UniPR1331: Small Eph/Ephrin Antagonist Beneficial in Intestinal Inflammation by Interfering with Type-B Signaling

Eph receptors, comprising A and B classes, interact with cell-bound ephrins generating bidirectional signaling. Although mainly related to carcinogenesis and organogenesis, the role of Eph/ephrin system in inflammation is growingly acknowledged. Recently, we showed that EphA/ephrin-A proteins can modulate the acute inflammatory responses induced by mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion, while beneficial effects were granted by EphB4, acting as EphB/ephrin-B antagonist, in a murine model of Crohn’s disease (CD). Accordingly, we now aim to evaluate the effects of UniPR1331, a pan-Eph/ephrin antagonist, in TNBS-induced colitis and to ascertain whether UniPR1331 effects can be attributed to A- or B-type signaling interference. The potential anti-inflammatory action of UniPR1331 was compared to those of the recombinant proteins EphA2, a purported EphA/ephrin-A antagonist, and of ephrin-A1-Fc and EphA2-Fc, supposedly activating forward and reverse EphA/ephrin-A signaling, in murine TNBS-induced colitis and in stimulated cultured mononuclear splenocytes. UniPR1331 antagonized the inflammatory responses both in vivo, mimicking EphB4 protection, and in vitro; EphA/ephrin-A proteins were inactive or only weakly effective. Our findings represent a further proof-of-concept that blockade of EphB/ephrin-B signaling is a promising pharmacological strategy for CD management and highlight UniPR1331 as a novel drug candidate, seemingly working through the modulation of immune responses.


Introduction
Eph (erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma) receptors belong to the largest family of tyrosine kinases receptors (RTKs): they are divided into A-(EphA1-8, 10) and B-classes (EphB1-4, 6), according to structural features and binding affinities for their ligands, the cell-surface bound ephrins (Eph receptor interacting proteins) [1]. Ephephrin interactions occur at cell-cell contact sites, generating a bidirectional signaling that affects both the Eph and the ephrin-bearing cells [2]: they play key roles in cell survival, proliferation, and migration and affect embryonic growth and cancer development and progression [3].
The widespread expression of both A-and B-type Eph/ephrin proteins on epithelial, endothelial and blood cells has also progressively attracted the interest of the scientific community, making them intriguing targets to tune the inflammatory responses [4,5]. Recently, our group has also focused attention on the involvement of the Eph/ephrin system in the control of acute and subacute inflammatory processes in the gut; we demonstrated that EphA/ephrin-A proteins take part in the local and remote injuries induced by mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion, an acute inflammatory condition, which is characterized by microvascular dysfunctions and by the loss of mucosal barrier integrity [6]. Conversely, type B Eph/ephrin proteins seemingly participate in the modulation of the immune responses activated in trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis [7], a conventional model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with a major Th1 component.
Our interest in the Eph/ephrin system has been further boosted by the design and synthesis of UniPR1331, a small molecule developed from the chemical manipulation of litho-colic acid. This molecule acts as a potent Eph/ephrin antagonist endowed with good oral bioavailability, a pharmacokinetic property considered particularly favorable for a drug, thanks to the high compliance the oral route has in patients [8]. Accordingly, given the beneficial effects afforded by the blockade of EphB/ephrin-B signaling by monomeric EphB4 in murine TNBS-induced colitis [7], our current aim is to investigate the effects produced by UniPR1331 in the same experimental model, where the involvement of EphA/ephrin-A system is still unknown. Since the protein-protein inhibitor displays similar affinity toward type A and type B proteins, the responses evoked by UniPR1331 will be compared not only to those induced by monomeric EphB4 [7], but also to those evoked by the administration of the soluble monomeric EphA2 that, devoid of the Fc fragment, presumably interferes with EphA/ephrin-A signaling, behaving as an antagonist. The assessment of the changes induced by UniPR1331 and EphA2 on mRNA levels of EphA2 and ephrin-A1 in colitis will contribute to further enrich the scenario.
Finally, in order to better understand the role of type A proteins in intestinal inflammation, the local and systemic effects of ephrin-A1-Fc and EphA2-Fc will also be investigated both in vitro and in vivo. In fact, these recombinant chimeric proteins supposedly activate forward and reverse signaling, respectively, and in turn block the complementary signaling pathways.
On the whole, the collected results will help to clarify the targets specifically responsible for UniPR1331-mediated effects and to ascertain whether the simultaneous blockade of both Eph/ephrin signaling pathways may offer some advantages over specific interference with one of them.

