Next Article in Journal
Study on Machine Tool Positioning Uncertainty Due to Volumetric Verification
Previous Article in Journal
Learning the Orientation of a Loosely-Fixed Wearable IMU Relative to the Body Improves the Recognition Rate of Human Postures and Activities
Open AccessArticle

Monitoring of Heart Rate from Photoplethysmographic Signals Using a Samsung Galaxy Note8 in Underwater Environments

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
2
Educational Psychology and Leadership, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(13), 2846; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132846
Received: 27 March 2019 / Revised: 13 May 2019 / Accepted: 4 June 2019 / Published: 26 June 2019
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a commonly used in determining heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2). However, PPG measurements and its accuracy are heavily affected by the measurement procedure and environmental factors such as light, temperature, and medium. In this paper, we analyzed the effects of different mediums (water vs. air) and temperature on the PPG signal quality and heart rate estimation. To evaluate the accuracy, we compared our measurement output with a gold-standard PPG device (NeXus-10 MKII). The experimental results show that the average PPG signal amplitude values of the underwater environment decreased considerably (22% decrease) compared to PPG signals of dry environments, and the heart rate measurement deviated 7% (5 beats per minute on average. The experimental results also show that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and signal amplitude decrease as temperature decreases. Paired t-test which compares amplitude and heart rate values between the underwater and dry environments was performed and the test results show statistically significant differences for both amplitude and heart rate values (p < 0.05). Moreover, experimental results indicate that decreasing the temperature from 45 °C to 5 °C or changing the medium from air to water decreases PPG signal quality, (e.g., PPG signal amplitude decreases from 0.560 to 0.112). The heart rate is estimated within 5.06 bpm deviation at 18 °C in underwater environment, while estimation accuracy decreases as temperature goes down. View Full-Text
Keywords: photoplethysmography; PPG; heart rate variability; underwater; temperature photoplethysmography; PPG; heart rate variability; underwater; temperature
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Askarian, B.; Jung, K.; Chong, J.W. Monitoring of Heart Rate from Photoplethysmographic Signals Using a Samsung Galaxy Note8 in Underwater Environments. Sensors 2019, 19, 2846.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop