Selective Spectrofluorimetric Approach for the Assessment of Two Antipsychotic Drugs through Derivatization with O-Phthalaldehyde

A facile and sensible spectrofluorimetric approach for the measurement of two antipsychotic medications, aripiperazole (ARP) and clozapine (CLZ), was devised and validated. The approach involves reacting the examined medicines with o-phthalaldehyde in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol in a borate buffer of pH 9.0 and pH 10 for ARP and CLZ, respectively, to produce a robustly fluorescent compound that is detected at 450 nm following excitation at 340 nm. The experimental variables influencing the performance and product stability were thoroughly investigated and optimized. Under optimal conditions, the intensity of the fluorescence was linear during a concentration range of 0.1–0.5 μg/mL, with a limit of detection (0.0391 and 0.0400 μg/mL) and limit of quantitation (0.1035 and 0.1332 μg/mL), respectively, for ARP and CLZ. The suggested approach was successful in analyzing commercialized tablets. A statistical investigation of the results produced by the suggested and standard methods showed no remarkable variation in the precision and accuracy of the two approaches. A chemical mechanism using o-phthalaldehyde was proposed.


Introduction
Schizophrenia is a serious psychiatric condition that influences around 1.5 percent of the world's community and treated mostly with antipsychotic medicines. Indeed, antipsychotic drugs are one of the pharmaceutical industry products experiencing rapidly increasing demand [1]. Aripiprazole (ARP) and clozapine (CLZ) are two antipsychotics. When compared to traditional antipsychotics, they have been shown to be effective in treating symptoms of schizophrenia and be minimally prone to elicit extrapyramidal side effects. However, large doses of these atypical antipsychotics are thought to raise the likelihood of extrapyramidal or other adverse effects [2][3][4][5][6][7].
Clozapine (CLZ) also belongs to a kind of diazepine and there is no mention of the medication in any pharmacopoeia. Various techniques for clozapine assessment were reported. Liquid chromatography [19][20][21][22], HPLC [23][24][25][26], GC [27], electrophoresis [28,29], voltammetry [30][31][32], and spectrophotometric [33][34][35] are among these approaches. The majority of these solutions have some downsides. HPLC and other approaches require costly instruments that were not readily applicable in the majority of laboratories, and the operations were not easy to carry out. As a result, we set out to create a simple, sensitive, voltammetry [30][31][32], and spectrophotometric [33][34][35] are among these approaches. The majority of these solutions have some downsides. HPLC and other approaches require costly instruments that were not readily applicable in the majority of laboratories, and the operations were not easy to carry out. As a result, we set out to create a simple, sensitive, and selective spectrofluorimetric approach for determining the antipsychotic medicines aripiprazole and clozapine by derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde.

Results and Discussions
As a luminous derivatizing reagent for amino-containing compounds, o-phthalaldehyde in conjunction with a mercapto molecule, such as β-mercaptoethanol, is commonly used. Several medicinal molecules have been identified using this method [36][37][38][39][40]. In the presence of β-mercaptoethanol in a borate buffer, ARP and CLZ reacted with benzene-1,2-dicarboxaldehyde to generate a strongly fluorescent compound with maximal fluorescence at 450 nm following excitation at 340 nm ( Figure 1).

Optimization of Experimental Conditions
The condensation process between ARP and CLZ with o-phthalaldehyde took place at pH 9 and pH 10, in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol, which maintained the product. Scheme 1 depicts the suggested mechanism for ARP as an example. The fluorescence characteristics of the formed product, and the various experimental parameters influencing the formation of the product and product durability have been thoroughly examined and maximized. These variables have been altered separately, while the remains remained stable. The variables comprising concentration of the reagents, time, and pH were all considered.

Optimization of Experimental Conditions
The condensation process between ARP and CLZ with o-phthalaldehyde took place at pH 9 and pH 10, in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol, which maintained the product. Scheme 1 depicts the suggested mechanism for ARP as an example. The fluorescence characteristics of the formed product, and the various experimental parameters influencing the formation of the product and product durability have been thoroughly examined and maximized. These variables have been altered separately, while the remains remained stable. The variables comprising concentration of the reagents, time, and pH were all considered. Scheme 1. Proposed pathway of the reaction between ARP and o-phthalaldehyde in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol in a borate buffer.

