinal plants for their primary health care [3].
In this context, essential oils are widely recognized as an interesting source of bioactive compounds that are worthy of investigation, especially for their phenolic components.This is due to their peculiar multitarget pharmacology, which is probably due to the presence and positioning of the hydroxyl function on the phenolic core [4].Among these small molecules, eugenol (EU, chemically, 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol, Figure 1) has emerged for its bioactivity and safety profile (with a dose of safety corresponding to 2.5 mg/Kg body) [5].This has prompted the WHO to put it on its list of compounds that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [6].
EU acts as a membrane active agent, causing a loss of membrane integrity of bacteria through several mechanisms of action, such as the inhibition of lipid peroxidation and ROS generation, cytoplasmatic and cell wall lysis, cell contents leakage, cytoplasm coagulation, impairment of membrane proteins and enzymatic activities, and the depletion of the proton motive force [21][22][23].
The presence of the phenolic group is widely recognized to be related to the overall antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties, since it confers a hydrophilic feature to the compound, allowing penetration into the lipopolysaccharide bilayer and entry in the cell, where it disrupts the membrane depolarization due to its proton exchange capability and the final cellular contents leakage and cell lysis.Additionally, the number and position of hydrocarbon substituents on the phenyl ring strongly impact the biological activity and should be considered in reliable drug design approaches.Infection of H. pylori is responsible for several gastric diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic and duodenal ulcers [24]; in addition, this pathogen has been well recognized as an important risk factor for the development of gastric adenocarcinoma, which occurs in 1-2% of infected patients.The increasing incidence of inflammation, gastric cancer, intestinal metaplasia, and other severe illnesses caused by H. pylori requires careful attention as well as increased medical efforts to counteract the pathogen infection [25].
In the fight against H. pylori infection, a limited number of approved drugs and impactful strategies are currently available, and the main therapies are based on the combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), clarithromycin (CLR), and amoxicillin (AMX) or metronidazole (MTZ).However, the occurrence of antibiotic resistance is one of the most important factors responsible for the failure of H. pylori eradication therapy; in this view, the identification of different resistant phenotypes and the development of personalized treatments based on antibiotic susceptibility are becoming increasingly important [26,27].
With the alarming increase in bacterial resistance to antibiotics, especially CLR and MTZ, alternative and complementary strategies are under evaluation, including the use of natural compounds and nanotechnological formulations [28].Along with other structurally related phenols (such as thymol and carvacrol) [29][30][31], EU has been identified as an interesting hit compound in the search for novel, nature-inspired agents useful in the treatment of H. pylori infections [32].
In this work, we report the development of three series of EU derivatives (A-C): • A, a diazo function was added in the ortho position, to explore the chemical space near the phenolic group and keep the OH function unsubstituted (1-7, Table 1); • B, the phenolic group of the EU was alkylated (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) or incorporated into a carbamate (16)(17)(18) or ester (19 and 20, Table 1) moiety; • C, the allylic portion of the EU was replaced by a differently substituted tail, including an epoxide ring (21, Table 1), or alcohol chains (22) containing a chalcogen (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).EU acts as a membrane active agent, causing a loss of membrane integrity of bacteria through several mechanisms of action, such as the inhibition of lipid peroxidation and ROS generation, cytoplasmatic and cell wall lysis, cell contents leakage, cytoplasm coagulation, impairment of membrane proteins and enzymatic activities, and the depletion of the proton motive force [21][22][23].
The presence of the phenolic group is widely recognized to be related to the overall antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties, since it confers a hydrophilic feature to the compound, allowing penetration into the lipopolysaccharide bilayer and entry in the cell, where it disrupts the membrane depolarization due to its proton exchange capability and the final cellular contents leakage and cell lysis.Additionally, the number and position of hydrocarbon substituents on the phenyl ring strongly impact the biological activity and should be considered in reliable drug design approaches.Infection of H. pylori is responsible for several gastric diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic and duodenal ulcers [24]; in addition, this pathogen has been well recognized as an important risk factor for the development of gastric adenocarcinoma, which occurs in 1-2% of infected patients.The increasing incidence of inflammation, gastric cancer, intestinal metaplasia, and other severe illnesses caused by H. pylori requires careful attention as well as increased medical efforts to counteract the pathogen infection [25].
In the fight against H. pylori infection, a limited number of approved drugs and impactful strategies are currently available, and the main therapies are based on the combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), clarithromycin (CLR), and amoxicillin (AMX) or metronidazole (MTZ).However, the occurrence of antibiotic resistance is one of the most important factors responsible for the failure of H. pylori eradication therapy; in this view, the identification of different resistant phenotypes and the development of personalized treatments based on antibiotic susceptibility are becoming increasingly important [26,27].
With the alarming increase in bacterial resistance to antibiotics, especially CLR and MTZ, alternative and complementary strategies are under evaluation, including the use of natural compounds and nanotechnological formulations [28].Along with other structurally related phenols (such as thymol and carvacrol) [29][30][31], EU has been identified as an interesting hit compound in the search for novel, nature-inspired agents useful in the treatment of H. pylori infections [32].
The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].The designed compounds 1-30 were synthesized through straightforward and highyielding synthetic pathways and then in vitro tested to assess the antibacterial susceptibility of four H. pylori strains, including a reference compound from the NCTC culture collection (NCTC 11637) and three drug-resistant clinical isolates (namely F1, 23, and F40/499) [33].