UniPR1331 Counteracted TNBS-Induced Severe Inflammatory Response
Following the development of intestinal inflammation, control (CNT) group showed a significantly higher value of the disease activity index (DAI), a parameter estimating the severity of colitis, an exacerbated mucosal injury, and exhibited a marked shortening and thickening of the colon compared to sham (S) mice not exposed to TNBS ( Figure 1A-D). Instillation of the haptenating agent also provoked massive infiltration of neutrophils in the colon and in the lungs, witnessed by increased myeloperoxidase activity (MPO) in both tissues ( Figure 1E-F). Treatment with UniPR1331 was able to significantly improve mice general health conditions, to dampen the mucosal damage and to attenuate the TNBS-induce neutrophil recruitment at the highest tested dose, an effect confirmed also by its ability to mitigate, although not significantly, IL-1β production in the colon ( Figure 2). Similar local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects were evoked by the conventional anti-IBD drug sulfasalazine ( Figure 1).
When the histological analysis of colon tissues was performed, the Eph/ephrin antagonist did not affect the extensive mucosal necrosis and the considerable granulocytes infiltration present both in the lamina propria and in the submucosa of TNBS-exposed mice ( Figure 3).

UniPR1331 Reverted TNBS-Induced Changes in T Cells Profile
Instillation of the haptenating agent promoted the egress of CD4+ T lymphocytes from the spleen and MLNs, as demonstrated by the reduction of their percentage and of CD4+/CD8+ ratio in both lymphoid tissues of CNT mice compared to S mice. At the highest tested dose, UniPR1331 was able to fully counteract the induced changes, Figure 1. Effects of UniPR1331 on TNBS-induced inflammatory responses. Disease Activity Index (A), macroscopic score (MS) (B), colonic length (C), colonic thickness (D), colonic myeloperoxidase (MPO) (E) and lung MPO (F) activity assessed in vehicle-treated normal mice (S) and in TNBStreated mice administered with vehicle (CNT), UniPR1331 10 mg/kg (Uni10), UniPR1331 25 mg/kg (Uni25), and sulfasalazine 50 mg/kg (Sfz) (n = 5-15 independent values per group). * p < 0.05 vs. S mice; # p < 0.05 vs. CNT mice; one-way or two-way (DAI) ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest; Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's post-test (MS).     When the histological analysis of colon tissues was performed, the Eph/ephrin antagonist did not affect the extensive mucosal necrosis and the considerable granulocytes infiltration present both in the lamina propria and in the submucosa of TNBS-exposed mice ( Figure 3).

UniPR1331 Reverted TNBS-Induced Changes in T Cells Profile
Instillation of the haptenating agent promoted the egress of CD4+ T lymphocytes from the spleen and MLNs, as demonstrated by the reduction of their percentage and of CD4+/CD8+ ratio in both lymphoid tissues of CNT mice compared to S mice. At the highest tested dose, UniPR1331 was able to fully counteract the induced changes, particularly in the spleen, while a weaker, not remarkable effect was detected in MLNs, similar to the one evoked by sulfasalazine ( Figure 4).

Treatment with UniPR1331 Did Not Influence Colonic Eph/ephrin Gene Expression
As regards colonic Eph/ephrin gene expression, TNBS application did not change the levels of mRNA transcripts of EphA2 and ephrin-A1, since single bands of similar intensity were detected in colonic tissues of S and CNT mice; neither the treatment with UniPR1331 at 25 mg/kg nor that with the recombinant protein EphA2 affected EphA2 or ephrin-A1 gene transcription ( Figure 5).
In the case of EphB4 mRNA also, whose levels, along with those of ephrin-B2, had been already presented for S, CNT and EphB4-treated mice by Grandi, Zini et al. [7], neither the instillation of the haptenating agent nor that of UniPR1331 modified their production with respect to S tissues ( Figure 6A,C). Concerning ephrin-B2 gene expression, the instillation of TNBS promoted the appearance of an additional mRNA band, corresponding to a splice variant of ephrin-B2 gene, with similar intensity in vehicle-treated and in UniPR1331treated mice ( Figure 6B,D).

UniPR1331 Dampened TNFα Release from Splenic Mononuclear Cells
The effects of UniPR1331 were investigated also in vitro on the viability of splenic mononuclear cells and on their activation by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin. The viability of lymphocytes was assessed by propidium iodide exclusion assay and revealed that the exposure to the Eph/ephrin antagonist up to 30 µM preserved more than 90% cell viability, a result comparable to the one obtained in basal conditions, after exposure to the vehicle (Table 1).  CNT mice, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test.

Treatment with UniPR1331 Did Not Influence Colonic Eph/ephrin Gene Expression
As regards colonic Eph/ephrin gene expression, TNBS application did not change the levels of mRNA transcripts of EphA2 and ephrin-A1, since single bands of similar intensity were detected in colonic tissues of S and CNT mice; neither the treatment with UniPR1331 at 25 mg/kg nor that with the recombinant protein EphA2 affected EphA2 or In the case of EphB4 mRNA also, whose levels, along with those of ephrin-B2, had been already presented for S, CNT and EphB4-treated mice by Grandi, Zini et al. [7], neither the instillation of the haptenating agent nor that of UniPR1331 modified their production with respect to S tissues ( Figure 6A,C). Concerning ephrin-B2 gene expression, the instillation of TNBS promoted the appearance of an additional mRNA band, corresponding to a splice variant of ephrin-B2 gene, with similar intensity in vehicle-treated and in UniPR1331-treated mice ( Figure 6B,D).   In the case of EphB4 mRNA also, whose levels, along with those of ephrin-B2, had been already presented for S, CNT and EphB4-treated mice by Grandi, Zini et al. [7], neither the instillation of the haptenating agent nor that of UniPR1331 modified their production with respect to S tissues ( Figure 6A,C). Concerning ephrin-B2 gene expression, the instillation of TNBS promoted the appearance of an additional mRNA band, corresponding to a splice variant of ephrin-B2 gene, with similar intensity in vehicle-treated and in UniPR1331-treated mice ( Figure 6B,D).  The stimulation by PMA and ionomycin of mononuclear cells evoked a significant release of TNF-α in the cell culture media; following the exposure to increasing concentrations of UniPR1331, the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine by immune cells

EphA2 Did Not Affect the In Vitro and In Vivo Inflammatory Responses
Given the ability of UniPR1331 to block both EphA and EphB receptors, the effects o monomeric EphA2, supposedly interfering with EphA/ephrin-A signaling, as EphB4 doe with EphB/ephrin-B pathways, were tested in the same experimental models in vitro an in vivo. Indeed, when applied at 1μg/mL, a concentration devoid of effects on lympho cytes viability (Table 1) and 10 times higher than that of EphB4 able to significantly in crease the cytokine production [7], EphA2 was not able to modify the TNFα release b splenic mononuclear cells ( Figure 7B). In vivo, the administration of EphA2 was ineffec tive in counteracting the inflammatory responses induced by TNBS instillation at th equimolar dose of EphB4 ( Figure 8 and Table 2), nor did it modify EphA2 and ephrin-A genes transcription in the inflamed colon ( Figure 5).

Ephrin-A1-Fc Evoked Weak Protective Effects against TNBS-Induced Inflammation
In order to proceed with the investigation on the role of the EphA/ephrin-A system in intestinal inflammation, we tested the effects of the recombinant proteins in TNBS-in duced colitis. The activation of reverse signaling by EphA2-Fc was devoid of remarkabl anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 8), while the treatment with ephrin-A1-Fc significantl

EphA2 Did Not Affect the In Vitro and In Vivo Inflammatory Responses
Given the ability of UniPR1331 to block both EphA and EphB receptors, the effects of monomeric EphA2, supposedly interfering with EphA/ephrin-A signaling, as EphB4 does with EphB/ephrin-B pathways, were tested in the same experimental models in vitro and in vivo. Indeed, when applied at 1µg/mL, a concentration devoid of effects on lymphocytes viability (Table 1) and 10 times higher than that of EphB4 able to significantly increase the cytokine production [7], EphA2 was not able to modify the TNFα release by splenic mononuclear cells ( Figure 7B). In vivo, the administration of EphA2 was ineffective in counteracting the inflammatory responses induced by TNBS instillation at the equimolar dose of EphB4 ( Figure 8 and Table 2), nor did it modify EphA2 and ephrin-A1 genes transcription in the inflamed colon ( Figure 5).

