Ethanol-Gas-Sensing Performances of Built-in ZrO2/Co3O4 Hybrid Nanostructures

The development of novel nanomaterials as highly efficient gas-sensing materials is envisaged as one of the most important routes in the field of gas-sensing research. However, developing stable, selective, and efficient materials for these purposes is a highly challenging task requiring numerous design attempts. In this work, a ZrO2/Co3O4 composite is reported, for the first time, as a gas-sensing material for the detection of ethanol. The sensitive and selective detection of ethanol gas at 200 °C has been demonstrated for the ZrO2/Co3O4 (0.20 wt%/0.20 wt%)-based sensor. Furthermore, the sensor showed a very low response/recovery time of 56 s and 363 s, respectively, in response to a pulse of 20 ppm of ethanol and good stability. The interesting gas-sensing property of ZrO2/Co3O4 can be ascribed to both the porous structure, which facilitates the interaction between the target gas and the sensing site, and the p–p-junction-induced built-in electric field. These results indicate that the ZrO2/Co3O4 composite can serve as a heterostructured nanomaterial for the detection of ethanol gas.


Introduction
Conductometric gas sensors based on a metal oxide (MOX) sensing layer are simple devices that are able to detect dangerous and toxic gases [1].Their performance depends on the structure of the carefully designed materials used as the sensing layer [2,3].Heterostructured metal oxides such as Co 3 O 4 -decorated Fe 2 O 3 [4], Co 3 O 4 /SnO 2 [5], Y 2 O 3 -doped ZrO 2 , etc., [6] have been reported to display better performances in comparison to pure metal oxides (Co 3 O 4 , CuO, NiO, etc.) [7], such as a high response, high conductivity, and low working temperature.Therefore, designing a heterostructured material is advantageous for improving the gas-sensing performance.For efficient detection, the designed metal oxide nanomaterials should also have well-structured active sites, a large surface area, porosity, and a chemically stable structure [8,9].
Recently, Fe 2 O 3 nanocomposites (FeNCs) [4], NiO-loading Co 3 O 4 NCs [10], and Co 3 O 4 -CuO heterostructures [11] have been used for gas-sensing applications.The combinations of a high surface area, excellent electrical conductivity, and porosity, which facilitates the diffusion of gases, increase the performances of the modified metal oxides [12].In this paper, we investigate, for the first time, the sensing properties of Co 3 O 4 -ZrO 2 heterostructures.ZrO 2 nanoparticles are widely used in catalysis, energy, and environment Sensors 2023, 23, 9578 2 of 13 fields, due to their thermal stability, high specific surface area, and optical and electrical properties [13,14].
However, recently, ZrO 2 nanoparticles have drawn the attention of researchers due to their improved gas-sensing performance [15], especially for designing electrochemical gas sensors.The use of ZrO 2 for electrochemical gas sensors (e.g., as potentiometric YSZ oxygen sensors) is well-known, while very few papers report the use of pure or doped ZrO 2 in conductometric gas sensors.Both of these solid-state sensors offer high sensitivity, are robust, and are suitable for the detection of a wide variety of gases.Moreover, conductometric sensors have a high tolerance to extreme ambient conditions and corrosive environments, making them a choice for monitoring gases in hot, dry climates.
For conductometric gas sensors, pure ZrO 2 has some limitations because of its insulating nature and, therefore, presents a very high resistance, which hinders the measurements in the usual range of sensor's operating temperature.Suitable microstructural modifications, by doping or heterojunction formations, are necessary to improve the electrical characteristics of zirconia for gas-sensing applications [6].
Yan and coworkers reported the detection of NO 2 at room temperature using surfacemicrostructure-controlled ZrO 2 nanoparticles [16].John and coworkers synthesized a metal/metal oxide mixture within a yttria-stabilized zirconia oxygen-conducting ceramic superstructure and found that the material shows interface oxygen at the target application temperature [17].Zeng and coworkers developed a compact yttria-stabilized zirconia NOx sensor with a dual-functional Co 3 O 4 /NiO-sensing electrode [18].Hence, ZrO 2 nanoparticles can be considered as a highly efficient gas-sensing material for a variety of gases.On the other hand, zirconium oxide, as a support material [19], offers striking features, due to its hydrophilic nature.
Based on the above facts, here, we report results based on the exploration of a new Co 3 O 4 -ZrO 2 heterostructure, demonstrating its promising ethanol-sensing ability.The detection of ethanol at low temperatures is top-priority research amongst many scientists and engineers because this dangerous gas can cause depression, leading to sedation, slurred speech, impaired judgment, uninhibited behavior, and euphoria.The detection of ethanol has drawn extensive attention due to ingestion, inhalation, or by skin absorption [20], and hence a suitable sensor is essentially required.A number of metal oxides, noble metals, single-and multi-wall carbon nanotubes, and graphene oxide have been exploited for the detection of ethanol [21,22].The composites of transition metal oxides provide better gas-sensing activity, good selectivity, and a fast response.Therefore, in most cases, materials based upon metal oxides serve as the main transport component for electrode fabrication [23].
In the present work, the sol-gel method is used for the synthesis of cobalt-oxidedecorated zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 -Co 3 O 4 ) nanocomposites and we have exploited the as-prepared heterostructure for the sensitive and selective detection of ethanol.

Synthesis of ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 Junctions
The ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposites were prepared using a two-step procedure.First, pure Co 3 O 4 nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared using the precipitation method.To prepare the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 (0.20/0.20 wt%) nanocomposites (NCs), 0.481 g (0.20 wt%) of Co 3 O 4 NPs Sensors 2023, 23, 9578 3 of 13 powder was dissolved in 5 mL of diluted HNO 3 .To achieve homogeneity, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min using a hotplate.The same procedure was adopted to prepare the solution of ZrO 2 NPs, using 0.246 g (0.20 wt.%) of ZrO 2 NPs dissolved in diluted HNO 3 and stirred for 30 min.When the single homogeneous solutions were ready, we mixed the pristine solutions.A scheme of the synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 1 [24].
Sensors 2023, 23, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 13 prepare the ZrO2/Co3O4 (0.20/0.20 wt%) nanocomposites (NCs), 0.481 g (0.20 wt%) of Co3O4 NPs powder was dissolved in 5 mL of diluted HNO3.To achieve homogeneity, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min using a hotplate.The same procedure was adopted to prepare the solution of ZrO2 NPs, using 0.246 g (0.20 wt.%) of ZrO2 NPs dissolved in diluted HNO3 and stirred for 30 min.When the single homogeneous solutions were ready, we mixed the pristine solutions.A scheme of the synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 1 [24].Subsequently, the beakers containing the as-obtained solution were placed on a hotplate at 300 °C until a gel was obtained.The product was removed from the hotplate after the substance had completely burned.Then, the nanocomposite powder was ground using a mortar and pestle.The result was a blackish powder.

Sample Characterization
The synthesized materials were analyzed using the following techniques: powder Xray diffraction (XRD), Raman and FT-IR spectroscopies, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer.To analyze the surface morphologies and the samples' elemental composition, we used a Zeiss microscope operating at the acceleration voltage of 20 kV.The XRD patterns were recorded with a D2 phaser Bruker X-ray diffractometer using the Cu Kα line (0.159 nm) in the 10-80° 2θ range.Raman spectra were collected using the XploRA micro-Raman setup (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a diode laser emitting at 532 nm.The scattered signal was collected with a 50× focal length objective, dispersed by an 1800 mm/line grating, and collected with a Peltier CCD detector.The measurements were performed at room temperature.The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were acquired with a Perkin Elmer spectrometer equipped with a universal ATR sampling accessory.

Sensor Fabrication and Gas-Sensing Measurements
The solid-state gas sensor device we used was composed of a thick layer of the sensing material deposited on a patterned ceramic substrate [6].The procedure for the sensor fabrication was as follows: First, the powder material was dispersed in deionized water, and then the paste obtained was put on the ceramic substrate made in alumina (3 mm × 6 mm), supplied with interdigitated Pt electrodes and heating elements.Finally, the deposited layer was dried using a hotplate to favor water evaporation, and, to stabilize Subsequently, the beakers containing the as-obtained solution were placed on a hotplate at 300 • C until a gel was obtained.The product was removed from the hotplate after the substance had completely burned.Then, the nanocomposite powder was ground using a mortar and pestle.The result was a blackish powder.

Sample Characterization
The synthesized materials were analyzed using the following techniques: powder Xray diffraction (XRD), Raman and FT-IR spectroscopies, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer.To analyze the surface morphologies and the samples' elemental composition, we used a Zeiss microscope operating at the acceleration voltage of 20 kV.The XRD patterns were recorded with a D2 phaser Bruker X-ray diffractometer using the Cu Kα line (0.159 nm) in the 10-80 • 2θ range.Raman spectra were collected using the XploRA micro-Raman setup (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a diode laser emitting at 532 nm.The scattered signal was collected with a 50× focal length objective, dispersed by an 1800 mm/line grating, and collected with a Peltier CCD detector.The measurements were performed at room temperature.The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were acquired with a Perkin Elmer spectrometer equipped with a universal ATR sampling accessory.

Sensor Fabrication and Gas-Sensing Measurements
The solid-state gas sensor device we used was composed of a thick layer of the sensing material deposited on a patterned ceramic substrate [6].The procedure for the sensor fabrication was as follows: First, the powder material was dispersed in deionized water, and then the paste obtained was put on the ceramic substrate made in alumina (3 mm × 6 mm), supplied with interdigitated Pt electrodes and heating elements.Finally, the deposited layer was dried using a hotplate to favor water evaporation, and, to stabilize the microstructure of the sensing film, a thermal treatment at 400 • C for 2 h was carried out.
A homemade gas-sensing setup was used for the gas-sensing measurements.The measurements were performed under a dry air total stream of 200 sccm, collecting the sensors' resistance data in the four-point mode.The concentration of target gas (ethanol) varied from 10 to 100 ppm.A multimeter data acquisition unit, Agilent 34970A, was used for this purpose, while a dual-channel power supplier instrument, Agilent E3632A (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) gave the input to the sensors and performed the measurements at super-ambient temperatures.
The sensor response, R, was determined as the ratio of Ra (resistance of the gas sensor in dry synthetic air) to Rg (resistance of the injected gas sensor), R = Ra/Rg [4]. the microstructure of the sensing film, a thermal treatment at 400 °C for 2 h was carried out.

Structure and Morphology Studies
A homemade gas-sensing setup was used for the gas-sensing measurements.The measurements were performed under a dry air total stream of 200 sccm, collecting the sensors' resistance data in the four-point mode.The concentration of target gas (ethanol) varied from 10 to 100 ppm.A multimeter data acquisition unit, Agilent 34970A, was used for this purpose, while a dual-channel power supplier instrument, Agilent E3632A (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) gave the input to the sensors and performed the measurements at super-ambient temperatures.
The sensor response, R, was determined as the ratio of Ra (resistance of the gas sensor in dry synthetic air) to Rg (resistance of the injected gas sensor), R = Ra/Rg [4].In fact, as reported in the next section, the gas-sensing performance benefits from the samples' high porosity, large specific surface area, and the remarkable capabilities of surface-adsorbed oxygen.The morphology changes observed in the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite, i.e., an increase in the average sample grain size with respect to the pristine ZrO2 and Co3O4 materials, is likely due to the different synthesis procedures (see Section 2.2.) adopted for the pristine metal oxides and the composite Co3O4/Fe2O3 heterostructure.In fact, as reported in the next section, the gas-sensing performance benefits from the samples' high porosity, large specific surface area, and the remarkable capabilities of surfaceadsorbed oxygen.The morphology changes observed in the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite, i.e., an increase in the average sample grain size with respect to the pristine ZrO 2 and Co 3 O 4 materials, is likely due to the different synthesis procedures (see Section 2.2.) adopted for the pristine metal oxides and the composite Co 3 O 4 /Fe 2 O 3 heterostructure.

Structure and Morphology Studies
On the other hand, the EDX analysis (Figure 2d) confirmed the presence of the atomic Co, O, and Zr species in the structure of the nanocomposite, with the expected ratio, apart from the presence of C and Na, due to preparation residues or ambient contamination.
As shown in Figure 3, the XRD pattern of the pure samples and of the final ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite exhibited the well-developed Bragg diffraction peaks of a typical cubic system (JCPDS No. 74-2120).Specifically, we were able to assign all of the characteristic diffraction  [25] and to the (-111) m, (011) t, and (111) m reflections of the monoclinic (m) and triclinic (t) phases of ZrO 2 (see Figure 3 and JCPDS No. 37-1484 27 [26]).In addition, the application of the Scherrer's equation to the (311) plane diffraction peak yields a crystal size of ~40 nm.The diffraction peaks of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite, occurring at about 2θ = 45 • , 60 • , and 65 • , correspond to the superposition of the reflections from both of the pure samples.
On the other hand, the EDX analysis (Figure 2d) confirmed the presence of the atomic Co, O, and Zr species in the structure of the nanocomposite, with the expected ratio, apart from the presence of C and Na, due to preparation residues or ambient contamination.
As shown in Figure 3, the XRD pattern of the pure samples and of the final ZrO2/Co3O4 composite exhibited the well-developed Bragg diffraction peaks of a typical cubic system (JCPDS No. 74-2120).Specifically, we were able to assign all of the characteristic diffraction peaks of the ZrO2 and Co3O4 nanoparticles.The diffraction pattern of the final ZrO2/Co3O4 composite, indeed, contains some characteristic features of both of the systems.In particular, the peaks in the range of 28° < 2θ < 38° can be ascribed to the (220) and (311) reflections of Co3O4 [25] and to the (-111) m, (011) t, and (111) m reflections of the monoclinic (m) and triclinic (t) phases of ZrO2 (see Figure 3 and JCPDS No. 37-1484 27 [26]).In addition, the application of the Scherrer's equation to the (311) plane diffraction peak yields a crystal size of ~40 nm.The diffraction peaks of the ZrO2/Co3O4 composite, occurring at about 2θ = 45°, 60°, and 65°, correspond to the superposition of the reflections from both of the pure samples.The Raman spectrum of the ZrO2 powder shows vibration bands at about 334, 344, 381, 480, 557, 617, and 632 cm −1 , which are assigned to the monoclinic phase.Meanwhile, the vibration bands at 315, 462, and 642 cm −1 belong to tetragonal phase of ZrO2 [27].The Raman spectrum of the pure Co3O4 powder shows the modes predicted by the group theory for Co3O4, consisting of Eg + 2F1g + F2g + A1g.The Raman mode at 684.5 cm −1 (A1g) is attributed to the characteristics of the octahedral sites, and the Eg and F2g modes are likely related to the combined vibrations of the tetrahedral site and the octahedral oxygen motions.Furthermore, the Raman bands at 470, 510, 608, and 670 cm −1 are assigned to the Co3O4 spinel structure, confirming the XRD data [28].Some of these features can be observed in the Raman spectrum of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite.In addition, the new bands centered at about 520 and 690 cm −1 are likely due to the lattice distortion of the spinel structure induced by the presence of Zr in the Co3O4 matrix (by weaking the Co-O bonds), similarly to those observed in Zr-doped Co3O4 catalysts [29].
The FT-IR spectra of the Co3O4, ZrO2, and ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite samples, collected in the 4000-400 cm −1 range, are shown in Figure 4b.The Co3O4 FT-IR spectrum shows a peak at 560 cm −1 , corresponding to the Co 3+ -O stretching in the octahedral hole, and a peak at 660 cm −1 , ascribed to the stretching vibrations in the Co 2+ -O in the tetrahedral hole, typical of the single-phase face-centered cubic Co3O4 structure [30,31].The band centered at about 1360 cm −1 is ascribed to C-O stretching, while the weak peak centered at about 3400 cm −1 belongs to the OH-stretching modes of the adsorbed water molecules [32].The Raman spectrum of the ZrO 2 powder shows vibration bands at about 334, 344, 381, 480, 557, 617, and 632 cm −1 , which are assigned to the monoclinic phase.Meanwhile, the vibration bands at 315, 462, and 642 cm −1 belong to tetragonal phase of ZrO 2 [27].The Raman spectrum of the pure Co 3 O 4 powder shows the modes predicted by the group theory for Co 3 O 4 , consisting of Eg + 2F1g + F2g + A1g.The Raman mode at 684.5 cm −1 (A1g) is attributed to the characteristics of the octahedral sites, and the Eg and F2g modes are likely related to the combined vibrations of the tetrahedral site and the octahedral oxygen motions.Furthermore, the Raman bands at 470, 510, 608, and 670 cm −1 are assigned to the Co 3 O 4 spinel structure, confirming the XRD data [28].Some of these features can be observed in the Raman spectrum of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite.In addition, the new bands centered at about 520 and 690 cm  [30,31].The band centered at about 1360 cm −1 is ascribed to C-O stretching, while the weak peak centered at about 3400 cm −1 belongs to the OH-stretching modes of the adsorbed water molecules [32].The spectral region at the highest wavenumbers is multiplied by 20 for clarity.The ZrO 2 FT-IR spectrum exhibits the main characteristic bands centered at about 750 cm −1 , 580 cm −1 , and 490 cm −1 , corresponding to the stretching vibration of Zr-O of ZrO 2 [33][34][35].As in the Raman case, some of the FT-IR features of the pure compounds characterize the spectrum of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 sample.The spectral region at the highest wavenumbers is multiplied by 20 for clarity.The ZrO2 FT-IR spectrum exhibits the main characteristic bands centered at about 750 cm −1 , 580 cm −1 , and 490 cm −1 , corresponding to the stretching vibration of Zr-O of ZrO2 [33][34][35].As in the Raman case, some of the FT-IR features of the pure compounds characterize the spectrum of the ZrO2/Co3O4 sample.