Chemistry
Azoderivatives 1-7 were synthesized through the traditional diazotization reaction of the suitable substituted aniline with sodium nitrite in acid environment at 0 • C and the following addition of EU in basic solution for NaOH, as depicted in Scheme 1.

Chemistry
Azoderivatives 1-7 were synthesized through the traditional diazotization reaction of the suitable substituted aniline with sodium nitrite in acid environment at 0 °C and the following addition of EU in basic solution for NaOH, as depicted in Scheme 1. O-derivatization in series B to compounds 8-20 was performed as depicted in Scheme 2. In refluxing acetonitrile (ACN) and basic environment, EU was reacted with methyl iodide or propargyl bromide to obtain compounds 8 and 9, respectively, or epibromohydrin for epoxide derivative 10.The reaction of EU with 2-iodoethanol, in refluxing N,Ndimethylformamide (DMF), afforded the alcohol 11; with proper epoxide-styrene oxide, 2,3-epoxypropyl benzene, or 1,2-epoxy-3-phenoxypropane-it gave derivatives 12-14, respectively; with 1,5-dibromopentane in the suitable ratio yielding the dimeric ether 15.Instead, the preparations of carbamates 16-18 were carried out by reacting EU with the proper isocyanates-phenyl isocyanate, benzyl isocyanate, or 4-chlorophenyl isocyanate, respectively.Esters 19 and 20 were synthesized by working in an excess of acetic anhydride or in the presence of 1-adamantanecarbonyl chloride, respectively.O-derivatization in series B to compounds 8-20 was performed as depicted in Scheme 2. In refluxing acetonitrile (ACN) and basic environment, EU was reacted with methyl iodide or propargyl bromide to obtain compounds 8 and 9, respectively, or epibromohydrin for epoxide derivative 10.The reaction of EU with 2-iodoethanol, in refluxing N,Ndimethylformamide (DMF), afforded the alcohol 11; with proper epoxide-styrene oxide, 2,3-epoxypropyl benzene, or 1,2-epoxy-3-phenoxypropane-it gave derivatives 12-14, respectively; with 1,5-dibromopentane in the suitable ratio yielding the dimeric ether 15.Instead, the preparations of carbamates 16-18 were carried out by reacting EU with the proper isocyanates-phenyl isocyanate, benzyl isocyanate, or 4-chlorophenyl isocyanate, respectively.Esters 19 and 20 were synthesized by working in an excess of acetic anhydride or in the presence of 1-adamantanecarbonyl chloride, respectively.
The obtainment of series C chalcogen-containing derivatives is reported in Scheme 3. Epoxide 21 was easily prepared upon the reaction of EU with 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) in CH 2 Cl 2 at room temperature (r.t.) for 48 h [34].The alcohol 22 was synthesized following a literature-reported route via reduction of 21 with LiAlH 4 in tetrahydrofuran (THF) [35,36].Epoxide 21 was, then, employed as the common key precursor for the synthesis of the series of chalcogen-containing EU derivatives 23-30.β-Phenylthio, β-phenylseleno, and β-phenyltelluro alcohols 23-25 were prepared via a ring-opening reaction of 21 with phenylchalcogenosylanes (PhSSiMe 3 , PhSeSiMe 3 , and PhTeSiMe 3 ) under tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) catalysis [37].The β-hydroxy sulfide 26 was obtained upon treatment of 21 with 1-pentanethiol in the presence of the Cs 2 CO 3 /tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) system using DMF as a solvent [38].Similarly, the β-hydroxy selenide 27 was synthesized through the ring-opening of 21 with butaneselenolate anions, easily generated in situ by reductive cleavage of dibutyl diselenide with NaBH 4 in ethanol (EtOH) [39].The bidentate selenide 28 was prepared through a related, on-water ring-opening procedure, using sodium selenide (Na 2 Se) as the nucleophilic species [40].Na 2 Se was generated in situ from elemental selenium using rongalite (sodium hydroxymethanesulfinate dihydrate) as the reducing agent and H 2 O as the solvent.The synthesis of the diselenide 29 was pursued by exploiting the TBAF-catalyzed, silicon-mediated reaction of 21 with bis(trimethylsilyl)selenide [(Me 3 Si) 2 Se].The ring-opening reaction of epoxide 21 also enabled the synthesis of β-hydroxy ditelluride 30 following our recently reported rongalitemediated methodology [41].All of the nucleophilic ring-opening reactions herein reported occurred with high regioselectivity, leading to the formation of the product as a result of the attack of the nucleophile onto the less hindered carbon atom of the epoxide 21.In the case of compounds 28-30, a mixture of diastereoisomers was achieved.The obtainment of series C chalcogen-containing derivatives is reported in Scheme 3. Epoxide 21 was easily prepared upon the reaction of EU with 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature (r.t.) for 48 h [34].The alcohol 22 was synthesized following a literature-reported route via reduction of 21 with LiAlH4 in tetrahydrofuran (THF) [35,36].Epoxide 21 was, then, employed as the common key precursor for the synthesis of the series of chalcogen-containing EU derivatives 23-30.β-Phenylthio, βphenylseleno, and β-phenyltelluro alcohols 23-25 were prepared via a ring-opening reaction of 21 with phenylchalcogenosylanes (PhSSiMe3, PhSeSiMe3, and PhTeSiMe3) under tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) catalysis [37].The β-hydroxy sulfide 26 was obtained upon treatment of 21 with 1-pentanethiol in the presence of the Cs2CO3/tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) system using DMF as a solvent [38].Similarly, the β-hydroxy selenide 27 was synthesized through the ring-opening of 21 with butaneselenolate anions, easily generated in situ by reductive cleavage of dibutyl diselenide with NaBH4 in ethanol (EtOH) [39].The bidentate selenide 28 was prepared through a related, on-water ringopening procedure, using sodium selenide (Na2Se) as the nucleophilic species [40].Na2Se was generated in situ from elemental selenium using rongalite (sodium hydroxymethanesulfinate dihydrate) as the reducing agent and H2O as the solvent.The synthesis of the diselenide 29 was pursued by exploiting the TBAF-catalyzed, silicon-mediated reaction of 21 with bis(trimethylsilyl)selenide [(Me3Si)2Se].The ring-opening reaction of epoxide 21 also enabled the synthesis of β-hydroxy ditelluride 30 following our recently reported rongalite-mediated methodology [41].All of the nucleophilic ring-opening reactions herein reported occurred with high regioselectivity, leading to the formation of the product as a result of the attack of the nucleophile onto the less hindered carbon atom of

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity Studies against H. pylori
For this study, we used four strains of H. pylori, the commercial strain NCTC 11637 and three clinical isolates (F1, 23, F40/499), which have previously been identified by Gram staining and characterized in terms of catalase, urease, and oxidase activity.The antibiotic susceptibility was then undertaken with metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin (CLR), and amoxicillin (AMX) as benchmarks.The assessment of genotypic differences among sensitive and resistant clinical isolates should allow better phenotypic discrimination against resistant strains, which usually affect the susceptibility data not only of the parent compound, but also of its derivatives.In the literature, it is also reported that the resistance to MTZ (NCTC 11637 and F40/499) is usually highly associated with the mutational inactivation of the gene encoding an oxygen-independent NADPH nitroreductase, whereas resistance to CLR (F1 and F40/499) is related to the mutation in the macrolide target.The antibacterial activity data for series A-C compounds are reported in Table 1 and comprise minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) values.
These compounds are endowed with low molecular weights and small chemical structures that allow the design of further derivatives through a wide panel of chemical modifications and derivatization aimed at exploring structure-activity relationships (SARs), modulating their bioactivity and overcoming their poor water solubility and volatility, and obtaining derivatives with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.
Observing Table 1, one can see that EU exhibited MIC values between 32 and 64 µg/mL and that MBC values were higher (64-128 µg/mL).A comparable anti-H.pylori activity against the four strains can be noticed, thus suggesting a mechanism of action not related to their resistance pathways for this compound.In any case, the efficacy of EU seemed to be suitable against MTZ-resistant strains.

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity Studies against H. pylori
For this study, we used four strains of H. pylori, the commercial strain NCTC 11637 and three clinical isolates (F1, 23, F40/499), which have previously been identified by Gram staining and characterized in terms of catalase, urease, and oxidase activity.The antibiotic susceptibility was then undertaken with metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin (CLR), and amoxicillin (AMX) as benchmarks.The assessment of genotypic differences among sensitive and resistant clinical isolates should allow better phenotypic discrimination against resistant strains, which usually affect the susceptibility data not only of the parent compound, but also of its derivatives.In the literature, it is also reported that the resistance to MTZ (NCTC 11637 and F40/499) is usually highly associated with the mutational inactivation of the gene encoding an oxygen-independent NADPH nitroreductase, whereas resistance to CLR (F1 and F40/499) is related to the mutation in the macrolide target.The antibacterial activity data for series A-C compounds are reported in Table 1 and comprise minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) values.
These compounds are endowed with low molecular weights and small chemical structures that allow the design of further derivatives through a wide panel of chemical modifications and derivatization aimed at exploring structure-activity relationships (SARs), modulating their bioactivity and overcoming their poor water solubility and volatility, and obtaining derivatives with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.In series A, electron-donating groups on the phenyl ring in the para position, such as the methyl group in compound 1 and the methoxy function in 2, seem to be slightly tolerated, resulting in increased MIC values in which the latter are more potent than the former, exhibiting MIC = 32 µg/mL and MBC values between 32 and 64 µg/mL.Instead, the presence of electron-withdrawing groups in the phenyl para-position, such as cyano (3) or bromine (4), and the presence of two chlorine atoms in meta and para (6) led to a dramatic decrease in activity.In the end, m-chloro (5) and o-chloro (7) phenyl derivatives showed the best results in the series, with MIC values of 8 µg/mL and MBC values between 8 and 16 µg/mL on all the tested strains.Despite chlorine atom and methyl group showing similar van der Waals radii and lipophilic properties, their different electronic features differently affect the antibacterial activity.
In series B, small substituents such as the methyl (8), propargyl (9), and methylenepoxide (10) groups did not significantly affect the bioactivity of the compounds.Interestingly, compound 11, containing a primary hydroxy function, showed a low inhibitory potency, while 12-14, also bearing a hydroxy function on the aliphatic chain, along with carbamate 17, are the best compounds of the series in terms of antibacterial activity.Observing their structures, we could assume that the presence of a phenyl ring contributes to an optimal hydrophobic/polar balance and, thus, the antibacterial profile of such compounds.As regards derivative 15, the presence of two EU units linked through a flexible O-pentyl spacer resulted in being detrimental to the antibacterial activity against the NCTC 11637 and 23 strains, while a better profile than EU is highlighted against F1 and F40/499 strains.
The other two carbamates, 16 and 18, are not worthy of interest, exerting an intermediate activity.However, the presence of chloride in the para position of the phenyl ring in 18 led to a 1-dilution-fold decrease in both MIC and MBC values with respect to the unsubstituted phenyl compound 17.In the end, esters such as acetate (19) and the bulkier adamantyl ester (20) were not able to achieve interesting MIC values.
Notably, series C compounds exhibited the greatest results in the inhibition of H. pylori growth.The epoxide and epoxide-opened ring in 21 and 22, respectively, worsened the antibacterial profile of EU.Compound 24, containing a selenium nucleus, showed the best activity on the MTZ-resistant F40/499 strain, with MIC and MBC values equal to 2 µg/mL, while its analogues with sulfur (23) and tellurium (25) atoms were found to be less potent on the strains panel (MICs = 8-16 µg/mL), though still remaining highly promising antibacterial agents.The replacement of the phenyl ring of 23-24 with aliphatic (pentyl) chains on the chalcogen atom, leading to derivatives 26-27, caused a decrease in antibacterial potency, with the sulfur compound 26 1-dilution-fold more potent than the corresponding selenium analogue 27 on all of the tested strains.The structural complication of the chain in compounds 28-30 gave different results, with 29 being the most potent compound of the C series having MIC and MBC values that range from 2 to 4 µg/mL.However, when the Se-Se bond of 29 is replaced by a single Se atom (28) or a Te-Te bond (30), a decrease in activity was observed.These last modifications were attempts to keep the OH of the parent compound unsubstituted.The design of chalcogen-containing compounds in the C series is envisaged by the increasing interest in organochalcogen derivatives [42].In fact, sulfur compounds are widely employed in medicinal chemistry as antibiotics or synthetic intermediates.Organoselenium compounds were found to possess a potent electrophilic activity, responsible for the attack on cysteine residues in proteins, especially antioxidative enzymes, resulting in their association with oxidative stress through thiol depletion, reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunctions [43].Instead, tellurium organocompounds remain poorly investigated [44].

