Drift Suppression of Solution-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors by Cation Doping for Sensing Platforms

Solution-gated graphene field-effect transistors (SG-GFETs) provide an ideal platform for sensing biomolecules owing to their high electron/hole mobilities and 2D nature. However, the transfer curve often drifts in an electrolyte solution during measurements, making it difficult to accurately estimate the analyte concentration. One possible reason for this drift is that p-doping of GFETs is gradually countered by cations in the solution, because the cations can permeate into the polymer residue and/or between graphene and SiO2 substrates. Therefore, we propose doping sufficient cations to counter p-doping of GFETs prior to the measurements. For the pre-treatment, GFETs were immersed in a 15 mM sodium chloride aqueous solution for 25 h. The pretreated GFETs showed that the charge neutrality point (CNP) drifted by less than 3 mV during 1 h of measurement in a phosphate buffer, while the non-treated GFETs showed that the CNP was severely drifted by approximately 50 mV, demonstrating a 96% reduction of the drift by the pre-treatment. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed the accumulation of sodium ions in the GFETs through pre-treatment. Our method is useful for suppressing drift, thus allowing accurate estimation of the target analyte concentration.


Introduction
The demand for sensing analytes in aqueous environments is rapidly increasing in various fields, including life sciences [1], environmental monitoring [2], and food safety [3]. Solution-gated field-effect transistors (SG-FETs), also known as ion-sensitive FETs (ISFETs), are promising candidates with which to meet this demand; thus, they have attracted considerable attention since their invention in the 1970s [4]. In particular, graphene is an ideal channel material owing to its high electron/hole mobilities [5,6] and 2D nature [7,8]. Moreover, substantial efforts have been made to produce chemical vapor deposition (CVD)grown graphene, which makes large-area and high-quality graphene sheets available to everyone [9]. Therefore, solution-gated graphene FETs (SG-GFETs) have achieved considerable high sensitivity, and can be employed for the detection of analytes in solutions, such as ions [10][11][12], proteins [13], viruses [14], and bacteria [15,16]. However, SG-GFETs feature an inherent drawback, known as sensor drift or baseline drift, in ISFETs and SG-GFETs. Some studies have shown that the drift of ISFETs as well as SG-GFETs continue for more than 1 h [17][18][19]. Various models have been proposed and studied extensively to describe the drift in ISFETs, which include the diffusion of ions from electrolyte solutions into the oxide layers [20,21]. However, in most SG-GFETs, the graphene channels directly contact an electrolyte solution, that is, no oxide covers the graphene channels. Therefore, the established theories on ISFETs cannot be applied to SG-GFETs; thus, the drift in GFETs should be studied further. One possible reason for this drift is that the p-doping of GFETs is countered by cations in the solution, since the cations can permeate into the polymer residue and/or between graphene and SiO 2 substrates. Here, we propose a method to suppress the drift, in which sufficient cations are doped to counter the p-doping of GFETs prior to the measurements, as shown in Figure 1. As a pre-treatment, GFETs were immersed in 15 mM sodium chloride (NaCl) aqueous solution for 25 h. The pretreated GFETs showed that the charge neutrality point (CNP) drifted by less than 3 mV during a 1 h measurement in a phosphate buffer. Our method is useful for suppressing drift, which enables the accurate estimation of the concentration of target analytes.
ors 2021, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of channels directly contact an electrolyte solution, that is, no oxide covers the graphe channels. Therefore, the established theories on ISFETs cannot be applied to SG-GFE thus, the drift in GFETs should be studied further. One possible reason for this drift is th the p-doping of GFETs is countered by cations in the solution, since the cations can p meate into the polymer residue and/or between graphene and SiO2 substrates. Here, propose a method to suppress the drift, in which sufficient cations are doped to coun the p-doping of GFETs prior to the measurements, as shown in Figure 1. As a pre-tre ment, GFETs were immersed in 15 mM sodium chloride (NaCl) aqueous solution for h. The pretreated GFETs showed that the charge neutrality point (CNP) drifted by l than 3 mV during a 1 h measurement in a phosphate buffer. Our method is useful suppressing drift, which enables the accurate estimation of the concentration of target a alytes. Graphene is initially p-doped by the effect of PMMA residue and SiO2 substrate. The diffusion of cations, which have ndoping effects to graphene, has a counter-effect on initial p-doping, resulting in CNP drifts.