Ephrin-A1-Fc Evoked Weak Protective Effects against TNBS-Induced Inflammation
In order to proceed with the investigation on the role of the EphA/ephrin-A system in intestinal inflammation, we tested the effects of the recombinant proteins in TNBS- induced colitis. The activation of reverse signaling by EphA2-Fc was devoid of remarkable anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 8), while the treatment with ephrin-A1-Fc significantly improved mice general conditions ( Figure 8A). Accordingly, we decided also to test a higher dose of the recombinant protein: the results are presented in Figure S1 and confirmed the beneficial action of both doses of ephrin-A1-Fc on mice health status and the ability of the higher dose to attenuate, although not significantly, the colonic mucosal lesions and the recruitment of neutrophils in the colon and in the lungs. The altered profile of splenic and MLN T cells after TNBS instillation was not modified by the pharmacological modulation of the EphA/ephrin-A system ( Table 2). To complete the picture, the effects of ephrin-A1-Fc and EphA2-Fc were tested also on the activation of splenic mononuclear cells and revealed that both were able to dampen the release of TNFα by about 30% at concentrations not affecting the cells' viability ( Figure 7C and Table 1).
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 502 9 of 18 ability of the higher dose to attenuate, although not significantly, the colonic mucosal lesions and the recruitment of neutrophils in the colon and in the lungs. The altered profile of splenic and MLN T cells after TNBS instillation was not modified by the pharmacological modulation of the EphA/ephrin-A system ( Table 2). To complete the picture, the effects of ephrin-A1-Fc and EphA2-Fc were tested also on the activation of splenic mononuclear cells and revealed that both were able to dampen the release of TNFα by about 30% at concentrations not affecting the cells' viability ( Figure 7C and Table 1).