Electrical and Gas-Sensing Measurements
The sensing properties of the pure Co3O4, pure ZrO2, and the ZrO2-Co3O4 nanocomposite sensors towards ethanol were investigated here, for the first time, to our knowledge.In order to find the best operating conditions, the sensors were preliminary exposed to 20 ppm of ethanol at different operating temperatures.The operating temperature was monitored and controlled with a heater located at the rear of the ceramic platform that was used as the sensing substrate.The range of temperature investigated was between 50 °C and 300 °C; however, at the lower temperatures, restrictions were imposed by the very high resistance registered.In particular, the ZrO2-based sensor displayed very high resistance values in dry air (e.g., 1.9 × 10 11 ohm at 200 °C and 6.9 × 10 8 ohm at 400 °C).The same findings were displayed by the Co3O4 sensor.
Figure 5a shows the resistance change (response) for the ZrO2/Co3O4-nanocompositebased sensor at temperatures of 50 °C, 80 °C, 100 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C.It is quite common for the response of semiconductor sensors to improve with the increase in the operating temperature, followed by a decrease in response, with a further increase

Electrical and Gas-Sensing Measurements
The sensing properties of the pure Co 3 O 4 , pure ZrO 2 , and the ZrO 2 -Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensors towards ethanol were investigated here, for the first time, to our knowledge.In order to find the best operating conditions, the sensors were preliminary exposed to 20 ppm of ethanol at different operating temperatures.The operating temperature was monitored and controlled with a heater located at the rear of the ceramic platform that was used as the sensing substrate.The range of temperature investigated was between 50 • C and 300 • C; however, at the lower temperatures, restrictions were imposed by the very high resistance registered.In particular, the ZrO 2 -based sensor displayed very high resistance values in dry air (e.g., 1.9 × 10 11 ohm at 200 • C and 6.9 × 10 8 ohm at 400 • C).The same findings were displayed by the Co 3 O 4 sensor.
Figure 5a  It is quite common for the response of semiconductor sensors to improve with the increase in the operating temperature, followed by a decrease in response, with a further increase in temperature, as was observed for the present ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor.This behavior can be attributed to the different thermal activation of the adsorption/reaction/desorption processes, which, together with the charge transfer at the electrode-sensing layer, are essential pathways for the response of the conductometric sensors. in temperature, as was observed for the present ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor.This behavior can be attributed to the different thermal activation of the adsorption/reaction/desorption processes, which, together with the charge transfer at the electrode-sensing layer, are essential pathways for the response of the conductometric sensors.At the optimal temperature of 200 °C, the response of the sensor gradually increased after ethanol injection and then quickly fell back to the initial value, due to the rise in temperature (see Figure 5b).This indicates the fast and reversible response and recovery behavior of the sensor.Furthermore, based on the response observed here to ethanol, a reducing gas, which occurs through an increase in the baseline resistance, a p-type behavior was envisaged.Zirconia has been reported as a semiconductor with a wide band gap energy of ~5.0 eV, both with n-type [36] and p-type behavior [37].Considering that the n-or p-type semiconducting properties of metal oxides are largely dependent on many variables, such as temperature, grain size, the nature of the gas surrounding the sensing material, etc., a deeper analysis is necessary to formulate a more precise hypothesis on the semiconducting characteristics of our ZrO2 and ZrO2-based nanocomposite.
After finding the optimal temperature with the right balance between a higher response and faster dynamics, it was set at 200 °C.Figure 6a shows the transient response of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor to different amounts of ethanol at the optimum temperature of 200 °C.The response of the sensor increased with an increasing ethanol At the optimal temperature of 200 • C, the response of the sensor gradually increased after ethanol injection and then quickly fell back to the initial value, due to the rise in temperature (see Figure 5b).This indicates the fast and reversible response and recovery behavior of the sensor.Furthermore, based on the response observed here to ethanol, a reducing gas, which occurs through an increase in the baseline resistance, a p-type behavior was envisaged.Zirconia has been reported as a semiconductor with a wide band gap energy of ~5.0 eV, both with n-type [36] and p-type behavior [37].Considering that the n-or p-type semiconducting properties of metal oxides are largely dependent on many variables, such as temperature, grain size, the nature of the gas surrounding the sensing material, etc., a deeper analysis is necessary to formulate a more precise hypothesis on the semiconducting characteristics of our ZrO 2 and ZrO 2 -based nanocomposite.
After finding the optimal temperature with the right balance between a higher response and faster dynamics, it was set at 200 • C. Figure 6a shows the transient response of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor to different amounts of ethanol at the optimum temperature of 200 • C. The response of the sensor increased with an increasing ethanol concentration.This could be because more ethanol molecules participate in the surface reaction, which leads to an amplification of the sensor signal.
concentration.This could be because more ethanol molecules participate in the surface reaction, which leads to an amplification of the sensor signal.In Figure 6b, the calibration curve of response (Rg/Ra) vs. ethanol concentration (ppm) is shown.It shows that the increase in the injection of ethanol at a different ppm causes the response to increase continuously.The same tests have been performed with the ZrO2 and Co3O4 sensors.As previously pointed out, the ZrO2 showed a very high resistance, so we were not able to obtain any reliable result in the planned experimental conditions.For the Co3O4 sensor, at the temperature of 200 °C, we registered a signal response to 100 ppm of ethanol, but it was almost negligible (<1.05).The behavior observed in the single ZrO2 and Co3O4 sensors can be ascribed to the high resistance baseline in dry air, which introduces elevated noise and, consequently, low signal stability, which is not suitable for reliable use.In Figure 6b, the calibration curve of response (R g /R a ) vs. ethanol concentration (ppm) is shown.It shows that the increase in the injection of ethanol at a different ppm causes the response to increase continuously.The same tests have been performed with the ZrO 2 and Co 3 O 4 sensors.As previously pointed out, the ZrO 2 showed a very high resistance, so we were not able to obtain any reliable result in the planned experimental conditions.For the Co 3 O 4 sensor, at the temperature of 200 • C, we registered a signal response to 100 ppm of ethanol, but it was almost negligible (<1.05).The behavior observed in the single ZrO 2 and Co 3 O 4 sensors can be ascribed to the high resistance baseline in dry air, which introduces elevated noise and, consequently, low signal stability, which is not suitable for reliable use.
The obtained results demonstrate that the sensor based upon the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite was more sensitive toward ethanol at 200 • C at low concentrations than the sensors based on the simple metal oxides.The limit of detection (LOD) was 4.85 ppm, as calculated from the calibration curve shown in Figure 6b.The obtained results demonstrate that the sensor based upon the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite was more sensitive toward ethanol at 200 °C at low concentrations than the sensors based on the simple metal oxides.The limit of detection (LOD) was 4.85 ppm, as calculated from the calibration curve shown in Figure 6b.
The data in Figure 7 report the response and recovery time of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor for different ethanol concentrations at 200 °C.It can be noticed that the sensor displayed a fast response and recovery.The estimated response time at 20 ppm of ethanol was about 56 s and the recovery time at the same concentration of ethanol was 363 s.To further validate the performance of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor, the selectivity towards the target gas at an operating temperature of 200 °C was investigated.Figure 8 shows the response of the sensor to the gases tested.The response of the sensor to ethanol was higher than that of the other gases (NO2, H2, acetone, and NH3).Table 1 lists the results of the previous literature sensors for ethanol and our composite sensor.Given these results, it can be concluded that the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor has promising properties.Moreover, it compares very well with the previously developed Co3O4 sensor and the NiO/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor oxides derived from the metalorganic-framework-based sensors for ethanol monitoring.To further validate the performance of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor, the selectivity towards the target gas at an operating temperature of 200 • C was investigated.Figure 8 shows the response of the sensor to the gases tested.The response of the sensor to ethanol was higher than that of the other gases (NO 2 , H 2 , acetone, and NH 3 ).Table 1 lists the results of the previous literature sensors for ethanol and our composite sensor.Given these results, it can be concluded that the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor has promising properties.Moreover, it compares very well with the previously developed Co 3 O 4 sensor and the NiO/Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor oxides derived from the metalorganic-framework-based sensors for ethanol monitoring.