Materials and Methods
Graphene films were grown on Cu foils using a CVD method. A poly(methyl me acrylate) (PMMA) solution was coated onto the graphene/Cu foils. The Cu foils w etched away using an ammonium persulfate solution. The graphene films were tra ferred onto Si/SiO2 substrates with a thickness of 525 μm/290 nm. A source/drain electro of 10 nm Ti and 90 nm Au was formed using electron-beam physical vapor depositi Graphene channels were formed by oxygen plasma etching. After etching, the PMM coat on the graphene was removed using an organic solvent. Thereafter, the graphene w annealed at 300 °C in an Ar/H2 atmosphere for 1 h to reduce organic residue. Figure 2A shows an optical image of a GFET. The channel length and width were μm and 100 μm, respectively. Multiplex GFETs were fabricated using the same substra A silicone rubber container was attached onto the GFET-array chip to hold an electrol solution ( Figure 2B).
The electrical measurements were conducted as follows: The GFET arrays were i mersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A bias voltage (VDS) of 0.1 was applied between a source/drain electrode, and a top-gate voltage (VGS) was appl through the electrolyte solution using an Ag/AgCl electrode. While sweeping the VGS the positive direction, the drain current (IDS) was measured using a semiconductor para eter analyzer (Keysight Technologies, B1500A). The CNP, where VGS was applied at t minimum IDS in the transfer curve, was calculated using polynomial fitting. We select D-PBS(-) as the electrolyte owing to its suitability for biological applications. Graphene is initially p-doped by the effect of PMMA residue and SiO 2 substrate. The diffusion of cations, which have n-doping effects to graphene, has a counter-effect on initial p-doping, resulting in CNP drifts.

Materials and Methods
Graphene films were grown on Cu foils using a CVD method. A poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solution was coated onto the graphene/Cu foils. The Cu foils were etched away using an ammonium persulfate solution. The graphene films were transferred onto Si/SiO 2 substrates with a thickness of 525 µm/290 nm. A source/drain electrode of 10 nm Ti and 90 nm Au was formed using electron-beam physical vapor deposition. Graphene channels were formed by oxygen plasma etching. After etching, the PMMA coat on the graphene was removed using an organic solvent. Thereafter, the graphene was annealed at 300 • C in an Ar/H 2 atmosphere for 1 h to reduce organic residue. Figure 2A shows an optical image of a GFET. The channel length and width were 10 µm and 100 µm, respectively. Multiplex GFETs were fabricated using the same substrate. A silicone rubber container was attached onto the GFET-array chip to hold an electrolyte solution ( Figure 2B).
The electrical measurements were conducted as follows: The GFET arrays were immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A bias voltage (V DS ) of 0.1 V was applied between a source/drain electrode, and a top-gate voltage (V GS ) was applied through the electrolyte solution using an Ag/AgCl electrode. While sweeping the V GS in the positive direction, the drain current (I DS ) was measured using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keysight Technologies, B1500A). The CNP, where V GS was applied at the minimum I DS in the transfer curve, was calculated using polynomial fitting. We selected D-PBS(-) as the electrolyte owing to its suitability for biological applications.
spot is located at the center of the channel region. The Na1s and C1s peaks were analyzed to assess the cation accumulation and graphene quality, respectively. The baseline was subtracted, and the signal intensity was normalized to the peak area of C1s.  Figure 3A shows the typical transfer curves measured from a chip, where 40 GFETs were integrated. The bold black line in Figure 3A is the calculated average transfer curve. There are three types of variations in electrical characteristics: (i) current variation, (ii) CNP variation, and (iii) transconductance variation. These variations in the transfer curves may be attributed to the graphene tearing, PMMA residue on the graphene, and the impurity charge from the substrate. We previously reported that graphene tearing increases the resistance and decreases the transconductance [22]. It was also reported that both the PMMA residue and SiO2 substrate have a p-doping effect on graphene [23][24][25]. Moreover, water molecules also have a p-doping effect on graphene [26]. Therefore, our GFETs are expected to be p-doped, and it was proven that the observed CNPs were positive, as shown in Figure 3.