Discussion
Following a line of research begun a few years ago, the main aim of the present study was to investigate the effects exerted by the pharmacological modulation of the Eph/ephrin system in subacute intestinal inflammation. By applying two different models of experimental colitis, we demonstrated that the blockade of the EphB/ephrin-B system could provide beneficial effects against the gut inflammation mainly elicited by Th1mediated immune responses (TNBS-induced colitis), while being essentially devoid of effects against the colitis usually ascribed to innate mechanisms (DSS-induced colitis) [7]. These findings and the availability of UniPR1331, a pan-Eph/ephrin antagonist, endowed with high potency and advantageous pharmacokinetic features [8], tailored the main premises of the present work. In particular, the ability of UniPR1331 to efficaciously interfere with Eph/ephrin signaling pathways in vitro [8] prompted us to assess its in vitro and in vivo effects and to compare them with the effects induced by the administration of monomeric EphA2: like EphB4, monomeric EphA2 is devoid of the Fc fragment and presumably interferes with EphA/ephrin-A signaling, behaving as an antagonist.
The collected results showed that UniPR1331 displayed a remarkable anti-inflammatory action in vivo, significantly improving mice health status, reducing colonic macroscopic damage and structural alterations and counteracting local and lung neutrophil infiltration. These effects closely resemble those of sulfasalazine, conventional anti-IBD agent endowed with pronounced anti-flogistic local actions; moreover, given the oral bioavailability of UniPR1331, we can speculate that its beneficial effects probably ensue also from of its systemic absorption. Finally, the ability of UniPR1331 to counteract also the changes induced by the haptenating agent on splenic T cells profile, at variance with sulfasalazine, which is ineffective in this respect, suggests that the protection afforded by the Eph/ephrin antagonist also unfolds through the modulation of adaptive immune responses. Particularly relevant is the fact that the in vivo actions of UniPR1331 are perfectly mimicked by EphB4 and strikingly oppose the lack of activity demonstrated by equimolar EphA2.
We could also notice that the flogistic process triggered by TNBS apparently did not affect the transcription of EphA2 and ephrin-A1 genes in mice colon: this result differs from our previous observations of an alternative ephrin-B2 gene variant promoted by the intestinal inflammation in the same experimental model [7], observations in their turn consistent with the up-regulation of ephrin-B2 mRNA in the mucosal lesions of CD patients [9]. In the case of the shorter variant of ephrin-B2 gene, whose appearance is elicited by the inflammatory environment and not modified by the treatment with the small molecule, the effect of UniPR1331 also overlapped with that of EphB4. As already discussed for the recombinant protein [7], it is probable that the anti-inflammatory actions exhibited by EphB antagonists rely on down-stream factors not directly involved in the transcriptional regulation of ephrin-B2 gene. As regards A-type signaling pathway, the collected results suggest, otherwise, that it has a minor involvement in colitis pathogenesis, Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 502 10 of 16 although the expression of EphA/ephrin-A proteins was documented in basal conditions in the human colonic crypts and tops [10].
These findings give us enough confidence to conclude that the in vivo activity of UniPR1331 in TNBS-induced colitis could be attributed to the blockade of endogenous EphB/ephrin-B signaling, while the interference with A-type pathway as a possible mechanism of action might be presumably ruled out.
Given the key role of the immune cells in the pathogenesis of IBD and of TNBS-induced colitis and the ability of UniPR1331 to restore the profile of splenic T cell subpopulations, UniPR1331 effects were investigated also on TNFα release by stimulated mononuclear splenocytes and, surprisingly, the behaviour of the small molecule stood out from that of both monomeric proteins. In fact, UniPR1331 was able to depress the production of the inflammatory cytokine in a concentration-dependent manner and, in so doing, differed both from EphA2, devoid of any effect, and from EphB4, able to potentiate immune cells activation and TNFα production [7]. If, on a mechanistic point of view, the in vitro data further supported the anti-inflammatory action exerted in vivo by UniPR1331, its molecular target remained elusive. Indeed, on the basis of the gathered data, the effects on immune cells seem to be not directly mediated by the interference with the Eph/ephrin signaling system, raising the possibility that an additional binding site is involved. The selectivity of UniPR1331 had already been deeply investigated and the interaction with various targets of steroidal derivatives, like TGR5 and PXR [8], or with targets promoting cell proliferation or angiogenesis [11] had been excluded up to the concentration of 10 µM. However, a quite intriguing aspect is the documented ability of lithocholic acid, prototypical compound from which UniPR1331 stemmed, to interfere with adaptive immune responses: in particular, lithocholic acid was reported to hamper Th1 differentiation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Jurkat T cells and human/mouse CD4 + T cells [12,13]. Although unlikely, given the differences existing in the structure of the rigid core between the bile acid and the cholenic derivative UniPR1331, it is appealing to hypothesize that the anti-inflammatory action of UniPR1331 may ensue both from EphB/ephrin-B blockade and from the contribution of a component related to lithocholic acid.
Further exploring the participation of EphA/ephrin-A proteins in TNBS-induced colitis, despite the fact that the blockade of this signaling pathway appeared irrelevant in colitis responses, the stimulation of both forward and reverse A-signaling was able to mitigate the production of TNFα by mononuclear splenocytes. This effect disclosed a possible addition of these pathways to the modulation of inflammation. Indeed, we could observe that the in vivo exogenous activation of EphA2 forward signaling by ephrin-A1-Fc was effective in improving mice health status and in slightly attenuating the recruitment of neutrophils in local and remote tissues in colitis, effects recalling the protective action displayed by ephrin-A1-Fc in mesenteric I/R [6]. On its turn, ephrin-A1 reverse signaling by EphA2-Fc seemed to mitigate the extracellular matrix deposition elicited in the colon by the subacute inflammatory responses. Provided that the effects on TNFα release by isolated mononuclear splenocytes are not necessarily suggestive of an in vivo impact, these findings allow us to speculate that the moderate protection given by exogenous unidirectional activation of EphA/ephrin-A signaling may depend also on limiting the responses of immune cells, subsequently attenuating the release of inflammatory cytokines. This action could contribute to hamper the enrolment of neutrophils and also to mitigate the triggered pro-fibrotic responses in TNBS-induced colitis, although, up to now, the available literature on the subject is quite scanty.
In conclusion, UniPR1331 emerged as a very promising small molecule Eph/ephrin antagonist, able to exert relevant benefits after oral dosing in a model of intestinal inflammation mainly driven by Th1 responses: the ability to potently interfere with EphB/ephrin-B signaling appears as a key factor and adds to the already described remarkable anticancer properties of the molecule [11]. Future studies will be pivotal to achieve a more in-depth picture of the beneficial actions of UniPR1331 and of its potential therapeutic applications in diseases where inflammation and tumorigenesis are involved.