Gas-Sensing Mechanism
The sensing data indicated that, differently from the sensors based on single Co 3 O 4 and ZrO 2 metal oxides, in the conditions adopted, the hybrid nanocomposite sensor demonstrated better performances in response to ethanol in the air.To explain this, we should consider first the general aspect of the gas-sensing mechanism in metal oxides and then consider the aspects related to the change in the chemical, physical, and electronic properties of the hybrid ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite.
The interaction of oxygen with the surface of the sensing layer is the predominant factor that influences the sensing mechanism, and this process is temperature-dependent.When the sensor is exposed to air, oxygen molecule species (from O 2 − to O 2− , increasing the temperature) adsorb on the surface.At the temperature of 200 • C, the most predominantly adsorbed oxygen species is O _ .This influences the majority carriers (holes) present in the depletion layer at the grain surface of the p-type semiconductor oxides and, consequently, the resistance baseline.Our results have demonstrated that the composite sensor benefits from this, allowing it to operate at a mild temperature (200 • C).At this temperature, when the composite-based sensor is exposed to ethanol, it adsorbs on the surface of the sensing layer, reacting with the adsorbed oxygen species O _ , causing a decrease in hole concentration and, consequently, an increase in the resistance, as observed (see Figures 5 and 6).
The better response of the hybrid ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanostructure to ethanol compared to the simple oxides can be ascribed to more surface defects that promote gas molecule adsorption and reaction between the adsorbed oxygen species and the target gas.These more active sites come from the electronic interaction between the two p-type metal oxide semiconductors, which create lattice oxygen enrichment and, consequently, boost the reactivity.This hypothesis is supported by our previous research on a p-p type CuO-Co 3 O 4 heterostructure in the detection of NH 3 in the air [43] and by other authors on similar composite systems [44].