Transfer Curve Variability and Drifts of Transfer Curves
We used CNP as a representative feature value for a GFET because the sensing mechanism in GFETs is often demonstrated by the gating effect, which appears as the CNP shift [27]. Each CNP for the transfer curves in Figure 3A was calculated, and a histogram with a Gaussian distribution fit is displayed in Figure 3B. The calculated average and standard deviation of CNPs from 40 GFETs was calculated as 267 ± 21 mV, which are typical values for the initial state of GFETs under the measurement conditions used.
We found that the transfer curve was not stable but rather changed during the measurements. Figure 4 shows that the transfer curves from a specific device changed during the continuous measurements. As can be observed, the CNP, current value, and transconductance changed over time. In this study, we focused on CNP changes as a representative characteristic. Figure 5 shows the time-course change of the calculated CNPs for the same 40 GFETs as in Figure 3 during electric measurements performed in 0.1 × D-PBS(-). The change in the calculated average CNP is also shown by the black bold line. The CNPs shifted by more than 50 mV towards the negative direction after 5 h of measurement. The trend was qualitatively the same among the GFETs, although the shift amounts were slightly different for each. The drift was initially large, but gradually decreased over time. Some reports have shown that when GFETs are used as biosensors or ion sensors, the CNP shift induced by target molecules ranges from a few to hundreds of mV [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the drift of the CNP should be suppressed to less than a few mV to accurately estimate the concentration of analytes. To suppress the CNP drift, we investigated the factors that cause CNP drift. Measurement with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (ULVAC-PHI, Inc. Ver-saProbe) was used to verify the permeation of cations to the GFETs. The measurement spot is located at the center of the channel region. The Na1s and C1s peaks were analyzed to assess the cation accumulation and graphene quality, respectively. The baseline was subtracted, and the signal intensity was normalized to the peak area of C1s. Figure 3A shows the typical transfer curves measured from a chip, where 40 GFETs were integrated. The bold black line in Figure 3A is the calculated average transfer curve. There are three types of variations in electrical characteristics: (i) current variation, (ii) CNP variation, and (iii) transconductance variation. These variations in the transfer curves may be attributed to the graphene tearing, PMMA residue on the graphene, and the impurity charge from the substrate. We previously reported that graphene tearing increases the resistance and decreases the transconductance [22]. It was also reported that both the PMMA residue and SiO 2 substrate have a p-doping effect on graphene [23][24][25]. Moreover, water molecules also have a p-doping effect on graphene [26]. Therefore, our GFETs are expected to be p-doped, and it was proven that the observed CNPs were positive, as shown in Figure 3.    We used CNP as a representative feature value for a GFET because the sensing mechanism in GFETs is often demonstrated by the gating effect, which appears as the CNP shift [27]. Each CNP for the transfer curves in Figure 3A was calculated, and a histogram with a Gaussian distribution fit is displayed in Figure 3B. The calculated average and standard deviation of CNPs from 40 GFETs was calculated as 267 ± 21 mV, which are typical values for the initial state of GFETs under the measurement conditions used.

Transfer Curve Variability and Drifts of Transfer Curves
We found that the transfer curve was not stable but rather changed during the measurements. Figure 4 shows that the transfer curves from a specific device changed during the continuous measurements. As can be observed, the CNP, current value, and transconductance changed over time. In this study, we focused on CNP changes as a representative characteristic.    Figure 5 shows the time-course change of the calculated CNPs for the same 40 GFETs as in Figure 3 during electric measurements performed in 0.1 × D-PBS(-). The change in the calculated average CNP is also shown by the black bold line. The CNPs shifted by more than 50 mV towards the negative direction after 5 h of measurement. The trend was qualitatively the same among the GFETs, although the shift amounts were slightly different for each. The drift was initially large, but gradually decreased over time. Some reports have shown that when GFETs are used as biosensors or ion sensors, the CNP shift induced by target molecules ranges from a few to hundreds of mV [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the drift of the CNP should be suppressed to less than a few mV to accurately estimate the concentration of analytes. To suppress the CNP drift, we investigated the factors that cause CNP drift.