Chemistry
General chemistry.All commercially available chemicals and solvents were used as purchased.Anhydrous reactions were performed in flame-dried glassware after three cycles of vacuum/dry nitrogen and were run under a positive pressure of dry nitrogen.Chromatographic separations were performed on columns packed with silica gel (230-400 mesh, for flash technique).Reaction monitoring was performed through thin-layer chromatography (TLC) by using 0.2-mm-thick silica gel-aluminum-backed plates (60 F254).TLC spot visualization was performed under short and long wavelength (254 and 365 nm, respectively) ultra-violet irradiation and stained with ninhydrin or basic permanganate stains. 1 H and 13 C NMR were recorded on a spectrometer operating at 300/400 and 75/100 MHz, respectively.Spectra are reported in parts per million (δ scale) and internally referenced to the CDCl 3 , CD 3 OD, and DMSO-d 6 signal, respectively, at δ 7.26, 3.31, and 2.50 ppm.Chemical shifts for carbon are reported in parts per million (δ scale) and referenced to the carbon resonances of the solvent (CDCl 3 at δ 77.0, CD 3 OD at δ 49.0, and DMSO-d 6 at δ 39.0 ppm).Data are shown as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, qi = quintet, m = multiplet and/or multiplet resonances, br = broad signal, ap = apparent), integration and coupling constants (J) in Hertz (Hz).The 1 H and 13 C spectra confirmed the anticipated number of hydrogens and carbons for each compound, respectively.Melting points were measured on a Stuart ® melting point apparatus SMP1 (Fisher Scientific Italia, Segrate (MI), Italy) and are uncorrected (temperatures are reported in • C).Elemental analyses for C, H, and N were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 240 B microanalyzer and the analytical results are within ± 0.4% of the theoretical values for all compounds.Mass spectra were recorded by electrospray ionization (ESI) using a Thermo LCQ-Fleet instrument.Mass spectra (LCMS (ESI)) were acquired using an Agilent 1100 LC-MSD VL system (G1946C, Agilent Technologies Italia Spa, Rome, Italy) by direct injection with a 0.4 mL/min flow rate using a binary solvent system of 95/5 MeOH/H 2 O.Samples were prepared in MeOH or DMSO/MeOH, according to the solubility properties of the test compound, in some cases in presence of formic acid.Mass spectra were performed in positive mode scanning over the mass range 100-1500 m/z, using a variable fragmentor voltage of 0-70 V.

Procedure and Characterization Data for Derivatives 1-30
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 1-7 An aqueous solution of sodium nitrite (638.1 mg, 9.9 mmol in 5 mL of H 2 O) was added to an acidic solution (conc.HCl/H 2 O, 1/10 mL) of the proper substituted aniline (6.6 mmol) at 0-5 • C. The diazonium salt was then coupled by adding a mixture of EU (1.0 mL, 6.6 mmol) in an aqueous solution of NaOH (264.0 mg, 6.6 mmol in 5 mL of H 2 O) keeping the pH value at 8-9.Once the reaction was completed, the mixture was poured into H 2 O and extracted with CHCl 3 three times (3 × 25 mL).The combined organic layers were dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure to afford the crude products.These were then subjected to column chromatography on silica gel, with different n-hexane/EtOAc mixtures as eluent.

Synthesis of 1,5-bis(4-allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)pentane (15)
EU (308 µL, 2.0 mmol) was added to a mixture of 1,5-dibromopentane (70 µL, 1.0 mmol) and K 2 CO 3 (552.8mg, 4.0 mmol) in MeOH (150 mL), at 70 • C for 12 h.After evaporation, H 2 O (25 mL) was added, and the crude was extracted with CHCl 3 (3 × 25 mL).The combined organic layers were then dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure.The crude product was purified through column chromatography on silica gel, using n-hexane/EtOAc 9:1 as eluent.Orange solid, m.p. 62-64 • C, 87% yield. 1  General procedure for the synthesis of carbamates 16-18 TEA (209 µL, 1.5 mmol) was added to a solution of EU (230 µL, 1.5 mmol) in dry ACN (150 mL) at r.t.under a nitrogen atmosphere.The mixture was stirred for 15 min, then the proper isocyanate (phenyl isocyanate, p-chlorophenyl isocyanate, or benzyl isocyanate, 1.65 mmol) was added portionwise.The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 • C for 24 h, it was then cooled down to room temperature.The mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with distilled H 2 O and then dried over Na 2 SO 4 , it was then filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure.The crude products were purified by chromatography on silica gel using CHCl 3 as the eluent.

Synthesis of 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenyl acetate (19)
NaHCO 3 (168.0mg, 2.0 mmol) was added to a mixture of EU (154 µL, 1.0 mmol) and acetic anhydride (4.0 mL) at room temperature for 12 h.The crude product was filtered under vacuum and washed with CH 2 Cl 2 three times (5.0 mL).No further purification was required.Pale yellow oil, 89% yield.Characterization data are in agreement with the previous literature [50].