Impact of pH
The pH influence of three various buffers was investigated to optimize the reaction parameters. At respective alkaline operating ranges, bicarbonate, phosphate, and borate buffers have been used. Buffers containing amino moieties, such as triethylamine, were avoided because they interact with o-phthalaldehyde. For 45 min, the reaction was performed at ambient temperature. The ultimate intensity of the fluorescence was attained for ARP and CLZ utilizing borate buffer at pH 9 and 10, respectively. After which, the intensity dropped due to excessive background intensity ( Figure 2). Furthermore, a test Scheme 1. Proposed pathway of the reaction between ARP and o-phthalaldehyde in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol in a borate buffer.

Impact of pH
The pH influence of three various buffers was investigated to optimize the reaction parameters. At respective alkaline operating ranges, bicarbonate, phosphate, and borate buffers have been used. Buffers containing amino moieties, such as triethylamine, were avoided because they interact with o-phthalaldehyde. For 45 min, the reaction was performed at ambient temperature. The ultimate intensity of the fluorescence was attained for ARP and CLZ utilizing borate buffer at pH 9 and 10, respectively. After which, the intensity dropped due to excessive background intensity ( Figure 2). Furthermore, a test of the buffer volume revealed that reaction mixtures were accomplished to 10 mL with borate buffer.

Influence of O-Phthalaldehyde Volume
The effect of o-phthalaldehyde volume was investigated by introducing varied volumes of 0.1% (w/v) reagent solution. The volumes were varied from 0.2 to 3.0 mL. Maximum intensities were observed to be at 1.5 and 0.6 mL with ARP and CLZ, respectively ( Figure 3), after which the intensity gradually decreased.

Influence of O-Phthalaldehyde Volume
The effect of o-phthalaldehyde volume was investigated by introducing var umes of 0.1% (w/v) reagent solution. The volumes were varied from 0.2 to 3.0 m mum intensities were observed to be at 1.5 and 0.6 mL with ARP and CLZ, resp (Figure 3), after which the intensity gradually decreased.

Influence of β-Mercaptoethanol Volume
The effect of volume on β-mercaptoethanol was investigated using varied qu of 1.0% (v/v) reagent solution. It was shown that developing the reagent volume r a corresponding rise in the intensity of the fluorescence of the product up to 1.0 mL 4). However, volume more than 1.0 mL caused a decline in fluorescence. As a re mL of 1.0% β-mercaptoethanol solution was selected as the best reagent volume bilize the reaction product of ARP and CLZ with o-phthalaldehyde, β-mercapto was added.

Influence of Reaction Time
The required time for a successful derivatization process was investigated. It noting that, raising the process time led to a progressive raising in the intensit fluorescence of the product up to 40 min, after that it remained unchanged. As leaving the reaction mixture to settle for 40 ± 5 min is sufficient for the greatest i ( Figure 5).

Influence of β-Mercaptoethanol Volume
The effect of volume on β-mercaptoethanol was investigated using varied quantities of 1.0% (v/v) reagent solution. It was shown that developing the reagent volume results in a corresponding rise in the intensity of the fluorescence of the product up to 1.0 mL ( Figure 4). However, volume more than 1.0 mL caused a decline in fluorescence. As a result, 1.0 mL of 1.0% β-mercaptoethanol solution was selected as the best reagent volume. To

Influence of Reaction Time
The required time for a successful derivatization process was investigated. It is worth noting that, raising the process time led to a progressive raising in the intensity of the fluorescence of the product up to 40 min, after that it remained unchanged. As a result, leaving the reaction mixture to settle for 40 ± 5 min is sufficient for the greatest intensity ( Figure 5).

Impact of Temperature
The impact of various different temperatures with a constant heating time was studied. Notably, raising the temperature caused a steady decline in the intensity of the fluorescence of the product obtained. As a consequence, the process was carried out at ambient temperature. In terms of durability, the generated compound was shown to be durable over a 2 h period.