Intermittent Electrical Measurements to Evaluate the Electrical Effects on the CNP Drift
Because the CNP drift was observed during the electrical measurements performed in an electrolyte solution containing D-PBS(-), it was expected that the drift was derived from electrical effects and/or surrounding effects induced by water molecules or ions. To clarify whether the CNP drift was induced by electrical effects, we conducted electrical measurements of the GFETs with a time interval. First, the GFETs were immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-), and then the electrical measurements were conducted for 1 h. Subsequently, the GFETs were left electrically floated for 1.5 h; that is, all the input voltages from the gate and source/drain electrodes were stopped. Thereafter, the measurements were conducted again for 1 h; in the same manner, the GFETs were electrically floated for 1.5 h. Finally, the measurements were performed for 1 h. The average CNP was calculated from the data acquired from several GFETs on the same chip.   Figure 3. The black bolded line shows the calculated average value. Figure 6 shows the time course of the CNP obtained from the intermittent electrical measurements (blue circle). For comparison, the average curve in Figure 5, which was obtained through continuous measurements, also overlapped in Figure 6 (broken line). The results indicate that both plots seem to display the same trend, even though the measurement conditions were different. If the drift was caused by electrical effects alone, the two plots were separated because the effective elapsed time under the electrical measurements was 50% for the intermittent electrical measurement case. Therefore, we concluded that the CNP drifted even without electrical measurements.
Sensors 2021, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW Figure 5. Time-course of the calculated CNPs during electric measurements for the same 4 in Figure 3. The black bolded line shows the calculated average value.

Intermittent Electrical Measurements to Evaluate the Electrical Effects on the CNP D
Because the CNP drift was observed during the electrical measurements per in an electrolyte solution containing D-PBS(-), it was expected that the drift was d from electrical effects and/or surrounding effects induced by water molecules or i clarify whether the CNP drift was induced by electrical effects, we conducted el measurements of the GFETs with a time interval. First, the GFETs were immersed D-PBS(-), and then the electrical measurements were conducted for 1 h. Subsequen GFETs were left electrically floated for 1.5 h; that is, all the input voltages from t and source/drain electrodes were stopped. Thereafter, the measurements were con again for 1 h; in the same manner, the GFETs were electrically floated for 1.5 h. the measurements were performed for 1 h. The average CNP was calculated from t acquired from several GFETs on the same chip. Figure 6 shows the time course of the CNP obtained from the intermittent el measurements (blue circle). For comparison, the average curve in Figure 5, whi obtained through continuous measurements, also overlapped in Figure 6 (broke The results indicate that both plots seem to display the same trend, even though th urement conditions were different. If the drift was caused by electrical effects alo two plots were separated because the effective elapsed time under the electrical m ments was 50% for the intermittent electrical measurement case. Therefore, we con that the CNP drifted even without electrical measurements.

Effects of Pre-Treatments on the CNP Drift
Because the drift was not affected by the electrical effects, we inferred that t trolyte solutions were responsible for the drift. Put simply, the water molecules

Effects of Pre-Treatments on the CNP Drift
Because the drift was not affected by the electrical effects, we inferred that the electrolyte solutions were responsible for the drift. Put simply, the water molecules and/or ions in contact with the graphene were attributed to the drift. As the effect may differ depending on the solution, we immersed the GFETs into two different solutions, with and without ions, prior to the electrical measurements. The experimental procedure is illustrated in Figure 7. The GFETs were first immersed in deionized water or 0.1 × D-PBS(-) for 25 h as pre-treatments. Subsequently, the solution used in the pre-treatments was replaced with 0.1 × D-PBS(-), and electrical measurements were conducted. The results were compared with the initial properties, as shown in Figure 3.  Figure 8A shows typical examples of the transfer curves without pre-treatment, after deionized water immersion, and after electrolyte immersion (0.1 × D-PBS(-)). Figure 8B shows the histograms of the CNPs corresponding to each process. The calculated average and standard deviation of the CNPs from 40 devices for water immersion, electrolyte immersion, and non-treatment were 267 ± 21 mV, 240 ± 17 mV, and 132 ± 11 mV, respectively. Figure 8 indicates that the pre-treatments were effective in suppressing p-doping. It is known that water molecules are slowly intercalated between graphene and substrates [31,32]. This intercalation may potentially weaken the p-doping from the substrate, resulting in slight n-doping by water immersion. Although the effect of water immersion was not certain, the effect of electrolyte immersion was apparent n-doping on the GFETs. The results indicate that the ions were the main n-dopants. Jia et al. demonstrated that ions slowly penetrated between graphene and substrates, and graphene was gradually ndoped over time [33]. This phenomenon should also occur in the proposed system.
Based on these results, we developed a method to suppress CNP drift. If the CNP drift arises from gradual ion penetration, the GFETs, where ions are sufficiently penetrated prior to the measurements, should be stable during long-term electrical measurements. To verify this concept, we evaluated the CNP drift of GFETs immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) for 25 h and compared it with that of the non-treated samples. Figure 9A shows the time course of the average CNP values from the GFETs with and without pre-treatment. As can be observed, for the GFETs with pre-treatment, the CNP values were stable, but these values changed gradually for the GFETs without pre-treatment; this is because, as the CNP changes rapidly, the rate of change decreases over time. We believe that this rate  Figure 8A shows typical examples of the transfer curves without pre-treatment, after deionized water immersion, and after electrolyte immersion (0.1 × D-PBS(-)). Figure 8B shows the histograms of the CNPs corresponding to each process. The calculated average and standard deviation of the CNPs from 40 devices for water immersion, electrolyte immersion, and non-treatment were 267 ± 21 mV, 240 ± 17 mV, and 132 ± 11 mV, respectively. Figure 8 indicates that the pre-treatments were effective in suppressing p-doping. It is known that water molecules are slowly intercalated between graphene and substrates [31,32]. This intercalation may potentially weaken the p-doping from the substrate, resulting in slight n-doping by water immersion. Although the effect of water immersion was not certain, the effect of electrolyte immersion was apparent n-doping on the GFETs. The results indicate that the ions were the main n-dopants. Jia et al. demonstrated that ions slowly penetrated between graphene and substrates, and graphene was gradually n-doped over time [33]. This phenomenon should also occur in the proposed system.
Based on these results, we developed a method to suppress CNP drift. If the CNP drift arises from gradual ion penetration, the GFETs, where ions are sufficiently penetrated prior to the measurements, should be stable during long-term electrical measurements. To verify this concept, we evaluated the CNP drift of GFETs immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) for 25 h and compared it with that of the non-treated samples. Figure 9A shows the time course of the average CNP values from the GFETs with and without pre-treatment. As can be observed, for the GFETs with pre-treatment, the CNP values were stable, but these values changed gradually for the GFETs without pre-treatment; this is because, as the CNP changes rapidly, the rate of change decreases over time. We believe that this rate correlates with that of the ion diffusion into the GFET. As the ions are accumulated in the GFET, the diffusion rate of the ions decreases. As such, the rate of change of CNP is thought to decrease. Figure 9B shows a comparison of the amount of CNP that changed during the first hour. The CNP for the sample without pre-treatment drifted by 49 mV in the first hour. However, the drift was reduced to 2 mV in the pre-treated sample. The results clearly indicate that the electrolyte immersion pre-treatment was effective in suppressing the CNP drift by 96%.