Conclusions and Future Perspective
A simple sol-gel method was adopted to synthesize a ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite material.The composition, morphology, and structural properties of this material were investigated using different diagnostic techniques, such as XRD, SEM-EDX, Raman, and FT-IR spectroscopies.The sensor prepared using the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite exhibited a good response at the selected working temperature.Low recovery and response times (56 and 363 s, respectively) were obtained at 20 ppm of ethanol concentration, with the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 sensor, at 200 • C. Furthermore, the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 -based sensor, in the presence of different gases, was highly selective for ethanol.The sensing performance was mainly ascribed to the following factors: (1) the adsorption/desorption of active adsorbed oxygen molecules (e.g., O − and O 2− ) and abundant oxygen vacancies, which increased the number of active sites; (2) the catalytic activity of Co 3+ , which greatly increased the reaction route and decreased the activation energy; and (3) the effective diffusion of gas molecules.Therefore, ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 provides a new material perspective, as well as the engineering of an innovative and low-cost sensing device.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Sol-gel preparation of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite and its characterization step via XRD analysis of the obtained powders.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Sol-gel preparation of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite and its characterization step via XRD analysis of the obtained powders.

Figure
Figure2a-c shows the SEM images for all of the investigated samples.The samples' surfaces are characterized by a highly porous structure.This porosity nature facilitated gas diffusion, thereby enhancing the sensing performances.

Figure
Figure 2a-c shows the SEM images for all of the investigated samples.The samples' surfaces are characterized by a highly porous structure.This porosity nature facilitated gas diffusion, thereby enhancing the sensing performances.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a-c) SEM images for pure Co3O4, pure ZrO2, and the ZrO2/Co3O4 composite; (d) EDX spectrum of the ZrO2/Co3O4 sample and in the inset of the percentage of the atomic species.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a-c) SEM images for pure Co 3 O 4 , pure ZrO 2 , and the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite; (d) EDX spectrum of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 sample and in the inset of the percentage of the atomic species.

Sensors 2023 ,
23, 9578 5 of 13 peaks of the ZrO 2 and Co 3 O 4 nanoparticles.The diffraction pattern of the final ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 composite, indeed, contains some characteristic features of both of the systems.In particular, the peaks in the range of 28 • < 2θ < 38 • can be ascribed to the (220) and (311) reflections of Co 3 O 4
−1 are likely due to the lattice distortion of the spinel structure induced by the presence of Zr in the Co 3 O 4 matrix (by weaking the Co-O bonds), similarly to those observed in Zr-doped Co 3 O 4 catalysts [29].The FT-IR spectra of the Co 3 O 4 , ZrO 2 , and ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite samples, collected in the 4000-400 cm −1 range, are shown in Figure 4b.The Co 3 O 4 FT-IR spectrum shows a peak at 560 cm −1 , corresponding to the Co 3+ -O stretching in the octahedral hole, and a peak at 660 cm −1 , ascribed to the stretching vibrations in the Co 2+ -O in the tetrahedral hole, typical of the single-phase face-centered cubic Co 3 O 4 structure

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) Response at different temperatures of the composite sensor; (b) transient response curve at 200 °C.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) Response at different temperatures of the composite sensor; (b) transient response curve at 200 • C.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Gas-sensing response and (b) calibration curve of the ZrO2/Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor to 200 °C under different ethanol concentrations.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Gas-sensing response and (b) calibration curve of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor to 200 • C under different ethanol concentrations.
Figure 7 report the response and recovery time of the ZrO 2 /Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor for different ethanol concentrations at 200 • C. It can be noticed that the sensor displayed a fast response and recovery.The estimated response time at 20 ppm of ethanol was about 56 s and the recovery time at the same concentration of ethanol was 363 s.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Response (blue) and recovery (red) of the ZrO2-Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor at 200 °C temperature under different ethanol concentrations.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Response (blue) and recovery (red) of the ZrO 2 -Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor at 200 • C temperature under different ethanol concentrations.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Response of the ZrO2-Co3O4 nanocomposite sensor operating at 200 °C under different gases.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Response of the ZrO 2 -Co 3 O 4 nanocomposite sensor operating at 200 • C under different gases.

Table 1 .
Comparison of the previous literature sensors for ethanol with our composite-based sensor.

Table 1 .
Comparison of the previous literature sensors for ethanol with our composite-based sensor.