Animals
C57BL/6 mice (8-12 weeks old) (Charles River Laboratories, Calco, Italy), weighing 20-24 g, were housed five per cage in identical conditions for at least seven days before experiments started. They were maintained under standard conditions at our animal facility (12:12 h light-dark cycle, 22-24 • C, food and water available ad libitum). All the experimental procedures and the suppression by CO 2 inhalation were performed between 9 a.m. and 12 a.m. All appropriate measures were taken to minimize pain or discomfort of animals. Animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines for the use and care of laboratory animals and they were authorized by the local Animal Care Committee "Organismo Preposto al Benessere degli Animali" and by Italian Ministry of Health "Ministero della Salute" (Authorization n. 826/2018-PR).

Induction of Colitis
Intrarectal (i.r.) instillation of 50 µL of a 10% (w/v) TNBS solution in 50% ethanol was performed through insertion of a 10-cm long PE-50 tubing attached to a tuberculin syringe 3 cm into the anus of mice. Inoculated mice were kept in a vertical head-down position for 3 min to avoid leakage of the haptenating agent.

Experimental Design
Pharmacological treatments started 8 h after the induction of colitis and were applied once or twice daily (UniPR1331), 8 h apart, during the following two days, by subcutaneous (s.c.) (recombinant proteins) or per os (p.o.) (UniPR1331 and sulfasalazine) administration. Animals were suppressed by CO 2 inhalation three days after TNBS or saline instillation.
The applied doses of EphA/ephrinA recombinant proteins were equimolar to EphB/ephrinB proteins administered in a previous investigation [7], the dosage of UniPR1331 was chosen on the basis of Festuccia et al., 2018 [11], and the dose of sulfasalazine was chosen according to Grandi et al., 2017 [14]. The study was performed using experimental blocks composed by 10 or 12 mice that were randomly assigned to four or five groups of treatment (S and CNT were present in each experimental block), each one encompassing two animals.
Due to possible seasonal variability, S and CNT mice were repeated periodically all through the study in order to verify the attainment of a constant degree of colitis severity with respect to physiological conditions, thus explaining the bigger size of S and CNT experimental groups with respect to the other groups. Accordingly, each group of animals was randomly subdivided in two subgroups: colons excised from each subset were reserved either for histological analysis or for myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity determination and for cytokine assays.

Evaluation of Inflammatory Responses
Disease Activity Index (DAI) was measured daily throughout the experimentation. Immediately after suppression the macroscopic damage of colonic mucosa was assessed as macroscopic score (MS). The wet weight and the length of each colon were measured and the weight/length ratio was considered as disease-related intestinal wall thickening. Colon, lungs, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected for subsequent microscopic, biochemical or flow cytometry analyses.

Colonic Length and Thickness
The length of the colon and its weight were measured to assess deposition of fibrotic material and muscular contraction elicited by colitis induction; weight/length ratio was calculated to assess colon thickness, according to previously published criteria [14].

Colonic and Pulmonary Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity Assay
MPO activity, a marker of granulocytic infiltration within a tissue, was determined according to Ivey's modified method [17]. After being weighed, each colonic or lung sample was homogenized in ice-cold 0.02 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 4.7), containing 0.015 M Na 2 EDTA and 1 µg mL −1 aprotinin, and centrifuged for 20 min at 12,500 RCF at 4 • C. Pellets were re-homogenized in four volumes of ice-cold 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.4) containing 0.5% hexadecylthrimethyl-ammoniumbromide (HTAB) and 1 µg mL −1 aprotinin. Samples were then subjected to three cycles of freezing and thawing and centrifuged for 30 min at 15,500 RCF at 4 • C. Then, 50 µL of the supernatant was allowed to react with 950 µL of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer, containing 1.6 mM tetramethylbenzidine, 0.3 mM H 2 O 2 , 12% dimethyl formamide, 40% Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Each assay was performed in duplicate and the rate of change in absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 690 nm (TECAN Sunrise™ powered by Magellan™ data analysis software, Mannedorf, Switzerland). 1 unit of MPO was defined as the quantity of enzyme degrading 1 µmol of peroxide per minute at 25 • C. Data were normalized with edema values ((wet weight-dry weight)/dry weight) [18] and expressed as U/g of dry weight tissue.