Types of Ions Affecting CNP Drift
Although we demonstrated that pre-immersion in the electrolyte solution su pressed the CNP drift, it still remains unclear which ions in D-PBS(-) account for dr suppression. It is known that cations, including K + , Na + , and Ca 2+ , are adsorbed onto gr phene via cation-π interactions, leading to the same n-doping effect on graphene [33,3

Types of Ions Affecting CNP Drift
Although we demonstrated that pre-immersion in the electrolyte solution su pressed the CNP drift, it still remains unclear which ions in D-PBS(-) account for d suppression. It is known that cations, including K + , Na + , and Ca 2+ , are adsorbed onto g phene via cation-π interactions, leading to the same n-doping effect on graphene [33,3 Therefore, we presumed that the cations in the electrolyte solution may have a signific

Types of Ions Affecting CNP Drift
Although we demonstrated that pre-immersion in the electrolyte solution suppressed the CNP drift, it still remains unclear which ions in D-PBS(-) account for drift suppression. It is known that cations, including K + , Na + , and Ca 2+ , are adsorbed onto graphene via cation-π interactions, leading to the same n-doping effect on graphene [33,34]. Therefore, we presumed that the cations in the electrolyte solution may have a significant impact on the CNP drift. To confirm this effect, we designed an experiment. We prepared GFETs immersed in a 15 mM NaCl aqueous solution for 50 h, which was used as a cationcontaining solution. For comparison, other GFETs were immersed in a 15 mM HCl aqueous solution, which was used as a cation-free solution. After immersion in each solution, the solutions were replaced with 0.1 × D-PBS(-), and the drift characteristics of the CNP were evaluated. Figure 10A shows the CNP drift of the GFET immersed in the NaCl aqueous solution and aqueous HCl solution. Figure 10B shows a comparison of the amount of CNP drift in the first hour. The drift for the GFETs with the HCl aqueous solution immersion was 43 mV, while that with the NaCl solution was 5 mV. As can be observed in Figure 10, the CNP drift was significantly reduced by immersing GFETs in the NaCl aqueous solution, namely the cation-containing solution. Therefore, we concluded that the cations played an important role in suppressing the drift.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis to Verify Cation Accumulation
Based on the effect of pre-treatment on the CNP drift, it was expected that catio would permeate the GFETs. To determine whether cations accumulated around the g phene, an XPS analysis was performed on the graphene before and after immersion in electrolyte solution. Two GFET substrates were prepared as samples for the XPS evalu tion. After the GFETs were fabricated, one substrate was immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) for h, while the other was not. Finally, both substrates were rinsed with deionized water, a the water was blown with N2 gas and removed on a hot plate at 120 °C. Figure 11 shows the XPS analysis results for the Na1s and C1s. Figure 11A shows th the sodium-derived signals were detected only from the GFETs immersed in D-PBS which indicates that the GFETs absorbed cations during the immersion. The relat atomic concentration of Na to Carbon was calculated at 3%, considering the peak area the Na1s and C1s. However, from the XPS analysis, it was difficult to understand wh sodium accumulated because of the low spatial resolution and low intensity of the Na Some reports have shown that water molecules penetrate between graphene and su strates [31,32] and into PMMA resin [35]. Therefore, we expected that sodium would located in these places, together with water molecules, as positively charged sodium io

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis to Verify Cation Accumulation
Based on the effect of pre-treatment on the CNP drift, it was expected that cations would permeate the GFETs. To determine whether cations accumulated around the graphene, an XPS analysis was performed on the graphene before and after immersion in the electrolyte solution. Two GFET substrates were prepared as samples for the XPS evaluation. After the GFETs were fabricated, one substrate was immersed in 0.1× D-PBS(-) for 25 h, while the other was not. Finally, both substrates were rinsed with deionized water, and the water was blown with N 2 gas and removed on a hot plate at 120 • C. Figure 11 shows the XPS analysis results for the Na1s and C1s. Figure 11A shows that the sodium-derived signals were detected only from the GFETs immersed in D-PBS(-), which indicates that the GFETs absorbed cations during the immersion. The relative atomic concentration of Na to Carbon was calculated at 3%, considering the peak area of the Na1s and C1s. However, from the XPS analysis, it was difficult to understand where sodium accumulated because of the low spatial resolution and low intensity of the Na1s. Some reports have shown that water molecules penetrate between graphene and substrates [31,32] and into PMMA resin [35]. Therefore, we expected that sodium would be located in these places, together with water molecules, as positively charged sodium ions may be adsorbed on the negatively charged substrate surface and PMMA.
In addition, cation-π interactions should also facilitate the adsorption of Na + onto the graphene's surface [33,34]. Furthermore, based on the results, Na + as well as other cations, such as K + , should be adsorbed. flow through the graphene, gold electrodes, and electrolytes, which occurs when two different metals are present in an electrolyte solution. The current possibly caused a redox reaction on the graphene surface [37]. Consequently, the graphene may have been partially oxidized. This oxidation of the graphene could also have contributed to the change in the electrical properties, although the transfer curves were not significantly changed by the pre-treatments, aside from the CNP shift.