General Procedure for the synthesis of β-phenylcalcogeno alcohols 23-25
A solution of epoxide 21 (0.5 mmol) and phenylchalcogeno silane (PhSSiMe 3 , PhSeSiMe 3 , or PhTeSiMe 3 ) (0.6 mmol) in dry THF (3 mL) was treated with TBAF (0.24 mL of 1 M THF solution, 0.24 mmol).The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 5 h until complete consumption of the starting material was observed by TLC.Afterward, sat.aq.NH 4 Cl was added (2 mL).The crude product was extracted with CH 2 Cl 2 (20 mL) three times, the combined organic layers were dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure to afford the crude material, which was purified by flash column chromatography using petroleum ether/EtOAc 3:1 as the eluent to afford β-phenylchalcogeno alcohols 23-25.

In Silico Studies
All designed compounds were analyzed by means of SwissADME tool [54] and were found to not be potential pan assay interference compounds (PAINS), with the exception of the diazoderivatives due to the diazo function alert [55].SwissAdme analysis assessed the compounds solubility by classifying them through the ESOL, Ali, and Silicos-IT classes.Herein, we have reported the former classification.Series A was found to be moderately soluble, Series B includes compounds 8-12 and 19 that were found to be soluble and compounds 13-18 and 20 that were found to be moderately soluble.In series C, intermediate 21 and compound 22 were found to be very soluble, compounds 23-24, 26-27, and 30 soluble, and compounds 25, 28, and 29 moderately soluble.In silico toxicity was assessed in silico by means of Molbook software [56] and VenomPred tool [57].Some compounds showed some alerts and thus require further in wet investigation.

Conclusions
Despite the bioactive compounds that nature can provide, medicinal chemists' interventions are often required in order to modify the chemical structures of the compounds in order to improve and modulate their biological function toward a biomedical purpose.In this context, EU is a natural compound widely distributed in essential oils that is endowed with a broad antimicrobial activity profile that also includes anti-H.pylori activity.In this work, we have reported our (MedChem) role in the design of three different chemical modifications of its structure.Thus, we have explored the chemical space around the phenolic OH group in its ortho position through aryl diazotation or derivatizing it via O-alkylation and O-benzylation, and, in the end, replacing the allyl tail, also by introducing one or more chalcogen atoms.Antibacterial susceptibility testing on four strains of H. pylori, including three clinical isolates, highlighted improved activity in some cases.In particular, some chalcogen-containing compounds-26, 27, 29, and 30-displayed 2-(compounds 26-27 and 30, MIC = 16 µg/mL on NCTC 11637 strain) or 4-(compound 26, MIC = 4 µg/mL on NCTC 11637 strain) dilution-fold lower MICs compared with EU, while compound 28 showed worsened bioactivity (MIC = 64 µg/mL on NCTC 11637 strain).
The antibacterial activity was maintained in the resistant clinical isolates; thus, we can assume that the proposed compounds act through an innovative mechanism of action, not shared with already known antibiotics and a specific resistome that has yet to be generated.This finding is very encouraging for the further development of anti-H.pylori agents.Moreover, all the compounds exhibited a bactericidal behavior, which is auspicious in terms of the reduction of the risk of drug-resistant phenomena.However, an in-depth study of generations will be conducted to assess the possible rate of bacterial genome mutation after the administration of the compounds.A combination study with antibiotics currently used in clinics will also be performed in order to preserve this notable feature in future supplication and to avoid the rapid rise of resistance of the biological targets involved.The antibacterial profile of the compounds will also be investigated against different bacterial species to assess if they possess broad-or narrow-spectrum activity.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics.

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/

Table 1 .
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC values) on four H. pylori strains of series A-C compounds and reference antibiotics. MIC/