Linearity and Range
The regression plot revealed a linear correlation of intensity of the fluorescence on the drug concentration over the spectrum shown in Figure 6. The following equations resulted from a linear regression assessment of the data: where F denotes the intensity, R the regression coefficient, and C the drug concentration (µg/mL).

Impact of Temperature
The impact of various different temperatures with a constant heating time w ied. Notably, raising the temperature caused a steady decline in the intensity of rescence of the product obtained. As a consequence, the process was carried out ent temperature. In terms of durability, the generated compound was shown to b over a 2 h period.

Linearity and Range
The regression plot revealed a linear correlation of intensity of the fluores the drug concentration over the spectrum shown in Figure 6. The following e resulted from a linear regression assessment of the data:

Detection Limit
The proposed method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guidance Documents testing [41]. The limit of detection (LOD) (0.0391 and 0.0400 μg/mL) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) (0.1035 and 0.1332 μg/mL) were determined for ARP and CLZ, respectively (Table 1).

Detection Limit
The proposed method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guidance Documents testing [41]. The limit of detection (LOD) (0.0391 and 0.0400 µg/mL) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) (0.1035 and 0.1332 µg/mL) were determined for ARP and CLZ, respectively (Table 1).

Accuracy and Precision
The suggested approach's precision was estimated on the basis of intermediate precision (intra-day and inter-day). Three varied drug concentrations were examined in five replicates on the same day (intra-day precision) and for seven days in a row (inter-day precision). Tables 2 and 3 describe the analytical findings from the examination. The accuracy was reported as a relative error percentage (Er %), and intra-day and inter-day reliability were estimated as relative standard deviations (RSD %). The suggested approach's level of precision was appropriate for the quality assurance assessment of the drugs under consideration.

Tablets Analysis
The suggested approach was utilized to measure the drug content in the tablets. The acquired findings obtained were sufficiently precise and accurate, as evidenced by the good recovery percentage and the RSD % below 4.5% (Table 4).

Instrumentation
Fluorescence intensities were measured using a Shimadzu RF-5301 PC spectrofluorimeter (Kyoto, Japan) outfitted with a xenon lamp (150 W) and 1 cm quartz cells. Slits of 5 mm were used to fix the excitation and emission monochromators. For heating, an electrical thermostatic water bath with a temperature range of 35-100 • C was utilized. The pH values of the buffer solutions were measured using the Jenway instrument pH-meter (combined electrode).

Reagents Preparation
All of the reagents utilized were of analytical grade and applied as obtained. i.
Stock solutions preparation: Pharmaceutical grade ARP and CLZ confirmed to be 99.85% pure was obtained as a gift, kindly supplied from the Egyptian International Pharmaceutical Industries Company (EIPICo), Egypt. Separate pure ARP and CLZ stock solutions were developed by dissolution 10 mg of each medication in concentrated H 2 SO 4 (1.0 mL) followed by completion to 100 mL of purified water. ii.
Calculated amounts of 0.2 M boric acid and 0.2 M NaOH were used to prepare a borate buffer solution to adjust the pH to 9.0, 10 with a pH meter.

Recommendations for General Processes
ARP and CLZ solution with drug concentrations of 0.1-0.5 µg/mL were added to a set of 10 mL volumetric flasks, followed by 1.5 mL and 0.6 mL of 0.1% (w/v) o-phthalaldehyde for both ARP and CLZ, respectively. Afterward, 0.8 mL and 1.0 mL of β-mercaptoethanol 1.0% (v/v) was introduced to each flask and thoroughly mixed. The reaction mixtures were kept at ambient temperature for 45 min before the volumes were completed to the mark using pH 9 and pH 10 borate buffers for ARP and CLZ, respectively. The fluorescence of the obtained solutions was estimated at 450 nm following excitation at 340 nm in comparison to a blank solution made in the same way, except the drugs' addition. The calibration curve was created by plotting the fluorescence intensity against the final medication concentrations (µg/mL).

Tablet Procedure
At least 10 tablets of the medications were ground and well combined in a small dish. Then, 10 mg ARP and CLZ were solubilized with conc. H 2 SO 4 (1.0 mL) in distilled water, followed by filtration into a volumetric flask (100 mL), and then diluted with water. Various