Conclusion
We developed GFETs and evaluated the changes in their electrical characteristics. The GFETs using CVD graphene sheets and fabricated on SiO2 were highly p-doped, which was confirmed by the positive values of CNP. There are two main origins of pdoping: (i) PMMA residue and (ii) SiO2 substrates. The p-doping seemed to be gradually countered; that is, the CNP became close to zero during the electrical measurements over time. We proposed a possible mechanism for the drift, in which the two origins of p-doping were gradually countered by cations, such as the K + and Na + included in the D-PBS(-). This mechanism was supported by the experimental results: (i) when the GFETs were sufficiently countered with cations, which are known as n-dopants to graphene, the transfer curves were stable during long-term electrical measurements, and (ii) cations were detected in the GFETs after immersion in the electrolyte solution. Finally, by countering the GFETs with cations prior to evaluation, the CNP drift was suppressed by 96%. Our method should produce a stable GFET sensor platform.
Further experiments are needed to comprehensively understand the mechanism of cation accumulation in graphene. It might be possible to discover a more effective pretreatment method by studying the mechanism in more detail. Furthermore, the functionalization of graphene sensors is possible by controlling the amount of accumulated cations.    Figure 11B shows the peak of the C1s. The sp 2 C-C bonding in graphene is assigned at approximately 285 eV, and some other tails appearing on the high-energy side correspond to the binding energy of species in PMMA or functional groups on graphene [36]. In the case of the GFET without electrolyte immersion, the graphene-derived 285 eV peak was more prominent than the PMMA-derived 289 eV peak; thus, the surface of the GFET was less contaminated with PMMA. The GFET with electrolyte immersion has a wider C1s peak, especially on the high-energy side, compared to those without electrolyte immersion. This result implies that C-C bonds of graphene partly become C-O bonds during electrolyte immersion. In the GFETs, the graphene and gold electrodes were electrically connected with the electrolyte solution. Under such circumstances, a galvanic current may flow through the graphene, gold electrodes, and electrolytes, which occurs when two different metals are present in an electrolyte solution. The current possibly caused a redox reaction on the graphene surface [37]. Consequently, the graphene may have been partially oxidized. This oxidation of the graphene could also have contributed to the change in the electrical properties, although the transfer curves were not significantly changed by the pre-treatments, aside from the CNP shift.

Conclusions
We developed GFETs and evaluated the changes in their electrical characteristics. The GFETs using CVD graphene sheets and fabricated on SiO 2 were highly p-doped, which was confirmed by the positive values of CNP. There are two main origins of p-doping: (i) PMMA residue and (ii) SiO 2 substrates. The p-doping seemed to be gradually countered; that is, the CNP became close to zero during the electrical measurements over time. We proposed a possible mechanism for the drift, in which the two origins of p-doping were gradually countered by cations, such as the K + and Na + included in the D-PBS(-). This mechanism was supported by the experimental results: (i) when the GFETs were sufficiently countered with cations, which are known as n-dopants to graphene, the transfer curves were stable during long-term electrical measurements, and (ii) cations were detected in the GFETs after immersion in the electrolyte solution. Finally, by countering the GFETs with cations prior to evaluation, the CNP drift was suppressed by 96%. Our method should produce a stable GFET sensor platform.
Further experiments are needed to comprehensively understand the mechanism of cation accumulation in graphene. It might be possible to discover a more effective pretreatment method by studying the mechanism in more detail. Furthermore, the functionalization of graphene sensors is possible by controlling the amount of accumulated cations.