Colonic IL-1β Levels
In colonic samples collected from S mice (n = 6) and TNBS-treated animals administered with saline (n = 10) or UniPR1331 25 mg/kg (n = 7), colonic IL-1β levels were determined using a commercially available ELISA kit (IL-1β Mouse SimpleStep ELISA™ kit, Abcam Biochemicals™, Cambridge, UK). Samples were homogenized for 1 min in 700 µL of extraction buffer in accordance to the manufacturer's protocols. Samples were then centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000 RCF and the supernatant was collected. Total protein concentration was quantified using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Colonic concentrations of IL-1β were determined in duplicate in Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 502 13 of 16 100 µL samples: the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm (TECAN Sunrise™ powered by Magellan™ data analysis software, Mannedorf, Switzerland). The assays sensitivity for IL-1β was 5 pg/mL. Results were expressed as ng/g protein.

Colonic Histology
Colonic samples were harvested from S mice (n = 3) and TNBS-treated animals administered with saline (n = 3) or UniPR1331 25 mg/kg (n = 4), immersion-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. For each sample, at least five transverse 5-µm sections were cut in the distal colon, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and blindly examined in a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse E800). The histological damage was quantified using Bischoff's modified method [19]: the grade of mucosal destruction (0, normal; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) and the degree of leukocytes infiltration in the lamina propria and submucosa (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, pronounced) were scored (maximum total score: 7). The average value of histological score was determined for each colon, pooled with those determined for colons of the other animals in the same experimental group and the median value was calculated.

Isolation of Splenocytes
After suppression, the spleen from mice of the various experimental groups was removed, mechanically dispersed through a 100 µm cell-strainer, and washed with PBS Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 502 14 of 16 containing 0.6 mM EDTA (PBS-EDTA). The cellular suspension was then centrifuged at 1500 RCF for 10 min at 4 • C, the pellet re-suspended in PBS-EDTA, incubated with 2 mL of NH 4 Cl lysis buffer (0.15 M NH 4 Cl, 1 mM KHCO 3 , 0.1 mM EDTA in distilled water) for 5 min, in the dark, to provoke erythrocytes lysis and centrifuged at 1500 RCF for 10 min at 4 • C. Then, pellets were washed with PBS-EDTA and re-suspended in 5 mL cell staining buffer (PBS containing 0.5% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 0.1% sodium azide). Finally, the cellular suspension was stained with fluorescent antibodies [22].

•
Isolation of Mesenteric Lymph Nodes (MLN) After suppression, harvesting of the whole MLN chain located in the mesentery of proximal colon was performed. The explanted tissue was rinsed with PBS, vascular and adipose tissues were removed to isolate MLN, mechanically dispersed through a 100 µm cell-strainer and washed with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) containing 5% FCS. The obtained suspension was centrifuged at 1500 RCF for 10 min at 4 • C, and the pellet was washed with HBSS containing 5% FCS and re-suspended in 3 mL cell staining buffer. Finally, the cellular suspension was stained with fluorescent antibodies.

•
Immunofluorescent Staining Prior to staining with antibodies, 200 µL of cellular suspension was incubated with IgG1-Fc (1 µg/10 6 cells) for 10 min in the dark at 4 • C to block non-specific binding sites for antibodies. The following antibodies were used for fluorescent staining: Phycoerythrin-Cyanine 5 (PE-Cy5) conjugated anti-mouse CD3ε (0.25 µg/10 6 cells, catalog number 15-0031, lot number B226301), Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-mouse CD4 (0.25 µg/ 10 6 cells, catalog number 100406, lot number B210488), PE anti-mouse CD8a (0.25 µg/ 10 6 cells, catalog number 100708, lot number B190687). Cells were incubated with antibodies for 1 h in the dark at 4 • C, washed with PBS to remove excessive antibody and suspended in cell staining buffer to perform flow cytometry analysis. The viability of the cellular suspension was determined through propidium iodide (PI) staining, a membrane impermeable fluorescent dye, excluded by viable cells, that binds to DNA emitting red fluorescence, thus resulting as a suitable marker for dead cells. Cells were incubated with PI 10 µg/mL for 1 min in the dark, at room temperature, and immediately subjected to flow cytometry analysis. Only PI −ve cells were included in the analysis.